Animals And Animal Rights

Animals And Animal Rights
Introduction, animals that are being tested safety of their products that's been a subject of an intense debate for over 10 years. While, a lot of people
that alleged animals, the remained animals are being subjugated by the research cosmetics companies all over the country/all over the world. Even
though, the scientists frequently profit from animal research, I don't think all the suffering, the pain, and the animals dying are worth just trying find
out the human benefits from the products. Foremost, the animal's rights were dishonored when they are used in experiments. Humans and animals are
very similar in a lot of ways, such as both humans and animals think, they behave, experience pain and they have feelings too. Therefore, animals must
remain preserved with the same admiration as us humans. Even though, the animal's rights had been dishonored when they're being used in
examination because they can't say no. The Animals are endangered because of the tests, the tests often cause permanent damage or even death. The
animals never have the option if they want to do the experiment. Animals don't just freely give up themselves for the development for new technology.
The scientist makes the animals decision for them whether they like it or not. Their decisions are made for them because they cannot tell them what
they do or don't want to happen to them. When the scientist chooses the animals destiny in their experimental environments, the animal's rights are
taken away
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Bill Of Rights For Animal Rights
For centuries, animals have played a huge part in people's lives. Some people worship animals, and for other people animals may be nothing but a
source of food. The Animal Legal Defense Fund Organization has sponsored a petition that calls for increased protection for the rights of animals. The
petition calls for the right of all animals to be free of exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse, and enumerates further rights for laboratory animals, farm
animals, companion animals, and wildlife. Animals should have a bill of rights because animals are very like us, even though people don't notice it
and people should treat animals with respect. This is important because if we don't do something about it than animals are going to be treated badly...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Animals should have a right to live without being confined, exploited, tormented, or eaten. That means no animal experimentation, no fur or leather
clothing, and a vegan or vegetarian lifestyle (Frazier 2). For instance, the Great Ape Project demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for
chimpanzees, gorillas, bonobos, and orangutans" (Yong 2). This law would ban the uses of apes in experiments or entertainment or commercial
ventures, and they would set higher standards for their conditions in captivity. This means that animals are not property. Singer is the head of GAP
and says that they "should extend rights to a wide range of nonhuman animals" (Yong 5). This law should extend to more animals like dogs, pigs, rats,
guinea pigs, etc because lot's of animals get used to test out beauty products. Animals shouldn't be used as tests because it's cruel and inhumane.
According to Humane Society International, usually animals that are used for experimentation are forced to eat, are forced inhalation, water and food
deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint ("Animal Testing"). This needs to stop. On the other hand, people think that we need to test on
animals on some of the cosmetics and healthcare products to ensure the safety of the products. American women use an average of 12 personal care
products per day, so product safety is of great importance ("Animal Testing"). My

The Debate On Animal Rights
There are two major schools of thought on animal protection. First, is the tenet that animals should have rights and the second, more radical view, is
that animals should be liberated. Many of the rights that are promoted for animals are similar to the rights of human democratic societies. The basic
rights, which are recommended by a number of advocates, are that animals should be free from suffering, be in possession of their own life, and their
basic interests should be given the same consideration as humans (Taylor, 2009). The more extreme view, is that animals should be considered as
people and not property (Francione, 2008). There are a number of leading philosophers that have published opinions on the legitimacy of animal rights.
The debate on animal rights has been discussed since close to the beginning of historical time. The reference in the Bible of Adam having dominion
over the fish, birds, and animals that inhabit the earth implies ownership or some form of property rights to the animals (Francione, 1995). The
implication was that man was superior to animals because he was created in the image of God. The Greek philosopher Aristotle based his opinions on
the idea that animals did not have the ability to reason and so they were below humans (Taylor, 2009). Rene Descartes, a French philosopher who is
known as the father of modern philosophy, had a tremendous influence on the animal rights debate and his opinions are still being quoted today in
papers and

Animals Rights : Animal Rights
Harley Sargent
Ms. Clements
English 1301 12:00
9/20/17
Animal Rights Animal rights activists believe in giving the life of an animal the same importance as a human's life. Animal welfare accepts that
animals have interests but allow those interests to be traded away as long as the people benefit from the sacrifice. In contrast, animal rights theories say
that animals, like humans, cannot be sacrificed or traded away to benefit individuals and their needs. Animals should not have the same rights as
humans because they were not put on this earth to serve as equals they were put here for us to benefit from.
Animal activist want to state their opinion on how farm animals are mistreated but do not witness this abuse first hand, or they just hear it through the
grapevine and believe what they hear. Most of these people do not have pets unless they are house pets such as dogs, cats, and hamsters. I believe
these animal activist have no room to talk about our ranching or farming communities in a bad way because nine times out of ten, animals on a ranch
and farm get cared for better than most people expect.
The 4h program is a program for youth to get involved with a project such as a goat, sheep, cow or rabbit and learn how to properly care for it and
exhibit that animal to its fullest potential. For example, the livestock that is being prepared to show get a bath at least twice a day if not more, and
most are in a climate controlled area in the summer to stay cool and

Animal Rights Controversy
For the fifth time that day, Mrs. Jacobs walks past the Miller's window where she stares at their family pug. All of her effort to not open the door is
confined in hatred, this animal that doesn't deserve to be cooped up all day, being taken advantage of. All animals should be loved, animal critics argue,
but it is not necessary for animals to be given rights because of their lack of communication with humans. The argument of animal rights has exploded
in the last decade, creating organizations like P.E.T.A. (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and A.L.F. (Animal Liberation Front) both of
which are trying to enforce the government to create laws for animal rights. Animal rights have been a topic of discussion as early as Ancient Rome,...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What will happen to all the advancements in medical research, and will animals be put in prison or brought to jury? The American College of
Surgeons has announced that animal research for education and scientific studies will not be able to be replaced, because of the life changing medical
advances that animals have accomplished for humans. Cancer and HIV medications have depended on animals to test the effectiveness of the drug and
the safety. "In 2005, AIDS patient advocates campaigned against PETA, criticizing the group for standing in the way of research that requires the use of
animals for toxicity testing." (Lee and Cushman 4). Animal critics believe that animals should not have rights because of the huge improvement they
had made on medicines with animal testing. Animal testing is not supposed to harm animals its suppose to find ways to help fight diseases for humans
like: Insulin injections for diabetes patients, chemotherapy for cancer patients, stem cell transplants, vaccines for smallpox, polio, and yellow fever
(Rich). If animals were given rights, researches with animals would have to be discontinued because it would be against the law. Scientists say it would
be devastating and would be a hold to scientific advancement in the medical field (Rich). If animals were given rights, we can't understand them and
they can't comprehend morality. Animal rights supporters argue that everything in life should have the same equal value. Some with higher thinking,
such as forming beliefs about the world and to respond emotionally and animals that can do this can be granted natural human rights. This has raised a
question to the logical end, "Consider, for instance, the relative value of a highly functioning great ape, capable of complex communications and
sophisticated tool use, and that of a human child with severe cognitive disabilities, who will never learn language

Anthropocentrism And Animal Rights Essay
Outside of secular views about animal rights, two Christian–oriented views exist on the subject. The first is anthropocentrism. The simple definition of
the term is "man–centered" (Cairns 29). Adherents of this view see creation as valuable only if it serves a utilitarian purpose for humanity (Linzey
16). Humans are seen to be the only creatures who receive "direct divine and moral concern," thus making them superior to any animal (Green 69).
Furthermore, the view denies that animals have any rights at all (Geisler 356–57). Several arguments are made to support this point, such as the fact
that animals are not persons and that humanity is a steward of God's creation, though this does not mean animals have rights (Linzey 75–77; 86–89).
The second Christian–oriented view of animal rights is non–anthropocentrism. As the term suggests, the view is the complete opposite of
anthropocentrism. Rather than see humanity as the most significant creature in the universe, non–anthropocentrism sees it as a neighbor to animals
because "all who share with us the divine spark of conscious life, given by God at creation, are our neighbors" (Phelps 42). Many claims are made to
support this premise. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
No matter what is under consideration, "all creation has independent worth and irreducible value" (Geisler 345). Theologically, since God provides for
all creation, this means that it all possesses intrinsic value (Linzey 8–9). Second, the view asserts that animals have souls (Phelps 57). Allegedly,
Genesis chapters one and two indicate that humans and animals have the same "life force" and "divine breath" (58–61; Gen. 1:24; 2:7, 19).
Furthermore, it is suspected that Isaiah recorded the presence of animals in heaven (63; Is. 11:6–9). Therefore, non–anthropocentrism claims, animals
have souls and will be present in

Essay on Nonhuman Animal Rights
In regards to animals, the issue of rights and whether they exist becomes a touchy subject. In the essay, "Nonhuman Animal Rights: Sorely Neglected,"
author Tom Regan asserts that animals have rights based upon inherent value of experiencing subjects of a life. Regan's argument will first be
expressed, later explained, and evaluated in further detail. Lastly, that fact that Regan thinks rights are harbored under the circumstance of being an
experiencing subject of a life will also be discussed in terms of the incapacitated, etc. Regan positively argues that both human and nonhuman
individuals are experiencing subjects of a life. Experiencing subjects of a life have an inherent value, which is nevertheless, equal among the populace.
One's... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is as if one says a human who is an experiencing subject of a life must be able to understand and communicate its thoughts. Where do animals fit in?
Do we discount them because they do not speak our language and we cannot understand theirs? Experiencing subjects of a life, in the eyes of Regan,
are argued to have an inherent value, a basic right that is equal amongst individuals. Regan believes that because an individual is a subject experiencing
life, said subject has an inherent value. Regan notes that critics argue that only humans have inherent value, but if such delegation of species takes
place, speciesism, a form of discrimination, the fact of the matter becomes essentially immoral. The reduction of a subject's inherent value based on
grouping of species is indeed a form of inequality...of speciesism. He argues that in order for inherent value to be portrayed equally, discrimination of
the sort cannot be morally acceptable, nor tolerated. Regan accepts that simply saying that humans have more inherent value than animals is not a
rational justification. One can say that an individual's mother has more worth than a dog's mother; however, on what grounds does this argument lie?
This is merely an irrational and immoral statement that degrades an individual. In turn, the justification of which individual has more

Rights Of Animal Rights : Animal Bill Of Rights
Animal Bill of Rights Do you know 2 million animals are killed by wildlife services ? Animal rights have been a prevalent issue since 1970s. An
organization called Animal Legal Defense Fund has supported a petition that strengthens the protection of animal rights. The petition states that all
animals are to be free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse. TheAnimal Defense Fund is working on trying to show congress the importance of
the Animal Bill of Rights. Every day, animals are being manipulated by humans to do things that they don'twant to do, or that violate their rights as
living creatures on Earth. Animals and humans should have equal rights despite of their barriers . As an animal lover, I agree with the idea of creating
the Bill of Rights for animals. Furthermore, creating the Animal Bill of Rights not only protects the animals from being abused but, also makes them
seem as valuable as a human being. Animals are not valued enough. They are seen as less than humans just because they are animals. That's the reason
as to why there are millions of domestic animals being abused. Rifkin states " millions of domestic animals raised under the most inhumane
conditions"(60). Animals are just important as humans. The Bill of Rights for animals wants to ensure that these kinds of act doesn't happen. The Bill
of Rights for Animals does not only focus on domestic pets, but all species of animals. As

The Rights Of Animals : The Basic Tenets Of Animal Rights
Imagine being burned by a product without any expectation of the outcome being harmful. Reminisce on the time an abrupt injury occurred when it
was not deserved. Visualize a shorter life expectancy because being added to a risky experiment was more vital than living. With all being said, I
know I have made my point clear. What is in it for them? By "them," I mean the innocent animals of the world being harmed and killed because of
vivisection. "Animals have an intrinsic value separate from any value they have to humans and are worthy of moral consideration. They have a right to
be free from oppression, confinement, use and abuse by humans" ("Basic Tenets ofAnimal Rights" 1). Animals have a right to be free of pain;
therefore, changes need to be made to end undeserved suffering. What is vivisection? Vivisection is defined and known worldwide as "surgery being
conducted for experimental purposes on a living organism, typically animals with a central nervous system, to view living internal structure. The word
is, more broadly, used as a pejorative catch–all term for experimentation on live animals" (Neavs 1). Many different species are being used around the
world, but the most common include mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, farm animals, birds, cats, dogs, mini–pigs, monkeys, and in some
countries, chimpanzees. It is baffling that Humans are destroying these intellectual animals for the sake of something as small and simple as a lipstick.
Visualize an innocent monkey being burned by multiple chemicals all because of a failed lipstick experiment. It is mind boggling that scientists do as
they please and do not consider the harm being done to these animals. As these animals are locked, cramped, and worrisome in a lab, they begin to
wonder what they have done wrong to deserve so much suffering. Humans are not the only living organisms who carry emotions. Imagine what these
poor animals go through, what they are thinking, and how much they wish they were not in a laboratory position. Think about lying in a cold, cramped
cage with cuts throughout the skin, broken bones, no medication for pain, bleeding, trauma, etc. The list goes on for these animals. In research and
testing, animals are subjected

Animal Rights In Animal Testing
Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F. Barbara
Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in
biomedical research and product–safety testing (62). People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others
view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research. However individuals perceive animals, the fact remains
that animals are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics companies all across the country and all around the world. Although humans often
benefit from successful animal research, the pain, the suffering, and the deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits. Therefore,
animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of products. First, animals' rights are violated when they are used in research. Tom Regan, a
philosophy professor at North Carolina State University, states: "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. . . .This inherent value is
not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment" (qtd. in Orlans 26). Animals and people are alike in many ways;
they both feel, think, behave, and experience pain. Thus, animals should be treated with the same respect as humans. Yet animals' rights are violated

Persuasive Essay On Animal Rights
"Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way." 36 years ago, PETA started the animal rights
movement. During the Silver Spring monkeys case, a member of PETA began working in the lab. This is when the mistreatment of the monkeys was
brought to the public, and PETA achieved the first U.S supreme court victory for animals used in experiments. Since then, theanimal rights movement
has been growing. Animals rights have become such a controversial issue since this movement began, mainly because animal abuse is such a prevalent
issue throughout the world that needs to come closer to being resolved.
Animal abuse is a very well–known issue that occurs today. Animal rights has turned into something millions of people are an advocate for and is even
a common topic. This is because so many conflicts exist that promote the mistreatment of animals. Things such as using animal fur, eating meat,
hunting for sport, animal experimentation, and many more. Many believe that animals do not deserve this treatment, because they are living creatures
just like humans. many others will have opposing opinions, such as animals were put on this earth for us to able to use however we want. Everyone's
different opinion forms the core of animal rights issues, but agencies such as PETA continue to fight for the rights of animals to be treated more
humanely. In their eyes, animals should have basic morals and legal rights, especially those. these

Immanuel Kant On Animal Rights
Immanuel Kant believed that only humans are to be treated as end and that animals do not have moral value they are only a " means to our ends."
Kant did not consider animals to be moral agents and since animals are not moral agents then they are not ends in themselves therefore they do not
deserve rights. As a student of philosophy I found myself disagreeing completely with Kant's view on animal rights. I recognize the differences between
humans and animals, yet I believe that the differences do not separate animals from deserving rights. Research has proven that many non–humans share
capacities that are viewed as unique to humans. Also if Kant's consideration for rights is based on being a rational being or a moral agent then many
being in society who are held with moral values would not be deserving ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Kant agreed that animals should not just be killed for the pleasure or beat for no good sake. Kant believed this because if a person decides to treat
animals abusively or wrongly then that person may encounter problems with other people. Acting inhumanely toward any other person or non–human
animal is not morally right in any situation as it will not only affect the subject being treated wrongly but it will affect the person doing the actions
character. Kant also believed that it is only morally right for a person to act from duty only and for no other reason. An example would be if an
animal was hit by a car and a person stopped to observe the scene. The person examines the animal's injuries and sees that the animal just needs
medical attention. Kant would say that the person should take the animal to receive medical attention. Not because the person may feel bad for the
animal and not because the person wants to be seen as a caring person, but because it is the right thing to

Animal Rights And Human Rights
Animal rights is a very controversial topic in today's world. This controversy began back in 1975 when Peter Singer's novel Animal Liberation was
published. In the book, Singer explains the issues we still face at the top of animal protectionism today. Although Singer and his theories enlightened a
lot of people of animal protectionism, he actually did not start the animal rights debate. People started questioning the status of animals all the way back
to ancient Greece. Some people in these times such as Pythagoras, the great mathematician, chose to live as a vegetarian because he believed animals
deserved different protections. We now know humans have been fighting for animalrights for longer than expected. Although many people believe that
the legislation of animal rights is more than necessary, others can argue thathuman rights come before animal rights. We will start our debate with the
views of those who favor animals rights. The whole idea is founded on the belief that non–human animals have the same interests and rights as human
beings. Animal rights activists seek to include non–human animals in the same moral community that humans belong. The movement is trying to
encourage others to respect and consider the interests of a non–human animal in the same way they would a human's interests. In reality, adopting
animal rights would mean non–human animals would not be used in the process of making food, clothing, entertainment, or for experimentation.
People who

Peta Animal Rights
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is an animal rights organization that was founded in March 1980. This organization mainly focuses
their efforts on the humane treatment of animals and operates as a driving force behind the animal rights movement. Their slogan "animals are not ours
to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way" is a testament to their main focus of rescuing and protecting animals
from harmful environments.
This organization is often at the forefront of making often little known topics "mainstream" to its supporters. For instance, with recent news of issues
such as melting ice caps, record high temperatures, and increasing air pollution, PETA decided to take initiative and educate... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This image relies on and utilizes the audiences' emotions. Most people care about the environment and the Earth, therefore more people will be willing
to switch to a vegan lifestyle. This image represents another one of PETA's points on the benefits of becoming a vegetarian. According to PETA,
becoming a vegetarian can help save the environment and even affect climate change because the creation of meat factories causes environmental
destruction Although PETA's simple solution to our complex predicament seems to be an easy fix, requiring a society that is rooted on the foundation
of meat such as beef burgers, hot dogs, and chicken nuggets can be quite a challenge. PETA states that "typical meat–eaters who switched to a vegan
diet reduced their food–related carbon footprint by 60 percent, saving 1.5 tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere each year". According to
their independent researcher, the study states that "vegans' carbon footprint is 25 percent smaller than that of vegetarians, who still eat dairy products
and eggs." Also, PETA states that the amount of methane produced by the billions of animals "produce enormous amounts of methane, through the
acres of waste "lagoons" that store their feces". According to the Environmental Protection Agency, "the impact of methane on climate change is 25
times greater than carbon dioxide over a 100–year period... the digestive processes of animals used for food and the management of manure together
account for more than a third of total methane emissions in the

Animal Rights Argumentative Analysis
What makes hunting and trapping for sport is that people that do hunt or trap are seeing these animals as renewable resources. They can reproduce
without the help of humans; however, that does not give humans the right to use them as a natural resource. It is a failure to not treat them with
respect. One of the main concerns for defending hunting is that it is not different than what wildlife does to each other. The rights view sees that
animals not moral agents, and have different morals than what humans have. Then only have to kill what they need to. The still cause harm, but do no
moral harm in the logic of the rights view.
Regan does take into account how humans treat endangered species. The rights view is not contrasting to the efforts ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Leaver culture considers nature in how it improves with the world around it. Ismael uses the story of Cain and Able to explain the difference. For
anyone that has grown up learning about Christian beliefs, the story of Cain and Able is taught as a way that if you go against God then you get
punished. The way Ishmael explains it, is more about a difference of cultures. Able represents the Leaver culture, while Cain is a part of the Taker
culture. If humans look at the story from the Taker perspective, they see how it is a perspective in the bible. The story makes more sense if it looked
from a Leavers perspective. However, Leaver culture is not fully gone; but Taker culture has taken a majority of control.
Regan main claim is that humans are no capably of fully knowing when the animals suffer, but that does not deny them the rights they need. Regan is
searching for the answer in how to communicate with animals. Ishmael knows that our lost connection with nature is due to human's own fault.
Humans separated ourselves so far that humans cannot reach that communication point with nature. However, if humans were to be like Leaver
culture, then humans would be able to work with nature. At that point humans could gain the communication back to

animal rights Essay
Humans have rights that are either natural rights or earned rights. Natural rights are rights that every person is born with and keeps throughout his life.
Some of these rights include freedom of speech, the right to an attorney, and other common sense rights. Some people believe that animals do not have
souls; therefore, they do not have any rights (Regan 104). On the other hand, there are earned rights like the rights given to hunters. Hunters have the
right to hunt as long as they do not break any laws while doing so. For instance, they should not hunt out of season or hunt extinct animals. Also,
hunters are always trying to find a new hunting buddy, so they are trying to convert a non–hunter into a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"If the inherent value of humans means that they have the right to be treated with respect, then the same applies to animals" ("Animals are Equal to
Humans").
Also, they do not like the idea of animals being hurt in any way. "Because animals do not have a life after they die, we should do everything in our
power to ensure that this, their only life, is as long and good as possible" (Regan
104). So regardless, animals have rights, but exactly how many rights do they have? Animals' rights are different from human rights. Although animals
can not talk, some humans speak up for the rights of animals. These humans are sometimes known as animal rights activists. Some of these people
hold protests to make their points. People may think that protests never happen, especially the ones that end up in a brawl. "According to a list
compiled by the
Foundation for Biomedical Research, at least 37 demonstrations were planned by groups in 15 states for World Laboratory Animal Liberation Week"
(Holden). "A new law could send animal rights activists in Britain to jail for up to five years if they cross the line between peaceful protest and
harassment" (Vogel).
Also, according to a statement by the government, illegal protests include those that are outside of people's homes the cause alarm, harassment, or
distress to the residents (Vogel). They believe that humans

Animal Rights Essay
Animals and man have shared this planet since humans first appeared on earth. Animals have provided transportation, food, clothing, shelter,
companionship and entertainment throughout the ages. Therefore, it is our duty to treat animals with respect, care and kindness and not cause them
undue suffering, because they have, in many ways, made it possible for man to survive on earth. However, because normal adult humans have superior
mental abilities in the hierarchical scale in nature, animals have fewer rights than humans. Consequently, it is our responsibility to support and maintain
the animal kingdom (to the best of our ability); therefore helping to preserve them as fellow members or our community of life on earth.
There are many ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Animals should be viewed as experiencing subjects of life with inherent value of their own. We are guilty of speciesism and have been inhumane and
evil to creatures that are powerless. He contends that any change requires a change in our heads and hearts.
It would seem that Regan wrote this essay because he feels there has been a blatant cruelty and disregard for animals. He does not mention however,
that all species use each other as resources–that is the way of nature. He seems to be denying or ignoring that natural phenomenon. Everything and
everyone is a resource in one way or another. Humans and animals are hosts for many insects, parasites and microscopic organisms, which are part of
nature's food chain.
As founder of the Animal Rights Liberation, utilitarian Peter Singer agrees with Regan's opinion that we are guilty of speciesism. He defines
"speciesism" as "a prejudice or attitude of bias toward the interests of members of one's own species." He informs the reader that he owes this term to
Richard Ryder.
In his essay "All Animals are Equal", Singer laments the fact that the majority of humans take an active part in, or allow their taxes to pay for the
sacrificing species in order to promote their self–interests. To believe that only human life is sacrosanct is wrong, in his view, and another example of
speciesism. He believes we must allow beings, human or animal, which are similar in all relevant aspects, to

The Rights Of Human Rights And Animal Rights
Animals are not suppose to be used as food, clothing, entertainment, experimentation or any other purpose and that animals deserve consideration and
what is in their best interests. Animal right is a movement that tends to protect animals from being used and abuse by humans. This includes the use of
animals for anything that causes them pain and suffering, such as medical experiments, imprisonment in circuses and zoos, and fur production. Animal
rights support the idea that all animals are to be treated humanely and away from pain, suffering or murder. They shouldn't be used as food, fur or
entertainment. Animal rights seek to promote treatment of living beings through legislation, protest campaigns, research public events and other
techniques such as celebrity spokesman ship. Animals are also the creatures living on earth with us. If people say animals should be killed and served
us as food, then why don't we eat human? Human have the same nutrition that could be served, there's no point to say that killing human is criminal
but killing animal is legal. Animals have the right to live in condition that in benefit and satisfy their nature needs, which include freedom, enough
space and environment. But people draw negative attention to animal related issue; they give out the wholly false information. For example on one
website there was a picture of some sheep gathered into a holding yard and the caption said that, "this is now sheep live all the time." They totally
fail to mention the green field in the picture, with no doubt, it is where the sheep will not be returned once they have been sheared, or even killed. In
today's society, people create some organization for fighting their government toward freedom and rights. They are fortunate because they have
ability to speak for themselves. How about animals? People are always taking advantages from animals by killing and entertaining, and sadly they
don't have a voice to fight against it. Some of you might say, if animals cannot be killed for food, everyone will need to become vegetarian, and
getting the right amount of protein per day will be more difficult. And from the traditional Christian view, they also think that god has created animals
for the use of

Animal Rights And Human Cruelty
(iii) Animal Rights Once rights are granted to certain groups of people, more and different types of group also starts asking for rights. This is an
example of a "slippery slope" argument. Similarly, there are groups of people who advocates for the rights of animals. They are speaking out against
cruelty that animals have to go through like slaughtering them for food, conducting different kinds of experiments on them, etc. While pro–animal rights
people argue about those types of "cruelty," another group of people believe that animals are needed for those kinds of purposes. Animal rights activists
have said that the cruel activities that humans conduct on animals is discrimination is a result of "speciesism." While racism means discriminating
people based on race, speciesism means discriminating and treating other species unfairly. Many animal rights activists take the stand of the unequal
value theory. They say that they oppose to animal cruelty as much as they opposehuman cruelty but that does not mean that they value the life of
animal equal to the life of a human being. The lives of the animals have some value and killing it would be wrong. With regard to the exploitation of
animals, people believe it is acceptable for several reasons. Firstly, they think that humans are the most important beings on the planet, and everything
must be done to ensure human survival. If this means experimenting on animals so that we can fight and find cures for diseases or using them as

Animal Rights
Is it cruel to slaughter animals for eating? If you're an animal lover or vegetarian, you may think it's unethical to slaughter animals for consuming.
There are many different views on animal rights, according to Philosopher Tom Regan who is a strong believer on animal rights and why they deserve
not to be harmed. He wrote that the fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, that they are here for us–to be
eaten, surgically manipulated or exploited for sports or money. Once we accept this view of animals– as our resources– the rest is as predictable as it is
regrettable. If we are taught that animals have no moral status it can affect our understanding on their reasoning of life. Regan Kantians belief was
animals have the same rights as humans, they too feel pain and suffering. Singer who is a Utilitarian believes human beings are of value so therefore
animal rights have no importance. There are positive and negative arguments on both ends. I see why Regan's views are important and how animals
can be looked at as useless creatures. I never once thought eating meat was unethical. I feel every individual is raised differently from culture to
religious differences. I was brought up eating meat but never thought of it being inhumane to kill cows, pigs, chickens and fish for food. Now
animals like dogs and cats I do believe have emotions. We also consider them companions so I feel they have a moral status and rights to be taken care
of.

Persuasive Essay On Animal Rights
Have you ever seen a tiger jump through hoops in the wild, or do hard tricks because they want to? I didn't think so that's because they don't want
to. Animals are forced to learn these tricks by using a shock collar, whips, electric prods, etc. Puppy's are being kept in a puppy mill, animals are
being neglected and abused. I have basically had a zoo at my house, I have 3 birds, 1 chicken, 2 fish, 1 puppy and I don't want them to feel like they
are neglected and it hurts me when I see that Animals are being neglected.
While all of my research that I did on animal rights I wanted to find helpful information and guess what I found... Helpful information. So I asked
myself some questions. Is there anything that can help animals? Can I do anything about? So I made a driving question and it was What can society
do to solve this problem about Animal rights? I was looking up things about this topic and I found a lot of things that can help to prevent or at least
help animal rights.
The problem is that people are neglecting, abusing, and even get up to the point of killing the animals. The reasons why people started to protest is
because other people started to use animal fur, killed animals for food, killed cows for leather, and animal habitats were being destroyed. According to
Britannica school people started to protest about animal right in the 1970.
The animals that are being most abused are pets and zoo animals. A lot of people are concerned about these animals

Animal Rights And The Rights Of Animals
For many years now the world has seen controversy over the rights of animals and if they think and feel like humans do. Many people see animals as
mindless creatures or as food, while others think they have emotions and can feel pain. In other countries animal protection laws are in place that are
strictly enforced and seem to work well with the system. In the United States however; some of the animal rights laws are considered to be useless and
under–enforced (Animal Legal & Historical Center). More people today are beginning to see that animals should have rights and should be protected
by laws and regulations (Animal Legal & Historical Center). Sadly there are many people residing in the United States who don't take animal rights or
protection laws seriously. These people abuse animals in many ways, including food industries that disobey the regulations set in place for the slaughter
of animals used for consumption. Luckily for the animals there are people who fight for their rights and the enforcement of laws called animal rights
activists.
The controversy over the rights of animals continues today within the United States. There has always been a question about the emotions of animals.
Can animals feel and exhibit emotions in the same way that humans do? Some people agree that animals do show signs of intelligence and emotions
like love and pain. After–all there are bird breeds who mate with only one partner during their lifespan giving us the impression

Animal Rights For Animals
George Bernard Shaw once said, " the worst sin towards our fellow creatures is not to hate them, but to be indifferent to them: that's the essence of
inhumanity." The issue of giving animals rights has dated back to the ancient Greek in Romans. They believed that people who died who be reborn
in a new life as an animal. This issue has date since sixth century B.C.E until now. As of now the biggest controversy was the seaworld case involving
their interaction with the orcas that had been the stars of their park. There were many other cases and the issue soon began to escalate as the number
of injuries and occasional deaths increased. Once the problems go to court a decision of removing the exhibit was the best way to decrease injury by
no longer creating contact with the animals. The United States should create a set of rights for animals in the entertainment industry in order to give
those animals proper treatment. The film documentary Blackfish discusses the issues with Seaworld's orca exhibit and they expose all the problems
and issues that orca's experience after the show. During the documentary multiple trainers and seaworld employees who captured the orcas for the
shows came to a realization."This is a multi–billion dollar corporation that makes its money through the exploitation of Orcas." The cruelty in their
methods of capturing showed in the whales and how they were separated from their real families and would release the anger on trainers. All the orcas
had to

Animal Rights : The Animal Bill Of Rights For Animals
Animals are found throughout lives of humans. As companions, entertainment, test subjects and food, animals serve vital roles throughout our
lives.The Animal Bill of Rights, through the Animal Legal Defense Fund, attempts to defend the basic legal rights of all animals. However, to weigh
the need for such an act, one must compare the suffering of animals to the benefits such suffering gives to humankind. It's much more important to
highlight the crucial medical advances that lab animals have provided over the injustices they may suffer, but this suffering can not and should not be
ignored. It is with measure that we do not enact a bill of rights for animals, however we bring new awareness of animal research and the ethical
treatment of all ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Farmed animals, such as pigs and cattle, should be kept in clean and relaxed conditions. The acceptance of a culture that allows for the suffering of
animals from birth to death is not a culture of ethical morals. Certain accommodations must be made to the livestock trade in order to prevent physical
pain and negative mental situations.
As explained by the Jeremy Rifkin opinion piece, animals are capable of emotions in relation to time spent with others of their kind. A pig kept in
isolations' health deteriorates much faster than that of a pig kept in communal spaces with other pigs. Animals crave the same joys that we as human
beings crave, such as community and playtime. By removing these stimuli, animal health, physically and mentally is hindered.
If the only justification for these animal tests is if the only animal use in experimentation provides greater benefit to the health of humankind than the
cost to the animals. Clinical trials, especially for drugs for alzheimers, asthma, polio, antibiotics, meningitis, and other critical diseases go through
animal testing phases before reaching human test groups. Some of these drugs have been trialled successfully in humans, but their safety and efficacy
was first established in small and observable animal populations. It begs the question that– if animals are hurt by testing, but in the long run, human
lives are saved, what is morally correct?
In my experience, genetic diseases

Kantian Animal Rights
Mohandas Gandhi once expressed, "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated". Gandhi touches
upon the subject of animal rights and how humans must be judged by the way animals are treated. This brings up many questions about animal rights
such as what are the moral obligations humans have, if we have them, towards animals. And if we have these moral obligations towards animals, what
are the implications of these obligations for humans? Observing animals rights from the viewpoints of a utilitarian such as Peter Singer, an Animal
Rights Philosophy Specialist Tom Regan, and English Philosopher Roger Scruton, allows us to be able to fully develop and discuss the complexities of
animal rights. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He argues that marginal humans such as human vegetables deserve greater moral consideration than animals. He says that abnormality does not cancel
membership. we have duties to animals but only because they are dependent and affected by us. Animals are not persons and neither deserve rights nor
duties. Persons can engage in practical reasoning, in moral discussion and in respect for duties. Animals cannot and therefore do not get the rights nor
duties. Moreover, attempting to extend rights to animals is actually harmful for them because then they would be obligated and duty bound to
responsibilities they cannot be upheld to. Although animals do not have rights, we humans do have obligations to them. Suffering is a necessary part
of life justifying animals' suffering being essential for human needs to be met. We have stronger "duties" to animals who are dependent on us like our
pets. Also, once we somehow interfere with or alter an animal's life, we owe more duties to these animals out of mere charity showing an inequality of
treatment to animals. Scruton classes marginal cases that was briefly mentioned in Regan's argument as pre–moral, post–moral, and nonmoral.
Pre–moral are infants that have the potential to be moral beings. Post–moral are people who are considered senile or brain damaged meaning they no
longer have the capacity to be moral. And non–moral are congenital idiots who can never be moral. However, even though

Animal Rights Essay : Animal Abuse And Their Rights
Imagine being locked in a cage, having thousands of people each day watching, taunting, and provoking you. That image of what just came into your
mind is exactly what captive animals feel like all the time, every day. People believe animals should have rights. They need the same type of attention
and protection as we humans. "Two–thirds of Americans polled by the press agree with animal rights to live freely." (Tripp, P, 2003, pg 18) For
example, the original idea of a zoo was to inform people, common citizens with knowledge of the rare creatures that we would not normally see every
day. Somewhere along the way, that was changed. Animals are the same as humans, they have rights, there are multiple signs of neglect, and there are
ways you can report animal abuse. Many people think animal abuse is not common, but it's actually more common than you think someone could walk
past a house and hear an animal whining and that's one of signs for animal neglect. Animal neglect is caused by humans, not paying attention, feeding,
keeping their animals outside or torturing the animal. Animal abuse and neglect can be reduced by the people knowing the causes and reasons of
abusing animals.
Animals are the same as humans
"Over time, humans have realized they could feed, house and care for animals contently close to where they live and kill them when they are ready to
other than when they could be caught" (Tripp, P, 2003, pg. 10 ). Humans now days are not thinking animals could feel pain or

Animal Rights And Utilitarianism
Animal Rights and Utilitarianism
Peter Singer argues, in regard to animal rights, that equal beings with equal interests should be considered equally. Singer makes three claims about
equality to support his position; equality is based on equal consideration, speciesism is unjustified, and the ability to feel pain makes one worthy of
moral consideration. He believes equal interests deserve equal treatment, and guidelines for having interests concern sentience; the ability to experience
suffering. Comparing to the ideas of Mill, both are utilitarians and have a similar ideology around interests and moral consideration around the
treatment of animals. Singer's position on not eating meat is based on the utilitarian principle that ethical ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There will always be some humans who don't have the usual characteristics we find in an average human, therefore it is unfair to hold non–humans to
the same expectations. Singer explains that our consumption, killing, and bringing of suffering to animals, as a means to our end, is a clear example of
speciesism. This treatment is unjustified. Basing moral importance on species membership is also arbitrary, Singer argues. He believes it is not rational
to think members of your species deserve greater consideration than those in another group.
Singer's third argument for animal rights regards sentience. Sentience is considered to Singer as, "a pre–requisite for having interests at all". In order to
have interests, you must first have sentience. Sentience is the ability to experience pain or suffering. Singer believes that any being should be treated
equal regarding their interests if they are able to feel suffering. For example, popcorn can be eaten because it has no interests because it cannot suffer.
Therefore, popcorn does not need equal consideration of its interests, for it has no interests at all. If the suffering of a being is equal to another, then it
deserves equal concern. Beings that have the ability to suffer are united in their interest to not want to feel suffering. Animals and humans both suffer
and feel pain. So if they both can suffer, then

Animal Rights And Animal Abuse
Animal rights and animal abused
William Dudley stated "Humans feel pain and have rights; Animals feel pain; Therefore, animals have rights." Animals are unique creatures that have a
right to live, especially animals are part of nature. Although some animals are nearly extinct due to habitat destruction, for example, humans eliminate
forests to have more land or to desperately have cities. Animal rights are increasing the support not only to help animals, to surely help the earth.
Studies have developed many ways to support animal rights; For example, many organizations such as The American Society For The Prevention Of
Cruelty To Animals, The American Humane Association, and American Anti
–Vivisection Society has given protection for animals. These
organizations believe animals have emotions and are to be treated correctly. Animals are meant to have rights and should have support. If animals are
being used as medical research, livestock, and entertainment, it will lack the number of animals.
Scientists use mice and rats for medical research, since mice and rats are not protected under the Animal Welfare Act regulation and the United States
Department of Agriculture does not require rodents to be registered. Also animals are used in livestock to help humans to have beneficial products.
Lastly animals are used as entertainment for example, zoos, aquarium, and horse racing. The top arguments about animal abuse are how animals are
used in medical research, livestock, and

The Issue Of Animal Rights Essay
Animals have the right to equal consideration in regards to their being used for human needs as most people use animals for their own needs on a
daily basis even if only indirectly whether to entertain us, or to attain the product we are using, or on our dinner plate. The controversy of the
treatment of animals range from some activists and philosophers that are outspoken against animals being used by humans in any way for our own
personal needs, while others are candid in their belief that animals are here solely for meeting our needs and have no rights at all. Although everyone
is able to tailor their actions to fit their moral, ethical and individual beliefs, and many different categories of unique diets have come about from the
freedom of defining personal standards it is a controversial topic. With vegetarian and vegan diets', becoming more and more common deciding what
is morally justifiable in respects to the treatment of animals is an essential issue for everyone. The dispute of animal rights is essentially focused on what
rights animals deserve to have and how they should be treated in regards to being experimented on, for humans' entertainment, and their being used as
livestock. A controversial issue in the debate of animal rights is the health of the people that do not consume animals or animal products and those that
do. A large area of the debate is centered around the fact that is widely believed thatmeat from animals is necessary for a healthy and

A Philosophical View Of Animal Rights
A Philosophical View of Animal Rights
Should animals be harmed to benefit mankind? This pressing question has been around for at least the past two centuries. During the early nineteenth
century, animal experiments emerged as an important method of science and, in fact, marked the birth of experimental physiology and neuroscience as
we currently know it. There were, however, guidelines that existed even back then which restricted the conditions of experimentation. These early rules
protected the animals, in the sense that all procedures performed were done so with as little pain as possible and solely to investigate new truths.
Adopting the animals? perspectives, they would probably not agree that these types of regulations were much ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
(Rodd 4). So, it is easily seen how many views have accumulated over time. The task of determining animal rights has also come into the context of
examining these inherent differences on qualitative and quantitative levels. We can say, for instance, that on a qualitative level, a cow is less intelligent
than a human. But, we must then determine, on a quantitative level, how much more unintelligent that cow really is when compared to humans. And,
once we decide that, we must then decide if that margin of intelligence is enough for us humans to slaughter that cow in order to benefit human kind
from its products.
Questions like this and others, which are very similar, have become the snowballing debate over the question of animal rights. Where do we draw
the line? How do we determine the value of another being?s life? Well, up to this point, we as a society have been pretty confident in judging the
lives of millions of animals worldwide (or so we can conclude by looking at the number of animals sacrificed each year for the purpose of experiment,
education, goods, etc.). We must first step back and analyze the ethical dilemma at hand and then proceed to carefully weigh its consequences.
If we examine the question of animal rights cautiously, it is most often viewed as an ethical dilemma as opposed to an economic or

The Rights Of Animal Rights
Animal Rights
Animals Rights is a big discussion that has been around for while. Many argue since animals aren't human, it doesn't matter how they are treated or
taken care of. There are others that do care how our animals are treated and taken care of. Animal rights are rights believed to belong to animals to live
free from use in medical research, hunting, and other services to humans. This topic has been around for a while but has become more absolute
(Environmental Encyclopedia, Opposing Viewpoint). Animal rights involves personal, social, legal, religious, cultural values, belief, and decisions.
This alone causes the viewpoint to vary based on many factors. Add in the many benefits animals have for humans and the lines are blurred further.
Animals should be treated humanely as they are living breathing beings and are aware of their lives. Animals have similar levels of biological
complexity, they make conscious choices, and they are conscious and aware they exist.
Animals should have rights because many of them provide companionship for humans. Therapy dogs are canines that might be trained to provide
affection and comfort to people in hospitals,nursing homes, schools, disaster areas, and people with autism (General SHCS Info). Farm animals
provide services for humans such as producing milk, eggs, and wool. Animals like horses can be used to pull a plow, wagon, carriage, and can be
ridden to go to places. 62% of all U.S. households– more than 72.9 million

Animal Rights Philosophy
On the issue of animal rights, Carl Cohen takes on the perspective of a reformist. This means that he accepts animal experimentation and meat eating,
but believes that these institutions need to be improved upon. Cohen approaches the issue of animal rights using the ideas of obligations and rights,
with not only the reformist perspective, but with the speciesist perspective. The conclusion he draws is that animals do not necessarily have rights just
because humans have moral obligations to animals. Cohen comes to this conclusion through an analytical series of rights and obligations. His main
argument is the following: (1) Humans do have obligations to animals, (this sets him apart from abolitionists) (2) not every obligation arises... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I don not agree with Cohen's argument simply because it arises from a bias speciesist standpoint. Cohen states that humans are autonomous, when at
the same time some humans are not autonomous, and are as independent as pets. So do these humans not have rights? Cohen would once again
respond by using the far–fetched theory that "animals can not be bearers of rights because rights is essentially human; it s rooted in, and has a force
within, a human moral world." (Cohen 351) This relates back to Cohen looking at Regan's idea of animals not being moral because they cannot do
right or wrong. Well ifmorality is based on the ability to do wrong, then that doesn't sound like morality at all. We are not granted rights just for being
human, and we certainly are not granted rights for being capable of doing

Argumentary On Animals And Animal Rights
Devon: Hey Sasha!
Sasha: Hey Devon!
Devon: That class was crazy! There was so much information regarding animal rights...
Sasha: I know. But I don't know if any of that changed my views. I still think becoming a vegetarian is the way to go.
Devon: You think? I still think that it is okay to eat meat.The animals just need to be raised in a humane manner.
Sasha: Eh...I don't know. Animals should just be left alone and be free to roam around in the wild. They should not be tortured like those animals that I
saw while visiting that "kill floor".
Devon: But Sasha, it is not like that everywhere. I agree that they should not be tortured like the ones you saw on your field trip, but they still can live
a good life on a farm and be treated with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Devon: I can agree with that too! So, when animals are on the farm, they really don't know what's going to come in the future. Also, if they do get hurt,
they are able to get over it quickly and not sit there and think about the pain.
Sasha: But it still bothers me that they are not getting treated the same way as humans. I remember in Peter Singers article when he talked about the
idea of speciesism. He said that it was an attitude of bias that favored the interest of members of their own species (4). The one species is against the
other species.
Devon: Well, I can see how that is a good argument.
Sasha: And the fact that we treat these animals based on intelligence is also ridiculous. Just because a dog does not understand what it means to vote,
society should not consider it less intelligent than us. It is a living thing that deserves the best life.
Devon: Okay, but Sasha, you have to also remember that these animals do depend on us to continue to live a good life. Without us, they would be
put in the wild and be put at risk of dying fast. In Pollan's article, he discussed how animals live longer in captivity and how domesticated animals
can't live on their own in the wild (6). Yeah, they will not be living the absolute free life, but they will be protected and nourished if needed.
Sasha: Hmmm I never really noticed that. But, do you see how these animals are being treated like a tool? In Regan's article, he said that animals
should not be treated as a means

Animal Rights : The Animal Bill Of Rights
The Animal Bill of Rights is meant to protect animals that don't have legal protection. There are laws that protect some of the animals, but are often
insufficient and full of loopholes. In this society we have many people who think the total opposite of defending the animals. It may be because of
selfish thinking. Sometimes one might think, it is needed for them to survive or because they want to be able to show their children the animals in
person at zoos. Now, the question is, if animals need a Bill of Rights? I strongly believe that they do need a Bill of Rights because there are animals on
the day–to–day basis that are being mistreated and abused by humans that don't care for them. We need the Bill of Rights because it will give a
better voice to the animals being treated as if they were nothing in this world. I agree with what the source indicated " Animals in the U.S. are
considered just "property" by law, even though they are living, feeling beings". If they were not considered "property" humans wouldn't be harming
these animals and would rather be caring or not giving them much attention if they aren't an animal enthusiast. Many animals are being used for
experiments in laboratories. For example, birds, rats, and mice. These animals are being treated as like " oh, they don't really matter". But, not all of
the animals in the laboratories are being harmed. In Rifkin's article " A Change of Heart about Animals" he mentions two birds named Betty and Abel
whom are

Animal Rights Amendment
There should not be an amendment to the constitution granting animals rights. The reason I feel there should not be any amendment is because they
provide us with food, give us resources that we use daily and we also get long lasting clothes from using their fur or flesh. But I do believe there should
be laws on how to properly kill animals we consume or use for their fur, flesh or meat.
According to the article A Change of Heart about Animals says "What these researchers are finding is that many of our fellow creatures are more
like us then what we had ever imagined. They feel pain, suffer and experience stress,affection, excitement and even love..." But if the amendment
were to be passed how would we be allowed to hunt and kill to get meat. Animals such as pigs, cows, deer, and chickens provide us with meat to
feed our families and consume. We would not be able to continue doing this because in a lot of places they believe and feel this is cruel. How would
we be able to survive without being able to consume meat? Not everyone in the world is a fan of having to becoming vegetarians and have to cut meat
out ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They should not be abused or treated in a cruel way before being killed. Being killed in cruel ways now that I am against. They should have laws and
procedures on how to do it right and not put the animals through so much pain and suffering. It should be as fast as possible so the animal being
sacrificed for us does not feel as much pain. Animals feel everything we do!! Animals feel love, happiness, sadness and everything we do for example
in the article A Change of Heart about Animals explains about Koko "Equally impressive is Koko, the 300–pound Gorilla Foundation in Northern
California, who was taught sign language and has mastered more than 1,000 signs and understand several thousands English words.On a human IQ
tests,she scores between 70 and

Mike Rocheleau Animal Rights
Daniel Julius
Mr. Nordlund
Honors English I
May 21, 2015
Animal Rights: The Perpetual Disputes Over Animal Sterilization Human jurisdiction over animals has been a controversial idea since the most ancient
times (Clemmitt). Both species have an interdependent relationship with each other, and in more recent years, tensions have grown about how to foster
the relationship. In the twenty–first century, animal overpopulation – an excess of cats and dogs (Frank 114) – has risen to a global issue, and areas of
the world such as Shanghai, China are especially affected (Shanghai). Humans exercise their authority over animals by sterilizing them, trapping them,
and keeping them in shelters, all in an effort to combat animal overpopulation. Some of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Peter Singer, the author of Animal Liberation, states that human–to–human equality should be extended to animals because humans and animals both
possess the same perception of pain. Singer says, "Nearly all the external signs that lead us to infer pain in other humans can be seen in other species,
especially the species most closely related to us – the species of mammals and birds" (Singer 11). Singer states his personal view on animal rights. Many
people hold similar views, and these people believe that the issue of animal overpopulation should be addressed by means that most benefit animals.
This type of view clashes with views that humans' needs must come first. Even among thosewithin this group of people who prioritize animals, there
are disputes about how to most ethically treat animals. Some oppose animal sterilization, while others believe it is a completely humane practice, again,
therefore yielding no conclusive solution to the

Animal Rights And Human Rights
Animal Rights "Nearly as many, 68 percent, were concerned or very concerned about the well–being of animals used in 'sports' or contests as well as
animals in laboratories (67 percent) (Kretzer, 1)." Many people question whether an animal is capable of thought and emotions. Others feel as though
animals are the equivalent of humans and should be treated as such. Since the 1800's, animal rights has been a topic that has several different sides
including two extremes. If animals can react to their environment, emote, and are aware of things done to or with them, then they should have
similar rights to humans. Some of us have animals as pets, for competitions, for our jobs, and some to survive. Much like tasking asked of humans
in day to day life. Those of us who have pets, see them as a part of the family, making us believe they are no different than a child we gave birth to.
When we bring home our new born children, we love them, nurture them, and teach them as they grow to be adults. What happens to most families
when they bring home their sweet little puppies, kittens, or other baby animal of our choosing? I would imagine that the goal is to raise them to adapt
to their new family. This is no different than that of a small child. Looking at a behavioral stand point and comparing household pets tohuman beings,
the reactions are very similar. When children are physically and mentally abused on a regular basis, the smallest act may have a similar reaction as that
of a

Animal Rights At Factory Farms
Madison Bowdish
Dr. Brian Onishi
PHIL 229
15 Dec 2016
Animal Rights in Factory Farms The idea that industrial farming is bad for the environment is well known, but what people do not think about is
horrible practice of factory farms within industrial farming. Factory farms are inhumane and not only because the animal is being slaughtered, but
because of the way the animals are treated before the are killed. A person would think that if they were to be innocently killed that they would want to
be treated with respect and dignity before they die. In this paper, I will argue that animals have rights through a utilitarian view and that they should not
be treated in an inhumane way. The framework I plan to discuss isPeter Singer 's utilitarian view on animal rights. A general idea of whatutilitarianism
is can be described as the need for the many outweigh the needs of a few, or "majority rule" when it comes to happiness. Singer's criteria for how a
being gets rights is based on the ability to feel pleasure or pain. With this criteria it allows people who are mentally handicapped, the senile, and
babies to have rights (Hozien). Most would agree that it would be cruel to not give these people rights, so Singer argues that since animals can feel
pain and pleasure they also have rights. Although he believes that they should be treated equal he does admit that there is a range or difference of pain.
He equates this to racism or in this case speciesism. For instance he states that

Peta Animal Rights
"Although we have, in theory, abolished human slavery, recognized women's rights, and stopped child labor, we continue to enslave other species
who, if we simply pay attention, show quite clearly that they experience parental love, pain, and the desire for freedom, just as we do" once said
Ingrid Newkirk, beloved animal rights activist and cofounder of the largest animal rights organizations, PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of
Animals. There is a much bigger picture than which lies centered on the human species. Earth is inhabited with a rich variety of about eight million
species, most of which have been thought to exist for millions of years before humans evolved. The array of diversity of life on our planet is mind
blowing, however, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The admired biologist and conservationist E.O. Wilson once said, "we should preserve every scrap of biodiversity as priceless while we learn to use
it and come to understand what it means to humanity." This quote seems to encompass the overall main goal of zoologists: to preserve biodiversity,
and while we have it, study and examine it, and make discoveries that could help save all those on this planet. Dr. Tim Cockerel, in a published
interview with BBC, defined his job as a zoologist as someone who studies species from anything to the diversity of animals, to how animals interact
with other living things, to how animals and humans interact with each other, and how we can make plans to save threatened or endangered species
for the future years to come (Cockerill). The typical zoologist observes animals in a variety of settings, while studying behavioral tendencies, their
natural habitat, and how their acquired traits are passed down from generation to generation. Some daily activities of a zoologist include dissection of
animal specimens, preparation of slides of disease tissue under microscopes, studying aggression or mating behaviors, testing the effects of drugs on
animals, and directing biological technicians who work alongside them. They may write scientific reports, inventory or estimate wildlife populations,
consult with management systems, must articulate well and understand others. Many people who are involved in this field publish articles about their
recent research. The typical employers of zoologists include government departments, universities, private research firms, biotechnology companies,
zoos, wildlife sanctuaries, pharmaceutical agriculture, or food research companies, environmental consulting firms, and possibly other private
organizations. A zoologist may

Animals And Animal Rights

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jenny Schickling

More from Jenny Schickling (9)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Animals And Animal Rights