SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 81
Acute leukemia
Dr Arun Sankar S
Moderator: Dr S Ghoshal
31/03/2006
Introduction
• Leukemia is a neoplastic disorder of the hematopoetic
system, charecterised by aberrant or arrested
differentiation.
• Uncontrolled clonal proliferation and accumulation of
blasts cells in the bone marrow and body tissues.
• Acute leukemia
• Sudden onset
• Aggressive disease
• Poorly differentiated cells with many blasts
• If left untreated is fatal within a few weeks or months
Introduction
• Classification
– Acute lymphoblastic leukemia ( ALL)
– Acute myeloid leukemia ( AML)
ALL
• MC cancer in children
– 25% of childhood cancers
– 30-40 per million.
– 3950 new cases annually in US
– >2500 in children & adolescents
– Incidence gradually increasing.
• Peak age gp – 2-3 years.
– Median age – 10 yrs
– Males – 1.3 times
– Whites – more common
AML
• Disease of advancing age
– Median age 65 yrs
• 90% of all acute leukemias
– 25% of all leukemias
Etiology – acute leukemia
• Genetic – 10-15% esp ALL
– Syndromes of impaired DNA repair
• Fanconi’s anemia
• Ataxia telengectasia
• Bloom’s syndrome
– Li Fraumeni syndrome (germline p53 mutation)
– Inherited immunodeficiency – Wiskott-Akdrich syndrome
– Neurofibromatosis type I
– Down syndrome
• < 3 yrs – megakaryoblastic AML
• Older children – ALL
– Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors - megakaryoblastic AML
Etiology – acute leukemia
• Occupational & environmental
– Chemicals
• Benzene
• Hydrocarbons, herbicides & thorotrast
– Cigarette smoking - AML
– Radiation
• Atomic bomb
• Radiation plant employees
Etiology – acute leukemia
• Secondary leukemias
– Chemotherapy
• Nitrosoureas, alkylating agents, procarbazine, podophyllotoxins
• Risk between 2-9 yrs
• 90% AML, very difficult to treat
– Radiotherapy
• Treated for benign disorders
• Malignancy
• Infections
– EBV
– ? HTLV-1
A L L
Classification - ALL
• Morphologic classification by FAB cooperative working
group
• L1
– Most common form in children (85%)
– Good prognosis
• L2
– Most common form in adults
– Same genetic abnormalities as L1
• L3
– Rarest form
– Identical to Burkitt’s lymphoma cells
– Mature B cell immunophenotype
L1 L2 L3
•Small cell
•Clumped
homogenous
chromatin
•Indistinct nucleoli
• Regular nucleus
•Scant cytoplasm-
slight basophilia
•Larger cells
•Heterogenous nuclear
chromatin
•Prominent nucleoli
•Irregular, indented
nucleus
•Moderate cytoplasm,
variable basophilia
• Large cell
• Fine homogenous
chromatin
• Prominent nucleoli
• Regular nucleus,
oval or round
• Moderate cytoplasm,
deep basophilia
• FAB classification – advantages
– Prognostic value . L1 better than L2. L3 has worst prognosis.
• criticism
– Does not correlate with immunophenotypic & cytogenetic
information.
– Subjective nature of classification
• Hence newer – immunophenotypic classification
– B cell
– T cell
• B cell ALL
– Express CD79a, CD19, HLA DR, CD10 antigen (cALLa) etc.
– 80-85% of childhood ALL
– 80% cALLa +, if negative – bad prognosis
• In infants, cALLa neg is assoc with 11q23 abnormalities & poor outcome.
– 3 types
– Some classifications – pro B cell group / transitional pre B group
Early pre B Pre B B cell
No surface or
cytoplasmic Ig
75% cases
Best prognosis
Cytoplasmic Ig
20-25%
Surface Ig
2%
L3 type
• T cell ALL
– Express CD3, CD7, CD2 or CD5
– Usually in a male, older age, with leukocytosis and mediastinal
mass.
– Prognosis bad, however with intensive therapy, has similar
outcome.
Clinical features
May present as
• Recurrent or severe infection.
• Pallor
• Bruising or petechiae
• Bone pain & limping gait.
• Lymphadenopathy – 50%
• Hepatosplenomegaly – 30-50%
• Extra medullary manifestations
– CNS
• 5% clinical symptoms
• Diffuse or focal neurological signs
• Raised ICP
• Seizures & nuchal rigidity
• Cranial N palsy – facial N
• Hypothalamic involvement
• Epidural infiltrate compressing the cord etc…
– Anterior mediastinal mass
• 10% cases
• Infiltration of thymus
• Usually T cell type
• Life threatening tracheobronchial / cardio vascular
compression – prompt chemo or XRT.
– Genito-urinary
• Clinical testicular involvement – rare
• Occult involvement – 21%, not clinically significant.
• Ovarian involvement – 30%
• Renal enlargement – leukemic infiltration/ hyperuricemia or
pyelonephritis.
– Bone and joint manifestations
• In 40 % - limp or painful bones
• Bone pain due to – direct leukemic infiltration of
periosteum, periosteal elevation, bone infarction, or
expansion of marrow cavity.
– Ocular manifestations
• In 33%
• Retinal haemorrhages – MC
• Ocular motor palsies & papilledema, indicate meningeal
leukemia – prompt XRT needed, if optic N involved.
Prognostic factors
• Age
• Strong prognostic factor
• Infants – high risk of Rx failure
– MLL gene rearrangement 11q23 common
– Associated with – high initial TC, CNS leukemia, cALLa –ve
• 1-9 years – best prognosis
• Adolescents better prognosis if Txed on pediatric & not adult
ALL protocols.
• WBC count at diagnosis
– > 50,000/μl – increased risk of treatment failure
• CNS status at diagnosis
– CNS 1 – CSF < 5 cells/μl & cytospin negative for blasts
– CNS 2 – CSF < 5 cells/μl & cytospin positive for blasts
– CNS 3 – CSF ≥ 5 cells/μl & cytospin positive for blasts
• ALL with CNS 2&3 are at higher risk for Tx failure both
within CNS & systemically
• Gender
– Girls, slightly better
– Boys, at increased risk of testicular, BM & CNS relapse.
• Morphology
– L1 – early pre B – good prognosis
– T cell - bad
• Cytogenetics
– Chromosome number
• Hyperdiploidy (> 50 chr or DNA index – 1.6) – good
– Seen in 25% B cell ALL, rare in T cell
• Trisomies 4, 10, 17 – good
• Hypodiploidy – treatment failure.
– Chromosome translocation
• TEL-AML1 t(12;21) in 25% B precursors – excellent
• Philadelphia chr t(9;22) – older pts with B precursors –
unfavourable
• MLL (11q23) gene involvement, usually infants - poor
• Early response to treatment
– Day 7 or 14 BM response
– Day 7 peripheral blood response
– Minimal residual disease by PCR at end of induction phase.
Investigative workup
• Establishing diagnosis
– Peripheral blood film, counts
– Bone marrow examination.
– Cytogenetic studies & immunophenotyping – if possible.
• Radiology
– CXR – LN, mediastinal widening, infections.
– USG Abd – renal size, hepatospenomegaly.
– Skeletal X-ray if symptoms.
• Biochemical
– RFT, electrolytes, uric acid, phosphate & Calcium.
– LFT.
• Microbiology
– Culture & sensitivity.
Treatment of ALL
• Over last 5 decades, dramatic improvement in the
prognosis.
• Single agents in 1950’s
• Combination agents in 1960’s
– Leukemia in CNS as initial site of relapse became
progressively more evident.
– Concept of pharmacological sanctuary - CNS
• Leukemic cells, even if subclinical, were present in CNS of all patients.
Protected from systemic chemotherapy by BBB.
• Radiation to CNS in 1970’s
– Pivotal step boosting long term DFS to > 50%
• Intensive therapy since 1980’s with good supportive care
– Complete remission > 95%
– Long term EFS > 80%
Phases of treatment
• 4 phases
• Remission induction
• CNS – directed therapy
• Intensification or consolidation
• Continuation
Remission induction
• aim
– Induce complete remission. – rapidly reduce leukemic cell
burden to a clinically & hematologically undetectable level.
• hematologic remission
– Normocellular BM with ≤ 5% blasts
– No blasts in peripheral blood
– Granulocyte count > 1000
– Platelet count > 1 lakh.
• complete remission
– Above criteria +
– Absence of any signs & symptoms of extramedullary disease.
• Duration of most regimes – 4-6 wks.
Remission induction
• Drugs
– Atleast 3 agents
• L-asparaginase 6000 u/m2 IM
• Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 IV
• Prednisolone 40mg/m2 PO
• Daunorubicin 30 mg/m2 IV
4 drug Rx – better survival in high risk pts. ? Benefit for low risk
However, high short term morbidity esp.- neutropenia, infections.
– Initiation of CNS therapy – integral component.
• IT methotrexate <2 yrs – 8mg, 2-3yrs – 10mg, >3yrs – 12mg
±
• IT cytarabine <2 yrs – 30mg, 2-3yrs – 50mg, >3yrs – 70mg
Remission induction
Methotrexate IT
L-asparaginase
Vincristine
Prednisolone
PGI ALL
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
5
2
6
2
7
2
8
2
9
Cytarabine IT
Methotrexate IT
L-asparaginase
Vincristine
Prednisolone
MRC ALL 97/01 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
5
2
6
2
7
2
8
2
9
Remission induction
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
5
2
6
2
7
2
8
2
9
MCP841 – TATA, AIIMS, Adayar
Remission induction
• Failure to achieve remission
– Less than 5%
– Use 2nd line agents – cytarabine, teniposide, daunomycin,
idarubicin.
– Ideally, after remission they should be considered for allogenic
stem cell transplantation
CNS treatment
• Initiated during induction therapy
• Definitive CNS Rx started immediately after induction.
– May be delayed by several months, if initial CSF is negative.
• Radiation therapy
– First modality, successfully used.
– 2400 – 1200 cGy to whole brain.
– Should be given to all patients with blasts in CSF.
• Intrathecal therapy
– IT MTx – induction and consolidation phases, along with radiation.
– IT MTx – induction, consolidation & continuation phases with intensive
systemic therapy, avoiding radiation in patients with low risk. (CCG study)
Intensification / consolidation
• Goal
– To further reduce the disease burden. (1010 blasts-at end of remission)
– Early studies – if no further Rx, most patients relapse with a median of
2-3 months.
– Designed to minimise the development of drug cross resistance.
– On some protocols, intensification delivered immediately after
remission – early intensification
Others – after a period of less intensive therapy – late intensification.
– Both low risk & the high risk groups benefit from these intensive cycle
of chemotherapy
– Anthracycline – doxo/dauno or high dose MTx
L- asparaginase, vincristine, steroids, cytarabine, endoxan
6 TG or 6 MP. Or various combinations of these.
– Various regimes exist, optimal treatment unknown.
Intensification / consolidation
• Examples
– PGI
• Early intensification (week 5-6)
– continue PDN for 1wk, taper off by day 44
– Vincristine – day 29, 63.
– Daunorubicin – 45mg/m2 IV day 29, 31
– Etoposide 100mg/m2 IV alternate day x 5 (29,31,33,35,37)
– Cytarabine 100mg/m2/dose BD IV –alternate day x 5
– 6TG – 60mg/m2 PO alternate day x 5
• CNS therapy (week 9-11), continuation phase (week 11-20)
• Late intensification ( week20-21) – instead of PDN – dexona
6mg/m2
• UK ALL group – both early & delayed intensification has
superior outcome than just one.
also three cycles better than two. –Eg- UK MRC ALL 97/01.
MCP841
Continuation
• Less intensive therapy to complete at least 2 years.
• Weekly low dose MTx
daily oral 6 MP
± pulses of steroids + vincristine ( ? Benefit)
• How long ?
– Study by CCG – no significant benefit 5 yrs vs. 3 yrs.
– Study by UK ALL group – 2 yrs vs. 3 yrs – no significant survival
advantage.
– Boys however benefit from a more prolonged treatment.
– ? Even shorter duration with more intensive regime
• BFM group – 18 vs. 24 months – higher relapse
• Tokyo children’s cancer study group – only 12 mnth. – high relapse.
– Standard
• 2 years – female
• 3 years – male
Special subsets
• Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL
– t(9;22)(q34;q11)
– 5% of children, 20% adult ALL
– Dismal prognosis (EFS 0-25%)
– Allogenic stem cell transplantation may improve survival.
• Infants
– Poor prognosis & increased vulnerability to toxic effects of Rx.
– Biologically distinct form – MLL gene rearrangement.
– Very high dose cytarabine – may have a benefit.
– DFCI ALL protocol – early intensification with high dose cytarabine,
MTx and delayed cranial irradiation.
– EFS <40%.
Risk adapted therapy
• Goal
– “Treat away” adverse presenting features, so that cure rates are
similar to low risk disease
– Reduction in the use of elements with significant toxicity in low risk
disease.
High risk
• BCR/ABL +
• hypodiploidy (<44 chr)
• MLL gene rearrangement
Standard risk Intermediate risk
• Age >1 & < 10 yrs
• TLC < 50,000
• age > 10 yrs
• TLC > 50,000
• > 25% blasts on day 15 or
> 5% blasts on day 29 in BM
while on Rx.
Vincristine D1,8,15,22 & 29
Pred + Mtx + VCR + 6 MP
Dexa + VCR + Doxo + L Aspar +
Cyclo + TG + Ara-C
Pred + Mtx + VCR +
6 MP
Pred + Mtx + VCR + PEG L Aspar
Regimen A
Pred + L Aspar
Regimen B
Pred+ L Aspar + Dano
Pred + VCR
+ 6 MP
Pred + Mtx + VCR + 6 MP
Dexa + VCR + Doxo + L Aspar
+ Cyclo + TG + Ara-C
“Augmented BFM”
Cyclo + Ara-C + 6 MP +
VCR + PEG L Aspar
Pred + Mtx + VCR + PEG L Aspar
Regimen C
Pred+ L Aspar + Dano
Cyclo + Ara C
+ 6 MP
Adult ALL
• Poorer prognosis
• Increasing incidence of Philadelphia chr.(20%)
– Those who have CR – considered for allogenic BMT.
• Older age –itself poor prognosis.
• Poorer tolerance to intensive chemotherapy.
• 35-40% 2 year survival with aggressive treatment & best
supportive care.
• Young adults better treated with pediatric protocols.
Adult ALL
• PGI protocol (modified BFM)
• Induction
– Phase A (1-4 wks)
• PDN -60mg/m2 PO
• Vincristine -1.5 mg/m2 IV weekly
• Daunorubicin -30 mg/m2 IV weekly
• L-asparaginase -70,000 units/m2 IV twice weekly (2nd wk onwards)
• Endoxan -800mg/m2 IV day 1, 28
• BM examin for remission
– Phase B (5-9 wks)
• Endoxan IV wk 5, 7
• Cytarabine 75 mg/m2 -4 days/wk wk 5,6,7,8
• IT MTx – 12mg/m2 upto 15 – wkly
• XRT week 7 onwards.
• Consolidation (wk 10-14)
– Cytarabine 100mg/m2 x 4 days , wk 10 & 13
– Etoposide – same dosage
– IT MTx – week 12
– BM examination.
• Reinduction
– Phase 1 (wk 15-18)
• Prednisolone
• Vincristine
• Doxorubicin
• L-asparaginase
– Phase 2 (wk19-22)
• Endoxan
• Cytarabine
• IT MTx
– BM examination
• Maintanence phase
• T. 6 MP 75 mg/m2 daily
• T. MTx 25mg/m2 weekly
• Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 monthly IV
• PDN 60 mg/m2 x 5days monthly
• IT MTx 3 monthly
– 2 years in females
– 3 years in males
• Relapse
• Ifosfamide 1.6- 4 gm/m2 D1-5
• Etoposide 100mg/m2 D1-5 max 2 cycles
• Maintain with D1-3 CCT for 1 year.
Cranial Irradiation.
• Indication
– Prophylactic
– Therapeutic
Prophylactic
• Early evidence
– Studies V & VI from SJCRH ( 1962-67)
• CSI to 24 Gy/16# - isolated CNS relapse 64% to 4%.
• 12 Gy not found useful.
• However, acute myelosuppression, late musculoskeletal
dysplasia.
– Study VI
• CSI vs. cranial XRT + IT MTx.
• Equivalent with 8 % risk of relapse.
– Study VII
• IV MTx & XRT in close proximity avoided.
• Oral MTx & 6 MP as maintenance decreased relapse.
– CCSG study 101
• 24 Gy CSI+ liver, spleen, gonads
• 24 Gy CSI
• 24 Gy cranial + IT MTx
• IT MTx
– Radiation definitely superior over IT MTx alone.
– Cranial RT + IT MTx superior to CSI
– CALGB studies
• In low risk ALL, CNS relapse rate is 5% regardless of CNS Rx.
• Recent trends
– In US, avoid XRT in all but high risk patients, avoiding long term
effects.
– CSSG trial – for low risk.
• Similar results if XRT substituted with IT MTx throughout
induction, consolidation & maintenance.
– CSSG 105 – intermediate risk.
• IT MTx with intensive CCT equivalent to
standard CCT with XRT.
• IT MTx alone with standard CCT – high CNS recurrence(20%).
– ALL high risk patients require XRT
• T cell ALL
• Counts > 1 lakh
Therapeutic
– All patients with CSF blasts + ( at diagnosis or relapse)
• Some exclude CSF -2 ( give more intense IT CCT), if TLC is normal.
• PGI
– All children were treated with XRT
• No strict risk stratification had been done.(? Are risk
factors same in indians)
• All children treated as high risk.
• Repeated lumbar puncture avoided. (infection )
• Bloody puncture at any time- relapse.
• New protocol (UK MRC ALL 97/01)
– Risk stratification, & no XRT for low risk patients.
– All adults with ALL
• Technique
– Volume: include all cranial meninges, including those
surrounding the optic nerve in the retro-orbit. And
extending down the spinal cord to level of L2.
– To keep lens dose to minimum.
– Immobilisation - supine position.
– Lateral opposed fields.
1. Rectangular field, with one edge running parellel to
Reid’s baseline
2. Using asymmetrical jaws & custom blocks, and keeping
the isocentre 15 mm behind the cornea, helps reduce
lens dose.
• Dose.
– Therapeutic – 2400 cGy /16#
– Prophylactic – 1800 cGy/12#
- 1200 cGy/8# with intensive CCT. (BFM-90 protocol)
– hyperfractionation ?
• The Dana Farber ALL consortium
• No definite advantage in relapse rates.
• Need for anesthesia twice daily.
Other roles of radiotherapy
• Testicular disease
– At presentation.
– At relapse.
Volume: both sides testis & spermatic cord upto the deep inguinal ring.
Positioning: supine
lead shield under scrotum to save perineum
penis taped against abdomen.
Field : direct anterior
Dose: 2400cGy/12#
Other roles of radiotherapy
• Retinal / optic nerve involvement.
– May present with mono-ocular blindness.
– Prompt Radiotherapy needed to salvage vision.
– Unilateral field or parallel opposed field
– 3x4 cm field, starting at the orbital rim
– If U/L – depth of 3 cm
– Dose: 2500 cGy/12#
• Severe bone pain.
– 1000 – 1500 cGy in 2-3 #
Other roles of radiotherapy
• Anterior mediastinal mass with severe dyspnoea
• Facial N palsy
• Treat from base of brain to peripheral extension over the
cheek.
• 2500 cGy
• Treat within 24 hrs – prompt restoration of motor power.
Follow up
• Monthly blood counts & clinical examination -2 years.
– Then at decreasing frequency.
• Most important clinical assessment: testis
• Routine bone marrow not indicated.
Relapse
Despite all this.
20-30 % relapse.
If EFS < 1 year, very bad prognosis.
• Bone marrow relapse
– Symptoms similar to initial presentation or on routine blood film.
– Confirm by bone marrow examination.
– Induction of remission – same regimen. 70-90% (Bcell)
– Maintaining remission
• Prolonged intensive CCT with CNS therapy.
Or
• High dose chemoradiotherapy & autologous/allogenic BMT.
• Standard CCT – 18% survival
• Intensive CCT – 30-40% ( very intensive-65%)
• Allogenic BMT – 25-60% (mortality 15-30%)
• Unrelated donor – 20-30%
• Autologous – 40-50% in good risk pts.
• Isolated CNS relapse -10%
– Headache, vomiting, raised ICP, FND, convulsions.
– CSF study. Look for relapse elsewhere – BM.
– 90% response with CNS directed therapy.
• IT MTx prolonged, with cranial XRT.
– They relapse later on in the BM.. Hence systemic CCT must.
• Isolated testicular relapse.
– Painless swelling of testicles.
– Biopsy B/L testis. Look for disease elsewhere.
– Systemic chemotherapy + testicular irradiation. ± CNS therapy.
• Relapses in other extra medullary sites
– Usually managed by local XRT & systemic therapy.
Complications of treatment
• Acute
– Metabolic
• Tumor lysis syndrome
– Anemia, thrombocytopenia
– Caogulation abnormality – T cell ALL, asparaginase –thrombosis
– Infection – bacterila, fungal & PCP
– Typhlitis
– Acute neurological toxicity – seizures, somnolence syndrome
– Pancreatitis
• Late effects
– CNS – low IQ, leukoencephalopathy
– Growth
– Bony morbidity- osteopenia, # , osteonecrosis
– Second malignancies – gliomas, AML
Summary
presentation
Investigative workup
& stabilisation
CSF study + day 1 IT
MTx
Induction + IT MTx
Bone marrow
Early intensification
CNS therapy (RT+ IT
MTX
continuation
Late intensification
continuation
2nd line agents –
BMT ideally
Follow up
BM relapse CNS relapse testicular
A M L
AML
• Disease of the elderly.
• Gradual improvement in survival, still majority patients
die from their disease.
• In older age group, the outcome remains frustratingly
disappointing.
Classification - FAB
• M0 - Minimally differentiated AML
– 5% cases.
– blasts are negative for B and T lymphoid antigens
– Negative or < 3% blasts stain for MPO, Sudan black and NSE
– Myeloid antigens : CD13, CD33 and CD11b are positive.
– Need to distinguish from ALL
• M1 Myeloblastic without maturation
– 10% cases.
– >90% myeloblasts.
– MPO & Sudan black >3%
– CD13,33,117
– Need to distinguish from ALL.
– Worse prognosis.
• M2 AML with maturation.
– 30-45% cases.
– > 20 % myeloblasts.
– Auer rods +
– MPO, lysozyme +
– t(8:21) abnormality- favourable prognosis
– Granulocytic sarcomas – chloromas - common
• M3 - Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APML)
– 8%
– Auer rods/ faggot cells++
– MPO +++
– Hypergranular & microgranular
– Assoc with DIC, bleeding
– t(15:17) is diagnostic
– Sensitive to ATRA.
• M4 Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia
– 15-25% cases
– Increased CNS involvement.
– Monocytes & promonocytes 20-80%
– M4 with eosinophilia ((M4-Eo),
assoc with del/inv 16q
• M5a Acute Monoblastic Leukemia 8%
• M5b AMoL with differentiation 5%
• > 80 % monocytic lineage cells.
• More organomegaly, tissue infiltration
• Rectum, skin nodules, gum
• t(9;11) & t(11q;23)
• M6 – acute erythroid leukemia (DiGuglielmo’s disease)
– 5-6%
– >50% erythroid precursors in the entire nucleated cells of BM
– > 20% myeloblasts
– DD – megaloblastic anemia.
• M7 acute megakaryoblastic leukemia
– 3-5%
– >50% blasts of megakaryocytic lineage.
– Platelet peroxidase +
– MPO & Sudan black -ve
– Lytic bone lesions in children.
– Mediastinal germ cell tumors in male.
WHO classification
1. AML with recurrent cytogenetic translocation
• t(8;21)
• APML t(15;17)
• inv16
• 11q23 abnormality
2. AML with multilineage dysplasia
• With prior MDS
• Without prior MDS
3. AML, therapy related
• Alkylating agent related
• Epipodophyllotoxin related
• Other types
4. AML not otherwise categorized
Same as FAB classification.
Symptoms & signs
– Weakness – leading symptom
– Fever & bleeding manifestation more common than in
ALL
– LADenopathy, HSM, less common
– CNS involvement – rare.
– Gingival hypertrophy, skin nodules & pinkish patches –
M4&5
Prognostic factors
– Older age group – poor
– Cytogenetics
– Prior dysplasia / secondary AML
– High presenting TLC
– KPS
– Male sex.
Cytogenetic classification
Favourable intermediate unfavourable
t(15;17) +8, -Y, +6, del(12p) del 5q, del 7q
inv 16 normal t(8;21) with del 9q
t(8;21) without del 9q 21q, del 9q, t(6;9)
t(9;22)
complex karyotype
Treatment
• 3 phases
– Remission induction
– Post remission treatment.
– maintenance
Non M3 - treatment
• Remission induction.
– Aim: cytoreduction to achieve CR
– CALGB trial 2 decades ago
• 3+7 induction regime.
• Daunorubicin 45mg/m2 D1-3 IV
Cytosine 100 mg/m2 BD D1-7 IV
• Marrow on day 14 ---60-75% CR
Other regimes
– Idarubicin vs. daunorubicin
– Mitoxantrone vs. daunorubicin
• Both found to have superior to daunorubicin.
• But with higher toxicity, and only in younger patients.
• Also unequal doses given.
– Higher dose cytarabine
• Higher response rate
• Too toxic
– Hence the standard for induction is the 3+7 regime.
• Consolidation
– 109 to 1010 cells still are circulating !!
– The options
• High dose chemotherapy
• Auto/ allo stem cell transplantation.
– High dose therapy
• Inj cytarabine 3gm/m2 BD D1, D3, D5.
• 3 consolidations.
• Stem cell transplantation
– Allogenic
• Limited to younger patients (<45 yrs)
• 50 – 55 % survive the procedure
• 15 % relapse
– Autologous
• Upto 60 years
• No GVleukemia effect.
• Leukemic cell reinfusion
– Comparing stem cell transplant with Chemotherapy.
• Significant impact in reducing relapse risk.
– In surviving patients !!
• No survival benefit.
• Maintanence ( optional)
– Tab 6 TG – 80mg BD D1-4
– Inj cytarabine 100mg/m2 SC on D5
– Continued for 6 months.
Older age group
• Unfavourable prognostic factors
• Inability to withstand intensive therapy.
• The decision to treat or not ?
• Lower doses of drugs.
• Inj cytosine 10mg/m2 SC 7-14 days
• Inj mitoxantrone 6mg/m2 IV D1-3
• T etoposide 100mg OD 7-14 days
• T 6 TG 40mg BD 7-14 days
– Assess monthly
M3 AML
• Induction
– ATRA + anthracycline ± cytarabine
• Cap ATRA 45 mg/m2 BD
• Daunorubicin – 50mg/m2 D1-3
• Consolidation
– Daunorubicin ± cytarabine
• Daunorubicin – 50mg/m2
• Cytarabine 100mg/m2 IV BD x 7 days ( if high risk)
• Maintenance
– ATRA ± low dose CCT
• ATRA 45 mg/m2/day BD x 15 days 3monthly
• T 6-MP 75 mg/m2 daily HS
• T MTx 20mg/m2 weekly.
Side effects of ATRA
Hyperleukocytosis
Retinoic acid syndrome
Newer approaches
• New chemotherapeutic drugs
• Clofarabine
• Arsenic trioxide
• Modulation of drug resistance -- PSC-833
• Sensitization
• Anti-angiogenesis
• Modulation of cell signaling
• Tipifarnib
• Immunotherapeutic
• Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin
SUPPORTIVE CARE
• Prevention & management of infections
– Antibiotics, antifungals
– Barrier nursing
• Support during bonemarrow aplasia period
– Blood products
– Management of DIC as in M3 AML
• Adequate hydration, allopurinol
• Management of metabolic complications
• Treat me to cure me ... I
want to have kids like me
to worry about...
• Ask me what is the
hardest part to me?
• Ask me what you can do
to help? But ask me in a
way I can understand...
• Treat me like you would
have wanted to be
treated way back when...
Cancer Treatment
… from the eyes of a child
Thank you for
wanting to
learn…and for
making a difference
in the lives of
children and young
adults
Photograph by K. Tartakoff

More Related Content

Similar to Acute leukemia.ppt

neuro-oncology tumors of brain and spine
neuro-oncology tumors of brain and spineneuro-oncology tumors of brain and spine
neuro-oncology tumors of brain and spineReshmaJose25
 
Non hodgkin lymphoma
Non hodgkin lymphomaNon hodgkin lymphoma
Non hodgkin lymphomaAli Azher
 
Acute leukemiaradha (1).pptx
Acute leukemiaradha (1).pptxAcute leukemiaradha (1).pptx
Acute leukemiaradha (1).pptxchetanpattar7
 
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaDrAyush Garg
 
cns,_nbl,_hbl,gonads,_nephro.ppt
cns,_nbl,_hbl,gonads,_nephro.pptcns,_nbl,_hbl,gonads,_nephro.ppt
cns,_nbl,_hbl,gonads,_nephro.pptPariaMotahari1
 
Dr. Vannala Raju UG Class-Childhood Leukaemias.pptx
Dr. Vannala Raju UG Class-Childhood Leukaemias.pptxDr. Vannala Raju UG Class-Childhood Leukaemias.pptx
Dr. Vannala Raju UG Class-Childhood Leukaemias.pptxVannalaRaju2
 
Thyroid cancers
Thyroid cancersThyroid cancers
Thyroid cancerslalith39
 
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ,laboratory findings,
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ,laboratory findings,Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ,laboratory findings,
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ,laboratory findings,DeepshikhaSinghmar
 
LEUKEMIA BY PRIYANKA.pptx...............
LEUKEMIA BY PRIYANKA.pptx...............LEUKEMIA BY PRIYANKA.pptx...............
LEUKEMIA BY PRIYANKA.pptx...............drpriyankaganani
 
Acute leukemia in children 2021
Acute leukemia in children 2021Acute leukemia in children 2021
Acute leukemia in children 2021Imran Iqbal
 
Unit 18 (B); Leukemia! A disease of white blood Cells
Unit 18 (B); Leukemia! A disease of white blood CellsUnit 18 (B); Leukemia! A disease of white blood Cells
Unit 18 (B); Leukemia! A disease of white blood CellsRashidUllah7
 
Childhood leukemia long vr
Childhood leukemia  long vrChildhood leukemia  long vr
Childhood leukemia long vrNahar Kamrun
 

Similar to Acute leukemia.ppt (20)

neuro-oncology tumors of brain and spine
neuro-oncology tumors of brain and spineneuro-oncology tumors of brain and spine
neuro-oncology tumors of brain and spine
 
Non hodgkin lymphoma
Non hodgkin lymphomaNon hodgkin lymphoma
Non hodgkin lymphoma
 
Acute leukemiaradha (1).pptx
Acute leukemiaradha (1).pptxAcute leukemiaradha (1).pptx
Acute leukemiaradha (1).pptx
 
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
 
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
 
cns,_nbl,_hbl,gonads,_nephro.ppt
cns,_nbl,_hbl,gonads,_nephro.pptcns,_nbl,_hbl,gonads,_nephro.ppt
cns,_nbl,_hbl,gonads,_nephro.ppt
 
Systemic lupus erythematosus2019
Systemic lupus erythematosus2019Systemic lupus erythematosus2019
Systemic lupus erythematosus2019
 
Dr. Vannala Raju UG Class-Childhood Leukaemias.pptx
Dr. Vannala Raju UG Class-Childhood Leukaemias.pptxDr. Vannala Raju UG Class-Childhood Leukaemias.pptx
Dr. Vannala Raju UG Class-Childhood Leukaemias.pptx
 
Leukemia
Leukemia Leukemia
Leukemia
 
Thyroid cancers
Thyroid cancersThyroid cancers
Thyroid cancers
 
Haematology Tutorial
Haematology TutorialHaematology Tutorial
Haematology Tutorial
 
Medulloblastoma n csi kiran
Medulloblastoma n csi kiranMedulloblastoma n csi kiran
Medulloblastoma n csi kiran
 
201 medulloblastoma
201 medulloblastoma201 medulloblastoma
201 medulloblastoma
 
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ,laboratory findings,
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ,laboratory findings,Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ,laboratory findings,
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ,laboratory findings,
 
ALL management
ALL managementALL management
ALL management
 
LEUKEMIA BY PRIYANKA.pptx...............
LEUKEMIA BY PRIYANKA.pptx...............LEUKEMIA BY PRIYANKA.pptx...............
LEUKEMIA BY PRIYANKA.pptx...............
 
Small cell carcinoma
Small cell carcinomaSmall cell carcinoma
Small cell carcinoma
 
Acute leukemia in children 2021
Acute leukemia in children 2021Acute leukemia in children 2021
Acute leukemia in children 2021
 
Unit 18 (B); Leukemia! A disease of white blood Cells
Unit 18 (B); Leukemia! A disease of white blood CellsUnit 18 (B); Leukemia! A disease of white blood Cells
Unit 18 (B); Leukemia! A disease of white blood Cells
 
Childhood leukemia long vr
Childhood leukemia  long vrChildhood leukemia  long vr
Childhood leukemia long vr
 

Recently uploaded

EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxRaymartEstabillo3
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxVS Mahajan Coaching Centre
 
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementHierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementmkooblal
 
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceRoles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceSamikshaHamane
 
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfEnzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfSumit Tiwari
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Jisc
 
Historical philosophical, theoretical, and legal foundations of special and i...
Historical philosophical, theoretical, and legal foundations of special and i...Historical philosophical, theoretical, and legal foundations of special and i...
Historical philosophical, theoretical, and legal foundations of special and i...jaredbarbolino94
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitolTechU
 
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptxFinal demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptxAvyJaneVismanos
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfUjwalaBharambe
 

Recently uploaded (20)

EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
 
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementHierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
 
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceRoles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
 
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfEnzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
 
Historical philosophical, theoretical, and legal foundations of special and i...
Historical philosophical, theoretical, and legal foundations of special and i...Historical philosophical, theoretical, and legal foundations of special and i...
Historical philosophical, theoretical, and legal foundations of special and i...
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
 
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptxFinal demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
 

Acute leukemia.ppt

  • 1. Acute leukemia Dr Arun Sankar S Moderator: Dr S Ghoshal 31/03/2006
  • 2. Introduction • Leukemia is a neoplastic disorder of the hematopoetic system, charecterised by aberrant or arrested differentiation. • Uncontrolled clonal proliferation and accumulation of blasts cells in the bone marrow and body tissues. • Acute leukemia • Sudden onset • Aggressive disease • Poorly differentiated cells with many blasts • If left untreated is fatal within a few weeks or months
  • 3. Introduction • Classification – Acute lymphoblastic leukemia ( ALL) – Acute myeloid leukemia ( AML)
  • 4. ALL • MC cancer in children – 25% of childhood cancers – 30-40 per million. – 3950 new cases annually in US – >2500 in children & adolescents – Incidence gradually increasing. • Peak age gp – 2-3 years. – Median age – 10 yrs – Males – 1.3 times – Whites – more common
  • 5. AML • Disease of advancing age – Median age 65 yrs • 90% of all acute leukemias – 25% of all leukemias
  • 6. Etiology – acute leukemia • Genetic – 10-15% esp ALL – Syndromes of impaired DNA repair • Fanconi’s anemia • Ataxia telengectasia • Bloom’s syndrome – Li Fraumeni syndrome (germline p53 mutation) – Inherited immunodeficiency – Wiskott-Akdrich syndrome – Neurofibromatosis type I – Down syndrome • < 3 yrs – megakaryoblastic AML • Older children – ALL – Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors - megakaryoblastic AML
  • 7. Etiology – acute leukemia • Occupational & environmental – Chemicals • Benzene • Hydrocarbons, herbicides & thorotrast – Cigarette smoking - AML – Radiation • Atomic bomb • Radiation plant employees
  • 8. Etiology – acute leukemia • Secondary leukemias – Chemotherapy • Nitrosoureas, alkylating agents, procarbazine, podophyllotoxins • Risk between 2-9 yrs • 90% AML, very difficult to treat – Radiotherapy • Treated for benign disorders • Malignancy • Infections – EBV – ? HTLV-1
  • 10. Classification - ALL • Morphologic classification by FAB cooperative working group • L1 – Most common form in children (85%) – Good prognosis • L2 – Most common form in adults – Same genetic abnormalities as L1 • L3 – Rarest form – Identical to Burkitt’s lymphoma cells – Mature B cell immunophenotype
  • 11. L1 L2 L3 •Small cell •Clumped homogenous chromatin •Indistinct nucleoli • Regular nucleus •Scant cytoplasm- slight basophilia •Larger cells •Heterogenous nuclear chromatin •Prominent nucleoli •Irregular, indented nucleus •Moderate cytoplasm, variable basophilia • Large cell • Fine homogenous chromatin • Prominent nucleoli • Regular nucleus, oval or round • Moderate cytoplasm, deep basophilia
  • 12. • FAB classification – advantages – Prognostic value . L1 better than L2. L3 has worst prognosis. • criticism – Does not correlate with immunophenotypic & cytogenetic information. – Subjective nature of classification • Hence newer – immunophenotypic classification – B cell – T cell
  • 13. • B cell ALL – Express CD79a, CD19, HLA DR, CD10 antigen (cALLa) etc. – 80-85% of childhood ALL – 80% cALLa +, if negative – bad prognosis • In infants, cALLa neg is assoc with 11q23 abnormalities & poor outcome. – 3 types – Some classifications – pro B cell group / transitional pre B group Early pre B Pre B B cell No surface or cytoplasmic Ig 75% cases Best prognosis Cytoplasmic Ig 20-25% Surface Ig 2% L3 type
  • 14. • T cell ALL – Express CD3, CD7, CD2 or CD5 – Usually in a male, older age, with leukocytosis and mediastinal mass. – Prognosis bad, however with intensive therapy, has similar outcome.
  • 15. Clinical features May present as • Recurrent or severe infection. • Pallor • Bruising or petechiae • Bone pain & limping gait. • Lymphadenopathy – 50% • Hepatosplenomegaly – 30-50% • Extra medullary manifestations
  • 16. – CNS • 5% clinical symptoms • Diffuse or focal neurological signs • Raised ICP • Seizures & nuchal rigidity • Cranial N palsy – facial N • Hypothalamic involvement • Epidural infiltrate compressing the cord etc… – Anterior mediastinal mass • 10% cases • Infiltration of thymus • Usually T cell type • Life threatening tracheobronchial / cardio vascular compression – prompt chemo or XRT.
  • 17. – Genito-urinary • Clinical testicular involvement – rare • Occult involvement – 21%, not clinically significant. • Ovarian involvement – 30% • Renal enlargement – leukemic infiltration/ hyperuricemia or pyelonephritis. – Bone and joint manifestations • In 40 % - limp or painful bones • Bone pain due to – direct leukemic infiltration of periosteum, periosteal elevation, bone infarction, or expansion of marrow cavity. – Ocular manifestations • In 33% • Retinal haemorrhages – MC • Ocular motor palsies & papilledema, indicate meningeal leukemia – prompt XRT needed, if optic N involved.
  • 18. Prognostic factors • Age • Strong prognostic factor • Infants – high risk of Rx failure – MLL gene rearrangement 11q23 common – Associated with – high initial TC, CNS leukemia, cALLa –ve • 1-9 years – best prognosis • Adolescents better prognosis if Txed on pediatric & not adult ALL protocols. • WBC count at diagnosis – > 50,000/μl – increased risk of treatment failure
  • 19. • CNS status at diagnosis – CNS 1 – CSF < 5 cells/μl & cytospin negative for blasts – CNS 2 – CSF < 5 cells/μl & cytospin positive for blasts – CNS 3 – CSF ≥ 5 cells/μl & cytospin positive for blasts • ALL with CNS 2&3 are at higher risk for Tx failure both within CNS & systemically • Gender – Girls, slightly better – Boys, at increased risk of testicular, BM & CNS relapse. • Morphology – L1 – early pre B – good prognosis – T cell - bad
  • 20. • Cytogenetics – Chromosome number • Hyperdiploidy (> 50 chr or DNA index – 1.6) – good – Seen in 25% B cell ALL, rare in T cell • Trisomies 4, 10, 17 – good • Hypodiploidy – treatment failure. – Chromosome translocation • TEL-AML1 t(12;21) in 25% B precursors – excellent • Philadelphia chr t(9;22) – older pts with B precursors – unfavourable • MLL (11q23) gene involvement, usually infants - poor
  • 21. • Early response to treatment – Day 7 or 14 BM response – Day 7 peripheral blood response – Minimal residual disease by PCR at end of induction phase.
  • 22. Investigative workup • Establishing diagnosis – Peripheral blood film, counts – Bone marrow examination. – Cytogenetic studies & immunophenotyping – if possible. • Radiology – CXR – LN, mediastinal widening, infections. – USG Abd – renal size, hepatospenomegaly. – Skeletal X-ray if symptoms. • Biochemical – RFT, electrolytes, uric acid, phosphate & Calcium. – LFT. • Microbiology – Culture & sensitivity.
  • 23. Treatment of ALL • Over last 5 decades, dramatic improvement in the prognosis. • Single agents in 1950’s • Combination agents in 1960’s – Leukemia in CNS as initial site of relapse became progressively more evident. – Concept of pharmacological sanctuary - CNS • Leukemic cells, even if subclinical, were present in CNS of all patients. Protected from systemic chemotherapy by BBB. • Radiation to CNS in 1970’s – Pivotal step boosting long term DFS to > 50% • Intensive therapy since 1980’s with good supportive care – Complete remission > 95% – Long term EFS > 80%
  • 24. Phases of treatment • 4 phases • Remission induction • CNS – directed therapy • Intensification or consolidation • Continuation
  • 25. Remission induction • aim – Induce complete remission. – rapidly reduce leukemic cell burden to a clinically & hematologically undetectable level. • hematologic remission – Normocellular BM with ≤ 5% blasts – No blasts in peripheral blood – Granulocyte count > 1000 – Platelet count > 1 lakh. • complete remission – Above criteria + – Absence of any signs & symptoms of extramedullary disease. • Duration of most regimes – 4-6 wks.
  • 26. Remission induction • Drugs – Atleast 3 agents • L-asparaginase 6000 u/m2 IM • Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 IV • Prednisolone 40mg/m2 PO • Daunorubicin 30 mg/m2 IV 4 drug Rx – better survival in high risk pts. ? Benefit for low risk However, high short term morbidity esp.- neutropenia, infections. – Initiation of CNS therapy – integral component. • IT methotrexate <2 yrs – 8mg, 2-3yrs – 10mg, >3yrs – 12mg ± • IT cytarabine <2 yrs – 30mg, 2-3yrs – 50mg, >3yrs – 70mg
  • 27. Remission induction Methotrexate IT L-asparaginase Vincristine Prednisolone PGI ALL 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 Cytarabine IT Methotrexate IT L-asparaginase Vincristine Prednisolone MRC ALL 97/01 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9
  • 28. Remission induction 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 MCP841 – TATA, AIIMS, Adayar
  • 29. Remission induction • Failure to achieve remission – Less than 5% – Use 2nd line agents – cytarabine, teniposide, daunomycin, idarubicin. – Ideally, after remission they should be considered for allogenic stem cell transplantation
  • 30. CNS treatment • Initiated during induction therapy • Definitive CNS Rx started immediately after induction. – May be delayed by several months, if initial CSF is negative. • Radiation therapy – First modality, successfully used. – 2400 – 1200 cGy to whole brain. – Should be given to all patients with blasts in CSF. • Intrathecal therapy – IT MTx – induction and consolidation phases, along with radiation. – IT MTx – induction, consolidation & continuation phases with intensive systemic therapy, avoiding radiation in patients with low risk. (CCG study)
  • 31. Intensification / consolidation • Goal – To further reduce the disease burden. (1010 blasts-at end of remission) – Early studies – if no further Rx, most patients relapse with a median of 2-3 months. – Designed to minimise the development of drug cross resistance. – On some protocols, intensification delivered immediately after remission – early intensification Others – after a period of less intensive therapy – late intensification. – Both low risk & the high risk groups benefit from these intensive cycle of chemotherapy – Anthracycline – doxo/dauno or high dose MTx L- asparaginase, vincristine, steroids, cytarabine, endoxan 6 TG or 6 MP. Or various combinations of these. – Various regimes exist, optimal treatment unknown.
  • 32. Intensification / consolidation • Examples – PGI • Early intensification (week 5-6) – continue PDN for 1wk, taper off by day 44 – Vincristine – day 29, 63. – Daunorubicin – 45mg/m2 IV day 29, 31 – Etoposide 100mg/m2 IV alternate day x 5 (29,31,33,35,37) – Cytarabine 100mg/m2/dose BD IV –alternate day x 5 – 6TG – 60mg/m2 PO alternate day x 5 • CNS therapy (week 9-11), continuation phase (week 11-20) • Late intensification ( week20-21) – instead of PDN – dexona 6mg/m2 • UK ALL group – both early & delayed intensification has superior outcome than just one. also three cycles better than two. –Eg- UK MRC ALL 97/01.
  • 34. Continuation • Less intensive therapy to complete at least 2 years. • Weekly low dose MTx daily oral 6 MP ± pulses of steroids + vincristine ( ? Benefit) • How long ? – Study by CCG – no significant benefit 5 yrs vs. 3 yrs. – Study by UK ALL group – 2 yrs vs. 3 yrs – no significant survival advantage. – Boys however benefit from a more prolonged treatment. – ? Even shorter duration with more intensive regime • BFM group – 18 vs. 24 months – higher relapse • Tokyo children’s cancer study group – only 12 mnth. – high relapse. – Standard • 2 years – female • 3 years – male
  • 35. Special subsets • Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL – t(9;22)(q34;q11) – 5% of children, 20% adult ALL – Dismal prognosis (EFS 0-25%) – Allogenic stem cell transplantation may improve survival. • Infants – Poor prognosis & increased vulnerability to toxic effects of Rx. – Biologically distinct form – MLL gene rearrangement. – Very high dose cytarabine – may have a benefit. – DFCI ALL protocol – early intensification with high dose cytarabine, MTx and delayed cranial irradiation. – EFS <40%.
  • 36. Risk adapted therapy • Goal – “Treat away” adverse presenting features, so that cure rates are similar to low risk disease – Reduction in the use of elements with significant toxicity in low risk disease. High risk • BCR/ABL + • hypodiploidy (<44 chr) • MLL gene rearrangement Standard risk Intermediate risk • Age >1 & < 10 yrs • TLC < 50,000 • age > 10 yrs • TLC > 50,000 • > 25% blasts on day 15 or > 5% blasts on day 29 in BM while on Rx.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39. Vincristine D1,8,15,22 & 29 Pred + Mtx + VCR + 6 MP Dexa + VCR + Doxo + L Aspar + Cyclo + TG + Ara-C Pred + Mtx + VCR + 6 MP Pred + Mtx + VCR + PEG L Aspar Regimen A Pred + L Aspar Regimen B Pred+ L Aspar + Dano Pred + VCR + 6 MP Pred + Mtx + VCR + 6 MP Dexa + VCR + Doxo + L Aspar + Cyclo + TG + Ara-C “Augmented BFM” Cyclo + Ara-C + 6 MP + VCR + PEG L Aspar Pred + Mtx + VCR + PEG L Aspar Regimen C Pred+ L Aspar + Dano Cyclo + Ara C + 6 MP
  • 40. Adult ALL • Poorer prognosis • Increasing incidence of Philadelphia chr.(20%) – Those who have CR – considered for allogenic BMT. • Older age –itself poor prognosis. • Poorer tolerance to intensive chemotherapy. • 35-40% 2 year survival with aggressive treatment & best supportive care. • Young adults better treated with pediatric protocols.
  • 41. Adult ALL • PGI protocol (modified BFM) • Induction – Phase A (1-4 wks) • PDN -60mg/m2 PO • Vincristine -1.5 mg/m2 IV weekly • Daunorubicin -30 mg/m2 IV weekly • L-asparaginase -70,000 units/m2 IV twice weekly (2nd wk onwards) • Endoxan -800mg/m2 IV day 1, 28 • BM examin for remission – Phase B (5-9 wks) • Endoxan IV wk 5, 7 • Cytarabine 75 mg/m2 -4 days/wk wk 5,6,7,8 • IT MTx – 12mg/m2 upto 15 – wkly • XRT week 7 onwards.
  • 42. • Consolidation (wk 10-14) – Cytarabine 100mg/m2 x 4 days , wk 10 & 13 – Etoposide – same dosage – IT MTx – week 12 – BM examination. • Reinduction – Phase 1 (wk 15-18) • Prednisolone • Vincristine • Doxorubicin • L-asparaginase – Phase 2 (wk19-22) • Endoxan • Cytarabine • IT MTx – BM examination
  • 43. • Maintanence phase • T. 6 MP 75 mg/m2 daily • T. MTx 25mg/m2 weekly • Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 monthly IV • PDN 60 mg/m2 x 5days monthly • IT MTx 3 monthly – 2 years in females – 3 years in males • Relapse • Ifosfamide 1.6- 4 gm/m2 D1-5 • Etoposide 100mg/m2 D1-5 max 2 cycles • Maintain with D1-3 CCT for 1 year.
  • 44. Cranial Irradiation. • Indication – Prophylactic – Therapeutic Prophylactic • Early evidence – Studies V & VI from SJCRH ( 1962-67) • CSI to 24 Gy/16# - isolated CNS relapse 64% to 4%. • 12 Gy not found useful. • However, acute myelosuppression, late musculoskeletal dysplasia. – Study VI • CSI vs. cranial XRT + IT MTx. • Equivalent with 8 % risk of relapse. – Study VII • IV MTx & XRT in close proximity avoided. • Oral MTx & 6 MP as maintenance decreased relapse.
  • 45. – CCSG study 101 • 24 Gy CSI+ liver, spleen, gonads • 24 Gy CSI • 24 Gy cranial + IT MTx • IT MTx – Radiation definitely superior over IT MTx alone. – Cranial RT + IT MTx superior to CSI – CALGB studies • In low risk ALL, CNS relapse rate is 5% regardless of CNS Rx. • Recent trends – In US, avoid XRT in all but high risk patients, avoiding long term effects.
  • 46. – CSSG trial – for low risk. • Similar results if XRT substituted with IT MTx throughout induction, consolidation & maintenance. – CSSG 105 – intermediate risk. • IT MTx with intensive CCT equivalent to standard CCT with XRT. • IT MTx alone with standard CCT – high CNS recurrence(20%). – ALL high risk patients require XRT • T cell ALL • Counts > 1 lakh Therapeutic – All patients with CSF blasts + ( at diagnosis or relapse) • Some exclude CSF -2 ( give more intense IT CCT), if TLC is normal.
  • 47. • PGI – All children were treated with XRT • No strict risk stratification had been done.(? Are risk factors same in indians) • All children treated as high risk. • Repeated lumbar puncture avoided. (infection ) • Bloody puncture at any time- relapse. • New protocol (UK MRC ALL 97/01) – Risk stratification, & no XRT for low risk patients. – All adults with ALL
  • 48. • Technique – Volume: include all cranial meninges, including those surrounding the optic nerve in the retro-orbit. And extending down the spinal cord to level of L2. – To keep lens dose to minimum. – Immobilisation - supine position. – Lateral opposed fields. 1. Rectangular field, with one edge running parellel to Reid’s baseline 2. Using asymmetrical jaws & custom blocks, and keeping the isocentre 15 mm behind the cornea, helps reduce lens dose.
  • 49. • Dose. – Therapeutic – 2400 cGy /16# – Prophylactic – 1800 cGy/12# - 1200 cGy/8# with intensive CCT. (BFM-90 protocol) – hyperfractionation ? • The Dana Farber ALL consortium • No definite advantage in relapse rates. • Need for anesthesia twice daily.
  • 50. Other roles of radiotherapy • Testicular disease – At presentation. – At relapse. Volume: both sides testis & spermatic cord upto the deep inguinal ring. Positioning: supine lead shield under scrotum to save perineum penis taped against abdomen. Field : direct anterior Dose: 2400cGy/12#
  • 51. Other roles of radiotherapy • Retinal / optic nerve involvement. – May present with mono-ocular blindness. – Prompt Radiotherapy needed to salvage vision. – Unilateral field or parallel opposed field – 3x4 cm field, starting at the orbital rim – If U/L – depth of 3 cm – Dose: 2500 cGy/12# • Severe bone pain. – 1000 – 1500 cGy in 2-3 #
  • 52. Other roles of radiotherapy • Anterior mediastinal mass with severe dyspnoea • Facial N palsy • Treat from base of brain to peripheral extension over the cheek. • 2500 cGy • Treat within 24 hrs – prompt restoration of motor power.
  • 53. Follow up • Monthly blood counts & clinical examination -2 years. – Then at decreasing frequency. • Most important clinical assessment: testis • Routine bone marrow not indicated.
  • 54. Relapse Despite all this. 20-30 % relapse. If EFS < 1 year, very bad prognosis. • Bone marrow relapse – Symptoms similar to initial presentation or on routine blood film. – Confirm by bone marrow examination. – Induction of remission – same regimen. 70-90% (Bcell) – Maintaining remission • Prolonged intensive CCT with CNS therapy. Or • High dose chemoradiotherapy & autologous/allogenic BMT.
  • 55. • Standard CCT – 18% survival • Intensive CCT – 30-40% ( very intensive-65%) • Allogenic BMT – 25-60% (mortality 15-30%) • Unrelated donor – 20-30% • Autologous – 40-50% in good risk pts. • Isolated CNS relapse -10% – Headache, vomiting, raised ICP, FND, convulsions. – CSF study. Look for relapse elsewhere – BM. – 90% response with CNS directed therapy. • IT MTx prolonged, with cranial XRT. – They relapse later on in the BM.. Hence systemic CCT must.
  • 56. • Isolated testicular relapse. – Painless swelling of testicles. – Biopsy B/L testis. Look for disease elsewhere. – Systemic chemotherapy + testicular irradiation. ± CNS therapy. • Relapses in other extra medullary sites – Usually managed by local XRT & systemic therapy.
  • 57. Complications of treatment • Acute – Metabolic • Tumor lysis syndrome – Anemia, thrombocytopenia – Caogulation abnormality – T cell ALL, asparaginase –thrombosis – Infection – bacterila, fungal & PCP – Typhlitis – Acute neurological toxicity – seizures, somnolence syndrome – Pancreatitis • Late effects – CNS – low IQ, leukoencephalopathy – Growth – Bony morbidity- osteopenia, # , osteonecrosis – Second malignancies – gliomas, AML
  • 58. Summary presentation Investigative workup & stabilisation CSF study + day 1 IT MTx Induction + IT MTx Bone marrow Early intensification CNS therapy (RT+ IT MTX continuation Late intensification continuation 2nd line agents – BMT ideally Follow up BM relapse CNS relapse testicular
  • 59. A M L
  • 60. AML • Disease of the elderly. • Gradual improvement in survival, still majority patients die from their disease. • In older age group, the outcome remains frustratingly disappointing.
  • 61. Classification - FAB • M0 - Minimally differentiated AML – 5% cases. – blasts are negative for B and T lymphoid antigens – Negative or < 3% blasts stain for MPO, Sudan black and NSE – Myeloid antigens : CD13, CD33 and CD11b are positive. – Need to distinguish from ALL
  • 62. • M1 Myeloblastic without maturation – 10% cases. – >90% myeloblasts. – MPO & Sudan black >3% – CD13,33,117 – Need to distinguish from ALL. – Worse prognosis.
  • 63. • M2 AML with maturation. – 30-45% cases. – > 20 % myeloblasts. – Auer rods + – MPO, lysozyme + – t(8:21) abnormality- favourable prognosis – Granulocytic sarcomas – chloromas - common
  • 64. • M3 - Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APML) – 8% – Auer rods/ faggot cells++ – MPO +++ – Hypergranular & microgranular – Assoc with DIC, bleeding – t(15:17) is diagnostic – Sensitive to ATRA.
  • 65. • M4 Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia – 15-25% cases – Increased CNS involvement. – Monocytes & promonocytes 20-80% – M4 with eosinophilia ((M4-Eo), assoc with del/inv 16q • M5a Acute Monoblastic Leukemia 8% • M5b AMoL with differentiation 5% • > 80 % monocytic lineage cells. • More organomegaly, tissue infiltration • Rectum, skin nodules, gum • t(9;11) & t(11q;23)
  • 66. • M6 – acute erythroid leukemia (DiGuglielmo’s disease) – 5-6% – >50% erythroid precursors in the entire nucleated cells of BM – > 20% myeloblasts – DD – megaloblastic anemia.
  • 67. • M7 acute megakaryoblastic leukemia – 3-5% – >50% blasts of megakaryocytic lineage. – Platelet peroxidase + – MPO & Sudan black -ve – Lytic bone lesions in children. – Mediastinal germ cell tumors in male.
  • 68. WHO classification 1. AML with recurrent cytogenetic translocation • t(8;21) • APML t(15;17) • inv16 • 11q23 abnormality 2. AML with multilineage dysplasia • With prior MDS • Without prior MDS 3. AML, therapy related • Alkylating agent related • Epipodophyllotoxin related • Other types 4. AML not otherwise categorized Same as FAB classification.
  • 69. Symptoms & signs – Weakness – leading symptom – Fever & bleeding manifestation more common than in ALL – LADenopathy, HSM, less common – CNS involvement – rare. – Gingival hypertrophy, skin nodules & pinkish patches – M4&5
  • 70. Prognostic factors – Older age group – poor – Cytogenetics – Prior dysplasia / secondary AML – High presenting TLC – KPS – Male sex. Cytogenetic classification Favourable intermediate unfavourable t(15;17) +8, -Y, +6, del(12p) del 5q, del 7q inv 16 normal t(8;21) with del 9q t(8;21) without del 9q 21q, del 9q, t(6;9) t(9;22) complex karyotype
  • 71. Treatment • 3 phases – Remission induction – Post remission treatment. – maintenance
  • 72. Non M3 - treatment • Remission induction. – Aim: cytoreduction to achieve CR – CALGB trial 2 decades ago • 3+7 induction regime. • Daunorubicin 45mg/m2 D1-3 IV Cytosine 100 mg/m2 BD D1-7 IV • Marrow on day 14 ---60-75% CR Other regimes – Idarubicin vs. daunorubicin – Mitoxantrone vs. daunorubicin • Both found to have superior to daunorubicin. • But with higher toxicity, and only in younger patients. • Also unequal doses given.
  • 73. – Higher dose cytarabine • Higher response rate • Too toxic – Hence the standard for induction is the 3+7 regime. • Consolidation – 109 to 1010 cells still are circulating !! – The options • High dose chemotherapy • Auto/ allo stem cell transplantation. – High dose therapy • Inj cytarabine 3gm/m2 BD D1, D3, D5. • 3 consolidations.
  • 74. • Stem cell transplantation – Allogenic • Limited to younger patients (<45 yrs) • 50 – 55 % survive the procedure • 15 % relapse – Autologous • Upto 60 years • No GVleukemia effect. • Leukemic cell reinfusion – Comparing stem cell transplant with Chemotherapy. • Significant impact in reducing relapse risk. – In surviving patients !! • No survival benefit.
  • 75. • Maintanence ( optional) – Tab 6 TG – 80mg BD D1-4 – Inj cytarabine 100mg/m2 SC on D5 – Continued for 6 months.
  • 76. Older age group • Unfavourable prognostic factors • Inability to withstand intensive therapy. • The decision to treat or not ? • Lower doses of drugs. • Inj cytosine 10mg/m2 SC 7-14 days • Inj mitoxantrone 6mg/m2 IV D1-3 • T etoposide 100mg OD 7-14 days • T 6 TG 40mg BD 7-14 days – Assess monthly
  • 77. M3 AML • Induction – ATRA + anthracycline ± cytarabine • Cap ATRA 45 mg/m2 BD • Daunorubicin – 50mg/m2 D1-3 • Consolidation – Daunorubicin ± cytarabine • Daunorubicin – 50mg/m2 • Cytarabine 100mg/m2 IV BD x 7 days ( if high risk) • Maintenance – ATRA ± low dose CCT • ATRA 45 mg/m2/day BD x 15 days 3monthly • T 6-MP 75 mg/m2 daily HS • T MTx 20mg/m2 weekly. Side effects of ATRA Hyperleukocytosis Retinoic acid syndrome
  • 78. Newer approaches • New chemotherapeutic drugs • Clofarabine • Arsenic trioxide • Modulation of drug resistance -- PSC-833 • Sensitization • Anti-angiogenesis • Modulation of cell signaling • Tipifarnib • Immunotherapeutic • Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin
  • 79. SUPPORTIVE CARE • Prevention & management of infections – Antibiotics, antifungals – Barrier nursing • Support during bonemarrow aplasia period – Blood products – Management of DIC as in M3 AML • Adequate hydration, allopurinol • Management of metabolic complications
  • 80. • Treat me to cure me ... I want to have kids like me to worry about... • Ask me what is the hardest part to me? • Ask me what you can do to help? But ask me in a way I can understand... • Treat me like you would have wanted to be treated way back when... Cancer Treatment … from the eyes of a child
  • 81. Thank you for wanting to learn…and for making a difference in the lives of children and young adults Photograph by K. Tartakoff