2. Purpose of the paper
• Defining student expression and student journalist privileges
• Identifying how student’s First Amendment rights have evolved
over the years
• Understand what student journalists can expect in the future
3. Historical First Amendment presence on
campus
• Public school and universities have been held to the same
standard as other state-operated institutions
• West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) marked
a divergence in public school/university roles
• Kozlowski (2018) writes about how the Supreme Court clarified
fuller extension of First Amendment rights with Tinker
4. Case law
• Two cases have had particular significance throughout the past
several decades
• Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
(1969) effectively extended more complete First Amendment
rights to students of public school and universities
• Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) essentially ruled
that high school student publications that are part of curriculum
or rely heavily on administration can subject to stricter
censorship.
• Hosty v. Carter ruled that Hazelwood set framework for how
college student publications should be handled
5. Law review analysis
• Student journalists are trapped in a legal gray area. Hu (2015)
writes about an incident where student journalists did professional
work but lacked legal protections
• Despite the unclear protections of student journalists, Buller
(2013) identifies two main categories states fall into when
determining student journalist privileges
• Pittman (2007) addresses how Hosty v. Carter failed to protect
expression on college campuses, and what he would like to change
in the future
6. Conclusions
• Student journalism is fading into obscurity—both in legality and
purpose
• Student expression is still protected through First Amendment
rights, but not in institutionalized student media outlets
• In the future, it could useful to explore if public distrust of the
media is impacting rights of student journalists