Writing Assignment #1: Argument Analysis (15%) Technicalities and Must Haves: 4-5 full pages, Times New Roman, 12 font, Standard margins, Double spaced, MLA format. For examples and guidelines of MLA formatting, please see: Your Task: For this assignment, you will compare/contrast two of the course readings, juxtaposing the two authors’ positions on the same issue. You will analyze how well one author presented an argument in comparison to the other author, looking at the writing strategies, such as: · what kind of evidence they used/ how effective the evidence was at supporting their arguments (ex – scientific research studies versus personal experience); · their tone; · their voice (use of first person pronouns versus third person pronouns); · the authors’ credibility as “experts”; · audience awareness; · organization (order of how points are given, topic sentences, connections between points and paragraphs, etc.); · language use (ex – transition words to help guide the reader); Using, at most, three of the points above, you will answer the following question: Which author’s claims were more convincing and why? This assignment asks you to take a position and support the position with evidence from the source texts. In order to do this, your thesis should be more than a statement of fact. It should be clearly state your position regarding which author is more convincing and why, using sub-points. You will choose two of the following readings to write your argument analysis: 1. “Becoming members of society” by Holly Devor 2. “Why women still can’t have it all” by Anne-Marie Slaughter 3. “Why men still can’t have it all” by Richard Dorment 4. “The Transformation of Everyday Life” by Richard Florida Each of these authors presents perspectives about how society affects people’s perceptions and expectations of gender. Because good academic discussions do more than acknowledge what is readily apparent, your paper should make an argument for the subtle ways that the authors are actually similar or different in their writing approaches on a particular subject. If you choose Devor as one of your articles, you cannot compare the same writing strategies that you used in the first essay. For instance, if you analyzed Devor’s use of evidence in the first essay, you cannot focus on Devor’s use of evidence in this essay. The skills you will acquire by writing this essay are the following: Reading comprehension, summary, comparison, application of analytical frameworks and rhetorical methods, integrating quotations, introductions and conclusions, developing a thesis, attention to composing process, coherence, grammar issues Audience: Imagine that your readers for this assignment are peers who have not read any of these articles. Thus, you must give a brief overview of the authors’ main claims and key terms within your analysis. At most, consider having two-three sentences be a summary for each article. The rest should be your analysis. Requirement.

1. Writing Assignment #1: Argument Analysis (15%)
Technicalities and Must Haves: 4-5 full pages, Times New
Roman, 12 font, Standard margins, Double spaced, MLA
format. For examples and guidelines of MLA formatting, please
see:
Your Task:
For this assignment, you will compare/contrast two of the
course readings, juxtaposing the two authors’ positions on the
same issue. You will analyze how well one author presented an
argument in comparison to the other author, looking at the
writing strategies, such as:
· what kind of evidence they used/ how effective the evidence
was at supporting their arguments (ex – scientific research
studies versus personal experience);
· their tone;
· their voice (use of first person pronouns versus third person
pronouns);
· the authors’ credibility as “experts”;
· audience awareness;
· organization (order of how points are given, topic sentences,
connections between points and paragraphs, etc.);
· language use (ex – transition words to help guide the reader);
Using, at most, three of the points above, you will answer the
following question: Which author’s claims were more
convincing and why? This assignment asks you to take a
position and support the position with evidence from the source
texts. In order to do this, your thesis should be more than a
statement of fact. It should be clearly state your position
regarding which author is more convincing and why, using sub-
points. You will choose two of the following readings to write
your argument analysis:
1. “Becoming members of society” by Holly Devor
2. “Why women still can’t have it all” by Anne-Marie Slaughter
3. “Why men still can’t have it all” by Richard Dorment

2. 4. “The Transformation of Everyday Life” by Richard Florida
Each of these authors presents perspectives about how society
affects people’s perceptions and expectations of gender.
Because good academic discussions do more than acknowledge
what is readily apparent, your paper should make an argument
for the subtle ways that the authors are actually similar or
different in their writing approaches on a particular subject.
If you choose Devor as one of your articles, you cannot compare
the same writing strategies that you used in the first essay. For
instance, if you analyzed Devor’s use of evidence in the first
essay, you cannot focus on Devor’s use of evidence in this
essay.
The skills you will acquire by writing this essay are the
following: Reading comprehension, summary, comparison,
application of analytical frameworks and rhetorical methods,
integrating quotations, introductions and conclusions,
developing a thesis, attention to composing process, coherence,
grammar issues
Audience:
Imagine that your readers for this assignment are peers who
have not read any of these articles. Thus, you must give a brief
overview of the authors’ main claims and key terms within your
analysis. At most, consider having two-three sentences be a
summary for each article. The rest should be your analysis.
Requirements:
To achieve your purpose with your audience, use the following
strategies in your essay:
· In your introduction include: title of article, author’s full
name and credentials, a brief overview of the argument, and a
clear concise thesis statement.
· Use present tense when discussing a piece of writing. Use past
tense only when referring to historical events.

3. · Put the title of the articles in quotation marks.
· If you quote more than four lines remember to indent the
entire quotation one inch from the left-hand margins. Do not
include quotation marks, and all the parenthetical
documentation after the end of the punctuation. Introduce the
quotation using a colon,
· When mentioning the authors in the body of your essay, use
full name the first time, and the last name only after that. (Do
not use Mr./Mrs/Dr/etc.)
· Use MLA documentation style
1. There are 100 units of labor in Japan and 50 units of labor in
Taiwan. There are 50 units of land in Japan and 5 units of land
in Taiwan. You are given the following information about
production relationships.
Butane
aLB = 7
aTB = 2
Apple
aLA = 6
ATA = 3
Circle the right answer:
a. Determine each country's factor abundance and each good's
factor intensity.
Japan
Labor abumdant / Land abundant
Taiwan
Labor abumdant / Land abundant

4. Butane
Labor intensive / Land intensive
Apple
Labor intensive / Land intensive
b. According to the Heckscher Ohlin model, which country will
export butane?
Japan
Taiwan
c. Suppose in Taiwan the supply of labor decreased from 50
units to 20 units (everything else remains the same), which
country will export butane?
Japan
Taiwan
2. Assume that the technology available to both countries is
such that to produce one unit of wool requires 5 hours of labor
and 4 units of land; to produce one unit of chocolate requires 5
hours of labor and 2 units of land. In Australia there are 300
hours of labor and 200 units of land. In Belgium there are 100
hours of labor and 50 units of land. Answer the following
questions based on the HOS model.
a. Determine the factor intensities of the goods and the factor
abundances of the countries. Circle the right answer.
Australia
Labor abundant / Land abundant
Belgium

5. Labor abundant / Land abundant
Wool
Labor intensive / Land intensive
Chocolate
Labor intensive / Land intensive
b. In Australia, under autarky if price of chocolates is $54 and
price of wool is $58 then find wages and return to land.
w = ______
r = _______
c. In Belgium, under autarky if wages are $2 and return to land
is $10 then find prices of chocolates and wool in Belgium under
autarky.
Pw = _______
Pc = ________
d. Suppose that under trade the price of chocolates is $40 and
the price of wool is $52. Find wages and returns to land in both
countries under trade.
w = _______

6. r = ________
e. Who benefits and who loses from trade in each country?
Circle the right answer.
Australia
Labor:
benefits / loses
Land:
benefits / loses
Belgium
Labor:
benefits / loses
Land:
benefits / loses
f. Explain how the results confirm the Stolper Samuelson
theorem theorem.
3. Suppose that at current factor prices, each cask of wine
requires 3 workers and 1 unit of land to produce and each bolt
of cloth requires 2 workers and 4 units of land.
a. Suppose that a country’s resources are 100 workers and 120
units of land. Determine the allocation of resources and graph it
using the box diagram.
TC = ______
LC = _______
TW = _______

7. LW = _______
b. Suppose that the supply of labor increases to 120. Determine
the changing allocation of resources and graph it using the box
diagram. Do the results confirm the logic of the Rybczynski
effect?
TC = ______
LC = _______
TW = _______
LW = _______
Why Women Still Can't Have It All
Anne-Marie’s article demonstrates the dilemma that women face
when trying to balance between family life and career life. If
they continue with their careers, they will but their family
relationship in jeopardy. On the other hand, if they concentrate
on family life, their careers will end. The argument Anne brings
on board in this article is that the American people ought to
restructure the economy to meet a work-life balance. The
argument based on the increasing gender gap that has made
work-life balance even harder for women to achieve compared
to men. Anne anticipates that those women in leadership
positions will undoubtedly reduce this gap. The author
advocates for greater changes in the systems, hence having a
broader approach to the issue other than just basing on women
(Slaughter).
Anne focuses on the challenges high profile women face while
trying to balance work and family. The pressure they go through
to get the resources for childcare and housework. From her
argument, it is evident that women often make choices between
the two forces; family and career. It reveals that in the happiest
families, women take up most of the responsibilities at home.
The author’s main aim is to advocate for changes in economic
and social policies that will see this gap reduced. She presents

8. the characteristics of a woman with too many expectations from
both the family and career and argues that one needs super-
powers in order to discharge duties at both levels effectively.
The targeted audience in this article are the young educated
women, as she tries to let them know that it is not easy juggling
career and family. It calls for sacrifice and this could lead to
frustrations especially with the increasing demand for attention
from both sides. She argues that as long as the economic and
social policies are not changed, those women in high profile
jobs will continue experiencing the same dilemma and this will
have adverse effects on their lives. They will end up straining
beyond their limit due to fear of losing both their careers and
their families.
Slaughter continues to reveal her immediate position as a senior
official and outlines the challenges she has gone through in
trying a work-life balance. Her arguments emerge through a
proper organization of sentences and the use of simple English.
The structure of the sentences makes it even simpler for the
reader to grasp the concepts presented in the article. The author
sacrifices a better part of the article to identify the group of
young learned women she is addressing, to make her points
clear on the importance of closing the gendered leadership gap.
She further recognizes other women who have no worries about
having it all, but focus on keeping what they have. The fact that
there are even more pressing issues facing the lower income
women, it does not make this article of no importance. The
author in this article reveals the critics of her choices by
bringing in a well thought argument on the need to effect
economic and policy changes. Slaughter accepts that men are
not an exception in this argument, adding that they too have
equally same problems, only that women are the most affected
and are more likely to make choices between career and family.
In summary, Anne is blaming the economic and societal
structures that makes it impossible for women to fulfill their
career and care for their families and distances her arguments
against feminism.

9. Why men Still Can't Have It All
Dorment writes this article to counter Anne’s arguments. His
main point of defense is that men too struggle to maintain a
work life balance adding that life up there is never a smooth
sailing for everyone. He argues that one should not complain
while seeking life at the top since those high profile jobs come
with their own demands and rewards. While employing a
defensive tone, he fails to hold up to his argument (Dorment).
He does not bring the facts as to why men cannot have it all.
Whereas Anne identifies the “who” as women, Dorment in his
article identifies the “who” as men but finally discredits this
point by adding that the argument should be non-gendered. He
argues that Anne’s point is baseless and unpersuasive, adding
that she relies on personal experience. Dorment tries to bring in
the idea that both men and women go through the same
problems in equal measures. He discredits Anne’s idea that
women are more burdened by the pressure to balance both the
career and their families asserting that men on the other hand
are still the breadwinners in most families and they still go
through many challenges while trying to balance both career
and family. Dorment’s main shortcomings in his article is that
in his arguments, he does not bring any facts but goes ahead to
Anne’s article as misleading.
It is evident that Dorment wants us to shift the argument
towards the challenges facing individuals other than debating on
men versus women. This even creates more confusion since he
focuses on men and later sharply diverts the whole argument to
a more general one. He fails to highlight the historical facts for
inequality but rather offers advice for women and men on how
to handle work and life. Dorment has not explained the “it” in
the “have it all.” Unlike Anne, she clearly brings out the “it” as
a combination of family and work (Dorment). Dorment goes
ahead to use men who have failed in their responsibilities to
show that life is hard for men, which is not true. He should have
used his personal experience or even give facts other than

10. injecting his stories. He continues with his defensive position
citing Ellen Galinksy who asserts that men have a higher work-
family conflict. He accuses Slaughter of using her situation to
bring in a very sensitive discussion on board. This is not so
since Anne was just highlighting some of the problems most
high profile women go through. She uses her situation as an
example representing other women in other public institutions
going through the same problems she experienced. He further
argues that the fact women are not taking the choices available
for them should not be blamed on men or the employer. It is
evident that in his article, all he does is to blame Anne and
women in general. He does not give facts that show why men
cannot have it all neither does he support Slaughter’s argument
on why women cannot have it all. It therefore makes it so
difficult for the reader to understand his point of argument in
details.
The argument takes a new twist when Dorment uses mad men to
show how life can be hard for men and are more susceptible to
office politics (Goss). It is evident that Dorment’s article brings
a lot of confusion to the audience since he does not outline his
points clearly. He decides to take a defensive position, attacking
Slaughter’s work without giving facts on his arguments. Even
though the sentences in this article are well structured, he fails
to bring in the grammar part as he does not explain the “it” in
the “have it all.” This therefore makes Anne’s article the most
efficient in attempting to highlight the gender issues in our
societies in relation to career and family. She brings out clearly
the pressing issues facing women and gives her
recommendations on how to best deal with them other than
taking a defensive position like Dorment has done. We can
conclude that Anne Slaughter’s article is more convincing and
factual than Dorment’s article.
Reference
Dorment, Richard. "Why Men Still Can’t Have It All". Print.

11. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. Why Women Still Can't Have It All.
Print.