American Government P5IP instructions The instructor has returned your Week 4 Individual Project Key Assignment with comments and suggestions on how to improve your overall draft. [Instructors’ Comments: Overview of selected Constitutional Amendment (38/38). Demonstrates a clear understanding of the need being addressed. The types of crimes to be addressed by the proposed policy (10/15): Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. Specific constitutional rights to be upheld (12/22): Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. The rationale for the proposed policy (12/23): Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. How should the proposed policy be evaluated (11/30). Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. Mechanics (15/15). Document organization (7/7). Demonstrates a clear understanding of the document organization. You did a very good job in discussing your chosen amendments and the purpose of each amendment. In addition, you accurately discussed who each amendment affects and why each amendment is important, and how each amendment. You did not complete the second part of the assignment, in which you were to discuss what type of policy you believe would need to be implemented for police investigators when interrogating a suspect. However, you did not provide any discussion regarding this matter. You were to determine what your ideal policy would be. For example, if you believed that the current Miranda policy was sufficient to address issues with police interrogations you would then discuss the type of crimes the policy should pertain (i.e., felony, misdemeanors, or both), the specific constitutional rights that must be upheld under the policy, the rationale for the policy, and discuss how the policy should be evaluated for potential weaknesses or gaps. You are on the right track, just make sure you are responding to every question in a task and if you have any questions seek clarification.] Assignment Guidelines 1. Revise and amend your Week 4 Key Assignment by adding/changing what your instructor commented on. 2. Address the following, and add your responses to your Key Assignment final draft: 3. Conduct an Internet search for a current foreign policy that deals with the same issue you discussed in your Week 4 Individual Project. 4. What is the name of the country? a. What is the name of the policy in the other country? b. What are the specific components of the policy? Explain in detail. c. How might you evaluate the policy’s overall effectiveness? Explain. *Must be in APA format with references. Running head: P4IP 2 P4IP PBAD200-1204B-01 P4IP Colorado Technical University Instructor: Professors Jeter Connie Hutson 17 December 2012  Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights The Fourth Amendment is entrenched in English legal doctrine. Sir Edward Coke, in Semayne's.

1. American Government P5IP instructions
The instructor has returned your Week 4 Individual Project Key
Assignment with comments and suggestions on how to improve
your overall draft.
[Instructors’ Comments: Overview of selected Constitutional
Amendment (38/38). Demonstrates a clear understanding of the
need being addressed. The types of crimes to be addressed by
the proposed policy (10/15): Minimal effort; does not
demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information.
Specific constitutional rights to be upheld (12/22): Minimal
effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant
information. The rationale for the proposed policy (12/23):
Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing
relevant information. How should the proposed policy be
evaluated (11/30). Minimal effort; does not demonstrate
comprehension; missing relevant information. Mechanics
(15/15). Document organization (7/7). Demonstrates a clear
understanding of the document organization. You did a very
good job in discussing your chosen amendments and the purpose
of each amendment. In addition, you accurately discussed who
each amendment affects and why each amendment is important,
and how each amendment. You did not complete the second part
of the assignment, in which you were to discuss what type of
policy you believe would need to be implemented for police
investigators when interrogating a suspect. However, you did
not provide any discussion regarding this matter. You were to
determine what your ideal policy would be. For example, if you
believed that the current Miranda policy was sufficient to
address issues with police interrogations you would then discuss
the type of crimes the policy should pertain (i.e., felony,
misdemeanors, or both), the specific constitutional rights that
must be upheld under the policy, the rationale for the policy,
and discuss how the policy should be evaluated for potential
weaknesses or gaps. You are on the right track, just make sure

2. you are responding to every question in a task and if you have
any questions seek clarification.]
Assignment Guidelines
1. Revise and amend your Week 4 Key Assignment by
adding/changing what your instructor commented on.
2. Address the following, and add your responses to your Key
Assignment final draft:
3. Conduct an Internet search for a current foreign policy that
deals with the same issue you discussed in your Week 4
Individual Project.
4. What is the name of the country?
a. What is the name of the policy in the other country?
b. What are the specific components of the policy? Explain in
detail.
c. How might you evaluate the policy’s overall effectiveness?
Explain.
*Must be in APA format with references.
Running head: P4IP
2
P4IP
PBAD200-1204B-01 P4IP
Colorado Technical University
Instructor: Professors Jeter
Connie Hutson

3. 17 December 2012
Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights
The Fourth Amendment is entrenched in English legal
doctrine. Sir Edward Coke, in Semayne's case (1604), famously
stated: "The house of every one is to him as his castle and
fortress, as well for his defense against injury and violence as
for his repose." Semayne's Case acknowledged that the King did
not have unbridled authority to intrude on his subjects'
dwellings but recognized that government agents were permitted
to conduct searches and seizures under certain conditions when
their purpose was lawful and a warrant had been obtained
(Senzell, S. 2008).
The Constitution defines the bill as this; “The right of the
people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the
place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
This bill protects citizens against the violation of their rights to
privacy of property where it restricts the arbitrary searching and
seizing as well as arrest of property or a suspect without the
express consent which is in the form of a warrant that is
judicially acquired and also with enough probable cause to do
so (Akhil 1998).
The amendment came to being as a result of the misuse of
the writ of assistance which was a general search warrant that
was used in the American Revolution. The extent to which an
officer of the law can search and seize the property or arrest a
suspect is limited to the information supplied to the issuing
court by the law enforcement officer who has sworn by the
authenticity of said information.
One way the courts enforce the Fourth Amendment is by
use of the exclusionary rule. The rule provides that evidence
obtained through a violation of the IV Amendment is not
admissible by the prosecution during the defendant's criminal
trial. The Court adopted the exclusionary rule in Weeks v.

4. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), prior to which all evidence,
no matter how seized, could be admitted in court.
The Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Amendment five of the Bill of rights states that “No person
shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,
except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the
Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;
nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice
put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any
criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall
private property be taken for public use, without just
compensation” (Kootz R 2012)
The Fifth Amendment had exemptions this was stated as in
cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when
in actual service in time of War or public danger.
Grand jury: The Fifth Amendment demands that an accused be
presented in front of a grand jury who shall decide if the
defendant has a case to answer.
Double jeopardy: The double jeopardy clause dictates that no
person after being acquitted of charges shall be re-accused of
the same charges, jeopardy is activated when the jury is
empaneled, the first witness is sworn, or a plea is accepted,
after acquittal the government prosecutor is not allowed to retry
the case Find Law (2012).
Self-Incrimination: The fifth protects accused from making
utterances that may lead to self accusation because the response
could provide self-incriminating evidence of an illegal act
punishable by fines, penalties or forfeiture. The Supreme Court
has held that "a witness may have a reasonable fear of
prosecution and yet be innocent of any wrongdoing. The
privilege serves to protect the innocent who otherwise might be
ensnared by ambiguous circumstances Ohio vs. Reiner 532
us.17 (2001).

5. Eminent Domain: The supreme court says that every state has
imminent authority over all land that lies within its borders as
long as its used for the public good the powers of eminent
domain are checked by a clause that states that just recompense
has to be given to persons whom land is taken from for public
use. In Kelo v. City of New London, the U.S. Supreme Court
rendered a controversial opinion in which they held that “a city
could constitutionally seize private property for private
commercial development.” (2005).
Sixth Amendment of the Bill Of Rights
The sixth amendment contains the rights that govern
criminal prosecution it states that “In all criminal
prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and
public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district
wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district
shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be
informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be
confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory
process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the
Assistance of Counsel for his defense. Kootz (2012)
Speedy trial: The need for speedy trial was informed by the
reasoning that the accused needed to know his fate early enough
and be saved the anguish of waiting also that so as not to
disrupt their daily routine and also it sought to ease the burden
of anxiety and scrutiny accompanying public criminal
proceedings, and to reduce the chances that a prolonged delay
before trial will impair the ability of the accused to prepare a
defense. It was argued that the longer the commencement of a
trial is postponed, courts have observed, the more likely it is
that witnesses will disappear, that evidence will be lost or
destroyed, and that memories will fade (Linda, R. 2012).
The Founding Fathers believed that public criminal
proceedings would operate as a check against malevolent
prosecutions, corrupt or malleable judges, and perjurious
witnesses. The public nature of criminal proceedings also aids

6. the fact-finding mission of the judiciary by encouraging citizens
to come forward with relevant information, whether inculpatory
or exculpatory.
Impartial jury: The right to a jury depends on the type of crime
committed if it’s a petty crime that doesn’t attract imprisonment
exceeding six months the jury is not commissioned
Right to counsel: Every accused person is given a right to
procure the services of a barrister, if they cannot be able to
afford one is provide to them by the court on a probonal basis.
Reference
References
Akhil, R., 1998 1st edition, The Bill of Rights: Creation and
Reconstruction, Yale University,
retrieved from Legal Information Institute, Bill of rights,
on December 11, 2012 from
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/billofrights
Kootz, R., 2012. Understanding Your Civil Rights, e-book
edition Rosen group Fifth amendment
right against self-Incrimination, Find Law, retrieved on
December 11, 2012 from
http://criminal.com
Senzell, S., 2008 Edition, Understanding the Bill of Rights;
illustrated Crab Tree Publishing
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fifth_amendment
Linda R., The Bill of Rights: a user's guide, retrieved on
December 11, 2012 from
www.lindamonk.com