3. • “New” articles fail to list publishing dates or
functional links
• No evidence of revision
• Most sources date back to early 80’s
4. • Very Little relevance to purpose
• The intended audience are other
white supremacists
• Fails to give unbiased
presentation of the issue
5. • Author is a member of a known white
supremacist group
• Author has no official qualifications to
discuss the topic at hand
• Very little if any contact information