SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 57
INTERNATIONAL MARKETING
  STRATEGIES OF FOREIGN
      COMPANIES IN:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA




    ANKUR PANDEY (IM-2K8-007)
    ABHIRAJ PATEL (IM-2K8-001)
ECONOMY
   Rank: 1st (nominal) / 1st (PPP)
   Currency: US$ (USD)
   Fiscal year: October 1 – September 30
   GDP: $15.776 trillion (September 2012)
   GDP growth: 2.3% (September 2011–September
    2012)
   GDP per Capita: $48,450
    (2011; 14th, nominal; 6th, PPP)
   GDP by Sector: Agriculture- 1.2%;
                 Industry- 19.2%,
                 Services- 79.6% (2011 est.)
   Nature of Economy: Mixed
Credit rating

    Standard & Poor's:
    AA+ (Domestic)
    AA+ (Foreign)
    AAA (T&C Assessment)
    Outlook: Negative


    Moody's:
    AAA
    Outlook: Negative


    Fitch:
    AAA
    Outlook: Negative
Economic History
   The economic history of the United States has its
    roots in European settlements in the
    16th, 17th, and 18th centuries.
   The American colonies went from marginally
    successful colonial economies to a
    small, independent farming economy, which in
    1776 became the United States of America.
   In 180 years the United States grew to a
    huge, integrated, industrialized economy that still
    makes up over a quarter of the world economy.
   The United States has been the world's largest
    national economy since at least the 1920s
BUSINESS ENVIORNMENT
   10th in ‘FORBES- Top 10 Countries For
    Business-2012’
   10th in ‘2012 index of Economic Freedom’
   23rd in ‘The Enabling Trade Index-2012’
   18th in ‘Economic freedom of the world 2012’
   4th in ‘Ease of doing Business’ and 13th in
    ‘Starting a Business’ according to World Bank
    Reports-2012.
Trade Facts
   Venture capital, as an industry, originated in
    the United States and it is still dominated by
    the U.S
   Out of World's 500 largest companies, 133 are
    Of the headquartered in the United States !
   There are more than 250 general and special
    purpose zones in the United States, including
    The North American Free Trade
    Agreement, or NAFTA.
HARVARD BUSINESS
REVIEW
   According to a report of the Harvard Business
    Review in March 2012, by Michael E. Porter
    and Jan W. Rivkin
   This research finds two sets of avoidable
    causes that can improve the business
    environment in the US.
The First Cause
   First are poor policies.
   The U.S. government is failing to tackle
    weaknesses in the business environment that
    are making the country a less attractive place
    to invest and are nullifying some of America‘s
    most important competitive strengths.
   The government has also failed to eliminate
    distortions in the international trading and
    investment system that disadvantage the
    United States.
The Second Cause
   Second, in the rush to globalize, companies have
    overlooked current and latent advantages of a
    U.S. location.
   Many factors affect the profitability of operating in
    a certain locale: wage levels, skills
    availability, utility rates, taxes, subsidies, shipping
    costs and reliability, local productivity, supervision
    costs, and many more.
   These factors are complex, interrelated, and
    dynamic.
   Locating an activity in one country often has ripple
    effects on activities elsewhere.
The Second Cause
   Because many companies are still learning
    how to weigh these factors—
    indeed, processes for making location
    decisions have lagged behind those for
    virtually all other major investment decisions—
    companies can fall prey to biases that work
    against the U.S.
Suggestions…
   According to the Report,
   If the U.S. can tackle some of its weaknesses as a
    business location, there are grounds for optimism.
   Important trends are beginning to favor a U.S.
    location, such as rapidly rising wages in emerging
    economies, increasing transportation and
    logistical costs, and shortening product life
    cycles, which makes ―near-shoring‖ attractive.
   Companies are also starting to understand the
    hidden costs of off-shoring and to see and act on
    their ability to improve business environments in
    their U.S. communities.
Foreign Companies in US
          Japanese

      South Korean

              Indian
       (Covered in this Presentation)
Japan
Challenges for Japanese
Companies
   Americans have been quite Conservative and
    repulsive for Japanese competitors. It can be
    explained in the following Cases.
   Two highly publicized rulings in particular by
    U.S. juries awarding very substantial damages
    for patent infringement against Japanese
    companies confirmed fears in Japan that the
    American jury system is often biased against
    large Japanese companies.
Minolta-Honeywell
   Minolta had infringed Honeywell patents
    covering autofocus camera lens technology
    and had been ordered to pay $96 million in
    damages by the Jury.
   Later, Minolta ultimately settled the case for
    $127.5 million.
Nintendo
   Likewise, Jury ordered Nintendo to pay $208
    million to a bankrupt U.S. company for
    infringement of its patent covering video
    games.
   Another Japanese video game manufacturer
    had previously settled with the U.S. patent
    owner prior to the ruling.
Smith-Corona vs. Brother:
from defense to offense
   The most well known affirmative use of the
    U.S. antidumping laws by a Japanese
    company arose out of the filing of an
    antidumping petition in 1979 by Smith Corona
    Corporation against imports of portable electric
    typewriters ("PETs") from Japan.
   A number of Japanese producers of
    PETs, including Brother Industries, were
    named as respondents in the antidumping
    investigation initiated as a result of Smith
    Corona's petition.
How did they Respond ?
   When confronted with unreasonable demands from
    their competitors, Japanese companies no longer did
    capitulate, but readily challenged these demands by
    going to court.
   They might not have always been successful in these
    endeavors, but their perseverance has earned them
    the grudging respect of their American and foreign
    competition.
   Their strategy has even begun to be emulated by
    some of their foreign competitors.
   Japanese businessmen have, indeed, enacted this
    aspect of their strategy for doing business in the
    United States "broadly, correctly and openly"
TOYOTA
Toyota
   Ranked 1st among top vehicle manufacturing groups
    (Volume), end of year production-2010 by the International
    Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA).
   Toyota's (TM) share of the U.S. light vehicle market is 18%
    and Honda's (HMC) is 10%. GM's (GM) share of its home
    market is about 22%.
   Fifty-five years ago, the No.1 U.S. car company had 54%
    of the U.S. market. By this time next year, GM's piece of
    the American car pie could drop another 50%, bringing it
    closer to Honda's.
   There is vast opportunity as it is said that GM and
    Chrysler, after years of poor management or bad luck will
    lose a tremendous amount of business if they continue
    operating in bankruptcy.
Toyota
   Toyota has played well in a long waiting game in
    and made better cars than U.S. companies.
   It Kept labor costs low and built a reputation for
    durable and dependable products.
   being hurt by the global car sales downturn, it
    never had the labor cost or corporate debt
    problems that plagued GM.
   It has the balance sheet to make it through the
    crisis.
   ‗Maybe Toyota has been lucky for decades or
    maybe Toyota was just smart‘
Toyota Vs. General Motors
Toyota Vs. GM, according to Peter Morici, professor at the Smith School of
Business,
University of Maryland School, and former Chief Economist at the U.S.
International Trade Commission.
Toyota Vs. GM
   Toyota enjoys much lower labor costs in the United
    States.
    Benefits from an undervalued yen for cars made in
    Japan. In the United States, this comes to about
    $2500 per vehicle.
   The entry level and middle level market segments are
    very sensitive to price and vehicle durability.
   Toyota has been able to translate its cost advantage
    into vehicles with higher, more attractive content and
    longer life than General Motors.
   It's Camry and Corolla, and derivatives of those
    cars, have been able to dominate their market spaces
    and have even set the standard others must follow
    and they establish the price thresholds.
Strategies
   Toyota is constantly looking for ways to lower
    costs and improve products.
   It translates most of the additional profits it
    earns, over GM, into better product design and
    additional capacity.
   At GM, the Executives vote themselves
    bonuses and the union demands more
    benefits and featherbedding at the first sign of
    profits
Toyota Diverging & GM Converging
!
   While G.M. is closing its factories in its native
    country, Toyota is opening its new plants in
    North America. This is because:
   It offers customers cars that are less
    expensive and less trouble to own, over the
    life of the cars.
   Toyota's don't break as much and perform
    well.
   GM vehicles require more repairs and don't
    age well.
"Wake up America and Buy
American"
   The native slogan "Wake up America and Buy
    American" of GM may not affect the future of
    Toyota in the US market.
   Thanks to big bonuses to executives, outsized
    fringe benefits for the UAW, poor product
    quality and just plain arrogance GM and the
    UAW have lost the loyalty of American car
    buyers.
   Americans are not protectionist in their buying
    habits, and GM executives and the UAW have
    lost the trust and loyalty of many younger car
    buyers.
Toyota Tundra
   The full-size pick-up truck segment is considered
    to be the most profitable and the fastest-growing
    segment in a slow-growing US automobile
    industry.
   Highly competitive with players like Ford and
    General Motors dominating the industry.
   The World‘s largest Company-
    2011, Toyota, aimed to increase its share in the
    light truck segment through the launch of a new
    pick-up truck model in early 2007, called Tundra.
Toyota Tundra
Toyota Tundra
   In the market for pick-up trucks, the buyers were
    known to be tremendously loyal to trucks made by
    American companies.
   in its efforts to market Tundra, Toyota promoted
    the pick-up truck at events considered to be
    traditionally American such as NASCAR
    racing, fishing tournaments, country-western
    concerts, etc.
   The company also made an investment of $850
    million to establish a new plant at San
    Antonio, Texas, for manufacturing only Tundra
    vehicles and set a sales target of 200,000 units in
    2007.
Toyota Prius
   Due to constant Innovations in Technology and
    Increasing fuel prices, Toyota has Innovated
    the first Hybrid vehicle in 2008, Toyota
    Prius, having dual power consumption
    operating on Petrol and Electric engine.
   The company has placed it in the Segment
    between Corolla and Camery and Marketed it
    as of a Higher Segments.
Toyota Prius
Threats for Toyota Motors
   Gasoline price rise.
   With becoming big it may be difficult to have
    effective control over quality.
   Vehicle quality has slipped in some places, and it
    has developed its own arrogance.
   With the full size heavy pick up, it assumed it
    could command the kind of premium it does on
    cars, and introduced too many vehicles with to
    many options‗
   Its trucks are simply too costly.
   It has to earn the pick up truck market, and it
    assumed otherwise.
Toyota
   Whether it is due to wits or good
    fortune, Toyota will become the No.1 car
    company in the U.S. sometime in the next
    year, and an American car operation will never
    hold that position again.

                                         — Douglas A. McIntyre
         (former Editor-in-Chief of Financial World Magazine and
            president of Switchboard.com)
Sony and Toray
Global Strategy
   At a time when global competition is
    intensifying, Sony and Toray, using different
    strategies, remain internationally competitive.
   Sony has continued to supply innovative products
    to the global market.
   Toray has ensured that
    procurement, production, and marketing are
    carried out in the most appropriate locations in the
    world.
   In a word, the former adopted the global-products
    strategy while the latter decided on the global-
    operations strategy.
South Korea
Samsung
   Continuing with its strategy of flooding the market
    with new gadgets, Samsung recently unveiled a
    plethora of mobile devices and PCs ranging from
    Smartphone, tablets, & phablets to smart cameras
    & ultra books.
   The multiple announcements included updates to
    some of Samsung‘s best-selling existing models
    such as the Galaxy Note as well as new product
    launches such as Series 5 and Series 7 Windows
    8 tablets and a ATIV S Windows Phone 8
    Smartphone.
Samsung
   The past year has seen Samsung gain a lot of
    share in the Smartphone market. Its market
    share has doubled to more than 36% in Q2
    2011 from about 18% during the same period
    preceding year.
   Currently it is the Global Market leader in
    Mobile Phone with record +35%.
   While Samsung has had a lot of success in the
    low-end of the market, it has been gradually
    increasing its presence in the high-end
    Smartphone market as well.
Samsung Vs. Apple Inc.
Samsung Vs. Apple Inc.
   Its main rival in the US had been the World‘s most
    valuable company in the History, Apple Inc.
   Its huge lead over Apple in the second quarter of
    2012, when it sold nearly twice as many
    Smartphone as Apple, was partly driven by the
    success of the Galaxy S III which sold more than
    10 million units in under two months !
   Its success can be attributed to its much larger
    portfolio of Smart phones that address more
    market segments than what other popular
    Smartphone such as the Apples' iPhone do.
But Apple‘s patent win could cause
a strategy shift
   However, Apple‘s recent patent win in U.S. worth
    $1.05 billion in compensation threatens to stop
    Samsung in its tracks.
   Having proven to the court that some of Samsung‘s
    products infringe upon its patents, Apple plans to use
    this as a precedent to press further charges against
    Samsung.
   It has already filed an injunction to ban the sale of
    eight of the patent-infringing Samsung devices in the
    U.S.
   If Apple succeeds in doing so, Samsung may see only
    a limited near-term impact considering that these
    devices are fairly old and are nearing the end of their
    product cycle.
Post Impacts of Apple‘s Patent
War
   While, in the near-term, this has little impact on
    Samsung‘s strategy of flooding the market with
    new similar-looking products, eventually it will
    have to start focusing on designing its
    products to look different from Apple‘s.
   This might cause delays in getting new
    products out in the market but it is difficult to
    say how much that will impact Samsung in the
    long-run considering the R&D resources it has
    at its disposal.
Post Impacts of Apple‘s Patent
War
   Apple‘s use of design patents can also cause
    Samsung to divert some of its resources to competing
    mobile ecosystems such as the Windows Phone.
   However, that would mean a return to ground zero for
    Samsung considering that Windows Phones currently
    command only about 3% market share.
   Eventually, we might have Samsung concentrating on
    Android for low-end Smartphone (where Apple has
    little interest) and on other platforms such as Windows
    Phone for high-end ones.
   This would prevent Samsung from leveraging its
    growing clout in the Android market and put a cap on
    its market share growth potential in the future.
Vizio Vs. Samsung-L.G.
   The US Electronic Company Vizio is giving a
    steady competition to the S. Korean Giants LG
    and Samsung.
   Vizio –U.S. brand – it sells its electronics such
    as HDTVs for lower or comparable prices to LG
    and Samsung.
   Employees of stores such as Wal-Mart say that
    it sells just as well as the other TVs and
    customers do not come back with problems.
Other South Korean Companies
   To Capture the US market the Korean
    companies LG, Samsung, Hyundai, Kia and
    others are focusing upon delivering Quality
    with a Competitive Pricing strategy.
   Still, the problem of Inflation can cause the
    Increased Cost of Production and Exports for
    them.
South Korean Companies in US
India
Information Technology
Outsourcing
   Expensive and Lesser no. of IT-Professionals
    call for Outsourcing to other Countries.
   India Outsources 56% of World‘s IT business.
   Low Costs and availability of World‘s
    maximum number of English Literates
    encourages the outsourcing for the US
    companies to India.
   TCS, Tata Consultancy
    Services, Infosys, Wipro, Mindtree etc. are
    major Indian players in the IT Industry.
US Companies Outsourcing to
India
   Mastek Limited: It is a premier P-CMM Level 3
    and SW-CMM Level 5 company which provides
    outsourcing in a number of segments like
    finance, banking, analytics, and logistics and so
    on. It has been in operations since two decades.
   Orcim Soft, Inc.: It offers a major portion of
    outsourcing jobs to India in various sectors. The
    main areas of expertise include software
    development, solutions in information technology
    and so on. The company has offices in various
    countries like United Kingdom, US and so on
US Companies Outsourcing to
India
   Well known global banks and financial
    organizations like CITIBANK, JP Morgan, GE
    Capital.
   IT giants like IBM, Microsoft.
   Some more well known companies which
    outsource to India are:
    Oracle, Dell Computer Support, Hewlett
    Packard, Schlumberger, ATT Wireless, Texas
    Electronics, TransUnion, Rand McNally
TATA
TATA- Nano U.S.A.
   India's biggest carmaker by revenue is
    increasingly dependent on its UK premium car
    subsidiary Jaguar Land Rover for growth to offset
    weakness in India.
   Hence, for making the Product global, U.S. is a
    market that the company is looking for.
   The company is looking to launch a next-
    generation version of its Nano, the world's
    cheapest car, for the US market in about three
    years.
   Nano for the United States is planned to have a
    bigger engine and more features, and to sell for
    under $10,000.
TATA- Nano U.S.A.
Submitted to: Dr. Prerna Kumar.
International Institute of Professional Studies, DAVV.
October 26, 2012.

More Related Content

What's hot

Auto Parts Manufacturing Industry Report - HF_L. Tamakloe
Auto Parts Manufacturing Industry Report - HF_L. TamakloeAuto Parts Manufacturing Industry Report - HF_L. Tamakloe
Auto Parts Manufacturing Industry Report - HF_L. Tamakloe
Liana Tamakloe
 
General motorz
General motorzGeneral motorz
General motorz
saranido
 
Ferris State CFA Report
Ferris State CFA ReportFerris State CFA Report
Ferris State CFA Report
Trevor Woirol
 
The High Stakes for the Trans-Pacific Partnership
The High Stakes for the Trans-Pacific PartnershipThe High Stakes for the Trans-Pacific Partnership
The High Stakes for the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Lewis Leibowitz
 
General Motors Presentation 100% complete
General Motors Presentation 100% completeGeneral Motors Presentation 100% complete
General Motors Presentation 100% complete
Andy Dacosta
 
General Motors by mayur
General Motors by mayurGeneral Motors by mayur
General Motors by mayur
mayur6789
 
Organizational Practices In Romania
Organizational Practices In RomaniaOrganizational Practices In Romania
Organizational Practices In Romania
venturaab
 
Cooper_Research_Notes
Cooper_Research_NotesCooper_Research_Notes
Cooper_Research_Notes
Ty Sheehan
 

What's hot (19)

Auto Parts Manufacturing Industry Report - HF_L. Tamakloe
Auto Parts Manufacturing Industry Report - HF_L. TamakloeAuto Parts Manufacturing Industry Report - HF_L. Tamakloe
Auto Parts Manufacturing Industry Report - HF_L. Tamakloe
 
General motors
General motorsGeneral motors
General motors
 
Gm Internet Marketing
Gm Internet MarketingGm Internet Marketing
Gm Internet Marketing
 
General motorz
General motorzGeneral motorz
General motorz
 
Defense Outlook 2015
Defense Outlook 2015Defense Outlook 2015
Defense Outlook 2015
 
Global capital market
Global capital marketGlobal capital market
Global capital market
 
May MarketMonitor
May MarketMonitor May MarketMonitor
May MarketMonitor
 
MBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power point
MBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power pointMBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power point
MBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power point
 
Ferris State CFA Report
Ferris State CFA ReportFerris State CFA Report
Ferris State CFA Report
 
The High Stakes for the Trans-Pacific Partnership
The High Stakes for the Trans-Pacific PartnershipThe High Stakes for the Trans-Pacific Partnership
The High Stakes for the Trans-Pacific Partnership
 
General Motors Presentation 100% complete
General Motors Presentation 100% completeGeneral Motors Presentation 100% complete
General Motors Presentation 100% complete
 
General Motors by mayur
General Motors by mayurGeneral Motors by mayur
General Motors by mayur
 
Organizational Practices In Romania
Organizational Practices In RomaniaOrganizational Practices In Romania
Organizational Practices In Romania
 
Cooper_Research_Notes
Cooper_Research_NotesCooper_Research_Notes
Cooper_Research_Notes
 
General Motors (Chevrolet India)- Marketing Decisions
General Motors (Chevrolet India)- Marketing DecisionsGeneral Motors (Chevrolet India)- Marketing Decisions
General Motors (Chevrolet India)- Marketing Decisions
 
G E N E R A L M O T O R S
G E N E R A L  M O T O R SG E N E R A L  M O T O R S
G E N E R A L M O T O R S
 
General motors
General motorsGeneral motors
General motors
 
Organisation case studies
Organisation case studiesOrganisation case studies
Organisation case studies
 
Terms of trade
Terms of tradeTerms of trade
Terms of trade
 

Viewers also liked

Master Thesis in International Marketing
Master Thesis in International MarketingMaster Thesis in International Marketing
Master Thesis in International Marketing
Joep Van den Brink
 
Dissertation International Marketing Management Sample
Dissertation International Marketing Management SampleDissertation International Marketing Management Sample
Dissertation International Marketing Management Sample
DissertationFirst
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Master Thesis in International Marketing
Master Thesis in International MarketingMaster Thesis in International Marketing
Master Thesis in International Marketing
 
Business environment PPT INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT MBA
Business environment  PPT INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT MBABusiness environment  PPT INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT MBA
Business environment PPT INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT MBA
 
Dissertation International Marketing Management Sample
Dissertation International Marketing Management SampleDissertation International Marketing Management Sample
Dissertation International Marketing Management Sample
 
Marketing Thesis Report 2
Marketing Thesis Report 2Marketing Thesis Report 2
Marketing Thesis Report 2
 
Marketing Thesis Report
Marketing Thesis ReportMarketing Thesis Report
Marketing Thesis Report
 
Marketing Thesis Report 1
Marketing Thesis Report 1Marketing Thesis Report 1
Marketing Thesis Report 1
 

Similar to International Markrting in USA

Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docxToyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
edwardmarivel
 
Chevorlet all the way
Chevorlet all the wayChevorlet all the way
Chevorlet all the way
sanjay p
 

Similar to International Markrting in USA (8)

Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docxToyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
 
Toyota
ToyotaToyota
Toyota
 
Japanese Marketing Case Study52
Japanese Marketing Case Study52Japanese Marketing Case Study52
Japanese Marketing Case Study52
 
Chevorlet all the way
Chevorlet all the wayChevorlet all the way
Chevorlet all the way
 
Toyota case
Toyota caseToyota case
Toyota case
 
Toyota case individual project 1
Toyota case individual project 1Toyota case individual project 1
Toyota case individual project 1
 
14.05.pptx
14.05.pptx14.05.pptx
14.05.pptx
 
Ge toyota manufacturing
Ge toyota manufacturingGe toyota manufacturing
Ge toyota manufacturing
 

More from Ankur Pandey

More from Ankur Pandey (20)

Ceo world's leading businesss empire
Ceo world's leading businesss empireCeo world's leading businesss empire
Ceo world's leading businesss empire
 
Hollywood Actress Nude
Hollywood Actress NudeHollywood Actress Nude
Hollywood Actress Nude
 
Mobile Network Operators- India
Mobile Network Operators- IndiaMobile Network Operators- India
Mobile Network Operators- India
 
Highest Grossing Bollywood Films
Highest Grossing Bollywood FilmsHighest Grossing Bollywood Films
Highest Grossing Bollywood Films
 
IRCTC
IRCTCIRCTC
IRCTC
 
Indore
IndoreIndore
Indore
 
India
IndiaIndia
India
 
IMF
IMFIMF
IMF
 
IFRS
IFRSIFRS
IFRS
 
HSBC
HSBCHSBC
HSBC
 
Banking General Awareness
Banking General AwarenessBanking General Awareness
Banking General Awareness
 
FDI-Retail in India
FDI-Retail in IndiaFDI-Retail in India
FDI-Retail in India
 
European Union
European UnionEuropean Union
European Union
 
Economy of USA
Economy of USAEconomy of USA
Economy of USA
 
Economy of India
Economy of IndiaEconomy of India
Economy of India
 
EBAY
EBAYEBAY
EBAY
 
Cadbury
CadburyCadbury
Cadbury
 
BSE- Bombay Stock Exchange
BSE- Bombay Stock ExchangeBSE- Bombay Stock Exchange
BSE- Bombay Stock Exchange
 
Brands in India
Brands in IndiaBrands in India
Brands in India
 
Bollywood’s fastest 100 crore grosser of all times
Bollywood’s fastest 100 crore grosser of all timesBollywood’s fastest 100 crore grosser of all times
Bollywood’s fastest 100 crore grosser of all times
 

International Markrting in USA

  • 1. INTERNATIONAL MARKETING STRATEGIES OF FOREIGN COMPANIES IN: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ANKUR PANDEY (IM-2K8-007) ABHIRAJ PATEL (IM-2K8-001)
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4. ECONOMY  Rank: 1st (nominal) / 1st (PPP)  Currency: US$ (USD)  Fiscal year: October 1 – September 30  GDP: $15.776 trillion (September 2012)  GDP growth: 2.3% (September 2011–September 2012)  GDP per Capita: $48,450 (2011; 14th, nominal; 6th, PPP)  GDP by Sector: Agriculture- 1.2%; Industry- 19.2%, Services- 79.6% (2011 est.)  Nature of Economy: Mixed
  • 5. Credit rating  Standard & Poor's: AA+ (Domestic) AA+ (Foreign) AAA (T&C Assessment) Outlook: Negative  Moody's: AAA Outlook: Negative  Fitch: AAA Outlook: Negative
  • 6. Economic History  The economic history of the United States has its roots in European settlements in the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries.  The American colonies went from marginally successful colonial economies to a small, independent farming economy, which in 1776 became the United States of America.  In 180 years the United States grew to a huge, integrated, industrialized economy that still makes up over a quarter of the world economy.  The United States has been the world's largest national economy since at least the 1920s
  • 7. BUSINESS ENVIORNMENT  10th in ‘FORBES- Top 10 Countries For Business-2012’  10th in ‘2012 index of Economic Freedom’  23rd in ‘The Enabling Trade Index-2012’  18th in ‘Economic freedom of the world 2012’  4th in ‘Ease of doing Business’ and 13th in ‘Starting a Business’ according to World Bank Reports-2012.
  • 8. Trade Facts  Venture capital, as an industry, originated in the United States and it is still dominated by the U.S  Out of World's 500 largest companies, 133 are Of the headquartered in the United States !  There are more than 250 general and special purpose zones in the United States, including The North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA.
  • 9. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW  According to a report of the Harvard Business Review in March 2012, by Michael E. Porter and Jan W. Rivkin  This research finds two sets of avoidable causes that can improve the business environment in the US.
  • 10. The First Cause  First are poor policies.  The U.S. government is failing to tackle weaknesses in the business environment that are making the country a less attractive place to invest and are nullifying some of America‘s most important competitive strengths.  The government has also failed to eliminate distortions in the international trading and investment system that disadvantage the United States.
  • 11. The Second Cause  Second, in the rush to globalize, companies have overlooked current and latent advantages of a U.S. location.  Many factors affect the profitability of operating in a certain locale: wage levels, skills availability, utility rates, taxes, subsidies, shipping costs and reliability, local productivity, supervision costs, and many more.  These factors are complex, interrelated, and dynamic.  Locating an activity in one country often has ripple effects on activities elsewhere.
  • 12. The Second Cause  Because many companies are still learning how to weigh these factors— indeed, processes for making location decisions have lagged behind those for virtually all other major investment decisions— companies can fall prey to biases that work against the U.S.
  • 13. Suggestions…  According to the Report,  If the U.S. can tackle some of its weaknesses as a business location, there are grounds for optimism.  Important trends are beginning to favor a U.S. location, such as rapidly rising wages in emerging economies, increasing transportation and logistical costs, and shortening product life cycles, which makes ―near-shoring‖ attractive.  Companies are also starting to understand the hidden costs of off-shoring and to see and act on their ability to improve business environments in their U.S. communities.
  • 14. Foreign Companies in US Japanese South Korean Indian (Covered in this Presentation)
  • 15. Japan
  • 16. Challenges for Japanese Companies  Americans have been quite Conservative and repulsive for Japanese competitors. It can be explained in the following Cases.  Two highly publicized rulings in particular by U.S. juries awarding very substantial damages for patent infringement against Japanese companies confirmed fears in Japan that the American jury system is often biased against large Japanese companies.
  • 17. Minolta-Honeywell  Minolta had infringed Honeywell patents covering autofocus camera lens technology and had been ordered to pay $96 million in damages by the Jury.  Later, Minolta ultimately settled the case for $127.5 million.
  • 18. Nintendo  Likewise, Jury ordered Nintendo to pay $208 million to a bankrupt U.S. company for infringement of its patent covering video games.  Another Japanese video game manufacturer had previously settled with the U.S. patent owner prior to the ruling.
  • 19. Smith-Corona vs. Brother: from defense to offense  The most well known affirmative use of the U.S. antidumping laws by a Japanese company arose out of the filing of an antidumping petition in 1979 by Smith Corona Corporation against imports of portable electric typewriters ("PETs") from Japan.  A number of Japanese producers of PETs, including Brother Industries, were named as respondents in the antidumping investigation initiated as a result of Smith Corona's petition.
  • 20. How did they Respond ?  When confronted with unreasonable demands from their competitors, Japanese companies no longer did capitulate, but readily challenged these demands by going to court.  They might not have always been successful in these endeavors, but their perseverance has earned them the grudging respect of their American and foreign competition.  Their strategy has even begun to be emulated by some of their foreign competitors.  Japanese businessmen have, indeed, enacted this aspect of their strategy for doing business in the United States "broadly, correctly and openly"
  • 22. Toyota  Ranked 1st among top vehicle manufacturing groups (Volume), end of year production-2010 by the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA).  Toyota's (TM) share of the U.S. light vehicle market is 18% and Honda's (HMC) is 10%. GM's (GM) share of its home market is about 22%.  Fifty-five years ago, the No.1 U.S. car company had 54% of the U.S. market. By this time next year, GM's piece of the American car pie could drop another 50%, bringing it closer to Honda's.  There is vast opportunity as it is said that GM and Chrysler, after years of poor management or bad luck will lose a tremendous amount of business if they continue operating in bankruptcy.
  • 23. Toyota  Toyota has played well in a long waiting game in and made better cars than U.S. companies.  It Kept labor costs low and built a reputation for durable and dependable products.  being hurt by the global car sales downturn, it never had the labor cost or corporate debt problems that plagued GM.  It has the balance sheet to make it through the crisis.  ‗Maybe Toyota has been lucky for decades or maybe Toyota was just smart‘
  • 25. Toyota Vs. GM, according to Peter Morici, professor at the Smith School of Business, University of Maryland School, and former Chief Economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission.
  • 26. Toyota Vs. GM  Toyota enjoys much lower labor costs in the United States.  Benefits from an undervalued yen for cars made in Japan. In the United States, this comes to about $2500 per vehicle.  The entry level and middle level market segments are very sensitive to price and vehicle durability.  Toyota has been able to translate its cost advantage into vehicles with higher, more attractive content and longer life than General Motors.  It's Camry and Corolla, and derivatives of those cars, have been able to dominate their market spaces and have even set the standard others must follow and they establish the price thresholds.
  • 27. Strategies  Toyota is constantly looking for ways to lower costs and improve products.  It translates most of the additional profits it earns, over GM, into better product design and additional capacity.  At GM, the Executives vote themselves bonuses and the union demands more benefits and featherbedding at the first sign of profits
  • 28. Toyota Diverging & GM Converging !  While G.M. is closing its factories in its native country, Toyota is opening its new plants in North America. This is because:  It offers customers cars that are less expensive and less trouble to own, over the life of the cars.  Toyota's don't break as much and perform well.  GM vehicles require more repairs and don't age well.
  • 29. "Wake up America and Buy American"  The native slogan "Wake up America and Buy American" of GM may not affect the future of Toyota in the US market.  Thanks to big bonuses to executives, outsized fringe benefits for the UAW, poor product quality and just plain arrogance GM and the UAW have lost the loyalty of American car buyers.  Americans are not protectionist in their buying habits, and GM executives and the UAW have lost the trust and loyalty of many younger car buyers.
  • 30. Toyota Tundra  The full-size pick-up truck segment is considered to be the most profitable and the fastest-growing segment in a slow-growing US automobile industry.  Highly competitive with players like Ford and General Motors dominating the industry.  The World‘s largest Company- 2011, Toyota, aimed to increase its share in the light truck segment through the launch of a new pick-up truck model in early 2007, called Tundra.
  • 32. Toyota Tundra  In the market for pick-up trucks, the buyers were known to be tremendously loyal to trucks made by American companies.  in its efforts to market Tundra, Toyota promoted the pick-up truck at events considered to be traditionally American such as NASCAR racing, fishing tournaments, country-western concerts, etc.  The company also made an investment of $850 million to establish a new plant at San Antonio, Texas, for manufacturing only Tundra vehicles and set a sales target of 200,000 units in 2007.
  • 33. Toyota Prius  Due to constant Innovations in Technology and Increasing fuel prices, Toyota has Innovated the first Hybrid vehicle in 2008, Toyota Prius, having dual power consumption operating on Petrol and Electric engine.  The company has placed it in the Segment between Corolla and Camery and Marketed it as of a Higher Segments.
  • 35. Threats for Toyota Motors  Gasoline price rise.  With becoming big it may be difficult to have effective control over quality.  Vehicle quality has slipped in some places, and it has developed its own arrogance.  With the full size heavy pick up, it assumed it could command the kind of premium it does on cars, and introduced too many vehicles with to many options‗  Its trucks are simply too costly.  It has to earn the pick up truck market, and it assumed otherwise.
  • 36. Toyota  Whether it is due to wits or good fortune, Toyota will become the No.1 car company in the U.S. sometime in the next year, and an American car operation will never hold that position again. — Douglas A. McIntyre (former Editor-in-Chief of Financial World Magazine and president of Switchboard.com)
  • 38. Global Strategy  At a time when global competition is intensifying, Sony and Toray, using different strategies, remain internationally competitive.  Sony has continued to supply innovative products to the global market.  Toray has ensured that procurement, production, and marketing are carried out in the most appropriate locations in the world.  In a word, the former adopted the global-products strategy while the latter decided on the global- operations strategy.
  • 40. Samsung  Continuing with its strategy of flooding the market with new gadgets, Samsung recently unveiled a plethora of mobile devices and PCs ranging from Smartphone, tablets, & phablets to smart cameras & ultra books.  The multiple announcements included updates to some of Samsung‘s best-selling existing models such as the Galaxy Note as well as new product launches such as Series 5 and Series 7 Windows 8 tablets and a ATIV S Windows Phone 8 Smartphone.
  • 41. Samsung  The past year has seen Samsung gain a lot of share in the Smartphone market. Its market share has doubled to more than 36% in Q2 2011 from about 18% during the same period preceding year.  Currently it is the Global Market leader in Mobile Phone with record +35%.  While Samsung has had a lot of success in the low-end of the market, it has been gradually increasing its presence in the high-end Smartphone market as well.
  • 43. Samsung Vs. Apple Inc.  Its main rival in the US had been the World‘s most valuable company in the History, Apple Inc.  Its huge lead over Apple in the second quarter of 2012, when it sold nearly twice as many Smartphone as Apple, was partly driven by the success of the Galaxy S III which sold more than 10 million units in under two months !  Its success can be attributed to its much larger portfolio of Smart phones that address more market segments than what other popular Smartphone such as the Apples' iPhone do.
  • 44. But Apple‘s patent win could cause a strategy shift  However, Apple‘s recent patent win in U.S. worth $1.05 billion in compensation threatens to stop Samsung in its tracks.  Having proven to the court that some of Samsung‘s products infringe upon its patents, Apple plans to use this as a precedent to press further charges against Samsung.  It has already filed an injunction to ban the sale of eight of the patent-infringing Samsung devices in the U.S.  If Apple succeeds in doing so, Samsung may see only a limited near-term impact considering that these devices are fairly old and are nearing the end of their product cycle.
  • 45. Post Impacts of Apple‘s Patent War  While, in the near-term, this has little impact on Samsung‘s strategy of flooding the market with new similar-looking products, eventually it will have to start focusing on designing its products to look different from Apple‘s.  This might cause delays in getting new products out in the market but it is difficult to say how much that will impact Samsung in the long-run considering the R&D resources it has at its disposal.
  • 46. Post Impacts of Apple‘s Patent War  Apple‘s use of design patents can also cause Samsung to divert some of its resources to competing mobile ecosystems such as the Windows Phone.  However, that would mean a return to ground zero for Samsung considering that Windows Phones currently command only about 3% market share.  Eventually, we might have Samsung concentrating on Android for low-end Smartphone (where Apple has little interest) and on other platforms such as Windows Phone for high-end ones.  This would prevent Samsung from leveraging its growing clout in the Android market and put a cap on its market share growth potential in the future.
  • 47. Vizio Vs. Samsung-L.G.  The US Electronic Company Vizio is giving a steady competition to the S. Korean Giants LG and Samsung.  Vizio –U.S. brand – it sells its electronics such as HDTVs for lower or comparable prices to LG and Samsung.  Employees of stores such as Wal-Mart say that it sells just as well as the other TVs and customers do not come back with problems.
  • 48. Other South Korean Companies  To Capture the US market the Korean companies LG, Samsung, Hyundai, Kia and others are focusing upon delivering Quality with a Competitive Pricing strategy.  Still, the problem of Inflation can cause the Increased Cost of Production and Exports for them.
  • 50. India
  • 51. Information Technology Outsourcing  Expensive and Lesser no. of IT-Professionals call for Outsourcing to other Countries.  India Outsources 56% of World‘s IT business.  Low Costs and availability of World‘s maximum number of English Literates encourages the outsourcing for the US companies to India.  TCS, Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, Wipro, Mindtree etc. are major Indian players in the IT Industry.
  • 52. US Companies Outsourcing to India  Mastek Limited: It is a premier P-CMM Level 3 and SW-CMM Level 5 company which provides outsourcing in a number of segments like finance, banking, analytics, and logistics and so on. It has been in operations since two decades.  Orcim Soft, Inc.: It offers a major portion of outsourcing jobs to India in various sectors. The main areas of expertise include software development, solutions in information technology and so on. The company has offices in various countries like United Kingdom, US and so on
  • 53. US Companies Outsourcing to India  Well known global banks and financial organizations like CITIBANK, JP Morgan, GE Capital.  IT giants like IBM, Microsoft.  Some more well known companies which outsource to India are: Oracle, Dell Computer Support, Hewlett Packard, Schlumberger, ATT Wireless, Texas Electronics, TransUnion, Rand McNally
  • 54. TATA
  • 55. TATA- Nano U.S.A.  India's biggest carmaker by revenue is increasingly dependent on its UK premium car subsidiary Jaguar Land Rover for growth to offset weakness in India.  Hence, for making the Product global, U.S. is a market that the company is looking for.  The company is looking to launch a next- generation version of its Nano, the world's cheapest car, for the US market in about three years.  Nano for the United States is planned to have a bigger engine and more features, and to sell for under $10,000.
  • 57. Submitted to: Dr. Prerna Kumar. International Institute of Professional Studies, DAVV. October 26, 2012.