Earlier this year, The Jewish Federation of Columbus, Jewish Foundation and the Wexner Foundation received results from the commissioned "2013 Portrait of Jewish Columbus." It was the first comprehensive study of Jews in central Ohio in more than a decade. As a result, a working group of professionals and lay people was created to bring recommendations to the community on how to move forward.

1. WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS
Back to TOC
November 3, 2014
1
Portrait of Jewish Columbus

2. Back to TOC
Agenda
Welcome and Overview
Arnie Good & Gordon Hecker
Youth ages 14-21
Or Mars, Jenni Goldson & Gary Rosenstein
Young Adults 22+
Erin Essak-Kopp, Ruthie Warshenbrot
Dayna Chessin & Michael Schottenstein
Baby Boomers & Seniors
David Kaplan & Amy Shevrin
Low Income Households
Ben Berger, Steve Allen & Eugenia Erlij
Homes with Children (0-13)
Jay Moses, Jenny Glick & Rachel Weiss– Berger
Final Thoughts
Arnie Good & Gordon Hecker
2
Portrait of Jewish Columbus

3. Back to TOC
The Task
Each working group is charged with answering the
following questions:
What are the one or two programs or services that…
1. …best promote engagement with the Jewish community?
2. …could benefit the most from a community-wide effort to
increase their excellence, affordability and/or capacity?
3
Portrait of Jewish Columbus

4. Portrait of Jewish Columbus
Youth ages 14-21
Recommendations
November 3, 2014
4

5. Back to TOC
Working Group Members
• Jenni Goldson Co-Chair
• Gary Rosenstein Co-Chair
• Or Mars Consultant
• Elana Polster Staff
• Jennie Cammeyer
• Micah Goldfarb
• Gary Kuhr
• Miriam Portman
• Brad Rozen
• Beth Silverstein
5

6. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
The creation of a well-funded, expertly staffed
Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative, a coordinated
and comprehensive program, that will invest in
relationship-building, leadership development
and teen engagement.
6

7. Back to TOC
Key Findings
• Portrait study
• Programs currently offered in Columbus
• Scan of Jewish Columbus
• Successful programs in other communities
7

8. Back to TOC
Portrait Study Findings
• 1,550 households have a child 14-17
• 73% of households with children 14-17 are in
Downtown/University or Bexley
• 86% of families in Bexley area state that being Jewish is very
important in their lives
• 28-44% of families living in the perimeter areas claim that being
Jewish is very important in their lives
• 1 in 3 children overall are being raised as "Jewish only"
8

9. Programs Currently Offered in Columbus
• BBYO and Movement Youth Groups
• Birthright Israel
• B’nai Tzedek Teen Philanthropy
• Friendship Circle
• High School and Middle School Jewish Outreach
• Jewish Community Center (BBYO, JET, CIT program)
• Summer Camps (Wise, Livingston, EKC, Ramah, Guci)
• OSU Hillel
• P2G Teen Trip to Israel
• Wexner Service Corps
Back to TOC
9

10. Scan of Jewish Columbus – Key Needs
• Strategy and resources for engaging teens that are not connected to any
of these programs (with a specific emphasis on teens who live in the
geographic periphery of the Jewish community)
• Strategy and resources for coordinating programs with one another for
more significant effectiveness and efficiency through collaboration
• Scholarships, grants, or alternative funding to help families afford youth
group conferences, summer camps and Israel trips
• Educational planning for deepening the Jewish content of programs
• Additional personnel for individual relationship building with teens 14-18
• A database of all Columbus Jewish teens to insure increased engagement
and to measure success.
Back to TOC
10

11. Successful Programs in Other Communities
• North Shore Teen Initiative (Boston)
• Jewish Teen Initiative (Denver)
• Teen Israel Trips Initiative (Cincinnati)
Back to TOC
11

12. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
The creation of a well-funded, expertly staffed
Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative, a coordinated
and comprehensive program, that will invest in
relationship-building, leadership development
and teen engagement by:
12

13. Focus:
• 14-18 year olds
• Build, enhance, and strengthen connection
between existing programs vs. creation of new
programs
• Informal educational experiences
Back to TOC
13
Recommendation:
Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative

14. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
• Hiring a nationally recognized full-time director
supported by an empowered advisory board
• Focusing on one-on-one relationship building by
primarily going to the teens instead of trying to bring
them to our institutions
• Incorporating appropriate levels of Jewish educational
content for teen programs
14

15. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
Increasing teen leadership development to:
• Empower and train teens to provide strong
leadership to their own programs and
organizations
• Think strategically about communal
collaboration (perhaps through a city-wide
teen council)
15

16. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
Providing a significant minimum budget for:
• Budget
– High quality Full Time Director
– Internship/Ambassadors program
– Database construction
– Teen Leadership Development
– Professional Development for Youth Group Directors
– Collaboration Grants
– Community-Wide Programs
– Administrative Costs $270,000
• Scholarships for Immersion Programs $500,000
– Israel Trips
– Summer Camps
– Youth Group Conferences
– Service Learning Trips
16

17. Back to TOC
Measuring Success
• The number of teens participating in organized
programs (based on data organized through this
initiative)
• Overall teen engagement as measured by frequency
and depth of engagement.
• Increased support for teen program staffing and
engagement of funding partners
17

18. In short we recommend a paradigm shift:
• Institution-based programming to relationship-based engagement
• Deeper investment in our current teen opportunities
• Teen leadership empowerment
• Coordination and collaboration across institutional and
denominational lines
A well-funded, coordinated effort, with an expert professional staff
and an active advisory board will insure that our teens will be active
and contributing participants in the Jewish community and live
enriched, satisfying, connected and inspired Jewish lives.
Back to TOC
Final Thoughts
18

19. Portrait of Jewish Columbus
Young Adults 22+ Working Group
Engaging People Where They
Live, Work, and Play:
A Downtown Hub and Targeted
Programming
November 3, 2014
19

20. Back to TOC
Working Group Members
• Dayna Chessin Co-Chair
• Michael Schottenstein Co-Chair
• Erin Essak Kopp Staff
• Ruthie Warshenbrot Staff
Members:
– Matthew Goldstein
– Brett Kaufman
– Sara Kreinberg
– Sara Scheinbach
20
– Lauren Sobol
– Jonathan Stone
– Ryan Vesler

21. Back to TOC
Executive Summary
What do we want to achieve?
- Continue to grow the Jewish young professional community by
providing reasons to stay, flourish and give back
Strategy
- Build a stronger connection with new programmatic initiatives and a
downtown space that becomes part of their everyday lives
Measuring Success
- 5 year goal = engage 30% of Jewish young professionals annually
- 10 year goal = engage 60% of Jewish young professionals annually
21

22. Programs Currently Offered in Columbus
Back to TOC
• ATID
• Moishe House
• High Street Synagogue (Torat Emet)
• OSU Hillel / Graduates and Young
Professionals (GAP)
• J-Connect at the Kollel
22

23. Successful Programs in Other Communities
• The Kavana Cooperative (Seattle)
‒ “Hillel for Adults”
• The Kitchen (San Francisco)
‒ “Religious startup”
• NextGen (Detroit)
‒ Model for young adult programming
‒ 15 full time staff
• Sixth & I (Washington D.C.)
‒ Cultural hub
Back to TOC
23

24. Back to TOC
Focus Group Key Facts
• Jewish 22-44 yr olds are
looking for:
– Professional development
and networking opportunities
– Substantive, content-driven
programming
– A sense of belonging…
24

25. Findings from the Portrait Study
• Approximately 3,550
Jewish young professionals
• 72% of young Jewish
households are located in
the Downtown / University
District Area
• 53% of those living
downtown said “Jewish
events are too far”
• 5% are JCC members
Back to TOC
25

26. Back to TOC
Recommendation
• Leverage the strength of the Columbus brand
– Young, intelligent, innovative, entrepreneurial, increasingly
urban and thriving economically
• Columbus needs a new brand of outreach and engagement
that reaches young professionals in their everyday lives
– Downtown Hub
– Targeted Programming
26

27. • Current programming needs to evolve to
reach the thousands of people who aren’t
currently engaged
• A downtown hub would provide an everyday
destination for Jewish young professionals
Back to TOC
Why a Downtown Hub?
27

28. Back to TOC
Downtown Hub
• A “daily use
space” and downtown
meeting spot for
young professionals
• Goal is to create
engagement and
connection around
the things that people
like and care to do
every day
28
The Place
To Be
Engage and
Connect
Potential
Services &
Amenities
• Ambassador
program for
community
outreach
• Professional
development
• Spiritual
Programming
• Philanthropic
Events
• Coffee shop
• Activity Space
⁻ Gym
⁻ Basketball courts
⁻ Yoga studio
• Restaurant / Bar
• Programming space
• Event space
• Offices for staff of
Downtown Hub and
Atid

29. Back to TOC
Targeted Programming
29
Professional
Development
Ambassador
Programs

30. Back to TOC
Ambassador Program
• Centered around one-on-one relationships
• Reach people in their day-to-day lives and
connect them to the broader Jewish community
– At work, in affinity groups and in neighborhoods
30
Manager (Staff)
Retail/Finance
Ambassador
(Volunteer)
Ambassador
(Volunteer)
Ambassador
(Volunteer)
Manager (Staff)
LGBT/Interfaith
Ambassador
(Volunteer)
Ambassador
(Volunteer)
Ambassador
(Volunteer)

31. Estimated Costs and Revenue Sources
• Programmatic = $155,000/year
• Downtown Hub = TBD
– Potential Revenue Sources
Back to TOC
• Gym memberships (est.$40+ per month/person)
• Fitness Classes
• Restaurant/Coffee Shop/Bar
• Sponsorships
• Event space
31

32. • Meet people’s needs where they live, work and play
– Provide them with the programs they want
– In the location they are
– Integrated into their everyday lives
Back to TOC
Conclusion
32

33. Portrait of Jewish Columbus
Baby Boomers & Seniors
Recommendations
November 3, 2014
33

34. Back to TOC
Working Group Members
• Amy Shevrin Co-Chair
• Ray Silverstein Co-Chair
• David Kaplan Staff
• Arlene Weiss
• Dick Sabgir
• Jessica Shimberg
• Julie Weinerman
• Keila Naparstek
• Kirk Hilbrands
• Randy Arndt
34

35. Back to TOC
Overview
- Key findings
- What works in other communities
- Recommendations
- Final thoughts
35

36. Key Findings from the Portrait Study
• Over 50% of all Jewish households are
Baby Boomers and Seniors
– Largest demographic group
– Baby Boomers (45-64) are evenly spread out
– Seniors (65+) are concentrated in the East
Back to TOC
36

37. Key Findings from the Portrait Study
Back to TOC 37

38. Programs Offered in Columbus
• Jewish engagement opportunities for
Baby Boomers & Seniors are numerous
– Synagogue programming and religious life
– Programs in Jewish organizations
– Board and volunteer opportunities
Back to TOC
38

39. Back to TOC
Working Group Insights
• Barriers to engagement:
– Not aware of current engagement opportunities
– Not feeling welcome or comfortable
participating
– No personal connection
• Jewish Values
– Tikkun Olam
– Open tent
39

40. Key Findings from Other Studies
• 70% started volunteering when asked by someone
who had a strong relationship with them (Harvard
Public Health study, 2012)
• Baby Boomer volunteering is expected to grow by
50% during the current decade (U.S. Census, 2010)
• Individuals volunteer most frequently for
organizations with religious affiliation (Bureau of
Labor Statistics)
Back to TOC
40

41. How Other Communities Successfully Engage
• Baltimore, Jewish Volunteer Connection- Create
“Volun-teams” through a centralized office
• Portland, Tivnu - Builds homes (habitat for
humanity), with Jewish learning and leadership
development components
• Israel, Eschel Project- Seniors are trained to turn
hobbies into micro-businesses
Back to TOC
41

42. Recommendation #1: J-Link Columbus
• What:
– Connect community members to Jewish engagement
opportunities
– Consists of existing programming and volunteering
– Combination of outreach professionals and centralized data
– Initiative housed in Federation
• How:
– 4 outreach professionals with geographic responsibilities
– Connecting one-on-one with community members
– Guiding individuals to best serve their interests
• Measurements:
– Participation, both hours & dollars
• Costs:
– $300,000 - $400,000 per year 42
Back to TOC

43. Recommendation #2: Columbus Service Corp
• What:
– Volunteer groups comprised of Baby Boomers and Seniors
– Service, social, learning, and leadership elements
– Inspired by Wexner Service Corp
• How:
– Professional staff develop curriculum and volunteer
opportunities
– Connect service corp members to leadership positions
• Measurements:
– Participation, both hours & dollars
• Costs:
– $100,000 - $150,000 per year
– Personnel, curriculum development, operating costs 43
Back to TOC

44. Portrait of Jewish Columbus
Low Income Jewish Households
Working Group
Recommendations
November 3, 2014
44

45. Back to TOC
Working Group
Dr. Steven Allen Co-Chair, Nationwide Children’s
Eugenia Erlij Co-Chair, Solenis
Rabbi Benjamin Berger Consultant, The Wexner Foundation
Elana Polster Staff, The Columbus Jewish Federation
Dan Finkelman Consultant
Bobbie Garber Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority
Alisa Isaac Community Volunteer
Amy Klaben Homeport
Laurie Stein Marsh Leadership Columbus
Jennifer Marshall Formerly JFS, Goodwill
Margie Pizzuti Goodwill
45
The working group met on five occasions between May and October.

46. Back to TOC
Primary Efforts
46
• Reviewed JPAR results and reassessed low income figures
• Interviewed local synagogues, day schools and agencies
• Reviewed report on poverty and programs offered by social service
agencies in Columbus

47. Key Findings from the Portrait Study
Back to TOC
JEWISH POVERTY IS A REAL ISSUE
• Number of Jews in poverty* is difficult to ascertain
− Best estimate of Jewish poverty rate in Columbus is ~16%, but data
is lacking
• 14% of respondents from households in poverty stated that
being Jewish is “very important” to their life
• 1 in 5 households report costs prevent affiliation
47
* Poor = annual income <150% Federal Poverty Level (FPL)
− Up to $35,325 for a family of 4

48. Back to TOC
Working Group Findings
JEWISH POVERTY IN COLUMBUS
NOT WELL UNDERSTOOD
• Minimal cross communication and collaboration amongst agencies
• Leaders have difficulty identifying needs though high cost of affiliation
and living are clear challenges
• Shame and stigma are barriers to self-identification and affiliation
• Impoverished Jews are much more likely to be disaffiliated
• Columbus is not alone
48

49. Back to TOC
Working Group Findings
49
AT RISK SEGMENTS OF THE POPULATION
• 240 survivors of Nazi
persecution (100+ on
Medicaid)
• 30-64 year-olds
including “working
poor”
Respondent Age from Poor Jewish
18-29,
18%
30-44,
30%
45-64,
44%
Households
65+, 8%

50. Back to TOC
Working Group Findings
EXISTING SERVICES IN
COLUMBUS JEWISH COMMUNITY
• JFS and WHV are the primary service providers in the Jewish
community ( Lack of data on what other community services
families are utilizing.)
• All organizations including synagogues have touch points with
poverty
• Discretionary funds distributed for incidental and Jewish life
needs throughout organizations
• Scrip gift certificates are main sources of monetary support
($119k distributed since 2005)
50

51. • Equip Jewish professionals (rabbis, synagogue and school administrators,
Back to TOC
Recommendation #1
DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE
EDUCATION AND OUTREACH EFFORT
51
agency leaders) with tools to respond and support Jews experiencing
poverty
• Support community in identifying households in poverty in order to
provide services more effectively
• Help reduce the emotional toll of poverty
• Increase community awareness of Jewish poverty
• Reduce misinformation and common dismissiveness
• Reduce shame and stigma associated with poverty

52. Back to TOC
• Number of participants in
training
• Number of synagogues
participating in Shabbat on
poverty
• Number of public events where
“poverty” is on the agenda
• Number of Jews accessing
services provided by Jewish
community and broader
Columbus social services
52
Recommendation #1
Awareness, Outreach, and Education Campaign
KEY ACTIVITIES
• Provide training for rabbis and
other professionals on the range of
community services
• Coordinate annual Shabbat on
poverty
• Create community summit on
Jewish poverty
• Develop “speakers bureau” – first
hand accounts to be shared in
public events
• Provide educational materials at
public points
SUCCESS MEASURES

53. Back to TOC
Recommendation #2
53
INCREASE ACCESS TO RESOURCES PROVIDED BY JEWISH
COMMUNITY
• Decrease barriers to inclusion
• Serve as liaison to help negotiate reduced fees and additional support
from Jewish organizations
• Increase knowledge of and access to current support services
• Rapid response to emergency situations (e.g. Bonei Mishpochot,
increased visibility)
• Reduce burden of organizations & synagogues to support financial needs
of constituents

54. Back to TOC
Recommendation #2
Inclusion Gateway
SUCCESS MEASURES
• Annual $ in fund
• Annual $ distributed to households
in need
• Number of households
coordinated across
agencies/synagogues
• Affiliation statistics amongst low
income Jewish population in future
surveys
• Database about low income
population
54
KEY ACTIVITIES
• Provide single contact for those
seeking help to cover expenses
related to Jewish living
• Create fund that can be used to
supplement cost of Jewish living
• Create fund that can respond to
emergency need in response to
catastrophic event
• Provide access/referral to further
community-based job support and
counseling services

55. Back to TOC
Recommendation #3
55
SUPPORT CREATION OF SURVIVORS OF NAZI
PERSECUTION FUND
• Close gap between needs and government funding
− Reduction in Federal Food Assistance Program and Public
Medicaid funds (PASSPORT)
• Address unique aging needs
− Importance of in-home care vs. institutional settings
− High percentage of Russian speakers
− Need for specialized training for caregivers (e.g. short-term
memory loss leaves individual with memory of trauma)

56. Back to TOC
Recommendation #3
Survivors of Nazi Persecution Fund
SUCCESS MEASURES
• $ raised in fund
• Number of survivors helped
56
KEY ACTIVITIES
• Leverage the match and generosity
of Wexner Family matching gift
• Increase profile of fund
• Publicize the existing reality
• Develop case studies/profiles for
publication

57. Recommendation #1
OUTREACH & EDUCATION
Recommendation #2
INCLUSION GATEWAY
Back to TOC
Summary
57
Recommendation #3
SURVIVOR FUND
• Identify existing leader (s) to champion message
(e.g.JCC, WHV, JFS)
• Professional with background in education,
counseling/social work and poverty
• ~$20 -50k annual programming costs
• Strengthen existing programs
• Can be considered in combination with
recommendation #1
• ~$250K (PTE and/or FTE, programming, fund
development)
• $1.5 MM for fund

58. Portrait of Jewish Columbus
Homes with Children 0-13 Working Group
Recommendations
November 3, 2014
58

59. Back to TOC
Working Group Members
59
Rachel Weiss-Berger
Co-chair
Jenny Glick
Co-chair
Rabbi Jay Moses
Staff
Elana Polster
Staff
Lara Blumberg Ilissa Eiferman Matthew Freedman Sara Saldoff
Jeremy Cohen (resigned – illness)

60. Back to TOC
Meetings and Activities
The working group met six times between April and October.
The group completed the following key tasks:
• Review of data
• Conducted local research
• Conducted national research
• Brainstormed, developed, and refined recommendations in
this report.
60

61. 61
Three Key Findings from POJC
50%
Percentage of
children living
In Jewish
households
with NO Jewish
education
Jewish households with
children are evenly
distributed across the 4
areas of residence in
Columbus
30%
Percentage of
children in
Jewish
household
attending
overnight
camp
Prepared by KJ Steinman, based on analyses provided by JPAR. Please contact authors for technical details. 61

62. Why Experiential Education?
Back to TOC
62
21%
As adults,
campers are more
likely to feel that
being Jewish is
very important.
(Cohen et al, 2011)
Attending Jewish overnight
camp leads to practicing
Judaism as adults.
(Pew, 2013)

63. Back to TOC
The Need
0-4
5-7
8-13 ??
63

64. Recommendation: JCamp Columbus
Concept:
JCamp Columbus will increase the impact of the
“magic” of Jewish overnight summer camping
• Summer camp spirit year round!
• More Campers
• Affordability
Back to TOC
64

65. Recommendation: JCamp Columbus
Examples of JCamp Columbus in action:
• Events bringing the spirit of camp into the
community.
• Collaboration: join forces to spread the message of
the importance of camp.
• Re-imagined camp fair
• In-home gatherings of camp families: educational,
social, and fun
• Scholarships and incentive coupons
Back to TOC
65

66. 6 Overnight Camps Serve Columbus
GUCI Ramah Stone
Livingston Emma Kaufmann Wise
Collectively, these camps served
approximately 200 children in 2014. 66
Back to TOC

67. Successful National Programs
• Foundation for Jewish Camp: One Happy
Camper, Bunk Connect
• Harold Grinspoon Foundation: JCamp 180
• Pearlstone Retreat Center, Baltimore
Back to TOC
67

68. Recommendation: JCamp Columbus
Range of Costs:
$55k staff resources (part-time) and
programming budget for local programs
$250k incentive/scholarships
Back to TOC
68

69. Recommendation: JCamp Columbus
Measuring Success:
• Increase in number of children who attend
Jewish summer camps – Double within 5-7
years
• Improved collaborative relationships between
camps, synagogues, and agencies.
• Palpable increase in the “camp spirit” in
Columbus Jewish life: warmth, singing,
creativity, experiential learning.
Back to TOC
69

70. Back to TOC
The Need
To engage the multi-generational family – not just children
Create a local “crown jewel” of Columbus
70

71. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Hoover Family Center
Concept:
For many years, the Columbus JCC has used Camp Hoover as a day
camp facility for local fourth through eighth graders. The facility is well-utilized
now, but there is the potential for it to be so much more.
Fast forward three to five years. Imagine the Hoover Family Center—
the result of strong collaboration, planning and fundraising between
The Wexner Foundation, the Jewish Federation of Columbus, and the
Columbus JCC.
The Hoover Family Center is a centrally located pluralistic retreat that
will engage Jewish families across Columbus by offering meaningful
family-oriented programming with minimal barriers to participation.
The community facility will allow Jews to connect with one another
while also fostering new opportunities for experiential Judaism.
71

72. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Hoover Family Center
Concept:
The immediate focus for programming will be on a multi-generational
family camp that will serve as an opportunity for children to
experience Jewish overnight camp at a younger age.
Experiential Judaism at the Hoover Family Center is not limited to the
summer months. The center’s Kosher kitchen will adjoin a conference
center and social hall to allow for year-round retreats and gatherings.
The center will be open to all local Jewish agencies and will serve as a
destination for national Jewish scholars.
While the primary mission of the Hoover Family Center is to engage
local Jewish families with young children, the one-of-a-kind multi-purpose
facility will be home to a multitude of programming.
72

73. Back to TOC
Hoover Family Center:
Possible Programs
opportunities for young adults,
73
Family camp programs including
Bubbie Zaydie weekend retreats.
Experiential learning
families, synagogues and
organizations
Expanded JCC day
camp offerings
Revenue from corporate or
broader community groups
beyond Jewish community

74. Back to TOC
Hoover Family Center:
Possible Programs
Life cycle events Environmental,
farming, and
outdoor
programming
Regional hub

75. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Hoover Family Center
Rationale / “The Why?”:
• This process requested bold and visionary
thinking. This is a “big idea” worthy of the charge
we were given.
• Underutilized property
• Centrally located – serving all of Columbus
• There is no Jewish retreat center in Ohio.
• Easy entry point to Jewish overnight camp.
• Create a shared collaborative space
• Bringing the spirit of Jewish summer camping to
all ages at all seasons of the year.
75

76. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Hoover Family Camp
Range of Costs:
• Feasibility study required
• Major capital improvements and facility
enhancements would be necessary
76

77. Back to TOC
Recommendation:
Hoover Family Center
Measuring Success:
• Use current POJC study as a benchmark
• Track alumni of the different programs at the Hoover
Family Center. Where/how do they engage? Youth
groups, overnight camps, day schools, Synagogues, etc.
• Have Jewish relationships formed that might not have
otherwise existed?
• Is there an increase in
1. Regional organizations that utilize the facility?
2. Amount of annual revenue—year over year?
3. Quantity and quality of programs hosted by agencies?
4. Quantity of private events?
77