SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
Thresholds of Detection for Falling Snow  from Satellite-Borne Active and Passive Sensors  IGARSS 2011 Vancouver, Canada Gail Skofronick Jackson Benjamin Johnson Joe Munchak NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,  Greenbelt, Maryland [email_address]
Presentation Outline ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Percentages from  Surface ,  Snow , &  Water Vapor Lake Effect 2-3km tops  (0.5 to 1.0 IWP) Synoptic 5-7km tops  (0.5 to 1.0 IWP) Blizzard ~10km tops  (0.5 to 1.0 IWP) Blizzard ~10km tops  (9 to 10 IWP) “ Surface and Atmospheric Contributions to Microwave Brightness Temperatures for Falling Snow   Events,” by Gail Skofronick-Jackson and Benjamin Johnson, JGR-Atmos, published Jan 2011. (a) (b) (a) (b) Macro and microphysical cloud characteristics affect TB signal These use dendrite snowflakes
Falling Snow Detection Thresholds ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
(1) Surface Emissivity Part 1 Urban   crop land  deciduous   evergreen/mixed   water Surface Temperature Vegetation Type Snow Depth WRF Simulations Courtesy of W.-K. Tao & team Lake Effect Case Synoptic Snow Case IWP (Jan 20 0400UTC) IWP (Jan 22 0600UTC)
Radar Calculations W-Band (-26dBZ)   Ka-Band (12dBZ)  Ku-Band (18dBZ)  Thresholds of Detection for Falling Snow from Satellite-borne Active and  Passive Sensors by G. Skofronick-Jackson, et al., IEEE TGRS, submit 9/11 These use 3-bullet rosette snowflakes
Reflectivities Depend on Particle Shape  W-Band   Ka-Band  Ku-Band
Reflectivities Depend on Particle Shape  W-Band   Ka-Band  Ku-Band  Ka
Z-Thresholds Depend on Particle Shape  Average IWC Detected   at Surface Assumed minimum instrument Z: Ku: 18 dBZ Ka: 12 dBZ W: -15 dBZ ±One std dev of variability over 11 shapes is plotted Snowflake Shape (#) Ku-Band Ka-Band W-Band Long Hex Col. (0) 0.037 0.020 0.0020 Short Hex Col. (1) 0.037 0.020 0.0019 Block Hexag. Col. (2) 0.039 0.020 0.0020 Thick Hex Plate (3) 0.035 0.019 0.0019 Thin Hex Plate (4) 0.033 0.018 0.0022 3-Bullet Rosette (5) 0.062 0.038 0.0018 4-Bullet Rosette (6) 0.065 0.052 0.0026 5-Bullet Rosette (7) 0.062 0.047 0.0022 Six Bullet Rosette (8) 0.063 0.101 0.0023 Sector Snowflake (9) 0.077 0.049 0.0018 Dendrite Snow (10) 0.079 0.145 0.0032
Radiometer Threshold Procedure Y-Axis: TBhydr – TBclearair  (with perfect surface, etc knowledge) X-Axis: IWP  (max of 6 kg/m 2 ) 3-Bullet Rosette Shape: Red Line = Land surfaces, Blue line = Water Surfaces These use 3-bullet rosette snowflakes 10V  183 ± 3V  166V  89V  37V  183 ± 7V
Radiometer Thresholds Depend on Shape 89V  166V  166V  166H  183 ± 3V  183 ± 7V  166V 22 Jan
Radiometer Thresholds Depend on Snow Vertical Structure and Surface Type Channel (GHz) Total Threshold Cutoff (rounded up) (in K) From 0.05 error in emissivity From 10 o C error in surface T From 10% change in Tprofile From 10% change in RHprof 10 25 14 10 0 0 19 25 14 10 0 0 23 25 14 10 0 0 37 25 13 10 0 0 89 25 13 9 0 0 166 20 11 8 1 1 183±3 5 1 2 1 1 183±7 15 5 6 0 1
Radiometer Thresholds Depend on Snow Vertical Structure and Surface Type Channel (GHz) Total Threshold Cutoff Average Detected IWP Lake  Effect  over  Land Detected IWP Lake Effect  over  Lakes V-pol Detected IWP Lake Effect  over  Lakes  H-pol Detected IWP Synoptic  over  Land Detected IWP Synoptic  over  Lakes  V-pol Detected IWP Synoptic  over  Lakes H-pol 10 25 19 25 23 25 3.2 na na 37 25 1.2 2.0 1.1 89 25 0.4 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 166 20 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 183±3 5 1.8 na 1.1 1.1 na 183±7 15 0.4 0.4 na 0.6 0.6 na
Active Versus Passive Snow Detection Thresholds of Detection for Falling Snow from Satellite-borne Active and  Passive Sensors by G. Skofronick-Jackson, et al., IEEE TGRS, submit 9/11 Active Avg. Surface IWC Detected:  Ku  Ka  W  Units 0.08 0.07 0.004 g m -3 Simple falling snow conversion (melted snow rate) 1.01 0.93 0.027 mm hr -1 Passive over land Avg. Columnar IWP Detected:  89  166  183±3  183±7 Units Land V-Pol Lake Effect 0.43 0.16 1.85 0.37 kg m -2 Land V-Pol Synoptic 0.53 0.26 1.10 0.63 kg m -2 Simple IWC conversion (correct assumption????) Lake Effect (3 km clouds) 0.14 0.05 0.62 0.12 g m -3 Synoptic (6 km clouds) 0.09 0.04 0.18 0.11 g m -3 Simple falling snow conversion (melted snow rate) Lake Effect (3 km clouds) 1.97 0.61 11.19 1.65 mm hr -1 Synoptic (6 km clouds) 1.11 0.47 2.64 1.36 mm hr -1 ,[object Object]
RGB Composite AMSU-B Emissivity Map Three Color Emissivity Map by Joe Munchak 89 GHz (red),   150 GHz (green),   183 GHz (blue) Darker colors indicate lower emissivities (more reflective)  Missing data (black).
GCPEx Snowfall Campaign  (Near Toronto, Canada Jan.-Feb. 2012) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],O (60 km) O (10 km) 7-8 km 0.4-0.8 km Ht. King City C-band Dual-pol DFIR Clusters x Georgian Bay CARE D3R PSD:    2DVD, Parsivel, POSS,SVI Radar:    Ka/Ku,X,W(2),MRR SWER:  Pluvio, Hot Plate SWE/Depth   L-Band +   -sensor  (Land/Snow)  10-89 GHz Radiometer Aircraft:  DC-8, Citation x
Today’s Messages ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Questions? Questions? IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society  Administrative Committee (AdCom) Member Voting is open All GRSS members can vote for new AdCom members Please vote this week at the GRSS booth  or online by Sept. 16, 2011

More Related Content

What's hot

Validation_SWOT_ground_airborne_Fjortoft.ppt
Validation_SWOT_ground_airborne_Fjortoft.pptValidation_SWOT_ground_airborne_Fjortoft.ppt
Validation_SWOT_ground_airborne_Fjortoft.ppt
grssieee
 
Kummerow.1.1B.ppt
Kummerow.1.1B.pptKummerow.1.1B.ppt
Kummerow.1.1B.ppt
grssieee
 
Using GPS to Measure Precipitable Water Vapor in Antarctica
Using GPS to Measure Precipitable Water Vapor in AntarcticaUsing GPS to Measure Precipitable Water Vapor in Antarctica
Using GPS to Measure Precipitable Water Vapor in Antarctica
amurray09
 
Kvt mapping of_icing
Kvt mapping of_icingKvt mapping of_icing
Kvt mapping of_icing
Winterwind
 
3_derosnay_IGARSS_2011.pdf
3_derosnay_IGARSS_2011.pdf3_derosnay_IGARSS_2011.pdf
3_derosnay_IGARSS_2011.pdf
grssieee
 
Snow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF
Snow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWFSnow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF
Snow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF
grssieee
 
IGARSS2011-ppt - Ji Dabin.ppt
IGARSS2011-ppt - Ji Dabin.pptIGARSS2011-ppt - Ji Dabin.ppt
IGARSS2011-ppt - Ji Dabin.ppt
grssieee
 
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
Allison Westin, G.I.T.
 
The Use of WSR_88D radar data at NCEP_2015_AMS_20141222
The Use of WSR_88D radar data at NCEP_2015_AMS_20141222The Use of WSR_88D radar data at NCEP_2015_AMS_20141222
The Use of WSR_88D radar data at NCEP_2015_AMS_20141222
shun liu
 
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
grssieee
 
Night Water Vapor Borel Spie 8 12 08 White
Night Water Vapor Borel Spie 8 12 08 WhiteNight Water Vapor Borel Spie 8 12 08 White
Night Water Vapor Borel Spie 8 12 08 White
guest0030172
 

What's hot (16)

Validation_SWOT_ground_airborne_Fjortoft.ppt
Validation_SWOT_ground_airborne_Fjortoft.pptValidation_SWOT_ground_airborne_Fjortoft.ppt
Validation_SWOT_ground_airborne_Fjortoft.ppt
 
Kummerow.1.1B.ppt
Kummerow.1.1B.pptKummerow.1.1B.ppt
Kummerow.1.1B.ppt
 
Using GPS to Measure Precipitable Water Vapor in Antarctica
Using GPS to Measure Precipitable Water Vapor in AntarcticaUsing GPS to Measure Precipitable Water Vapor in Antarctica
Using GPS to Measure Precipitable Water Vapor in Antarctica
 
Kvt mapping of_icing
Kvt mapping of_icingKvt mapping of_icing
Kvt mapping of_icing
 
3_derosnay_IGARSS_2011.pdf
3_derosnay_IGARSS_2011.pdf3_derosnay_IGARSS_2011.pdf
3_derosnay_IGARSS_2011.pdf
 
Snow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF
Snow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWFSnow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF
Snow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF
 
IGARSS2011-ppt - Ji Dabin.ppt
IGARSS2011-ppt - Ji Dabin.pptIGARSS2011-ppt - Ji Dabin.ppt
IGARSS2011-ppt - Ji Dabin.ppt
 
Sabaghy_Workshop
Sabaghy_WorkshopSabaghy_Workshop
Sabaghy_Workshop
 
Brazil2
Brazil2Brazil2
Brazil2
 
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
 
Dozier UCLA 2017-04-10
Dozier UCLA 2017-04-10Dozier UCLA 2017-04-10
Dozier UCLA 2017-04-10
 
The Use of WSR_88D radar data at NCEP_2015_AMS_20141222
The Use of WSR_88D radar data at NCEP_2015_AMS_20141222The Use of WSR_88D radar data at NCEP_2015_AMS_20141222
The Use of WSR_88D radar data at NCEP_2015_AMS_20141222
 
Drinkwater ice sheet symposium - tu delft climate inst., 17 oct 2013(1)
Drinkwater  ice sheet symposium - tu delft climate inst., 17 oct 2013(1)Drinkwater  ice sheet symposium - tu delft climate inst., 17 oct 2013(1)
Drinkwater ice sheet symposium - tu delft climate inst., 17 oct 2013(1)
 
Miren sympo17oct13
Miren sympo17oct13Miren sympo17oct13
Miren sympo17oct13
 
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
 
Night Water Vapor Borel Spie 8 12 08 White
Night Water Vapor Borel Spie 8 12 08 WhiteNight Water Vapor Borel Spie 8 12 08 White
Night Water Vapor Borel Spie 8 12 08 White
 

Viewers also liked

5_Glacier_IGARSS11_Eineder.ppt
5_Glacier_IGARSS11_Eineder.ppt5_Glacier_IGARSS11_Eineder.ppt
5_Glacier_IGARSS11_Eineder.ppt
grssieee
 
2011_0728_IGARSS2011_Motohka.ppt
2011_0728_IGARSS2011_Motohka.ppt2011_0728_IGARSS2011_Motohka.ppt
2011_0728_IGARSS2011_Motohka.ppt
grssieee
 
TU2.L09.1 - COMPACT POLARIMETRY AT THE MOON: THE MINI-RF RADARS
TU2.L09.1	 - COMPACT POLARIMETRY AT THE MOON: THE MINI-RF RADARSTU2.L09.1	 - COMPACT POLARIMETRY AT THE MOON: THE MINI-RF RADARS
TU2.L09.1 - COMPACT POLARIMETRY AT THE MOON: THE MINI-RF RADARS
grssieee
 
FR1.L10.5: SMOS SOIL MOISTURE VALIDATION: STATUS AT THE UPPER DANUBE CAL/VAL ...
FR1.L10.5: SMOS SOIL MOISTURE VALIDATION: STATUS AT THE UPPER DANUBE CAL/VAL ...FR1.L10.5: SMOS SOIL MOISTURE VALIDATION: STATUS AT THE UPPER DANUBE CAL/VAL ...
FR1.L10.5: SMOS SOIL MOISTURE VALIDATION: STATUS AT THE UPPER DANUBE CAL/VAL ...
grssieee
 
EVALUATING TRANSFER LEARNING APPROACHES FOR IMAGE INFORMATION.pptx
EVALUATING TRANSFER LEARNING APPROACHES FOR IMAGE INFORMATION.pptxEVALUATING TRANSFER LEARNING APPROACHES FOR IMAGE INFORMATION.pptx
EVALUATING TRANSFER LEARNING APPROACHES FOR IMAGE INFORMATION.pptx
grssieee
 
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
grssieee
 

Viewers also liked (6)

5_Glacier_IGARSS11_Eineder.ppt
5_Glacier_IGARSS11_Eineder.ppt5_Glacier_IGARSS11_Eineder.ppt
5_Glacier_IGARSS11_Eineder.ppt
 
2011_0728_IGARSS2011_Motohka.ppt
2011_0728_IGARSS2011_Motohka.ppt2011_0728_IGARSS2011_Motohka.ppt
2011_0728_IGARSS2011_Motohka.ppt
 
TU2.L09.1 - COMPACT POLARIMETRY AT THE MOON: THE MINI-RF RADARS
TU2.L09.1	 - COMPACT POLARIMETRY AT THE MOON: THE MINI-RF RADARSTU2.L09.1	 - COMPACT POLARIMETRY AT THE MOON: THE MINI-RF RADARS
TU2.L09.1 - COMPACT POLARIMETRY AT THE MOON: THE MINI-RF RADARS
 
FR1.L10.5: SMOS SOIL MOISTURE VALIDATION: STATUS AT THE UPPER DANUBE CAL/VAL ...
FR1.L10.5: SMOS SOIL MOISTURE VALIDATION: STATUS AT THE UPPER DANUBE CAL/VAL ...FR1.L10.5: SMOS SOIL MOISTURE VALIDATION: STATUS AT THE UPPER DANUBE CAL/VAL ...
FR1.L10.5: SMOS SOIL MOISTURE VALIDATION: STATUS AT THE UPPER DANUBE CAL/VAL ...
 
EVALUATING TRANSFER LEARNING APPROACHES FOR IMAGE INFORMATION.pptx
EVALUATING TRANSFER LEARNING APPROACHES FOR IMAGE INFORMATION.pptxEVALUATING TRANSFER LEARNING APPROACHES FOR IMAGE INFORMATION.pptx
EVALUATING TRANSFER LEARNING APPROACHES FOR IMAGE INFORMATION.pptx
 
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
 

Similar to Thresholds of Detection for Falling Snow from Satellite-Borne Active and Passive Sensors

igarss11swot-vadon-callahan-psc-s3.110725.pptx
igarss11swot-vadon-callahan-psc-s3.110725.pptxigarss11swot-vadon-callahan-psc-s3.110725.pptx
igarss11swot-vadon-callahan-psc-s3.110725.pptx
grssieee
 
ppt pres coastalt 2011.ppt
ppt pres coastalt 2011.pptppt pres coastalt 2011.ppt
ppt pres coastalt 2011.ppt
grssieee
 
presentation_meissner.pptx
presentation_meissner.pptxpresentation_meissner.pptx
presentation_meissner.pptx
grssieee
 
TH3.TO4.2.pptx
TH3.TO4.2.pptxTH3.TO4.2.pptx
TH3.TO4.2.pptx
grssieee
 
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATORSIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
grssieee
 
TU1.T10.2.pptx
TU1.T10.2.pptxTU1.T10.2.pptx
TU1.T10.2.pptx
grssieee
 
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptxIGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
grssieee
 
TU2.L10 - NEXT-GENERATION GLOBAL PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
TU2.L10 - NEXT-GENERATION GLOBAL PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONSTU2.L10 - NEXT-GENERATION GLOBAL PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
TU2.L10 - NEXT-GENERATION GLOBAL PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
grssieee
 
IGARSSAirSWOTv2.ppt
IGARSSAirSWOTv2.pptIGARSSAirSWOTv2.ppt
IGARSSAirSWOTv2.ppt
grssieee
 
On_the_development_of_dualfrq_PR_china(Tiger).ppt
On_the_development_of_dualfrq_PR_china(Tiger).pptOn_the_development_of_dualfrq_PR_china(Tiger).ppt
On_the_development_of_dualfrq_PR_china(Tiger).ppt
grssieee
 
bettenhausen_igarss11_talk.pdf
bettenhausen_igarss11_talk.pdfbettenhausen_igarss11_talk.pdf
bettenhausen_igarss11_talk.pdf
grssieee
 
MONITORING LONG TERM VARIABILITY IN THE ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOUR CONTENT USIN...
MONITORING LONG TERM VARIABILITY IN THE ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOUR CONTENT USIN...MONITORING LONG TERM VARIABILITY IN THE ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOUR CONTENT USIN...
MONITORING LONG TERM VARIABILITY IN THE ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOUR CONTENT USIN...
grssieee
 
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.pptMO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
grssieee
 
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.pptMO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
grssieee
 
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.pptMO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
grssieee
 
TH3.TO4.1.pptx
TH3.TO4.1.pptxTH3.TO4.1.pptx
TH3.TO4.1.pptx
grssieee
 
FR4.L09 - KARIN – THE KA-BAND RADAR INTERFEROMETER ON SWOT: MEASUREMENT PRINC...
FR4.L09 - KARIN – THE KA-BAND RADAR INTERFEROMETER ON SWOT: MEASUREMENT PRINC...FR4.L09 - KARIN – THE KA-BAND RADAR INTERFEROMETER ON SWOT: MEASUREMENT PRINC...
FR4.L09 - KARIN – THE KA-BAND RADAR INTERFEROMETER ON SWOT: MEASUREMENT PRINC...
grssieee
 

Similar to Thresholds of Detection for Falling Snow from Satellite-Borne Active and Passive Sensors (20)

igarss11swot-vadon-callahan-psc-s3.110725.pptx
igarss11swot-vadon-callahan-psc-s3.110725.pptxigarss11swot-vadon-callahan-psc-s3.110725.pptx
igarss11swot-vadon-callahan-psc-s3.110725.pptx
 
ppt pres coastalt 2011.ppt
ppt pres coastalt 2011.pptppt pres coastalt 2011.ppt
ppt pres coastalt 2011.ppt
 
presentation_meissner.pptx
presentation_meissner.pptxpresentation_meissner.pptx
presentation_meissner.pptx
 
TH3.TO4.2.pptx
TH3.TO4.2.pptxTH3.TO4.2.pptx
TH3.TO4.2.pptx
 
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATORSIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
 
TU1.T10.2.pptx
TU1.T10.2.pptxTU1.T10.2.pptx
TU1.T10.2.pptx
 
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptxIGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
 
TU2.L10 - NEXT-GENERATION GLOBAL PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
TU2.L10 - NEXT-GENERATION GLOBAL PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONSTU2.L10 - NEXT-GENERATION GLOBAL PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
TU2.L10 - NEXT-GENERATION GLOBAL PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
 
The Aerial Wetted Path of Geostationary Transmission
The Aerial Wetted Path of Geostationary TransmissionThe Aerial Wetted Path of Geostationary Transmission
The Aerial Wetted Path of Geostationary Transmission
 
The Aerial Wetted Path of Geostationary Transmission
The Aerial Wetted Path of Geostationary TransmissionThe Aerial Wetted Path of Geostationary Transmission
The Aerial Wetted Path of Geostationary Transmission
 
IGARSSAirSWOTv2.ppt
IGARSSAirSWOTv2.pptIGARSSAirSWOTv2.ppt
IGARSSAirSWOTv2.ppt
 
On_the_development_of_dualfrq_PR_china(Tiger).ppt
On_the_development_of_dualfrq_PR_china(Tiger).pptOn_the_development_of_dualfrq_PR_china(Tiger).ppt
On_the_development_of_dualfrq_PR_china(Tiger).ppt
 
bettenhausen_igarss11_talk.pdf
bettenhausen_igarss11_talk.pdfbettenhausen_igarss11_talk.pdf
bettenhausen_igarss11_talk.pdf
 
Pre-Injection Assessment of Time-Lapse Seismic Repeatability at the Aquistore...
Pre-Injection Assessment of Time-Lapse Seismic Repeatability at the Aquistore...Pre-Injection Assessment of Time-Lapse Seismic Repeatability at the Aquistore...
Pre-Injection Assessment of Time-Lapse Seismic Repeatability at the Aquistore...
 
MONITORING LONG TERM VARIABILITY IN THE ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOUR CONTENT USIN...
MONITORING LONG TERM VARIABILITY IN THE ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOUR CONTENT USIN...MONITORING LONG TERM VARIABILITY IN THE ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOUR CONTENT USIN...
MONITORING LONG TERM VARIABILITY IN THE ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOUR CONTENT USIN...
 
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.pptMO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
 
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.pptMO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
 
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.pptMO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
MO3.T10.5Ahmed.ppt
 
TH3.TO4.1.pptx
TH3.TO4.1.pptxTH3.TO4.1.pptx
TH3.TO4.1.pptx
 
FR4.L09 - KARIN – THE KA-BAND RADAR INTERFEROMETER ON SWOT: MEASUREMENT PRINC...
FR4.L09 - KARIN – THE KA-BAND RADAR INTERFEROMETER ON SWOT: MEASUREMENT PRINC...FR4.L09 - KARIN – THE KA-BAND RADAR INTERFEROMETER ON SWOT: MEASUREMENT PRINC...
FR4.L09 - KARIN – THE KA-BAND RADAR INTERFEROMETER ON SWOT: MEASUREMENT PRINC...
 

More from grssieee

SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODELSEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
grssieee
 
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
grssieee
 
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIESTHE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
grssieee
 
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUSGMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
grssieee
 
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETERPROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
grssieee
 
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
grssieee
 
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
grssieee
 
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
grssieee
 
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
grssieee
 
test 34mb wo animations
test  34mb wo animationstest  34mb wo animations
test 34mb wo animations
grssieee
 
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
grssieee
 
DLR open house
DLR open houseDLR open house
DLR open house
grssieee
 
DLR open house
DLR open houseDLR open house
DLR open house
grssieee
 
DLR open house
DLR open houseDLR open house
DLR open house
grssieee
 
Tana_IGARSS2011.ppt
Tana_IGARSS2011.pptTana_IGARSS2011.ppt
Tana_IGARSS2011.ppt
grssieee
 
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.pptSolaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt
grssieee
 
Sakkas.ppt
Sakkas.pptSakkas.ppt
Sakkas.ppt
grssieee
 

More from grssieee (20)

SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODELSEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
 
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
 
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIESTHE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
 
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUSGMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
 
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETERPROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
 
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
 
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
 
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
 
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
 
Test
TestTest
Test
 
test 34mb wo animations
test  34mb wo animationstest  34mb wo animations
test 34mb wo animations
 
Test 70MB
Test 70MBTest 70MB
Test 70MB
 
Test 70MB
Test 70MBTest 70MB
Test 70MB
 
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
 
DLR open house
DLR open houseDLR open house
DLR open house
 
DLR open house
DLR open houseDLR open house
DLR open house
 
DLR open house
DLR open houseDLR open house
DLR open house
 
Tana_IGARSS2011.ppt
Tana_IGARSS2011.pptTana_IGARSS2011.ppt
Tana_IGARSS2011.ppt
 
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.pptSolaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt
 
Sakkas.ppt
Sakkas.pptSakkas.ppt
Sakkas.ppt
 

Thresholds of Detection for Falling Snow from Satellite-Borne Active and Passive Sensors

  • 1. Thresholds of Detection for Falling Snow from Satellite-Borne Active and Passive Sensors IGARSS 2011 Vancouver, Canada Gail Skofronick Jackson Benjamin Johnson Joe Munchak NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland [email_address]
  • 2.
  • 3. Percentages from Surface , Snow , & Water Vapor Lake Effect 2-3km tops (0.5 to 1.0 IWP) Synoptic 5-7km tops (0.5 to 1.0 IWP) Blizzard ~10km tops (0.5 to 1.0 IWP) Blizzard ~10km tops (9 to 10 IWP) “ Surface and Atmospheric Contributions to Microwave Brightness Temperatures for Falling Snow   Events,” by Gail Skofronick-Jackson and Benjamin Johnson, JGR-Atmos, published Jan 2011. (a) (b) (a) (b) Macro and microphysical cloud characteristics affect TB signal These use dendrite snowflakes
  • 4.
  • 5. (1) Surface Emissivity Part 1 Urban crop land deciduous evergreen/mixed water Surface Temperature Vegetation Type Snow Depth WRF Simulations Courtesy of W.-K. Tao & team Lake Effect Case Synoptic Snow Case IWP (Jan 20 0400UTC) IWP (Jan 22 0600UTC)
  • 6. Radar Calculations W-Band (-26dBZ) Ka-Band (12dBZ) Ku-Band (18dBZ) Thresholds of Detection for Falling Snow from Satellite-borne Active and Passive Sensors by G. Skofronick-Jackson, et al., IEEE TGRS, submit 9/11 These use 3-bullet rosette snowflakes
  • 7. Reflectivities Depend on Particle Shape W-Band Ka-Band Ku-Band
  • 8. Reflectivities Depend on Particle Shape W-Band Ka-Band Ku-Band Ka
  • 9. Z-Thresholds Depend on Particle Shape Average IWC Detected at Surface Assumed minimum instrument Z: Ku: 18 dBZ Ka: 12 dBZ W: -15 dBZ ±One std dev of variability over 11 shapes is plotted Snowflake Shape (#) Ku-Band Ka-Band W-Band Long Hex Col. (0) 0.037 0.020 0.0020 Short Hex Col. (1) 0.037 0.020 0.0019 Block Hexag. Col. (2) 0.039 0.020 0.0020 Thick Hex Plate (3) 0.035 0.019 0.0019 Thin Hex Plate (4) 0.033 0.018 0.0022 3-Bullet Rosette (5) 0.062 0.038 0.0018 4-Bullet Rosette (6) 0.065 0.052 0.0026 5-Bullet Rosette (7) 0.062 0.047 0.0022 Six Bullet Rosette (8) 0.063 0.101 0.0023 Sector Snowflake (9) 0.077 0.049 0.0018 Dendrite Snow (10) 0.079 0.145 0.0032
  • 10. Radiometer Threshold Procedure Y-Axis: TBhydr – TBclearair (with perfect surface, etc knowledge) X-Axis: IWP (max of 6 kg/m 2 ) 3-Bullet Rosette Shape: Red Line = Land surfaces, Blue line = Water Surfaces These use 3-bullet rosette snowflakes 10V 183 ± 3V 166V 89V 37V 183 ± 7V
  • 11. Radiometer Thresholds Depend on Shape 89V 166V 166V 166H 183 ± 3V 183 ± 7V 166V 22 Jan
  • 12. Radiometer Thresholds Depend on Snow Vertical Structure and Surface Type Channel (GHz) Total Threshold Cutoff (rounded up) (in K) From 0.05 error in emissivity From 10 o C error in surface T From 10% change in Tprofile From 10% change in RHprof 10 25 14 10 0 0 19 25 14 10 0 0 23 25 14 10 0 0 37 25 13 10 0 0 89 25 13 9 0 0 166 20 11 8 1 1 183±3 5 1 2 1 1 183±7 15 5 6 0 1
  • 13. Radiometer Thresholds Depend on Snow Vertical Structure and Surface Type Channel (GHz) Total Threshold Cutoff Average Detected IWP Lake Effect over Land Detected IWP Lake Effect over Lakes V-pol Detected IWP Lake Effect over Lakes H-pol Detected IWP Synoptic over Land Detected IWP Synoptic over Lakes V-pol Detected IWP Synoptic over Lakes H-pol 10 25 19 25 23 25 3.2 na na 37 25 1.2 2.0 1.1 89 25 0.4 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 166 20 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 183±3 5 1.8 na 1.1 1.1 na 183±7 15 0.4 0.4 na 0.6 0.6 na
  • 14.
  • 15. RGB Composite AMSU-B Emissivity Map Three Color Emissivity Map by Joe Munchak 89 GHz (red), 150 GHz (green), 183 GHz (blue) Darker colors indicate lower emissivities (more reflective) Missing data (black).
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18. Questions? Questions? IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society Administrative Committee (AdCom) Member Voting is open All GRSS members can vote for new AdCom members Please vote this week at the GRSS booth or online by Sept. 16, 2011

Editor's Notes

  1. At 340GHz and higher, spheres were used instead of Liu non-spheres
  2. A 1kg/m^2 threshold of detection for say 89 GHz means that if you distribute that 1kg/m^2 over a 5km cloud thickness (and if I did my math correctly) this means that one would need a surface LIQUID equivalent snow rate of ~3mm/hr (Hence the focus on the blizzard like events in the literature for passive snow events). For 0.5kg/m^2 the liquid equivalent is: 1.25mm/hr
  3. A 1kg/m^2 threshold of detection for say 89 GHz means that if you distribute that 1kg/m^2 over a 5km cloud thickness (and if I did my math correctly) this means that one would need a surface LIQUID equivalent snow rate of ~3mm/hr (Hence the focus on the blizzard like events in the literature for passive snow events). For 0.5kg/m^2 the liquid equivalent is: 1.25mm/hr
  4. dark=low emissivity, in this case from snow cover from blizzards in December 2006), why the oceans are blue (89=red,150=green,183=blue + emissivity increases with frequency = blue oceans), and why there is missing data (cloud cover or too much water vapor for all channels to "see" surface).