Unveiling Falcon Invoice Discounting: Leading the Way as India's Premier Bill...
Jql journal1
1. 1
JOURNAL QUALITY LIST
Fifty-third Edition, 8March 2015
Compiled and edited by ProfessorAnne-WilHarzing
The editor welcomes corrections and additions
Email: anne-wil@harzing.com
Website: http://www.harzing.com
Revision history
Fifty-third Edition, 8 March 2015
Fifty-second Edition, 11 February 2014
Fifty-first Edition, 10 December 2013
Fiftieth Edition, 5 July 2013
Forty-ninth Edition, 8 June 2013
Forty-eight Edition, 5 February 2013 (recalled, donotuse)
Forty-seventh Edition, 17 August 2012
Forty-sixth Edition, 13 July 2012
Forty-fifth Edition, 1 April 2012
Forty-fourth Edition, 5 March 2012
Forty-third Edition, 1 January 2012
Forty-second Edition, 16 October 2011
Forty-first Edition, 20 July 2011
Fortieth Edition, 17 June 2011
Thirty-ninth Edition, 23 April 2011
Thirty-eight Edition, 4 February 2011
Thirty-seventh Edition, 27 May 2010
Thirty-sixth Edition, 6 February 2010
Thirty-fifth Edition, 18 December 2009
Thirty-fourth Edition, 3 July 2009
Thirty-third Edition, 4 May 2009
Thirty-second Edition, 26 September 2008
Thirty-first Edition, 31 May 2008
Thirtieth Edition, 28 December 2007
Twenty-ninth Edition, 19 November 2007
Twenty-eighth Edition, 12 September 2007
Twenty-seventh Edition, 23 July 2007
Twenty-sixth Edition, 5 March 2007
Twenty-fifth Edition, 1 February 2007
Twenty-fourth Edition, 23 November 2006
Twenty-third Edition, 12 October 2006
Twenty-second Edition, 6 August 2006
Twenty-first Edition, 23 June 2006
Twentieth Edition, 7 May 2006
Nineteenth Edition, 7 March 2006
Eighteenth Edition, 6 January, 2006
Seventeenth Edition, 4 December, 2005
Sixteenth Edition, 13 November 2005
Fifteenth Edition, 23 July 2005
Fourteenth Edition, 28 March 2005
Thirteenth Edition, 10 January 2005
Twelfth Edition, 13 November 2004
Eleventh Edition, 11 July 2004
Tenth Edition, 9 June 2004
Ninth Edition, 6 April 2004
Eight Edition, 9 January 2004
Seventh Edition, 26 October 2003
Sixth Edition, 12 July 2003
Fifth Edition, 15 February 2003
Fourth Edition, 17 November, 2002
Third Edition, 18 July 2002
Second Edition, 13 October 2000
First Edition, 17 July 2000
Copyright 2000-2015Anne-WilHarzing. Allrights reserved.
Permission to use or copy this list in its entirety is hereby granted, provided that all copies include this title
page, copyright notice, and all explanatory notes. All other uses, copying, or other forms of reproduction are
prohibited.
2. 2
JOURNAL QUALITY LIST
Fifty-third Edition, 8 March 2015
Compiled and edited by Professor Anne-Wil Harzing, http://www.harzing.com
Introduction
The Journal Quality List is published primarily to assist academics to target papers at journals of
an appropriate standard. We would be concerned if the list were used for staff evaluation pur-
poses in a mechanistic way. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the
Journal Quality List, we recommend that it be checked before used extensively for evaluation
purposes. The editor will not be held responsible for omissions or errors.
Acknowledgements
The first version of the JQL was collated when the editor was with the University of Bradford
School of Management (UBSM). The editor gratefully acknowledges the assistance and contri-
butions of the following people: Kathy Cousens (UBSM) for the initial data entry work, Victoria
Lim, Ulrike Magner, Sebastian Reiche, Dinuka Wijetunga, Shea Fan, Sofie Schütte, Markus
Goelz (all University of Melbourne) and Sara de Marco (Middlesex University) for data entry
work between 2006 and 2015, Yves Barlette, Jos Benders, Yehuda Baruch, Malachy Carey,
Graham Hooley, Gunther Maier, and Andrew Kirchner for pointing out and supplying me with
various journal ranking lists and providing corrections.
Subjectareas and abbreviations
Abbreviation Subjectarea
Bus Hist Business History
Comm Communication
Economics Economics
Entrep Entrepreneurship
F&A Finance & Accounting
Gen & Strat General & Strategy
IB International Business
Innovation Innovation
Marketing Marketing
MIS, KM Management Information Systems, Knowledge Management
OB/OS, HRM, IR Organisation Behavior/Studies, Human Resource Management, In-
dustrial Relations
OR, MS & POM Operations Research, Management Science, Production & Opera-
tions Management
PSM Public Sector Management
Psychology Psychology
Sociology Sociology
Tourism Tourism
3. 3
DISCUSSION OF THE RANKINGS
[The 53rd edition removed several older rankings that were created between 2001-2005 and had
not been updated since by their providers. It also removed a range of journals in non-core Econom-
ics & Business areas that – after removing the older rankings – only appeared on a single ranking
list].
EJIS 2007 —European JournalofInformation Systems 2007
Mingers & Harzing
This list provides an integrated ranking of all journal rankings available in the JQL as at Decem-
ber 2005 (17th edition). The details of its construction as well as a range of additional analyses
have been published in the European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 4. An earlier
working paper is also available from http://www.harzing.com/papers.htm#jqlrank. Two rankings
are available (EJIS07 and EJIS07-CI); the second ranking includes the JIF for 2004 as part of
its analysis.
[Editor’s note] Some journals had to be removed from this analysis because they had a very lim-
ited number of rankings (e.g. all communication journals that were only ranked on the UQ list).
Further, many journals have been added to the JQL since this list was constructed. Hence, rat-
ings for some 200 journals are not available.
UQ 2007 —University ofQueensland JournalRating 2007
This list was originally constructed in 2003 in three stages:
1. Construction of a mega-database (over 2,000 titles) based on ratings and rankings from
over 120 sources.
2. Allocation of each title to one of 5 tiers (1 = highest, 5 = lowest) on the basis of the second
highest rating from the rating/ranking sources (i.e., the rating must be from at least two sour-
ces).
3. The data base was supplied to the six discipline cluster leaders in the school as a resource
that they could use to construct the official list (which comprises 588 journals). They could
use the mega-database or any other source to justify each journal's rating.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
4&5) of the UQ list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. An exception was made
for Entrepreneurship/Communication journals, since they were underrepresented in the other
ranking lists included in the JQL.
[Editor’s note] The JQL includes the updated (2007) version of the UQ list. Unfortunately, no in-
formation is available on the process that was followed in updating in the 2003 list.
Rank Interpretation
1 Highest quality rating
2
Intermediate quality ratings3
4
5 Lowest quality rating
AST 2008 —Aston March 2008
New version of the Aston lists originally published in 1999/2003/2006. The 1999 list was based
on a large survey of opinions of academics of the Midlands universities. In 2003 this list was
sent to Aston research convenors for discussion within their group and each group then sent in
revised lists which formed the basis of the new rankings. Anybody who wanted to add a journal
was asked to provide evidence, preferably citation evidence from the World of Knowledge Data
Base, but failing that expert opinions in the field from other universities. In the 2006 “rankings
4. 4
are made on the basis of citation rates, impact factors, interrogation of data bases and the eval-
uations of senior academic staff in Aston Business School and other international business
schools. They are subject to change as the standing and impact of journals changes.” No infor-
mation was available about the procedures for the 2008 update.
[Editor’s note] Journals that were mentioned on the Aston 2008 list, but not on any other list,
were only included if they had at least a 3 ranking. Law journals were excluded. Where journals
were ranked differently in different subdisciplines, the highest rating was used.]
Rank Interpretation
4 World leading
3 Internationally excellent
2 Recognised internationally
1 Recognised nationally
0 Unclassified
WIE 2008 —WU Wien JournalRating May 2008
List developed by the Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien (Vienna University of Economics and Busi-
ness Administration). For more information and the complete list see: http://bach.wu-
wien.ac.at/bachapp/cgi-bin/fides/fides.aspx/fides.aspx?journal=true;lang=DE
The 2001 journal list was updated in the context of an incentive scheme that provided financial
incentives for publication in top journals. As such the 2008 list only contains journals with an A+
and A ranking.
[Editor’s note] Journals that were mentioned on the WIE 2008 list, but were not included in the
JQL were only included if they had an A+ ranking.
Den 2011 —Danish Ministry Journallist2011
In collaboration with academics, the Danish Ministry publishes an annual list of journals it recog-
nizes as peer-reviewed and of a particular quality. It assessed those included in the list with ei-
ther a score of 1 (low) or 2 (high). Exact details of this list are unknown, but around 85 % of jour-
nals are scored 1, with the remaining 15% scored 2. Of the 900+ journals in the JQL more than
40% are scored 2, clearly indicating that the JQL tends to focus on high quality journals.
Rank Interpretation
2 Top journals
1 Other recognized journals
HEC 2011 —Hautes Études Commerciales de Paris Ranking ListJuly 2011
The overall approach to construct this list consisted of searching for an algorithm to combine the
different sources of information in a standardized way across all journals of all fields. These
sources were expert opinions (solicited from outside of HEC), existing rankings, and journal im-
pact factors. Borderline cases were then discussed and some corrections made. All corrections
were based on additional factual information (e.g. acceptance rates, evolution of impact factors).
The following five existing ranking were used:
ABS — Association of Business Schools Academic Journal Quality Guide
CNRS — Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (2008), section 37, Economics and Man-
agement
ERIM — Erasmus Research Institute of Management Journals Listing (2006)
FT— Financial Times Journal List (2010)
VHB — Verband der Hochschullehrer für Betriebswirtschaft (2008)
5. 5
A detailed description of the method is available at the following address: www.hec.edu/li-
brary/HEC‐journal‐list‐method
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
B-C) of the HEC list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. The same principle
was applied to French-language journals. Also excluded were journals in the area of law and
statistics (unless related to Business & Economics).
Rank Interpretation
A Highest quality rating
B+
Intermediate quality ratings
B
C Lowest quality rating
UQ 2011 —University ofQueensland Adjusted ERA Rankings List
This list is a combination of the UQ 2007 list and the ERA (Excellence in Research Australia)
list. Information on the ERA list is available at: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_journal_list.htm. It
is a "Revised ERA" list in that some journals are ranked higher on the UQBS journal list and
their higher score is maintained, but no journal is ranked lower than its ranking on the ERA list
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
3&4) of the UQ list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. The UQ list also in-
cluded some professional journals, but these were only ranked if they were already included in
the JQL.
Rank Interpretation
1 Highest quality rating, A* ERA
2 Intermediate quality rating, A ERA
3 Intermediate quality rating, B ERA
4 Lowest quality rating, C ERA
VHB 2011 —Assoc. ofProfessors ofBusiness in German speaking coun-
tries
A ranking developed on behalf of the Association of University Professors of Business in Ger-
man speaking countries (Verband der Hochschullehrer für Betriebswirtschaft - VHB). This ver-
sion (VHB-JOURQUAL 2.1) is an update of the second edition (2008). Rankings of journals on
the list were not updated, but new journals were added. For details about the update, see:
http://vhbonline.org/service/jourqual/vhb-jourqual-21-2011/
Details a about the procedures followed in the second edition (2008) are available here:
http://www.business-research.org/2009/2/01jourqual2/2166
There is an English-language article on the second edition of the VHB-JOURQUAL which is
published as: Schrader, U.; Hennig-Thurau, T. (2009) VHB-JOURQUAL2: Method, Results, and
Implications of the German Academic Association for Business Research's Journal Ranking,
BuR - Business Research, Official Open Access Journal of VHBVerband der Hochschullehrer
für Betriebswirtschaft e.V, Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2009, pp. 180-204.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
B-E) of the VHB list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. The same principle
was applied to German-language journals. The list also included a range of Engineering and
Computer Science as well as Health journals that were not included in the JQL as they were
seen as less relevant to Management/Business/Economics.
6. 6
Rank Interpretation
A+ VHB-JourQual Index 9
A VHB-JourQual Index 8
B VHB-JourQual Index 7
C VHB-JourQual Index 6
D VHB-JourQual Index 5
E VHB-JourQual Index < 5
AERES 2012 —Agence d’évaluation de la recherche etde l’enseignementsu-
périeur(17 Oct2012)
The AERES journal list has been constructed by the section 37 of the CNRS, in consultation
with academics from institutions such as CNRS, INRA and CNU. It has continuously evolved
over time. The 2012 update is a combination of the CNRS 2011 and FNEG 2011 list. Journals
ranked 1*, 1 or 2 on these lists were classified as A, journals ranked 3 as B, and journals ranked
4 as C. As such there is less differentiation in the highest rank than in other journal rankings
with more than a third of the ranked journals (20% of the journals on the list is unranked) in the
highest (A) category.
In order to be qualified as research active, academics generally have to publish at least three
items, including at least two articles in a five year period in journals on the AERES list if they
have a teaching & research contract and at least five items, including at least three articles in
five years if they have a research only contract.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranked
B, C or unranked) of the AERES 2012 list were only added if they already featured in the JQL.
Journals in Law, Agricultural/Energy Economics and Health that were not already included in
other lists in Business and Management were also excluded as were French journals. Similar to
many French rankings, the list seems to have a rather strong emphasis on Economics and
many of the journals in Management & Marketing are ranked much lower than on other lists.
Cra 2012 —Cranfield University SchoolofManagement
February 2012 (9th ed)
This list provides guidelines to staff on which journals they should consider submitting their pa-
pers to. It should be noted that the grading for each journal is the School’s view, and guided the
School’s submission to the RAE 2008. The projected grading has been produced using a large
number of internal and external sources, including journal impact factors.
[Editor’s note] If a journal of the Cranfield list was not already included in the JQL (which was
rare), it was only added if it had a score of 3 or 4.
Rank Interpretation
4 World leading
3 Top international
2 Lower international
1 National
EJL 2012 —Erasmus Research Institute ofManagementJournals Listing
The strategic purpose of the ERIM Journals List is to contribute to the quality of the scientific
output of ERIM and to the academic reputation of the institute (see http://www.erim.eur.nl/ejl).
The ERIM Journals List (EJL) helps to define the core domain of ERIM and provides direction
as to the type of publications that ERIM would like to produce. The practical purpose is to guar-
antee to the ERIM members and aspirant members that publications in the journals of the EJL
will qualify for membership. The EJL is believed to cover the whole field of research in manage-
7. 7
ment, as far as the ERIM research programs are concerned. This does not imply that no credit
will be given for publications in journals that are not on the EJL. It is impossible to make an ex-
haustive list of all the journals in the domain of research in management. The ERIM journal list
is based on judgment by peers and (ISI) impact scores.
The first edition of the list came out in 2002. In 2011 ERIM solicited proposals from each re-
search program for the fourth edition of the list. Five journals were upgraded to STAR, 12 jour-
nals were upgraded to P, and three journals were downgraded to S. Four new PA journals were
added and a new category (M*) was created. 31 S journals were removed from the list.
[Editor’s note] If a journal of the EJIM list was not already included in the JQL (which apart from
half a dozen Dutch journals was rare), it was only added if it had a score of STAR or P(A).
Rank Interpretation
STAR Top journals among P
P Best journals in the field
P A Top international journals (aspirant). By 1/1/2016 these journals will be trans-
ferred to the secondary list unless ISI with high impact has been attained
S Scientific refereed journals of a recognized academic reputation that do not
reach the quality levels of the Primary Set
M* Top managerial journal
ABDC 2013 —Australian Business Deans CouncilJournalRankings List
November2013
The ABDC Journal List is a collaborative list developed by the Australian Business Deans Coun-
cil that seeks to list journals relevant to Australian business academics and group these journals
into four quality categories ranging in descending order from:
Rank Interpretation
A* Best or leading journal in its field - publishes outstanding, original and rigorous
research that will shape the field. Acceptance rates are typically low and the edi-
torial board is dominated by leading scholars in the field or subfield, including
from top institutions in the world. Where relevant to the field or subfield, the jour-
nal has the highest impact factors or other indices of high reputation.
A Highly regarded journal in the field or subfield - publishes excellent research in
terms of originality, significance and rigour, has competitive submission and ac-
ceptance rates, excellent refereeing process and where relevant to the field or
subfield, has higher than average impact factors. Not all highly regarded journals
have high impact factors, especially those in niche areas.
B Well regarded journal in the field or subfield - publishes research of a good
standard in terms of originality, significance and rigour and papers are fully refer-
eed according to good standards and practices but acceptance rates are higher
than for Tiers A* and A. Depending on the field or sub-field, will have a modest
impact factor and will be ISI listed.
C A recognised journal - publishes research that is of a modest standard and/or is
yet to establish its reputation because of its newness. This tier is more inclusive
than the others but only includes refereed journals.
The 2010 ABDC Journal List has been developed after wide consultation across the sector and
stakeholders. The following organisations provided input into the process:
Australian Council of Professors and Heads of Information Systems (ACPHIS)
Accounting & Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ)
Association of Industrial Relations of Australia and New Zealand (AIRAANZ)
Australia and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM)
Australia and New Zealand Communication Association (ANZCA)
Australia and New Zealand International Business Academy (ANZIBA)
8. 8
Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC)
Australian Society for the Study of Labour History (ASSLH)
Council of Law Deans (CLD)
Council for Australian University Tourism and Hospitality Education (CAUTHE)
Economics Society of Australia (ESA)
Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS)
Public Relations Institute of Australia (PRIA)
Sport Management Association of Australia and New Zealand (SMAANZ)
Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand (SEAANZ)
Society of Organisational Behaviour Australia (SOBA
The 2013 revision followed a similarly comprehensive process, which was supported by public
submissions according to a standard template, (all available here:
http://www.abdc.edu.au/29.116.0.0.1.0.htm), qualitative and quantitative data assessment, pub-
lic exposure feedback and international expert consultation.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
B and C) of the ABDC list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. Also excluded
were journals in the area of law, education (unless related to Management), psychology (unless
related to OB), general social sciences (unless related to Management),statistics (unless related
to Economics or Management) and medicine.
FNEG 2013 —Foundation Nationalpourl’Enseignementde la Gestion des
Entreprises, version June 2013
A ranking created by the French Management Association to complement the CNRS list, which
is oriented more towards Science and Economics. The FNEGE Scientific Board includes all the
Academic Associations of Management representing the community of researchers in the field.
The list of scientific journals below is unanimously supported by the 14 scientific associations of
the discipline with the shared desire to obtain a categorization that reflects as accurately as pos-
sible the specificity of management as a science. This unanimous support from a whole scien-
tific community confers high legitimacy on it.
In creating the list, the Association combined peer review with reference to a wide range of
French and international journal rankings (all included in the JQL) as well as bibliometric indica-
tors (ISI Journal Impact Factor, Google Scholar h-index, SCImago SJR).
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (2-4)
were only added if they already featured in the JQL. The same principle was applied to French-
language journals. Also excluded were journals in the area of health, politics, and medicine.]
Rank Interpretation
1* Most notable management journals with a prominent position (only 8 journals)
1 Most notable management journals, very selective and particularly recognized
in France and abroad
2 Highly selective journals with a very demanding peer review process
3 Very good journals with a good scientific reputation and significant contribu-
tions
4 Good journals with good selectivity and original contributions
CNRS 2014 —Centre Nationalde la Recherche Scientifique (www.cnrs.fr)
November2014 (version 4.03)
7th update of the ranking of journals in Economics and Business constructed by the French
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. The list of journals was constructed through con-
sultation with experts in the field, both in France and abroad. Directors of the various research
groups (and through them the researchers in these groups) were consulted in an iterative proc-
ess. Rankings of foreign universities were also consulted as well as listings such as SSCI and
EconLit. Only academic peer-reviewed journals were included in the list and hence it excludes
9. 9
high-ranked professional journals such as Harvard Business Review. Rankings are based on
several criteria: academic reputation, audience and impact. For more information and the full list
see: https://www.gate.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/Categorisation37_Nov2014-2-1.pdf
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
2-4) of the CNRS list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. Journals in Law, Agri-
cultural/Energy Economics and Health that were not already included in other lists were also ex-
cluded, as were French journals.
Previous lists appeared to have a rather strong bias towards Economics and (to a lesser extent)
towards the more quantitative fields of Business (Finance & Accounting, IS and Operations Re-
search). This bias has been partially addressed in the new list. Many journals in Management &
Marketing were upgraded, whilst several journals in Finance & Accounting were downgraded.
Even so Management & Marketing still appears to be somewhat undervalued in comparison to
other ranking lists in the JQL.
Rank Interpretation
1* Highest quality rating (only 14 journals were given this ranking)
1
Intermediate quality ratings2
3
4 Lowest quality rating
Ess 2015 —ESSEC Business SchoolParis January 2015
ESSEC is one of the top French business schools. Its first journal ranking list was established
20 years ago. The current list is dated 21.01.2015. The ranking of a journal was decided by a
committee of seven ESSEC professors with outstanding performance in research. Factors con-
sidered are the aim and scope of the journal, the quality of its board, the SCCI impact factor, ex-
ternal opinions about the journal, quality of the papers, readership, scale of distribution in libra-
ries, journal lifetime, refereeing process, etc. Although it is based on a relatively small number of
key informants, the list was included to provide a French perspective on journal rankings.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (1-3)
were only added if they already featured in the JQL. Also excluded were journals in the area of
law, politics, mathematics, computing (unless related to OR), psychology (unless related to OB),
and medicine as well as most French journals. Several journals had to be excluded because
their titles were ambiguous and/or could not be found in public sources.]
Ran
k
Interpretation
0+ Recognised internationally as the best in the discipline
0 Excellence at a level close to the top journals in the field
1 High level scientific journals of international reputation and circulation
2 Generally national-circulation journals, or international journals of lesser reputation
3 Journals with a very narrow circulation or low profile.
ABS 2015 —Association ofBusiness Schools Academic JournalQuality
Guide February 2015
The first version of this list was published by Bristol Business School in June 2004, while the
second version appeared in 2005 as the Harvey Morris Business Journals List. The original list
stems from an analysis of where UK academics declared publications for the purposes of RAE
2001. Other journals were then added through comparison with other lists in circulation. Rank-
ings in these lists were standardized at this stage, bearing in mind the UK RAE 2008 classifica-
tion of research outputs as 4* (best work in the field), 3* (international excellence), 2* (interna-
tionally recognised) 1* (nationally recognised).
In converting the second edition of the HM List to the ABS list the editors followed a nine stage
procedure involving significant peer review and review of the quality standards, track records,
10. 10
contents and processes of each journal. For the 2nd (March 2008), 3rd edition (March 2009), 4th
edition (March 2010) and 5th edition (February 2015) a review panel of experts considered feed-
back from academic associations, publishers and individual academics. For further details see
the Introduction to the guide accessible here:
http://www.bizschooljournals.com/
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (1 and 2)
were only added if they already featured in the JQL. Also excluded were journals in the area of
law, education (unless related to Management), psychology (unless related to OB), general so-
cial sciences (unless related to Management) and medicine.
Rank Interpretation
4* A world elite journal
4 A top journal
3 A highly regarded journal
2 A well regarded journal
1 A recognised journal
FinancialTimes Survey ofTop Business Schools 2006/2010
Journals used by the Financial Times to compile their lists of top Business Schools are marked
with an asterisk in the JQL and are listed below. Journals in bold were added in 2010. Journals
in brackets were removed in 2010.
Academy of Management Perspectives (Academy of Management/OUP)
Academy of Management Journal (Academy of Management, Ada, Ohio)
Academy of Management Review (Academy of Management)
Accounting, Organisations and Society (Elsevier)
Administrative Science Quarterly (Cornell University)
California Management Review (UC Berkeley)
Contemporary Accounting Research (Wiley)
Econometrica (Econometric Society, University of Chicago)
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (Baylor University, Waco, Texas)
Harvard Business Review (Harvard Business School Publishing)
Human Resource Management (John Wiley and Sons)
Information Systems Research (Informs)
[International Journal of Human Resource Management (Routledge)]
Journal of Accounting and Economics (Elsevier)
Journal of Accounting Research (University of Chicago)
Journal of Applied Psychology (American Psychological Association)
Journal of Business Venturing (Elsevier)
Journal of Consumer Research (University of Chicago)
Journal of Consumer Psychology (Elsevier)
Journal of Finance (Blackwell)
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Journal of Financial Economics (Elsevier)
Journal of International Business Studies (Academy of International Business)
Journal of Management Studies (Wiley)
Journal of Marketing (American Marketing Association)
Journal of Marketing Research (American Marketing Association)
Journal of Operations Management (Elsevier)
Journal of Political Economy (University of Chicago)
Journal of the American Statistical Association (American Statistical Association)
[Management International Review (Gabler)]
Management Science (Informs)
Marketing Science (Informs)
MIS Quarterly (Mgmnt Information Systems Research Centre, University of Minnesota)
11. 11
Operations Research (Informs)
Organization Science (Informs)
Organization Studies (Sage)
Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes (Academic Press)
Production & Operations Management (POMS)
Quarterly Journal of Economics (MITPress)
Review of Accounting Studies (Springer)
Review of Financial Studies (Oxford University Press)
Sloan Management Review (MIT)
Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley and Sons)
The Accounting Review (American Accounting Association)
The American Economic Review (American Economic Association, Nashville)
The Journal of Business Ethics (Kluwer Academic)
The Rand Journal (The Rand Corporation)