This SLP has two parts.
Part I
Every company has capital projects. The company you have selected must need something! Be it a new wing to the building, a new product line to be funded, a new piece of equipment, find one new acquisition your company needs.
Once you have identified the new possible investment item, what problems are you going to have in estimating the cash flow that might be emanating from the initial investment and problems in getting it funded? Issues might be:
Risk
Cost
Politics (getting it through committees)
Public Relations
etc.,
Identify a potential capital project for your company describe such a project and write a short summary of the problems you see in getting the funding to see it through.
Part II
Examine the structure and activities in your organization and identify two projects or events that required an investment. One should be a 'current project' and the other long-term investment project.
For each project or event, identify the preferable source of funding. You may not have access to the actual source of funding so limit your paper to the source
YOU
feel is most appropriate. Then explain why you feel that source is most appropriate.
This is a Signature Assignment Expectation for FIN301 Module 4 SLP
There are 2 specific learning outcomes: 1) apply business theories, models, and concepts to guide analysis of problems and situations and 2) utilize data driven analysis in making business decisions.
In this SLP assignment for Module 4 our emphasis will be on understanding the preferable source of funding. You will be summarizing all of what you learned the in the Cases, SLPs and TDs.
The grading rubric below has been developed to measure student success in meeting the FIN301 Module 4 SLP expectations related to applying your knowledge of the source of funding on making business decisions.
Assignment Expectation
Weak
Marginal
Adequate
Strong
Organization
Demonstrates the ability to explain content logically, concisely, and in an appropriate manner to understanding of the source of funding.
There is no logical sequence of information. Wording is rambling and unfocused.
Paper does not follow a logical sequence.
Paper follows a logical sequence. There are some minor problems with sub-classification and/or results are not clear.
Paper follows a logical sequence with a correct computation and results. Each activity relates to others in a carefully organized framework.
Demonstrates the ability to support a central point or viewpoint throughout the paper.
Insufficient elaboration and/or support (e.g., computation, each source) in the paper.
Limited elaboration and/or support in the paper.
Support with some specific details and elaboration in the paper.
Support through both specific details and elaboration apparent in the paper.
Content
Demonstrates the ability to analyze the source of funding and compare equity with debt.
The purpose is not identified, is unclear, or inappropriate in the paper.
Purpose is occasio.
Historical philosophical, theoretical, and legal foundations of special and i...
This SLP has two parts.Part IEvery company has capital projects..docx
1. This SLP has two parts.
Part I
Every company has capital projects. The company you have
selected must need something! Be it a new wing to the building,
a new product line to be funded, a new piece of equipment, find
one new acquisition your company needs.
Once you have identified the new possible investment item,
what problems are you going to have in estimating the cash flow
that might be emanating from the initial investment and
problems in getting it funded? Issues might be:
Risk
Cost
Politics (getting it through committees)
Public Relations
etc.,
Identify a potential capital project for your company describe
such a project and write a short summary of the problems you
see in getting the funding to see it through.
Part II
Examine the structure and activities in your organization and
identify two projects or events that required an investment. One
should be a 'current project' and the other long-term investment
project.
For each project or event, identify the preferable source of
funding. You may not have access to the actual source of
funding so limit your paper to the source
YOU
feel is most appropriate. Then explain why you feel that source
is most appropriate.
This is a Signature Assignment Expectation for FIN301 Module
4 SLP
There are 2 specific learning outcomes: 1) apply business
theories, models, and concepts to guide analysis of problems
and situations and 2) utilize data driven analysis in making
business decisions.
2. In this SLP assignment for Module 4 our emphasis will be on
understanding the preferable source of funding. You will be
summarizing all of what you learned the in the Cases, SLPs and
TDs.
The grading rubric below has been developed to measure
student success in meeting the FIN301 Module 4 SLP
expectations related to applying your knowledge of the source
of funding on making business decisions.
Assignment Expectation
Weak
Marginal
Adequate
Strong
Organization
Demonstrates the ability to explain content logically, concisely,
and in an appropriate manner to understanding of the source of
funding.
There is no logical sequence of information. Wording is
rambling and unfocused.
Paper does not follow a logical sequence.
Paper follows a logical sequence. There are some minor
problems with sub-classification and/or results are not clear.
Paper follows a logical sequence with a correct computation and
results. Each activity relates to others in a carefully organized
framework.
Demonstrates the ability to support a central point or viewpoint
throughout the paper.
Insufficient elaboration and/or support (e.g., computation, each
source) in the paper.
Limited elaboration and/or support in the paper.
Support with some specific details and elaboration in the paper.
Support through both specific details and elaboration apparent
in the paper.
Content
Demonstrates the ability to analyze the source of funding and
3. compare equity with debt.
The purpose is not identified, is unclear, or inappropriate in the
paper.
Purpose is occasionally unclear in the paper.
Clear purpose, but not consistently sustained throughout the
paper.
Clear purpose sustained throughout the paper.
Demonstrates the ability to gather and sort financial information
and data on a particular investment activity.
Does not have a grasp of information and appropriate data.
Topic is poorly created. Supporting explanations are absent or
vague. Trite ideas and/or unclear wording reflect a lack of
understanding of topic.
Seems uncomfortable with information and data. Topic is
evident but with little or no elaboration.
Seems comfortable with the financial information and data.
Topic is evident with some supporting details.
Demonstrates full knowledge of the topic with explanation and
elaboration. The topic is well developed, effectively supported,
and appropriate for the assignment. Critical thinking is clearly
and creatively expressed. Data choices are well thought out.
Delivery
Demonstrates the ability to use appropriate word choice and
grammar in the paper.
There are many sentences with grammatical errors. Some
sentences are incomplete/halting, and/or vocabulary is
somewhat limited or inappropriate.
There are a few sentences that are complete and grammatical.
Word choice is not always appropriate for presentation.
Sentences are generally complete and grammatical, and they
flow together easily. With a few exceptions, words are chosen
for their precise meaning.
All sentences are complete and grammatical, and they flow
together easily. Words are chosen for their precise meaning.
Word choice illustrates grasp of content and enhances
explanation.
4. Demonstrates the ability to make an effective explanation
outline that is free from bias.
Words chosen for an explanation are inappropriate and exhibits
bias. Some readers may be confused.
Words chosen for the paper are free from bias with one or two
minor exceptions.
Words have no apparent bias. There is some inappropriate
explanation.
Words and explanation are completely free from bias.
SLP Assignment Expectations
For Part I, you must discuss both the estimates of the initial
investments and the annual incremental after-tax cash flow that
is expected to emanate from the investment.