SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
Download to read offline
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
2 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
1.0 PURPOSE .............................................................................................................4
2.0 SCOPE ..................................................................................................................4
3.0 OVERVIEW ...........................................................................................................5
3.1 General.............................................................................................................................5
3.2 Weekly / Daily Reviews ....................................................................................................5
3.3 Modelling Scope...............................................................................................................6
3.4 3D Model Output ..............................................................................................................7
3.5 Review & Comments Recording ......................................................................................8
4.0 DESIGN MILESTONES ........................................................................................8
5.0 30% MODEL REVIEW..........................................................................................9
5.1 30% Review Stage Requirements....................................................................................9
5.2 Modelling & Review........................................................................................................10
5.3 Outcome & Objectives....................................................................................................11
6.0 60% MODEL REVIEW........................................................................................12
6.1 60% Review Stage Requirements..................................................................................12
6.2 Modelling & Review........................................................................................................13
6.3 Outcome & Objectives....................................................................................................14
7.0 90% MODEL REVIEW........................................................................................15
7.1 90% Review Stage Requirements..................................................................................15
7.2 Modelling & Review........................................................................................................16
7.3 Outcome & Objectives....................................................................................................17
8.0 MILESTONES SCOPE MATRIX.........................................................................18
8.1 Piping and Mechanical: ..................................................................................................18
8.2 Building Services:...........................................................................................................19
8.3 Civil and Structural: ........................................................................................................20
8.4 Architectural: ..................................................................................................................22
8.5 Electrical:........................................................................................................................23
8.6 Instrumentation:..............................................................................................................24
9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTATION (REFERENCES)..............................................25
10.0 RECORDS...........................................................................................................25
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
3 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
PAGE COUNT
Document No. No. of Pages
Main Document
SING-WI-LL-24 25
Related Documents
WI-LL-24f1 1
WI-LL-24f2 1
WI-LL-24f3 1
WI-LL-24f4 1
Sub-Total 4
TOTAL PAGES 25 + 4 = 29
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
4 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Work Instruction is to establish the procedures for the review of the
3D model.
2.0 SCOPE
This Work Instruction describes procedures and guidelines for review of the 3D model
and is applicable to all projects where PDS 3D software is being utilized for design.
Note: Although, this procedure is primarily applicable to PDS, similar guidelines can be extended to other modelling
software such as AUTOPLANT and PDMS with appropriate considerations to issues that are software specific.
 Refer to WI-LL-24f2 for the 3D Workflow Diagram
Inputs required for 3D model development, design progress to be made and output
expectations from the model at various stages of completion are identified.
 The stages of the 3D model reviews are milestones and expressed in terms of
percentage, not necessarily equal to percentage of engineering progress made.
 The objectives of the 3D model review are to ensure:-
 Design has progressed to the expected stage as planned
 Model incorporates progress made in design and vendor data available to date
 Design meets all process functionality, engineering and HSE requirements
 Constructability, Operability and Maintainability requirements are incorporated
 Standardized design philosophies are utilized across the project
 Client’s Standards, as applicable, are adhered
 Modelled work is clash free and inter-discipline interfaces are incorporated
 Design deficiencies are clearly identified
 Time based path forward for resolving open items
 This document lists the roles and responsibilities of all engineering disciplines and
their contributions towards successful completion of the 3D model. All disciplines
(Piping, Process, Mechanical, Civil, Architectural, Electrical, Instrumentation and
Building Services and DTS) shall be actively involved during the reviews.
 Inputs required to reach each milestone completion are identified.
 Modelling and review expectations of the 3D model and the outcomes and
objectives of each milestone completion are listed.
 These formal reviews shall be treated as important milestones for Project schedule.
All stake holders i.e. Technology (Licensor), Engineering, Projects, Construction,
Operations and Maintenance departments shall participate in these sessions.
 These formal reviews do not substitute regular weekly review sessions and these
are not line by line reviews.
 The review methodology, review agenda and participants for each formal review
shall be discussed and agreed with the Client before the review.
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
5 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
3.0 OVERVIEW
3.1 General
3.1.1 It is essential to conduct formal Client reviews of the 3D model at appropriate pre-fixed
time intervals throughout the duration of the project and get Client’s approval for the
design that is completed.
3.1.2 Depending upon the size of the project and the number of units involved, the project
may be divided into sub-areas so that the 3D model reviews can be conducted
independently. The Client’s Project Managers and Jacob’s Project Engineering
Managers shall be the focal point of contact for all reviews, comments and close outs.
3.1.3 NAVISWORKS software shall be used for the formal model reviews.
3.1.4 The formal model reviews shall be conducted over a period of three to five working
days, depending on each area.
3.2 Weekly / Daily Reviews
3.2.1 Apart from formal model reviews, weekly model reviews shall continue throughout the
project duration to address ongoing action points and monitor progress and quality of
the 3D model.
3.2.2 An action log (WI-LL-24f4) shall be maintained by the Project Engineering Manager to
record and track the weekly model review comments for all the disciplines. Actions that
are completed shall be suitably tagged. The completed and/or tagged action points shall
be reviewed in the successive sessions and closed out.
3.2.3 Separate line wise reviews shall also be conducted to ensure that the line modelling is
consistent with inputs (mainly process) and checked for stress, accessibility of valves
and instruments, supporting is taken care of, slopes, no-pocket and specific
requirements are adhered to and all holds & assumptions are documented.
3.2.4 During these reviews, checks shall be done to ensure that the model is updated in line
with latest vendor documents and with agreed comments of previous review sessions.
3.2.5 Line wise checking requires more time. It may not be feasible to check and obtain
approval for lines modelled during the entire week, during the weekly review sessions.
Therefore, at some point of time during the execution of the project, daily reviews will be
required. Based on the checking backlog of modelled lines, the PEM / Lead Engineer
shall discuss and agree upon the requirement for daily reviews with the Client’s PM.
The focus of the daily reviews must be to check / approve all the lines modelled during
the previous days and clear the backlogs.
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
6 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
3.2.6 Lines that are checked and approved shall be ‘locked’ in the 3D model to prevent
unauthorized modifications and to control further changes. This could only be done at a
certain stage of the model. That is, certain lines could be locked after 60% model review
and later during reviews that are called specifically to approve lines and lock them either
by area or system wise.
3.2.7 A working copy of the line list shall be maintained and duly updated to record and track
line wise review comments and balance points (including holds and assumptions).
3.2.8 NAVISWORKS software shall be used for the weekly and daily model reviews
3.3 Modelling Scope
3.3.1 Entire plant shall be modelled. The exceptions are listed as below. Intention is to get
quality output documents that have undergone multi-disciplinary checks and reviewed
by technology, construction and operations and maintenance departments.
3.3.2 All above ground work and underground services shall be modelled. Piling shall be
modelled to a depth of 5 meters to ensure that all underground services are clash free
3.3.3 Non-process buildings may not be modelled. However, these buildings outlines shall be
modelled as shell/envelope with coordinates. Process buildings interiors such as
electrical/ instrumentation rooms, office rooms and similar enclosed rooms will not be
modelled. Only their encompassing walls shall be modelled.
3.3.4 Building services, electrical and instrumentation equipment installed outside shall be
modelled as envelopes only, for space & interface management.
3.3.5 Extent of items to be modelled has to be agreed with the client during scope definition.
The following should be treated as a guideline only.
 All sizes of piping (with insulation, as applicable)
(Tubing will not be modeled. Only manifolds will be modeled)
 All equipment (including portable equipment, as applicable)
(The extent of modeling of vendor package units must be discussed and agreed)
 All inline items
 All supports
 All piles, trenches, substructure and superstructure
(Concrete rebars, anchor bolts, etc details are not to be modeled. They are only modeled to
shape)
 All steel structural work, including platforms, stairs, walkways, ladders, chequered
plates, gratings, handrails, openings
 Floor slopes, Roads, paving, drains, space for trees and plants
 Buildings (refer to clause 3.3.3). External walls – brick walls, cladding, windows,
louvers, doors, openings for cables, piping, ducts and other services
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
7 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
 Main and branch cable trays (≥100 mm width), spaces for conduits (≥ Ø50 mm),
raceways and tubing/ tubing trays (≥100 mm width)
 Offline instruments (modeled by piping as per input given by Instrumentation)
 Instrument stands, manifolds, Field local panels, junction boxes, remote I/O panels
 Electrical light fittings with supports, street lights with poles, stanchion mounted
lights with stanchions
(Supports could be modeled as spaces. Intention is not to produce support drawings from
the model, but to provide spaces clash-free)
 Field electrical panels, JB, socket outlets, control stations and similar with supports
 Fire protection system equipment such as pumps, FW tanks, hydrants, hose boxes,
monitors, foam tanks, operating platforms, valve manifolds, deluge outlets,
sprinklers, all Fire protection systems piping
 Process and non-process duct work in all areas (except those inside non-process
buildings and areas excluded for modeling. See clause 3.3.3 above)
 Envelopes for safety and escape routes, maintenance spaces
 Spaces for ambulance parking, ambulance and Fire engine movements, loading/
unloading trucks, vans and similar ones parked inside the plant
 Spaces and travel path for mobile and portable equipments
 Spaces and travel path for crane / hoist hooks, taking into account the size of the
item or equipment that is to be carried / handled
 Spaces for temporary storage of materials during shutdown and normal operation
and maintenance of plant and lay down yards
 Interface with external / Third party suppliers and service providers
3.3.6 It is the responsibility of the DTS group to set up the PDS model volumes and also
define the naming procedures at the very onset. The DTS group will prepare and issue
for every project, a document which clearly describes the model volume nomenclature.
3.4 3D Model Output
3.4.1 The Intention of the formal reviews and the weekly / daily reviews is to get quality output
documents that have undergone multi-disciplinary checks and reviewed by technology,
construction and operations and maintenance departments.
3.4.2 All 2D layout type drawings developed for the project shall have their coordinates (X-
refs) extracted from 3D only. None of the 2D layout type drawings shall be developed
independently. This is mandatory requirement for ensuring consistency between the
drawings issued for the project.
(Appropriate considerations to issues that are software specific must be applied).
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
8 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
3.4.3 Documents that are extracted from 3D model are listed below. However, this is only a
guideline and depends upon project and modelling scope.
 Plot plans  Equipment layouts  Piping layouts
 Isometrics  Nozzle Orientation drawings  Support detail drawings
 MTO
 Structural steel drawings  Platform drawings
 Cable tray layouts (will include field panels, JB, etc)  Lighting layouts (will include field
panels)  Instrument location plans (will include field panels, RIO cabinets, JB, etc)
 Ducting layouts  Sprinkler & deluge location plans  Fire hydrant/monitor location
plans
 X-refs/ Base lines for all 2D layout drawings
3.5 Review & Comments Recording
3.5.1 The comments that are generated during the formal model reviews shall be properly
documented in a defined manner.
3.5.2 The spreadsheet WI-LL-24f1 shall be used for recording all the review comments. Refer
to Section 9.0 of this Work Instruction.
3.5.3 After each review, all comments shall be compiled together by the Project Engineering
Manager into a model review action report and circulated to all disciplines and to Client.
This will be the checklist (or punch list) for incorporation into 3D model and closing out
all the action points.
3.5.4 Once the action points in the spreadsheet are closed, then no further change in the
design is expected.
3.5.5 The comments and actions of the weekly reviews shall be maintained as a Weekly
Action Log (WI-LL-24f4) by the Project Engineering Manager. Refer to Section 9.0 of
this Work Instruction.
4.0 DESIGN MILESTONES
 The 3D model shall be formally reviewed with the Client at three milestone stages of
completion. The stages are 30%, 60% and finally 90%.
 Incorporation of the formal model review comments and close out shall be the
foremost action point for the subsequent stage.
 Completion of formal model review and incorporation of all comments and close out
shall be the indicator of the design completed at that stage.
 Once the model is reviewed and client approval is obtained on the closure of
comments, then design for that stage shall be treated as Frozen. Subsequent
changes to previously reviewed and approved designs shall be strictly restricted and
controlled. Necessary change management system shall be enforced.
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
9 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
5.0 30% MODEL REVIEW
The main focus of the 30% model review is on layout, accessibility, space allocation,
safety, ergonomics, operability, maintainability, constructability.
5.1 30% Review Stage Requirements
5.1.1 Following are required to reach 30% milestone completion:-
 Basic Engineering stage modelling basis
 Client’s Specific Design requirements (as applicable)
 Project Design Basis
 Initial concepts and studies
 Building design concepts (footprints, elevations)
 Tie-in locations (to external facilities)
 IFD P&ID
 IFD Line List & Tie-In list
 IFD PDS and/or MDS
 IFD Project Specifications
 IFD Piping Material Specifications
 IFD Plot Plan and Equipment Layouts
 Piping Support Standards
 Insulation Specification
(Insulation thicknesses for piping and equipment)
 Preliminary or reference data for piping speciality items
 Preliminary or reference data for rotating equipments
 Preliminary or reference data for Vendor Package items
 Preliminary data for HVAC systems (fans, blowers, etc.)
 Main E/I cable trays sizing
 Ductwork philosophy
 Space management philosophy
 Fire protection and fire fighting systems philosophy
 Underground philosophy
(Piping, cable routing, duct banks, drainage, road crossing, piling, trenching, depths)
5.1.2 The model shall be clash checked and major clashes shall be resolved prior to formal
review. At 30% review stage, lot of data is not available. Therefore, it is not mandatory
to resolve each and every clash.
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
10 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
5.2 Modelling & Review
5.2.1 Following shall be modelled and subsequently reviewed for 30% milestone:-
 All equipments
 Equipment arrangement and relative positions and elevations shall satisfy governing
process criteria
 Support arrangement, nozzles locations and platforms shall be reviewed
 Space allocation for data not available
(Equipments, vendor packages, etc)
 Envisaged space envelopes for:
 Electrical & instrument facilities such as E/I main cable trays, Remote I/O Panel and
Field Junction Boxes, Electrical rooms, Analyser house
 Envelopes for door opening, equipment removal, etc.
 Fire pump house
 HVAC equipment, ventilation, ducts, etc.
 Space management and space allocation for:
 Constructability  Operability  Maintenance  Logistics
 Pull out spaces  Removal spaces  Lay down area  Loading / unloading bays
 Cranes, Monorails, hoists, beams
 Escape routes  Access ways  Man ways
 Vehicles and forklifts movement
 Material handling requirements
 Fire Engine Access
 Set back envelop from plant boundaries as per local authority guidelines
 All lines as per prior agreement with Client (without supports)
 Space and feasibility for supporting shall be confirmed
 Process critical lines (as per specific process & instrumentation requirements)
 Removal space for valves, speciality items, inline & online instrumentation
 Utility stations and Safety Showers w/eye wash
 All underground facilities
(Piping, sewers, drains, trenches, electrical duct banks, etc.)
 Main floor slabs
 Main equipment platforms
 Main pipe racks, sub-racks, sleepers
 Roads, paving, bund areas
 Piling (up to 5 meters)
 Main structural framing and foundations, including stairways, ladders, walkways
 Drainage system showing drain width and invert levels (Preliminary)
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
11 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
 Architectural (shell basic, external modelling only)
 Buildings: Administration & Maintenance, Chemical Storage, Central Control Room,
Substations, Cleaning Area, Fire Pump House, Air Compressor Unit, etc.
 External roads, driveway, road marking, turfing area, gravel area, pedestrian walkway,
fencing & gate
 Exterior masonry & Interior partition walls, louvers panels, concrete stair, roof elements
5.3 Outcome & Objectives
5.3.1 Following should be frozen:-
 Coordinates for the plant, units, buildings, shelters, pipe racks, sleepers
 Equipments location and elevation
 All main platforms, stairways, ladders, walkways, escape routes
 Lay down and maintenance spaces
 Equipment layouts IFD
 No major changes are expected in the equipment layouts for the next stage
 All disciplines shall proceed with further detail design based on Equipment Layouts
5.3.2 Equipments once frozen during the formal model review shall be colour coded as per
agreed colour codes.
5.3.3 Preliminary study on nozzle orientation and support cleats (as input for equipment RFQ)
5.3.4 Preliminary stress analysis of agreed lines
(Confirm routing, location of equipments and load data to civil)
5.3.5 Preliminary bulk MTO for RFQ. The main aim is the MTO for special materials and in
general all long lead items
(Includes piping, structural steelwork, gratings, concrete, etc)
5.3.6 Preliminary design calculations for the main structures, foundations, pipe racks and
sleepers
5.3.7 Verification of civil and structural modelling with respect to preliminary design of beam
sizes and bracing locations
5.3.8 Verification of size and loading data of equipments (for civil / structural design)
5.3.9 Piling design and piling layouts
5.3.10 Architectural layouts
5.3.11 Fire protection and fire fighting system design, layouts
5.3.12 Main E/I cable routings
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
12 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
6.0 60% MODEL REVIEW
The main focus of the 60% model review is to establish the progress of the detail design
as per latest information
6.1 60% Review Stage Requirements
6.1.1 The outcome and conclusions of the 30% model review are the basis for further
proceeding with the detail engineering and also progress upon the 3D model.
6.1.2 All comments of 30% model review have to be resolved and closed out in order to
proceed with the next stage.
6.1.3 Further, the following are required to reach 60% milestone completion:-
 Latest revision of P&ID and Line List
 Equipment, package items vendor drawings
 Piping stress analysis
 Special pipe supports sizes calculations
 IFD Instrument hook-up details
 Instrument Data (especially for all Inline Instruments) from Client approved Vendor
Catalogues
 Speciality items vendor data
 E/I Main and branch cable tray sizes, tubing tray and conduit spaces
 Vendor data and location of RIO Cabinets, Field Junction Boxes, Field local panels,
light fittings, etc.
 Instrument air manifolds and heat tracing systems manifolds typical calculations and
sizing for distribution
 Civil and structural design and calculations done using vendor data
 Updates on buildings and structures (footprints, coordinates, elevations)
6.1.4 The model shall be clash checked and made clash free before the formal review
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
13 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
6.2 Modelling & Review
6.2.1 All aspects of modelling and reviewing at 30% milestone (as in section 5.2) are also
generally applicable to 60% milestone.
6.2.2 The 3D model at this milestone shall have progressed much further. Therefore, the
review shall be extensive. All additional modelling done after the 30% milestone shall be
reviewed.
6.2.3 Following shall be modelled and subsequently reviewed for 60% milestone:
 In general, all modelling done so far shall be rechecked and updated with respect to
latest available information
 Equipments (as per latest available vendor drawings)
 Most of the lines (80% to 90%)
 Piping supports including secondary supports
 It shall be ensured that under no circumstances is any piping support taken from
monorails and crane beams.
 Valves and speciality items accessibility check
 All Operational platforms and cat ladders
 Lay down area for equipments with removable internals
(Exchanger tubes, column trays and packing, etc)
 Movement of mobile / portable equipments
 Maintenance beams, monorails, hoists, davits
 Travel path of crane / hoist hooks taking into account the size of item being handled
 Civil and structural modelling shall have proceeded with more details
(Hand rails, bracings, fencing, etc)
 Secondary structures
 Drainage system showing drain width and invert levels
 Fire proofing, wherever applicable
 All Inline instruments
 Valves (Emergency Isolation, Control, On/Off, Butterfly, Safety), Rupture Disc, Mass
Flow Meter, Mag Flow Meter, Vortex Flow Meters, Orifice, Venturi, Thermowell, etc
 All Offline Instruments
 Electronic Transmitters, Level Instruments, etc
 Instrument location, accessibility review
 Instrument junction boxes
 Instrument air and heat tracing systems manifolds
 Lighting fixtures
 Field panels
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
14 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
 E/I branch cable trays
 Branch Trays of 150 mm and 100 mm shall be modelled. 75 mm and below sizes shall
be site routed and will not be modelled.
 Branch conduits (if any) shall not be modelled.
 Spaces (envelope) for conduits (≥ Ø50 mm) and tubing trays (≥100 mm width)
 Ductwork in process areas in more detail with the inline / online components
 Fire fighting system
(Sprinkler head locations, hydrants, monitors, foam tanks, deluge outlets locations, sprinkler
and deluge pipe routing, valve manifold locations)
 Architectural updates of buildings, walls, doors and windows (as applicable)
6.3 Outcome & Objectives
6.3.1 IFC Equipment Layouts
6.3.2 IFD Piping layouts
6.3.3 Piping MTO
6.3.4 Stress analysis of majority lines completed.
6.3.5 Main pipe supports completed
6.3.6 Special pipe supports completed
6.3.7 Detailing of Structural design Completion
6.3.8 IFC Civil and structural layouts
 Shall Include secondary beams, staircases, handrails, equipment support beams, main
structural framing sizes, roads & pavements layout, drainage system, location of main
pipe supports, crane beams, monorails, hoists, Floor openings, etc
6.3.9 The civil and structural design, including equipment foundations confirmed for all the
equipment loads and ready for permitting submission to authority
6.3.10 Structural steel MTO
6.3.11 Drainage Layout
6.3.12 Instrumentation location plans, lighting layouts, cable tray layouts & field panel locations
6.3.13 Fire protection Layouts
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
15 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
7.0 90% MODEL REVIEW
The main focus of the 90% model review is to close-out all the action points from
previous reviews, complete the modelling of all disciplines in all respects and
subsequently issue all final IFC drawings and documents
7.1 90% Review Stage Requirements
7.1.1 Following are required to reach 90% milestone completion:-
 All Input documents IFC Status
 P&ID, Line List, etc.
 Approved equipment and package vendor drawings
 Approved vendor drawings of all modelled items (all disciplines)
 Approved Instrument vendor drawings
 Approved Vendor drawings for speciality items, safety showers, etc.
 Structural steel design and modelling completed.
 IFC Civil and structural drawings
 Stress analysis completed.
 Main piping supports modelled as per designed information.
 Fire Protection, fire proofing ( as applicable), escape ways (including associated
stairs and ladders), hand rails, drains etc are designed/ approved in-line with
Authorities requirements
7.1.2 The model shall be clash checked and made clash free before the formal review
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
16 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
7.2 Modelling & Review
7.2.1 Following shall be modelled and subsequently reviewed for 90% milestone:
 In general, all modelling done so far shall be rechecked and updated with respect to
latest available information
 Final review of Operability, maintainability and constructability
 Escape ways, stairs, ladders, operation platforms reviewed as final
 All discipline items modelled as per dimensions given in approved vendor drawings
 All piping including small bore
 (Except tubing. Envelopes provided for tubing and trays including insulation / lagging)
 All piping supports
 (Including Springs, snubbers, rod hangers)
 Safety shower and eye wash as per vendor drawing.
 All drawings and documents shall be ready for IFC issue.
 Floor and wall openings
 All supports
 (trays, ducts, fire protection pipe work and all secondary pipe supports)
 All equipment handling equipments such as hoists, monorails, EOT cranes, beams,
etc are reviewed using final vendor drawings and weights for maintenance
requirements
 Building internal facility modelling, if required
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
17 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
7.3 Outcome & Objectives
7.3.1 This is the final formal review of the 3D model. Any subsequent reviews will be specific
and pertaining only to the closeout of the comments.
7.3.2 IFC Isometrics
 Refer to Isometrics Flowchart WI-LL-24f3 in Section 9.0 of this Work Instruction.
7.3.3 All pipe support drawings
7.3.4 IFC Piping layouts
7.3.5 Final issue of equipment layouts, plant layouts, overall plot plan
7.3.6 Final MTO
7.3.7 IFC Main pipe support drawings
7.3.8 Structural steel layouts, elevations of all pipe racks, process structures, equipment
support structures, platforms, ladders, stairs, gratings, floor plates, etc. issued
7.3.9 All other miscellaneous civil fabrication drawings and details done.
7.3.10 Floor opening and wall penetration drawings and details shall be completed.
7.3.11 Tray layouts IFC
7.3.12 Lighting layouts IFC
7.3.13 Instrument location plans IFC
7.3.14 Duct layouts IFC
7.3.15 Fire protection system – layouts, sprinkler heads, deluge outlets & their piping layouts
IFC
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
18 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
8.0 MILESTONES SCOPE MATRIX
8.1 Piping and Mechanical:
Modelling Scope
1st
Client
Review
2
nd
Client
Review
Final
Review
Remarks / Comments
30% 60% 90%
Piping Modelling
 Number of lines and pipe sizes as
agreed with Client for each milestone
X X X Only Preliminary Routing @ 30%
All Underground Piping X X
Equipments X X X
Safety Showers X X
Utility Stations X X
Sample points X
In-Line Piping Components X X
In-Line Instrumentation & Speciality X X
Critical Lines Identified For Stress
Analysis
X
Critical Lines Compliance to Stress
Requirements
X
Pipe Racks & Sub-Racks X X Location Only
Primary Pipe Supports X Detailed By Stress Engineer
Secondary Pipe Supports X X
Note: Ensure that under no circumstances is any piping support taken from monorails and crane beams
Equipment Supports X X Location Only
Withdrawal Spaces X
Maintenance Space X X
Escape routes X X
Pull out space and lay down area X X
Davits and Equipment Manholes X X
Lifting Lugs X X
Vendor Packages, Modules, & Skid Units X X
Future Equipment X
Inline and Offline Instruments X X
Insulation for Pipes X X X
Floor Drainage and associated pipe work
above ground
X X
Runway & Lifting Modelling Volume X X
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
19 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
8.2 Building Services:
Modelling Scope
1st
Client
Review
2
nd
Client
Review
Final
Review
Remarks / Comments
30% 60% 90%
BS Piping X X
BS Equipment X X X
Fire protection and fire fighting system X X X
In-Line Piping Components X
In-Line Instrumentation & Speciality X
Plumbing Services – only for underground X X
Fire Protection Piping (underground) X
Fire Protection Piping (aboveground) X
Critical Lines Identified For Stress
Analysis
X
Critical Lines Compliance to Stress
Requirements
X
Primary BS Pipe Supports X
Secondary BS Pipe Supports X X
BS Equipment Supports X X
Extract Fans & Fan Filter Heaters X
Ventilation Ductwork & Insulation X
Ductwork In-line Components X
Ductwork In-line Instrumentation X
Dedicated Extract Systems X
Main Ductwork Support Steels X
Major Ducting X
Dampers X
Fans, withdrawal space X X
Low Wall exhaust Grilles X X X
Sprinkler Headers, Deluge lines X
Sprinkler Lines X
Piping X
 Modelled by Piping based on inputs provided by Building Services
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
20 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
8.3 Civil and Structural:
Modelling Scope
1st
Client
Review
2
nd
Client
Review
Final
Review
Remarks / Comments
30% 60% 90%
Primary Steelwork X X X
Connection details X X
Critical Insert-plate details X X
Modular Pipe Racks X X X
Typical Details X X X
Hand railing X X
Cat Ladders X X
Checker Plate & Grating X X
Steel Staircases X X
Stair Towers X X
Purlins & Side Rails X X
Vessel Supports X X
Critical Pipe Supports X X
Concrete Floor Slabs X X
Concrete Floor Penetrations X
Floor Sumps X X
Mezzanine Concrete Floors X X
Concrete Walls X X
Concrete Wall Penetrations X
Retaining Walls X X
Bund Area’s X X X
Foundations X X X
Concrete Up-stands & Plinths X
Pits & Trenches X X
Underground Drainage X X X
Columns & Beams X X X
Trimmers X
Runway and lifting beams / lifting eye X X
Pipe Rack & Structural Pipe Supports X X X
Preliminary walk-on ceiling (extent) X X
Secondary Supports X X
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
21 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
Modelling Scope
1st
Client
Review
2
nd
Client
Review
Final
Review
Remarks / Comments
30% 60% 90%
Concrete Floors X X X
Lift Pits X
Pre-Cast Core Walls X
Equipment Base Grout X X
Anchor Bolt Setting X X
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
22 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
8.4 Architectural:
Note: Architectural details will be modelled only when the building internal areas are to be
modelled. They will not be modelled, if only building shell has to be modelled as envelope
Modelling Scope
1st
Client
Review
2
nd
Client
Review
Final
Review
Remarks / Comments
30% 60% 90%
Exterior Masonry Walls X
Exterior Masonry Wall Opes X
Interior Partition Walls X X
Interior Partition Walls Opes X X
Exterior Cladding X
Louver Panels X X
Suspended Ceilings X
Doors X
Windows & Screens X
Concrete Stairs X X
Elevator Shaft X
Roof Elements X X
External Rain water Pipes X
Sanitary Fittings X
Laboratory Furniture & Fittings X
Office Furniture & Fittings X
Internal Walls X
External Walls X
Finish Floor Penetrations X X
Windows, Vision Panels X
Clean room False Ceiling X
Doors, Vision Panels X
Laboratory Benches X
Lockers Area Furniture X
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
23 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
8.5 Electrical:
Modelling Scope
1st
Client
Review
2
nd
Client
Review
Final
Review
Remarks / Comments
30% 60% 90%
Main Cable Trays Routes (for power,
control & auxiliary systems)
X X
Branch Cable Tray Routes X X
Electrical MCC room Equipment (Dry type
transformer, Switchgear, MCC etc.)
X
Electrical Misc. Panels (various panels
outside electrical rooms
X X
Electrical junction box, local switches /
push button stations.
X X
Light Fittings X X
Underground trenches, duct banks X X
Supports For Main Cable Trays X By Civil and Structural
Support For Branch/Cable Trays X X By Civil and Structural
Supports for Junction Boxes, local
switches, push buttons, electrical panels
outside electrical rooms
X X By Civil and Structural (for
electrical panels only)
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
24 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
8.6 Instrumentation:
Modelling Scope
1st
Client
Review
2
nd
Client
Review
Final
Review
Remarks / Comments
30% 60% 90%
Instrumentation Junction Boxes X X X
Remote I/O Panels X X X
Main Instrumentation Cable Tray Layout X X X
PAT Cabinet Location X X
PAT Container Location X X X
Local Control Panel/PLC Panel Location X X X
Instrument Air manifold Location X X
Offline instruments X X Offline instruments on pipe lines
are modelled by piping
Branch cable trays (≥100mm width) X X
Instruments Drain connection to common
Drain Funnel as shown in the P&ID &
Instrument Hook-ups
X X (By piping, if line number is given
to the drain line)
SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008
Department Work Instruction
Document No:
SING-WI-LL-24
Page :
25 of 25
3D Model Review Procedure
Supersedes:
Nil
Revision: 0
Issue Date:
04 January 2010
Issuing Department:
Quality – Singapore
Functional Department:
Piping Department
Previous Rev & Issue Date:
Nil
Effective Date:
04 January 2010
The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page.
This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.
9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTATION (REFERENCES)
WI-LL-24f1 : Model Review and Comments Recording Spreadsheet
WI-LL-24f1.XLS
WI-LL-24f2 : 3D Workflow Diagram
WI-LL-24f2.dwg
WI-LL-24f3 : Isometric Flowchart
WI-LL-24f3.xls
WI-LL-24f4 : Weekly Action Log
WI-LL-24f4.xls
Double Click on Icons to display the document
10.0 RECORDS
The weekly / daily review action logs, the line wise review & comments recorded on the
Line List and the Model Review and Comments Recording Spreadsheets shall be
preserved as part of the project documentation.

More Related Content

What's hot

Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...HIMADRI BANERJI
 
Managing outsource IT contracts - Transition management
Managing outsource IT contracts - Transition managementManaging outsource IT contracts - Transition management
Managing outsource IT contracts - Transition managementRonald Bartels
 
Epc project interdepency and Work Flow- promo
Epc project interdepency and Work Flow- promoEpc project interdepency and Work Flow- promo
Epc project interdepency and Work Flow- promoignitetribes
 
Project Brief Summary PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Brief Summary PowerPoint Presentation Slides Project Brief Summary PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Brief Summary PowerPoint Presentation Slides SlideTeam
 
30 60 90 percent ifc engineering what is the project progress - Oracle Prim...
30 60 90 percent ifc engineering   what is the project progress - Oracle Prim...30 60 90 percent ifc engineering   what is the project progress - Oracle Prim...
30 60 90 percent ifc engineering what is the project progress - Oracle Prim...p6academy
 
PMBOK GUIDE 7th Summary
PMBOK GUIDE 7th Summary PMBOK GUIDE 7th Summary
PMBOK GUIDE 7th Summary Amr Miqdadi
 
Epc issues and recommendations
Epc issues and recommendationsEpc issues and recommendations
Epc issues and recommendationsubk1411
 
Chapter 3 The Project Management Process Groups A Case Study.ppt
Chapter 3 The Project Management Process Groups A Case Study.pptChapter 3 The Project Management Process Groups A Case Study.ppt
Chapter 3 The Project Management Process Groups A Case Study.pptAhmadTawfigAlRadaide
 
Construction Monthly Progress Report - June 2011
Construction Monthly Progress Report - June 2011Construction Monthly Progress Report - June 2011
Construction Monthly Progress Report - June 2011Jamal Nelson, CCM
 
Governance Deck PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Governance Deck PowerPoint Presentation SlidesGovernance Deck PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Governance Deck PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
 
Enterprise Project Management
Enterprise Project ManagementEnterprise Project Management
Enterprise Project ManagementMartin Mehalchin
 
Effective Engineering Management in EPC Industry
Effective Engineering Management in EPC IndustryEffective Engineering Management in EPC Industry
Effective Engineering Management in EPC IndustryPMI Chennai Chapter
 
WORKFLOW
WORKFLOW WORKFLOW
WORKFLOW TW Carl
 
Project Management Kickoff Meeting Template Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Management Kickoff Meeting Template Powerpoint Presentation SlidesProject Management Kickoff Meeting Template Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Management Kickoff Meeting Template Powerpoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
 
Project Management Concepts (from PMBOK 5th Ed)
Project Management Concepts (from PMBOK 5th Ed)Project Management Concepts (from PMBOK 5th Ed)
Project Management Concepts (from PMBOK 5th Ed)Jeremy Jay Lim
 

What's hot (20)

Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...
 
Managing outsource IT contracts - Transition management
Managing outsource IT contracts - Transition managementManaging outsource IT contracts - Transition management
Managing outsource IT contracts - Transition management
 
Epc project interdepency and Work Flow- promo
Epc project interdepency and Work Flow- promoEpc project interdepency and Work Flow- promo
Epc project interdepency and Work Flow- promo
 
Project Brief Summary PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Brief Summary PowerPoint Presentation Slides Project Brief Summary PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Brief Summary PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
30 60 90 percent ifc engineering what is the project progress - Oracle Prim...
30 60 90 percent ifc engineering   what is the project progress - Oracle Prim...30 60 90 percent ifc engineering   what is the project progress - Oracle Prim...
30 60 90 percent ifc engineering what is the project progress - Oracle Prim...
 
PMP Course syllabus.pdf
PMP Course syllabus.pdfPMP Course syllabus.pdf
PMP Course syllabus.pdf
 
Requirements Validation
Requirements ValidationRequirements Validation
Requirements Validation
 
Project Time Management
Project Time ManagementProject Time Management
Project Time Management
 
PMBOK GUIDE 7th Summary
PMBOK GUIDE 7th Summary PMBOK GUIDE 7th Summary
PMBOK GUIDE 7th Summary
 
Epc issues and recommendations
Epc issues and recommendationsEpc issues and recommendations
Epc issues and recommendations
 
Chapter 3 The Project Management Process Groups A Case Study.ppt
Chapter 3 The Project Management Process Groups A Case Study.pptChapter 3 The Project Management Process Groups A Case Study.ppt
Chapter 3 The Project Management Process Groups A Case Study.ppt
 
Construction Monthly Progress Report - June 2011
Construction Monthly Progress Report - June 2011Construction Monthly Progress Report - June 2011
Construction Monthly Progress Report - June 2011
 
Governance Deck PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Governance Deck PowerPoint Presentation SlidesGovernance Deck PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Governance Deck PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
Problem Management
Problem ManagementProblem Management
Problem Management
 
Enterprise Project Management
Enterprise Project ManagementEnterprise Project Management
Enterprise Project Management
 
Effective Engineering Management in EPC Industry
Effective Engineering Management in EPC IndustryEffective Engineering Management in EPC Industry
Effective Engineering Management in EPC Industry
 
Advanced Work Packaging: Applying Project Controls
Advanced Work Packaging: Applying Project ControlsAdvanced Work Packaging: Applying Project Controls
Advanced Work Packaging: Applying Project Controls
 
WORKFLOW
WORKFLOW WORKFLOW
WORKFLOW
 
Project Management Kickoff Meeting Template Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Management Kickoff Meeting Template Powerpoint Presentation SlidesProject Management Kickoff Meeting Template Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Management Kickoff Meeting Template Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 
Project Management Concepts (from PMBOK 5th Ed)
Project Management Concepts (from PMBOK 5th Ed)Project Management Concepts (from PMBOK 5th Ed)
Project Management Concepts (from PMBOK 5th Ed)
 

Similar to SING-WI-LL-24 REV 0

unit2.pdfJgkcGkgcjkGKCJGgscdGSADKJgjsdkgKJAGSDJK
unit2.pdfJgkcGkgcjkGKCJGgscdGSADKJgjsdkgKJAGSDJKunit2.pdfJgkcGkgcjkGKCJGgscdGSADKJgjsdkgKJAGSDJK
unit2.pdfJgkcGkgcjkGKCJGgscdGSADKJgjsdkgKJAGSDJKAvijitChaudhuri3
 
IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...
IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...
IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...IRJET Journal
 
Testing material (1).docx
Testing material (1).docxTesting material (1).docx
Testing material (1).docxKVamshiKrishna5
 
Softwareenggineering lab manual
Softwareenggineering lab manualSoftwareenggineering lab manual
Softwareenggineering lab manualVivek Kumar Sinha
 
21UCAE65 Software Testing.pdf(MTNC)(BCA)
21UCAE65 Software Testing.pdf(MTNC)(BCA)21UCAE65 Software Testing.pdf(MTNC)(BCA)
21UCAE65 Software Testing.pdf(MTNC)(BCA)ssuser7f90ae
 
Project management-plan
Project management-planProject management-plan
Project management-planTran Tien
 
SDLC - Software Development Life Cycle
SDLC - Software Development Life CycleSDLC - Software Development Life Cycle
SDLC - Software Development Life CycleSaravanan Manoharan
 
Module-3_Design thinking in IT Industries.pdf
Module-3_Design thinking in IT Industries.pdfModule-3_Design thinking in IT Industries.pdf
Module-3_Design thinking in IT Industries.pdfvijimech408
 
Software engineering jwfiles 3
Software engineering jwfiles 3Software engineering jwfiles 3
Software engineering jwfiles 3Azhar Shaik
 
A Comparative Study of Different types of Models in Software Development Life...
A Comparative Study of Different types of Models in Software Development Life...A Comparative Study of Different types of Models in Software Development Life...
A Comparative Study of Different types of Models in Software Development Life...IRJET Journal
 
Software Design Architecture SDA SDLC DETAILS
Software Design Architecture  SDA SDLC DETAILSSoftware Design Architecture  SDA SDLC DETAILS
Software Design Architecture SDA SDLC DETAILSMalikNaeemullah
 
Software Engineering Model Question Paper 5th sem (1) (1).pdf
Software Engineering Model Question Paper 5th sem (1) (1).pdfSoftware Engineering Model Question Paper 5th sem (1) (1).pdf
Software Engineering Model Question Paper 5th sem (1) (1).pdfsweta836730
 
Unit 2 final
Unit 2 finalUnit 2 final
Unit 2 finalsietkcse
 
SDLC Models and Their Implementation
SDLC Models and Their ImplementationSDLC Models and Their Implementation
SDLC Models and Their ImplementationSonal Tiwari
 

Similar to SING-WI-LL-24 REV 0 (20)

unit2.pdfJgkcGkgcjkGKCJGgscdGSADKJgjsdkgKJAGSDJK
unit2.pdfJgkcGkgcjkGKCJGgscdGSADKJgjsdkgKJAGSDJKunit2.pdfJgkcGkgcjkGKCJGgscdGSADKJgjsdkgKJAGSDJK
unit2.pdfJgkcGkgcjkGKCJGgscdGSADKJgjsdkgKJAGSDJK
 
IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...
IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...
IRJET- Comparative Analysis between Sequential and Iterative Project Manageme...
 
Testing material (1).docx
Testing material (1).docxTesting material (1).docx
Testing material (1).docx
 
Softwareenggineering lab manual
Softwareenggineering lab manualSoftwareenggineering lab manual
Softwareenggineering lab manual
 
21UCAE65 Software Testing.pdf(MTNC)(BCA)
21UCAE65 Software Testing.pdf(MTNC)(BCA)21UCAE65 Software Testing.pdf(MTNC)(BCA)
21UCAE65 Software Testing.pdf(MTNC)(BCA)
 
Project management-plan
Project management-planProject management-plan
Project management-plan
 
SDLC - Software Development Life Cycle
SDLC - Software Development Life CycleSDLC - Software Development Life Cycle
SDLC - Software Development Life Cycle
 
Ijetcas14 545
Ijetcas14 545Ijetcas14 545
Ijetcas14 545
 
Module-3_Design thinking in IT Industries.pdf
Module-3_Design thinking in IT Industries.pdfModule-3_Design thinking in IT Industries.pdf
Module-3_Design thinking in IT Industries.pdf
 
Software engineering jwfiles 3
Software engineering jwfiles 3Software engineering jwfiles 3
Software engineering jwfiles 3
 
A Comparative Study of Different types of Models in Software Development Life...
A Comparative Study of Different types of Models in Software Development Life...A Comparative Study of Different types of Models in Software Development Life...
A Comparative Study of Different types of Models in Software Development Life...
 
Software Design Architecture SDA SDLC DETAILS
Software Design Architecture  SDA SDLC DETAILSSoftware Design Architecture  SDA SDLC DETAILS
Software Design Architecture SDA SDLC DETAILS
 
Software Engineering Model Question Paper 5th sem (1) (1).pdf
Software Engineering Model Question Paper 5th sem (1) (1).pdfSoftware Engineering Model Question Paper 5th sem (1) (1).pdf
Software Engineering Model Question Paper 5th sem (1) (1).pdf
 
UNIT-II MMB.pptx
UNIT-II MMB.pptxUNIT-II MMB.pptx
UNIT-II MMB.pptx
 
Chapter 2
Chapter 2 Chapter 2
Chapter 2
 
SDLC Models.pdf
SDLC Models.pdfSDLC Models.pdf
SDLC Models.pdf
 
Unit 2 final
Unit 2 finalUnit 2 final
Unit 2 final
 
SDLC Models and Their Implementation
SDLC Models and Their ImplementationSDLC Models and Their Implementation
SDLC Models and Their Implementation
 
Spm unit 3
Spm unit 3Spm unit 3
Spm unit 3
 
PROCESS MODELS.ppt
PROCESS MODELS.pptPROCESS MODELS.ppt
PROCESS MODELS.ppt
 

SING-WI-LL-24 REV 0

  • 1.
  • 2. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 2 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 1.0 PURPOSE .............................................................................................................4 2.0 SCOPE ..................................................................................................................4 3.0 OVERVIEW ...........................................................................................................5 3.1 General.............................................................................................................................5 3.2 Weekly / Daily Reviews ....................................................................................................5 3.3 Modelling Scope...............................................................................................................6 3.4 3D Model Output ..............................................................................................................7 3.5 Review & Comments Recording ......................................................................................8 4.0 DESIGN MILESTONES ........................................................................................8 5.0 30% MODEL REVIEW..........................................................................................9 5.1 30% Review Stage Requirements....................................................................................9 5.2 Modelling & Review........................................................................................................10 5.3 Outcome & Objectives....................................................................................................11 6.0 60% MODEL REVIEW........................................................................................12 6.1 60% Review Stage Requirements..................................................................................12 6.2 Modelling & Review........................................................................................................13 6.3 Outcome & Objectives....................................................................................................14 7.0 90% MODEL REVIEW........................................................................................15 7.1 90% Review Stage Requirements..................................................................................15 7.2 Modelling & Review........................................................................................................16 7.3 Outcome & Objectives....................................................................................................17 8.0 MILESTONES SCOPE MATRIX.........................................................................18 8.1 Piping and Mechanical: ..................................................................................................18 8.2 Building Services:...........................................................................................................19 8.3 Civil and Structural: ........................................................................................................20 8.4 Architectural: ..................................................................................................................22 8.5 Electrical:........................................................................................................................23 8.6 Instrumentation:..............................................................................................................24 9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTATION (REFERENCES)..............................................25 10.0 RECORDS...........................................................................................................25
  • 3. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 3 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. PAGE COUNT Document No. No. of Pages Main Document SING-WI-LL-24 25 Related Documents WI-LL-24f1 1 WI-LL-24f2 1 WI-LL-24f3 1 WI-LL-24f4 1 Sub-Total 4 TOTAL PAGES 25 + 4 = 29
  • 4. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 4 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this Work Instruction is to establish the procedures for the review of the 3D model. 2.0 SCOPE This Work Instruction describes procedures and guidelines for review of the 3D model and is applicable to all projects where PDS 3D software is being utilized for design. Note: Although, this procedure is primarily applicable to PDS, similar guidelines can be extended to other modelling software such as AUTOPLANT and PDMS with appropriate considerations to issues that are software specific.  Refer to WI-LL-24f2 for the 3D Workflow Diagram Inputs required for 3D model development, design progress to be made and output expectations from the model at various stages of completion are identified.  The stages of the 3D model reviews are milestones and expressed in terms of percentage, not necessarily equal to percentage of engineering progress made.  The objectives of the 3D model review are to ensure:-  Design has progressed to the expected stage as planned  Model incorporates progress made in design and vendor data available to date  Design meets all process functionality, engineering and HSE requirements  Constructability, Operability and Maintainability requirements are incorporated  Standardized design philosophies are utilized across the project  Client’s Standards, as applicable, are adhered  Modelled work is clash free and inter-discipline interfaces are incorporated  Design deficiencies are clearly identified  Time based path forward for resolving open items  This document lists the roles and responsibilities of all engineering disciplines and their contributions towards successful completion of the 3D model. All disciplines (Piping, Process, Mechanical, Civil, Architectural, Electrical, Instrumentation and Building Services and DTS) shall be actively involved during the reviews.  Inputs required to reach each milestone completion are identified.  Modelling and review expectations of the 3D model and the outcomes and objectives of each milestone completion are listed.  These formal reviews shall be treated as important milestones for Project schedule. All stake holders i.e. Technology (Licensor), Engineering, Projects, Construction, Operations and Maintenance departments shall participate in these sessions.  These formal reviews do not substitute regular weekly review sessions and these are not line by line reviews.  The review methodology, review agenda and participants for each formal review shall be discussed and agreed with the Client before the review.
  • 5. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 5 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 3.0 OVERVIEW 3.1 General 3.1.1 It is essential to conduct formal Client reviews of the 3D model at appropriate pre-fixed time intervals throughout the duration of the project and get Client’s approval for the design that is completed. 3.1.2 Depending upon the size of the project and the number of units involved, the project may be divided into sub-areas so that the 3D model reviews can be conducted independently. The Client’s Project Managers and Jacob’s Project Engineering Managers shall be the focal point of contact for all reviews, comments and close outs. 3.1.3 NAVISWORKS software shall be used for the formal model reviews. 3.1.4 The formal model reviews shall be conducted over a period of three to five working days, depending on each area. 3.2 Weekly / Daily Reviews 3.2.1 Apart from formal model reviews, weekly model reviews shall continue throughout the project duration to address ongoing action points and monitor progress and quality of the 3D model. 3.2.2 An action log (WI-LL-24f4) shall be maintained by the Project Engineering Manager to record and track the weekly model review comments for all the disciplines. Actions that are completed shall be suitably tagged. The completed and/or tagged action points shall be reviewed in the successive sessions and closed out. 3.2.3 Separate line wise reviews shall also be conducted to ensure that the line modelling is consistent with inputs (mainly process) and checked for stress, accessibility of valves and instruments, supporting is taken care of, slopes, no-pocket and specific requirements are adhered to and all holds & assumptions are documented. 3.2.4 During these reviews, checks shall be done to ensure that the model is updated in line with latest vendor documents and with agreed comments of previous review sessions. 3.2.5 Line wise checking requires more time. It may not be feasible to check and obtain approval for lines modelled during the entire week, during the weekly review sessions. Therefore, at some point of time during the execution of the project, daily reviews will be required. Based on the checking backlog of modelled lines, the PEM / Lead Engineer shall discuss and agree upon the requirement for daily reviews with the Client’s PM. The focus of the daily reviews must be to check / approve all the lines modelled during the previous days and clear the backlogs.
  • 6. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 6 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 3.2.6 Lines that are checked and approved shall be ‘locked’ in the 3D model to prevent unauthorized modifications and to control further changes. This could only be done at a certain stage of the model. That is, certain lines could be locked after 60% model review and later during reviews that are called specifically to approve lines and lock them either by area or system wise. 3.2.7 A working copy of the line list shall be maintained and duly updated to record and track line wise review comments and balance points (including holds and assumptions). 3.2.8 NAVISWORKS software shall be used for the weekly and daily model reviews 3.3 Modelling Scope 3.3.1 Entire plant shall be modelled. The exceptions are listed as below. Intention is to get quality output documents that have undergone multi-disciplinary checks and reviewed by technology, construction and operations and maintenance departments. 3.3.2 All above ground work and underground services shall be modelled. Piling shall be modelled to a depth of 5 meters to ensure that all underground services are clash free 3.3.3 Non-process buildings may not be modelled. However, these buildings outlines shall be modelled as shell/envelope with coordinates. Process buildings interiors such as electrical/ instrumentation rooms, office rooms and similar enclosed rooms will not be modelled. Only their encompassing walls shall be modelled. 3.3.4 Building services, electrical and instrumentation equipment installed outside shall be modelled as envelopes only, for space & interface management. 3.3.5 Extent of items to be modelled has to be agreed with the client during scope definition. The following should be treated as a guideline only.  All sizes of piping (with insulation, as applicable) (Tubing will not be modeled. Only manifolds will be modeled)  All equipment (including portable equipment, as applicable) (The extent of modeling of vendor package units must be discussed and agreed)  All inline items  All supports  All piles, trenches, substructure and superstructure (Concrete rebars, anchor bolts, etc details are not to be modeled. They are only modeled to shape)  All steel structural work, including platforms, stairs, walkways, ladders, chequered plates, gratings, handrails, openings  Floor slopes, Roads, paving, drains, space for trees and plants  Buildings (refer to clause 3.3.3). External walls – brick walls, cladding, windows, louvers, doors, openings for cables, piping, ducts and other services
  • 7. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 7 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.  Main and branch cable trays (≥100 mm width), spaces for conduits (≥ Ø50 mm), raceways and tubing/ tubing trays (≥100 mm width)  Offline instruments (modeled by piping as per input given by Instrumentation)  Instrument stands, manifolds, Field local panels, junction boxes, remote I/O panels  Electrical light fittings with supports, street lights with poles, stanchion mounted lights with stanchions (Supports could be modeled as spaces. Intention is not to produce support drawings from the model, but to provide spaces clash-free)  Field electrical panels, JB, socket outlets, control stations and similar with supports  Fire protection system equipment such as pumps, FW tanks, hydrants, hose boxes, monitors, foam tanks, operating platforms, valve manifolds, deluge outlets, sprinklers, all Fire protection systems piping  Process and non-process duct work in all areas (except those inside non-process buildings and areas excluded for modeling. See clause 3.3.3 above)  Envelopes for safety and escape routes, maintenance spaces  Spaces for ambulance parking, ambulance and Fire engine movements, loading/ unloading trucks, vans and similar ones parked inside the plant  Spaces and travel path for mobile and portable equipments  Spaces and travel path for crane / hoist hooks, taking into account the size of the item or equipment that is to be carried / handled  Spaces for temporary storage of materials during shutdown and normal operation and maintenance of plant and lay down yards  Interface with external / Third party suppliers and service providers 3.3.6 It is the responsibility of the DTS group to set up the PDS model volumes and also define the naming procedures at the very onset. The DTS group will prepare and issue for every project, a document which clearly describes the model volume nomenclature. 3.4 3D Model Output 3.4.1 The Intention of the formal reviews and the weekly / daily reviews is to get quality output documents that have undergone multi-disciplinary checks and reviewed by technology, construction and operations and maintenance departments. 3.4.2 All 2D layout type drawings developed for the project shall have their coordinates (X- refs) extracted from 3D only. None of the 2D layout type drawings shall be developed independently. This is mandatory requirement for ensuring consistency between the drawings issued for the project. (Appropriate considerations to issues that are software specific must be applied).
  • 8. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 8 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 3.4.3 Documents that are extracted from 3D model are listed below. However, this is only a guideline and depends upon project and modelling scope.  Plot plans  Equipment layouts  Piping layouts  Isometrics  Nozzle Orientation drawings  Support detail drawings  MTO  Structural steel drawings  Platform drawings  Cable tray layouts (will include field panels, JB, etc)  Lighting layouts (will include field panels)  Instrument location plans (will include field panels, RIO cabinets, JB, etc)  Ducting layouts  Sprinkler & deluge location plans  Fire hydrant/monitor location plans  X-refs/ Base lines for all 2D layout drawings 3.5 Review & Comments Recording 3.5.1 The comments that are generated during the formal model reviews shall be properly documented in a defined manner. 3.5.2 The spreadsheet WI-LL-24f1 shall be used for recording all the review comments. Refer to Section 9.0 of this Work Instruction. 3.5.3 After each review, all comments shall be compiled together by the Project Engineering Manager into a model review action report and circulated to all disciplines and to Client. This will be the checklist (or punch list) for incorporation into 3D model and closing out all the action points. 3.5.4 Once the action points in the spreadsheet are closed, then no further change in the design is expected. 3.5.5 The comments and actions of the weekly reviews shall be maintained as a Weekly Action Log (WI-LL-24f4) by the Project Engineering Manager. Refer to Section 9.0 of this Work Instruction. 4.0 DESIGN MILESTONES  The 3D model shall be formally reviewed with the Client at three milestone stages of completion. The stages are 30%, 60% and finally 90%.  Incorporation of the formal model review comments and close out shall be the foremost action point for the subsequent stage.  Completion of formal model review and incorporation of all comments and close out shall be the indicator of the design completed at that stage.  Once the model is reviewed and client approval is obtained on the closure of comments, then design for that stage shall be treated as Frozen. Subsequent changes to previously reviewed and approved designs shall be strictly restricted and controlled. Necessary change management system shall be enforced.
  • 9. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 9 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 5.0 30% MODEL REVIEW The main focus of the 30% model review is on layout, accessibility, space allocation, safety, ergonomics, operability, maintainability, constructability. 5.1 30% Review Stage Requirements 5.1.1 Following are required to reach 30% milestone completion:-  Basic Engineering stage modelling basis  Client’s Specific Design requirements (as applicable)  Project Design Basis  Initial concepts and studies  Building design concepts (footprints, elevations)  Tie-in locations (to external facilities)  IFD P&ID  IFD Line List & Tie-In list  IFD PDS and/or MDS  IFD Project Specifications  IFD Piping Material Specifications  IFD Plot Plan and Equipment Layouts  Piping Support Standards  Insulation Specification (Insulation thicknesses for piping and equipment)  Preliminary or reference data for piping speciality items  Preliminary or reference data for rotating equipments  Preliminary or reference data for Vendor Package items  Preliminary data for HVAC systems (fans, blowers, etc.)  Main E/I cable trays sizing  Ductwork philosophy  Space management philosophy  Fire protection and fire fighting systems philosophy  Underground philosophy (Piping, cable routing, duct banks, drainage, road crossing, piling, trenching, depths) 5.1.2 The model shall be clash checked and major clashes shall be resolved prior to formal review. At 30% review stage, lot of data is not available. Therefore, it is not mandatory to resolve each and every clash.
  • 10. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 10 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 5.2 Modelling & Review 5.2.1 Following shall be modelled and subsequently reviewed for 30% milestone:-  All equipments  Equipment arrangement and relative positions and elevations shall satisfy governing process criteria  Support arrangement, nozzles locations and platforms shall be reviewed  Space allocation for data not available (Equipments, vendor packages, etc)  Envisaged space envelopes for:  Electrical & instrument facilities such as E/I main cable trays, Remote I/O Panel and Field Junction Boxes, Electrical rooms, Analyser house  Envelopes for door opening, equipment removal, etc.  Fire pump house  HVAC equipment, ventilation, ducts, etc.  Space management and space allocation for:  Constructability  Operability  Maintenance  Logistics  Pull out spaces  Removal spaces  Lay down area  Loading / unloading bays  Cranes, Monorails, hoists, beams  Escape routes  Access ways  Man ways  Vehicles and forklifts movement  Material handling requirements  Fire Engine Access  Set back envelop from plant boundaries as per local authority guidelines  All lines as per prior agreement with Client (without supports)  Space and feasibility for supporting shall be confirmed  Process critical lines (as per specific process & instrumentation requirements)  Removal space for valves, speciality items, inline & online instrumentation  Utility stations and Safety Showers w/eye wash  All underground facilities (Piping, sewers, drains, trenches, electrical duct banks, etc.)  Main floor slabs  Main equipment platforms  Main pipe racks, sub-racks, sleepers  Roads, paving, bund areas  Piling (up to 5 meters)  Main structural framing and foundations, including stairways, ladders, walkways  Drainage system showing drain width and invert levels (Preliminary)
  • 11. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 11 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.  Architectural (shell basic, external modelling only)  Buildings: Administration & Maintenance, Chemical Storage, Central Control Room, Substations, Cleaning Area, Fire Pump House, Air Compressor Unit, etc.  External roads, driveway, road marking, turfing area, gravel area, pedestrian walkway, fencing & gate  Exterior masonry & Interior partition walls, louvers panels, concrete stair, roof elements 5.3 Outcome & Objectives 5.3.1 Following should be frozen:-  Coordinates for the plant, units, buildings, shelters, pipe racks, sleepers  Equipments location and elevation  All main platforms, stairways, ladders, walkways, escape routes  Lay down and maintenance spaces  Equipment layouts IFD  No major changes are expected in the equipment layouts for the next stage  All disciplines shall proceed with further detail design based on Equipment Layouts 5.3.2 Equipments once frozen during the formal model review shall be colour coded as per agreed colour codes. 5.3.3 Preliminary study on nozzle orientation and support cleats (as input for equipment RFQ) 5.3.4 Preliminary stress analysis of agreed lines (Confirm routing, location of equipments and load data to civil) 5.3.5 Preliminary bulk MTO for RFQ. The main aim is the MTO for special materials and in general all long lead items (Includes piping, structural steelwork, gratings, concrete, etc) 5.3.6 Preliminary design calculations for the main structures, foundations, pipe racks and sleepers 5.3.7 Verification of civil and structural modelling with respect to preliminary design of beam sizes and bracing locations 5.3.8 Verification of size and loading data of equipments (for civil / structural design) 5.3.9 Piling design and piling layouts 5.3.10 Architectural layouts 5.3.11 Fire protection and fire fighting system design, layouts 5.3.12 Main E/I cable routings
  • 12. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 12 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 6.0 60% MODEL REVIEW The main focus of the 60% model review is to establish the progress of the detail design as per latest information 6.1 60% Review Stage Requirements 6.1.1 The outcome and conclusions of the 30% model review are the basis for further proceeding with the detail engineering and also progress upon the 3D model. 6.1.2 All comments of 30% model review have to be resolved and closed out in order to proceed with the next stage. 6.1.3 Further, the following are required to reach 60% milestone completion:-  Latest revision of P&ID and Line List  Equipment, package items vendor drawings  Piping stress analysis  Special pipe supports sizes calculations  IFD Instrument hook-up details  Instrument Data (especially for all Inline Instruments) from Client approved Vendor Catalogues  Speciality items vendor data  E/I Main and branch cable tray sizes, tubing tray and conduit spaces  Vendor data and location of RIO Cabinets, Field Junction Boxes, Field local panels, light fittings, etc.  Instrument air manifolds and heat tracing systems manifolds typical calculations and sizing for distribution  Civil and structural design and calculations done using vendor data  Updates on buildings and structures (footprints, coordinates, elevations) 6.1.4 The model shall be clash checked and made clash free before the formal review
  • 13. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 13 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 6.2 Modelling & Review 6.2.1 All aspects of modelling and reviewing at 30% milestone (as in section 5.2) are also generally applicable to 60% milestone. 6.2.2 The 3D model at this milestone shall have progressed much further. Therefore, the review shall be extensive. All additional modelling done after the 30% milestone shall be reviewed. 6.2.3 Following shall be modelled and subsequently reviewed for 60% milestone:  In general, all modelling done so far shall be rechecked and updated with respect to latest available information  Equipments (as per latest available vendor drawings)  Most of the lines (80% to 90%)  Piping supports including secondary supports  It shall be ensured that under no circumstances is any piping support taken from monorails and crane beams.  Valves and speciality items accessibility check  All Operational platforms and cat ladders  Lay down area for equipments with removable internals (Exchanger tubes, column trays and packing, etc)  Movement of mobile / portable equipments  Maintenance beams, monorails, hoists, davits  Travel path of crane / hoist hooks taking into account the size of item being handled  Civil and structural modelling shall have proceeded with more details (Hand rails, bracings, fencing, etc)  Secondary structures  Drainage system showing drain width and invert levels  Fire proofing, wherever applicable  All Inline instruments  Valves (Emergency Isolation, Control, On/Off, Butterfly, Safety), Rupture Disc, Mass Flow Meter, Mag Flow Meter, Vortex Flow Meters, Orifice, Venturi, Thermowell, etc  All Offline Instruments  Electronic Transmitters, Level Instruments, etc  Instrument location, accessibility review  Instrument junction boxes  Instrument air and heat tracing systems manifolds  Lighting fixtures  Field panels
  • 14. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 14 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out.  E/I branch cable trays  Branch Trays of 150 mm and 100 mm shall be modelled. 75 mm and below sizes shall be site routed and will not be modelled.  Branch conduits (if any) shall not be modelled.  Spaces (envelope) for conduits (≥ Ø50 mm) and tubing trays (≥100 mm width)  Ductwork in process areas in more detail with the inline / online components  Fire fighting system (Sprinkler head locations, hydrants, monitors, foam tanks, deluge outlets locations, sprinkler and deluge pipe routing, valve manifold locations)  Architectural updates of buildings, walls, doors and windows (as applicable) 6.3 Outcome & Objectives 6.3.1 IFC Equipment Layouts 6.3.2 IFD Piping layouts 6.3.3 Piping MTO 6.3.4 Stress analysis of majority lines completed. 6.3.5 Main pipe supports completed 6.3.6 Special pipe supports completed 6.3.7 Detailing of Structural design Completion 6.3.8 IFC Civil and structural layouts  Shall Include secondary beams, staircases, handrails, equipment support beams, main structural framing sizes, roads & pavements layout, drainage system, location of main pipe supports, crane beams, monorails, hoists, Floor openings, etc 6.3.9 The civil and structural design, including equipment foundations confirmed for all the equipment loads and ready for permitting submission to authority 6.3.10 Structural steel MTO 6.3.11 Drainage Layout 6.3.12 Instrumentation location plans, lighting layouts, cable tray layouts & field panel locations 6.3.13 Fire protection Layouts
  • 15. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 15 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 7.0 90% MODEL REVIEW The main focus of the 90% model review is to close-out all the action points from previous reviews, complete the modelling of all disciplines in all respects and subsequently issue all final IFC drawings and documents 7.1 90% Review Stage Requirements 7.1.1 Following are required to reach 90% milestone completion:-  All Input documents IFC Status  P&ID, Line List, etc.  Approved equipment and package vendor drawings  Approved vendor drawings of all modelled items (all disciplines)  Approved Instrument vendor drawings  Approved Vendor drawings for speciality items, safety showers, etc.  Structural steel design and modelling completed.  IFC Civil and structural drawings  Stress analysis completed.  Main piping supports modelled as per designed information.  Fire Protection, fire proofing ( as applicable), escape ways (including associated stairs and ladders), hand rails, drains etc are designed/ approved in-line with Authorities requirements 7.1.2 The model shall be clash checked and made clash free before the formal review
  • 16. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 16 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 7.2 Modelling & Review 7.2.1 Following shall be modelled and subsequently reviewed for 90% milestone:  In general, all modelling done so far shall be rechecked and updated with respect to latest available information  Final review of Operability, maintainability and constructability  Escape ways, stairs, ladders, operation platforms reviewed as final  All discipline items modelled as per dimensions given in approved vendor drawings  All piping including small bore  (Except tubing. Envelopes provided for tubing and trays including insulation / lagging)  All piping supports  (Including Springs, snubbers, rod hangers)  Safety shower and eye wash as per vendor drawing.  All drawings and documents shall be ready for IFC issue.  Floor and wall openings  All supports  (trays, ducts, fire protection pipe work and all secondary pipe supports)  All equipment handling equipments such as hoists, monorails, EOT cranes, beams, etc are reviewed using final vendor drawings and weights for maintenance requirements  Building internal facility modelling, if required
  • 17. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 17 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 7.3 Outcome & Objectives 7.3.1 This is the final formal review of the 3D model. Any subsequent reviews will be specific and pertaining only to the closeout of the comments. 7.3.2 IFC Isometrics  Refer to Isometrics Flowchart WI-LL-24f3 in Section 9.0 of this Work Instruction. 7.3.3 All pipe support drawings 7.3.4 IFC Piping layouts 7.3.5 Final issue of equipment layouts, plant layouts, overall plot plan 7.3.6 Final MTO 7.3.7 IFC Main pipe support drawings 7.3.8 Structural steel layouts, elevations of all pipe racks, process structures, equipment support structures, platforms, ladders, stairs, gratings, floor plates, etc. issued 7.3.9 All other miscellaneous civil fabrication drawings and details done. 7.3.10 Floor opening and wall penetration drawings and details shall be completed. 7.3.11 Tray layouts IFC 7.3.12 Lighting layouts IFC 7.3.13 Instrument location plans IFC 7.3.14 Duct layouts IFC 7.3.15 Fire protection system – layouts, sprinkler heads, deluge outlets & their piping layouts IFC
  • 18. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 18 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 8.0 MILESTONES SCOPE MATRIX 8.1 Piping and Mechanical: Modelling Scope 1st Client Review 2 nd Client Review Final Review Remarks / Comments 30% 60% 90% Piping Modelling  Number of lines and pipe sizes as agreed with Client for each milestone X X X Only Preliminary Routing @ 30% All Underground Piping X X Equipments X X X Safety Showers X X Utility Stations X X Sample points X In-Line Piping Components X X In-Line Instrumentation & Speciality X X Critical Lines Identified For Stress Analysis X Critical Lines Compliance to Stress Requirements X Pipe Racks & Sub-Racks X X Location Only Primary Pipe Supports X Detailed By Stress Engineer Secondary Pipe Supports X X Note: Ensure that under no circumstances is any piping support taken from monorails and crane beams Equipment Supports X X Location Only Withdrawal Spaces X Maintenance Space X X Escape routes X X Pull out space and lay down area X X Davits and Equipment Manholes X X Lifting Lugs X X Vendor Packages, Modules, & Skid Units X X Future Equipment X Inline and Offline Instruments X X Insulation for Pipes X X X Floor Drainage and associated pipe work above ground X X Runway & Lifting Modelling Volume X X
  • 19. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 19 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 8.2 Building Services: Modelling Scope 1st Client Review 2 nd Client Review Final Review Remarks / Comments 30% 60% 90% BS Piping X X BS Equipment X X X Fire protection and fire fighting system X X X In-Line Piping Components X In-Line Instrumentation & Speciality X Plumbing Services – only for underground X X Fire Protection Piping (underground) X Fire Protection Piping (aboveground) X Critical Lines Identified For Stress Analysis X Critical Lines Compliance to Stress Requirements X Primary BS Pipe Supports X Secondary BS Pipe Supports X X BS Equipment Supports X X Extract Fans & Fan Filter Heaters X Ventilation Ductwork & Insulation X Ductwork In-line Components X Ductwork In-line Instrumentation X Dedicated Extract Systems X Main Ductwork Support Steels X Major Ducting X Dampers X Fans, withdrawal space X X Low Wall exhaust Grilles X X X Sprinkler Headers, Deluge lines X Sprinkler Lines X Piping X  Modelled by Piping based on inputs provided by Building Services
  • 20. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 20 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 8.3 Civil and Structural: Modelling Scope 1st Client Review 2 nd Client Review Final Review Remarks / Comments 30% 60% 90% Primary Steelwork X X X Connection details X X Critical Insert-plate details X X Modular Pipe Racks X X X Typical Details X X X Hand railing X X Cat Ladders X X Checker Plate & Grating X X Steel Staircases X X Stair Towers X X Purlins & Side Rails X X Vessel Supports X X Critical Pipe Supports X X Concrete Floor Slabs X X Concrete Floor Penetrations X Floor Sumps X X Mezzanine Concrete Floors X X Concrete Walls X X Concrete Wall Penetrations X Retaining Walls X X Bund Area’s X X X Foundations X X X Concrete Up-stands & Plinths X Pits & Trenches X X Underground Drainage X X X Columns & Beams X X X Trimmers X Runway and lifting beams / lifting eye X X Pipe Rack & Structural Pipe Supports X X X Preliminary walk-on ceiling (extent) X X Secondary Supports X X
  • 21. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 21 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. Modelling Scope 1st Client Review 2 nd Client Review Final Review Remarks / Comments 30% 60% 90% Concrete Floors X X X Lift Pits X Pre-Cast Core Walls X Equipment Base Grout X X Anchor Bolt Setting X X
  • 22. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 22 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 8.4 Architectural: Note: Architectural details will be modelled only when the building internal areas are to be modelled. They will not be modelled, if only building shell has to be modelled as envelope Modelling Scope 1st Client Review 2 nd Client Review Final Review Remarks / Comments 30% 60% 90% Exterior Masonry Walls X Exterior Masonry Wall Opes X Interior Partition Walls X X Interior Partition Walls Opes X X Exterior Cladding X Louver Panels X X Suspended Ceilings X Doors X Windows & Screens X Concrete Stairs X X Elevator Shaft X Roof Elements X X External Rain water Pipes X Sanitary Fittings X Laboratory Furniture & Fittings X Office Furniture & Fittings X Internal Walls X External Walls X Finish Floor Penetrations X X Windows, Vision Panels X Clean room False Ceiling X Doors, Vision Panels X Laboratory Benches X Lockers Area Furniture X
  • 23. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 23 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 8.5 Electrical: Modelling Scope 1st Client Review 2 nd Client Review Final Review Remarks / Comments 30% 60% 90% Main Cable Trays Routes (for power, control & auxiliary systems) X X Branch Cable Tray Routes X X Electrical MCC room Equipment (Dry type transformer, Switchgear, MCC etc.) X Electrical Misc. Panels (various panels outside electrical rooms X X Electrical junction box, local switches / push button stations. X X Light Fittings X X Underground trenches, duct banks X X Supports For Main Cable Trays X By Civil and Structural Support For Branch/Cable Trays X X By Civil and Structural Supports for Junction Boxes, local switches, push buttons, electrical panels outside electrical rooms X X By Civil and Structural (for electrical panels only)
  • 24. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 24 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 8.6 Instrumentation: Modelling Scope 1st Client Review 2 nd Client Review Final Review Remarks / Comments 30% 60% 90% Instrumentation Junction Boxes X X X Remote I/O Panels X X X Main Instrumentation Cable Tray Layout X X X PAT Cabinet Location X X PAT Container Location X X X Local Control Panel/PLC Panel Location X X X Instrument Air manifold Location X X Offline instruments X X Offline instruments on pipe lines are modelled by piping Branch cable trays (≥100mm width) X X Instruments Drain connection to common Drain Funnel as shown in the P&ID & Instrument Hook-ups X X (By piping, if line number is given to the drain line)
  • 25. SING-WI-300-01f1 Rev0 July 2008 Department Work Instruction Document No: SING-WI-LL-24 Page : 25 of 25 3D Model Review Procedure Supersedes: Nil Revision: 0 Issue Date: 04 January 2010 Issuing Department: Quality – Singapore Functional Department: Piping Department Previous Rev & Issue Date: Nil Effective Date: 04 January 2010 The current applicable version of this publication resides on JNET Singapore Office – Quality Page. This copy is considered as UNCONTROLLED once printed out. 9.0 RELATED DOCUMENTATION (REFERENCES) WI-LL-24f1 : Model Review and Comments Recording Spreadsheet WI-LL-24f1.XLS WI-LL-24f2 : 3D Workflow Diagram WI-LL-24f2.dwg WI-LL-24f3 : Isometric Flowchart WI-LL-24f3.xls WI-LL-24f4 : Weekly Action Log WI-LL-24f4.xls Double Click on Icons to display the document 10.0 RECORDS The weekly / daily review action logs, the line wise review & comments recorded on the Line List and the Model Review and Comments Recording Spreadsheets shall be preserved as part of the project documentation.