NSG5002 Advanced Theoretical Perspectives Peer Presentation Review Checklist Template Criteria No. Checklist Check the boxes 1 Does the presentation include all the specified components? • A brief overview of the theorist’s background • Discussion of the theorist's view of the four basic metaparadigms and two concepts unique to the theory • Basic theoretical assertions or propositions • An analysis and a critique of the model with a focus on elaboration of the theory's implications for nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research 2 Does the presentation demonstrate focused research effort and good writing ability? 3 Does the presentation reflect an understanding of theory? 4 Is the presentation comprehensive? 5 Does the presentation reveal any content gaps? 6 Does the presentation effectively compile the specified packet of materials? 7 Does the posted packet include handouts, such as charts, diagrams, or definitions, which facilitate understanding of the presentation and the theory? 8 Is the presentation style impressive? 9 Does the presentation reflect organization and clarity? 10 Was the presentation submitted on time, and with correct spelling and grammar? 11 Does the presentation exhibit consistent and accurate adherence to APA standards? 12 Did the presenter have effective communication skills? Page 1 of 1 © 2006 South University .

1. NSG5002 Advanced Theoretical Perspectives
Peer Presentation Review Checklist Template
Criteria No. Checklist Check the
boxes
1 Does the presentation include all the specified
components?
• A brief overview of the theorist’s background
• Discussion of the theorist's view of the four basic
metaparadigms and two concepts unique to the
theory
• Basic theoretical assertions or propositions
• An analysis and a critique of the model with a focus
on elaboration of the theory's implications for
nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing
research
2 Does the presentation demonstrate focused research effort

2. and good writing ability?
3 Does the presentation reflect an understanding of theory?
4 Is the presentation comprehensive?
5 Does the presentation reveal any content gaps?
6 Does the presentation effectively compile the specified
packet of materials?
7 Does the posted packet include handouts, such as charts,
diagrams, or definitions, which facilitate understanding of
the presentation and the theory?
8 Is the presentation style impressive?
9 Does the presentation reflect organization and clarity?
10 Was the presentation submitted on time, and with correct
spelling and grammar?
11 Does the presentation exhibit consistent and accurate
adherence to APA standards?
12 Did the presenter have effective communication skills?

3. Page 1 of 1
© 2006 South University