Hi I would like you to write a simple response, just reply to these 2 students discussions with 100 words each. please use your own words do not copy any thing from the internet. please no plagiarism. here is the first one   Human rights should not have to take a back seat to anything. In my opinion, I am glad to see the US talking to new nations and working together. Egypt and the US both have a common enemy and a mutual hatred for terrorism. To me terrorism is a human rights issue. When people have to live in fear from doing their daily routine because they are scared that a truck will plow into the marketplace or a car bomb will go off there is a human rights issue there. We could not solely fix every nations problems for example the Syrian issue needs to be tackled from within Syria. Just recently a gas attack was responsible for over 100 deaths claimed to be the work of Assad. There is a human rights issue there but that doesn’t mean the US has to rush to the rescue. Another example can be North Korea. North Korea is a literally a ticking time bomb. They have some serious human rights issues because their citizens are poor, hungry, and brainwashed by the government. It is a terrible thing but the US cannot rush in and fix the issue because we cannot afford another conflict. Human rights issues I believe need to be fixed within. Two world leaders meeting on the topic of terrorism does not mean they both do not care about the human rights of other nations. Here is the second one I personal think that bringing someone who is a dictator to our country was not the best look on our part. However I think them talking about the security issues is important. Them discussing issues like terrorism is important because that is a major issue in the world right now that will eventually effect everyone. I believe that the more countries that start to take a stand against terrorism the easier it will probably be to fight the issue together. Although human rights are a major importance to our country some times we need to put them aside to get a bigger issues handled. I don't think that we should partake in the issue as a country but I also don't believe we should start an issue over human rights with political leaders because trying to take down political leaders in the past has only worked against us. I believe that if there becomes a most present issue of human rights than we will need to take a stand but currently it isn't affecting our country personally so we should be putting bigger issues like terrorism first. I think eventually there will become an issue with human rights so eventually this will be an issue that needs the time an attention just now isn't the time for that. .

1. Hi I would like you to write a simple response, just reply to
these 2 students discussions with 100 words each. please use
your own words do not copy any thing from the internet.
please no plagiarism.
here is the first one
Human rights should not have to take a back seat to anything.
In my opinion, I am glad to see the US talking to new nations
and working together. Egypt and the US both have a common
enemy and a mutual hatred for terrorism. To me terrorism is a
human rights issue. When people have to live in fear from doing
their daily routine because they are scared that a truck will plow
into the marketplace or a car bomb will go off there is a human
rights issue there. We could not solely fix every nations
problems for example the Syrian issue needs to be tackled from
within Syria. Just recently a gas attack was responsible for over
100 deaths claimed to be the work of Assad. There is a human
rights issue there but that doesn’t mean the US has to rush to
the rescue. Another example can be North Korea. North Korea
is a literally a ticking time bomb. They have some serious
human rights issues because their citizens are poor, hungry, and
brainwashed by the government. It is a terrible thing but the US
cannot rush in and fix the issue because we cannot afford
another conflict. Human rights issues I believe need to be fixed
within. Two world leaders meeting on the topic of terrorism
does not mean they both do not care about the human rights of
other nations.
Here is the second one
I personal think that bringing someone who is a dictator to our

2. country was not the best look on our part. However I think them
talking about the security issues is important. Them discussing
issues like terrorism is important because that is a major issue
in the world right now that will eventually effect everyone. I
believe that the more countries that start to take a stand against
terrorism the easier it will probably be to fight the issue
together. Although human rights are a major importance to our
country some times we need to put them aside to get a bigger
issues handled. I don't think that we should partake in the issue
as a country but I also don't believe we should start an issue
over human rights with political leaders because trying to take
down political leaders in the past has only worked against us. I
believe that if there becomes a most present issue of human
rights than we will need to take a stand but currently it isn't
affecting our country personally so we should be putting bigger
issues like terrorism first. I think eventually there will become
an issue with human rights so eventually this will be an issue
that needs the time an attention just now isn't the time for that.