TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
ADR - 6TH MAY - V K GUPTA - 2ND LECTURE
1. Alternate Dispute ResolutionAlternate Dispute Resolution
(Commercial Conciliation & Arbitration)(Commercial Conciliation & Arbitration)
Company of Master MarinersCompany of Master Mariners
55thth
& 6& 6thth
May 2018May 2018
Company of Master MarinersCompany of Master Mariners
55thth
& 6& 6thth
May 2018May 2018
2. 2
Drafting Arbitration ClausesDrafting Arbitration Clauses
WrittenWritten agreement - a pre-requisite:agreement - a pre-requisite:
• Usually thru a clause in original contract – (Usually thru a clause in original contract – (but considered anbut considered an
independent contract);independent contract);
• Arbitration agreement can be made even after disputes arise.Arbitration agreement can be made even after disputes arise.
• As party-autonomy the basic principle, parties can chooseAs party-autonomy the basic principle, parties can choose
applicable law; Whether conciliation a pre-requisite; numberapplicable law; Whether conciliation a pre-requisite; number
& qualifications of arbitrators; Place and Seat of Arbitration;& qualifications of arbitrators; Place and Seat of Arbitration;
Extent of Discovery and also agree on how the arbitralExtent of Discovery and also agree on how the arbitral
process will be regulatedprocess will be regulated
• Arbitration agreements not binding on third parties;Arbitration agreements not binding on third parties;
• For low value claims – No oral hearing and evidence;For low value claims – No oral hearing and evidence;
3. 3
Desirable features in Arbitration ClausesDesirable features in Arbitration Clauses::
• Simplicity, clarity and unambiguous language;Simplicity, clarity and unambiguous language;
• Aim to keep expenses low;Aim to keep expenses low;
• Institutional Rules to be incorporated????Institutional Rules to be incorporated????
• Arbitrator – Number of arbitrators, qualifications and selectionArbitrator – Number of arbitrators, qualifications and selection
procedures (Avoid retired judges, non-commercial lawyers and lawprocedures (Avoid retired judges, non-commercial lawyers and law
professors -- Especially in the Indian context)professors -- Especially in the Indian context)
• Give due importance to domain knowledge and experience;Give due importance to domain knowledge and experience;
• Commercial men??? – meaning of???Commercial men??? – meaning of???
• Appearance of Lawyers??Appearance of Lawyers??
• Applicable Law – Substantive and Procedural;Applicable Law – Substantive and Procedural;
• Venue and Seat of Arbitration,Venue and Seat of Arbitration,
• Language;Language;
4. 4
INVOKING ARBITRATIONINVOKING ARBITRATION
1.1. Written notice a must – (S.21)Written notice a must – (S.21)
2.2. Purposes: 1. Save Limitation; 2. Put the RespondentPurposes: 1. Save Limitation; 2. Put the Respondent
on notice that you mean business;on notice that you mean business;
3.3. Precautions: (i) Ensure that any pre-requisites arePrecautions: (i) Ensure that any pre-requisites are
complied with; (ii) Keep the notice short – no needcomplied with; (ii) Keep the notice short – no need
to give the history of the dispute or the amount ofto give the history of the dispute or the amount of
Claim; (iii) The nominated arbitrator meets theClaim; (iii) The nominated arbitrator meets the
qualifications mentioned in the arbitrationqualifications mentioned in the arbitration
agreement; (iv) The notice is sent in such manneragreement; (iv) The notice is sent in such manner
that service can be proved beyond doubt.that service can be proved beyond doubt.
5. 5
NNominating the “RIGHT” Arbitrator-Iominating the “RIGHT” Arbitrator-I
“A“Arbitration is only as good as the Arbitrators”rbitration is only as good as the Arbitrators”
1.1. Impartiality, neutrality and independence;Impartiality, neutrality and independence;
2.2. Subject matter experience and knowledge;Subject matter experience and knowledge;
3.3. Arbitral experience and reputation;Arbitral experience and reputation;
4.4. Knowledge of laws governing disputes and procedures;Knowledge of laws governing disputes and procedures;
5.5. Language skills;Language skills;
6.6. Good “listening” attitude and mental alertness;Good “listening” attitude and mental alertness;
7.7. Availability for conducting arbitration;Availability for conducting arbitration;
8.8. DiligenceDiligence
9.9. Are previous Awards well written?Are previous Awards well written?
10.10. Does he / she work well with other arbitrators?Does he / she work well with other arbitrators?
11.11. Does he “balance” the opponent’s arbitrator?Does he “balance” the opponent’s arbitrator?
12.12. Age and HealthAge and Health
Make own enquiries – Do not appoint arbitrators on theMake own enquiries – Do not appoint arbitrators on the
basis of reports from ill informed sources or friendsbasis of reports from ill informed sources or friends
6. 6
NNominating the “RIGHT” Arbitrator-IIominating the “RIGHT” Arbitrator-II
Retired Judge or Commercial – Technical Person?Retired Judge or Commercial – Technical Person?
Retired JudgesRetired Judges::
1.1. More likely to be neutral but lack subject matter knowledgeMore likely to be neutral but lack subject matter knowledge
2.2. Tend to be hyper-technical on procedures and evidenceTend to be hyper-technical on procedures and evidence
3.3. Generally fail to appreciate circumstances and tenor of commercial correspondenceGenerally fail to appreciate circumstances and tenor of commercial correspondence
4.4. Sometimes very old – probability of not surviving the arbitrationSometimes very old – probability of not surviving the arbitration
5.5. Often too busy to give frequent datesOften too busy to give frequent dates
6.6. Indulgent to lawyers in granting time on flimsy excusesIndulgent to lawyers in granting time on flimsy excuses
7.7. Do not make effort to read matters in advanceDo not make effort to read matters in advance
8.8. Not committed to quick and expeditious disposalNot committed to quick and expeditious disposal
Commercial Arbitrators:Commercial Arbitrators:
1.1. Lack language skills and analytical thinking to impartially assess evidence;Lack language skills and analytical thinking to impartially assess evidence;
2.2. Tend to get swayed by lawyers’ histrionics.Tend to get swayed by lawyers’ histrionics.
3.3. Tend to lose sight of the fact that their job is to make a broad commercial judgment.Tend to lose sight of the fact that their job is to make a broad commercial judgment.
4.4. Tend to worry about being challenged in courts.Tend to worry about being challenged in courts.
5.5. Occasionally, when working with judges or senior lawyers, tend to get over- awed –Occasionally, when working with judges or senior lawyers, tend to get over- awed –
particularly with use of legal jargon;particularly with use of legal jargon;
6.6. Often unable distinguish between rOften unable distinguish between ratio decidendiatio decidendi and obiter dictaand obiter dicta
7. 7
Controlling costs and theControlling costs and the
Arbitration ProcessArbitration Process
1.1. Know your contractual obligations and rightsKnow your contractual obligations and rights
2.2. Know ALL the FACTS, PROS AND CONSKnow ALL the FACTS, PROS AND CONS (NO WISHFUL THINKING AND ASSUMPTIONS!)(NO WISHFUL THINKING AND ASSUMPTIONS!)
3.3. Make only realistically realizable claims;Make only realistically realizable claims;
4.4. Maintain an attitude towards “commercial” resolution of the dispute – notMaintain an attitude towards “commercial” resolution of the dispute – not
at asserting legal rights and scoring points;at asserting legal rights and scoring points;
5.5. Assess the probability of enforcing your AwardAssess the probability of enforcing your Award
6.6. Foresee disputes developing and draft all correspondence conciselyForesee disputes developing and draft all correspondence concisely
(avoid verbosity)– “without prejudice” when necessary (but not always);(avoid verbosity)– “without prejudice” when necessary (but not always);
7.7. Preserve ALL evidence – especially from the “field”;Preserve ALL evidence – especially from the “field”;
8.8. Make a pre-arbitration assessment – preferably by a neutral expert;Make a pre-arbitration assessment – preferably by a neutral expert;
9.9. Make only merit based claims – Avoid frivolous / exaggerated claims;Make only merit based claims – Avoid frivolous / exaggerated claims;
10.10. Limit Witness Affidavits / Statements to relevant & essential facts;Limit Witness Affidavits / Statements to relevant & essential facts;
11.11. If lawyers draft pleadings – check the FACTS are correctly stated;If lawyers draft pleadings – check the FACTS are correctly stated;
12.12. May discuss probable cross examination – but do not “coach” witnessesMay discuss probable cross examination – but do not “coach” witnesses
8. 8
How NOT to cross examine witnessesHow NOT to cross examine witnesses
(A pick of some questions asked by lawyers)(A pick of some questions asked by lawyers)
1.1. Now, tNow, the two ships that collided, how far apart would you say they werehe two ships that collided, how far apart would you say they were
at the time of the collision?at the time of the collision?
2.2. Is it not true that you were on the navigation bridge until the time you leftIs it not true that you were on the navigation bridge until the time you left
it?it?
3.3. Were you present in court this morning when you were sworn in?Were you present in court this morning when you were sworn in?
4.4. Were you alone or by yourself?Were you alone or by yourself?
5.5. LawyerLawyer: Ms. Desai, is your appearance this morning pursuant to the notice which: Ms. Desai, is your appearance this morning pursuant to the notice which
was dispatched to you by my office?was dispatched to you by my office?
Ms. DesaiMs. Desai : No. This is how I always dress when I go to work.: No. This is how I always dress when I go to work.
Occasional Disputes – an inseparable part of doing business. But when they do occur, the objective should be to:
Resolve them earliest;
Least cost in Time and Money – So you can get on with your main business
At best advantageous terms; and
Continue to maintain cordial business relations.
When we first thought of this course, we had no clearly delineated lesson plans. COURSE OBJECTIVES:
Introduce ship-masters and commercial executives to ADR;
Out-line of statutory provisions;
Practical suggestions to avoid delays and minimise costs.
Mariner’s role in shipping disputes
C.
Total period about 30 minutes to cover the topics shown
1. Arbitration Agreement is an independent contract: Hence not binding on 3rd parties – such as 3rd party Bill of Lading Holders. (However: See Supreme Court in the case of Baltic Confidence (20 August 2001) holding that the intention of the parties is to be judged from all the attendant circumstances)
THE MOST IMPORTANT STEP IN ARBITRAL PROCESS AND THE MAIN REASON TO CHOOSE ALTERNATIVE TO COURTS
Judges lack subject matter knowledge: Example of anchor in front and back – after hearing expert evidence for over an year.
Know contractual obligations: Example of not knowing what GAFTA-100 was and of not knowing the contract provided no consequential damages are permissible.
Know ALL THE FACTS:
Junior personnel not informing the Seniors of short-comings – for instance that flour had got wet in railway wagons prior shipment;
OR that they had protested crane break downs to the Master only verbally but had failed to put in the SOF.
Example of “Certificate of Hold Readiness” subject to spreading mats.
Avoid Exaggerated Claims:
An oil major asking for loss of contamination of pre-existing cargo in shore tanks;
Both sides asking for interest @ 21% per annum – and both sides opposing it
Steel manufacturer asking for slow down of plant due late delivery of cargo
Limit Affidavits:
Affidavits often drafted by Juniors in law firms;
Example of Seven Seas Affidavit – relating how the owner – a professional acquired ships, maintained them and prospered and why he sold the particular ship much after the cargo loss. Result lengthy cross examination extending over ten days and witness contradicting himself.
Questions 1 to 4: This type of questioning results from Counsel not doing home work and being pre-occupied with thinking the relevant questions while at the same time continuing with the cross examination.
Question 5: This type of questioning occurs because the lawyer does not take witness’ back ground into account and some times tries to over-awe or confuse the witness with legal jargon.