Euthanasia Against Essay

Essay about Anti Euthanasia
If someone is terminally ill, should a doctor be allowed, with consent from the patient and their
family, to give the person an overdose in order to end the person's life?
Being sick and weak has driven people to wish they were dead. People like to be strong and
powerful and able, and many cannot cope with reality once they lose the abilities they once had.
They become helpless and fragile and it is embarrassing for them to have others see them that way.
Some medical patients loose the drive to live. Certain doctors, such as Dr. Jack Kevorkian (who
helped approximately 130 people with 'physician–assisted suicide'), see the anguish this causes them,
and have interceded to help them achieve death by giving the patients overdoses of...show more
content...
It is hard to refuse a person death when all they see is suffering, but that doctor could be struck with
the knowledge that a person's life was in his hands, and he threw it away with one injection.
Physician–assisted suicide puts a humongous responsibility on doctors. If and when doctors are
given this responsibility–to advise families when their loved ones are beyond help, and to play the
deadly hand–it is putting a lot of power into their hands. They could be mistaken, and a wrong
diagnosis could lead to the murder of a savable person. Or, worse than that, they could tell the
family that all hope is loss because of a lack of time, staff, or resources, and the doctor may be too
proud to admit it, or he/she may think that it is a waste to invest in the elderly. They may always
state that the patient is going to die from their affliction and suggest euthanasia in order to save
their hospital the trouble of housing the sickly. Along with the patient being possibly savable,
doctors and family may give up on hope too soon. If a patient is told that he or she has six more
months to live with a bit of pain or weakness, he or she may decide to commit suicide before
letting nature take its course. This denies them any precious time that may be spent with friends
and relatives in their final days, and, however slim it might be, it leaves no chance for a miracle
recovery or discovering a medical error, meaning that the patient has a lot more time
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia – Response to Anti Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it
is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being right or wrong is one that most would prefer left
alone. However, recent publicity on changes to existing laws has ignited considerable discussion and
has forced open the door to a much wider audience. The issues related to direct euthanasia have
raised many questions in my mind, to which I am still searching for answers. I believe it is
necessary to consider arguments, both, for and against, in order to come to any conclusion. In this
paper I will address Brian Clowes' article in the "Pro–Life Activist's Encyclopedia",
located on the...show more content...
Yet, his persistent use of medical cases where patients were classified as irreversibly comatose
and where all decisions regarding their continual treatment were made by others, neglects to
recognize the numerous cases of terminally ill patients, who simply ask for the right to control
their own destiny and to die with dignity. His use of extreme cases, all of which were found in
'National Right to Life News', gives the reader a distorted picture and neglects the many types of
cases where the prolonging of life would be cruel, inhumane and immoral. (Johnstone, 1994:353)
EUTHANASIA SETS A BAD EXAMPLE? I would ask what kind of example are we giving our
young by prolonging life at whatever cost to the person? Is quantity of life always the best option? Is
the taking of human life always wrong? In the 18th century William Mitford, an English historian
stated "Men fear death, as if unquestionably the greatess evil, and yet no man knows that it
may not be the greatest good." (Bradley, Daniels & Jones, 1969:194) Here the author
compares the act of suicide among the young with the act of euthanasia with the terminally ill. He
believes, in making euthanasia an acceptable social practice, it will inevitably have negative
repercussions on the rest of society. The writer argues that by condoning euthanasia, we condone

Euthanasia Essay examples
Euthanasia is often called "mercy killing". It is intentionally making someone die, rather than
allowing that person to die naturally. It is sometimes the act of ending someone's life, who is
terminally ill, or is suffering in severe pain. Euthanasia is mostly illegal in the world today.
Euthanasia can be considered a form of suicide, if the person afflicted with the problem actively
does it. The person volunteering to commit the act to that person can also consider it a form of
murder.
The positive side of Euthanasia is that it ends a person's suffering in this world. Many physicians and
psychiatrists believe that it may a humane act. From a virtue ethics point of view, it may be
appropriate. What we seek in human existence is to be...show more content...
The benefits are numerous in that the person euthanized would cease suffering, and the families
would begin the healing process from grief and/or depression from the situation.
From Mill's perspective, the person volunteering for euthanasia has a liberty to do what he/she
wants. Mill has written that if the person does not cause harm to others, it is the person's right, or
liberty, to do what they please. If a person wants euthanasia, then that person has the sole liberties to
choose such an act, and depart society and life. Nobody is being other than the person wishing it,
and it is a volunteered act.
Brandt argues for approval of euthanasia, but killing human beings is wrong, because it injures that
person and goes against the preferences of self–preservation. However, Brandt says that the above is
not present in the issue of euthanasia, so it may be permissible. Brandt says that not all killing is
injury, so not all killing is wrong. One should pay attention to one's expressed wishes he says.
Euthanasia could be considered doing a person a favor, because you cannot injure something if you
are relieving it of pain.
The negative side of euthanasia is that it goes against natural law ethics, because we do not let
nature take its course. We are disturbing what is occurring or happening naturally to the person.
Every person has a natural inclination to continue living. It is also said

Thesis Statement Against Euthanasia
Title: Argue Against Euthanasia
Thesis Statement: The Philippine should not allow Euthanasia because it is form of murder
Problem: Should we allow Euthanasia in the Philippines?
Answer: No
1.Introduction
1.1 Argue against Euthanasia without Resorting to "Because God doesn't like it."
2.Against Euthanasia
2.1 killing of an innocent man or child.
2.2 it morally questionable to our society
3.Resorting to Religious Belief
3.1 god has the rights
3.2 only god may decide when we will die.
4. Problems
4.1 does not solve the problem
4.2 suffering
5. Conclusion
5.1 I conclude that we should not legalized the Euthanasia here in the Philippines.
Introduction:
People all knows that Euthanasia is the act of killing someone who is very sick...show more content...
All faith's offer meaning and explanations for death and dying; faiths try to find a place for death
and dying within human experience. God gives people life, so only god has the right to talk it away.
Human lives are important because God created them, Therefore human should be protected and
preserved whatever happens and therefore we shouldn't interfere with God's plans by shortening
human lives and the catholics are disapprove of Euthanasia. Religions are opposed to euthanasia for
a number of

Ethical Arguments Against Euthanasia
Terminal illness is a very devastating and sad part of life. Every day thousands of people are
diagnosed with cancer, brain tumors, and life threatening diseases. The physicians taking care of
these individuals try their best to care for them, offering chemotherapy treatments, radiation, and
different medications to treat these illnesses, but unfortunately, they are not always effective.
Sometimes the illness just takes over and the patient no longer has a chance to live. They are just
lying in a hospital bed, suffering, waiting for their inevitable end at the hands of their disease. In
these instances, many patients would beg their family and doctors to just let them die because they
were in unspeakable agony. In these instances, Euthanasia...show more content...
If something is immoral, it would have to violate moral laws and norms. The argument proposed
by those against Euthanasia is that it is immoral because life must be "preserved and protected."
The preservation of life should be left up to the choice of the person and not the choice of the
physician. Also, Euthanasia cannot be considered murder because murder infringes on a person's life
by taking away the choice in that person's death. There is no infringement upon anyone's rights
however when the person chooses themselves that they want to end their suffering and how to do it.
If a physician denies someone their right to die when under intense pain and suffering, they are
forcing them to live a life without dignity, a life of suffering and eventual death. Their intentions
may be pure, but no one should have the right to make someone else live a life of pain and
suffering. Removing their right to choose is what's

Argumentative Essay On Human Euthanasia
Human Euthanasia
It is a shared understanding that human life must be valued under any circumstance, and it should
not be terminated for whatever reasons unless it is a natural occurrence. The value and respect for
human life were behind the debate against "the death row" in many states and countries around the
world. In addition, religion places high value in human life, basing on the claim that it is a sin to
end one's life. However, there have been instances where ending the life of another person is the
best alternative, especially in medical cases. The idea brought the emergence of euthanasia, where
Math and Chaturvedi (2012) explain it as a Greek word that means "good death." The purpose of
good death is to assist a patient who will...show more content...
Math and Chaturvedi (2012) observe that a common claim on euthanasia is the idea that most
patients with chronic illnesses do not want to be a burden to their loved ones. In such instances, the
patients come to consider it as the best alternative. It is regarded as an honor to the "right of living"
through accepting the "right to die" (Math & Chartuvedi, 2012).
A CNN report by Ben Tinker claims that in the state of California, one hundred and eleven people
died under the right to die law. According to Tinker (2017), the End of Life Option Act took effect
on 9th June 2016. It provided that individuals starting from the age of eighteen had the right to
request medication that was life–ending from their doctors. The circumstances of such requests were
only when the patient was suffering from a terminal illness, and they decided to have a death
timetable. As Tinker (2017) reports, the Act enabled two hundred and fifty–eight persons to initiate
the process. Such significant figures indicate that people find it okay to end their lives rather than
suffer in the struggle to remain alive. It is argued that in doing so, the people preserve their dignity
and may even die a "happy death", as they know they had to choose how they died.
BBC (2014) presented arguments against euthanasia and classified it as ethical, practical, and
religious. The moral argument was based on the sanctity of life. It presented that by allowing the
society to practice euthanasia, it was an approach to

Arguments Against Euthanasia
A spoken word euthanasia of Daniel Callahan by self– determination is an adequate representation
of the human issue that faces not only a nation but as a world. In the self–determination, he expertly
points out the many misconceptions humanity has mad about the human. Some belief the euthanasia
to be restful, while others believe there can never be peaceful for any consequences for our actions
(Daniel, 344). Throughout this essay, I aim to not only argue against euthanasia but also to provide
some reasonable alternatives. Various changes to the euthanasia have become more apparent as
human issue and doctor find an innovated means to measure them. Many are direct consequences of
a euthanasia action. Euthanasia is a serious political, moral and ethical problem in these days. Most
people either strictly prevent it or decidedly favor euthanasia. After reading self–determination, I still
support and promote the legalization of euthanasia. I believe that all people deserve the right to die
with dignity. However, Callahan argued that euthanasia believes turning to four central category
debate such as self–determination, killing and allowing to die, calculating the consequence, and
euthanasia and medical practices. In this essay, I will discuss some arguments for and against
euthanasia.
First of all, self–determination gives people to decide their own beliefs about life and how they can
conduct their life. Callahan was asking the question, "what does it mean and how far should it

Argumentative Arguments Against Euthanasia
Euthanasia and assisted dying are one of the controversial topics that are highly argumentative for its
legalization in many countries. Through it is legal in some countries of Europe, few states in the
US, Canada, Japan, Australia is one of the countries that still against legalizing Euthanasia or
assisted Dying.Though once this option was legal in NT, reformation of law has caused it to be
illegal again.Discussion of this topic is prevalent in media which often fueled by the nonfrequent
prosecution of individual who becomes involved in the death of patients wanting death by lethal
drugs causing death(QUT,2017).Arguments against legalizing euthanasia in Australia has been
discussed in this essay.
Euthanasia is a deliberate intentional act of an individual to end the life of another individual in
order to relieve them from intractable suffering (QUT,2017). This term is often perceived in different
ways. Most common three includes – a)Voluntary euthanasia: performed to end one's life with their
consent, here the person is competent.For example; physician injects the suffering patient with lethal
substance after being requested (QUT,2017) b) Non–Voluntary Euthanasia: performed when the
person is not competent. For example; physician injecting the patient with lethal substance under the
unresponsive state in post–coma (QUT,2017) c)Involuntary Euthanasia: performed when a patient is
competent but has not requested their death wish. For example; performed when patiently is at

Essay Pro Euthanasia
When someone is inevitably dying and in inexplicable pain is it really a crime to grant their wishes
and end their suffering? As of right now euthanasia is illegal in many countries and is a very
controversial topic. Is it compassion for the patient helping them in ending their life or murder? The
doctor is not giving death as an option, it is the patients choice and even where it is legal there are
many rules. Euthanasia should not be considered a crime because the patient is not being murdered;
they are having their suffering end in a painless, humane way out of compassion for the patient and
their family.
Euthanasia is defined by the World Book Millennium 2000 encyclopaedia as, "the practise of
painlessly ending the lives of people...show more content...
The reason to legalize euthanasia is clear, these people need to have the choice to die with dignity.
Dr. Jack Kevorkian more commonly known as Dr. Death is greatly known for his opinion that
euthanasia should be legalized and his work with patients seeking help. He was very important in
showing euthanasia and voicing his opinion on the subject so the public could not ignore the
importance of the matter. Dr. Kevorkian was said to have been involved with 130 suicides by
patients who wanted to end their own lives (Nicol and Wylie 17). He had two machines he used to
help the patients, one an injection and the other a mask, however both machines were operated by
the patient and although Dr. Kevorkian was taken to court many times for these he was not
convicted because the patient was in control. He was very careful as to not actually commit the act
himself until he was contacted by Thomas Youk, a young with Lou Gheric's disease; Lou Gheric's
disease is when the muscle stop working and eventually the patient chokes to death. Tom's condition
prevented him from actually operating the machines and therefore Dr. Kevorkian decided that he
would operate the machine himself because he cared greatly about all his patients and could not let
Tom live in his constant fear (Nicol and Wylie 11). Dr. Kevorkian taped Tom's wishes and then
himself hooking up the machine and pushing the button to inject the drugs. He then proceed to

Persuasive Essay Against Euthanasia
Euthanasia
"You only get one life. It's actually your duty to live it as fully as possible." (Moyes, Jojo. Me
before you. Penguin Books, 2016). Life is a celestial object, and we are obliged to handle our lives
with prudence. Abdicating your life is vile and dissolute. Assisting in the termination of one's own
life is even more absurd; therefore, it should be hindered. Euthanasia should be stated illegal and
prohibited throughout the whole world, for it leads to disadvantageous long–term consciences
including distrusting the medical field and giving more power to doctors than what they deserve.
Usually, those who demand euthanasia are pressured by those around them including doctors, and
they are deceived by their depression.
Euthanasia devastate patients' trust in the medical field. If your teacher gave you the choice
whether to do your homework or not, what will you choose? Of course, you won't do your
homework because it is the easier choice. Human beings are inevitable to pick the obstacle–free
route; therefore, if doctors were given the choice to simply kill people whose cases seem
unpromising, they will select this choice. Doctors will be discouraged to research and create new
medicines. "What is the point? I can just painlessly and effortlessly kill them". Cures that could
extenuate pain will not be discovered anymore, and scientists would not even try to invent
cotemporary medicines. Moreover, accepting euthanasia is a breach of The International Code of
Medical

Ethical Arguments Against Euthanasia
I will let my aunt chose to live or die! Euthanasia also medically termed as "physician–assisted
suicide", is medically defined; by the Merriam–Webster Dictionary as suicide by a patient facilitated
by means or information (as a drug prescription or indication of the lethal dosage) provided by a
physician who is aware of how the patient intends to use such means or information. Individuals all
over the world are living through this situation without being supported.With this being said the
acceptance of this will allow my aunt to not live through suffering from ovarian cancer. Although
many deem euthanasia wrong, it is medically ethical for physicians to assist terminal patient's choice
to end their lives because it exercises a patient's autonomy on living without suffering critically.
Therefore, physicians shall ethically support the allowing of euthanasia....show more content...
Based on physician assisted suicide's history, it's an effectual topic to review to understand that
euthanasia became a topic to discuss around 400 B.C.. When the Hippocratic Oath by "Father of
Medicine" Greek physician Hippocrates existed. His ethical choice was to not give an individual
deadly medicine. During this time many places believed life was to precious to throw away. In
contradiction to not supporting the ethics of a physician to aid in an individual's death, other believed
that it should be allowed. Sir Thomas More is often quoted to be the first important Christian to
recommend physician–assisted suicide. Throught the years many individuals have fought to go for or
against the moralities of choosing death when suffering critically. Till today it is still a subject of
matter that's under

Why Euthanasia is Wrong Essay
"Thou Shalt Not Kill" (Exodus 20: 13–14). One of the Ten Commandments put forward by God to
Moses at the top of Mount Sinai. The killing of another human being is morally wrong and
unacceptable. No one has the right to take away another persons life, whether it be through hatred
and disgust, or compassion and love. Murder is murder. So why should those select few who work
in the clinics of Switzerland, whose occupation is to assist in a person's suicide, become immune
from this law against murder. It is them who provide the patient with, and administer, the method of
how they are going to die. To me, that sounds like murder.
What gives someone else the right to take away another human being's life?
Euthanasia is wrong and immoral for...show more content...
It also means that it slides from terminally ill patients using it, to anybody using it. For instance,
people who become depressed and may see this as an option to end their depression, if it became
available in the UK. For something as minor as depression (compared to terminal cancer), which
can be treated through doctors and psychologists someone could take their life if they had this
option. Also, doctors could see it as an opportunity to free up beds in a hospital and save it money at
the same time. A 1998 study found that doctors who are cost–conscious and 'practice
resource–conserving medicine' are significantly more likely to write a lethal prescription for
terminally–ill patients [Arch. Intern. Med., 5/11/98, p. 974]. This suggests to us that medical costs
do influence doctors' opinions.
But doctors should not be involved in directly causing death. This brings us to the controversial
point of active and passive euthanasia. Some people think there is no real difference between the
two, since stopping a treatment and administering one are both deliberate acts. But there is a moral
difference between letting a person die peacefully and deliberately killing the person. Thou shalt not
kill but needst not strive, officiously, to keep alive.

Euthanasia
End of life – Euthanasia – Arguments for and against euthanasia. (2006, April 1). Retrieved
November 6, 2015.
This article sets out the most vital and most recurrently adduced arguments for and against
euthanasia. Each subdivision takes as its root, one aspect of the discussion. For example, autonomy
and the inviolability of life, designating how it is probable to argue both for and against euthanasia,
correspondingly, on the basis of the identical facet. It suggests "The account will include such
arguments as take a positive point of reference in the individual concept as well as some that take
critical issue with it. For instance, the arguments that home in on the incompatibility of euthanasia
with autonomy, whereas among other things the other section contains arguments that are based on
a critique of the actual concept of the sanctity of life." Supporters of euthanasia encourage the
authorization of killing on appeal of the patient in a few situations. Never the less the article also
anticipates how the problem of euthanasia is not only legalization but also the way and
circumstances it should be legalized for. It is vital to distinguish between negative and positive
reasoning of self–determination concerning assisted suicide. It helps us to differentiate a positive
right of self–determination regarding euthanasia and a negative right of self–determination regarding
euthanasia. Helps us identify the fundamental difference stating how the first form of legalization,

Ethics of Euthanasia Essay
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use
to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without
assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to
depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant
feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from
this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would
give a patient an aid in dying. "Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on
the question of whether, in certain situations,...show more content...
Whether murder is done in a peaceful, non painful way or in a very gruesome, unimaginable way,
it is still considered murder. Physicians have no way of knowing 'what is best for the patient'
especially if that patient's terminal illness prevents them from speaking. Not only is assisted
suicide considered murder, it also goes against Physicians' Hippocratic Oath. "Hippocratic Oath:
An oath (or promise) all physicians must swear to uphold, regarding the ethical practices of the
medical profession" (Lee). By allowing doctors to stray from this oath, it will be easier for them to
aid in or carry out assisted suicides when it will never be entirely necessary for them to consider the
option. "In 2005, Texas doctors removed two patients from life support without advanced directions
and against the wishes of the patient's family" (Pawlick). By not legalizing assisted suicides, families
will be able to decide when their family member is physically unable to continue with the provided
treatments, but only when the patient themselves can no longer communicate their wishes and no
document stating how they should go about the situation has been left in their families possession.
Ethical issues are not the only problem. Some argue that euthanasia also creates issues from a legal
perspective. "One legal question is whether assisted suicide violates the Controlled Substances Act, a
federal law governing the distribution of drugs" (Lee). Such

Euthanasia Position Paper
Assisted Suicide, mercy killing, euthanasia; whatever you call it or however we justified it is killing
by all means. Euthanasia is a practice of ending a life to release an individual from an incurable
disease or intolerable suffering. It is an action which brings intentional death to a patient. In the case
of the elderly cancer patient, the family and the patient does not know whether or not to commit
euthanasia. The author response in this case, is that the elderly cancer patient should not go for
euthanasia, since she has a biographical life. He came to the right conclusion, even though he did not
have a valid argument. The author should have advised the patient not to commit euthanasia by
using the three main arguments against...show more content...
This means if one lost his or her biographical life, they have the right to commit euthanasia. I
disagree with the author on that people might have the right to euthanasia. The three most common
arguments against euthanasia are the Bible from a Christian prospective, the effective pain
management, and the fear of abuse if euthanasia were legalized.
One of the biggest arguments against euthanasia is the religious argument, which was not
mentioned by the author. Most religious groups especially Christianity goes against euthanasia.
The practice of euthanasia is wrong because it violates the principle that life is given by God.
God doesn't approve of "hands that shed innocent blood". Life comes from God. It is God's
decision to give life and to take it away. In the Bible, "shedding innocent blood" is called murder. The
death of King Sol is an example of euthanasia. Saul did not want the philistines to find him alive.
He knew they would torture him. He asked his solider to kill him. When the solider refused, Sol
fell on his own sword and died. Sol committed suicide, but he did it to avoid suffering. He murdered
himself and therefore was guilty of sin. Not all suffering is bad. Even though one may not always
understand why he/she suffers, some good can come from it.
The apostle Paul understood this. He had a "thorn in the flesh" he asked God to remove, but he
realized afterward that it was for his good.

Euthanasia Essay : Euthanasia And Euthanasia
This is why Euthanasia is important and summarizing the research that I found on Euthanasia.
Euthanasia is important because there is a lot of arguments about Euthanasia. Some people support it
and some people do not support Euthanasia (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Arguments).
Euthanasia allows people to be free from physical pain. It is the hastening of death of a patient to
prevent further sufferings (Euthanasia Revisited). The religious argument states God chooses when
human life ends. Euthanasia also causes mental suffering because they are in physical pain or they
are experiencing with terminal illness. It is a debatable issue. There are many different opinions on
Euthanasia. The topic that I am researching is Euthanasia. There are many different arguments for
and against Euthanasia. The four main types of arguments used by people who are against
Euthanasia are the religious argument, the 'slippery slope' argument, the medical ethics argument,
and the alternative argument (Euthanasia and assisted suicide–Argument. The pragmatic argument
and the ethical argument are the two main types of arguments used to support the practice of
Euthanasia and assisted suicide (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Argument. The ethical argument is
that people should have the freedom of choice to say if they want euthanasia or not. The pragmatic
argument is for euthanasia. . In addition, that is the definition of the topic. This is what makes the
topic interesting. What makes this topic

Proponents of anti–euthanasia argue that the desire to die is caused by depression, and as such is
fully treatable. While it is true that debilitating illnesses and terminal conditions cause depression...it
is not only common but expected. However, no degree of depression treatment can change the
circumstances of a patient's condition: terminal is terminal. There is no escape, other than death, that
can change these circumstances. Depression medication and counselling are not going to magically
return one's self–worth, satisfaction, or ease suffering when presented with the inevitable. This is not
an argument that some cases can benefit from euthanasia, but how can those cases be conducted in an
ethical, non–abusive

Arguments For And Against Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable
disease or unbearable suffering. The term euthanasia is derived from the Greek word for "good
death" and originally referred to as "intentional killing" ( Patelarou, Vardavas, Fioraki, Alegakis,
Dafermou, & Ntzilepi, 2009). Euthanasia is a controversial topic which has raised a great deal of
debate globally. Although euthanasia has received great exposure in the professional media, there
are some sticky points that lack clarity and need to be addressed. Euthanasia is a divisive topic, and
different interpretations of its meaning, depend on whether the person supports it or not. While a
few societies have accepted euthanasia, there are...show more content...
The patient voluntarily wanted to end his life because he was suffering from Lou Gehrigs's disease
(Siu, 2008). Since then, the controversy over active euthanasia has remained an ethical dilemma for
healthcare providers, patients and their family members in America and the rest of the world. The
general public's belief is that, health–care providers have professional obligations to save the lives of
their patients regardless of their health status. The majority of the public feels that, healthcare
workers' involvement in the euthanasia practice is a betrayal of the "do no harm" oath. When a
healthcare worker is involved in either active or passive euthanasia, it can be viewed as a
disregard to this value. However, the proponents for euthanasia claim that a physician turning down
a suffering patient's request to end their life is also a violation to the "do no harm" oath (Siu,
2008). The right to die falls under patient's autonomy and the basic question is whether individuals
should be allowed to end their lives if they choose to do so (Sanders & Chaloner 2007). Those in
the healthcare sector grapple with this notion on a daily bases because they have to practice under
the codes of ethics guidelines. Nurses and doctors should be cautious in their practice as they balance
the patient's autonomy and their professional ethics and guidelines. Sanders & Chaloner (2007)
pointed out that nurses and doctors know that a patient's autonomy

Persuasive Essay Against Euthanasia
It's blatantly obvious that euthanasia should be permitted for the reasoning of your own individual
rights. If you're not familiar with the term euthanasia it is a Greek word for easy death. Also
meaning "The painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an
irreversible coma." Euthanasia is illegal in most countries, for the fact that you're taking rights away
from another human being. Each individual person on earth has their liberty, which contains the
right of owning his/her life. In a usual situation he/she has a deadly disease. They are usually lying
on a hospital bed with mixes of medical equipment connected to them. They can't do anything but lay
there and try to bare with the pain. Say you're in this situation, you beg the doctor to unplug all the
equipment and let you leave to live whatever life you have left. The doctor refuses to do so because
that will definitely death and the hospital is against doing this. If you would like to die and
another person says no, result in what say do they have? You clearly are in awful pain that you just
can't bare to deal with anymore. A person has their rights which is one of many reasons it should be
legalized. Furthermore, anyone should have the right to end his/her life by euthanasia because of all
the pain and suffering one goes through. Most people in positions like this would more than rather
alleviate their pain, suffering, and depression that comes along with their

Euthanasia is the act of bringing about the easy and gentle death, usually someone who is terminally
ill or in great pain, which is why some recognise euthanasia as 'mercy killing'. There are many types
of euthanasia: Non–voluntary euthanasia is when the person concerned is no longer in a condition
where they can make a decision for themselves, and that their death can be caused by their relatives
or medical experts. Active or voluntary euthanasia is when the person concerned asks someone else
to help them to die. Passive Euthanasia is when a person is allowed to die for example the life
support system is withdrawn.
There is much evidence from the Bible that disapprove euthanasia. In...show more content...
Because all men were created in the image of God (Gen1: 26), the disabled and the weak shouldn't
be pushed from society. In addition, from the Bible you can clearly see that Jesus goes to the ones
that are physically or mentally weak and therefore the elderly should be helped to live a normal life.
Some Christians regard active euthanasia as murder, and the Roman Catholics regard euthanasia
as ' a grave violation of the law of God' because it breaks the rule:' You shall not kill' (Exodus
20:30). Some Christians would disagree with active euthanasia but support the idea of dying with
dignity, by setting up hospices like St. Christopher's hospice. The Golden rule states, 'Always treat
others as you would like them to treat you', therefore when someone is in pain, one should obtain
help to restore the ill person's life and let them enjoy life.
Some Christians would say that suffering is part of life and it shouldn't be 'dodged' by ending a
person's life. In Romans 8:18, 'I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with
the glory that will be revealed to us', here it says that suffering can be endured because even if
they die from this suffering, they will always join Jesus Christ and rejoice with God. Some
Christians would say that in our old age we should be ready and equipped for the suffering that we
will

Euthanasia Against Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Euthanasia Against Essay