1.Summary: Read The CEO of Starbucks and the Practice of Ethical Leadership and complete the questions at the end of the case study Plz click the link you got questions Like this 1. Creating Community:  Did Johnson use Starbucks’ shared values as the cornerstone of his decision making after the arrests?  Did his decision to close all Starbucks stores for unconscious bias training and to create a new “Third Space Policy” align with Starbucks’ mission and goals?  Did his handling of the incident promote positive relationships between employees and customers? Did it encourage a sense of connectedness and shared values? 1. Encouraging Ethical Conduct:  Did Johnson openly acknowledge that his decision was based in ethics and morality?  Did his apology and actions promote awareness of an ethical issue? Did it create a positive or negative difference in the communities Starbucks serves? Did it make a positive or negative difference for Starbucks employees and customers? 1. Showing Discipline in One’s Role:  Does Johnson explicitly accept responsibility for the incident and provide direction for a course correction? Does he identify ways to collaborate with others when necessary?  Does he show he understands what his role is in fixing this problem? 1. Clarifying Culture:  Did Johnson clarify his values and the company’s values in his apology and with his subsequent actions?  Did Johnson’s apology and follow-up actions uphold Starbucks’ mission and core values? Did he identify gaps between stated and actual values?  Did Johnson’s apology help Starbucks employees figure out if their personal values align with the company’s? 1. Designing Ethical Systems:  Did Johnson’s actions have impact beyond Starbucks?  Did they sent a precedent for other companies to follow? Did his apology create a conversation about unconscious bias in the workplace? How do his apology and the subsequent follow-up actions compare to other companies and CEOs that have faced similar problems? 2nd question Journal article Journal article I need two copys Summary: Pick one of the following terms for your research: Morals, principles, values, corporate social responsibility, or ethical culture. Plz follow this instructions DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement. SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the 150-200 word range. Be sure to note the article's author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term. DISCUSSION: Using 300-350 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment. REFERENCES: All refer ...

1. 1.Summary:
Read The CEO of Starbucks and the Practice of Ethical
Leadership and complete the questions at the end of the case
study
Plz click the link you got questions
Like this
1. Creating Community: Did Johnson use Starbucks’ shared
values as the cornerstone of his decision making after the
arrests? Did his decision to close all Starbucks stores for
unconscious bias training and to create a new “Third Space
Policy” align with Starbucks’ mission and goals? Did his
handling of the incident promote positive relationships between
employees and customers? Did it encourage a sense of
connectedness and shared values?
1. Encouraging Ethical Conduct: Did Johnson openly
acknowledge that his decision was based in ethics and morality?
Did his apology and actions promote awareness of an ethical
issue? Did it create a positive or negative difference in the
communities Starbucks serves? Did it make a positive or
negative difference for Starbucks employees and customers?
1. Showing Discipline in One’s Role: Does Johnson explicitly
accept responsibility for the incident and provide direction for a
course correction? Does he identify ways to collaborate with
others when necessary? Does he show he understands what his
role is in fixing this problem?
1. Clarifying Culture: Did Johnson clarify his values and the
company’s values in his apology and with his subsequent
actions? Did Johnson’s apology and follow-up actions uphold
Starbucks’ mission and core values? Did he identify gaps
between stated and actual values? Did Johnson’s apology help

2. Starbucks employees figure out if their personal values align
with the company’s?
1. Designing Ethical Systems: Did Johnson’s actions have
impact beyond Starbucks? Did they sent a precedent for other
companies to follow? Did his apology create a conversation
about unconscious bias in the workplace? How do his apology
and the subsequent follow-up actions compare to other
companies and CEOs that have faced similar problems?
2nd question
Journal article
Journal article I need two copys
Summary:
Pick one of the following terms for your research: Morals,
principles, values, corporate social responsibility, or ethical
culture.
Plz follow this instructions
DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the
APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word
requirement. SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own
words- this should be in the 150-200 word range. Be sure to
note the article's author, note their credentials and why we
should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or
findings regarding the key term. DISCUSSION: Using 300-350
words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the
article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is
not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the
opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences,
thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the
assignment. REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the
bottom of the submission--in APA format.
```````````````````````````````--------------------------------------------
-------------------
3rd question

3. Summary:
Read Google's Handling of the "Echo Chamber Manifesto" and
complete the questions at the end of the case study.
Plz click the link you got questions
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
```````````````````````````
4th question
Summary:
Pick one of the following terms for your research: Stakeholder,
corporate citizenship, reputation, corporate governance, or
executive compensation.
Journal article I need two copys
Plz follow this instructions
DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the
APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word
requirement. SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own
words- this should be in the 150-200 word range. Be sure to
note the article's author, note their credentials and why we
should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or
findings regarding the key term. DISCUSSION: Using 300-350
words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the
article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is
not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the
opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences,
thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the
assignment. REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the
bottom of the submission--in APA format.
5th question
Summary:
Read Wells Fargo Banking Scandal and complete the questions
at the end of the case study.
Plz click the link you got questions
````````````````````-------------------------------------------------------

4. -------
6th question
Summary:
Pick one of the following terms for your research: Integrity,
ethical dilemma, conflict of interest, bribery, or fraud.
Journal article I need two copys
Plz follow this instructions
DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the
APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word
requirement. SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own
words- this should be in the 150-200 word range. Be sure to
note the article's author, note their credentials and why we
should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or
findings regarding the key term. DISCUSSION: Using 300-350
words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the
article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is
not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the
opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences,
thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the
assignment. REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the
bottom of the submission--in APA format.
1.
Summary
:
Read
The CEO of Starbucks and the Practice of Ethical Leadership
and complete the questions
at the end of

5. the case study
P
lz
click the link you got questions
L
ike
this
1.
Creating Community:
Did Johnson use Starbucks’ shared values as the
cornerstone of his decision making after the arrests?
Did his decision to
close all Starbucks stores for unconscious bias training and to
create a new
“Third Space Policy
” align with Starbucks’ mission and goals?
Did his
handling of the incident promote positive relationships between
employees and customers? Did it encourage a sense of
connectedness
and shared values?
1.
Encouraging Ethical Conduct:

6. Did Johnson openly ack
nowledge that his
decision was based in ethics and morality?
Did his apology and actions
promote awareness of an ethical issue? Did it create a positive
or negative
difference in the communities Starbucks serves? Did it make a
positive or
negative differe
nce for Starbucks employees and customers?
1.
Showing Discipline in One’s Role:
Does Johnson explicitly accept
responsibility for the incident and provide direction for a course
correction? Does he identify ways to collaborate with others
when
necessary?
Does he show he understands what his role is in fixing this
problem?
1.
Clarifying Culture:
Did Johnson clarify his values and the company’s values
in his apology and with his subsequent actions?

7. Did Johnson’s apology
and follow
-
up actions uphold Starbuck
s’ mission and core values? Did he
identify gaps between stated and actual values?
Did Johnson’s apology
help Starbucks employees figure out if their personal values
align with the
company’s?
IT 549 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Employing information assurance best practices will ensure a
firm is able to eliminate hierarchical structures, become more f
lat, and have greater customer touch
points by leveraging the correct information at the right time.
Successful firms will maintain an established information
assurance plan and posture that is
implemented and reviewed on a weekly basis.
The ability to properly assign roles is crucial to the design of an
effective information assurance pla n. Without clearly identified
roles and responsibilities, the key
members of an organization would not have a clear
understanding of what was expected of them. The establishment
of roles and responsibilities assists each
member to communicate clearly and effectively throughout the
organization.
Prompt: In Module Four, you will submit your roles and

8. responsibilities portion of the final project. Your submission
should answer the following questions: Who
are the key leaders of the organization specific to how their
responsibilities are connected to the security of the
organization’s information ? You must also
identify key ethical considerations. What are the ramifications
of key leaders not properly accounting for ethical and legal
considerations? What are t he key
components of information assurance as they relate to
individual roles and responsibilities within t he information
assurance plan? For example, examine the
current policies as they relate to confidentiality, integrity, and
availability of information.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
II. Information Security Roles and Responsibilities
a) Analyze the role of the key leaders within the organization
specific to how their responsibilities are connected to the
security of the organization’s
information. What is the relationship between these roles?
b) Evaluate key ethical and legal considerations related to
information assurance that must be taken into account by the
key lea ders within the
organization. What are the ramifications of key leaders not
properly accounting for ethical and legal considerations?
c) What are the key components of information assurance as
they relate to individual roles and responsibilities within the
infor mation assurance
plan? For example, examine the current policies as they relate
to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information.

9. Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a
two- to three-page Microsoft Word document with double
spacing, 12-point Times New Roman
font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA
format.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%)
Not Evident (0%) Value
Responsibilities of Key
Leaders
Anal yzes the rol e of the key
l eaders wi thi n the organi zati on
s peci fi c to how thei r
res pons i bi lities are connected to
the s ecuri ty of the organi zati on’s
i nformati on
Anal yzes the rol e of the key
l eaders wi thi n the organi zati on
but mi s s es key rol es or as pects of
res pons i bi lities s peci fic to the
s ecuri ty of the organi zati on’s
i nformati on

10. Does not anal yze the rol e of the
key l eaders wi thi n the
organi zati on
30
Key Ethical and Legal
Considerations
Accuratel y eval uates key ethi cal
and l egal cons i derations rel ated
to i nformati on as s urance that
mus t be taken i nto account by
the key l eaders wi thi n the
organi zati on, i ncluding the
rami fi cati ons of key l eaders not
properl y accounti ng for ethi cal
and l egal cons i derations
Eval uates ethi cal and l egal
cons i derati ons rel ated to
i nformati on as s urance that mus t
be taken i nto account by the key
l eaders wi thi n the organi zati on
but does not i ncl ude the
rami fi cati ons of key l eaders not
properl y accounti ng for ethi cal
and l egal cons i derations , or
eval uati on i s i naccurate

11. Does not eval uate ethi cal and
l egal cons i derati ons rel ated to
i nformati on as s urance that mus t
be taken i nto account by the key
l eaders wi thi n the organi zati on
30
Key Components of
Information Assurance
Comprehens i vel y addres s es
components of i nformati on
as s urance as they rel ate to
i ndi vi dual roles and
res pons i bi lities wi thi n the
i nformati on as s urance pl an
Addres s es components of
i nformati on as s urance as they
rel ate to i ndi vi dual roles and
res pons i bi lities wi thi n the
i nformati on as s urance pl an but
does not addres s confi denti al ity,
i ntegri ty, and/or avai lability of
i nformati on
Does not addres s any
components of i nformati on
as s urance as they rel ate to
i ndi vi dual roles and

12. res pons i bi lities wi thi n the
i nformati on as s urance pl an
30
Articulation of
Response
Submi s s i on has no major errors
rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar,
s pel l i ng, s yntax, or organi zati on
Submi s s i on has major errors
rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar,
s pel l i ng, s yntax, or organi zati on
that negati vel y i mpact readabi lity
and arti cul ation of mai n i deas
Submi s s i on has criti cal errors
rel ated to ci tati ons , grammar,
s pel l i ng, s yntax, or organi zati on
that prevent unders tandi ng of
i deas
10
Earned Total 100%