This document provides information about the Journal of Entomology and Nematology (JEN), including its scope, peer-review process, author instructions, and editor/editorial board details. JEN is an open access journal that publishes articles in all areas of entomology and nematology. It accepts original research articles, short communications, and reviews. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed by members of the editorial board or outside reviewers. The journal aims to publish manuscripts within weeks of submission.
2. ABOUT JEN
TheJournal of Entomology and Nematology (JEN) (ISSN: 2006-9855)is published monthly (one volume peryear) by
Academic Journals.
Journal of Entomology and Nematology (JEN) is an open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly)
of articles in all areas of the subject such as applications of entomology in solving crimes, taxonomy and control
of insects and arachnids, changes in the spectrum of mosquito-borne diseases etc.
The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific
excellence. Papers will be published shortly after acceptance. All articles published in JEN are peer-reviewed.
SubmissionofManuscript
Please read the Instructions for Authors before submitting your manuscript. Themanuscript files should be given
the last name of the firstauthor
Click here to Submit manuscripts online
If you have any difficulty using the online submission system, kindly submit via this email
jen@academicjournals.org.
With questions or concerns, please contact the Editorial Office at jen@academicjournals.org.
3. Editors
Dr. Mukesh K. Dhillon
ICRISAT
GT-Biotechnology, ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324,
Andhra Pradesh,
India
Dr. Lotfalizadeh Hosseinali
Department of Insect Taxonomy
Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection
Tehran, P. O. B. 19395-1454,
Iran
Prof. Liande Wang
Faculty of Plant Protection,
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
Fuzhou, 350002,
P.R. China
Dr. Raul Neghina
Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Timisoara,
Romania
Prof. Fukai Bao
Kunming Medical University
191 Western Renmin Road, Kunming, Yunnan,
PR of China
Dr. Anil Kumar Dubey
Department of Entomology,
National Taiwan University, Sec. 4, Lane 119, Taipei,
Taiwan 107
Dr. Mona Ahmed Hussein
National Research Centre, Centre of Excellence for
Advanced Sciences, El-Behooth Street, Dokki,
Cairo, Egypt
Associate Editors
Dr. Sam Manohar Das
Dept. of PG studies and Research Centre in Zoology,
Scott Christian College (Autonomous),
Nagercoil – 629 003,
Kanyakumari District,India
Dr. Leonardo Gomes
UNESP
Av. 24A, n 1515, Depto de Biologia, IB, Zip Code:
13506-900,
Rio Claro, SP,
Brazil.
Dr. J. Stanley
Vivekananda Institute of Hill Agriculture
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Almora–
263601, Uttarakhand,
India
Dr. Ramesh Kumar Jain
Indian Council of Agricultural Research,
Division of Nematology, IARI
New Delhi-110012
India
Dr. Hasan Celal Akgul
Istanbul Plant Quarantine Service, Nematology
Laboratory
Halkali Merkez Mahallesi, Halkali Caddesi, No:2,
34140 Halkali, Kucukcekmece-Istanbul
Turkey
Dr. James E. Cilek
Florida A & M University
4000 Frankford Avenue, Panama City, Florida 32405
USA
Dr. Khan Matiyar Rahaman
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya
AICRP (Nematode), Directorate of Research,
BCKV, PO. Kalyani, Dist. Nadia, PIN-741235,
West Bengal,
India
Manas Sarkar
Defence Research Laboratory
(DRDO, Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India)
Post Bag No.2, Tezpur-784001, Assam,
India
4. Mehdi Esfandiari
Department of Plant Protection
College of Agriculture,
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz,
Ahvaz, Iran
Prof. Dr. Mahfouz M. M. Abd-Elgawad
Nematology Laboratory
Department of Phytopathology
National Research Center El-Tahrir St., Dokki
12622, Giza,
Egypt
Matthew S. Lehnert
Department of Entomology, Soils, & Plant Sciences
Clemson University,Clemson,
United States
Wenjing Pang
3318 SE 23rd Avenue
Gainesville, FL 32641
Agronomy and Biotechnological College,
China Agricultural University,Beijing,
China
Dr. G. Shyam Prasad
Directorate of Sorghum Research (DSR),
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 500030, AP,
INDIA
Dr. Rashid Mumtaz
Date Palm Research
Plant Protection Department
Food & Agricultural Sciences
King Saud University, Riyadh
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Editorial Board
Godwin Fuseini
International SOS Ghana,
Newmont Ghana Gold,
Ahafo mine,
Ghana.
Dr. Waqas Wakil
Department of Agriculture Entomology,
University of Agriculture, Faisalabad,
Pakistan
Gilberto Santos Andrade
Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Avenida Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n Campus Universitário
36570-000
Viçosa - MG - Brazil
Ricardo Botero Trujillo
Calle 117 D # 58-50 apto. 515
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá,
Colombia
Dr. D. N. Kambrekar
Regional Agricultural Research Station,
UAS Campus, PB. No. 18,
Bijapur-586 101 Karnataka-INDIA
India
Dr. P. Pretheep Kumar
Department of Forest Biology
Forest College & Research Institute
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
Mettupalayam – 641 301
Tamil Nadu, India
Dr. Raman Chandrasekar
College of Agriculture Entomology
S-225, Agriculture Science Center
University of Kentucky
Lexington, KY 40546-0091
USA.
Dr. Rajesh Kumar
Central Muga Eri Research and Training Institute
Lahdoigarh, Jorhat-785700, Assam,
India
5. Prof. Ding Yang
Department of Entomology,
China Agricultural University,
2 yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian,
Beijing 100193, China
Dr. Harsimran Gill
University of Florida
970 Natural Area Drive, PO Box 110620,
Gainesville, Florida- 32611
Dr. Mehdi Gheibi
Department of Plant Protection,
College of Agriculture, Shiraz Islamic
Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Dr. Nidhi KakKar
University College, Kurukshetra University,
Kurukshetra, Haryana, India
Dr. Marianna I. Zhukovskaya
Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology
and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
44 Thorez Ave, 194223,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Gaurav Goyal
University of Florida
282#14 Corry village,
Gainesville, FL 32603, USA
Gilberto Santos Andrade
Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Avenida Peter Henry Rolfs,
s/n Campus Universitario
36570-000 Vicosa - MG -
Brazil
Joshi Yadav Prasad
Gyanashwor Kathmandu, Nepal
G P O Box: 8975 EPC:
5519, Kathmandu, Nepal
India
Baoli Qiu
Department of Entomology,
South China Agricultural University
No 483, Wushan Road, Tianhe, Guangzhou,
PR China 510640
T. Ramasubramanian
Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres
(Indian Council of Agricultural Research)
Barrackpore, Kolkata – 700 120,
India
Leonardo Gomes
UNESP Av. 24A, n 1515, Depto de Biologia,
IB, Zip Code: 13506-900, Rio Claro,
SP, Brazil.
Hasan Celal Akgul
Istanbul Plant Quarantine Service,
Nematology Laboratory
Halkali Merkez Mahallesi,
Halkali Caddesi, No:2, 34140 Halkali,
Kucukcekmece-Istanbul/Turkey
J. Stanley
Vivekananda Institute of Hill Agriculture
Indian Council of Agricultural Research,
Almora– 263601, Uttarakhand, India
Atef Sayed Abdel-Razek
National Research Centre,
Dept. of Plant Protection
El-Tahrir Street, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
6. InstructionsforAuthor
Electronic submission of manuscripts is strongly
encouraged, provided that the text, tables, and figures are
included in a single Microsoft Word file (preferably in Arial
font).
The cover letter should include the corresponding author's
full address and telephone/fax numbers and should be in
an e-mail message sent to the Editor, with the file, whose
name should begin with the first author's surname, as an
attachment.
Article Types
Three types of manuscripts may be submitted:
Regular articles: These should describe new and carefully
confirmed findings, and experimental procedures should
be given in sufficient detail for others to verify the work.
The length of a full paper should be the minimum required
to describe and interpret the work clearly.
Short Communications: A Short Communication is suitable
for recording the results of complete small investigations
or giving details of new models or hypotheses, innovative
methods, techniques or apparatus. The style of main
sections need not conform to that of full-length papers.
Short communications are 2 to 4 printed pages (about 6 to
12 manuscript pages) in length.
Reviews: Submissions of reviews and perspectives covering
topics of current interest are welcome and encouraged.
Reviews should be concise and no longer than 4-6 printed
pages (about 12 to 18 manuscript pages). Reviews are also
peer-reviewed.
Review Process
All manuscripts are reviewed by an editor and members of
the Editorial Board or qualified outside reviewers. Authors
cannot nominate reviewers. Only reviewers randomly
selected from our database with specialization in the
subject area will be contacted to evaluate the manuscripts.
The process will be blind review.
Decisions will be made as rapidly as possible, and the
journal strives to return reviewers’ comments to authors as
fast as possible. The editorial board will re-review
manuscripts that are accepted pending revision. It is the
goal of the AJFS to publish manuscripts within weeks after
submission.
Regular articles
All portions of the manuscript must be typed double-
spaced and all pages numbered starting from the title
page.
The Title should be a brief phrase describing the contents
of the paper. The Title Page should include the authors'
full names and affiliations, the name of the corresponding
author along with phone, fax and E-mail information.
Present addresses of authors should appear as a footnote.
The Abstract should be informative and completely self-
explanatory, briefly present the topic, state the scope of
the experiments, indicate significant data, and point out
major findings and conclusions. The Abstract should be
100 to 200 words in length.. Complete sentences, active
verbs, and the third person should be used, and the
abstract should be written in the past tense. Standard
nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should
be avoided. No literature should be cited.
Following the abstract, about 3 to 10 key words that will
provide indexing references should be listed.
A list of non-standard Abbreviations should be added. In
general, non-standard abbreviations should be used only
when the full term is very long and used often. Each
abbreviation should be spelled out and introduced in
parentheses the first time it is used in the text. Only
recommended SI units should be used. Authors should
use the solidus presentation (mg/ml). Standard
abbreviations (such as ATP and DNA) need not be defined.
The Introduction should provide a clear statement of the
problem, the relevant literature on the subject, and the
proposed approach or solution. It should be
understandable to colleagues from a broad range of
scientific disciplines.
Materials and methods should be complete enough to
allow experiments to be reproduced. However, only truly
new procedures should be described in detail; previously
published procedures should be cited, and important
modifications of published procedures should be mentioned
briefly. Capitalize trade names and include the
manufacturer's name and address. Subheadings should be
used. Methods in general use need not be described in
detail.
7. Results should be presented with clarity and precision.
The results should be written in the past tense when
describing findings in the authors' experiments.
Previously published findings should be written in the
present tense. Results should be explained, but largely
without referring to the literature. Discussion,
speculation and detailed interpretation of data should
not be included in the Results but should be put into the
Discussion section.
The Discussion should interpret the findings in view of
the results obtained in this and in past studies on this
topic. State the conclusions in a few sentences at the end
of the paper. The Results and Discussion sections can
include subheadings, and when appropriate, both
sections can be combined.
The Acknowledgments of people, grants, funds, etc
should be brief.
Tables should be kept to a minimum and be designed to
be as simple as possible. Tables are to be typed double-
spaced throughout, including headings and footnotes.
Each table should be on a separate page, numbered
consecutively in Arabic numerals and supplied with a
heading and a legend. Tables should be self-explanatory
without reference to the text. The details of the methods
used in the experiments should preferably be described
in the legend instead of in the text. The same data should
not be presented in both table and graph form or
repeated in the text.
Figure legends should be typed in numerical order on a
separate sheet. Graphics should be prepared using
applications capable of generating high resolution GIF,
TIFF, JPEG or Powerpoint before pasting in the Microsoft
Word manuscript file. Tables should be prepared in
Microsoft Word. Use Arabic numerals to designate
figures and upper case letters for their parts (Figure 1).
Begin each legend with a title and include sufficient
description so that the figure is understandable without
reading the text of the manuscript. Information given in
legends should not be repeated in the text.
References: In the text, a reference identified by means
of an author‘s name should be followed by the date of
the reference in parentheses. When there are more than
two authors, only the first author‘s name should be
mentioned, followed by ’et al‘. In the event that an
author cited has had two or more works published during
the same year, the reference, both in the text and in the
reference list, should be identified by a lower case letter
like ’a‘ and ’b‘ after the date to distinguish the works.
Examples:
Abayomi (2000), Agindotan et al. (2003), (Kelebeni,
1983), (Usman and Smith, 1992), (Chege, 1998;
1987a,b; Tijani, 1993,1995), (Kumasi et al., 2001)
References should be listed at the end of the paper in
alphabetical order. Articles in preparation or articles
submitted for publication, unpublished observations,
personal communications, etc. should not be included
in the reference list but should only be mentioned in
the article text (e.g., A. Kingori, University of Nairobi,
Kenya, personal communication). Journal names are
abbreviated according to Chemical Abstracts. Authors
are fully responsible for the accuracy of the references.
Examples:
Chikere CB, Omoni VT and Chikere BO (2008).
Distribution of potential nosocomial pathogens in a
hospital environment. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7: 3535-3539.
Moran GJ, Amii RN, Abrahamian FM, Talan DA (2005).
Methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus in
community-acquired skin infections. Emerg. Infect. Dis.
11: 928-930.
Pitout JDD, Church DL, Gregson DB, Chow BL,
McCracken M, Mulvey M, Laupland KB (2007).
Molecular epidemiology of CTXM-producing
Escherichia coli in the Calgary Health Region:
emergence of CTX-M-15-producing isolates.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 1281-1286.
Pelczar JR, Harley JP, Klein DA (1993). Microbiology:
Concepts and Applications. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York,
pp. 591-603.
Short Communications
Short Communications are limited to a maximum of
two figures and one table. They should present a
complete study that is more limited in scope than is
found in full-length papers. The items of manuscript
preparation listed above apply to Short
Communications with the following differences: (1)
Abstracts are limited to 100 words; (2) instead of a
separate Materials and Methods section, experimental
procedures may be incorporated into Figure Legends
and Table footnotes; (3) Results and Discussion should
be combined into a single section.
Proofs and Reprints: Electronic proofs will be sent (e-
mail attachment) to the corresponding author as a PDF
file. Page proofs are considered to be the final version
of the manuscript. With the exception of typographical
or minor clerical errors, no changes will be made in the
manuscript at the proof stage.
9. InternationalJournalofMedicine and MedicalSciencesJournal of Entomology and Nematology
Table of Contents: Volume 7 Number 1, January, 2015
ARTICLES
Population dynamics and damages of onion thrips (Thripstabaci)
(Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on onion in Northeastern Ethiopia
Yeshitla Merene
11. 2 J. Entomol. Nematol.
Figure 1.Seasonal thrips population dynamics in onion field at Shewarobit.
versus reduction in crop yield have established allowable
levels of damage or economic thresholds. However
Onion growers in the study area apply insecticide for the
control of thrips regardless of growing seasons and
without monitoring thrips population. Knowledge of
insect population dynamics can help to predict
where and when infestations will occur, how big
they will become, and how long they will stay.
This information is very helpful to apply the right
pest control measure at the right time. Therefore,
the objectives of the study was to assess changes in
seasonal fluctuation of thrips population and to determine
yield loss caused by thrips on onion transplanted at
different times of the year.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was carried out in Kewet district of Amhara region
(Ethiopia) with longitude and latitude of 10°00′N 39°54′E and an
elevation of 1350 m above sea level. It is 230 km north east of
Addis Ababa.
Thrips population dynamics and yield loss on onion was studded
using five transplanting dates of two months interval with and
without spray of insecticide (Selecron 720 EC 720 EC) at the rate of
1 L ha-1
. The treatments were arranged in randomized complete
block design (RCBD) with five replications. Insecticide application
was done every two weeks throughout the growing period.
The plot size was 5 x 4 m containing six ridges of 100 plants per
ridge. Prior to planting, the plot was irrigated to settle the soil and
facilitate the planting operations. Healthy and vigorous seedlings of
two months old and 12- 15 cm height were carefully uprooted from
the seedbed and planted in two rows of 10 centimeter distance on
each ridge. The ridge and furrow space were 20 and 40 centimeter
respectively. Irrigation was done on weekly interval unless there
was rain. To protect the onion from the two common fungal
diseases (Powdery mildew and purple blotch) all the experimental
plots were sprayed with mancozeb 80 WP (2 L ha-1
).
Every 15 days five onion plants from 2nd
and 5th
ridge were
randomly taken on labeled polythene bag for thrips (adult and
nymph) counting in the lab with aid of 10 x magnifying hand lens. At
harvest, total and marketable bulb yields were collected from the 3rd
and 4th
ridges. Marketable bulb yield was obtained after discarding
unmarketable bulbs, which includes (undersized, diseased,
decayed and physiologically disordered bulbs) from the total bulb
yield. Daily records of rainfall and temperature (maximum and
minimum) for the study period were taken from Shewarobit
meteorological station. Daily relative humidity was recorded three
times a day using hygrometer. Yield loss for each transplanting
period was calculated using the formula indicated below:
% Yield loss = [(Yield of sprayed- Yield of unsprayed) / (Yield of
sprayed)] X100
Data on bulb yield and thrips count per plant for each treatment
were analyzed using SAS statistical software. Thrips counts per
plant were transformed using log transformation to reduce the
skewness of the parameter and fulfill the assumption of normality in
ANOVA. Correlation analysis was used to determine the
associations between mean monthly thrips count with mean
monthly rainfall, temperature and relative humidity.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Thrips population was low during the months of July to
November 2003 and in April 2004. During these periods,
mean thrips count per plant was below ten. Thrips
population started increasing in December and reached
the pick value of 159 thrips per plant in March (Figure 1).
Very few thrips was first observed on newly transplanted
onion seedlings two weeks after transplanting. Thrips
population was low at early growth stage, started
increasing after six leaves growth stage and reached its
peak (50 thrips per plant) at 10 leaves growth stage and
decreased at crop maturity (Figures 1 and 2). Thrips
population on onion was high from six to ten leaves
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Nov1,2003
Nov16,2003
Dec1,2003
Dec16,2003
Jan1,2004
Jan16,2004
Feb1,2004
Feb15,2004
Mar1,2004
Mar16,2004
Apr1,2004
Apr16,2004
May1,2004
May16,2004
Jun1,2004
Jun16,2004
Jul1,2004
Jul16,2004
Aug1,2004
Aug16,2004
Sep1,2004
Sep16,2004
Date
Meannumberofleavesfor
sampledplants
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
thripscountperplant
leaves/plant thrips/plant
12. Merene 3
Figure 2. Mean number of thrips per plant at different growth stage of onion.
Table 1. Mean total bulb yield, yield loss due to thrips and thrips infestation at different planting dates in 2003/2004 at Shewarobit.
Planting dates
Total bulb yield in qt ha
-1
SE Yield loss *Mean umber of thrips per plantSE
Un sprayed Sprayed P (value) In (qt ha
-1
) % loss Un sprayed Sprayed P (value)
Mid October 2003 166.610.9a 258.532.7a 0.035 91.9 35.6 22.33.2b 6.91.4c 0.001
Mid December 2003 108.718.4a 269.613.8a 0.003 160.9 59.7 74.98.3a 20.5 1.9a 0.01
Mid February 2004 95.812.7a 169.520.2b 0.049 73.7 43.5 18.3 6.6c 10.9 2.2b 0.37
Mid April 2004 107.114.8a 133.931.3b 0.44 ns ns 16.7 2.3c 21.22.5a 0.24
Mid June 2004 129.630.2a 149.714.5b 0.58 ns ns 2.70.82d 0.9 0.2d 0.096
Mean 121.5 9.2 196.315.1 0.001 74.8 38.1 26.9 5.5 12.1 1.8 0.01
*Means in the column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (P>0.05). Means with in the row are not significantly different when P
(value) >0.05. *Mean number of thrips per plant pooled from count taken at 30,45,60,75 and 90 DAP (N=125). SE=standard error of the mean.
growth stages because these succulent leaves are highly
preferred by the thrips and it also provides many crevices
into which the thrips can creep for protection. This thrips
population peak is the actively bulbing growth stage of
onion and it probably attributed to the highest bulb yield
loss. Thrips population reduces when the crop gets
maturity because the leaf nutritional value decline and
also become tougher and lignified and cannot be rasped
by thrips. During onion maturity stage adult thrips are
forced to move towards other hosts. This is in agreement
with the result of previous study on onion Workman and
Martin (2002).
There is an inverse relation between thrips population
and mean monthly rainfall (r= -0.93, p= 0.02). Sharp
decline in thrips population was observed during rainy
seasons. This is because of the fact that the rain washed
out the thrips from the plant. Similar results were also
reported by different authors (Tsedeke, 1986;
Dominicano et al. (1993). On the other hand, there is no
significant correlation between thrips count per plant and
maximum air temperature (r=0.09, P=0.7), minimum
temperature (r= -0.15, P=0.6) and relative humidity (r=-
0.33, P=0.3). Hence, changes in thrips abundance were
not attributed to seasonal variation of temperature and
relative humidity. Pearsall and Myers (2000) also found
that seasonal changes in temperature did not appear to
result in any consistent effect on western flower thrips
densities and damage level in British Columbia.
On insecticide sprayed onion, the effect of planting
dates on onion bulb yield is highly significant. The highest
total bulb yield of 258.5 and 269.6 Qt ha
-1
and marketable
bulb yield of 248.8 and 258.7 Qt ha
-1
were obtained from
October and December planted onions respectively
(Tables 1 and 2). The reason for high bulb yield at
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
15 DAT 30 DAT 45 DAT 60 DAT 75DAT 90 DAT
Crop growth stage
No. of leaves per plant
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Thrips count per plant
No.of leaves per plant Thrips count per plant
13. 4 J. Entomol. Nematol.
Table 2. Mean marketable bulb yield and its loss due to thrips at different planting dates in 2003/2004 at Shewarobit.
Planting dates
Marketable bulb yield in qt ha
-1
SE Yield loss
Un sprayed Sprayed P (value) In ( qt ha
-1
) % loss
Mid October 2003 145.310.9a 248.832.2a 0.023 103.5 41.6
Mid December 2003 81.614.4a 258.713.5a 0.002 177.1 68.5
Mid February 2004 88.513.7a 158.823.8b 0.04 70.3 44.3
Mid April 2004 99.816.1a 128.732.7b 0.42 ns ns
Mid June 2004 12531.6a 146.815.5b 0.56 ns ns
Mean 1089.1 188.315.0 0.001 80.3 42.6
Means in the column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (P>0.05). Means within the row are not
significantly different when P (value) >0.05.
October and December plantings are the coincidence of
early growth stage with cool weather condition and warm
conditions during bulbing, bulb maturity and harvesting
stages, which are the optimal climatic condition favorable
for high yield and quality onion bulb production Tindall
(1983). Similar results of thrips population pick in March
and maximum onion yield on November and December
transplant has been reported on recent study conducted
in Sokoto, Nigeria by Ibrahim (2010).
Damage caused by thrips on onion varies depending
on time of transplanting. Significant yield loss was
observed in onion planted during dry seasons (October -
February) (Tables 1 and 2). In October transplanted
onion there were 41.6 % marketable and 35.6 % total
bulb yield loss because the population of thrips on the
different growth stages was on average 22.3 thrips/plant
in untreated plot. The maximum total bulb yield loss of
59.7% and marketable bulb yield loss of 68.5% occurred
on December planted onion with an average infestation
level of 75 thrips per plant on uncontrolled plots (Tables 1
and 2). On average, total and marketable bulb yield loss
of 38.1 and 42.6 % were recorded for the study period in
Shewarobit area (Tables 1 and 2). Previous study
conducted in Awash valley of Ethiopia (Tsedeke, 1983)
reported 33.5% onion bulb yield loss. Rueda and Shelton
(1955) have also stated up to 66% damage in tropical
countries.
Conclusion
Most of the farmers in the study area have the awareness
and use insecticide to control thrips, but it was not
effective as they do not apply the recommended rate and
miss monitoring thrips population before spray. In the
management of thrips, the most important conclusion of
this study is the requirement of an integrated thrips
management options to minimize insect population and
damage for onions transplanted from October to April.
Moreover six to ten leaves growth stage is the most
vulnerable stages for thrips. Hence, it is recommended to
properly monitor and apply integrated thrips management
options for onion production under irrigation for the study
area and other similar areas. Moreover for researchers
interested on the study of thrips population ecology it
would be advisable to adjust the sampling schedule at six
to ten leaves growth stages of onion.
Conflict of interests
The authorhas not declared any conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Dominicano NL, Ota AY,Tedardi CR (1993). Population fluctuation of
thrips on onion, its association with climatic elements and
control.Anais da sociedade entomological do brasil.22:77-83.
Ibrahim ND (2010). Seasonal Abundance of Onion thrips,
ThripsTabaciLindeman in Sokoto, Nigeria. J. Agric. Sci. 2(1): 107 -
114.
Lemma D, Shimeles A (2003). Research Experience in onion
production. Research Report.Ethiop. Agric. Res. Org. (55):8-29.
Pearsall I, Myers JH (2000). Population dynamics of Western Flower
Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in nectarine orchards In British
Colombia. J. Econ. Entomol.93: 264-275.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.2.264.
Rueda A, Shelton (1995). Onion thrips.Cornel international Institute for
Food, Agriculture and Development, Cornel University.Global crop
pest.http://web.entomology.cornell.edu/shelton/veg-insects-
global/english/thrips.html
Tindall HD (1983). Vegetables in the tropics. Macmillan press Ltd,
London. 456p.
Tsedeke A (1983). Insecticidal control of onion thrips, Thripstabaci, In
the Awash valley, Ethiopia. Ethiopian J. Agric. Sci. 5(2):109-118.
Tsedeke A (1986). A review of vegetable insect and mite pest
management research in Ethiopia. A review of crop protection
research in Ethiopia. pp. 479-494. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Workman PJ, Martin NA (2002). Towards integrated management of
Thripstabaci in onion.New Zealand plant protection. 55:188-192.
14. Journal of Entomology and
Nematology
Related Journals Published by Academic Journals
Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Reviews
African Journal of Microbiology Research
African Journal of Biochemistry Research
African Journal of Environmental Science and
Technology
African Journal of Food Science
African Journal of Plant Science
Journal of Bioinformatics and Sequence Analysis
International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation