The document discusses two narrative theories - Todorov's and Propp's. It analyzes a story based on Todorov's theory of equilibrium being disrupted and later restored. While the story has a hero, it lacks the other character types described in Propp's theory. Overall, the analysis finds Todorov's narrative structure a better fit for the story.

2. 1. Equilibrium - starts off being happy etc.
2. A Distribution – second part features a problem
3. Realisation – everyone realises the problem is chaos
4. Restored Order – characters attempt to restore the problem
5. Equilibrium – The story ends with everyone being happy

3. 1. The Hero – the character that seeks something
2. The Villan – character who blocks the heroes quest
3. The Donor – who provides an object with magical properties.
4. The Dispatcher – who sends the hero on his/her quest via a message.
5. The False Hero – who disrupts the hero’s success by making false claims.
6. The Helper – who aids the hero.
7. The Princess – acts as the reward for the hero and the object of the villain’s plots
8. Her Father – who acts to reward the hero for his effort.

4. FROM THE OVERALL LOOK AT THESE TWO NARRATIVE THEORIES, I THINK THAT OUR STORY IS MORE
LIKELY TO FIT WITH TODOROV'S NARRATIVE THEORIES. THIS IS BECAUSE A LOT OF OUR SCENES
MATCH HIS PATTERN. FOR EXAMPLE OUR STORY INCLUDES REALISATION AND RESTORED ORDER. THE
BEGINNING OF OUR PROJECT IS EQUILIBRIUM ALSO. AS WELL AS THIS, OUR STORY MAY LEAD ON TO
HAVE A EQUILIBRIUM ENDING. OUR STORY MAY HAVE A 'HERO' HOWEVER OUR PROJECT LACKS ANY
OTHER CHARACTER PROPP DESCRIBES.