Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

11/02/19 REMINDER OF 110419 PRETRIAL HEARING REMINDER (Michael Miller EL)

205 views

Published on

17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE

COURT LACKS JURISDICTION

REMINDER: PRETRIAL HEARING – MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2019 – 10:00 A.M.

11/01/19 Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals…
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18

Published in: News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

11/02/19 REMINDER OF 110419 PRETRIAL HEARING REMINDER (Michael Miller EL)

  1. 1. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE COURT LACKS JURISDICTION REMINDER: PRETRIAL HEARING – MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2019 – 10:00 A.M. 11/01/19 Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals… CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE: OTP-CR-367/18
  2. 2. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 1 of 5 c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome Post Office Box 31265 - Jackson, Mississippi 39286 Toll Free - (888) 700-5056 Phone: (601) 885-3324 Website: www.uticainternationalembassy.website Email: interimpm@uticainternationalembassy.website November 2, 2019 1 TO: VIA EMAIL: International Criminal Court/The Office Of The Prosecutor – c/o Mark P. Dillon (Head of Information & Evidence Unit) - otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int Fadi El Abdallah/Spokesperson Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc- cpi.int ICC Public Affairs - PublicAffairs.Unit@icc-cpi.int VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (202) 514-9769 and/or (202) 514-8844 Office Of The Solicitor General United States Department of Justice c/o Noel Francisco – Noel.Francisco@usdoj.gov 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW #5143 Washington, DC 20530 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (216) 698-2270 Cuyahoga County Office of the Prosecutor ATTN: Michael C. O’Malley – mcomalley@prosecutor.cuyahogacounty.us The Justice Center –9thFloor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 VIA EMAIL AND/OR FACSIMILE: (202) 514-05632 United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel ATTN: William Pelham Barr– US Attorney General c/o Melissa Golden (*) - usdoj- officeoflegalcounsel@usdoj.gov Room 5511, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20530-0001 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (212) 692-2498 Permanent Mission of South Africa to the United Nations ATTN: Ambassador Jerry Matthews Matjila Matjila@dirco.gov.za 333 E 38th Street New York, NY 10016 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (202) 225-8259 U.S. House Of Representatives ATTN: Nancy Pelosi – Speaker Of The House c/o Patti Ross – pattie.ross@mail.house.gov3 1236 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (410) 243-4095 Moorish Science Temple of America: The Asiatic Nation of North America c/o Hakim Elamenu-El, ALLI – Executive Ruler hakimelamenuel@yahoo.com 1050 East 33rd Street – Suite 206 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (202) 225-8259 U.S. House Of Representatives ATTN: Ilhan Omar - Congresswoman c/o Kelly Misselwitz – kelly.misselwitz@mail.house.gov 1517 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 FOREIGN NATIONS/LEADERS and the PUBLIC/WORLD-AT-LARGE 1 Boldface, Caps, Small Caps, Italics, and Underline, etc. are used for EMPHASIS! 2 (*) This Fax/Document is for DELIVERY to the person(s) that is addressed at “ATTN” – i.e. THROUGH Inter-Office Mail Services, etc. 3 PLEASE NOTE: Links/Internet Links provided and the documents/information contained therein as well as the Pictures and the information contained in them, are herein incorporated by reference as if set forth in full within this instant document. Information contained herein is based on Personal Knowledge, Research, Investigations, Interviews, Beliefs, etc. and at times have been cut and pasted for usage, etc.
  3. 3. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE 2 of 5 RE: REMINDER: PRETRIAL HEARING – MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2019 – 10:00 A.M. 11/01/19 Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals… CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE: OTP-CR-367/18 Greetings! We come to each of you in Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom and Justice! Please find a copy of the document that we sought to have filed with the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas (Ohio) entitled, “Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals…” which may be found at the following LINK in regards to the above referenced matter: https://issuu.com/vogeldenise/docs/110119_michael_millerel__pretrial_ We have been advised that Michael Anthony Miller-EL’s Mother’s LIFE has been THREATENED should she seek to have document(s) filed on her son’s behalf! Please be advised that we want to make it VERY CLEAR that such THREATS on our Mothers’, Elders’, Seniors’, Citizens’, etc. LIVES, are UNACCEPTABLE and will not be tolerated by our Governments and hopefully not by the International Communities and Tribunals! Therefore, we believe that this is a matter of URGENCY and we are bringing it to the attention of the International Criminal Court, United Nations/United Nations Security Council, United States of America’s Solicitor General, United States Congress and other Foreign Nations! We believe that the evidence provided in our Brother Michael Anthony Miller-EL’s November 1, 2019, Court document (that is being obstructed from being filed in anticipation of the Monday, November 4, 2019, Pretrial Hearing set for 10:00 a.m.) is sufficient to address the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas’ LACK OF JURISDICTION to address this matter as well as said Court’s, its County’s and the United States of America’s Despotism Government Officials and their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz’ and CO-Conspirators further engagement in War Crimes and other Criminal Acts! We wanted it CLEARLY noted of said Court’s Officials’ engagement in Fraud Upon The Court, Kidnapping, False Imprisonment, Intimidation, Threats, Telecommunication Harassment, Mail Fraud, and a series of other felonious acts and War Crimes clearly evidenced and carried out through a Summons alleged to have been issued on a Strawman (MICHAEL MILLER-EL) in Macon, Georgia through a Carrier Service (Federal Express) although said Court’s alleged, “Issue Warrant for Named Defendant” clearly states the following: Name Miller-El, Michael Address 1730 Lonna Dr – NW Roanoke, VA 24019
  4. 4. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 3 of 5 so, “WHY” is this Court’s alleged Summons (which is NOT reflected for viewing) being issued to a Defendant in Macon, Georgia and then the “Issue Warrant for Named Defendant” being issued to a Defendant who has a similar name as our Brother Michael Anthony Miller-EL in Roanoke, VA? With that being said, the record evidence clearly supports War Crimes and other Criminal Acts from the onset of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas’ Officials, Cuyahoga County Officials and their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and CO-Conspirators!
  5. 5. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE 4 of 5 We rightfully and respectfully demand the IMMEDIATE RELEASE of our Brother Michael Anthony Miller-EL as it has been brought to our attention (via his Son and Daughter) of his being subjected to Torture Techniques – i.e. as we advised through our previous correspondence as that of October 18, 2019: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101819-letter-uieicc-michael-miller-mattersrevised https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/investigations/county-jail/sheriff-pinkney-refuses-to- answer-dozens-of-questions-about-county-jail-during-council-meeting and other War Crimes, etc. as that presently being Investigated by the International Criminal Court in its “Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan” As of 10/24/19: https://www.icc-cpi.int//Pages/item.aspx?name=ma244 matter in which the United States of America has been vehemently contesting in fear of International Prosecution! For those who may not know, our Brother was KIDNAPPED from Roanoke, Virginia and transported over State Lines and/or Territories (via USA Slave Trade Trafficking, etc.) to Cuyahoga County, Ohio! War Crimes which our records and the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas’ records support have been reported by him! Furthermore, according to News Reports, said County is presently under Investigation; however, it is important to note that there are Conflict-Of-Interests present As of 10/17/19: https://vimeo.com/317716020 which clearly PROHIBITS the United States of America’s Despotism Government Empire from handling! Thus, most URGENTLY requiring the intervention of the International Community(s) and Tribunals for the safety and freedom of our Brother Michael Anthony Miller-EL. Record evidence will support we seek and have done so in a TIMELY manner - through duly mandatory notifications to the United States of America’s Despotism Government’s Officials with the duty and obligation to report these actions to the United Nations and/or International Tribunals; however, have made a conscious decision not to so! Thank each of you in advance for assisting us in our GOOD-FAITH efforts to bring about a PEACEFUL Resolution regarding the above referenced matters. We reserve the right to amend this instant Correspondence should it be deemed necessary! Furthermore, we hope that this correspondence will serve as further evidence of the “STATE OF EMERGENCY,” etc. that protected National/Foreign Citizens and Immigrants are being subjected to by the United States of America’s Despotism Government’s War Crimes… Enforcers, their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and their CO- Conspirators!
  6. 6. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 5 of 5 Should either of you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (888) 700-5056 and (601) 885-3324. Respectfully Submitted, Utica International Embassy c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome Post Office Box 31265 Jackson, Mississippi 39286 (888) 700-5056 or (601) 885-3324 Email: interimpm@uticainternationalembassy.website Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF AMERICA: THE ASIATIC NATION OF NORTH AMERICA c/o Hakim Elamenu-El, ALLI – Executive Ruler hakimelamenuel@yahoo.com 1050 East 33rd Street – Suite 206 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 Phone: (443) 721-8411
  7. 7. Page 1 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO1 THE STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff MICHAEL MILLER-EL Strawman Defendant * * * * * * * * * Case No. CR-19-641058-A Judge: REEVE KELSEY INDICTMENTS: 2921.03 INTIMIDATION 2921.05 RETALIATION 2917.21 TELECOMMUNICATION HARASSMENT PRETRIAL AND SUBSEQUENT MATTERS NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION/ NOTICE TO CEASE and DESIST/ MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE/ MOTION OF ARREST OF JUDGMENT/ Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals… PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Michael Anthony Miller-EL (a/k/a Michael Miller-EL and/or Miller- EL) WITHOUT waiving the lack of Jurisdictional defenses of this Court states the following: I. NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: 1. This Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals… (hereinafter, “NOLOJ”) is submitted in Love, Truth, Peace for the purpose of obtaining Miller-EL’s Freedom and to see that Justice take its course! 2. This instant NOLOJ is submitted in good faith and is not submitted for purposes of delay, harassment, hindering proceedings, embarrassment, obstructing the administration of justice, vexatious litigation, increasing the cost of litigation, etc. and is filed to protect and preserve the protected rights of Miller-EL guaranteed and/or secured under National and/or International Laws governing said matters. 3. This instant NOLOJ has been drafted in compliance with the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure (“ORCRP”) and other applicable Statutes/Laws governing said matters keeping in mind to aid the fact-finder and in effort of eliminating needless delay, unnecessary expenses and all other impediments 1 Boldface, Caps, Small Caps, Italics, and Underline, etc. are used for EMPHASIS!
  8. 8. Page 2 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page to the expeditious administration of justice. For instance, pursuant to Rule 1 of the ORCRP which states in part and is incorporated herein by reference: RULE 1. Scope of Rules: Applicability; Construction; Exceptions (B) Purpose and construction. These rules are intended to provide for the just determination of every criminal proceeding. They shall be construed and applied to secure the fair, impartial, speedy, and sure administration of justice, simplicity in procedure, and the elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay. 4. According to this Court’s Docket Entry (as of 10/31/19) in this instant matter, on or about June 20, 2019, this Court issued a “SUMMONS – CRIMINAL (39005972)” by Federal Express to “MILLER-EL/MICHAEL/647 HIGHTOWER ROAD MACON, GA 312060000” with knowledge that service was being made to the wrong address! (Emphasis added) 5. On or about 06/20/19, this Court did knowingly issue a Summons to a wrong address other than the address provided on its “Issue Warrant for Named Defendant” which provides an address of:
  9. 9. Page 3 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 1730 Lonna Dr – NW Roanoke, VA 24019 6. This Court’s issuance of a Summons (emphasis added) to a frivolous and/or wrong address was done with willful and malicious intent and other reasons known to this Court to deprive Miller-EL of due process, equal protection of the Laws, etc. pursuant to National and/or International Laws governing said matters. 7. Pursuant to Rule 4 (C)(2), of the ORCRP, it states in part: RULE 4. Warrant or Summons; Arrest (C) Warrant and summons: form. (2) Summons. The summons shall be in the same form as the warrant, except that it shall not command that the defendant be arrested, but shall order the defendant to appear at a stated time and place and inform the defendant that he or she may be arrested if he or she fails to appear at the time and place stated in the summons. A copy of the complaint shall be attached to the summons….
  10. 10. Page 4 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page However, the record of this Court is void of the “mandatory” documents required pursuant to the ORCRP to bring allege Defendants (as Miller-EL) before it. Moreover, for the purpose of providing a “safe haven” for making “it easier for pro se litigants” in pursuit of justice to be aware of the required forms in the prosecution of matters before the Court. For instance, pro se litigants can refer to the Appendix provided in the ORCRP as of 10/31/19, that may be found at the Supreme Court of Ohio’s website at: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/criminal/CriminalProcedure.pdf to determine whether the Court issued the following mandatory documents – i.e. which are absent in this instant matter – to bring allege Defendants before said Court as: (a) A Complaint setting forth Formal Charges based on the allege Grand Jury Indictments by the Prosecutor with supporting Affidavit(s) is absent from the record in this matter: (b) The Prosecutor’s “Request for Issuance of Summons Upon Complaint,” etc. is absent from this Court’s records regarding this instant matter:
  11. 11. Page 5 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page (c) The “Summons Upon/Complaint/Indictment” from the Judge, etc. is absent from this Court’s records regarding this instant matter as provided in the Appendix at “Form VI Summons upon complaint, indictment, or information.”
  12. 12. Page 6 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page (d) The Clerk’s Instructions for Carrier Service via Express Mail (i.e. as Federal Express, etc.) pursuant to Rule 4 of the ORCRP, Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure (“ORCP”) and/or the governing statutes/rules is absent from the record of this Court in this instant matter. RULE 4. Warrant or Summons; Arrest (D) Warrant and summons: execution or service; return. (3) Manner. . . . Summons may be served upon a defendant who is an individual by delivering a copy to the defendant personally, or by leaving it at the defendant’s usual place of residence with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein, or, except when the summons is issued in lieu of executing a warrant by arrest, by mailing it to the defendant's last known address by… express mail with a return receipt requested or by commercial carrier service utilizing any form of delivery requiring a signed receipt.… When service of summons is made by a commercial carrier service, it shall be served in the manner prescribed by Civ. R. 4.1(A)(1)(b). . . . RULE 4.1 Process: Methods of Service (A) Service by clerk. (1) Methods of service. (b) Service by commercial carrier service. Unless the serving party furnishes written instructions to the clerk that service be made pursuant to Civ.R. 4.1(A)(1)(a), the clerk may make service of any process by a commercial carrier service utilizing any form of delivery requiring a signed receipt. The clerk shall deliver a copy of the process and complaint or other document to be served to a commercial carrier service for delivery at the address set forth in the caption or at the address set forth in written instructions furnished to the clerk, with instructions to the carrier to return a signed receipt showing to whom delivered, date of delivery, and address where delivered.
  13. 13. Page 7 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page (e) Pursuant to Rule 4 of the ORCRP, the “Receipt of Summons by Serving Authority” – i.e. Federal Express – alleged to have been used by the Clerk of this Court is absent from the record of this Court. (f) Pursuant to Rule 4 of the ORCRP, the mandatory “Return of Service of Summons” is absent from the record of this Court. RULE 4. Warrant or Summons; Arrest (D) Warrant and summons: execution or service; return. (4) Return. The officer executing a warrant shall make return of the warrant to the issuing court before whom the defendant is brought pursuant to Crim.R. 5. At the request of the prosecuting attorney, any unexecuted warrant shall be returned to the issuing court and canceled by a judge of that court.
  14. 14. Page 8 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page When the copy of the summons has been served by delivering a copy to the defendant personally or by leaving it at the defendant’s usual place of residence with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein, the person serving summons shall endorse that fact on the summons and return it to the clerk, who shall make the appropriate entry on the appearance docket. When the copy of the summons has been served by mailing it to the defendant’s last known address by… by a commercial carrier service utilizing any form of delivery requiring a signed receipt, it shall be docketed and returned in the manner prescribed by Civ.R. 4.1(A)(2). RULE 4.1 Process: Methods of Service (A) Service by clerk. (2) Docket entries; Return. The clerk shall forthwith enter on the appearance docket the fact of delivery to… to a specified commercial carrier service for delivery, and make a similar entry when the return receipt is received. If the return shows failure of delivery, the clerk shall forthwith notify the… the party at whose instance process was issued and enter the fact and method of notification on the appearance docket. The clerk shall file the return receipt or returned envelope in the records of the action. When the person attempting to serve summons by delivering a copy to the defendant personally or by leaving it at the defendant’s usual place of residence with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein is unable to serve a copy of the summons within twenty-eight days of the date of issuance, the person serving summons shall endorse that fact and the reasons for the failure of service on the summons and return the summons and copies to the clerk, who shall make the appropriate entry on the appearance docket. If the return of service of a copy of the summons attempted to be served by… a commercial carrier service utilizing any form of delivery requiring a signed receipt shows failure of delivery, the clerk shall file the return receipt or returned envelope in the records of the case.
  15. 15. Page 9 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page At the request of the prosecuting attorney, made while the complaint is pending, …or a summons returned unserved, …may be delivered by the court to an authorized officer for execution or service. (g) Rule 4(C)(2) of the ORCP is clear that when a Summons is issued (as alleged in this matter), an arrest is prohibited and/or unwarranted; moreover, when this Court received notification of failed service, the Clerk of the Court was to notify Defendant (allege to be Miller-EL) and enter into the record of this Court of so doing; however, said information is absent from the record of this Court regarding this instant matter. RULE 4. Warrant or Summons; Arrest (C) Warrant and summons: form. (2) Summons. The summons shall be in the same form as the warrant, except that it shall not command that the defendant be arrested, but shall order the defendant to appear at a stated time and place and inform the defendant that he or she may be arrested if he or she fails to appear at the time and place stated in the summons. A copy of the complaint shall be attached to the summons… 8. On or about June 20, 2019 (according to Docket Entry), this Court issued a Summons. 9. Pursuant to Rule 9 of the ORCP, the Process Server will have 28 days to serve the Summons and Complaint. Likewise, upon receipt of service, the Defendant may have 28 days to respond. RULE 9. Warrant or Summons Upon Indictment... (C) Execution or service; return. (2) Return. The officer executing a warrant shall make return thereof to the court.
  16. 16. Page 10 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page When the person serving summons is unable to serve a copy of the summons within twenty-eight days of the date of issuance, he shall endorse that fact and the reasons therefor on the summons and return the summons, and copies to the clerk, who shall make the appropriate entry on the appearance docket. 10. On or about June 20, 2019, from the Docket Entry of this Court, an Arraignment Hearing was set for July 5, 2019 – i.e. approximately 15 days after issuance – to an Out-Of-State Defendant alleged (according to address provided on the “Issue Warrant for Named Defendant.” 11. On or about June 20, 2019, from the Docket Entry of this Court, an “ORP – Warrant On Indictment Issued.” 12. On or about June 21, 2019, from the Docket Entry of this Court, “CAPIAS SENT TO SHERIFF.” While it is not clear to Miller-EL what the Capias is for – i.e. there is nothing in the record of this Court to support filings and service notifying of any allege lawful and/or legal action by this Court against him. 13. On or about July 3, 2019, approximately 15 days from the issuance of the Summons on an Out-Of-State alleged Defendant and according to the Docket Entry of this Court, a “LETTER OF APPREHENSION SENT TO ROANOKE POLICE DEPT IN ROANOKE, VA” – i.e. not the Macon, Georgia Police Department but Roanoke. Therefore, a reasonable mind may conclude that this Court and its Clerk’s Office having knowledge from the June 21, 2019, Docket Entry filing its “Issue Warrant for Named Defendant” that said act was done with willful, malicious, fraudulent and criminal intent, etc. to cause injury harm to the alleged Defendant (Miller-EL)! 14. On or about July 9, 2019, approximately 19 days from issuance of Summons, there is a Docket Entry alleging, “FX RECEIPT NO. 39005972 RETURNED 6/26/2019 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON PARTY MILLER-EL/MICHAEL/ - BAD ADDRESS AFTER 8 DAYS - ” alleging a return date of about June 26, 2019; however, no such entry is made and neither is there an entry in the Docket of this Court to support that the Clerk of this Court made good-faith efforts to notify the alleged Defendant in this matter as mandatorily required to put party(s) on notice of any such Court/County action being taken! It is not clear to Miller-EL the significance of the “after 8 days” in that according to Rule 9 of the ORCRP regarding “Warrant or Summons Upon Indictment…,” the Process Server and/or Service of Process affords 28 days to perfect Service – i.e. which was not! Therefore, this Court lacks Jurisdiction which has not been waived! Instead this Court elected to send a “Letter of Apprehension” to the Roanoke Police Department and deprive allege Defendant in this matter due process, equal protection of the laws, etc. in accordance with National and/or International Laws governing said matters! 15. On or about July 23, 2019, there is a Docket Entry for, “SENT DETAINER TO ROANOKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE IN ROANOKE, VA.” Thus, further supporting that this Court and its Clerk of the Court having knowledge in the issuance of the 06/20/19 Summons only (i.e. without mention of Complaint) to a false address in Macon, Georgia was for purposes of committing fraud upon this Court and for purposes of furthering War Crimes and other Criminal acts that are being carried out against Michael Anthony Miller-EL in retaliation to his reporting of Criminal Acts to of Officials of this Court and County, etc. As a matter of law, Miller-EL is entitled to evidence (as said Detainer issued on the Roanoke County Sheriff’s Office in Roanoke, VA) for his records!
  17. 17. Page 11 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 16. The importance and/or critical nature for the mandatory recordings of when Summons is served on Defendant is to allow the Clerk of Court to set a date (i.e. for instance 28 days from the Defendant’s receipt of service). However, it is obvious from the War Crimes and Criminal Acts being carried out that the United Stated of America’s (“USA”) Legal Counsel (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) and other Members of the Confederate States of America, Ku Klux Klan, White Supremacist Groups and the Zionists want to make a Slave and example of Michael Anthony Miller-EL for exposing their War Crimes and Criminal Acts! 17. The record evidence and “LABELLING” Miller-EL is in keeping with the compromising of the United States of America’s Constitution, “BLACK Code” Laws, etc. which the USA has been operating under for quite some time in its Officials/Representatives/Lawyers’ quest to strip members of protected groups of their freedoms, nationality, sovereignty, and independence, etc. 18. The USA Officials/Representative/Lawyers’ fear of the truth getting out due to the fact that said truth would adversely impact the USA’s Economics and Commerce, etc. – i.e. especially the Slavery Empire that they have been masking through such MASS Incarcerations for frivolous Crimes as that to which Michael Anthony Miller-EL is being subjected to. II. MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE WITHOUT waiving the lack of Jurisdictional defenses of this Court, Michael Anthony Miller-EL (through this Motion for Production of Evidence) pursuant to Rule 12 of the ORCRP further demand that the State of Ohio and this Court provide him with “ALL” documents noted to have been filed and issued according to the Docket Entries in this instant matter – i.e. to include those that do not have icon to view documents online and/or download. Said Rule which states in part: RULE 12. Pleadings and Motions Before Trial: Defenses and Objections (C) Pretrial motions. Prior to trial, any party may raise by motion any defense, objection, evidentiary issue, or request that is capable of determination without the trial of the general issue. The following must be raised before trial: (1) Defenses and objections based on defects in the institution of the prosecution; (2) Defenses and objections based on defects in the indictment, information, or complaint (other than failure to show jurisdiction in the court or to charge an offense, which objections shall be noticed by the court at any time during the pendency of the proceeding);
  18. 18. Page 12 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page (3) Motions to suppress evidence, including but not limited to statements and identification testimony, on the ground that it was illegally obtained. Such motions shall be filed in the trial court only. (5) Requests for severance of charges or defendants under Crim. R. 14. and further state: 19. The evidence requested to be produce is that capable of determination without a trial in that is allege evidence according to Docket Entry. 20. His objections to this Court abuse of power, lack of jurisdiction to proceed in this matter, and the War Crimes and other Criminal Acts being carried out against him! 21. Objection to the absence of evidence in the Docket of this Court to support that perfecting of Service of Process in this matter. 22. Objection to fraud being committed upon this Court by the Judges, Clerks, Sheriff, Prosecutor and Court/County Officials, etc. 23. All documents and/or evidence alleged to support the indictments made against alleged Defendant in this action. Evidence – a reasonable mind may conclude – that should have been provided with any such allege Complaint filed to support this matter. 24. Jurisdictional defenses set forth in this instant matter as well as the objections set forth in same that is alleged to have instituted this frivolous prosecution. 25. Defenses and objections are based on defects in the alleged indictment(s), information, or complaint which cannot be substantiated. 26. This instant Motion is timely, properly and adequately submitted to suppress “ALL” alleged evidence, including but not limited to statements and identification testimony, on the ground that this action is illegally and/or unlawful and has been instituted for purposes of committing fraud upon the Court, to cause undue duress, pain, suffering, hardship, oppression, enslavement, torture, mental injury/harm, and other reasons known to the State of Ohio Officials, County Officials and Court Officials, etc. 27. Through this instant Motion Miller-EL is demanding and/or requesting pursuant to Rule 14 of the ORCRP, the severance of “ALL” allege charges and/or claims against the allege Defendant in this matter. 28. Pursuant to Rule 12 (E)(2) of the ORCRP, in the interest of affording justice to take its course, demand and/or request the documents and/or evidence alleged to support the indictments against the alleged Defendant as well as evidence used to support the alleged Complaint (i.e. which does not appear in the Docket of this Court); however, is falsely alleged to exist according to Docket Entries!
  19. 19. Page 13 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 29. Due to indigent status, that this Court immediately provide Miller-EL with the Transcript from the October 25, 2019, Arraignment Hearing. 30. During the October 25, 2019, Arraignment Hearing, this Court pursuant to Rule 5 of the ORCP, failed to advise Miller-EL that he “need make no statement.” Thus, infringing upon the protected rights of Miller-EL which further subject him to War Crimes and other Criminal Acts. 31. According to October 25, 2019, Docket Entry, this Court notes in part, “Reading of Indictment waived. Twenty-Four Hour Service Waived. Defendant PLEAD Not Guilty to Indictment.” A reasonable mind may conclude that such an assertion is one alleged against Miller-EL having been placed in life-threatening conditions, subjected to torture, abuse, intimidation, mental/physical abuse, coercion, etc. and are practices prohibited under National and/or International Laws! Furthermore, pursuant to Rule 5 of the ORCP, this Court failed to advise Miller-EL that during an “Initial Appearance” and/or “Arraignment Hearing” obtained through fraud and other criminal acts, that he is not required to enter a plea! RULE 5. Initial Appearance, Preliminary Hearing (3) That the defendant need make no statement and any statement made may be used against the defendant;. . . In felony cases the defendant shall not be called upon to plead either at the initial appearance or at a preliminary hearing. 32. That this instant matter and the frivolous indictment alleged be dismissed for the reasons set forth in this instant NOLOJ 33. This Motion has been timely brought. 34. This instant Motion is submitted in good faith and is not submitted for purposes of delay, harassment, hindering proceedings, embarrassment, obstructing the administration of justice, vexatious litigation, increasing the cost of litigation, etc. and is filed to protect and preserve the protected rights of Miller-EL guaranteed and/or secured under National and/or International Laws governing said matters. Unlawful/Illegal practices in furtherance of the War Crimes and Criminal Act being carried out against Miller-EL! III. MOTION OF ARREST OF JUDGMENT WITHOUT waiving the lack of Jurisdictional defenses of this Court, Michael Anthony Miller-EL (through this Motion for Production of Evidence) pursuant to Rule 34 of the ORCRP further demand and/or request that this Court arrest Judgment. In support thereof, further state:
  20. 20. Page 14 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page RULE 34. Arrest of Judgment The court on motion of the defendant shall arrest judgment if the indictment, information, or complaint does not charge an offense or if the court was without jurisdiction of the offense charged. When the judgment is arrested, the defendant shall be discharged, and his position with respect to the prosecution is as if the indictment, information, or complaint had not been returned or filed. 35. The alleged Indictments, information and/or Complaint do not charge offense(s) and neither does this Court have Jurisdiction to proceed on alleged indictments/offenses charged! 36. Michael Anthony Miller-EL demand and/or request that the Judgment be arrested and this instant matter be discharged with prejudice. 37. In the interest of the due course of Justice, relief is sought for the arrest of Judgment in that the alleged Indictment(s), information, and/or Complaint is frivolous and should have never been filed – i.e. as evidenced through the War Crimes and other Criminal Acts evidenced in the record of this Court regarding this instant matter. IV. NOTICE TO CEASE and DESIST PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: For the above foregoing reasons set forth as well as reasons known the Plaintiff, notice is hereby issued of and against the State of Ohio, its County Officials, Court Officials and their Representatives, Legal Counsel, etc. to CEASE and DESIST from the unlawful acts, War Crimes and Criminal Acts leveled against Michael Anthony Miller-EL (a/k/a Michael Miller-EL)! In further support of this instant Cease and Desist do state that he: 38. Authorizes the use of this instant NOLOJ for use in Legal/Lawful matters before International Tribunals… 39. Reiterates his objections to being Kidnapped, Falsely Imprisoned, Enslaved, Tortured, Threatened, Coerced, Degraded, Humiliated, subjected to Cruelty/Inhumane Treatment, etc. in retaliation to his being a Witness to the War Crimes and Criminal Acts being carried out in the Cuyahoga County, Ohio – i.e. in the Judicial Process and Detention/Prison System, etc. – as set forth in his Affidavit(s) submitted to this Court for filing. Said acts which are violations to his protected and secured Rights under National and International Laws! ROME STATUTE: Section 1.01 Article 55 - Rights of Persons During An Investigation 1. In respect of an investigation under this Statute, a person:
  21. 21. Page 15 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page a. Shall not be compelled to incriminate himself or herself or to confess guilt; b. Shall not be subjected to any form of coercion, duress or threat, to torture or to any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; c. Shall, if questioned in a language other than a language the person fully understands and speaks, have, free of any cost, the assistance of a competent interpreter and such translations as are necessary to meet the requirements of fairness; and d. Shall not be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention, and shall not be deprived of his or her liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedures as are established in this Statute. 40. Hereby incorporates consecutively the following documents : (a) Judicial Notice and Proclamation (b) Writ of Prohibition (c) Common Law Writ Of Habeas Corpus (d) Additional Article (e) Writ Quo Warranto:/Affidavit of Truth/Public Notice (f) Jurat Ackknowledgment (g) Treaty of Peace & Friendship 1787 Between Morocco and The United States (h) Conclusion of Dejure Law & Facts (i) War Against the Constitution/People of Congress (j) Facts
  22. 22. Page 16 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page (k) Jurisdiction Challenge (l) Relief Sought (m) Affidavit of Fact and Surrender of the Alleged Defendant/Legal Person/Legal Entity, Michael Anthony Miller (n) Certificate of Service (o) Egypt, Capital Empire of the Dominion of Africa – Affidavit of Truth (p) Public Notice [INSERTION OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED DOCUMENTS FOLLOW]
  23. 23. Michael Miller-El Michael Miller-El, Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
  24. 24. Michael Miller El Michael Miller-EL Michael Miller-EL MICHAEL MILLER ) Michael Miller-EL
  25. 25. Michael Miller-El Cuyahoga County City Jail #CR-19-641058-A #CR-01-414098-ZA #CR-94-305226-ZA #CR-92-284038-B #CR-87-221522-A Michael Miller-El
  26. 26. Michael Miller-El Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas State of Ohio Republic (dba) judges clerks et al
  27. 27. Michael Miller-El CR-19-641058-A Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
  28. 28. Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
  29. 29. Michael Miller-El Michael Miller-El
  30. 30. Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
  31. 31. Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
  32. 32. Michael Miller-El CR-19-641058-A “MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER” Michael Anthony Miller Michael Anthony Miller MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER Michael Anthony Miller- “MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER” MILLER A MICHAEL MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER MICHAEL MILLER MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER Michael Anthony Miller Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
  33. 33. Miller A Michael
  34. 34. Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
  35. 35. Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
  36. 36. Page 17 of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page Miller-EL reserves the right to amend this Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals… should he and/or this Court believes it is necessary in that it is being provided in in Love, Truth, Peace for the purpose of obtaining his Freedom and to see that Justice take its course. This instant NOLOJ is submitted in good faith and is not submitted for purposes of delay, harassment, hindering proceedings, embarrassment, obstructing the administration of justice, vexatious litigation, increasing the cost of litigation, etc. and is filed to protect and preserve the protected rights of Miller-EL guaranteed and/or secured under National and/or International Laws governing said matters. Respectfully submitted this 1st day of November, 2019. _________________________________ Michael Anthony Miller-EL Special Filing – Pro Se CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that in accordance with the Rule(s) governing said procedure(s) and matter, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion To Arrest Judgment/Authorization Of Use Before International Tribunals… has been produced and has been mailed via First-Class Postage Paid or Hand Delivered to: Cuyahoga County Office of the Prosecutor ATTN: Michael C. O’Malley ATTN: Jonathan McDonald The Justice Center –9thFloor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Respectfully submitted this 1st day of November, 2019. _________________________________ Michael Anthony Miller-EL Special Filing - Pro Se

×