SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Short 1
Emily Short
Mr. Lee Bullock
WRD111-031
25 April 2013
Mental Illness Group
The group that presented about mental illness consisted of Emily (myself), Kat, Robyn,
and Nick. Overall our group was productive and got the job done, although there were some
minor setbacks. I was lucky to be a part of a group with people with such strong ideas. The
following paragraphs are how I felt about their work in the group.
First, I will rate Kat. I believe that Kat deserves a two. I think that she deserves this rating
for a few reasons. She would come to class consistently, however she did not always have the
work done. When her work was finished it was good work, but it seemed as if it was not always
done on time. Also, when we presented our speech she was not prepared with note cards and had
no choice but to use her formal outline on her laptop. Despite these few issues, she was a good
group member and was respectful to everyone in the group. That is why I believe she deserves a
two.
Second, I will rate Robyn. I believe that Robyn deserves a three. Robyn was always in
class and she always came prepared. She was the one who was to introduce and conclude our
speech so it was difficult for her to write her part without the rest of the group's work, but she got
it done and she did her work well. Also, when we had group time she contributed greatly and
treated everyone in the group with respect. That is why I believe that Robyn deserves a three.
Third, I will rate Nick. I believe that Nick deserves a two. Nick always put forth the best
effort in the group and always had his work done. However, he seemed to always want to be in
Short 2
control. Although this is just his nature, at times it seemed like he was bossing the rest of the
group around. Nick was always in class and always willing to do the work he needed to do, but
he did not treat the group with equality until the very end of the project and that is why I believe
that he deserves a two.
Lastly, I will rate myself. I personally believe that I deserve a two. I always had my work
done and did the best work that I could, but I missed quite a few classes. Although this did not
seem to hold my group back I still believe that by missing so many classes I was not the perfect
group member. I also believe that I was respectful to my group members and I did the best I
could to take charge and make sure everyone had everything ready to go for the speech. That is
why I believe I deserve a two.
I believe that my specific group was a great group. We all have strong personalities and
that made the group interesting and lively. We always participated as much as we could and all
put forth effort to make sure we were getting the work done. Although there was a point where
our group seemed to get out of synch and have some issues, we got it together and got the work
done and performed a great speech. I believe that this group speech experience in WRD111 is
great because giving a group speech is a wonderful skill to have. It is not always easy to work in
a group, especially with people you do not know that well, and that is why it is great that we now
have done this and have practice doing this. Through this experience I have learned that it is very
important to make sure that all members of a group have equal responsibilities and treat each
other equally. It is good to have a leader, but not in a way that they are the "boss" of all of the
other members. I also learned that it is good to have specific deadlines that are ahead of the
actual deadline so that all members can discuss their work and make sure it all makes sense
together. Overall this experience was great and I learned a lot about group work as a whole.

More Related Content

Similar to Group eval

Lee lisa teamleadershipproject_november2014_80ba139f-7dd0-445e-8856-a8c162fe04cd
Lee lisa teamleadershipproject_november2014_80ba139f-7dd0-445e-8856-a8c162fe04cdLee lisa teamleadershipproject_november2014_80ba139f-7dd0-445e-8856-a8c162fe04cd
Lee lisa teamleadershipproject_november2014_80ba139f-7dd0-445e-8856-a8c162fe04cdLisa Lee
 
Class of 2011 feedback
Class of 2011 feedbackClass of 2011 feedback
Class of 2011 feedbackPaul Kierney
 
Journal Social Psychology
Journal Social PsychologyJournal Social Psychology
Journal Social Psychology_NabilaHanim
 
Our presentation (draft one)
Our presentation (draft one)Our presentation (draft one)
Our presentation (draft one)weihoon
 
Journal (Assignment 1).docx
Journal (Assignment 1).docxJournal (Assignment 1).docx
Journal (Assignment 1).docxShze Hwa Lee
 
Team-Building Does Not Always Build a TeamA Behaviora.docx
Team-Building Does Not Always Build a TeamA Behaviora.docxTeam-Building Does Not Always Build a TeamA Behaviora.docx
Team-Building Does Not Always Build a TeamA Behaviora.docxmattinsonjanel
 
PSYCHO JOURNAL.docx
PSYCHO JOURNAL.docxPSYCHO JOURNAL.docx
PSYCHO JOURNAL.docxwynjaneng
 
Psychology assignment 1 - journal
Psychology assignment 1 - journalPsychology assignment 1 - journal
Psychology assignment 1 - journalSheng Zhe
 
Dhivyaadevi personality assignment
Dhivyaadevi personality assignmentDhivyaadevi personality assignment
Dhivyaadevi personality assignmentdhivyaadiva
 
Final Report
Final Report Final Report
Final Report Lin Hui
 
Austin - portfolio project presentation
Austin  - portfolio project presentationAustin  - portfolio project presentation
Austin - portfolio project presentationAustin Riley
 

Similar to Group eval (20)

Practice Paper
Practice PaperPractice Paper
Practice Paper
 
Lee lisa teamleadershipproject_november2014_80ba139f-7dd0-445e-8856-a8c162fe04cd
Lee lisa teamleadershipproject_november2014_80ba139f-7dd0-445e-8856-a8c162fe04cdLee lisa teamleadershipproject_november2014_80ba139f-7dd0-445e-8856-a8c162fe04cd
Lee lisa teamleadershipproject_november2014_80ba139f-7dd0-445e-8856-a8c162fe04cd
 
Class of 2011 feedback
Class of 2011 feedbackClass of 2011 feedback
Class of 2011 feedback
 
Journal Social Psychology
Journal Social PsychologyJournal Social Psychology
Journal Social Psychology
 
Psycho 2
Psycho 2Psycho 2
Psycho 2
 
Our presentation (draft one)
Our presentation (draft one)Our presentation (draft one)
Our presentation (draft one)
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Journal (Assignment 1).docx
Journal (Assignment 1).docxJournal (Assignment 1).docx
Journal (Assignment 1).docx
 
Team-Building Does Not Always Build a TeamA Behaviora.docx
Team-Building Does Not Always Build a TeamA Behaviora.docxTeam-Building Does Not Always Build a TeamA Behaviora.docx
Team-Building Does Not Always Build a TeamA Behaviora.docx
 
PSYCHO JOURNAL.docx
PSYCHO JOURNAL.docxPSYCHO JOURNAL.docx
PSYCHO JOURNAL.docx
 
Psycho report
Psycho reportPsycho report
Psycho report
 
Psycho report
Psycho reportPsycho report
Psycho report
 
Psychology assignment 1 - journal
Psychology assignment 1 - journalPsychology assignment 1 - journal
Psychology assignment 1 - journal
 
Dhivyaadevi personality assignment
Dhivyaadevi personality assignmentDhivyaadevi personality assignment
Dhivyaadevi personality assignment
 
Final Report
Final Report Final Report
Final Report
 
Reflection slidedoc
Reflection slidedocReflection slidedoc
Reflection slidedoc
 
Journal1
Journal1Journal1
Journal1
 
Aniano-LP.docx
Aniano-LP.docxAniano-LP.docx
Aniano-LP.docx
 
Group Evaluation Essay
Group Evaluation EssayGroup Evaluation Essay
Group Evaluation Essay
 
Austin - portfolio project presentation
Austin  - portfolio project presentationAustin  - portfolio project presentation
Austin - portfolio project presentation
 

More from emilyshort1

Boys Don't Cry Poster 2
Boys Don't Cry Poster 2Boys Don't Cry Poster 2
Boys Don't Cry Poster 2emilyshort1
 
Boys Don't Cry Poster 1
Boys Don't Cry Poster 1Boys Don't Cry Poster 1
Boys Don't Cry Poster 1emilyshort1
 
Podcast transcript
Podcast transcriptPodcast transcript
Podcast transcriptemilyshort1
 
Rhetorical analysis essay
Rhetorical analysis essayRhetorical analysis essay
Rhetorical analysis essayemilyshort1
 
Final reflection
Final reflectionFinal reflection
Final reflectionemilyshort1
 
Eighty Hours of Change
Eighty Hours of ChangeEighty Hours of Change
Eighty Hours of Changeemilyshort1
 
Northern Lights Shift
Northern Lights ShiftNorthern Lights Shift
Northern Lights Shiftemilyshort1
 

More from emilyshort1 (10)

Boys Don't Cry Poster 2
Boys Don't Cry Poster 2Boys Don't Cry Poster 2
Boys Don't Cry Poster 2
 
Boys Don't Cry Poster 1
Boys Don't Cry Poster 1Boys Don't Cry Poster 1
Boys Don't Cry Poster 1
 
Podcast transcript
Podcast transcriptPodcast transcript
Podcast transcript
 
Rhetorical analysis essay
Rhetorical analysis essayRhetorical analysis essay
Rhetorical analysis essay
 
Final reflection
Final reflectionFinal reflection
Final reflection
 
Interview
InterviewInterview
Interview
 
P2 essay
P2 essayP2 essay
P2 essay
 
Project 2
Project 2Project 2
Project 2
 
Eighty Hours of Change
Eighty Hours of ChangeEighty Hours of Change
Eighty Hours of Change
 
Northern Lights Shift
Northern Lights ShiftNorthern Lights Shift
Northern Lights Shift
 

Group eval

  • 1. Short 1 Emily Short Mr. Lee Bullock WRD111-031 25 April 2013 Mental Illness Group The group that presented about mental illness consisted of Emily (myself), Kat, Robyn, and Nick. Overall our group was productive and got the job done, although there were some minor setbacks. I was lucky to be a part of a group with people with such strong ideas. The following paragraphs are how I felt about their work in the group. First, I will rate Kat. I believe that Kat deserves a two. I think that she deserves this rating for a few reasons. She would come to class consistently, however she did not always have the work done. When her work was finished it was good work, but it seemed as if it was not always done on time. Also, when we presented our speech she was not prepared with note cards and had no choice but to use her formal outline on her laptop. Despite these few issues, she was a good group member and was respectful to everyone in the group. That is why I believe she deserves a two. Second, I will rate Robyn. I believe that Robyn deserves a three. Robyn was always in class and she always came prepared. She was the one who was to introduce and conclude our speech so it was difficult for her to write her part without the rest of the group's work, but she got it done and she did her work well. Also, when we had group time she contributed greatly and treated everyone in the group with respect. That is why I believe that Robyn deserves a three. Third, I will rate Nick. I believe that Nick deserves a two. Nick always put forth the best effort in the group and always had his work done. However, he seemed to always want to be in
  • 2. Short 2 control. Although this is just his nature, at times it seemed like he was bossing the rest of the group around. Nick was always in class and always willing to do the work he needed to do, but he did not treat the group with equality until the very end of the project and that is why I believe that he deserves a two. Lastly, I will rate myself. I personally believe that I deserve a two. I always had my work done and did the best work that I could, but I missed quite a few classes. Although this did not seem to hold my group back I still believe that by missing so many classes I was not the perfect group member. I also believe that I was respectful to my group members and I did the best I could to take charge and make sure everyone had everything ready to go for the speech. That is why I believe I deserve a two. I believe that my specific group was a great group. We all have strong personalities and that made the group interesting and lively. We always participated as much as we could and all put forth effort to make sure we were getting the work done. Although there was a point where our group seemed to get out of synch and have some issues, we got it together and got the work done and performed a great speech. I believe that this group speech experience in WRD111 is great because giving a group speech is a wonderful skill to have. It is not always easy to work in a group, especially with people you do not know that well, and that is why it is great that we now have done this and have practice doing this. Through this experience I have learned that it is very important to make sure that all members of a group have equal responsibilities and treat each other equally. It is good to have a leader, but not in a way that they are the "boss" of all of the other members. I also learned that it is good to have specific deadlines that are ahead of the actual deadline so that all members can discuss their work and make sure it all makes sense together. Overall this experience was great and I learned a lot about group work as a whole.