More Related Content
Similar to Classics 2011 (20)
Classics 2011
- 8. Align with the dialogue partner (e.g., Brennan & Clark, 1996)
- 9. Use a prespecified preference order as modeled in the Incremental Algorithm (Dale & Reiter, 1995), e.g., 1) color, 2) size, 3) orientation
- 12. For example The chair seen from the front instead of The green chair
- 48. Indicate wether it is the same as the previous word (”Bal-Bal” or “Dal-”Dal”) or different (“Bal-Dal” or “Dal-Bal”)
- 57. Conceptual pacts in dialogue Assess the relative importance of each procedure Decide between these two accounts of alignment
- 62. Was the word the same as the previous one? (y = yes, n = no)
- 65. Was the word the same as the previous one? (y = yes, n = no)
- 68. Was the word the same as the previous one? (y = yes, n = no)
- 71. Was the word the same as the previous one? (y = yes, n = no)
- 77. When faced with a (verbal) secondary task, speakers align less with overspecified primes
- 80. In the model of Gatt et al., the preference list should get priority when modeling REG under pressure
- 81. This experiment suggest that alignment (at the conceptual level) is an effortful process, primarily benefiting the listener