ahjgf

1. PRESENTCITY| KUALA LUMPUR
 Capital city of Malaysia that act as the centre of the parliament activity
and also for business purposes.
 Kuala Lumpur also hold for other activities such as entertainment ex:
Pavillion, Berjaya Times Square.
 The public transportation in kuala lumpur can be consider as moderate
because it does not cover all of kuala lumpur just towards the major parts
in the city.
 The road traffic in kuala lumpur is also consider to be dreadful especially
during the peak hours.
 This is cause by the incapability of the public transport provided by the
government to supportthe need of the people there to reach their
destination.
 The layout of the city is to be consider as unorganized compare to other
major cities around the world becausekuala lumpur is contructed during
the world war II era when british invade Malaysia during the war.
 The result of the war cause the construction of the city to be out of place
for the most part of the capital where everything is centre towards the
middle of the city from business to entertainment purposes.

2. PRESENTCITY| PUTRAJAYA
 Putrajaya jaya is used to serve as the federal administrative centre of
Malaysia.
 Putrajaya is constructed due to the overcrowded of kuala lumpur.
 Putrajaya is thought out to be a planned city with the latest
communication technologies and progressive infrastructure.
 The streets are elegantly designed with a European feel, along with
well-paved roads while the government buildings are a blend of
modern architecture with Islamic arts.
 Commercial, authoritative and residential areas have been divided into
precincts that blend into each other cohesively.
 The setback of this city is the transportation. The only railway it has is
the transit to KLIA. It was planned a monorail to be constructed but it
was suspended due to insufficient funds.

3. SUMMARY:
 From what I have gather between this two city is that both have their
advantages but it also has it flaws
 Between the two city one has a good transportation system the other is
a well thought out city.
 with this I can take the the pros and cons of both city to inspired me
to start on the planned of my city.

4. FUTURE CITY
AIM
The type of city that I was assigned is a floating water city. From the research
that I have gather from the other cities I took the pros and cons of the city to be
used in the city that I will developed.
I decide to create an eco-friendly and also a self-sustainable city that can
accommodateall the need of the residents living inside the city.
CONCEPT
The conceptthat I proposeforthe city is by le Corbusier where the main capital
of the city is located in the middle of the city surrounded by commercial and
residential area. This to avoid the traffic and transportation problem. I will focus
on more on public transport so that the citizens will not be bother by traffic jam.
Furthermore, I will separate the city into a few section which to accommodate
the needs of the citizen such as I will provide building from the low cost, mid
costand high end residents. This able the any resident to afford living is such a
city.
I will have a few spherical shape district surrounding the major city. It also is
provided with about 48%-80% greenspace to suffice the oxygen need and also
climate of the city.

5. TRANSPORATION
I have research a few cities and other soonto build city such as venice, Italy
where the city is surrounded by water. I have took this as and inspiration to the
transportation that I will provide to the citizens. The city is mostly surrounded
by water, in conjunction to that aspectI consider to build a water transportation
system where I will provide a boating system and also submarine system for
underwater transport. For travel to other countries I proposeto use air
transportation.
 To sum up the city will have:
 Water transportation (boats/submarine for domestic purposes)
 Air transportation(airport to travel outside of the city)
ENERGY
The type of energy that the city will be mainly focus on is tidal and solar
energy. I chosethis sources becauseit suits to the city surroundings. The city
can be generated by hydroelectric that is provided from surrounded sea waves.

6. INSPIRATION
In japan, they have plan to build a floating city. I took this idea as an inspiration
to my city.
The 3 Parts of Ocean Spiral:
1. The first part is the floating surface, which will be topped by a 500-meter
sphere.
2. the central part is a spiral 15km long with room for business zones,
apartments, residential areas and hotel rooms for 5000 people.
3. At the very bottom at about 3000 to 4000 thousand meters under the sea the
spiral will be linked to an “earth-factory” – a research center for developing
energy sources.
I will incorporate the main concept that I will be using into the final design of the
city.