SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
DIANA RUGH JOHNSON, JD, CWLS
ADOPTION LAW & PRACTICE IN GEORGIA
STATE BAR OF GEORGIA
NOVEMBER 4, 2016
GEORGIA’S NEW
CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY
THE OLD CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY
 Child Protective Services Information System
(CPSIS)
 Classifications:
 Unfounded – no credible evidence that the alleged child abuse
occurred
 Confirmed – at least equal or greater credible evidence that the
child abuse occurred
 Unconfirmed – some credible evidence that the abuse
occurred, but not sufficient evidence to classify as confirmed
REMOVAL FROM THE OLD REGISTRY
 DFCS notified alleged abuser of report classification
 Right to hearing before Administrative Law Judge
 ALJ determined whether evidence met required
standard for the classification
 Alleged abuser not allowed to compel testimony from
a child under the age of 14
 ALJ decision appealable to Superior Court
 No appeal allowed from Superior Court’s ruling
STATE OF GEORGIA ET AL. V. BART JACKSON
 269 Ga. 308 (March 20, 1998)
 Bart Jackson received notice he was reported as a
confirmed child abuser
 Requested ALJ hearing
 Hearing postponed until conclusion of criminal case
re 5 counts of child molestation
 Jackson tried and acquitted of all 5 counts
 DFCS wanted to keep Jackson on CPSIS as a
confirmed abuser
STATE V. JACKSON, CONTINUED
 Jackson filed a challenge to the constitutionality of
O.C.G.A. § 49-5-183.1
 Jackson argument:
 Sixth Amendment right to compel witnesses on his behalf
 Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him
 State’s argument:
 Only reputational harm
 No deprivation of liberty
 Not entitled to Sixth Amendment protections
 Superior Court agreed with Jackson
 State appealed
STATE V. JACKSON, CONTINUED
 GA Supreme Court opinion:
 Jackson entitled to due process protections
 State infringement on due process must be narrowly tailored
to serve a compelling state interest
 State interest = welfare of children
 Prohibiting children <14 from being compelled to testify NOT
narrowly tailored to protect that State interest
 O.C.G.A. § 49-5-183.1 unconstitutional on its face
 No other arguments addressed
 O.C.G.A. § 49-5-180 – 187 later repealed
NEW CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY
 Effective July 1, 2016
 Investigator substantiates a case of child abuse or
neglect
 ≤30 days – notifies DFCS of the determination
 Alleged child abuser whose case is substantiated is
automatically entered in CPSIS
 DFCS notifies alleged abuser by certified mail
 Inclusion on registry
 Right to appeal determination
TIMELINES
 ≤10 days - written request for hearing to DFCS
 ≤10 days - DFCS transmits request to Office of State
Administrative Hearings (OSAH)
 ≥10 days of hearing - OSAH gives notice of time and
place of hearing by first class mail
 ≤30 days of receipt of request for hearing – OSAH
holds hearing
 Hearing can be postponed by mutual consent, for
good cause shown, or for appointment of counsel (if
alleged abuser <18)
OSAH HEARING
 Conducted in accordance with Georgia
Administrative Procedure Act
 Determination: whether child abuse was committed
by the alleged child abuser to justify the
investigator’s substantiation
 Doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel
apply
ALJ DECISION
 Within 5 business days
 If there is not a preponderance of evidence that the
alleged abuser committed the act of child abuse
 ALJ orders name removed from Child Abuse Registry
 ALJ decision = final administrative decision
 Georgia Administrative Procedure Act: either party
has right to judicial review
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ALJ DECISION
 Petition for review must be filed within 10 days
 Petition filed in Superior Court of County where
OSAH hearing was held
 If hearing was by telephone, file in Fulton County
Superior Court
 Superior Court conducts review
 Renders decision within 30 days of filing of petition
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ALJ DECISION
 O.C.G.A. § 50-13-19:
 No substitute of judgment as to the weight of the evidence
 Court may affirm, remand, reverse, or modify decision of agency
 Basis for reversal or modification: substantial rights of
appellant prejudiced by
 Administrative findings, inferences, conclusions that are…
 In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions
 In excess of statutory authority of the agency
 Made upon unlawful procedure
 Affected by other error of law
 Clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious
 Abuse of discretion or unwarranted exercise of discretion
 No statutory restriction on right to appeal Superior
Court’s decision
REMOVAL OF NAME FROM REGISTRY
 Minors
 At age 18
 After 1 year if no subsequent substantiated cases
 Upon showing of rehabilitation (by preponderance)
 Adults
 Mistake identity – no credible evidence that individual who
requested hearing is the individual who had a substantiated
case of child abuse
ACCESS TO REGISTRY INFORMATION
 General public excluded from OSAH child abuse
registry hearings
 Files and records relating to hearings confidential
and not subject to public inspection
 Misdemeanor to provide information to
unauthorized person
 Misdemeanor to obtain/attempt registry information
under false pretense
ACCESS TO REGISTRY INFORMATION
 Child abuse investigator for purpose of investigating
another case of alleged child abuse
 State or other government agencies which license
entities interacting/caring for children
 Licensed GA entities that interact/care for children –
for purpose of licensing/employment of a specific
individual
ACCESS TO REGISTRY INFORMATION
 Licensing entity who must provide written notice to
an applicant/licensed entity re denial/revocation of
license resulting from registry information
 Department of Early Care and Learning - to
compare to its individual records checks
 CASA – for screening of employees and volunteers
 Governor’s office, General Assembly, district
attorneys, and law enforcement – statistical info only
ACCESS FOR ADOPTION PURPOSES
 No access for licensed child-placing agencies
 Is my name on the registry?
 O.C.G.A. § 49-5-185(c)
 Government-issued picture ID as authorized under O.C.G.A. §
40-5-100 through 104
 DFCS shall disclose
 Whether individual’s name is included in registry
 Date name was added to registry
INDIVIDUAL SCREENING REQUESTS
 https://gacar.dhs.ga.gov/General/Home
INDIVIDUAL SCREENING REQUESTS
SCREENING REQUEST FORM
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM
(CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY) SCREENING REQUEST INFORMATION
This form is to request a screening to check if an individual is in the Child Protective Services Information System.
REQUESTOR’S ROLE
AGENCY REQUESTING SCREENING INFORMATION
NAME & JOB TITLE TEL # EMAIL ADDRESS
NAME OF AGENCY STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE
SCREENING RESULTS TO BE SENT TO:
NAME TEL # EMAIL ADDRESS
NAME OF AGENCY (If applicable) STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE
INFORMATION ON PERSON TO BE SCREENED (APPLICANT)
NAME/ALIAS (First, Middle, Last) TEL # EMAIL ADDRESS
MAIDEN NAME *If you have been married, you have to provide this
information.
OTHER NAMES USED IN PAST
CURRENT STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE COUNTY
DATE OF BIRTH SSN# (IF KNOWN) SEX
RACE ETHNICITY
SELF-SCREENING VALIDATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY DFCS STAFF MEMBER ONLY)
Please copy and upload Identification, and upload it along with this form.
IN ORDER TO VERIFY THAT YOU ARE THE REQUESTING AGENCY, PLEASE SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST ON
AGENCY LETTERHEAD ALONG WITH THIS FORM TO THE GEORGIA CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY. PLEASE SPECIFY IF
YOU ARE REQUESTING THE INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF LICENSING, EMPLOYMENT, OR A SPECIFIC
INDIVIDUAL.
SIGNATURE OF REQUESTOR DATE
NAME (First, Middle, Last) JOB TITLE DATE REQUEST WAS RECEIVED DATE REQUEST SUBMITTED
COUNTY VALIDATING IDENTIFICATION PHONE NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS ID VALIDATION
Driver’s License
Passport
Military ID
State ID
PLEASE CHECK ONLY ONE:
An individual who wants to check the registry to see whether or not his/her name is listed. (Please provide Driver’s License,
State ID, Passport, or Military ID)
A Georgia CPS investigator who has investigated or is investigating a case of possible child abuse who shall only be provided
information relating to that case for purposes of using that information in such investigation.
A state or government agency of this state or any other states, which license entities that have interactions with children or are
responsible for providing care for children, which shall only be provided information for purposes of licensing or employment of a
specific individual.
Licensed entities in this state, which interact with children or are responsible for providing care for children, which shall only be
provided information for purposes of licensing or employment of a specific individual.
DATE :
FORM MUST BE SUBMITTED IN PERSON
HISTORICAL INFORMATION MAINTAINED
 CPSIS limited to abuse substantiated on or after
July 1, 2016
 SHINES - Info on cases occurring before July 1, 2016
 O.C.G.A. § 49-5-41 regulates SHINES access
 Government entities responsible for protecting children from
abuse/neglect
 Court for determination of an issue before it
 Grand Jury, district attorney, solicitor general
 Any adult who makes report of abuse/neglect pursuant to
O.C.G.A. § 19-7-5 (limited access)
PROBLEMS & INCONSISTENCIES
 Statutory definitions of abuse/neglect in O.C.G.A. §
19-7-5(b)(4) ≠ with Georgia Maltreatment Codes
 Emotional abuse
 Family/domestic/intimate partner violence
 O.C.G.A. 49-5-183(a)(1) vs. (f)
 Automatic inclusion of alleged abuser’s name in child abuse
registry
 Filing of petition for review in Superior Court stays listing of
petitioner’s name in child abuse registry
PRACTICE POINTERS
 Misapplication of collateral estoppel or res judicata
 Lack of Juvenile Court finding regarding perpetrator
or the abuse
 Review investigator’s coding of alleged abuse
 Non-offending parent in sexual/physical abuse case
 Abandonment
 Cross-examine using Georgia Maltreatment Codes
 Rules of evidence
 Forensic interview summaries
 Medical evaluations
 Psychological evaluations
DIANA RUGH JOHNSON
RUGHJOHNSON@GMAIL.COM
QUESTIONS?

More Related Content

What's hot

10.5 relative non-relative care assessment
10.5 relative non-relative care assessment10.5 relative non-relative care assessment
10.5 relative non-relative care assessment
screaminc
 
Selecting and Prosecuting Police Liability
Selecting and Prosecuting Police LiabilitySelecting and Prosecuting Police Liability
Selecting and Prosecuting Police Liability
Alice Shikina
 
Kevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth Writing SampleKevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth
 

What's hot (18)

Georgia's Juvenile Code Revised - An Overview
Georgia's Juvenile Code Revised - An OverviewGeorgia's Juvenile Code Revised - An Overview
Georgia's Juvenile Code Revised - An Overview
 
Discretionary Appeals from Juvenile Court - TPR Cases
Discretionary Appeals from Juvenile Court - TPR CasesDiscretionary Appeals from Juvenile Court - TPR Cases
Discretionary Appeals from Juvenile Court - TPR Cases
 
Open Juvenile Courts in Georgia - SB 207
Open Juvenile Courts in Georgia - SB 207Open Juvenile Courts in Georgia - SB 207
Open Juvenile Courts in Georgia - SB 207
 
Final Divorce Order Halburn v. Halburn 11d-516 1/23/2013
Final Divorce Order Halburn v. Halburn 11d-516 1/23/2013Final Divorce Order Halburn v. Halburn 11d-516 1/23/2013
Final Divorce Order Halburn v. Halburn 11d-516 1/23/2013
 
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...
 
SIJ
SIJSIJ
SIJ
 
Cja 350 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 350 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comCja 350 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
Cja 350 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.com
 
What You Need to Know About Immigration in 2014 Workshop
What You Need to Know About Immigration in 2014 WorkshopWhat You Need to Know About Immigration in 2014 Workshop
What You Need to Know About Immigration in 2014 Workshop
 
10.5 relative non-relative care assessment
10.5 relative non-relative care assessment10.5 relative non-relative care assessment
10.5 relative non-relative care assessment
 
Basic Rights and Reporting Policy
Basic Rights and Reporting PolicyBasic Rights and Reporting Policy
Basic Rights and Reporting Policy
 
Open Juvenile Courts in Georgia
Open Juvenile Courts in GeorgiaOpen Juvenile Courts in Georgia
Open Juvenile Courts in Georgia
 
Resume Cronquist Esq
Resume Cronquist EsqResume Cronquist Esq
Resume Cronquist Esq
 
Ss 5
Ss 5Ss 5
Ss 5
 
Divorce, Child Support, Rape? An Introduction to California Courts
Divorce, Child Support, Rape? An Introduction to California CourtsDivorce, Child Support, Rape? An Introduction to California Courts
Divorce, Child Support, Rape? An Introduction to California Courts
 
Selecting and Prosecuting Police Liability
Selecting and Prosecuting Police LiabilitySelecting and Prosecuting Police Liability
Selecting and Prosecuting Police Liability
 
C:\fakepath\ss 5
C:\fakepath\ss 5C:\fakepath\ss 5
C:\fakepath\ss 5
 
Ss 5
Ss 5Ss 5
Ss 5
 
Kevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth Writing SampleKevin Firth Writing Sample
Kevin Firth Writing Sample
 

Similar to Georgia's New Child Abuse Registry

Legitimation packethenry
Legitimation packethenryLegitimation packethenry
Legitimation packethenry
screaminc
 
Divorce & Child Custody Issues
Divorce & Child Custody IssuesDivorce & Child Custody Issues
Divorce & Child Custody Issues
Fran Quarles
 
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
Karon Washburn Rowden
 
Background Check Results
Background Check ResultsBackground Check Results
Background Check Results
Taylor Meholick
 
Grandparents Rights Group
Grandparents Rights GroupGrandparents Rights Group
Grandparents Rights Group
guest7feee6
 

Similar to Georgia's New Child Abuse Registry (20)

Security id 2014
Security id 2014Security id 2014
Security id 2014
 
Fl100
Fl100Fl100
Fl100
 
Legitimation packethenry
Legitimation packethenryLegitimation packethenry
Legitimation packethenry
 
Divorce & Child Custody Issues
Divorce & Child Custody IssuesDivorce & Child Custody Issues
Divorce & Child Custody Issues
 
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
 
Background Check Results
Background Check ResultsBackground Check Results
Background Check Results
 
Executive action of november 20 2014 (English) As of 12 04-2014
Executive action of november 20 2014 (English) As of 12 04-2014Executive action of november 20 2014 (English) As of 12 04-2014
Executive action of november 20 2014 (English) As of 12 04-2014
 
Support procedures in philadelphia slideshow
Support procedures in philadelphia slideshowSupport procedures in philadelphia slideshow
Support procedures in philadelphia slideshow
 
Authorization For Release of Information
Authorization For Release of InformationAuthorization For Release of Information
Authorization For Release of Information
 
Criminal Summons.pdf
Criminal Summons.pdfCriminal Summons.pdf
Criminal Summons.pdf
 
Fs css-002 english
Fs css-002 englishFs css-002 english
Fs css-002 english
 
Fs css-002 english
Fs css-002 englishFs css-002 english
Fs css-002 english
 
Employment Screening Laws & Background Checks Question & Answer
Employment Screening Laws & Background Checks  Question & AnswerEmployment Screening Laws & Background Checks  Question & Answer
Employment Screening Laws & Background Checks Question & Answer
 
Expungement Presentation – Gang Intervention Conference
Expungement Presentation – Gang Intervention ConferenceExpungement Presentation – Gang Intervention Conference
Expungement Presentation – Gang Intervention Conference
 
Grandparents Rights Group
Grandparents Rights GroupGrandparents Rights Group
Grandparents Rights Group
 
Bashyam Spiro Llp Us Citizenship And Naturalization Webinar
Bashyam Spiro Llp   Us Citizenship And Naturalization WebinarBashyam Spiro Llp   Us Citizenship And Naturalization Webinar
Bashyam Spiro Llp Us Citizenship And Naturalization Webinar
 
Ij holmes simmons improper conduct
Ij holmes simmons improper conduct Ij holmes simmons improper conduct
Ij holmes simmons improper conduct
 
ds3053.pdf
ds3053.pdfds3053.pdf
ds3053.pdf
 
Background Report on Joshua Gabriel Spence in Seattle, 98117 WA.pdf
Background Report on Joshua Gabriel Spence in Seattle,  98117 WA.pdfBackground Report on Joshua Gabriel Spence in Seattle,  98117 WA.pdf
Background Report on Joshua Gabriel Spence in Seattle, 98117 WA.pdf
 
Jen Dritt Webinar - 1/10/13
Jen Dritt Webinar - 1/10/13Jen Dritt Webinar - 1/10/13
Jen Dritt Webinar - 1/10/13
 

More from bartoncenter

Hb242 delinqu comp_rev
Hb242 delinqu comp_revHb242 delinqu comp_rev
Hb242 delinqu comp_rev
bartoncenter
 

More from bartoncenter (20)

Reinstatement of Parental Rights as a Viable Permanency Option
Reinstatement of Parental Rights as a Viable Permanency Option Reinstatement of Parental Rights as a Viable Permanency Option
Reinstatement of Parental Rights as a Viable Permanency Option
 
Reinstating Parental Rights Over a Child That Has Lost Permanency
Reinstating Parental Rights Over a Child That Has Lost PermanencyReinstating Parental Rights Over a Child That Has Lost Permanency
Reinstating Parental Rights Over a Child That Has Lost Permanency
 
Children in Need of Services
Children in Need of ServicesChildren in Need of Services
Children in Need of Services
 
Covered Until 26
Covered Until 26Covered Until 26
Covered Until 26
 
Georgia Families 360
Georgia Families 360Georgia Families 360
Georgia Families 360
 
Guardianship_A_Willcott
Guardianship_A_WillcottGuardianship_A_Willcott
Guardianship_A_Willcott
 
Guardianship_D_Burrus
Guardianship_D_BurrusGuardianship_D_Burrus
Guardianship_D_Burrus
 
HIPAA Law
HIPAA LawHIPAA Law
HIPAA Law
 
Legal Remedies for Undocumented Children
Legal Remedies for Undocumented ChildrenLegal Remedies for Undocumented Children
Legal Remedies for Undocumented Children
 
Pregnancy Prevention in Foster Care
Pregnancy Prevention in Foster CarePregnancy Prevention in Foster Care
Pregnancy Prevention in Foster Care
 
Indian Child Welfare Act
Indian Child Welfare ActIndian Child Welfare Act
Indian Child Welfare Act
 
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in Georgia
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in GeorgiaReinstatement of Parental Rights in Georgia
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in Georgia
 
Concurrent Planning
Concurrent PlanningConcurrent Planning
Concurrent Planning
 
Making reasonable efforts through effective case planning
Making reasonable efforts through effective case planningMaking reasonable efforts through effective case planning
Making reasonable efforts through effective case planning
 
GA DFCS Community Programs Unit
GA DFCS Community Programs UnitGA DFCS Community Programs Unit
GA DFCS Community Programs Unit
 
GA DFCS Child Welfare Policy Manual Chapter 13: Independent Living Program
GA DFCS Child Welfare Policy Manual Chapter 13: Independent Living ProgramGA DFCS Child Welfare Policy Manual Chapter 13: Independent Living Program
GA DFCS Child Welfare Policy Manual Chapter 13: Independent Living Program
 
Confidentiality, Transparency, and Accountability: A Delicate Balance in Chil...
Confidentiality, Transparency, and Accountability: A Delicate Balance in Chil...Confidentiality, Transparency, and Accountability: A Delicate Balance in Chil...
Confidentiality, Transparency, and Accountability: A Delicate Balance in Chil...
 
Child's Right to Counsel in Dependency Proceedings
Child's Right to Counsel in Dependency ProceedingsChild's Right to Counsel in Dependency Proceedings
Child's Right to Counsel in Dependency Proceedings
 
Revitalizing the Code: Delinquency & Competency
Revitalizing the Code: Delinquency & CompetencyRevitalizing the Code: Delinquency & Competency
Revitalizing the Code: Delinquency & Competency
 
Hb242 delinqu comp_rev
Hb242 delinqu comp_revHb242 delinqu comp_rev
Hb242 delinqu comp_rev
 

Recently uploaded

一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
ss
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
bd2c5966a56d
 
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版(Griffith毕业证书)格里菲斯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Griffith毕业证书)格里菲斯大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Griffith毕业证书)格里菲斯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Griffith毕业证书)格里菲斯大学毕业证如何办理
bd2c5966a56d
 
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSSASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
CssSpamx
 
一比一原版(TheAuckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(TheAuckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(TheAuckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(TheAuckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证如何办理
F La
 
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.pptCode_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
JosephCanama
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
Fir La
 
一比一原版(纽大毕业证书)美国纽约大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(纽大毕业证书)美国纽约大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(纽大毕业证书)美国纽约大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(纽大毕业证书)美国纽约大学毕业证如何办理
e9733fc35af6
 
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
e9733fc35af6
 

Recently uploaded (20)

一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
 
Cyber Laws : National and International Perspective.
Cyber Laws : National and International Perspective.Cyber Laws : National and International Perspective.
Cyber Laws : National and International Perspective.
 
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy Novices
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy NovicesIt’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy Novices
It’s Not Easy Being Green: Ethical Pitfalls for Bankruptcy Novices
 
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(Griffith毕业证书)格里菲斯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Griffith毕业证书)格里菲斯大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Griffith毕业证书)格里菲斯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Griffith毕业证书)格里菲斯大学毕业证如何办理
 
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSSASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
ASMA JILANI EXPLAINED CASE PLD 1972 FOR CSS
 
Career As Legal Reporters for Law Students
Career As Legal Reporters for Law StudentsCareer As Legal Reporters for Law Students
Career As Legal Reporters for Law Students
 
一比一原版(TheAuckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(TheAuckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(TheAuckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(TheAuckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证如何办理
 
Understanding the Role of Labor Unions and Collective Bargaining
Understanding the Role of Labor Unions and Collective BargainingUnderstanding the Role of Labor Unions and Collective Bargaining
Understanding the Role of Labor Unions and Collective Bargaining
 
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.pptCode_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
 
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURYA SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
A SHORT HISTORY OF LIBERTY'S PROGREE THROUGH HE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
 
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdfRelationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
 
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
 
Elective Course on Forensic Science in Law
Elective Course on Forensic Science  in LawElective Course on Forensic Science  in Law
Elective Course on Forensic Science in Law
 
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Warwick毕业证书)华威大学毕业证如何办理
 
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam TakersPhilippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
Philippine FIRE CODE REVIEWER for Architecture Board Exam Takers
 
一比一原版(纽大毕业证书)美国纽约大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(纽大毕业证书)美国纽约大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(纽大毕业证书)美国纽约大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(纽大毕业证书)美国纽约大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
 

Georgia's New Child Abuse Registry

  • 1. DIANA RUGH JOHNSON, JD, CWLS ADOPTION LAW & PRACTICE IN GEORGIA STATE BAR OF GEORGIA NOVEMBER 4, 2016 GEORGIA’S NEW CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY
  • 2. THE OLD CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY  Child Protective Services Information System (CPSIS)  Classifications:  Unfounded – no credible evidence that the alleged child abuse occurred  Confirmed – at least equal or greater credible evidence that the child abuse occurred  Unconfirmed – some credible evidence that the abuse occurred, but not sufficient evidence to classify as confirmed
  • 3. REMOVAL FROM THE OLD REGISTRY  DFCS notified alleged abuser of report classification  Right to hearing before Administrative Law Judge  ALJ determined whether evidence met required standard for the classification  Alleged abuser not allowed to compel testimony from a child under the age of 14  ALJ decision appealable to Superior Court  No appeal allowed from Superior Court’s ruling
  • 4. STATE OF GEORGIA ET AL. V. BART JACKSON  269 Ga. 308 (March 20, 1998)  Bart Jackson received notice he was reported as a confirmed child abuser  Requested ALJ hearing  Hearing postponed until conclusion of criminal case re 5 counts of child molestation  Jackson tried and acquitted of all 5 counts  DFCS wanted to keep Jackson on CPSIS as a confirmed abuser
  • 5. STATE V. JACKSON, CONTINUED  Jackson filed a challenge to the constitutionality of O.C.G.A. § 49-5-183.1  Jackson argument:  Sixth Amendment right to compel witnesses on his behalf  Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him  State’s argument:  Only reputational harm  No deprivation of liberty  Not entitled to Sixth Amendment protections  Superior Court agreed with Jackson  State appealed
  • 6. STATE V. JACKSON, CONTINUED  GA Supreme Court opinion:  Jackson entitled to due process protections  State infringement on due process must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest  State interest = welfare of children  Prohibiting children <14 from being compelled to testify NOT narrowly tailored to protect that State interest  O.C.G.A. § 49-5-183.1 unconstitutional on its face  No other arguments addressed  O.C.G.A. § 49-5-180 – 187 later repealed
  • 7. NEW CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY  Effective July 1, 2016  Investigator substantiates a case of child abuse or neglect  ≤30 days – notifies DFCS of the determination  Alleged child abuser whose case is substantiated is automatically entered in CPSIS  DFCS notifies alleged abuser by certified mail  Inclusion on registry  Right to appeal determination
  • 8. TIMELINES  ≤10 days - written request for hearing to DFCS  ≤10 days - DFCS transmits request to Office of State Administrative Hearings (OSAH)  ≥10 days of hearing - OSAH gives notice of time and place of hearing by first class mail  ≤30 days of receipt of request for hearing – OSAH holds hearing  Hearing can be postponed by mutual consent, for good cause shown, or for appointment of counsel (if alleged abuser <18)
  • 9. OSAH HEARING  Conducted in accordance with Georgia Administrative Procedure Act  Determination: whether child abuse was committed by the alleged child abuser to justify the investigator’s substantiation  Doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply
  • 10. ALJ DECISION  Within 5 business days  If there is not a preponderance of evidence that the alleged abuser committed the act of child abuse  ALJ orders name removed from Child Abuse Registry  ALJ decision = final administrative decision  Georgia Administrative Procedure Act: either party has right to judicial review
  • 11. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ALJ DECISION  Petition for review must be filed within 10 days  Petition filed in Superior Court of County where OSAH hearing was held  If hearing was by telephone, file in Fulton County Superior Court  Superior Court conducts review  Renders decision within 30 days of filing of petition
  • 12. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ALJ DECISION  O.C.G.A. § 50-13-19:  No substitute of judgment as to the weight of the evidence  Court may affirm, remand, reverse, or modify decision of agency  Basis for reversal or modification: substantial rights of appellant prejudiced by  Administrative findings, inferences, conclusions that are…  In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions  In excess of statutory authority of the agency  Made upon unlawful procedure  Affected by other error of law  Clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious  Abuse of discretion or unwarranted exercise of discretion  No statutory restriction on right to appeal Superior Court’s decision
  • 13. REMOVAL OF NAME FROM REGISTRY  Minors  At age 18  After 1 year if no subsequent substantiated cases  Upon showing of rehabilitation (by preponderance)  Adults  Mistake identity – no credible evidence that individual who requested hearing is the individual who had a substantiated case of child abuse
  • 14. ACCESS TO REGISTRY INFORMATION  General public excluded from OSAH child abuse registry hearings  Files and records relating to hearings confidential and not subject to public inspection  Misdemeanor to provide information to unauthorized person  Misdemeanor to obtain/attempt registry information under false pretense
  • 15. ACCESS TO REGISTRY INFORMATION  Child abuse investigator for purpose of investigating another case of alleged child abuse  State or other government agencies which license entities interacting/caring for children  Licensed GA entities that interact/care for children – for purpose of licensing/employment of a specific individual
  • 16. ACCESS TO REGISTRY INFORMATION  Licensing entity who must provide written notice to an applicant/licensed entity re denial/revocation of license resulting from registry information  Department of Early Care and Learning - to compare to its individual records checks  CASA – for screening of employees and volunteers  Governor’s office, General Assembly, district attorneys, and law enforcement – statistical info only
  • 17. ACCESS FOR ADOPTION PURPOSES  No access for licensed child-placing agencies  Is my name on the registry?  O.C.G.A. § 49-5-185(c)  Government-issued picture ID as authorized under O.C.G.A. § 40-5-100 through 104  DFCS shall disclose  Whether individual’s name is included in registry  Date name was added to registry
  • 18. INDIVIDUAL SCREENING REQUESTS  https://gacar.dhs.ga.gov/General/Home
  • 20. SCREENING REQUEST FORM CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM (CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY) SCREENING REQUEST INFORMATION This form is to request a screening to check if an individual is in the Child Protective Services Information System. REQUESTOR’S ROLE AGENCY REQUESTING SCREENING INFORMATION NAME & JOB TITLE TEL # EMAIL ADDRESS NAME OF AGENCY STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE SCREENING RESULTS TO BE SENT TO: NAME TEL # EMAIL ADDRESS NAME OF AGENCY (If applicable) STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE INFORMATION ON PERSON TO BE SCREENED (APPLICANT) NAME/ALIAS (First, Middle, Last) TEL # EMAIL ADDRESS MAIDEN NAME *If you have been married, you have to provide this information. OTHER NAMES USED IN PAST CURRENT STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE COUNTY DATE OF BIRTH SSN# (IF KNOWN) SEX RACE ETHNICITY SELF-SCREENING VALIDATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY DFCS STAFF MEMBER ONLY) Please copy and upload Identification, and upload it along with this form. IN ORDER TO VERIFY THAT YOU ARE THE REQUESTING AGENCY, PLEASE SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST ON AGENCY LETTERHEAD ALONG WITH THIS FORM TO THE GEORGIA CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY. PLEASE SPECIFY IF YOU ARE REQUESTING THE INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF LICENSING, EMPLOYMENT, OR A SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL. SIGNATURE OF REQUESTOR DATE NAME (First, Middle, Last) JOB TITLE DATE REQUEST WAS RECEIVED DATE REQUEST SUBMITTED COUNTY VALIDATING IDENTIFICATION PHONE NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS ID VALIDATION Driver’s License Passport Military ID State ID PLEASE CHECK ONLY ONE: An individual who wants to check the registry to see whether or not his/her name is listed. (Please provide Driver’s License, State ID, Passport, or Military ID) A Georgia CPS investigator who has investigated or is investigating a case of possible child abuse who shall only be provided information relating to that case for purposes of using that information in such investigation. A state or government agency of this state or any other states, which license entities that have interactions with children or are responsible for providing care for children, which shall only be provided information for purposes of licensing or employment of a specific individual. Licensed entities in this state, which interact with children or are responsible for providing care for children, which shall only be provided information for purposes of licensing or employment of a specific individual. DATE :
  • 21. FORM MUST BE SUBMITTED IN PERSON
  • 22. HISTORICAL INFORMATION MAINTAINED  CPSIS limited to abuse substantiated on or after July 1, 2016  SHINES - Info on cases occurring before July 1, 2016  O.C.G.A. § 49-5-41 regulates SHINES access  Government entities responsible for protecting children from abuse/neglect  Court for determination of an issue before it  Grand Jury, district attorney, solicitor general  Any adult who makes report of abuse/neglect pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 19-7-5 (limited access)
  • 23. PROBLEMS & INCONSISTENCIES  Statutory definitions of abuse/neglect in O.C.G.A. § 19-7-5(b)(4) ≠ with Georgia Maltreatment Codes  Emotional abuse  Family/domestic/intimate partner violence  O.C.G.A. 49-5-183(a)(1) vs. (f)  Automatic inclusion of alleged abuser’s name in child abuse registry  Filing of petition for review in Superior Court stays listing of petitioner’s name in child abuse registry
  • 24. PRACTICE POINTERS  Misapplication of collateral estoppel or res judicata  Lack of Juvenile Court finding regarding perpetrator or the abuse  Review investigator’s coding of alleged abuse  Non-offending parent in sexual/physical abuse case  Abandonment  Cross-examine using Georgia Maltreatment Codes  Rules of evidence  Forensic interview summaries  Medical evaluations  Psychological evaluations

Editor's Notes

  1. 3 classifications – confusing -Unfounded -Confirmed -Unconfirmed
  2. -DFCS notified alleged abuser of outcome of investigation -Right to hearing before ALJ -ALJ determined whether the evidence met the confusing standard for classifiction -Alleged abuser could call witnesses -Not a child under age 14 -ALJ’s decision could be appealed to Superior Court -No further appeal allowed
  3. -Bart Jackson accused of child molestation -Received notice that DFCS classified him as a confirmed child abuser -Requested ALJ hearing -Hearing postponed until criminal case finished -5 counts of child molestation -Tried & acquitted of all 5 counts -DFCS wanted to keep Jackson on the registry
  4. -Jackson filed in Superior Court – challenge of constitutionality of 49-5-183.1 -Jackson challenged prohibition against compelling testimony of child witness <14: -Prohibition violated 6th amendment right to due process -State: -Not trying to lock you up -6th amendment protections don’t apply -Superior Court agreed with Jackson -State appealed
  5. -GA Supreme Court agreed with Superior Court -Jackson entitled to due process protections -49-5-183.1 unconstitutional on its face -49-5-180 through 187 later repealed
  6. -New Registry -Doesn’t prohibit compelling testimony by witnesses under 14 -Violates due process in other ways -Hopefully will soon be challenged -Placement on registry based on SUBSTANTIATED case of child abuse/neglect -Notification = determination letter -By certified mail -Inclusion on registry -Right to appeal determination
  7. -10 days to request hearing -Request goes to DFCS -DFCS informs Office of State Administrative Hearings (OSAH) -OSAH scheduled hearing w/in 30 days -Give at least 10 days notice -Hearings can be postponed -Mutual consent -Appointment of counsel (for minor)
  8. -Hearing is a real evidentiary hearing -No hearsay -Rules of evidence apply -Evidentiary standard = preponderance of the evidence -Res judicata & collateral estoppel apply -Adjudicated in Juvenile Court – tough fight -Clear and convincing evidence
  9. -Written decision w/in 5 business days -Evidence fell short = order will say remove from registry -ALJ decision = final administrative decision -Either party can request judicial review
  10. -Petition for Judicial Review filed w/in 10 days -Superior Court of County where hearing took place -If phone = Fulton County Superior Court -Superior Court conducts review -Decision w/in 30 days of filing of petition
  11. -Superior Court can’t reweigh the evidence -Options: affirm, remand, reverse, or modify -Basis for reversal or modification – on slide -Further appeals allowed
  12. -Minors removed at 18 -After 1 year if no more substantiated cases -Upon showing of rehabilitation -Adults -Only for mistaken identity -Not because you won your Juv Court or Criminal Case
  13. -Hearings and files are confidential -Unauthorized release, access, or attempted access = misdemeanor
  14. -Mostly for licensing purposes -Licensing of entities or individuals -ICPC access is being allowed – although not specifically stated in the statute
  15. -Also Dept of Early Care and Learning -CASA -Yearly statistical reports to the Governor’s office, prosecutors, law enforcement
  16. -No access for license child placing agencies -Prospective adoptive parent whose agency requires verification of a child abuse registry search -Must make individual request to DFCS to verify name not on registry -DFCS required to say yes or no -If yes, date name was added to registry -Doesn’t say anything about the reason or identity of alleged victim
  17. Paper – procedure still a mystery Jim took the deep dive and ran down the answer
  18. -Child abuse registry isn’t the only source of information on substantiated cases -SHINES system still in place -Still used to check history CPS history for all kinds of reasons
  19. -49-5-180(5) says for registry purposes, “child abuse” has the same meaning as in 19-7-5(b)(4) -19-7-5-(b)(4) defines child abuse as -Physical injury or death inflicted upon a child by a parent or caretaker thereof by other than accidental means; provided, however, that physical forms of discipline may be used as long as there is no physical injury to the child; -Neglect or exploitation of a child by a parent or caretaker thereof; -Sexual abuse of a child -Sexual exploitation of a child -DFCS substantiates cases for emotional abuse -Juvenile Court adjudicates children dependent for emotional abuse -Emotional abuse is defined in the Juvenile Code -Can’t put you on the registry because it’s not in 19-7-5-(b)(4) -Similar problem for subjecting a child to domestic violence where the child isn’t actually physically injured -That can land your child in foster care -Won’t land you on the child abuse registry -Alleged abuser’s name is automatically included on the registry – petition to get name taken off -But 49-5-183(f) says filing a petition for review in Superior Court STAYS LISTING OF PETITIONER’S NAME ON CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY
  20. -Collateral estoppel/res judicata -Identity of parties, cause of action, -Prior adjudication by court of competent jurisdiction -Full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues in the first action -If alleged abuser was a non-parent or a putative father -Not party -No opportunity to litigate -Dependency focuses on needs of the child regardless of parental fault -Child may be found dependent -Court doesn’t always make a factual finding about who is at fault -Ex: unexplained injury can = dependency w/no finding of fault -Review coding of alleged abuse -Substantiated for abandonment – code requires 6mos -Coding physical abuse against parent when abuse was inflicted by other parent or non-parent -Cross-examine using Georgia Maltreatment Codes -Very detailed descriptions of elements that make up kinds of abuse or neglect -Investigators don’t always pay attention to those details -Rules of Evidence -Investigators testifying re information given to them by another person -These investigators are used to testifying at Preliminary Protective Hearings (hearsay is allowed) -Beware of written evaluations and summaries -Written summaries of forensic interviews -Medical evaluations -Psychological evaluations -ALJs are taking these hearings very seriously -Details matter -Rules of evidence matter -Also witness lists, hearing start times