2. Page 1 of 6
03/22/15 EMAIL TO PAM QUICK/TEMPSTAFF & MS U.S. CONGRESSMAN
BENNIE THOMPSON
RE: MATTER OF PUBLIC POLICY/INTEREST: Filing Of EEOC Charge
AGAINST First Heritage Credit LLC and Merchants FoodService Issue
FROM: DENISE NEWSOME
Pam/TempStaff:
In that it is a matter of PUBLIC Record as well as PUBLIC Interest, you/TempStaff
may or may not know that on MONDAY, 02/09/15, I went to file an EEOC Charge
against First Heritage Credit; however, encountered problems (i.e. EEOC alleging their
computer system was down) which prevented the filing of Charge. I was asked to
return. Therefore, on FRIDAY, 02/13/15, I returned to file the EEOC Charge against
First Heritage Credit. Pam/TempStaff may recall, 02/13/15 was the date in my
previous WEDNESDAY, 03/11/15 email entitled, “TRANSPORTATION CLERK
POSITION - PAY RATE CONCERNS” sent about 8:41 p.m. that I
advised of my conversation with JD and her sharing with me Merchants FoodService’s
(MFS) EXECUTIVE Decision regarding her employment and other things.
On FRIDAY, 02/20/15, the EEOC executed a “Dismissal and Notice of Right” advising
me that my 02/09/15 Charge that could not be filed because of their system being
down and received on 02/13/15 was “UNTIMELY” filed. However, it was NOT – i.e.
good faith being made to file it in 180 days or 300 days for ONGOING
Discriminatory practices which are addressed in my 02/09/15 EEOC Charge.
On FRIDAY, 02/27/15, I returned to the EEOC to address this FRIVOLOUS
dismissal at which time, I was advised that the EEOC’s Area Director Wilma Jones
Scott advised me to submit a “WRITTEN” request to have the Charge REOPENED!
On I returned to the EEOC and filed document entitled,MONDAY, 03/02/15,
“Request To Reopen Case and Request To Be Advised Of Conflict Of Interest.”
On FRIDAY, 03/06/15, it appears that Merchants FoodService IN RETALIATION to
the filing of my 03/02/15 pleading, ABRUPTLY ENDED JD’s employment.
ORIGINALLY, JD’s last day was supposed to be TUESDAY, 03/31/15!
Also, on FRIDAY, 03/06/15, you/TempStaff may recall, I was advised by Merchants
FoodService’s HR Representative (Jan Harkett [sp?]) that it was my last day to be
working in the Customer Service Department and that I was being moved to the
Transportation Department – i.e. it appears based on LIES and for

3. Page 2 of 6
DISCRIMINATORY/RETALIATORY purposes for my engagement in PROTECTED
activities (filing of EEOC Charge). It is NOT the first time that those (the Law Firm
of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and those with whom they
conspire) who are DETERMINED to DESTROY my LIVELIHOOD (means of income
and etc.) have STOOPED to such levels and CONTACTED myemployment,
employers (as Merchants FoodService – YES, under the EEOC GUIDELINES, MFS
is considered my employer) for purposes of getting me TERMINATED as done
with MFS! It appears that employers as MFS relies on employment agencies as
TempStaff to SHIELD them from LIABILITY; however, there will be NO SHIELDING.
Thanks to my 02/13/15 conversation with JD, other information I was able to
obtain from that conversation, and THEN the BLATANT NEXUS between the ABUPT
ending of JD’s employment and then mine approximately FIVE (5) DAYS LATER (when
there were JOB VACANCIES for which I qualified available) that this is
relevant/pertinent information. Thank goodness I CONTESTED and/or MADE
KNOWN my OPPOSITION to the Transportation Department move! Thank goodness
that the PROFFERED/PRETEXT reason for TERMINATION of my employment
with MFS you/TempStaff GAVE ME via VOICEMAIL on 03/11/15 and that on
03/12/15, are NOT consistent and are based on LIES that CANNOT be
substantiated by MFS!
PLEASE BE ADVISED: As you/TempStaff know, I have NOT been sent on an
assignment since MONDAY, 03/16/15. Pam/TempStaff advising me that it could be a
lease THREE (3) WEEKS! While I shared in my TUESDAY, 03/17/15, email the
following vacancies:
EXECUTIVE ADMIN ASST (Jackson) - Job ID: 00004VK7
MEDICAL OFFICE CLERK/FLOATER (Jackson) - Job ID: 00004VH0
RECEPTIONIST/ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (Jackson) - Job
ID: 00004VM5
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (Madison) - Job ID: 00004TY7
RECEPTIONIST (Raymond) - Job ID: 00004VN7
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (Ridgeland) - Job ID: 00004V7L
I saw POSTED ONLINE by TempStaff and your/TempStaff sharing with me what was
going on with each and the submitting of my Resume to three of them. Let me say
(based on conversations I have had with other TempStaff Employees) that I am
AWARE that TempStaff have job VACANCIES and ASSIGNMENTS that do NOT
require submittal of Resumes PRIOR to being sent on an assignment!
PLEASE BE ADVISED: That through the EEOC Charge filed against First
Heritage Credit, I am requesting that the COMMISSION look into FHC’s use of what I
believe to be an UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL “ANTI-TITLE VII” Disclosure Statement that

4. Page 3 of 6
I am seeing being used not only by FHC but other employers and employment
agencies. A copy of FHC’s “DISCLOSURE REGARDING BACKGROUND
INVESTIGATION” is attached. Use of such Disclosure Statement is PROHIBITED
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964! I believe I KNOW who (Baker
Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) has been BEHIND the CREATION and
IMPLEMENTATION of such UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL Disclosure Statements and WHY
– i.e. based on the WORDING!
PLEASE BE ADVISED: That due to the SYSTEMATIC DISCRIMINATORY
practices that appears have been leveled against me and involve matters of
HOMELAND SECURITY (i.e. an AGENCY CREATED by the Law Firm Baker
Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) I have NOTIFIED Mississippi’s United
States Congressman Bennie Thompson of such matters.
I believe that Mississippi Congressman Bennie Thompson may have at his
disposal the proper JURISDICTION to ACCESS employer RECORDS as well

5. Page 4 of 6
as address DISCRIMINATORY/RETALIATORY practices of the EEOC and
those who CONSPIRE with it for purposes of IMPLEMENTING ANTI-TITLE
VII criminal/civil violations!
U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S.Ct. 819
(2003) - Essence of a conspiracy is an
agreement to commit an unlawful act.
Agreement to commit an
unlawful act, which constitutes the
essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct
evil that may exist and be punished
whether or not the substantive crime
ensues. Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to
the public over and above the threat
of the commission of the relevant
substantive crime, both because the
combination in crime makes more
likely the commission of other crimes
and because it decreases the
probability that the individuals
involved will depart from their path
of criminality. Id.
It appears that due to the FAILURE to act CRIMINAL LAW FIRMS as Baker Donelson
Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz use their POWER/INFLUENCE for purposes of
ENGAGING in further CRIMES and using the JUDICIAL PROCESS (Courts,
PRIVATE/SECRET Grand Jury(s), etc.) to further their RACIST/DISCRIMINATORY
practices against myself as well as OTHER Black/African-Americans and people as JD
(White) who will NOT and/or are NOT willing to ENGAGE them in EEO violations!
YES, JD is protected under Title VII – she may not know it; however, she IS!
I believe it is also IMPORTANT for Congressman Thompson to see HOW l – African-
American/EDUCATED (B.S. Degree)/Excellent Computer Skills/EXPERIENCE – have
NOT been able to get employment when clearly it appears there are jobs available – i.e.
NOW the OBSTRUCTING of EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES due to the
ANTI-TITLE VII Disclosure Statement(s) that are unlawfully/illegally being
IMPLEMENTED! Now because of PUBLIC INTERESTS and a HOMELAND
SECURITY issue(s) – i.e. with Black/African-American BUSINESSES, BANKS, JOBS,
etc. being DESTROYED by the United States Government through ILLEGAL RAIDS,
etc. – there are HIGH STATISTICS among this PROTECTED group of being
UNemployed and NOW their CHILDREN are being GUNNED DOWN and/or BEATEN
in the streets by Law Enforcement! BRINGING TO THE LIGHT what so many have
KNOWN but just didn’t have the FACTS/EVIDENCE or didn’t KNOW that the LAWS
PROTECTED them from such RACIST/DISCRIMINATORY practices as that of First

6. Page 5 of 6
Heritage Credit and Merchants FoodService! Coming AFTER jobs for PURPOSES of
OBSTRUCTING EEOC Investigations and/or attempts to provide the likes of First
Heritage Credit and Merchants FoodService with an
UNDUE/UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL advantage is UNACCEPTABLE! I just believe that if
these past employers of mine believed they had VALID grounds OUTSIDE of TITLE VII,
they would not have had to engage in the CRIMINAL/CIVIL violations made KNOWN to
me!
The United States Constitution as well as
laws passed by the United States Congress
will further support the need for the passing
of House Report No. 92-238. Congress
demonstrated its awareness that claimants
might not be able to take advantage of the
federal remedy without appointment of
counsel. As explained in House Report No.
92-238:
By including this provision in
the bill, the committee
emphasizes that the nature of .
. .actions more often than not
pits parties of unequal strength
and resources against each
other. The complainant, who
is usually a member of the
disadvantaged class, is
opposed by an employer who .
. . has at his disposal a vast
of resources and legal talent.
H.R. Rep. No. 238, 92nd Cong., 2d Sess.,
reprinted in 1972 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2137, 2148.

7. Page 6 of 6
Pam/TempStaff, thank you for your time and consideration regarding the above issues
addressed.
Sincerely,
Denise Newsome
P.O. Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
(601) 885-8145
cc: Mississippi U.S. Congressman Bennie Thompson (via email & Facsimile)