SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING
56 Forsyth Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
John Ley
Clerk of Court
May 09, 2013
For rules and forms visit
www.ca11.uscourts.gov
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES
Appeal Number: 13-11599-EE
Case Style: Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc.
District Court Docket No: 1:11-cv-20120-AMS
On April 1, 2013, this Court began MANDATORY electronic filing. All counsel are required to
file documents electronically in appeals pending on April 1, 2013, and in appeals docketed in
this Court on or after that date, unless exempted for good cause.
CIVIL APPEALS ARE GOVERNED BY STRINGENT PROCEDURES FOR
REQUESTING EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE BRIEFS AND RECORD EXCERPTS.
RULES PROVIDE FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE WHEN A BRIEF
OR RECORD EXCERPTS IS NOT FILED OR CORRECTED WITHIN THE TIME
PERMITTED. PLEASE SEE THE CIRCUIT RULES AT WWW.CA11.USCOURTS.GOV
Eleventh Circuit Rule 31-1 requires that APPELLANT'S BRIEF AND RECORD EXCERPTS
BE SERVED AND FILED ON OR BEFORE June 3, 2013. *PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT
BRIEF HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND FILED. YOU MUST FILE RECORD EXCERPTS
BY THE DUE DATE.
This is the only notice you will receive concerning the due date for filing briefs and record
excerpts. See Fed.R.App.P. 28, 30, 31 and 32, and the corresponding circuit rules, for further
information on preparing briefs and record excerpts. If you have not entered your appearance in
this appeal, please note that the clerk may not accept your motions or other filings. See 11th Cir.
R. 46-5. Appearance of Counsel Forms are available on the court's Web site at
www.ca11.uscourts.gov. Motions for extensions of time to file a brief are frowned upon by the
court.
Attorneys must file briefs electronically using the ECF system. Use of ECF does not modify the
requirements of the circuit rules that counsel must also provide seven (7) paper copies of a brief
to the court, nor does it modify the requirements of the circuit rules for the filing of record
excerpts or expanded record excerpts in a particular case.
Case: 13-11599 Date Filed: 05/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2
Attorneys and pro se parties in districts not participating in the Electronic Records on Appeal
Program must file record excerpts in conformance with 11th Cir. R. 30-1 and 30-2. Attorneys
and pro se parties in districts that are participating in the Electronic Records on Appeal Program,
and whose cases are included in the program, must file expanded record excerpts in conformance
with the Electronic Records on Appeal Program Components and Instructions for Preparing
Expanded Record Excerpts, available on the court's Web site. Pro se parties who are incarcerated
are not required to file record excerpts.
Sincerely,
JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court
Reply to: Lois Tunstall, EE/dc/
Phone #: (404) 335-6224
BR-1CIV Civil appeal briefing ntc issued
Case: 13-11599 Date Filed: 05/09/2013 Page: 2 of 2

More Related Content

What's hot

Activists ask court to stop budget (Guardian)
Activists ask court to stop budget (Guardian)Activists ask court to stop budget (Guardian)
Activists ask court to stop budget (Guardian)
Aigbokhan President
 
Soldier familynewsletter nov2010
Soldier familynewsletter nov2010Soldier familynewsletter nov2010
Soldier familynewsletter nov2010
Fort Rucker FRSA
 
Suresh chandra sharma(petitioner)
Suresh chandra sharma(petitioner)Suresh chandra sharma(petitioner)
Suresh chandra sharma(petitioner)
Dhruv Tripathi
 

What's hot (14)

First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated  24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated  24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
 
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
 
Cwp pil
Cwp pilCwp pil
Cwp pil
 
Nebraska response
Nebraska responseNebraska response
Nebraska response
 
Bombay hc april 15
Bombay hc april 15Bombay hc april 15
Bombay hc april 15
 
748
748748
748
 
Activists ask court to stop budget (Guardian)
Activists ask court to stop budget (Guardian)Activists ask court to stop budget (Guardian)
Activists ask court to stop budget (Guardian)
 
Dept of Homeland Security Career Fair
Dept of Homeland Security Career FairDept of Homeland Security Career Fair
Dept of Homeland Security Career Fair
 
Soldier familynewsletter nov2010
Soldier familynewsletter nov2010Soldier familynewsletter nov2010
Soldier familynewsletter nov2010
 
Saathik ali v state
Saathik ali v stateSaathik ali v state
Saathik ali v state
 
Reactivating closed immigration cases, what’s next?
Reactivating closed immigration cases, what’s next?Reactivating closed immigration cases, what’s next?
Reactivating closed immigration cases, what’s next?
 
567823f letter-wb
567823f letter-wb567823f letter-wb
567823f letter-wb
 
Suresh chandra sharma(petitioner)
Suresh chandra sharma(petitioner)Suresh chandra sharma(petitioner)
Suresh chandra sharma(petitioner)
 
Research Center at PEMRA
Research Center at PEMRAResearch Center at PEMRA
Research Center at PEMRA
 

Similar to Case 13 11599

After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013
REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013
REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013
Oluyemisi Dansu
 
Appellateprocess05072010
Appellateprocess05072010Appellateprocess05072010
Appellateprocess05072010
mbe247tv
 
Fresenius mdl scheduling order filed 7 29-2013
Fresenius mdl scheduling order filed 7 29-2013Fresenius mdl scheduling order filed 7 29-2013
Fresenius mdl scheduling order filed 7 29-2013
Michael J. Evans
 
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
Umesh Heendeniya
 
Mollway's order allowing Civil Beat to live blog
Mollway's order allowing Civil Beat to live blogMollway's order allowing Civil Beat to live blog
Mollway's order allowing Civil Beat to live blog
Honolulu Civil Beat
 

Similar to Case 13 11599 (20)

After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
 
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
 
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
 
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuit
 
Virginia Rules of The Court
Virginia Rules of The CourtVirginia Rules of The Court
Virginia Rules of The Court
 
REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013
REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013
REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013
 
REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013
REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013
REVIEW OF AMCON PRACTISE DIRECTIONS 2013
 
Media order 10.20.2011
Media order 10.20.2011Media order 10.20.2011
Media order 10.20.2011
 
Appellateprocess05072010
Appellateprocess05072010Appellateprocess05072010
Appellateprocess05072010
 
Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012
Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012
Kerala Highcourt Second Judgement :UGC NET June 2012
 
UFLTV’s ARGUMENTS CHALLENGING THE FACTUAL AND LEGAL ASSERTIONS OF THE COURT’S...
UFLTV’s ARGUMENTS CHALLENGING THE FACTUAL AND LEGAL ASSERTIONS OF THE COURT’S...UFLTV’s ARGUMENTS CHALLENGING THE FACTUAL AND LEGAL ASSERTIONS OF THE COURT’S...
UFLTV’s ARGUMENTS CHALLENGING THE FACTUAL AND LEGAL ASSERTIONS OF THE COURT’S...
 
Fresenius mdl scheduling order filed 7 29-2013
Fresenius mdl scheduling order filed 7 29-2013Fresenius mdl scheduling order filed 7 29-2013
Fresenius mdl scheduling order filed 7 29-2013
 
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
 
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuitAfter opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
After opening an appeals case by pro se litigants – 9th circuit
 
Rajesh singh v state of up
Rajesh singh v state of upRajesh singh v state of up
Rajesh singh v state of up
 
Order extending injunction
Order extending injunctionOrder extending injunction
Order extending injunction
 
Stephen A. Odeyemi Vs Nigeria Telecommunications Plc
Stephen A. Odeyemi Vs Nigeria Telecommunications PlcStephen A. Odeyemi Vs Nigeria Telecommunications Plc
Stephen A. Odeyemi Vs Nigeria Telecommunications Plc
 
Mollway's order allowing Civil Beat to live blog
Mollway's order allowing Civil Beat to live blogMollway's order allowing Civil Beat to live blog
Mollway's order allowing Civil Beat to live blog
 
Emergency Arbitrator: Overseas Experience and Russian Arbitration Law
Emergency Arbitrator:Overseas Experience and Russian Arbitration LawEmergency Arbitrator:Overseas Experience and Russian Arbitration Law
Emergency Arbitrator: Overseas Experience and Russian Arbitration Law
 
Anhing v. Viet Phu - Order denying defendant's motion for attorney's fees
Anhing v. Viet Phu  - Order denying defendant's motion for attorney's feesAnhing v. Viet Phu  - Order denying defendant's motion for attorney's fees
Anhing v. Viet Phu - Order denying defendant's motion for attorney's fees
 

More from Cocoselul Inaripat

More from Cocoselul Inaripat (20)

Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8
 
Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8Traian Bujduveanu 8
Traian Bujduveanu 8
 
Spyology / vizualizare subiect agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi cia
Spyology / vizualizare subiect   agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi ciaSpyology / vizualizare subiect   agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi cia
Spyology / vizualizare subiect agentul bujduveanu, sendviş între fbi şi cia
 
Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1
 
Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5
 
Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4
 
Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3
 
Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2
 
Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7
 
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...
 
Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5
 
Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1
 
Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7Traian bujduveanu 7
Traian bujduveanu 7
 
Traian bujduveanu 6
Traian bujduveanu 6Traian bujduveanu 6
Traian bujduveanu 6
 
Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5Traian bujduveanu 5
Traian bujduveanu 5
 
Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4Traian bujduveanu 4
Traian bujduveanu 4
 
Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3
 
Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3Traian bujduveanu 3
Traian bujduveanu 3
 
Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2Traian bujduveanu 2
Traian bujduveanu 2
 
Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1Traian bujduveanu 1
Traian bujduveanu 1
 

Case 13 11599

  • 1. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING 56 Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 John Ley Clerk of Court May 09, 2013 For rules and forms visit www.ca11.uscourts.gov MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES Appeal Number: 13-11599-EE Case Style: Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc. District Court Docket No: 1:11-cv-20120-AMS On April 1, 2013, this Court began MANDATORY electronic filing. All counsel are required to file documents electronically in appeals pending on April 1, 2013, and in appeals docketed in this Court on or after that date, unless exempted for good cause. CIVIL APPEALS ARE GOVERNED BY STRINGENT PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE BRIEFS AND RECORD EXCERPTS. RULES PROVIDE FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE WHEN A BRIEF OR RECORD EXCERPTS IS NOT FILED OR CORRECTED WITHIN THE TIME PERMITTED. PLEASE SEE THE CIRCUIT RULES AT WWW.CA11.USCOURTS.GOV Eleventh Circuit Rule 31-1 requires that APPELLANT'S BRIEF AND RECORD EXCERPTS BE SERVED AND FILED ON OR BEFORE June 3, 2013. *PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT BRIEF HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND FILED. YOU MUST FILE RECORD EXCERPTS BY THE DUE DATE. This is the only notice you will receive concerning the due date for filing briefs and record excerpts. See Fed.R.App.P. 28, 30, 31 and 32, and the corresponding circuit rules, for further information on preparing briefs and record excerpts. If you have not entered your appearance in this appeal, please note that the clerk may not accept your motions or other filings. See 11th Cir. R. 46-5. Appearance of Counsel Forms are available on the court's Web site at www.ca11.uscourts.gov. Motions for extensions of time to file a brief are frowned upon by the court. Attorneys must file briefs electronically using the ECF system. Use of ECF does not modify the requirements of the circuit rules that counsel must also provide seven (7) paper copies of a brief to the court, nor does it modify the requirements of the circuit rules for the filing of record excerpts or expanded record excerpts in a particular case. Case: 13-11599 Date Filed: 05/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2
  • 2. Attorneys and pro se parties in districts not participating in the Electronic Records on Appeal Program must file record excerpts in conformance with 11th Cir. R. 30-1 and 30-2. Attorneys and pro se parties in districts that are participating in the Electronic Records on Appeal Program, and whose cases are included in the program, must file expanded record excerpts in conformance with the Electronic Records on Appeal Program Components and Instructions for Preparing Expanded Record Excerpts, available on the court's Web site. Pro se parties who are incarcerated are not required to file record excerpts. Sincerely, JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court Reply to: Lois Tunstall, EE/dc/ Phone #: (404) 335-6224 BR-1CIV Civil appeal briefing ntc issued Case: 13-11599 Date Filed: 05/09/2013 Page: 2 of 2