2. Executive Summary
Launch the Ciabatta line internationally
Ciabatta ranked the highest in the test market survey
Ciabatta had a steady average return of 3.69%
3. Fall Festival Survey Results
Ciabatta had the best overall survey results (about 67%)
Café Classic only did best on Value $ - with 68% vs. 58%
Fall Festival Market Test Research Research Weights
Line Ciabatta Holiday Café Weight 1 Weight 2 Weight 3
Overall Liking 72% 65% 42% 20% 20% 15%
Value $ 58% 36% 68% 10% 10% 10%
Overall Appearance 64% 68% 41% 10% 10% 10%
Overall Taste 81% 75% 54% 10% 10% 10%
Amount of Food 78% 84% 61% 10% 10% 10%
Future Purchase Intent 59% 56% 37% 20% 15% 20%
Visitation Impact 63% 50% 26% 20% 25% 25%
Average 68% 62% 47% 100% 100% 100%
Weight 1 67% 61% 43%
Weight 2 67% 60% 43%
Weight 3 66% 60% 43%
4. Ciabatta had the fewest strong negative responses (6%)
Café Classic had the most strong negative responses (17%)
Fall Festival Market Test Research Research Weights
Line Ciabatta Holiday Café Weight 1 Weight 2 Weight 3
Overall Liking 7% 8% 41% 20% 20% 15%
Value $ 14% 23% 14% 10% 10% 10%
Overall Appearance 5% 17% 27% 10% 10% 10%
Overall Taste 2% 6% 14% 10% 10% 10%
Amount of Food 5% 2% 13% 10% 10% 10%
Future Purchase Intent 4% 18% 11% 20% 15% 20%
Visitation Impact 0% 2% 3% 20% 25% 25%
Average 5% 11% 18% 100% 100% 100%
Weight 1 5% 10% 18%
Weight 2 5% 10% 17%
Weight 3 4% 10% 16%
5. Café Classic and Ciabatta showed positive pre/post net control results
from the test
Average Pre/Post Net Control
Line DMA Avg Pre/Post Net Control Avg
Line
Ciabatta Miami 3.65%
Denver 5.35% 4.65%
Indianapolis 4.95%
Holiday Sacramento -4.05%
Hartford -1.74% -2.42%
Portland -1.45%
Café Classic Las Vegas 6.28%
Seattle 5.18% 6.71%
San Diego 8.66%
6. Café Classic Pre/Post Net Control & Breakeven
Comparison
Café Classic showed a 5.54% increase in traffic above the break even
Café Classic Performance
Company Avg CM $ 5.21
Line Weighted CM $ 4.74
Loss Per Sale $ 0.47
Avg Plates Sold In Test 550.77
Total Loss $ 259.78
Line Margin $ 4.76
Break Even In Additional Customers 54.61
Company AW Guest Count 4672
Break Even In Customers 1.17%
Pre/Post Net of Control 6.71%
Net Above/Below Breakeven 5.54%
7. Ciabatta
Ciabatta showed a 3.69% traffic increase above the break even
Ciabatta Line Perfomance
Company Avg CM $ 5.21
Line Weighted CM $ 4.55
Loss Per Sale $ 0.66
Avg Plates Sold In Test 309.82
Total Loss $ 204.48
Line Margin $ 4.57
Break Even In Add. Cust. 44.74
Company AW Guest Count 4672
Break Even In Customers 0.96%
Pre/Post Net of Control 4.65%
Net Above/Below Breakeven 3.69%
8. Conclusion
The Café Classic line shows great traffic increases but
had very poor test market survey results
The survey data showed that Ciabatta was ranked the
highest in the test market survey and Ciabatta had a
3.69% return
9. Recommendation
Launch the Ciabatta line nationally to avoid
gambling with the Café Classic line
Reasoning: The Café Classic line seems to involve
somewhat of a gamble according to the test market
survey data, while the Ciabatta line seems to be a
more sure long term gain
10. Appendix
How company average CM was derived
How the average product line CM was derived
Pre/Post Net Control Methodology
11. How The Company Average CM Was Derived
Company Avg Contribution Margin
Sandwiches Avg Margin
AWPC Percent Weighted CM
Toulouse Turkey $ 5.30 101 8.09% 0.43
Chicken Salad $ 4.54 127 10.17% 0.46
Old World Veggie $ 4.95 88 7.05% 0.35
Black Forest Ham & Swiss $ 5.51 148 11.85% 0.65
Swiss Dip $ 5.27 64 5.12% 0.27
Classic Reuben $ 4.97 106 8.49% 0.42
Prosciutto & Asiago $ 5.27 104 8.33% 0.44
Manet's Seaside $ 5.19 87 6.97% 0.36
Portabello Panini $ 4.89 120 9.61% 0.47
Sicilian Salami $ 5.21 67 5.36% 0.28
Cordon Bleu $ 5.74 141 11.29% 0.65
Parmesan Beef $ 5.54 96 7.69% 0.43
Totals $ 5.20 1249 100% $ 5.21
12. How the Average Product Line Contribution
Margin Was Derived
Took the weighted averages of the sandwiches in each product line
Miami Ciabatta Weighted Average Contribution Margin
Avg Weekly Plate Count Plates Percent CM Weights
Rosemary Chicken 232 54.0% $ 4.57 2.4678
Garden Mozz 69 16.0% $ 4.68 0.7488
Glazed Pork 129 30.0% $ 4.46 1.338
Totals 429 100% $ 4.57 $ 4.55
Took the weighted averages of the three DMA’s for the product line
Ciabatta Avg. Cont. Margin
DMA Cont. Margin
Miami $ 4.55
Denver $ 4.59
Indianapolis $ 4.53
Average $ 4.56
13. Pre/Post Net Control Methodology
Miami DMA Avg Weekly Traffic Miami Ciabatta Pre/Post Net Control
2010 2011 Avg Pre Growth Avg Pre Avg Post Avg Post Pre/Post Pre/Post Net Control
Wk 1 3510 3468 -80 -1.90% 80 1.50% 3.40% 3.65%
Wk 2 3615 3559
Wk 3 3998 3934 -63.9713 -1.60%
Wk 4 3865 3775 -89.7894 -2.32%
Wk 5 3960 3872 -88.4831 -2.23%
Wk 6
Wk 7
3915
4145
3820
4057
-95.2966
-87.3947
-2.43%
-2.11% • Took the average change from pre/post
Wk 8 4298 4213 -85.43 -1.99% periods, subtracted the average pre period
Wk 9 4399 4313 -85.9736 -1.95%
Wk 10 4341 4225 -116.169 -2.68% change from the post period to get the
Wk 11
Wk 12
4416
4465
4318
4376
-97.7289
-89.5742
-2.21%
-2.01%
Pre/Post numbers.
Wk 13 4471 4438 -32.2339 -0.72%
Wk 14 4591 4566 -25.0687 -0.55%
Wk 15 4665 4640 • Then I net the pre/post with the average
Wk 16 4804 4796 pre/post change of the control which was
Wk 17 4865 4871
Wk 18 4861 4907 46 0.94% derived using the same method.
Wk 19 4922 4982 61 1.23%
Wk 20 5222 5297 75 1.44%
Wk 21 5296 5384 88 1.65%
Wk 22 5434 5520 86 1.58%
Wk 23 5520 5614 94 1.70%
Wk 24 5520 5614 94 1.70%
Wk 25 5521 5618 97 1.76%