Emancipation Proclamation Essay

Emancipation Proclamation Essay
A soldier's plight to take up arms and answer the nation's call usually is not met with resistance.
However the path to service for the 54th Massachusetts' all black infantry regiment was different
than most soldiers. On January 1, 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation presented an opportunity for
freed slaves in the north to fight for their cause. Thus allowing the 54th Massachusetts Infantry
Regiment to organize and prepare to join the Union's army in the Civil War. The assault on Battery
Wagner would be the first Civil War battle in which black troops had the opportunity to demonstrate
that they could equal their white comrades in courage and determination. President Lincoln would
believe the Emancipation Proclamation was a morally correct path. President Abraham Lincoln
attempted to frame the Emancipation Proclamation as way to preserve the Union and fend off state
secession versus the abolition of slavery. Although not abolitionist, Lincoln's attitudes toward
slavery, race, and Southerners shaped his public positions. He pictured slavery as a menace to white
America and an immediate threat to the interests of white men. He depicted slavery as invading not
only the territories but the free states as well (Escott, 2014). Before he became president he was
staunchly against the expansion of slavery and vigorously rejected that label. Further growth amid
the crisis of war would eventually make him an emancipator (Escott, 2014). He knew that
Northerners would not
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 was issued to abolish slavery by freeing African American
slaves. The Proclamation later leaded to the thirteenth amendment. Also, it granted African
Americans the opportunity to "fight" for their injustices and the pursuit of happiness. Once this was
in place, it represented a start for equality. In contrary, segregation still continued but in a legalized
manner. Behind the scenes, the people that were in power wanted to remain in control. Our
racialized wealth gap did not end with the signing of the Emancipation. Our historical leaders
summoned to continue marginalization against African American systematically. Slavery had gained
another name. Laws and legislations were put into place by state and federal governments such as
black codes, unjust imprisonments, and enforced white privilege. These practices were put into
place to keep African American people subordinate in t our capitalist society. African American
people did not benefit nearly as much as white people did during the post–slavery time. The laws
were intentionally set to preserve and accommodate the aspects of Jim Crow. However, in the land
of the free, minorities have been confined to specific areas of cities due to the lack of housing
opportunities which existed for white people. For many black people in America the GI bill did not
grant the same advancements which limited their mobility for generations to come.
It started with the passing of the Emancipation of

On January 1, 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation was delivered by Abraham Lincoln. This bold
and progressive move by the President declared that "all persons held as slaves within any State or
designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States,
shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free" (The Library of Congress, 2014). While Lincoln now
harbors the fame for ending slavery, his proclamation initially only ended slavery in those states that
attempted to separate from the union. The proclamation authorized the recruitment of former slaves
into the Union Armies and promoted the eventual creation of a Union without slavery. It was this
strategic use of the legal system that allowed...show more content...
Skills that are acquired through having a traditional paying job such as budgeting, saving, shopping
were not developed nor provided while enslaved. The Masters also never taught the slaves how to
care for themselves and without money or education, they also now faced major health concerns.
Poorly clothed, homeless and malnourished, the newly freed slaves were exposed to many
diseases. Yellow fever, dysentery and other diseases killed off approximatley1 million former
slaves. That is a staggering number as it does not take in account the number of slaves that were
lynched, beaten or worked to death by former slave owners or by Klansmen. Additionally, this
number does not consider the amount of runaways that fought and died for the Union armies.
Many runaway slaves perusing freedom enlisted in the Union army to protect themselves and their
families, under the assumption they would eventually gain their freedom. "Historians of the Civil
War have long acknowledged that two–thirds of all military casualties came from disease rather than
heroic battle" (Schuessler, 2012), thus many of these runaways never received true emancipation.
For those that did survive, they were living in horrible conditions that multiplied the aforementioned
conditions for these now 'freed' people.
At wars end, the Former slaves faced a huge health crisis as the smallpox epidemic spread through
the South to freed slaves traveling to the

The Emancipation Proclamation, By Abraham Lincoln
The story takes place in the late part of the American civil war, probably the end. The Civil War
was a fight between the United States (the north) and the Confederate States (the south). It ended
with the slavery got abolished. This is shown in the text, where the Union boy tells the slaves
"you're free to do as you like." and shows the Emancipation Proclamation that was written by
Abraham Lincoln, the president of the United States. The Proclamation says that slaves are set to
be "free" in slave states. The times before this Proclamation have been a repression of blacks. The
blacks was often slaves, and with no rights in the confederate states. The confederate states were
also known as slave states. Here slavery was abundant, and often a...show more content...
A third person narrator is the most reliable narrator, because it is not as subjective as a first person
narrator. This gives the story a more in depth view of all the characters, rather than one of them.
This is to create a more realistic view of the story all–together, and the lives of slaves after the
Proclamation. A third person narrator makes the reader think about how other people are
thinking. This is to make it harder or easier for the reader to interpret, why people in the story
deal with situations as they do. In this story it is fairly simple why the slaves and the slave master
behaves the way they do, because of the simplicity of the plot. There are three slaves, to field
workers and one maid. The maid is called Martha, and is fairly loyal to her owner. This is
probably because the maids was used to have sex with, and therefore the working conditions for
maids was often much better than the field worker's working conditions. Martha is also forced to
sleep with her master. Martha is also very skeptic of the Union boy's statement calling them
freemen "Martha, convinced that the boy from the Union had been mistaken, that he was too
young and underqualified to confer freedom upon anyone" this is probably because she can see
the consequences of freedom, in a country where blacks a look upon as slaves. The field workers,
Mikey and Tommy, on the other hand were often the owner's scapegoats to make up for the owners
misdeeds. Especially Mikey, who has been used as a scapegoat for a crime he did not commit
"Sterling thought nothing of blaming Mikey, and Sterling's father whipped Mikey with a severity
the eight–year–old never forgot". The slave master, Mr. Sterling Gage, has inherited the plantation
from his father. You can think of the Gage family as being a slave owner family. Mr. Sterling is a
harsh slave owner, and probably a dominating being. If something is not going his way, he will
punish someone. He

Essay On The Emancipation Proclamation
In April of 1865, the President of the United States was shot in the back of the head in the middle
of a crowded theater. The audience panicked, the assassin made his escape, and the unconscious
president was carried to a cramped bedroom in a house across the street from Ford's Theatre. A few
hours later, Abraham Lincoln died. For the first time in the nation's history, a president had been
assassinated. But it was only one of the dramatic changes that shaped the United States in 1865. Four
years of civil war––by far the single bloodiest conflict in American history––finally drew to a close.
The Union Army victorious, politicians now faced the question of how to reunite a shattered nation.
And still, another change was emerging––one that would not be decided by violence and bloodshed,
but that would have just as dramatic an effect in redefining America's social, political, and economic
life. The time had finally come to address America's original sin––the legal question of slavery's
abolition would finally be resolved. Two years previously, on January 1, 1863, President Lincoln
issued what we now call the Emancipation Proclamation. Through this executive order, every
enslaved person living in areas controlled by the Confederacy was now, legally, freed. Though this
action would earn Lincoln noble nicknames like "The Liberator" and "The Great Emancipator," the
legal repercussions of the act were ambiguous at best. Many questioned the president's authority to

Emancipation Proclamation
On September 22, 1862, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, issued the first, or
preliminary, Emancipation Proclamation. In this document he warned that unless the states of the
Confederacy returned to the Union by January 1, 1863, he would declare their slaves to be
"forever free." During the Civil War, he was fighting to save the Union and trying not to free the
slaves. Lincoln was quoted to say, "I am not, nor have ever been in favor of bringing about in any
way the social and political equality of the white and black races." The Emancipation Proclamation
illustrated this view. Lincoln had been unenthusiastic to come to this position. Not only did he
believe he had no legal right to...show more content...
On January 1, 1963, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared all slaves in
Confederate controlled areas liberated. The document contained specific details regarding
freedom for slaves. Lincoln was quoted saying to the Secretary of State, "If I could save the
Union without freeing any slaves, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I
would do it; and if I could do it by freeing some slaves, I would also do that." The latter is what
was attained. While it declared slaves free in most Southern states, some select areas were exempted
whilst others were not mentioned at all. Lincoln feared that these "border states", where slavery was
legal, would likewise join the Confederacy if they were included in the proclamation. The "border
states" had decided to stay in the Union when other southern states seceded in 1861. The
Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the United States. In the first place, it did not
apply to the border states where slavery was a problem, for reason that it did not secede. Secondly,
much of the territory to which the proclamation was applied to was beyond the power of the Federal
government, and therefore, it could not be enforced thoroughly. Finally, even Lincoln doubted it
would be held legal in peacetime. While the war lasted, most of the slaves remained loyal to their
masters. But it satisfied the North who demanded antislavery mandates. The

How did slaves turn the war for the Union into a war for liberation? Slaves turn the war in favor of
the Union when the Emancipation Proclamation was added to the Constitution. The Emancipation
Proclamation, which declared slaves in Confederate–held territory to be free and at some point freed
all slaves free in Union controlled areas. The Emancipation Proclamation alter the course of the
Civil War and change the course of American History because it led to the enlisting of blacks
troops in the Union army in both the North and South. By the end of the war more than 1800,000
black men had served in the army with another 24,000 in the navy on the side of the Unions Army.
Most of the soldiers who join were emancipated slaves that joined the

The author doesn't really explain what reconstruction is besides that the author says that it was a
time after the civil war. Since the author doesn't say much about the time period after the civil war
the article just goes right into talking about the Emancipation Proclamation. The Emancipation
Proclamation was a document that stated all people who have held a slaves in the states that had
left the union was free.(legal freedom) Since the Proclamation only said that sates that had left the
union were free meant that all slaves were not free. Later on in 1865 the 13th amendment was
made and declared all slaves free but that still didn't mean that some of the slaves were out of the
clear yet. Even though it says that all slaves were there was

"O Captain! my Captain! Our fearful trip is done, The ship has weather'd every rack, the prize we
sought is won." Walt Whitman, an American essayist, poet, and journalist, illustrates Abraham
Lincoln's accomplishment of saving the Union, and he captures the variety of emotions that it
provoked. Still, Lincoln is remembered as a legend, and his political endeavors are highly
emphasized in American history. Although the vast majority of people agree that Lincoln was,
indeed, a heroic man, some question the importance of his undertakings. Lincoln's actions, such as
continuing with the presidential election, issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, and delivering the
Gettysburg Address, are what make him a legend.
Allowing the presidential election to continue contributed to Lincoln's admirability, and was a
triumph for democracy. Lincoln was dedicated to the cause of democracy, and he was determined to
help it thrive in America and everywhere in the world. When the election came...show more content...
In the taxing process of saving the Union, Lincoln managed to write a document for the purpose of
freeing the slaves. Though this operation aroused an overwhelming amount of controversy, the
controversy is a significant part of Lincoln's legacy. Despite the fact that the Emancipation
Proclamation is considered to be one of Lincoln's most admired achievements, some claim that he did
not deserve this praise. Furthermore, they argue that the importance of his action was exaggerated.
However, by issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln assisted in freeing the slaves by
encouraging them to free themselves. As "The Great Emancipator" mentions, "Lincoln's
proclamation was a moral landmark. It also was a political stroke of genius that began the
long–overdue process of crushing slavery." Throughout the entirety of his presidency, Lincoln
invested himself in extinguishing slavery, one of America's greatest

President Abraham Lincoln was faced with an incredible test in his terms as President of the
United States trying to rejoin the crushed parts of the Confederacy and Union. This was his sole
reason in freeing the slaves. In any case, Lincoln was against freeing the slaves but realize it would
weaken the Confederacy. On January 1, 1863 Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, making
the slaves free, and protecting the Union. Lincoln liberated the slaves to weaken the Southern
protection, fortify the Federal government, and urge free blacks to battle with the Union,
subsequently saving the Union.
President Lincoln once said that if he could save the Union without freeing any slave he would do
it. However, Lincoln soon realized that freeing the slaves could provide a huge advantage for the
North both economically and politically. Economically, the South came to rely on slave labor so
much that their entire economy would collapse without it. Lincoln realized this in 1862 when he
said that " what I do about slavery and the colored race, I do because it helps save the Union."(pg 39)
By issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln hoped that slaves living on Southern plantations
would revolt against their masters, thereby drawing off the South work supply, A small economic
difference like this could tip the scale in the favor of Lincoln and the Union. Furthermore, Lincoln
realized that the Emancipation Proclamation would benefit the United States foreign relations in

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." The
16th president of the United States, Abraham Lincoln once said. Abraham Lincoln can be noted as
the most quintessential people in history. He issued many speeches that impacted the modern world
today, such as, the Gettysburg Address, House Divided Speech, Lincoln–Douglas debate, but most
notably the Emancipation Proclamation. Perspective has varied about the purpose of this document
for years, due to the fact of its romanticizing nature. The time of the Civil War was a rough year for
all divided groups. Every step, anyone made in the prior years, were unquestionably significant.
Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a...show more content...
These reasons factor into why the Emancipation Proclamation could be considered a political
document, by drawing a line in the sand between the Union and the Confederacy. It was also
declared "a gross violation of the wages of civilized warfare." (Wilbur) Many were disappointed
as Lincoln abandoned the "rose water" approach to war, which approaches a conflict in a hasty
manner. (Witt) Rightful to his religion, the proposal shadowed Lincoln's religion was followed in
his speeches and presidency. It could be thought that since he is only focusing on his religion, other
people might be singled out due to the variety of religion in various parts of the world. However, the
United States was acknowledged as a Christian capital, with Christianity as the dominant religion
with two–thirds of people being followers of the religion. Lincoln also believed that "every man
should enjoy the fruit of his own labor." (Reed) It is still believed today, in the modern values and
beliefs that everyone should deserve the beneficial, profitable hard–working labor the workforce
does today. Not only did this for document have many possible outcomes, Lincoln poured is soul
into such a problematic rebellion. (Curated Grouping) With possible outcomes, Union defeated
Confederates quicker, Union would've been left intact. These causes helped organize modern laws
for the new days of warfare. (Schwartz)

Emancipation Proclamation Research Paper
The Emancipation Proclamation
Growing up in an African American Baptist church I never realized the importance of Watch Night
service. The Watch Night service can be drawn back to get–togethers also known as "Freedom's
Eve." On that night of December 31, 1862, Black slaves and freed blacks originated together in
private homes and churches all across the country awaiting on the news that the Emancipation
Proclamation actually had become a law. (The First Watch Night Service Occurs).
On January1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln delivered the Emancipation Proclamation, while the
nation was coming near its third year of the bloody civil war. The proclamation affirmed "that all
persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforward

The emancipation proclamation was an order signed by president Abraham Lincoln during the
American Civil War in attempt to abolish slavery in the ten rebellion states in the confederacy. The
order took effect on January 1, 1863 in attempts to free more than 3.5 million slaves in the
confederate area where they rebelled against the Union, and to maintain apprehended freedom
between the newly freed slaves and the federal government and military. This was a turning point in
the Civil war as Abraham lincoln changed the focal point of the war from secession to slavery,
which the South [Jefferson Davis] didn't want to occur, in fear of losing foreign allies, such as
anti–slavery Great Britain. The North really increased their chances of...show more content...
In the third document, "Border States Are Alarmed ( 1862), a document cited by George D Prentice
a South adopted Connecticut Yankee who spoke on behalf of Kentucky and his unwillingness to the
emancipation proclamation who claims that the order is unjust and mischievous, that if carried out
shall only be harmful, though admitted it would be helpful against the enemy [South]. Prentice
speaks thoroughly on his unwillingness as a representative of Kentucky to take on such an order, he
believes it is an act that shall never really be abolished, though attempted. He clings to the fact that
Lincoln is just a temporary occupant of the executive chair and is of little worth, that slavery is an
institution installed from the "government our fathers framed" which will withstand through the
emancipation proclamation. The document ended by Prentice stating that Kentucky would resist the
act. In the fourth document, "Lincoln's Hometown Applauds (1862), a article from the Illinois State
Journal of Springfield President Lincoln is acknowledging Lincoln's signing of the act as a much
waited for action that could no longer be prolonged. They describe the act to be the most memorable
and important of his career. This article also speaks on the proclamation as something that needed to
happen briefly proving that Lincoln

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq Essay
Chapter 14–Question 1: Analyze how the Emancipation Proclamation was both a reaction to the
changing relationship between whites and blacks, and how it continued to change that relationship.
Answer: The Emancipation Proclamation, issued on January 1, 1863, was a declaration made by
President Lincoln during the Civil War, which liberated colored slaves in all Confederate states
(Fraser 394). While the North's government did not hold any power to enforce its practice in the
South (even though slavery still continued in the region), the declaration managed to officially
liberate colored slaves and turn the war into a campaign against slavery (Fraser 394–395). In
addition, the Emancipation Proclamation paved the way for recruitment of many colored

The Emancipation Proclamation
The American Civil War and the ending of slavery through issuing the Emancipation Proclamation
are the two crucial events of U.S. history. Perhaps the war would not have occurred if slavery did
not exist because it is one of the main reasons that the southerners and northerners got into conflict.
However, if there was no Civil War and Lincoln did not issue the Emancipation Proclamation
declaring the freedom of all slaves in any state of the Confederate States of America, then slavery and
liberation would not have taken the same course. Thus, the Emancipation Proclamation was a
momentous event that many historians have been discussed its significance in U.S. history and that
a lot of people now are still...show more content...
The core of the controversy was neither Northern nor Southern States wanted to loose their influence
in Congress due to the admission of the new states to the Union. The Constitution did not give the
federal government powers to regulate and abolish slavery where it already existed, but it did not
predetermine the status of slavery in future state. Since the law made it possible for Congress to
impose whatever status it wished on the new states, that was where the conflict began among the
members of Congress.
Although Abraham Lincoln, U.S. president in 1860 and 1864, would come to be remembered as
the Great Emancipator, he did not begin his presidency with the goal of freeing slaves. The fact
that he opposed to slavery also did not make him believe in racial equality. Before he became
president, he did not yet think that blacks should be given all the civil rights such as voting or
serving on juries. He simply wanted to preserve the Union and to build a strong federal government.
However, people got him all wrong. The northerners voted for him in 1860 hoping that he would free
the slaves and the Southern States seceded from Union because they had misunderstood Lincoln's
original intent of maintaining the Union. Faced with different points of view, Lincoln was such a
talented politician that when it come to

Essay On Emancipation Proclamation
Abraham Lincoln (1809 – 1865)
The Emancipation Proclamation (January 1, 1863) was issued by President Lincoln as a strategic
maneuver to help end the Civil War. It proclaimed slaves in any state that was "in rebellion against
the United States" to be free. The Emancipation Proclamation was arguably the most controversial
document in Lincoln's presidency. However, he would later remark, "I never, in my life, felt more
certain that I was doing right, than I do in signing this paper." The Thirteenth Amendment to the
United States Constitution abolished slavery in 1865. It was passed just months before Abraham
Lincoln's assassination.
Benjamin Banneker (1731–1806)
Benjamin Banneker was a self–taught surveyor, inventor, and astronomer. His father was a former
slave, and his mother was the daughter of a English woman and African ex–slave. He was
befriended by George Ellicott, a Quaker and abolitionist, who owned the town's mills. They shared a
love of mathematics and astronomy, and Ellicott lent Banneker books. Banneker became a popular
almanac author and published his correspondences with the leaders of the day. In 1791, he assisted
Major Andrew Ellicott in surveying the borders of the new federal city, the District of Columbia.
Onesimus & Smallpox
Onesimus was purchased in 1706 for Cotton Mather, a prominent Boston minister. Mather cited
Onesimus as the source of a revolutionary treatment for smallpox: inoculations. Though public
opinion was against the practice,

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq
The Emancipation Proclamation proclaimed the freedom of slaves. It was issued by Abraham
Lincoln in 1863 but was it issued for the right reasons? The 1860's were a difficult time for the
United States of America. The Civil War divided the country into the South and the North. Slavery
was a big issue that caused the Civil War. TheEmancipation Proclamation was not issued for the
right reasons. It was used a blinder for slaves. Abraham Lincoln was proslavery. The freed slave
myth of the Emancipation Proclamation used slaves to gain war strategy, it did not free all of the
slaves, and Lincoln did not want to abolish slavery. In a 2009 article, History.com states, "When the
American Civil War(1861–65) began, President Abraham Lincoln carefully framed the conflict as
concerning the preservation of the Union rather than the abolition of slavery....show more content...
But by mid–1862, as thousands of slaves fled to join the invading Northern armies, Lincoln was
convinced that abolition had become a sound military strategy, as well as the morally correct
path. On September 22, soon after the Union victory at Antietam, he issued a preliminary
Emancipation Proclamation, declaring that as of January 1, 1863, all slaves in the rebellious
states "shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free" (History staff, 2009). Abraham Lincoln
only cared about creating a better Union army. He never planned to abolish slavery. Abraham
Lincoln knew that his country was for slavery. During that time period, slavery was very popular.
There were not a lot of people against slavery. Lincoln was not against slavery. He was born in the
south. Why would Abraham Lincoln go against slavery when he owned slaves? Abraham Lincoln
was just like everyone else who lived in the south. He failed to realize how important slaves

Emancipation Proclamation Analysis
E
In order to understand all the intricacies that went in to the Emancipation Proclamation you have
to go back a little further in history. You also have to understand that Lincoln was a master
politician to which some would argue has yet to be matched. Lincoln ran with the National Union
Party which wanted to end slavery. Lincoln was not proslavery however he was a politician which
dictated how he handled his beliefs in the public eye. When the Civil War broke out it was not
about slavery it was about preserving the Union. Lincoln had no idea that it would take as long as
it did or the turns it would take. Initially Lincoln and his war advisors decided to proceed with a
three prong attack they would call The Anaconda Plan. The first was to block the...show more
content...
After this was done the battle in Antietam would happen. This was also excellent timing. While the
battle was basically a draw the North was able to spin it thanks to newspaper depicting it as a win.
Lincoln seized this opportunity to send the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation. By doing this he
opened the door to his power of Commander and Chief of the United States Army. The timing of
this document was also quite timely. It was sent out 5 days after the battle of Antietam and just
hundred days before the New Year. It stated that if the Confederates stated in the war the Union
would start freeing slaves. The South did not pull out of the war as a result on January 1, 1863
Lincoln made the proclamation public. He justified doing so by stating in the proclamation that
he was the Commander and Chief and this was a necessary war measure. On this day no slaves
were technically freed since there was a restriction on who could be freed. The restriction stated
that in order for slaves to be freed they must reside in a state that was in active rebellion against the
United States. All the Union slaves were already free so it did not affect them over all but as the
Union moved into the Confederate states it affected a

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq
The Emancipation Proclamation is one of the biggest documents in the history of the United States
and its effects lasted years after its implementation. On September 22, 1862, Abraham Lincoln
announced a preliminary version of the Emancipation Proclamation (Dudley 166). This
preliminary version told the basis of President Lincoln's plan; all slaves who were living in a
seceded and rebelling area of the South would be declared "then, thenceforward, and forever free"
as of January 1, 1863 (Dudley 167). Whether or not the document would truly make a change in the
nation was something that was disputed among many during the time of its issuing. Frederick
Douglass was a widely known runaway slave turned abolitionist, speaker, and writer who promoted
...show more content...
As Mr. Douglass stated in the October 1862 issue of his newspaper, "The effect of this
paper...changes the character of the war in European eyes and gives it an important
principle...instead of national pride and interest" (Dudley 167). This quote shows that the
Emancipation Proclamation would open the eyes of European nations and show them that the
Union and Confederacy are not fighting because they had a simple disagreement and are being
petty, but rather that they are passionately fighting for what they each believe to be righteous.
Changing the views of a foreign nation is not something that could be done with a "worthless act"
that people like Mr. Vallandigham believed the Emancipation Proclamation to be. Another
statement made by Mr. Douglass goes to show how the Proclamation would have affected the war
greatly. As Mr. Douglass states, "It will disarm all purpose on the part of European Government to
intervene in favor of the rebels and thus cast off... one source of rebel power" (Dudley 167). Mr.
Vallandigham then states in his speech however that "Of what possible avail was his proclamation
of September? Did the South submit? Was she even alarmed?" (Dudley 169). One should see that
Mr. Douglass' statement disproves Mr. Vallandigham's because the South would indeed be alarmed
by the Proclamation due to its

Emancipation Proclamation: The Freedmen's Bureau
The author first starts out by saying how "Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation
Proclamation on January 1, 1863. "(Legal Freedom) This proclamation was meant to free all the
slaves that are in the states that left the Union. Although this didn't end slavery, it started showing
other slaves hope. In the text it says that "Slavery was finally ended in 1865 after the Civil War
was over. " (Legal Freedom) Now that the slaves are totally freed, they and the white people have
to learn how to be together as free people in society. In the text, it says "The Freedmen's Bureau
worked to set up schools and help former slaves find lost family members. The Bureau also tried to
help freedmen get jobs." (Creating New Lives) The Freedman's Bureau helped

Emancipation Proclamation Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Papers Writing Service

More from Papers Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Emancipation Proclamation Essay