Response 3 My scores was 15, 14, 13, 14, 15, 15 Strength :- I consider my greatest strength as Empathy. It is because I have the ability to feel and understand other's pain or emotions. Example :- As I work in a company, I have many people around me all the times. Sometimes due to my quality, my co employees come and discuss their issues with me. I try to help them with all my understanding level and sort things out. This also helps me to create stronger bonds with other employees. Weakness :- I consider my weakness as trusting people so easily. I trust people so easily by their words and don't understand their bad motives at all. So because of this I get hurt mentality and emotionally many times. Example :- Due to my nature I trust people around me very easily so because of this many people has taken advantage of me financially, results in the loss of money. My close friends too have taken many advantages of me by giving me their part of work to complete. I always understand their motive and evil nature after I get hurt from them. Yvette Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsADM-620ADM-620-O500Benchmark - Leadership Approaches115.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent70.0%Compare the various approaches to leadership as covered in the textbook. Include the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.20.0%Comparison of the various approaches to leadership as covered in the textbook are missing. Comparison does not include strengths and weaknesses of each approach.Comparison of the various approaches to leadership as covered in the textbook, including strengths and weaknesses of each approach is vague and inconsistent.Comparison of the various approaches to leadership as covered in the textbook, including strengths and weaknesses of each approach is present.Comparison of the various approaches to leadership as covered in the textbook, including strengths and weaknesses of each approach is present, clear and makes connections to some research.Comparison of the various approaches to leadership as covered in the textbook, including strengths and weaknesses of each approach, is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.Describe how chosen approach might influence a leader’s philosophy on public service.25.0%Description how chosen approach might influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is missing.Description how chosen approach might influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is vague and inconsistent.Description how chosen approach might influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is present.Description how chosen approach might influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is present, clear and makes connections to some research.Description how chosen approach might influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is clear, concise, and makes connections to curre ...

1. Response 3
My scores was 15, 14, 13, 14, 15, 15
Strength :-
I consider my greatest strength as Empathy. It is because I have
the ability to feel and understand other's pain or emotions.
Example :-
As I work in a company, I have many people around me all the
times. Sometimes due to my quality, my co employees come and
discuss their issues with me. I try to help them with all my
understanding level and sort things out. This also helps me to
create stronger bonds with other employees.
Weakness :-
I consider my weakness as trusting people so easily. I trust
people so easily by their words and don't understand their bad
motives at all. So because of this I get hurt mentality and
emotionally many times.
Example :-
Due to my nature I trust people around me very easily so
because of this many people has taken advantage of me
financially, results in the loss of money. My close friends too
have taken many advantages of me by giving me their part of
work to complete. I always understand their motive and evil
nature after I get hurt from them.
Yvette
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment
TitleTotal PointsADM-620ADM-620-O500Benchmark -
Leadership Approaches115.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory
(0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory
(79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints
EarnedContent70.0%Compare the various approaches to
leadership as covered in the textbook. Include the strengths and
weaknesses of each approach.20.0%Comparison of the various

2. approaches to leadership as covered in the textbook are missing.
Comparison does not include strengths and weaknesses of each
approach.Comparison of the various approaches to leadership as
covered in the textbook, including strengths and weaknesses of
each approach is vague and inconsistent.Comparison of the
various approaches to leadership as covered in the textbook,
including strengths and weaknesses of each approach is
present.Comparison of the various approaches to leadership as
covered in the textbook, including strengths and weaknesses of
each approach is present, clear and makes connections to some
research.Comparison of the various approaches to leadership as
covered in the textbook, including strengths and weaknesses of
each approach, is clear, concise, and makes connections to
current research.Describe how chosen approach might influence
a leader’s philosophy on public service.25.0%Description how
chosen approach might influence a leader’s philosophy on
public service is missing.Description how chosen approach
might influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is vague
and inconsistent.Description how chosen approach might
influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is
present.Description how chosen approach might influence a
leader’s philosophy on public service is present, clear and
makes connections to some research.Description how chosen
approach might influence a leader’s philosophy on public
service is clear, concise, and makes connections to current
research.Explain how principles of Christian leadership could
influence a leader’s philosophy on public service. (Comp
1.2).25.0%Explanation of how principles of Christian leadership
could influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is
missing.Explanation of how principles of Christian leadership
could influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is vague
and inconsistent.Explanation of how principles of Christian
leadership could influence a leader’s philosophy on public
service is present.Explanation of how principles of Christian
leadership could influence a leader’s philosophy on public
service is present, clear and makes connections to some

3. research.Explanation of how principles of Christian leadership
could influence a leader’s philosophy on public service is clear,
concise, and makes connections to current
research.Organization and Effectiveness20.0%Thesis
Development and Purpose7.0%Paper lacks any discernible
overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently
developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and
appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the
development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is
comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis
statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic
and Construction8.0%Statement of purpose is not justified by
the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim
made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible
sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument
lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is
orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument
presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically,
but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are
credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a
persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All
sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes
spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0%Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of
meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is
used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence

4. structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose
is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of
standard, written, academic English.Format10.0%Paper Format
(use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)5.0%Template is not used appropriately or
documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate
template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A
lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template
is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may
be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are
virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are
correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and
style)5.0%Sources are not documented.Documentation of
sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources
are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are
documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format
is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly
documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format
is free of error.Total Weightage100%
DQ2-2
1.
Paul Moore
Re: Topic 2 DQ 2
I took the survey: Conceptualizing leadership
Traits – 13
Abilities – 16
Skill - 20
Behavior- 18

5. Relationship 18
Process - 19
My weakest trait is my lack of organization. I struggle with
keeping myself organized. My desk is a mess, my truck is a
mess and I know it affects my work. This is something that I am
improving on. The reason I count this as a weakness is that it
decreases my efficiency and causes undue stress on myself.
This has affected me in the past by me displacing items that I
needed for a project and I would have to recreated them or go
and get them from another team member. This affects
credibility.
One of my strengths is that I have a lot of experience in my
field. I still consider myself a student of the craft. I have
worked with people who have 20 years on the job but they
stopped learning after 1. They continue to apply their one year
of knowledge over and over and never progress. This reminds
me of the scene in the movie Backdraft where the crew is in the
kitchen. In the background is a quote on the wall. “200 years of
tradition, unimpeded by progress”. This is not me. I love to
learn and constantly challenge myself and those around me to
do so.
An example of this is when I was asked to take a staff captains
job and work in our facilities management division. I showed up
and 4 hours into the first day I was sitting in a budget meeting.
I was in over my head. I sought help and enrolled in training
and I learned. So today I am a better, more effective manager
and hopefully leader because of it.
Paul
https://edge.sagepub.com/northouseintro4e
2.
Re: Topic 2 DQ 2
Q1. Take one of the questionnaires located in the textbook or

6. SAGE student resource site. What do you perceive as your
greatest strength?
A1. I took the Conceptualizing Leadership Questionnaire,(Sabo,
n.d.). My responses did not give me a specific emphasis on any
given strength. Below are my scores:
Trait Emphasis 15
Ability Emphasis 15
Skill Emphasis 15
Behavior Emphasis 15
Relationship Emphasis 13
Process Emphasis 14
I perceive my greatest strengths to be within the trait, ability
and skill emphasis. I think much of a successful leader is
natural talent. Like an amazing athlete, I believe that the best
leaders have a natural talent but will only reach their full
potential if the leader works hard at developing that talent.
Q2. Give an example of how your behavior in one situation
illustrated this strength.
A2. I have been blessed with the gift of being one of those
people who have a positive disposition. However, I work hard at
staying positive and focus on how I phrase the words I say, so
even if things are difficult or hard, I focus on the opportunity
not the obstacles. This encourages people to want to be around
me, seek me for advice and let me be a mentor. I have a number
of friends who are more financially successful than I, but on a
regular basis I am the one they call to discuss difficult business
decisions. Not because I am smarter, or more experienced, but
because of how I treat them, and they know I have their best
interest at heart.
Q3. What do you perceive as your greatest weakness?
A3. I sometimes desire not to seek others input. It has been my
experience that many people have opinions, which I appreciate,
but have no foundation, facts or information to back up their
statements. I lose patience with those who want a voice at the
table but are ill informed or only speak by emotion and are
unable to qualify their belief.

7. Q4. Give an example of how your behavior in one situation
illustrated this weakness.
A4. Anytime I look at social media, I literally have to hold my
tongue at the posts that are stated as fact, which I know to be
untrue. All of these people are friends, family or colleagues but
the ignorance in some of the posts, especially when they re-post
someone else's information as fact, is daunting. I have learned
that not reacting enables me to maintain that relationship for
more important discussions in the future. This is especially
important from a Christian World View, as I would never want
to say or do anything that would prevent someone from
becoming a Christian.
Sabo, A. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/sage/2019/leading-
public-organizations-custom_1e.php