Discussion 2: Predictor Effectiveness in Criterion Measure Estimation
After a potential predictor of employee performance is identified, it is necessary to observe its relationship with one or more criterion measure(s) of work related behaviors and/or performance. The criterion measures selected for employee performance predictors usually align with job-related tasks, behaviors, and outcomes. Depending on the specificity of the criterion, an in-depth analysis of the job may or may not be needed. How relevant are organizational factors such as turnover and absenteeism? How relevant is an employee’s personality or credit history? The criterion should dictate what you are measuring. Criterion measures should be selected based on job relevance, the relationship with chosen employee performance predictors, stability, and alignment with organizational outcomes (Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc., 2003).
For this Discussion, select two employee performance predictors described in Learning Resources and current literature. Consider how each may or may not be effective in predicting sales performance.
Post a descriptions of the two predictors you selected. Explain which might be the most and least effective predictors of sales performance as a criterion measure. Provide concrete examples and citations from the Learning Resources and current literature to justify your post. 1.5 pages, at least 4 references in APA Style
Example 1:
Descriptions of the two predictors you selected
My options have been narrowed to aptitude testing and the experience listed on the applicant’s resume.
Explain which might be the most and least effective predictors of sales performance as a criterion measure.
Effective personnel assessment involves a systematic approach towards gathering information about applicants’ job qualifications, such as the applicant’s resume. Factors contributing to successful job performance, such as oral communication (interview) or problem solving (aptitude test) are identified using a process called job analysis. Job analysis identifies the duties performed on the job and the competencies needed for effective job performance. Basing personnel assessment closely on job analysis results makes the connection between job requirements and personnel assessment tools more transparent, thereby improving the perceived fairness of the assessment process (U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 2007).
Criterion measurement is the empirical and concrete evidence that can be quantified. The strongest predictor that achieves this would-be aptitude testing. Aptitude testing can be designed to fit the specific jobs; in this case, the salesperson position. Testing can be done on things such as spelling and sentence composition. A salesperson must possess the ability to communicate not only orally, but must also possess the ability to compose and correspond in writing. The aptitude test can be quantified by a score that ranges from 0-100. Appl.
1. Discussion 2: Predictor Effectiveness in Criterion Measure
Estimation
After a potential predictor of employee performance is
identified, it is necessary to observe its relationship with one or
more criterion measure(s) of work related behaviors and/or
performance. The criterion measures selected for employee
performance predictors usually align with job-related tasks,
behaviors, and outcomes. Depending on the specificity of the
criterion, an in-depth analysis of the job may or may not be
needed. How relevant are organizational factors such as
turnover and absenteeism? How relevant is an employee’s
personality or credit history? The criterion should dictate what
you are measuring. Criterion measures should be selected based
on job relevance, the relationship with chosen employee
performance predictors, stability, and alignment with
organizational outcomes (Society for Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, Inc., 2003).
For this Discussion, select two employee performance
predictors described in Learning Resources and current
literature. Consider how each may or may not be effective in
predicting sales performance.
Post a descriptions of the two predictors you selected. Explain
which might be the most and least effective predictors of sales
performance as a criterion measure. Provide concrete examples
and citations from the Learning Resources and current literature
to justify your post. 1.5 pages, at least 4 references in APA
Style
Example 1:
Descriptions of the two predictors you selected
My options have been narrowed to aptitude testing and the
experience listed on the applicant’s resume.
Explain which might be the most and least effective predictors
of sales performance as a criterion measure.
Effective personnel assessment involves a systematic approach
2. towards gathering information about applicants’ job
qualifications, such as the applicant’s resume. Factors
contributing to successful job performance, such as oral
communication (interview) or problem solving (aptitude test)
are identified using a process called job analysis. Job analysis
identifies the duties performed on the job and the competencies
needed for effective job performance. Basing personnel
assessment closely on job analysis results makes the connection
between job requirements and personnel assessment tools more
transparent, thereby improving the perceived fairness of the
assessment process (U.S. Office of Personnel Management,
2007).
Criterion measurement is the empirical and concrete evidence
that can be quantified. The strongest predictor that achieves this
would-be aptitude testing. Aptitude testing can be designed to
fit the specific jobs; in this case, the salesperson position.
Testing can be done on things such as spelling and sentence
composition. A salesperson must possess the ability to
communicate not only orally, but must also possess the ability
to compose and correspond in writing. The aptitude test can be
quantified by a score that ranges from 0-100. Applicants could
be selected based on their score, and if there is a tie, the
selection could then move to the experience listed on the
applicants’ resumes.
Provide concrete examples and citations from the Learning
Resources and current literature to justify your post.
Predictive validity compares the measure in question (aptitude
testing) with an outcome assessed later (APA, 1974). An
organization could implement an aptitude test for selection, then
compare it to sales that are recorded over time. This would give
the organization an idea if there is a relationship between the
aptitude of the applicant and their ability to sale. Personality
tests could essentially “predict” how a person might perform,
but some argue that the responses of the applicants may not be
genuine. A common criticism of the use of personality
assessments for selection purposes is the possibility that job
3. applicants might engage in response distortion or faking (e.g.,
Morgeson et al., 2007).
REFERENCES
American Psychological Association, Inc. (1974). "Standards
for educational & psychological
tests" Washington D. C.: Author.
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck,
J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N.
(2007). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms
with limitations in the use of
personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel
Psychology, 60(4), 1029-1049.
Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel selection.
Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1),
419–450. Personnel Selection by Sackett, P. R., &
Lieven, F. in Annual Review of
Psychology, vol 59. Copyright 2008 by Annual
Reviews, Inc. Reprinted by permission of
Annual Reviews, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance
Center.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2007). Assessment
decision guide. Retrieved from
http://apps.opm.gov/ADT/ContentFiles/AssessmentDecisionGui
de071807.pdf on
March 2017.
Example 2:
The two predictors selected were personality test and work
sample. Often times organizations rely on personality test in
employment selection to learn more, than the general KSAO's,
an individual may possess. Through personality testing, an
employer can gain insight as to how an individual might
respond and interact with others (Baez, 2013). Personality
pertains to one's thoughts, feelings, behavioral patterns and they
vary from person to person (Bauer & Erdogan, 2010). Big Five-
4. personality measure is a commonly used model that has been
connected to job performance.
Previous research has shown to support the belief that
personality measures predict performance; in particular, Big
Five personality factors have shown that conscientiousness and
stability have a general relationship with job performance
(Bartram, 2005). The Big Five-personality dimensions of
extraversion and conscientiousness has been shown to predict
sales success when specifically looking at potency and
achievement (Vinchur, Schippmann, Switzer & Roth, 1998).
However, Schmitt, Cortina, Ingerick, & Wiechmann (2003) note
the Big Five personality model is too broad and a previous
study conducted by Sackett et al. (1998) failed to find
supporting evidence connecting personality and ability to
predict performance (Schmitt et al., 2003, p. 87). Additionally,
Meinert (2015) points out despite the wide use of personality
assessments, they are the least effective in predicting
performance (Meinert, 2015). However, it is an effective tool to
use to assess for a good fit within the organization.
According to HR guide (n.d) a work sample test is
based on the belief that they are "the best predictor of future
behavior by observing behavior under similar situations" (HR
guide, n.d). For example, in a scrimmage game or tryouts
players are asked to perform their tasks and are rated based on
that performance to help coaches predict which players will be
their top performers. Through that observation, based on
simulated event, players personalities come out demonstrating
to the observer how each player interacts, reacts and responds to
the situation. There is also evidence showing high validity in
predicting job performance (Bobko, Roth, & Buster, 2005).
While work samples have a high validity and low adverse
impact, they are not cost effective because they are
administered one applicant at a time and rated by a trained
expert (Cook, 2016).
While I do like work-sample test, because of the
limitations, it would seem a personality assessment might be an
5. appropriate predictor, however, it should not be the only method
used in the selection process. When paired with other measures
such as ability and/or integrity test, predictive validity increases
(Meinert, 2015).
References
Baez, H.B. (2013). Personality tests in employment selection:
use with caution. Cornell HR Review,
http://www.cornellhrreview.org/personality-tests-in-
employment-selection-use-with-caution/
Bartram, D. (2005). The great eight competencies: A criterion-
centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 90(6), 1185–1203. Retrieved from the Walden
Library databases.
Bauer, T., & Erdogan, B. (2010). Perceptions, attitudes, and
behavior. In Organizational Behavior - Chapter 4 (1.1st. Ed.)
Flat world. http://2012books.lardbucket.org/pdfs/an-
introduction-to-organizational-behavior-v1.1.pdfBobko, P.,
Roth, P. L., & Buster, M. A. (2005). Work sample selection
tests and expected reduction in adverse impact: A cautionary
note. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(1),
1–10.Cook, M. (2016).Personnel selection: adding value
through people - a changing picture. John Wiley & Sons, 368
pages.HR guide to the Internet (n.d). Personnel Selection:
Methods: Work Sample Tests. http://www.hr-
guide.com/data/G316.htm
Meinert, D. (2015). What do personality test really reveal?
personality assessments are being used more often in the hiring
process. Are they accurate? Society for Human Resource
Management (SHRM), https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-
magazine/pages/0615-personality-tests.aspx
Schmitt, N., Cortina, J. M., Ingerick, M. J., & Wiechmann, D.
(2003). Personnel selection and employee performance. In W.
C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, R. J. Klimoski, & I. B. Weiner
(Eds.), Handbookof psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and
11. To distinguish yourself from all the other people looking for
work, you need to start with a well-written résumé. Some job
searchers are intimidated by the prospect of writing a résumé,
but a résumé is really just another specialized business message.
Follow the three-step writing process, and it will be easier than
you think:
Planning résumés. First, analyze the situation, recognizing that
the purpose of your résumé is to get an interview, not to get a
job. As you gather information, research target industries to
learn what they look for in new hires, learn about various jobs
and what to expect, and learn about the hiring managers, if
possible. In order to choose the best medium, start with a
traditional, paper résumé, then develop scannable, plain text,
HTML, and PDF versions, as needed. Choose a model of
organization that highlights your strengths and downplays your
shortcomings; use the chronological approach, unless you have
a good reason not to.
Writing résumés. Adapt to your audience by planning to catch a
recruiter’s eye within seconds. In order to do so, translate your
education and experience into attributes that employers value.
Write clearly and succinctly as you compose your message by
using language that is appropriate to the companies and
industries you are targeting; moreover, use a professional tone.
Completing résumés. After writing your first draft, revise your
résumé to make sure it is clear, concise, and correct. Next,
produce your résumé, giving it an attractive, professional
appearance. Proofread the final product for typos, spelling
errors, and other mechanical problems. Finally, distribute your
résumé following the specific instructions of each employer or
job search website.
*
14. Prentice Hall
Chapter 15 - *
Personal
Background
Personal
Objectives
Chronological
Combination
Functional
Work History
Educational Level
Skills and
Accomplishments
To focus attention on your strongest points, adapt the
appropriate organizational approach—chronological, functional,
or a combination of the two. The “right” choice depends on your
background and your goals.
In a chronological résumé, the “Work Experience” section
19. The first thing an employer needs to know is who you are and
where you can be reached: your name, address, phone number,
email address and the URL of your personal webpage, e-
portfolio or social media resume.
The brief introductory statement that follows your contact
information can take one of three forms. A career objective
identifies either a specific job you want or a general career you
want to pursue. A qualifications summary offers a brief
overview of your key qualifications. A career summary offers a
brief recap of your career, with the goal of presenting
increasing levels of responsibility and performance.
If you are still in school, education is probably your strongest
selling point. Present your educational background in depth,
choosing facts that support your “theme.” The education section
also includes off-campus training sponsored by business or
government. Education is usually given less emphasis after you
have worked in your chosen field for a year or more. Whether
you list your GPA depends on the job you want and the quality
of your grades.
The work experience section focuses on your overall theme.
When describing your work experience, highlight the
relationship between your previous responsibilities and your
target field. List your jobs in reverse chronological order, with
the current or last one first.
Describe volunteer activities that demonstrate your abilities.
List projects that required leadership, organization, teamwork,
and cooperation.
Experts advise you to leave personal interests off your résumé—
unless including them enhances the employer’s understanding of
why you would be the best candidate for the job. Also prepare a
list of references (in the same format as your résumé), as you
will be asked for them at some point.
*