SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
CYBERTECH Presented by group 11 –  AnurajAntil Ishan Malik Kanishka Singh Sunny Malik Surya Deswal
POINTS OF FAILURE High initial cost Efficiency  Lack of skilled manpower Seasonal effects Selling as whole not module by module High operating cost
HIGH INITIAL COST To implement cybertech it required a high initial cost which most firms were unwilling to spend. The cost of the system was 13 million australian dollars but this cost had to be bought down to 5 million australian dollars for it to be viable.  Also the floor area required for the project was 1.5 times more as compared to the conventional plants which added to the cost.
EFFICIENCY The plant was not running efficiently as expected at Wollagong. Plant ran at 80% uptime versus 99.5% as specified. Also it was running at the same operating speed as compared to conventional plants.
LACK OF SKILLED MANPOWER To work on cybertech skilled workforce is required. According to australian bureau of statistics majority of workers were had fewer skills or were semi skilled. Also culturally people didn’t preferred working in meat companies. Training people to work on cybertech would add up to the cost incurred by the firm in addition to the setup costs.
SEASONAL EFFECTS When there were rains or due to some other reasons production was less or was stopped workers couldn’t be laid off as lot of expenditure was required to train them to make them skilled to work on machines as compared to conventional plants. This would result in incurring more costs in times of less or no production.
SELLING AS WHOLE NOT MODULE BY MODULE Cybertech was to be sold as a whole products not in parts(modules). This led to huge investment for the firm willing to install cybertech. Due to this small firms were unable or unwilling to buy this. Alternatively if it was to be sold module by module it would have fetched more revenues and more firms would have benefitted from this project. This alternative would have led to more flexibility in level of automation as desired by firms according to their resources.
HIGH OPERATING COST For the cybertech 2 the minimum quantity to be produced for the plant to be cost effective came out to be 4827.2 tonnes for the year 1994 as compared to 1723.5 tonnes for the phoenix plant.  It is the break even quantity.
THANK YOU

More Related Content

Similar to Cybertech

Emerson Migration Services
Emerson Migration ServicesEmerson Migration Services
Emerson Migration Services
Sumeet Goel
 
Renaissance Repair And Supply Overview
Renaissance Repair And Supply OverviewRenaissance Repair And Supply Overview
Renaissance Repair And Supply Overview
lenanderson
 
Ch7 Strategy and Technology_updated.ppt
Ch7 Strategy and Technology_updated.pptCh7 Strategy and Technology_updated.ppt
Ch7 Strategy and Technology_updated.ppt
ZeeshanZahoorSyed
 
IT Simplification PowerPoint Presentation Slides
IT Simplification PowerPoint Presentation Slides IT Simplification PowerPoint Presentation Slides
IT Simplification PowerPoint Presentation Slides
SlideTeam
 

Similar to Cybertech (20)

Emerson Migration Services
Emerson Migration ServicesEmerson Migration Services
Emerson Migration Services
 
Unit 3.4
Unit 3.4Unit 3.4
Unit 3.4
 
Robotic Process Automation - An Overview
Robotic Process Automation - An Overview Robotic Process Automation - An Overview
Robotic Process Automation - An Overview
 
Renaissance Repair And Supply Overview
Renaissance Repair And Supply OverviewRenaissance Repair And Supply Overview
Renaissance Repair And Supply Overview
 
Renaissance Repair And Supply Overview
Renaissance Repair And Supply OverviewRenaissance Repair And Supply Overview
Renaissance Repair And Supply Overview
 
American Connector
American ConnectorAmerican Connector
American Connector
 
Smart Industry
Smart IndustrySmart Industry
Smart Industry
 
Economies and diseconomies of scale
Economies and diseconomies of scaleEconomies and diseconomies of scale
Economies and diseconomies of scale
 
Low Code Platform
Low Code PlatformLow Code Platform
Low Code Platform
 
Low Code Application Development Platform
Low Code Application Development PlatformLow Code Application Development Platform
Low Code Application Development Platform
 
INFOGRAPHIC: The Game of IT Infrastructure: Cloud vs In-House IT Infrastructure
INFOGRAPHIC: The Game of IT Infrastructure: Cloud vs In-House IT InfrastructureINFOGRAPHIC: The Game of IT Infrastructure: Cloud vs In-House IT Infrastructure
INFOGRAPHIC: The Game of IT Infrastructure: Cloud vs In-House IT Infrastructure
 
Low cost automation
Low cost automationLow cost automation
Low cost automation
 
The Cost Crisis
The Cost CrisisThe Cost Crisis
The Cost Crisis
 
Advantages Of Robotic Machine In Industries - Grind Master
Advantages Of Robotic Machine In Industries - Grind MasterAdvantages Of Robotic Machine In Industries - Grind Master
Advantages Of Robotic Machine In Industries - Grind Master
 
Plant Layout.ppt
Plant Layout.pptPlant Layout.ppt
Plant Layout.ppt
 
The Starting of the Third Industrial Revolution
The Starting of the Third Industrial RevolutionThe Starting of the Third Industrial Revolution
The Starting of the Third Industrial Revolution
 
Jy2417091713
Jy2417091713Jy2417091713
Jy2417091713
 
Prioritizing waste reduction projects
Prioritizing waste reduction projectsPrioritizing waste reduction projects
Prioritizing waste reduction projects
 
Ch7 Strategy and Technology_updated.ppt
Ch7 Strategy and Technology_updated.pptCh7 Strategy and Technology_updated.ppt
Ch7 Strategy and Technology_updated.ppt
 
IT Simplification PowerPoint Presentation Slides
IT Simplification PowerPoint Presentation Slides IT Simplification PowerPoint Presentation Slides
IT Simplification PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 

Cybertech

  • 1. CYBERTECH Presented by group 11 – AnurajAntil Ishan Malik Kanishka Singh Sunny Malik Surya Deswal
  • 2. POINTS OF FAILURE High initial cost Efficiency Lack of skilled manpower Seasonal effects Selling as whole not module by module High operating cost
  • 3. HIGH INITIAL COST To implement cybertech it required a high initial cost which most firms were unwilling to spend. The cost of the system was 13 million australian dollars but this cost had to be bought down to 5 million australian dollars for it to be viable. Also the floor area required for the project was 1.5 times more as compared to the conventional plants which added to the cost.
  • 4. EFFICIENCY The plant was not running efficiently as expected at Wollagong. Plant ran at 80% uptime versus 99.5% as specified. Also it was running at the same operating speed as compared to conventional plants.
  • 5. LACK OF SKILLED MANPOWER To work on cybertech skilled workforce is required. According to australian bureau of statistics majority of workers were had fewer skills or were semi skilled. Also culturally people didn’t preferred working in meat companies. Training people to work on cybertech would add up to the cost incurred by the firm in addition to the setup costs.
  • 6. SEASONAL EFFECTS When there were rains or due to some other reasons production was less or was stopped workers couldn’t be laid off as lot of expenditure was required to train them to make them skilled to work on machines as compared to conventional plants. This would result in incurring more costs in times of less or no production.
  • 7. SELLING AS WHOLE NOT MODULE BY MODULE Cybertech was to be sold as a whole products not in parts(modules). This led to huge investment for the firm willing to install cybertech. Due to this small firms were unable or unwilling to buy this. Alternatively if it was to be sold module by module it would have fetched more revenues and more firms would have benefitted from this project. This alternative would have led to more flexibility in level of automation as desired by firms according to their resources.
  • 8. HIGH OPERATING COST For the cybertech 2 the minimum quantity to be produced for the plant to be cost effective came out to be 4827.2 tonnes for the year 1994 as compared to 1723.5 tonnes for the phoenix plant. It is the break even quantity.