Bank of Montreal v Duguid (2000), 47 OR (3d) 737 (CA), 120001 0J No 1356 (QL), leave to appeal to SCC granted, (2000) SCCB 2238; notice of discontinuance filed (2001) SCCB 141DISCUSSION QUESTION: Do you think that the loan aside based on undue influence. The dissent was correct to assess Mrs. Duguids dissent said that while Mrs. Duguid did not emotional reasons for cosigning the loan? repose trust and confidence in her husband Or do you prefer the majority's focus on Mrs. in the classic sense, she did fear "destroying Duguid's relatively sophisticated background the relationship between herself and her as a real estate agent?6 case study.