The document outlines the tasks and responsibilities for members of a CLC (Collaborative Learning Community) group project. It assigns group members to specific tasks like outlining the project, assigning sections to individuals, conducting research, proofreading, and submitting the final paper. It includes due dates for each task and guidelines for ensuring the group functions effectively through communication, respect, and timely completion of assignments. The document also includes a peer evaluation rubric for group members to rate each other.

1. CLC Course Information
(What needs to be undertaken to complete the CLC project?)
CLC Group Member’s Name
Task to be completed by this team member
Due date for completing the task for the CLC to review
Me
Contributing one or more ideas for how the project should be
completed
The project should be completed by ensuing maximum
teamwork among all the embers. We should have a meeting to
discuss the project requirement so that all the members can have
an equal understanding. The project will be divided into
different tasks to be handled individually by every member of
the team. After the completion of the different tasks, the
members should meet, discuss the different tasks and compile
them into one project. The team should use scholarly sources to
research and come up with a quality final project.
08-26-18
ZEENA
Outlining the CLC project
08-26-18
Me, Norma, Richard
Assigning tasks to CLC members
Breaking up the assignment into different sections for each team
member to contribute their share of work and all come together
in the end to compile it all on one submission.
8-27-18
Richard

2. Performing research on assigned topics and writing it up for
CLC members to review
When conducting research, we as a team must use known
sources, scholarly sources, by using the GCU library is a great
place to find information when doing assigned tasks, utilizing
the internet websites which have known sources for peered-
reviewed papers, abstracts and articles for example: .Edu, .org,
.gov. Figuring out what the topic is, understanding the
difference between what’s primary and secondary research is,
also what’s involved and when it needs to be completed the
timeline.
8-27-18
Norma
Making sure everyone meets their assigned deadlines for tasks
8-27-18
Richard
Proofreading and editing the paper
I will proofread the assignment once everyone’s part is all
completed and is all put into one assignment. The first thing I
will do is re-read over the completed assignment and catch any
errors, mis-spelling, and any out of the place content. Once that
is done I will do spell check by using the spelling and grammar
feature on Microsoft word. Also, I will ensure the text is all in
Times New Roman and the font is at 12 by what the GCU
requirement is.
8-28-18
Norma
Submitting the paper via the Assignments feature by the due
date deadline
8-28-18
Other:
Other:

3. CLC Group Interaction Guidelines- part 3
(
CLC Group Review Process –part 4
(What makes a CLC effective?)
What did our CLC do well this time?
What can we do to be a more effective CLC next time?
Timely completion of assignments, Inter-acted well using phone
numbers and emails
Everyone in the team can communicate the first day once the
assignment was clear to everyone of what is expected
Maintained respect among all the members of the team,
Everyone was so understanding and caring to work as a team
Of course, due to arising issues and problems which occur
during getting assignments completed and due to different
student’s schedules during their lives better time management
can be incorporated
Timely communication and solving of problems and issues,
Communicated online each team members phone numbers and
emails
Figuring out the Team Leader from the start will be more
effective
Effective review of the assignment progress, Reviewing every
day prior to submission
Submit more throughout the groups forum of the work on a
daily basis
March 15, 2013 Page 3 of 4

4. Peer Evaluation
Complete this peer evaluation for each member of your team,
including yourself. The average score from these evaluations
will be your grade for the assignment.
Rate each team member on a scale of 1 to 100 with 100 being
highest. Use the rubric on the second page to determine the
score for each team member. Include comments explaining why
you gave your teammate this score.
Your peer evaluations will be kept strictly confidential. Your
grade for the evaluation will be posted in the grade book as an
assignment, but individual ratings will not be shared.
Group Member: List Names
Rating: 1 – 100
Comments:
Must Be Completed for Each Team Member
1. Your name
2.
3.
4.

5. 5.
6.
After the total for each student has been added together, and
divided by the number of team members rating the student,
calculate the following: ___/100 x 10% =____ out of 10 points
for this evaluation.
Peer Evaluation Rubric:
CATEGORY
100-93 points (A) Excellent
92-83 points (B) Good
82-73 points
(C) Improving
72-0 points
(D) Needs Improvement
Contributions
Student routinely provides useful ideas when participating in
the group discussion. Student contributes a lot of effort.
Student usually provides useful ideas when participating in the
group discussion. Student is a good group member who tries
hard.
Student sometimes provides useful ideas when participating in
the group discussion. Student is a satisfactory group member
who does what is required.
Student rarely provides useful ideas when participating in the
group discussion. Student may refuse to participate.
Quality of Work
No correction or revision is necessary. Work is complete and of

6. high quality.
Revisions and corrections may not be necessary and work is
adequate for what is needed.
Some revision or correction is needed, or work is not always
completed in the manner required.
Work provided constantly needs correction and revision and is
often incomplete.
Time Management
All work is turned in on time or early. The team member is
reliable for posting/submitting whole pieces that the group has
put together, and responsibilities never need to be reassigned to
compensate.
Work is, for the most part, on time, and on a few occasions
early. For the most part, the team member is reliable for
submitting completed team documents, and responsibilities do
not need to be reassigned to compensate.
Occasionally the work is on time, and only rarely is it early. On
one or two occasions the rest of the group needs to compensate
for missing or late work. Comment by Chris Moore: Neither of
these cells actually provide for "late" work.
Occasionally the work is on time, but it is never early. Team
member cannot be relied on to turn in team documents, and
other members sometimes must compensate for tardiness of
work assigned.
Attitude
Student always has a positive attitude about the project and
works well with the other team members. Any criticism
provided by student is constructive.
Student usually has a positive attitude towards the work and the
group, and conflict is usually minor. Any criticism provided by
student is often constructive.
Attitude is hit or miss towards the project and the group, but
member is tolerable for the most part. Criticism provided by
student is on occasion constructive, if provided at all.
Student rarely has a positive attitude. Participation, quality of
work, and time management are severely affected by attitude

7. and team member has difficulties and conflict with group.
© 2017. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
2