Singapore has transformed into a highly successful and livable global city through 4 phases of economic development, focusing on attracting multinational corporations and transitioning to higher value industries. It maintains competitiveness through world-class infrastructure and focus on education as soft connectivity. Strong institutions and leadership provide good governance and policies to support business. As a global city-state, Singapore faces challenges of rising inequality and middle-class aspirations conflicting with needs as a hub. Continued focus on competitiveness through economic freedom rather than redistribution will help it adapt to changing dynamics.

1. PELUANG &
TANTANGAN
COMPETITIVE
CITY
UNTUK
PERWUJUDAN
LIVABLE CITY
Febri Fitrianingrum |3614100008
Gea Feroza |3614100021
Rivan Aji Wahyu D.S |3614100042
Sherly Jasmine |3614100069

2. OUT
LIN
E
Latar Belakang
Peluang
Tantangan
Competitive City
Liveable City
Studi Kasus
Kesimpulan

4. LATARBELAKANG
Pemberian
Otonomi
Daerah
Disparitas
pembangunan
antar wilayah
Globalisasi

5. Peluang
• Definisi: (KBBI) Kesempatan yang pada dasarnya berupa hal baik
Good
governance
Arus
investasi
mengalir
deras
Perekonomian
di Perkotaan
Meningkat
Timbul
Competitive
City
Mampu
bersaing
dengan
kota lain
Produktivitas
Masyarakat
meningkat
Kota
menjadi
sejahtera

6. Kemajuan
Teknologi
Inovasi
Masyarakat
Membantu
Pemasaran
hasil Produksi
Muncul
Competitive
Advantages
Masyarakat
Produktif
Meningkatkan
Perekonomian
Kota

7. • Daya Saing UKM Meningkat
• Infrastuktur Kota Bertambah
• SDM Banyak
• competitive Advantages
• Investasi masuk
MEA > Persaingan Ketat

8. Tantangan
• Definisi : (KBBI)Hal atau objek yang menggugah tekad untuk
meningkatkan kemampuan mengatasi masalah
Urbanisasi Bonus Demografi
Kepadatan Penduduk
Kebutuhan Tempat Tinggal
Meningkat
Infrastuktur Kota tidak mampu
melayani lagi
Kemiskinan Lapangan Pekerjaan Berkurang Degradasi Lingkungan

9. Kesenjangan Sosial Kecemburuan Sosial
Pencurian
Kriminalitas
Pembegalan Pembunuhan

10. Upaya dalam
menghadapi tantangan
di dunia
Tingkat Pendidikan Masyarakat Kota
Kota di Indonesia Masih rendah
Sehingga menyebabkan tantangan lebih
untuk berkompetensi terhadap asing
Melakukan penyuluhan untuk masyarakat
kota guna meningkatkan daya saing

11. MEA Daya saing
Meningkat
Infrastruktur
Kota harus
dikembangkan
Tenaga
Kerja Asing
HAK
PATEN
Menurut UU hak paten No. 14 Tahun 2001
hak eksklusif yang diberikan oleh negara kepada inventor atas hasil invensinya di bidang teknologi, yang untuk selama waktu tertentu
melaksanakan sendiri invensinya tersebut kepada pihak lain untuk melaksanakannya.
Invensi: Invensi adalah ide inventor yang dituangkan ke dalam suatu kegiatan pemecahan masalah yang spesifik di bidang teknologi, dapat
berupa produk atau proses, atau penyempurnaan dan pengembangan produk atau proses.

12. COMPETI
TIVE
CITY

13. Berawal dari sebuah
tantangan
Daya saing secara global yang
menyebabkan kota-kota pada seluruh
negara berupaya meningkatkan daya saing
kotanya. Daya saing (competitiveness)
menentukan apakah suatu daerah
potensial bagi investasi atau tidak.

14. Pengertian..
Competitive city adalah daya saing antar kota untuk meningkatkan
kualitas ekonomi secara global dengan melibatkan faktor toleransi,
tenaga ahli, dan teknologi.
Toleransi  keterbukaan, inklusif, dan keberagaman terhadap
semua jenis etnis, ras, dan carahidup.
Tenaga ahli  tingkat keahlian danketerampilan tenaga kerja
yang cukup tinggi.
Teknologi  inovasi dan pengembangan teknologi pada suatu
wilayah.

15. Gimana sih konsep competitive city?
Berdasar 5 pilar sustainable and competitive future and city concept:
1. smart economy
2. smart people
3. smart governance
4. smart environment
5. smart living

16. Tujuan Competitive City
Menciptakan kota yang memiliki daya saing global dan berorientasi
pada perwujudan kota hijau yang layak huni.

17. Tantangan perwujudan competitive city
1. menghadapi ASEAN
2. Kesiapan kota-kota Indonesia

18. Kota kompetitif di dunia
1. New York Total skor: 75,7
2. London Total skor: 73,1
3. Singapura Total skor: 71,2
4. Hongkong Total skor: 68,1
5. Tokyo Total skor: 68
6. Sydney Total skor: 67,3
7. Paris Total skor: 67
8. Stockholm Total skor: 65,7
9. Chicago Total skor: 65,6
10. Toronto Total skor: 64,7
11. Zurich Total skor: 64,1
12. Taipei Total skor: 64,1
13. Amsterdam Total skor: 63,8
14. Washington, DC Total skor: 63
15. Seoul Total skor: 63
16. Kopenhagen Total skor: 63
17. Los Angeles Total skor: 62,7

19. Contoh competitive city di Asia
Singapura
• pendapatan GNP tertinggi di dunia (pendapatan total
ekonomi suatu negara selama satu tahun, termasuk
nilai produksi yang dihasilkan oleh penduduk dari
negara tersebut) di dalam dan di luar wilayah negara.
• GDP (nilai jasa atau barang yang dihasilkan ole per
unit produk di wilayah suatu negara dalam jangka
satu tahun) sebesar USD 52.052

20. Competitive city di Indonesia
1. Bandung
2. Jakarta
3. Surabaya
4. Medan
5. Samarinda

24. KOTA
LAYAK
HUNI

26. Pengertian Livable City
Menurut beberapa ahli

27. Jadi Livable City…
Adalah sebuah lingkungan dan suasana kota yang nyaman
sebagai tempat tinggal dan sebagai tempat untuk beraktifitas
yang dilihat dari berbagai aspek, baik aspek fisik (fasilitas
perkotaan, prasarana, tata ruang, dll) maupun aspek non-
fisik (hubungan sosial, aktivitas ekonomi, dll).

28. KONSEP LIVABLE CITY
Konsep livable city
digunakan dalam
representasi sustainable
city (Wheeler, 2004)
yang erat kaitannya
dengan sustainable
development. Sehingga
penerapan konsep
livable city dalam
perencanaan kota harus
diaplikasikan kedalam
ketiga aspek tersebut.

29. Prinsip Livable City
Menurut Lennard (1997)
Tersedianya berbagai kebutuhan dasar masyarakat perkotaan (hunian yang layak,
air bersih, listrik).
Tersedianya berbagai fasilitas umum dan fasilitas sosial (transportasi publik,
taman kota, fasilitas ibadah/kesehatan/ibadah).
Tersedianya ruang dan tempat publik untuk bersosialisasi dan berinteraksi.
Keamanan, Bebas dari rasa takut.
Mendukung fungsi ekonomi, sosial dan budaya.
Sanitasi lingkungan dan keindahan lingkungan fisik.

30. Prinsip Livable City
Menurut Douglass (2002)
• Meningkatkan sistem kesempatan hidup untuk kesejahteraan
masyarakat.
• Penyediaan lapangan pekerjaan.
• Lingkungan yang aman dan bersih untuk
kesehatan, kesejahteraandan untuk mempertahankan pertumbuhan
ekonomi.
• Good governance.

31. Kriteria Kota Layak Huni
Menurut Economist Intelligence Global Livability Survey

32. Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan Indonesia (IAP) melakukan penelitian
Indonesia Most Livable City Index (MLCI) pada tahun 2009 dan 2011
26 indikator yang dikelompokkan
ke dalam 9 kriteria utama
1.Aspek Tata Ruang (Tata Kota, RTH),
2.Aspek Lingkungan (Kebersihan, Polusi),
3.Aspek Transportasi (Jalan, Angkutan),
4.Aspek Fasilitas Kesehatan,
5.Aspek Fasilitas Pendidikan,
6.Aspek Infrastruktur – Utilitas (Listrik, Air,
Telekomunikasi),
7.Aspek Ekonomi (LapanganKerja, LokasiKerja),
8.Aspek Keamanan,
9.Aspek Sosial (Kebudayaan, InteraksiWarga).
15
kota besar
di Indonesia

33. Kota 2009 2011
Yogyakarta 65,34 66.52%
Denpasar - 63.63%
Makasar 56,52 58.46%
Manado 59,90 56.39%
Surabaya 53,13 56.38%
Semarang 52,52 54.63%
Banjarmasin 52,61 53.16%
Batam - 52.60%
Jayapura 53,86 52.56%
Bandung 56,37 52.32%
Palembang - 52.15%
Palangkaraya 52,04 50.86%
Jakarta 51,90 50.71%
Pontianak 43,65 46.92%
Medan 52,28 46.67%
Tabel Most Livable City Index 2009 & 2011 di Indonesia
2009 2011
54,17% 54,26%
“Ini memperlihatkan bahwa kota-kota
tersebut masih berada dalam kondisi
yang jauh dari ideal, (IAP, 2011)”

36. STABILITY
HEALTHCARE
CULTURE AND
ENVIRONMENT
EDUCATION
INFRASTRUCTURE

37. Livable City in Southeast Asia
5. Manila, Filipina
4. Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
3. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2. Hongkong
1. Singapura

38. CASE STUDY FROM
SOUTH EAST ASIA
“SINGAPORE” AS A HIGH-INCOME; A CITY STATE AND GLOBAL CITY

39. SINGAPORE,
MEGATRENDS
Rising inequality
Singapore has seen big
increases in inequality within
their municipal limits
Technological Change
Singapore has done this
impressively by becoming world-
class locations for an array of
service sectors.
Industrial Cluster and Global
Value Chains
Singapore has done compete
vigorously to host regional High
Quality operations and subsidiaries in
Asia
Urbanization,
demographics and
emerging middle class
Singapore has relied heavily on
large-scale immigration, which
has exacerbated income
inequality
Sustainability
Governance

40. EXTENDED BACKGROUND - SINGAPORE’S MODERN ECONOMIC
TRANSFORMATION HAS GONE THROUGH FOUR PHASES.
Attracting MNEs
for labour
intensive
export-oriented
light
manufacturing
(textiles,
garments,
plastics, radio
and TV sets, and
other low-end
electronics)
Phase 1 (1960s
and 1970s)
Capital-intensive
production as real
wages increased
eroding labour-
cost advantage
(electronics, e.g.
Dynamic Random
Access Memory
[DRAM];
petroleum refining;
and ship repair,
which started in
the late 1960s)
Phase 2 (late
1970s and 1980s)
Higher-value and
knowledge-intensive
goods and services
(electronics,
pharmaceuticals and
life sciences; financial
and other services)
Phase 3 (late 1980s
and 1990s)
high-end services (niche
financial services such as
wealth management and
offshore finance, other
business services, casinos
and integrated resorts,
commodities trading,
education, healthcare,
transport and logistics)
high-end manufacturing
(electronics, life sciences,
petrochemicals, marine
and aviation
engineering)
Services hubs for Asia
Phase 4 (late 1990s to
the present) – The
Global City

41. SINGAPORE,
EXPLAINING ITS
COMPETITIVENESS
Hard connectivity (core physical
infrastructure)
a. Urban density is preferable to urban sprawl –
Singapore builds “building tall” in city centres,
which is good for business, innovation, the arts
and culture, and the environment.
b. Intelligent choices in infrastructure – Example
includes Singapore’s electronic road pricing and
water treatment systems
Soft connectivity
a. Education is the ultimate soft connectivity
–, Singapore has become the continent’s
education hub.
b. Making cities more liveable must be a
higher priority – This means improving the
quality of urban life, especially for upper-
middle- and high-income cities. Singapore, as
global cities, appreciate that they have to
expand and diversify their educational,
cultural and recreational facilities to attract
top global talent.
Policies and regulation of the
business environment (what to
reform)
a. Getting basics right - Singapore is to keep
policy simple for producers, consumers and
citizens.
b. Developing own foreign economic policies –
Cities should create their own policies on trade,
foreign direct investment, tourism and
attracting foreign talent, and advance these
globally as far as possible
Institutions (how to reform) –
governance or decision making
framework
a. Leadership and vision – A clear, far-
sighted view of where cities should head,
and a single-minded, practical will to
ensure they get there are key – showing
the power of mayors as “chief executive
officers”
b. Institutional strength – Singapore
highlights the importance of gradually
building up strength of institutions
through successive development phases.
c. Windows of opportunity – Cities should
look out for opportunities, often during a
political or economic crisis, to push
through the required number of decisive
reforms

42. SINGAPORE,
Challenges and
Prospect
Singapore, faces the dilemmas of a highly successful global city that is also a city state. It has to keep adapting faster and more
nimbly than “normal” cities or countries if it is to stay on top. High or moderately high growth is much more difficult at
its present advanced stage of development. Future growth will depend overwhelmingly on innovation and productivity gains rather than
mobilizing huge inputs of land, labour and capital. Twenty-first-century globalization also brings wider inequality, especially for
a small, highly open economy, and even more so for a global city.
Challenges and Prospect

43. CHALLENGES AND PROSPECT
 At the same time, Singaporeans are now overwhelmingly in the middle class and have rising expectations. They have increasingly
“normal-country” aspirations and sometimes chafe at the constant pressure to adapt to the demands of a global city. Some feel
that Singapore, as a global city, dilutes or even endangers local heritage and identity. They are more sensitive to the
widening gaps in society, which is related to issues such as immigration, housing and the high cost of living.
 For most of the Lee Kuan Yew era, the Singapore government faced “hard” problems – providing, for example, jobs, houses,
education and housing – for which it supplied hard solutions, at a time when the ruling party monopolized political space. But a
wealthier society has also become more demanding, with increasing numbers giving voice to discontent on a variety of hard
and soft issues, and at a time when politics is becoming more plural and competitive.
 As the political system opens up, critics call for the government to be more activist and redistributive, and to tighten up
on immigration. However, Singapore’s overwhelming advantage is as a global city, not as a “normal”, parochial country. That calls
for sound institutions and excellent hard and soft connectivity – and, above all, continuing to get the basics right. Veering in a
European social-democratic direction is a recipe for sclerosis and becoming second class; it would undermine Singapore’s
competitiveness. Rather, the logic of the global city calls for more competition and genuine economic freedom. That is a far
better way to improve sluggish productivity than government micro-interventions in the economy. It is an argument for
government to focus more on its “rule-setting” and “umpiring” role, and less on being a direct player or micromanager in the
economy.

44. SINGAPORE,
LESSON LEARNED
FOR US
It has lessons for cities in the developing world
that start poor or at a middle-income level, but
that aspire to be rich.
Leadership, vision, taking
advantage of crises, building
sound institutions, getting
the basics right on policy,
building hard as well as soft
connectivity – these are all valuable
takeaways.
“

45.  Gita: Kompetititve=liveable: sejauh mana cakupan bisa dikatakan competitive maupun liveable city.
Dengan karakteristik kota yang dimiliki, SK: Delfi perekonomian meningkat, tapi termasuk kota miskin,
jadii…. Apapkah selalu sejalan?
 Lidia: Menurut kalian, hal tersebut dapat dikatakan tantangan dan dapat dikatakan peluang….
Batasannya seperti apa