responding to EACH draft from the other group members by Saturday .docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•2 views

responding to EACH draft from the other group members by Saturday one page of responding for each draft total 3 pages = $15 -------------------------------------------- Element Format: Is the formatting of the memo correct (heading, spacing, margins, font)? Format: Is the formatting of the memo correct (use of highlighting techniques, tables/graphs/charts, effective white space)? Substance: Does the memo incorporate thorough research and contain sufficient concrete details to be credible and easily understood? Substance: Does the memo appear innovative and effectively present solution(s) that represent originality in thought? Rhetorical strategies: Is the tone and vocabulary appropriate for the audience? Rhetorical strategies: Has the writer made a good case for why this issue is important, and to whom? Cohesion: Does each paragraph have only one main idea? Does each sentence connect to the next? Mechanics: Is the memo free of spelling, mechanical, usage, punctuation, and grammar errors? Research: Is the research thorough, effectively used and presented, and accurately supports ideas? Research: Is the sources list correctly formatted? Do the sources appear credible? .

Cohesion:
Does each paragraph have only one main idea? Does each
sentence connect to the next?
Mechanics:
Is the memo free of spelling, mechanical, usage, punctuation,
and grammar errors?
Research:
Is the research thorough, effectively used and presented, and
accurately supports ideas?
Research:
Is the sources list correctly formatted? Do the sources appear
credible?

Element Format: Is the formatting of the memo correct (heading, spacing, margins, font)? Format: Is the formatting of the memo correct (use of highlighting techniques, tables/graphs/charts, effective white space)? Substance: Does the memo incorporate thorough research and contain sufficient concrete details to be credible and easily understood? Substance: Does the memo appear innovative and effectively present solution(s) that represent originality in thought? Rhetorical strategies: Is the tone and vocabulary appropriate for the audience? Rhetorical strategies: Has the writer made a good case for why this issue is important, and to whom? Cohesion: Does each paragraph have only one main idea? Does each sentence connect to the next? Mechanics: Is the memo free of spelling, mechanical, usage, punctuation, and grammar errors? Research: Is the research thorough, effectively used and presented, and accurately supports ideas? Research: Is the sources list correctly formatted? Do the sources appear credible? .

1Week 5Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated B.docx

felicidaddinwoodie

1 Week 5:Critiquing Research Articles to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography As mentioned, one component of becoming an independent scholar is learning how to provide an evaluative critique of the work of other scholars. A critique of scholarly work requires your ability to use high level critical thinking skills. In addition, you must be able to write constructively and communicate your ideas well with clear and focused writing. The purpose of this assignment is two-fold. First, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly and precisely summarize and critically evaluate specific information from peer-reviewed resources. Secondly, you are to demonstrate your ability to clearly present that evaluative information in writing that meets academic and professional expectations. These skills will be invaluable as you go on to develop your literature review and in your journey to become an independent scholar. The result of this activity is produce annotated bibliographies based on the two peer-reviewed journal articles related to your chosen topic (you are welcome to include more articles for practice and feedback). Use the sections and questions below to help you critique each article. You do not need to answer every single question as some questions might not apply. The questions are listed as a means to help you generate ideas as you work on critiquing each article. You might also consider using this template in the future when critically analyzing articles. Please REMOVE the instructions and questions listed below for your paper and submit an annotated bibliography for each article. Link to peer reviewed article one: http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/6/341 1) APA reference for article #1 2)Introductionand core study elements · Give an overview of the purpose of the study and the problem or issue discussed. · Consider whether the problem is clearly described. Did the author(s) document and support the existence of the problem with scholarly sources and data? Were the sources credible and relevant (as defined by the readings you’ve done for this course)? · What were the research questions? · What were the key findings and conclusions of the study? 3) Evaluate literature reviewed · Examine the literature reviewed by the author(s). How relevant is the) cited literature? Do certain ideas or concepts appear to be over/underemphasized? Was there any bias in language or tone of the writing? What discussions need elaboration or could be more concise? What is missing? 4) Evaluate theoretical framework · What theoretical or conceptual framework was used as the basis for the study? What are the key variables and from which theories do they originate? Are variables well-defined? What alternative theories might support this study? 5) Evaluate methods · What research method and designs are used in this study? · How well are the methods described (could a reader duplicate the research process if needed)? · Do the m ...

A checklist for reviewing a paper

Mohammed Esawie

This document provides an illustrative guide for reviewing or writing a scientific manuscript. It outlines key screening questions and points to consider when evaluating different sections of a manuscript, including the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, figures/tables, discussion, citations, and overall structure. The goal is to determine if the manuscript presents novel, original research that is important to its field and properly formatted according to journal guidelines. Sections are evaluated for clarity, coherence, appropriate length, proper syntax, and adherence to reporting standards. The reviewer is advised to provide specific, constructive criticism in a good tone when determining the manuscript's suitability for publication.

Transcript Graduate student association Interview with preside.docx

edwardmarivel

Transcript Graduate student association Interview with president of Graduate student association M. Abdullah Alghafes 1) What are the shared goals of the community? Why does this group exist? What does it do? · Focusing on graduate students · Help them with their academic life · Offered the graduate students the academic assistant · Make an activities for the graduate students like · Help the graduate students to get a scholarship from the university 2) What mechanisms do members use to communicate with each other (meetings, phone calls, email, text messages, newsletters, reports, evaluation forms, etc.)? -They are using 1- email 2- Face book 3- Twitter 4- cellphones (only emergence calls) 3) What are the purposes of each of these mechanisms of communication (i.e to improve performance, make money, grow better roses, share research, etc.)? · They are using these mechanisms of communication because they believe that it will be easier for members to communicate with each other 4) Which of the above mechanisms of communication can be considered genres (textual responses to recurring situations that all group members recognize and understand)? · Emails, because if they have any problem they can go back and check the emails between the members 5) What kinds of specialized language (lexis) do group members use in their conversation and in their genres (name some examples—ESL, on the fly, 86, etc.)? What communicative function does this lexis serve (i.e. why say “86” instead of “we are out of this”?)? -board = executive board of the club - Officer = the meeting between the members and the club advisor -they have members using different languages like Arabic, French, Spanish,… to communicate with members because it’s an international club. 6) Who are “old-timers” with expertise? Who are the newcomers with less expertise? How do newcomers learn the appropriate language, genres, and knowledge of the group? · The old members always trying to help the new members by teaching them the work rolls, tech them the specialized language, and keep them on the track. 2 RAAB Discourse Community Ethnography (DCE) Assignment Goals for this assignment: 1. Learn and use tools for analyzing a discourse community’s practices 2. Begin to understand empirical research (develop an understanding through observation/experimentation) 3. Practice writing about primary research The Task: · Choose a discourse community that has impacted you or interests you and find a preliminary answer to this research question: “What are the goals and characteristics of this discourse community?” Also, conclusion effectively answers the research question “Is X a discourse community?” · The group or organization you choose may be one that is related to your major or your field of interest. You will need my approval if you wish to persuade me to accep ...

I would like it in APA format thanks assignment listed belowype.docx

jewisonantone

I would like it in APA format thanks assignment listed below: ype: Discussion Board Unit: Culture and the Individual Experience Due Date: Sun, 4/24/16 Grading Type: Numeric Points Possible: 75 Points Earned: 0 Deliverable Length: 3-4 paragraphs View objectives for this assignment Go To: Assignment Details Learning Materials Reading Assignment My Work: Online Deliverables: Discussion Board Looking for tutoring? Go to Smarthinking Collapse All | Expand All Assignment Details Assignment Description The Discussion Board (DB) is part of the core of online learning. Classroom discussion in an online environment requires the active participation of students and the instructor to create robust interaction and dialogue. Every student is expected to create an original response to the open-ended DB question as well as engage in dialogue by responding to posts created by others throughout the week. At the end of each unit, DB participation will be assessed based on both level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion. At a minimum, each student will be expected to post an original and thoughtful response to the DB question and contribute to the weekly dialogue by responding to at least two other posts from students. The first contribution must be posted before midnight (Central Time) on Wednesday of each week. Two additional responses are required after Wednesday of each week. Students are highly encouraged to engage on the Discussion Board early and often, as that is the primary way the university tracks class attendance and participation. The purpose of the Discussion Board is to allow students to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content and the DB question. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB will be accepted after the end of each unit. Focus your discussion on the following: How confident are you that companies today take culture into proper account and balance along with other aspects of productivity? Why? What specific instances can you cite from experience and from academic literature? Be sure to include APA-formatted references in your response. What can an individual do in any of these areas (music, literature, art, theater, education, or religion) to sustain and grow a healthy and useful culture? What reasons do you have for doing anything? What is the role of the individual versus the role of government in sustaining and building a healthy and robust culture through the humanities? What should be the individual’s role in his or her own community and country, and what should the role be in regions outside of the home country? What is the role of educational institutions in shaping and encouraging specific cultural and humanities concepts alongside the emphasis on knowledge and facts? Which areas of the humanities should be emphasized? Why? For assistance with your assignment, please use your text,.

Discussion Rubric Graduate Your active participation i.docx

petehbailey729071

Discussion Rubric: Graduate Your active participation in the discussion forums is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions are designed to help you make meaningful connections between the course content and the larger concepts and goals of the course. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance. Requirements for Discussion Board Assignments Students are required to post one initial post and to follow up with at least two response posts for each discussion board assignment. For your initial post (1), you must do the following:  Compose a post of one to two paragraphs.  In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.  In Modules Two through Ten, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Take into consideration material such as course content and other discussion boards from the current module and previous modules, when appropriate.  Reference scholarly or peer-reviewed sources to support your discussion points, as appropriate (using proper citation methods for your discipline). For your response posts (2), you must do the following:  Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial post thread.  In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.  In Modules Two through Ten, complete the response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion prompt. Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value Comprehension Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using appropriate detail (90%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (70%) Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) 20 Timeliness Submits initial post on time (100%) Submits initial post one day late (70%) Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) 10 Engagement Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (90%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (70%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0%) 20 Critical Thinking Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples (100%) Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence (90%) Draws logical conclusions (70%) Does not draw logic.

Essay report on field observations (1)

reflections2012

The document provides instructions for a reflection report on a 15-hour field observation experience in an educational setting. Students are asked to write a 2-3 page double-spaced essay divided into 5 paragraphs, with each paragraph responding to a question about diversity and inclusion. The questions address observations of classroom demographics and inclusion strategies; tools for English learners and learning communities; religious pluralism; developmentally appropriate classrooms; and beliefs about all students' ability to learn. Students must cite examples from the provided chapters and suggest inclusive software or websites for their future classrooms.

Extra Credit-TED TalksOutline Revisions 40 Points PossiblePlea.docx

mecklenburgstrelitzh

Extra Credit-TED Talks/Outline Revisions: 40 Points Possible Please note that excessive grammatical errors and missing components will receive No Credit !!!! This is due on the last day of speeches. Speech Analysis: Search the TED Talk Website and search for a presentation (10 minutes or longer) that interests you. Then write a 2-3 page, double spaced, report that includes terms and techniques we discussed in class and how the speaker uses them (ex. attention getter, research, patterns of speech organization, body language, etc.). Also, copy and paste the link on the paper. Send both an electric and hard copy to receive credit. Summarize the discussion topic (limit this to one paragraph) Was the speech informative or persuasive? How did you know? What language did the speaker use? How did the speaker gain your attention? What techniques are used? How was the speech delivered? What techniques did the speaker use? Were there any insightful or impactful messages? Does the speaker use additional research, personal experience, or both as support? How? Did the speaker use a speech organization pattern like we discussed in class? Did the speaker have an impactful ending? How did the speaker conclude the talk? .

This document discusses text media and information design. It defines text as a format for presenting ideas in written, printed or digital form, which can come from formal or informal sources. Text media disseminates information through various publications and platforms using design elements like emphasis, proximity, alignment and organization to effectively convey messages. These elements create visual interest and consistency through techniques like repetition and contrast. The document also discusses how consumers and producers of content should approach and create text media through frameworks that consider the audience, purpose and format. Finally, it explores typography and different typefaces that can be used to express meaning and emotion in digital text.

Assignment DetailsThis assignment has 4 parts.1. What compe.docx

faithxdunce63732

Assignment Details: This assignment has 4 parts. 1. What competencies were you able to develop in researching and writing the course Comprehensive Project? How did you leverage knowledge gained in the intellipath assignments (Units 1- 4) in completing the Comprehensive Project? How will these competencies and knowledge support your career advancement in management? 2. Marketers must consider the strategic implications of buyer behavior, market segmentation, product positioning, pricing, distribution, advertising management, and customer relationship management. Analyze how your strategic marketing plan fits with your mission statement and goals and what type of target audience would your pricing objectives likely to positively affect. 3. Detail how you will use customer relationship management to ensure loyalty to your product and the brand. 4. What role does technology play in supporting your customer relationship management plan? Deliverable Length: 400 words (minimum) Exceptional (5) Excellent (4) Good (3) Poor (2) Unacceptable (1) Expression, style, and structure Exceptional introduction that grabs interest of reader and provides a well established, clear, and concise statement of purpose. Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough development of thesis with excellent transitions between and within sections. Conclusion provides an exceptional summary of the topic with concluding ideas that impact the reader and introduces no new information. The style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Excellent introduction that is interesting and states the research topic. Thesis is clear and an arguable statement of position. The paper is written in a clear and logical order that supports thesis with excellent transitions between and within sections. The conclusion provides an excellent summary of the topic with clear concluding ideas and introduces no new information. The style and voice are appropriate for the audience and the purpose of the paper. Good introduction that is interesting and states the purpose of the research topic. The thesis is for the most part clear and provides an arguable statement of position. The paper is written in a clear and logical order that supports thesis with good transitions between and within sections. The conclusion provides a good summary of topic with clear concluding ideas while introducing no new information. The overall style and voice are appropriate for the audience and the purpose of the paper. Basic introduction that states the topic but lacks interest. Thesis is somewhat clear and arguable. Somewhat clear and logical development with basic transitions between and within sections. Conclusion provides a basic summary of topic with some final concluding ideas. The conclusion introduces new information and/or is lacking clarity. .

A2 media studies powerpoint essay layout 1b

pattimcd

This document provides guidance for students on planning essay responses for a media studies exam. It recommends choosing a question that can be more fully understood and supported with strong evidence. Students should plan for up to 10 minutes to help structure their ideas in a clear, logical order. Effective planning techniques include brainstorming, diagrams, and bullet points. A successful plan will address the exam criteria and include context, examples, theories, and links between ideas. Students are given sample questions to practice planning an essay response within the time limits.

Review of two articles you have read in the Wall Street Journal ”W.docx

healdkathaleen

This document provides instructions for writing a cultural immersion paper. Students are asked to reflect on their experiences immersing themselves in another culture and how their preconceived ideas about that culture may have changed. They should discuss how they would apply what they learned to counseling clients from that culture. The paper should be 10 pages long and address several CACREP standards and components related to multicultural competence. Guidelines are provided to evaluate papers based on introduction/thesis, focus, idea development, conclusion, organization, tone, writing mechanics, and APA style.

Planning an A2 Media Studies answer

Andy Wallis

This document provides guidance on planning essay responses for media exams. It advises students to [1] carefully choose the essay question that they can best answer and support with evidence, [2] take 10 minutes to plan their response to generate and organize ideas, and [3] structure their plan around the exam criteria, including context, examples, theories, and linking different points. Sample planning processes are outlined, and students are given time to practice planning a response with peer feedback.

Needs analysis In ESP

Karakorum International University

EED 364 Due Date Mar 11, 2017Science LessonObserve a scien.docx

LinaCovington707

EED 364 Due Date: Mar 11, 2017 Science Lesson Observe a science lesson being taught in the classroom. Write a 250-500 word reflection based on your observation that addresses the following questions. 1. Did the science teacher integrate other content areas into the science lesson, such as reading, writing, math, and technology? 2. Did the teacher incorporate technology into the lesson? 3. What supplies/handouts, if any, did the teacher use? 4. Were science standards used? 5. What types of assessments were used by the teacher? 6. Was differentiated instruction evident? 7. Was this lesson successful? If so, what made it successful? 8. Would you try this approach in the future once you are in the classroom or in control of the lesson creation? Why or why not? 9. How would you make this lesson more successful/engaging? Prepare this assignment according to the APA EED 364 Due Date: Mar 11, 2017 Details: Design a PowerPoint presentation demonstrating five different technology resources that can be used to enhance science and math instruction. These could be apps, computer programs, videos, websites, etc. In a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presentation, include the following: A detailed description of each technology and how it works An explanation of how technology components align to standards. Completed Technology Presentation form for each technology Please follow the following rubric Technology Resources Descriptions of each technology, how it works, and how components align to standards are thoroughly explained and insightful. Technology form is complete for each technology. Presentation of Content The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. Layout The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. Thesis Development and Purpose The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English. Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) In-text citations and a reference page are complete an.

1 RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing RESEA

MartineMccracken314

1 RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing RESEARCH PROPOSAL - PART 1: INTRODUCTION, REVIEW OF LITERATURE, PROBLEM STATEMENT, RESEARCH QUESTIONS Due at the end of week 7 (Sunday February 28, 2021 at midnight) You need to conduct some research related to your own interests or to serve the interests of some organization (employer/client/sponsor). Before you start writing a formal proposal, you (or your employer/client/sponsor) would like to gather some information about the problem as well as understand its importance. Choose your research topic thoughtfully and submit the topic of your research proposal for approval the latest by the end of Week 3 (Sunday January 31, 2021 at midnight). You can find the submission box in Week 3. This part of your research proposal should be roughly 7-9 pages (excluding cover page, references and annex) and written in paragraphs, report format. All citations and references for this course are to be done in the APA style. HERE ARE THE KEY PARTS OF THIS PART OF THE PROPOSAL (PART 1): Title of your research Make it intriguing – (BUT LESS THAN 120 CHARACTERS) Introduction/Background Provide a brief description of what the proposed research topic is about, why is it important and how you came to be interested in it. Literature Review The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills in finding and analyzing valid literary resources for your research. The review should be written in an integral / synthetic style, and NOT as an annotated bibliography. Please note: Use in-text citations to reference all ideas, concepts, text, and data that are not your own. If you make a statement, back it up with a reference! • Research a minimum of 15 relevant business-related literature sources (focus on material available in digital format only for this course). Carefully choose your 15 "keepers" that are clearly related to your study. (Note: you might need to find 30 to “keep” only 15). • Identify major common themes encountered in the selected literature sources. For each theme, create its own subsection within the literature review. • For each theme / subsection of the literature review, explain the opinions of the authors and show their similarities, differences, methods of acquisition of data, methods of data analysis and other pertinent information. State how the reviewed research results relate to your proposed study. • Identify the gaps in the literature and explain what needs to be done to move forward in your research. Statement of the Problem Detail the problem that you are considering. Explain: • How are you defining and delimiting the specific area of the research? • What is the gap that will be addressed by this research? • What it is that you hope to learn by conducting this research? • Discuss the anticipated outcomes and benefits to the researcher, the organization, or society. Research Questions Provide focused ...

1 RSCH 600 Research Proposal writing RESEA

AbbyWhyte974

xCulture – Cross-cultural UX Elements: Research Method and Design Guidelines

Jan Brejcha

Thanks to the intensification of globalization through communication technology, we are faced more and more with UIs coming from different cultural backgrounds. In order to fit the user’s cultural expectations as closely as possible, designers need to combine usability knowledge with cultural insights. By defining a usable set of UI design guidelines for a target culture, designers could market their products with lower costs than with cross-cultural testing. To promote this line of research, we carried a pilot study targeted at the habits, mental models and UI preferences of Chinese and Czech users. Our findings show there is a strong influence of globalization on the cultural markers mainly through the use of common software platforms. However, we found many important culture-specific differences as well in both groups. We present our results as guidelines that could be used to enhance the user’s acceptance of the UI in a specific culture.

Critique

Jehan Farrag

1) The document provides guidelines for critiquing a research study, outlining important aspects that should be evaluated such as the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. 2) Key areas that are assessed include whether the problem and objectives are clearly defined, the sampling and data collection methods are appropriate, the data is analyzed correctly, and the conclusions are supported by the results. 3) A successful critique answers questions about each component of the study and evaluates whether the report achieves the purpose of research through rigorous methodology and meaningful findings.

Rubric Writing Assignment Rubric Criteria Level 3 Level.docx

toddr4

Rubric: Writing Assignment Rubric Criteria Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion 1 - Topic selection & approval (20 pts) Proposed topic submitted on time and covered one of the assigned issues: description of a current issue, its solution, its economic implications, or impact on ecosystems. (20-18 pts) Proposed topic submitted on time but weak coverage of the assigned issues: description of a current issue, its solution, its economic implications, or impact on ecosystems. (17-14 pts) Proposed topic submitted late and/or and weak coverage of the assigned issues: description of a current issue, its solution, its economic implications, or impact on ecosystems. (13-0 pts) Criterion 2 - Scientific Content and Synthesis (100 pts) Facts, organization, and conclusions follow a clear, logical sequence that supports the thesis statement. Citations of scholarly references support scientific content. Accurate scientific information. No text has been copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Outstanding treatment of applicable course outcome. (100-90 pts) Nearly all directions followed. Although the writing is essentially well organized, the audience analysis, the statement of purpose, or the handling of the content is flawed. Occasional vague wording hinders precise communication. Contains one to two science content errors. One to two statements (or significant phrases) have been copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Superior treatment of applicable course outcome. (89-70 pts) Unsatisfactory or incorrect content. Many content errors; content is largely unsupported generalities. Points are inadequately developed; few specifics. Poorly organized; difficult to follow. Substantial text (e.g., more than six statements or significant phrases) has been copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Significant overdependence on one to two references. Did not satisfy applicable course outcome. (69-0 pts) Criterion 3 - Scholarly APA References (40 pts) All references were in APA-style and were properly cited using in-text and reference listings. Used 6 or more references. Many different, reputable types of references are used (e.g., textbook, scientific articles, encyclopedia, reputable Internet sources). (40-36 pts) Most references were in APA-style and were properly cited using in-text and reference listings. Used 3-5 references. Many different, reputable types of references are used (e.g., textbook, scientific articles, encyclopedia, reputable Internet sources). (35-25 pts) Improper use of APA-style and/or in-text citations. Used 3 or fewer references and/or consulted unreliable resources (blogs, Wikipedia, etc.). (24-0 pts) Criterion 4 - Effective Writing (30 pts) No writing or grammatical errors. Words are chosen and sentences are constructed to make the information u.

Analyzing Multimodal Design-Presentation handout

Susan Rauch, PhD

This document provides guidance on analyzing design choices for reader-centered documents in the workplace. It discusses five key concepts to consider: emphasis, contrast, balance/organization, alignment, and proximity. When analyzing a design, one should note elements emphasized, organization of elements, use of contrast to create feeling, alignment to guide the eye, and proximity of elements. Understanding design choices helps meet the demands of the rhetorical situation.

Review the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) Code .docx

responding to EACH draft from the other group members by Saturday .docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to responding to EACH draft from the other group members by Saturday .docx

Similar to responding to EACH draft from the other group members by Saturday .docx (13)

More from daynamckernon

More from daynamckernon (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

responding to EACH draft from the other group members by Saturday .docx