course material

1. [From 10$/Pg] Stress Affect Polycystic Ovary
[From 10$/Pg] Stress Affect Polycystic OvaryCitation- PLEASE USE APATopic- how does
stress affect Polycystic ovary syndromeAim: The aim is to review a substantial body of
literature on a biobehavioral health topic and present a synthesis of current knowledge on
the subject. Special Considerations: The Narrative Review should not be formatted
following the IMRaD style. Students should identify a question of interest related to the
topic and determine an scope of the review. If a topic is quite broad, as many biobehavioral
health topics are, the student should limit the scope of the review to a substantive domain,
such as treatment or prevention, characteristics of the condition, health messages,
etc.Content & Organization: The question of interest should guide the scope and content of
the written paper. Students must identify relevant sub-topics within the broader topic and
organize the paper with logical, descriptive sections. All sections should be unified by a
common theme. Sections should be arranged in a logical order with meaningful transitions.
An abstract and references are required in addition to the other sections of the paper. For
example, a question of interest may be, “Can human genetic engineering offer hope in the
treatment of Huntington’s Disease.” In this case, the scope of the review should be limited to
genetic engineering and its application to Huntington’s Disease. Some logical sections
within the paper may be, Introduction to the Genetics of Huntington’s Disease; Animal
Models of Huntington’s Disease; Viral Vectors for Genetic Insertions; New Approaches and
Future Directions. Notice how these sections are within the scope of the question and are
unified by theme. Avoid topic sections that aren’t clearly within the scope of the question.
Some examples in this instance might be: Signs or Symptoms of Huntington’s Disease;
Incidence and Prevalence, Health Disparities in Huntington’s Disease, etc. The choice of
topics within the review will be unique to each student and topic.Requirements: The
Narrative/Literature Review must incorporate at least 30 relevant scholarly sources. An in-
depth discussion of the research from at least 10 of the cited sources must be incorporated
in the review. Additional suggestions for style and quality in a narrative review paper:A
logical progression across the major sections of the paper and a good use of support for
main arguments within each paragraph of each major section is critical for a well written
narrative review. A useful exercise to test the logical structure of your section headings is to
turn each major section of the paper into one or two main points that you want to make in
that section, then string all those sentences together into a big paragraph. If this makes
sense and there’s a good way to make transitions from one section to the next, you know
you’ve done a nice job. You can also use this as the abstract of the paper.It is also very

2. useful to study how other researchers write and organize review articles. One technique for
doing so is called reverse outlining. Try this method as you are getting started with your
own by choosing a relevant existing review article and following the instructions at this
webiste: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/689/1/This method can help you
identify how the “plot” of a scientific article builds up and moves from area to area in a
coherent way. Once you know what you want to do with the structure of your paper, be sure
to signal the audience consistently about what you’re doing and why in each section and
paragraph. Do this with section headings, quality topic sentences, and occasionally add
transition statements that explain how one section of writing builds a framework for the
next important part.