Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty Essay

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty Essay
Should the death penalty be legal? This simple question sparks a lot of controversy and is the topic of many debates. For countries like China and
Saudi Arabia, they say yes. But, for the United States, only about 62% of people agree. A number of execution methods have been used such as firing
squad, hanging, electrocution, and most recently, lethal injection. Both Dave Anderson and Robert Blecker are supporters of the death penalty, but
they both are not necessarily for the current execution methods available. Nick Gillespie and Jeffrey Toobin are against the death penalty, stating that it
is not only immoral, but is expensive and violates the Eighth Amendment. While both sides of this debate provide reasonable arguments, neither side
contributes enough to win the debate. Since 1973, 144 people that were on death row have be executed. The supporters of the death penalty believe that
by executing "the worst of the worst" will decrease crime, provide substantial punishments, and promote happiness and safety throughout the country.
Supporters are trying to find solutions to legalize the death penalty in the United States that is not considered cruel and unusual punishment, while still
providing justice for the victims and their families. "Most of the arguments against the death penalty; those of inherent unfairness and bias towards the
poor or racial minorities or the devastating potential for mistaken execution are both fallacious and misleading" (Anderson 2016). Dave
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Death Penalty Pros And Cons Research Paper
This paper explores the cons of death penalty in the American society. America's history and political ethos are all about liberty. The Declaration of
Independence declares that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are unalienable rights, however, both life and life and the pursuit of happiness also
depend on liberty as a fundamental bedrock of the country. Ages until the early part of the twentieth century, was devoted to freeing society from the
shackles of death penalty. An agenda which should be embraced by all the Americans. TheUnited States Constitution constitution strictly avows
respect for life. The restraints place on the government in the Constitution by the Founders are but a failure. The death penalty uses cruel and unusual

The Death Penalty: Pros and Cons Essay
The Death Penalty. Immoral or moral; just or unjust? These are just a few of the questions people ask themselves when debating the Death Penalty
which is arguably the most controversial topic of the United States today. Every time these words come up, we start yelling out our opinions on what
we feel is right. Pro death penalty people shout deterrence across the room while the anti death penalty supporters shout about potentially killing an
innocent man; some argue that is just and the murders deserve their punishment while others say we are murdering people too if we kill the suspect.
Being one of the seventy– four countries that carry out the capital punishment, the United States is currently fourth in executions per year. Beyond this,
...show more content...
40 percent of the people on death row in 2007 were African Americans although whites committed more murders. The former mayor of Maryland,
Mister Martin O'Malley brought up another controversial discussion supporting abolishment s well stating that if we stopped the death penalty, "$22.4
million could pay for 500 additional police officers or provide drug treatment for 10,000 of our addicted neighbors. Unlike the death penalty, these are
investments that save lives and prevent violent crime"
There are often mistakes made that falsely determine an individual's sentence. Sloppy police work and loss of documents are examples of careless
errors. There is also some room for error with determining the results of a DNA sample that do not fall under the human error category. Many times
there may not be ample DNA samples at a crime scene. Only a fraction of crimes reveal DNA. Drive–by shootings and bombings often do not provide
DNA for investigation purposes. "There is a public perception that DNA is the cure–all for these kinds of mistakes. DNA is not the whole answer."
(Dieter, Richard) Eye witnesses cannot solely and accurately determine a person's fate 100 percent of the time. There are numerous amounts of cases in
which those found guilty were indeed later found innocent. Many times, these individuals have already served time in jail. Many argue that the time
inmates spend in

What is your standpoint on capital punishment? Capital punishment, also referred to as the death penalty, is a government sanctioned practice in which
it is legal to kill someone as punishment for a crime (What Is). The first known death penalty laws date back as far as the Eighteenth–Century B.C. in
the Code of King Hammurabi (Introduction). These death sentences were carried out by such means as crucifixion, drowning, beating to death,
burning alive, and impalement for 25 different crimes in Babylon. This practice has taken place in every century of some sort and still continues to be
practiced in certain places today. According to The Telegraph, 58 countries still execute citizens by means ofcapital punishment, with the U.S. being
one of the top four in leading executions (Mapped). The death penalty is a very strong topic and is a heated controversy among many world leaders. I,
personally, think that the death penalty should be rid of worldwide based on the possibility of innocence, civil and religious issues, and cost and
deterrence.
The first and foremost reason I oppose the death penalty can be due to the introduction of the Innocence Project. The Innocence Project, founded in
1992 by Peter Neufeld and Barry Scheck at Cardozo School of Law exonerates the wrongly convicted through DNA testing and reforms the criminal
justice system to prevent future injustice (Innocence Project). So far, the project has exonerated 351 inmates through DNA and has identified

The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty
The Death Penalty: Pros and Cons In this paper I will be discussing everything you need to know about the death penalty such as its pros and cons.
While the innocent can be killed, the death penalty has its pros because it prevents them from killing again if they are released or have escaped from
prison, it helps overpopulated prisons, and it can help victims' families get justice and closure. Not only can the innocent be killed, but in the past the
death penalty was very inhumane. To some its feels right but to others they feel like 2 wrongs don't make a right. Most people think that the defendant
deserves the death penalty, but what does the defendants' family think? First, the death penalty has its ups and downs because they could kill again if
the criminal is released or if he or she escapes prison. There have been cases where the criminal serves his/her time in prison, then gets released and
then kills again. They usually do this for two reasons: committing crime is all they are accustom to or they never learned their lesson while behind
bars. There have also been times where people have escaped prison and the only way they know they'll get away is by killing anyone that gets in
their way. Majority of the public believes that if the criminal gets out and kills again, it's the justice systems fault because it's their job to keep us safe.
In the past, the death penalty used to be more aggressive than it is nowadays. On the books there are four types of death penalty

Death Penalty Pros And Cons Essay
Cons of Capital Punishment Symphony Downey
Ms. Pearson
Fourth Hour
"At yearend 2013, thirty–five states and the Federal Bureau of Prisons held 2,979 inmates under sentence of death," (Snell,2014) . Approximately ten
percent of those people have severe mental illnesses. It also costs millions of dollars for every case associated with capital punishment which is
significantly more than cases not associated with the death penalty. There has also been little to no research done that actually proves that it deterscrime
at all. Capital Punishment is negative in several aspects, it kills many mentally ill men and women, it's very expensive, and it's inefficient. To begin,
many people who suffer from mental diseases have been killed due to the death penalty. Ten percent of people ondeath row have extremely severe
mental issues (The Facts: 13 Reasons to Oppose the Death Penalty, n.d.).One seventy–four year old man from Missouri, Cecil Clayton, was killed after
killing a cop although he...show more content...
A case lacking death penalty costs $520,000 less than a case with it. A case with the death penalty costs 1.26 million dollars whereas one without
costs $740,000. In Washington, the cost is a million dollars apart; cases with the penalty cost an average of $3.01 million and cases without cost
$2.01 million. Also, to support prisoners on death row, it costs taxpayers ninety thousand dollars more annually than a normal prisoner (Costs of the
Death Penalty, n.d.). The reason why it's more costly is because the Constitution requires a long judicial process for capital cases to ensure they don't
kill an innocent person, which still occasionally happens. In fact, in California studies show that to assure fair judgements in capital cases they would
have to spend approximately 232.7 million dollars yearly, but they only spend $137 million (Costs of the Death Penalty,

Death Penalty Pros And Cons
Opposing the Death Penalty When discussing the death penalty and its pros and cons, this subject can quickly become very controversial. Can one
really believe that an individual can commit a crime so wicked that they should be put to death by another individual? The death penalty or "capital
punishment" is defined as a government sanctioned practice where a person is sentenced to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. I oppose the
death penalty, it should be put to an end and terminated because the actual applications for the death penalty is random and capricious, the death
penalty violates the eighteenth amendment of the United States constitution, and even the guilty should have the right to life.
The Death Penalty and Similar Crimes
To begin with, the death penalty should be terminated because the actual applications for the death penalty is random, and capricious. In other words,
the death penalty system here in the United States is applied in an unfair manner. According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the death
penalty system is an unjust method against people because it is largely dependent on how much income and money the individual has, the intellectual
skills of their attorneys, the victim's race and or ethnicity and exactly where the crime took place. It is proven that people of color is executed more
compared to white people, more so if the victim is white. Innocent people are often executed by the state. Over one hundred and fifty–six

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty
After viewing the National Geographic documentary titled "Death Row Texas", I found myself grieving the loss of my father. Preceding my father's
death, he was an employee of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) working as a Correctional Officer at the Texas State Penitentiary at
Huntsville, known as the "Walls Unit". Over the years, some of the stories that my father shared with me regarding TDCJ unfair system has me
struggling with this question, particularly since TDCJ designed the system to oppress people of color through the act of mass incarceration, life in prison
, and the death sentence according to a news article published by the New Yorker titled, "The Caging of America". In the United States of America,
White Americans have been murdering innocent African–Americans for centuries without punishments for their crimes, and yet today this behavior
continues throughout our criminal justice system. According to the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, Texas alone has accounted for more
than 30% of the executions in the United States, and over the past five years, people of color make up 80% of the death sentences in Texas with more
than 60% of the death sentences imposed on African–Americans. In response to the question whether Willie Earl Pondexter Jr., Johnny Ray Johnson
and David Martinez deserve the death penalty, I am still undecided on my position due to my uncertainty regarding the usefulness in imposing the death
sentence. Furthermore,

Death Penalty The Death Penalty: killing people that kill people to show people that killing people is wrong. Use of the death penalty in the United
States has always been controversial. Some people believe that it is a fair system in which criminals pay for the crimes they committed and to prevent
future crimes. While others believe that it is a broken system, often punishing innocent civilians to a cruel and inhumane death.
Furthermore, the method in which the death penalty is executed is a clear violation of a human rights and is unconstitutional. The eighth amendment of
Constitution of United States of America states, "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments
inflicted." ("Amendment...show more content...
In fact, it is more expensive as compared to when containing the same criminal inside the prison for life. The costs involve the expenses acquired
before and during the trial. It involves a nonstop flow of legal wrangling, appeals and more. ("Death Penalty Pros and Cons.") Carrying out a single
death sentence for a criminal costs two to five times more than that putting that same criminal in prison for the rest of his or her life. This is due to the
costs, which include, but are not limited to, investigation costs, cost of processing evidence, substantial lawyer fees, amount of trials, number of
extensive appeals, substantial security costs, and incarceration costs. Prices also continue to rise after the criminal is sentenced to the death penalty,
because it costs more to house death row inmates, who are held in segregated sections, in individual cells, with guards delivering everything to them.
Thus, imprisoning criminals for life is tens of millions of dollars cheaper than to execute them. ("Pros & Cons: Death

Death Penalty Pros & Cons
Top 10 Pros and Cons
Should the death penalty be allowed?
The PRO and CON statements below give a five minute introduction to the death penalty debate.
(Read more information about our one star to five star Theoretical Credibility System)
1.Morality
2.Constitutionality
3.Deterrence
4.Retribution
5.Irrevocable Mistakes
6.Cost of Death vs. Life in Prison
7.Race
8.Income Level
9.Attorney Quality
10.Physicians at Execution
PRO Death PenaltyCON Death Penalty
1. Morality
PRO: "The crimes of rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, murder, larceny, and perjury pivot on a moral code that escapes apodictic [indisputably true]
proof by expert testimony or otherwise. But communities would plunge into anarchy if they could not...show more content...
Therefore, a life sentence must be less deterrent than a death sentence. And we must execute murderers as long as it is merely possible that their
execution protects citizens from future murder." CON: "[T]here is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long
terms of imprisonment. States that have death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws. And states that
have abolished capital punishment show no significant changes in either crime or murder rates. The death penalty has no deterrent effect. Claims that
each execution deters a certain number of murders have been thoroughly discredited by social science research."

4. Retribution
PRO: "Society is justly ordered when each person receives what is due to him. Crime disturbs this just order, for the criminal takes from people their
lives, peace, liberties, and worldly goods in order to give himself undeserved benefits. Deserved punishment protects society morally by restoring this
just order, making the wrongdoer pay a price equivalent to the harm he has done. This is retribution, not to be confused with revenge, which is guided
by a different motive. In retribution the spur is the virtue of indignation, which answers injury with injury for public good... Retribution is the primary
purpose of just punishment as such... [R]ehabilitation, protection, and deterrence

The United States justice system uses many methods of punishment on lawbreakers and criminals. These include jail time, community service, paroles,
fines, and the most shocking, the death penalty. The death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment, was first introduced in the form of hanging
hundreds of years ago when America was first established. Now, the most common way of execution proves to be death by lethal injection. For
hundreds of years, people have argued over whether or not the general idea of capital punishment stands morally correct. Many have also debated if
anyone holds the right to end another's life. The death penalty, morally wrong and faulty, does not save lives but unnecessarily ruins and ends them.
Everyone...show more content...
Ringo, who committed his crime July of 1998, was executed on September 10, 2014. Ringo, along with an accomplice, previously robbed a restaurant
and fatally shot Joanna Baysinger and Dennis Poyser. In his conclusion, Muhlhausen states the execution of Ringo "may just save the lives of several
innocents" (Muhlhausen). He fails to mention, however, exactly how this death prevented more. Ringo already spent about sixteen years in prison
without problems, so prison contained him his murderous ways just fine. Lives can be saved in absence of execution. The containment of criminals,
rather than the death of, still prevents innocents from losing their lives. Execution may prevent deaths just as well as jail time, but only with the heavy
cost of another human being's life. The nation of America divides when it comes to capital punishment. Just thirty–one of fifty states still use the death
penalty. Two years ago, August 13, the state of Connecticut ruled the death penalty unconstitutional. The court discussed the morality and the
discriminatory cases of capital punishment (Caplan). Race can be a big factor when it comes to capital punishment, as a minority is about six times
more likely to receive the death penalty than a white defendant. Many also argue against capital punishment because they feel the death penalty gives
criminals an easy way out. Death can be easier and quicker than a life sentence or community

The death penalty. What a controversial topic in itself. And that's not even getting into how those sentenced are executed, which is what I would like to
discuss– the form of execution. Specifically, death by firing squad. The pros, cons and why I believe it should be legal. Firstly, since 1976 only 3
inmates have been executed by firing squad opposed to the 1,227 executed by lethal injection in the United States. Why? It's simple. It's not legal, it is
deemed unconstitutional according to the eighth amendment which forbids cruel and unusual punishment. Although it is deemed unconstitutional
experts actually feel it may be the best form of execution. "Firing squad is the only execution method for which people are trained," says the Fordham
University law professor Deborah Denno, who studies lethal injection and other execution methods. "It's the most certain, the most expert way of
executing and from all we know it would be the quickest." There have been two documented firing squad executions that could be considered "messed
up" in a sense. One in 1879, when Wallace Wilkerson moved just enough for the executioners to miss his heart. Another happened in 1951 when the
executioners misfired and hit the inmate in the...show more content...
I personally find it quicker and more humane. "The death probably happens within seconds," says Dr. Jonathan Groner, a pediatric surgeon at The Ohio
State University who studies such things "There is no way to measure the pain, but there's anecdotal evidence that it's less painful." Dr. Groner tells us
about multiple lethal injections that happened this past year, including the executions assigned to Clayton Lockett of Oklahoma and Dennis McGuire
of Ohio, both of which caused prolonged deaths. During the execution all the witnesses described the inmates groaning and writhing on the execution
table. And personally this is not a way I would like to go, would

In the world we as people live in violence. Violence has gotten so out of control that it has affected everyone. The one thing about violence is that it
also leads to crimes. And crimes leads to some people being imprisoned, while others are put on death row. But if crimes are crimes, what makes
them minor or major? Who decides if they are minor or major? Nowadays minor and major crimes are being pushed together. For example, someone
gets shot and the shooter gets 5 years in prison. But if someone is raped it cannot be proven and the victim is left suicidal while the rapist goes about
their day. Both are major crimes but one has a sentence and the other one does not. With this happening in the world it makes me wonder if we as the
people...show more content...
30)." The community as a whole should already have what crime gets the death penalty. If it takes a lot of money to make sure that this particular
crime was committed by the right person then so be it. It should not matter whether it takes another month or so to be accurate with the crime
committed. Also Robinson adds "Some experts believe deciding to limit the death penalty will no longer make it a potential deterrent to criminals
(Robinson par. 24)." If the death penalty is restricted then there is no hope of it having an effect on the population a little as time passes. Robinsons
also wrote about how the death penalty should be used:
More discriminate use of the death penalty – reserving its use for only highly aggravated crimes, the 'worst of the worst' – will lessen the risk of flawed
convictions and sentences and ensure that those who really deserve to be on death row will be executed. [There shouldn't be restriction to the death
penalty because] ... the capital punishment system will remain flawed and it is more likely that less–deserving or innocent prisoners will be convicted
and put on death row. (Robinson par. 7)
In life there is always going to be something that is flawed with the death penalty. The reason being is because of human error. Human error happens a
lot and sometimes it

The Death Penalty The death penalty has become an extremely pressing issue in our culture today. Both sides of the argument make very valid points.
On one side the death penalty could potentially make citizens feel more safe, and on the other hand people can argue that us as mere humans do not
have the authority to "play God." I believe the death penalty should be abolished for a variety of reasons; our government is a broken system, a
proposed law would not end all murders, and we, as humans, should not have the authority to determine whether someone lives or dies. In the article "
Capital Punishment Should Be Temporarily Suspended" the author Russ Feingold talks about our corrupt government, and gives an example of a man
convicted of a crime...show more content...
He loves and cherishes His people, and because we bear His image He is a God of justice. When Jesus died on the cross He fulfilled the old law, or
the Old Testament; when his blood was shed it pardons us from a spiritual "death penalty." When reading the New Testament it is full of new
framework; rather than constant justice, there is grace and mercy. The New Testament calls out hypocrisy. For example, in John 8:2
–11 Jesus shows
His followers and disciples that we no longer need to condemn others for a sin that they are in, because we have not removed the plank in our own eye.
"At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. 3 The teachers of the
law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group 4 and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was
caught in the act of adultery. 5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?" 6 They were using this question as a
trap, in order to have a basis for accusing

Clayton GorskiDeath Penalty
The death penalty has been a debated topic for decades. Many people believe that it serves justice to the person being executed, while others think that
it does no good for either party. However, I believe the three most outstanding topics surround the death penalty are the cost of death vs. life inprison,
attorney quality, and irrevocable mistakes.
The first topic surrounding the death penalty is the cost of death vs. life in prison. This is a big issue because most people believe that the death
penalty is a more cost effective decision than spending life in prison, but that may have been the case many years ago when deaths were swift. Today,
prisoners have to go to...show more content...
What I consider to be a pro of the attorney quality is that state governments and courts are starting to recognize the flaws within the death penalty
system. A major con of attorney quality is that prisoners cannot afford their own attorneys, they are appointed one. Generally the attorneys that are
appointed to prisoners are newer attorneys with very little experience, or just bad attorneys. This most of the time leads to the defendants being
executed innocent or not.
The last topic surrounding the death penalty are the irrevocable mistakes made by judges. This has become a big issue within the last twenty years
because the number of appeal cases that found the defendant was innocent, and saved from the death penalty was enough to put the topic into review.
Pros of this is there has been a recognition to have higher standard for convicting someone of the death penalty. Another pro is that there have been
organizations like the innocence project to help victims convicted of crimes they haven't committed. These organizations also shed light on prisoners on
death row and in the regular prison population, to review their cases and come to a better sentence. With these reviews many people across the nation
have be set free, but without a deeper look into their cases they would most likely still be sitting in prison. A con of this is the fact that someone could
be sentenced to death that is innocent.

The Government used to have a death penalty where you would have to sit in a chair that shocks you all the way to your death. When time has
come passed the electric chair was eliminated and now their using the lethal injection where you are poisoned and killed instantly. Out of
everybody on the death row 42% are Black, 43% are Whites, 13% are Hispanic, and 2% are other races. In the US there was 3,035 people on death
row last October. 150 death row inmates were released due to their innocence being found. In Cali people who killed whites where 3 times more likely
to get the death row then those who killed blacks.In a proposal I read that the government was thinking about blind folding and shooting inmates on
death row because of technical...show more content...
The US remains the same company as Iran china and Iraq as the users of capital punishment. I don't think anyone's job description should be killing
another person that bleeds the same blood as you. Death penalty is lethal raffle. Out of 15000 to homicides every year in US, only about 120 people
are punished with death. That's less than 1% of the people in jail for murder. There has to be a better punishment that can take place for the inmate's
family than just putting an inmate to rest. The families of the murder victims go through trauma and the loss of a loved on. No one should have the
power to take someone from their family especially forever. But execution doesn't help the people redeem are end the pain that you all have caused.
The longed process regarding to executions extends the wait that the family waits to hear the bed news. The Families of the murder victim would be
better if the money being used now for the expensive process of execution were provided with counseling and assistant. Murder cases cost 1.5 million
are more. Paying for prosecution and defense makes the state and counties pay $9 million a year. The death penalty brings civilians lives to a

Essay on Death Penalty Pros and Cons
In this time of life, where things have changed to a better world, it still exist massacre, what it's called death penalty. "United Stated is one of the six
nations that commonly continue with this dramatic scenario" (Human Rights).Debates and political issues have been put into effect to stop this cruel
and inhuman punishment. Since early years people have the belief of killing each other to solve their problem; what's the idea of slaughter if pain
would not be applicable? We should keep them breathing to make them suffer the same way they cause the suffer ness of us or other people.
Its hard to see one of your family members get killed by one of this people, the first thing we want is to see them get killed, but if you stop and...show
more content...
People are not against the death penalty, they want to see people get killed for their mistakes; (APW wrote: DP another way) "I am wondering if any
of you who can support the death penalty, would be willing to push the buttons, or inject the poison to commit murder? They are murderers, and rapists
and the like, so they kill. We are Children of God; we haven't the right to kill another soul. That is in the hands of God alone. We have the
responsibility to keep these people away from others, and rehabilitate, if possible. That is all. Would any of you push that button?" It's hard to see us
pass the law of murder, why should we make the same mistake they did.
Many rapes, violations or other situation have been done by people that don't care of life of other or their life, do you think if putting him into the
death penalty he would care, it's only a quick pain, they would not care if getting killed. Their many ways to solve this problem for example:
rehabilitation or solitary confinement, if you think about it this is worse than death. Death is quick; solitary is for 1–80 years or more, with this as
well, no contact with the outside. It's like a living death in a world of pain and suffer ness, it would make them consider it twice before doing
something bad, just to think a life with nobody to talk, it would make them realize in what situation they got into, it would set a good example to all
the criminals. Violence

The death penalty, a constant source of controversy and divided opinion, is the punishment of death given to criminals who commit severe crimes. As
the severity of crimes that attract the death penalty is debatable, so is its correctness and effectiveness. The justice system is based upon punishment
for crimes committed with emphasis on the punishment fitting the crime. Countries such as China and Singapore have used it to punish drug
traffickers and therefore fuelled debate on how fitting the punishment is in such cases. For all it aims to achieve, the death penalty has well
documented weaknesses, not least of which is its brutality and finality, and it is these frailties that lead to the calls for its abolishment. The death
penalty is...show more content...
For the death sentence to be issued, numerous stages of a long process seek to verify the guilt of the accused. While these stages seek to rule out
reasonable doubt, common among these stages is human involvement and thus the likelihood of error that human beings are susceptible to. Not just
error though, opinions and perceptions of jurors come into play and this does little to ensure that the risk of an innocent person being sentenced to
death is alleviated. Despite the best efforts of pro–death penalty activists to overplay the role of modern methods such as DNA testing in evidence
validity (Joe Messerli balancedpolitics.org), it still does not rule out the chance of an innocent life being taken. Does what the death penalty aim to
achieve outweigh the choice to overlook risk of loss of innocent life? It would if the death penalty was the only way to achieve justice, but it is not.
Life imprisonment without parole is just as effective, but it is does not have the yoke of finality that the death penalty has since appeals could be made
in light of new evidence that could prove innocence.
One key argument brought up in support of the death penalty is that it offers retribution especially for murder cases. This argument was backed heavily
by New York law professor, Robert Blecker, who claimed that the punishment had to be painful in proportion to the crime. "It would be unfair that those

Most people in the United States believe we should have the death penalty. They believe that the death penalty keeps people from committing
crimes. Most of these people today think that people will get scared of being executed by gas or needle and that they won't commit real bad
crimes. A lot of other people believe that it is just plain wrong to kill someone and no one should be killed for any reason even murder and rape and
so they are against the death penalty. I will talk to you about these problems with the death penalty in my paper. Everyone should ask themselves what
they believe. Do you believe that by killing people using the death it will save lives. The death penalty is called capital punishment. You get sentenced
with...show more content...
Even if you don't believe in the death penalty, the United States does have it. There are many reasons people have for being against it. The
American Civil Liberties Union is a organization that fights against the death penalty. They don't believe that the death penalty should be used at all.
They have been trying for years and years to get rid of the death penalty. Some of the things the ACLU does is they will be the attorney for some
people if they are sentenced with the death penalty. They go around the country and the world trying to end the death penalty everywhere.I remember
all the news stories about people being put in the prison for the wrong reason so that is some of the reasons people don't like it.
Summary
Everyone has to decide for themselves if they believe in the death penalty or not. You can't just use one person's opinon. You have to look at it for
yourself and decide what you believe. Death penalty is not the right way to do things all the time because it can be not fair and people may do some
bad things but that doesn't mean they have to die for the things they have done and I think a lot of people should agree with me. Since the bible times
people have been killed for doing many different things. There are many states that still use the death penalty or capital punishment and there are many
states who don't. Texas is a state that is very hard on criminals. The killed more people with the death penalty than

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty Essay