This document discusses supporting qualitative data needs and summarizes discussions from groups on this topic. It was noted that while numbers typically carry more weight, some funders are starting to value qualitative data like stories and learning. Groups said they collect a lot of qualitative data but don't often analyze it systematically. The document outlines methods and tools used in a past qualitative data project, including interviews, thematic analysis, and journey mapping. Challenges collecting and analyzing qualitative data are discussed. Next steps proposed include considering achievable options for small groups and developing tools or training.
4. Groups said
✔Data is typically synonymous with
numbers.
✔Numbers carry more weight with funders.
✔Funders are changing. Some value
qualitative data (stories, learning) more.
✔Stories used to back other insights when
improving practice
✔Collecting and using statistics / numbers
can perpetuate harm
✔Qualitative methods, such as peer research
and co-design can shift balance of power
5. Groups said
✔They collect a lot of qualitative data.
✔Many undertook their own projects.
✔Most don’t analyse this data methodically.
✔Tools are designed for academic use.
✔They are costly and not user friendly.
6. Research is so important,
especially when it comes
from us, because we are
service user-led and we
have lived experience.
10. Our reflections
✔It takes a long long time!
✔Canva did help synthesise analysis
✔Newer tools like Quirkos are relatively
cheap and easy to use (tested recently)
✔Digital coding could be helpful to give
weight to swamps/ challenges
✔And to organise / revisit insights
✔But Google Docs did work well enough -
relatively straightforward themes
✔Spreadsheets helped for more complex
coding (CRM challenges)
11. AI tools: GPT4
Are there opportunities for small
organisations to use AI?
12. AI tools: Ask CSV
Are there opportunities for small
organisations to use AI?