SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Download to read offline
Student Evaluations of Teaching for Tracey Roberts (4122LAW87205 -
PARTNERSHIP TAXATION)
School of Law Student Evaluations of Teaching
Project Audience 4
Responses Received 3
Creation Date Tue, May 15, 2012
Do you have any comments about the text or course materials? Please explain.
Students
1. I really liked the material. It was great to have variations of examples after the material was discussed.
2. Love the text. The accompanying problems. Also the professors explanations of the problems that were posted
are invaluable to make sure I was doing the work correctly.
3. Good text, but seems to have a disconnect with the problem set. It would have been helpful if the text alerted to
how other more complex problems might arise -- even a brief listing of cross-referenced chapters that could be
involved in answering given problems.
2/14
If written assignments for which individual grades or comments were given were
required, did they contribute to your understanding of the subject? For such writing
assignments, was there any feedback and was the feedback helpful to your
understanding? Please explain.
Students
1. N/A
2. Yes, the weekly chapter problem sets were necessary to keep from getting behind and confused throughtout the
semester.
3. Although no written assignments were required, it would have been helpful to have feedback from a written
assignment to know expected level of information and preferred formats in order to prepare for exam.
3/14
If you desired to consult with Professor(Tracey Roberts), was he/she reasonably
available? Please explain.
Students
1. Yes, she was.
2. Yes. She always let us now her availibility
3. She was available, and I talked with her on several occasions.
4/14
Did Professor (Tracey Roberts) generally reschedule classes he or she canceled?
Please explain.
Students
1. Yes, only cancelled once and rescheduled the class accordingly.
2. N/A
3. n/a
5/14
Does Professor (Tracey Roberts) create a positive learning atmosphere by avoiding
negative stereotypes or other expressions of gender, racial, ethnic, age, religion,
national origin or sexual orientation bias? Please explain.
Students
1. Yes, she did.
2. Yes, we only had a four person class so it was a very relaxed setting.
6/14
With regard to the law, does Professor (Tracey Roberts) encourage students to think
independently and critically? Please explain.
Students
1. Somewhat. The materials were more so focused on understanding the law and the code. However, there were a
few breaks were the law was unclear and she posed questions on how the law should develop from this point
forward.
2. Yes, posing questions throughtout her presentations to keep the class involved.
7/14
Was there any teaching method or activity used by Professor (Tracey Roberts) that
was particularly beneficial to the learning process? Please explain.
Students
1. I appreciated her working through the problems step by step flushing out our ambiguities with the material.
2. Problem sets
3. The focus on working through problems was extremely helpful, as were her notes made available so that we
could double check our own work at a slower pace.
8/14
What was your overall opinion of the teaching performance by Professor (Tracey
Roberts) in this course?
Students
1. It was outstanding. I think she does a good job. I also like the subject of tax and appreciate her experience and
expertise in the subject.
2. Great
3. I really enjoyed Prof. Roberts as a person. My hesitancy of teaching performance is that she doesn't seem to
have found her own unique teaching style, which made class (especially when trying to give non-scripted answers
to questions asked in class). She seems to try to hard to "channel" the Cunninghams rather than just trying to
teach the material in her own way. No doubt the Cunninghams are great professors, but teaching style is a very
individualized trait.
9/14
Please indicate the appropriate response category. (Tracey Roberts)
Competency Statistics Value
Mean 4.60
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.53
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.07
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.53
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.07
1. The assigned reading in the text contributed
significantly to your understanding of this course.
If no text was used, do not answer.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.67
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
2. You would recommend that the professor use
the primary text again. If no primary text was
used, do not answer.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.67
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
3. Course materials other than the assigned
reading in the text contributed significantly to your
understanding of this course. If no other course
materials were used, do not answer.
Statistics Value
Response Count 2
Mean 4.50
Median 4.50
Mode 4, 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.71
4. You would recommend to the professor the use
of these course materials again. If no other
course materials were used, do not answer.
Statistics Value
Response Count 2
Mean 5.00
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00
10/14
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.50
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.50
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.35
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00
5. Early in the semester the professor made
available a syllabus which effectively explained
the scope and outline of the course (topics or
pages to be covered) and the expectations for
the students (assignments, basis of course
grade, attendance).
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 5.00
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00
6. The professor s classroom presentations were
clear.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 3.67
Median 4.00
Mode 4
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
7. The professor was well prepared for every
class.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.00
Median 4.00
Mode 4
Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00
8. The professor included current developments
in the course area.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.00
Median 4.00
Mode 4
Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00
11/14
Please indicate the appropriate response category. (Tracey Roberts) (continued)
9. The professor distributed the workload
equitably throughout the semester.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.67
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
10. Classroom attendance added significantly to
the learning experience.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 5.00
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00
11. The professor emphasized key points in class
discussion.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.33
Median 4.00
Mode 4
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
12. The professor regularly used the entire class
time.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.67
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
13. The class met for the full semester or for the
time specifically stated on the syllabus.
Statistics Value
14. The professor treated students with respect
appropriate to the circumstances.
Statistics Value
12/14
Response Count 3
Mean 4.67
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
Response Count 3
Mean 5.00
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00
15. The professor created an environment in
which students were encouraged to express
varying points of view and engage in meaningful
dialogue.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 5.00
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00
16. The professor displayed enthusiasm for the
subject.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.67
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
13/14
Please indicate the appropriate response category. (Tracey Roberts) (continued)
17. The professor stimulated student interest in
the subject.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.67
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
18. You would recommend this professor to your
colleagues.
Statistics Value
Response Count 3
Mean 4.67
Median 5.00
Mode 5
Standard Deviation +/-0.58
Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47
Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33
Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27
14/14

More Related Content

What's hot

Classroom observationchecklistform
Classroom observationchecklistformClassroom observationchecklistform
Classroom observationchecklistformJavier Cortez
 
Teacher's handout test report and remedial work feb 2016
Teacher's handout test report and remedial work feb 2016Teacher's handout test report and remedial work feb 2016
Teacher's handout test report and remedial work feb 2016Mr Bounab Samir
 
Teaching English grammar task in inductively in India
Teaching English grammar task in inductively  in IndiaTeaching English grammar task in inductively  in India
Teaching English grammar task in inductively in Indiasunandakannadasan
 
Naplan numeracy prep_bright_ideas
Naplan numeracy prep_bright_ideasNaplan numeracy prep_bright_ideas
Naplan numeracy prep_bright_ideasG.j. Darma
 
1.tutor vista b2c training manual
1.tutor vista b2c training manual1.tutor vista b2c training manual
1.tutor vista b2c training manualshikadeepu
 
Dial "D" For DNA!
Dial "D" For DNA!Dial "D" For DNA!
Dial "D" For DNA!guest61a7d3
 
Dial "D" For DNA
Dial "D" For DNADial "D" For DNA
Dial "D" For DNAchopo312
 
Occe2018: writing e-exams in pre-university college
Occe2018: writing e-exams in pre-university collegeOcce2018: writing e-exams in pre-university college
Occe2018: writing e-exams in pre-university collegemathewhillier
 
Geometry Syllabus
Geometry SyllabusGeometry Syllabus
Geometry Syllabusjtentinger
 
TESTA, SIAST Universities of Regina & Saskathewan Webinar (November 2013)
 TESTA, SIAST Universities of Regina & Saskathewan Webinar (November 2013) TESTA, SIAST Universities of Regina & Saskathewan Webinar (November 2013)
TESTA, SIAST Universities of Regina & Saskathewan Webinar (November 2013)TESTA winch
 
4 ms annual learning plan 1
4 ms annual learning plan  14 ms annual learning plan  1
4 ms annual learning plan 1daoui kada
 
· Etac lesson plan teacher hickslewisweek of oct.19 23,20
· Etac lesson plan teacher hickslewisweek of  oct.19 23,20· Etac lesson plan teacher hickslewisweek of  oct.19 23,20
· Etac lesson plan teacher hickslewisweek of oct.19 23,20piya30
 

What's hot (20)

ADOVH Examination Preparation Presentation.pdf
ADOVH Examination Preparation Presentation.pdfADOVH Examination Preparation Presentation.pdf
ADOVH Examination Preparation Presentation.pdf
 
Classroom observationchecklistform
Classroom observationchecklistformClassroom observationchecklistform
Classroom observationchecklistform
 
Teacher's handout test report and remedial work feb 2016
Teacher's handout test report and remedial work feb 2016Teacher's handout test report and remedial work feb 2016
Teacher's handout test report and remedial work feb 2016
 
Taking the Pizza out of Fractions
Taking the Pizza out of FractionsTaking the Pizza out of Fractions
Taking the Pizza out of Fractions
 
Teaching English grammar task in inductively in India
Teaching English grammar task in inductively  in IndiaTeaching English grammar task in inductively  in India
Teaching English grammar task in inductively in India
 
Session 7
Session 7Session 7
Session 7
 
TSU English 9 SBP
TSU English 9 SBPTSU English 9 SBP
TSU English 9 SBP
 
Naplan numeracy prep_bright_ideas
Naplan numeracy prep_bright_ideasNaplan numeracy prep_bright_ideas
Naplan numeracy prep_bright_ideas
 
Implementing NGSS and CCCS
Implementing NGSS and CCCSImplementing NGSS and CCCS
Implementing NGSS and CCCS
 
CAHSEE
CAHSEECAHSEE
CAHSEE
 
1.tutor vista b2c training manual
1.tutor vista b2c training manual1.tutor vista b2c training manual
1.tutor vista b2c training manual
 
Dial "D" For DNA!
Dial "D" For DNA!Dial "D" For DNA!
Dial "D" For DNA!
 
Dial "D" For DNA
Dial "D" For DNADial "D" For DNA
Dial "D" For DNA
 
Occe2018: writing e-exams in pre-university college
Occe2018: writing e-exams in pre-university collegeOcce2018: writing e-exams in pre-university college
Occe2018: writing e-exams in pre-university college
 
Geometry Syllabus
Geometry SyllabusGeometry Syllabus
Geometry Syllabus
 
TESTA, SIAST Universities of Regina & Saskathewan Webinar (November 2013)
 TESTA, SIAST Universities of Regina & Saskathewan Webinar (November 2013) TESTA, SIAST Universities of Regina & Saskathewan Webinar (November 2013)
TESTA, SIAST Universities of Regina & Saskathewan Webinar (November 2013)
 
4 ms annual learning plan 1
4 ms annual learning plan  14 ms annual learning plan  1
4 ms annual learning plan 1
 
Sample Lesson Plans
Sample Lesson PlansSample Lesson Plans
Sample Lesson Plans
 
Copy checking
Copy checkingCopy checking
Copy checking
 
· Etac lesson plan teacher hickslewisweek of oct.19 23,20
· Etac lesson plan teacher hickslewisweek of  oct.19 23,20· Etac lesson plan teacher hickslewisweek of  oct.19 23,20
· Etac lesson plan teacher hickslewisweek of oct.19 23,20
 

Viewers also liked

2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Income Taxation sec 002
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Income Taxation sec 0022012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Income Taxation sec 002
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Income Taxation sec 002Tracey Roberts
 
Roberts Tracey_FedIncTaxCorpPartnrshp_FA15
Roberts Tracey_FedIncTaxCorpPartnrshp_FA15Roberts Tracey_FedIncTaxCorpPartnrshp_FA15
Roberts Tracey_FedIncTaxCorpPartnrshp_FA15Tracey Roberts
 
Shop floor assistant performance appraisal
Shop floor assistant performance appraisalShop floor assistant performance appraisal
Shop floor assistant performance appraisalRobertoCarlos012
 
Software specialist performance appraisal
Software specialist performance appraisalSoftware specialist performance appraisal
Software specialist performance appraisalRobertoCarlos012
 
Final 3D scavenger hunt
Final 3D scavenger huntFinal 3D scavenger hunt
Final 3D scavenger hunthernandezi9147
 
2016 Spring Fed Income Tax (Upper Div) UC Hastings
2016 Spring Fed Income Tax (Upper Div) UC Hastings2016 Spring Fed Income Tax (Upper Div) UC Hastings
2016 Spring Fed Income Tax (Upper Div) UC HastingsTracey Roberts
 
Solutions manager performance appraisal
Solutions manager performance appraisalSolutions manager performance appraisal
Solutions manager performance appraisalRobertoCarlos012
 
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Partnership Tax
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Partnership Tax2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Partnership Tax
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Partnership TaxTracey Roberts
 
2012 Roberts Spring BFIT Student Evaluations
2012 Roberts Spring BFIT Student Evaluations2012 Roberts Spring BFIT Student Evaluations
2012 Roberts Spring BFIT Student EvaluationsTracey Roberts
 
Solution specialist performance appraisal
Solution specialist performance appraisalSolution specialist performance appraisal
Solution specialist performance appraisalRobertoCarlos012
 
2013 Fall Income Tax (TMR Section)
2013 Fall Income Tax (TMR Section)2013 Fall Income Tax (TMR Section)
2013 Fall Income Tax (TMR Section)Tracey Roberts
 
Settlement officer performance appraisal
Settlement officer performance appraisalSettlement officer performance appraisal
Settlement officer performance appraisalRobertoCarlos012
 
2014 Spring Partnership and Corporate Tax (Seattle)
2014 Spring Partnership and Corporate Tax (Seattle)2014 Spring Partnership and Corporate Tax (Seattle)
2014 Spring Partnership and Corporate Tax (Seattle)Tracey Roberts
 
HAP 752 Semester Long Project Write-Up Koyin Aladesuru Linkedin
HAP 752 Semester Long Project Write-Up Koyin Aladesuru LinkedinHAP 752 Semester Long Project Write-Up Koyin Aladesuru Linkedin
HAP 752 Semester Long Project Write-Up Koyin Aladesuru LinkedinKoyin Aladesuru
 

Viewers also liked (16)

2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Income Taxation sec 002
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Income Taxation sec 0022012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Income Taxation sec 002
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Income Taxation sec 002
 
Roberts Tracey_FedIncTaxCorpPartnrshp_FA15
Roberts Tracey_FedIncTaxCorpPartnrshp_FA15Roberts Tracey_FedIncTaxCorpPartnrshp_FA15
Roberts Tracey_FedIncTaxCorpPartnrshp_FA15
 
Shop floor assistant performance appraisal
Shop floor assistant performance appraisalShop floor assistant performance appraisal
Shop floor assistant performance appraisal
 
Software specialist performance appraisal
Software specialist performance appraisalSoftware specialist performance appraisal
Software specialist performance appraisal
 
Final 3D scavenger hunt
Final 3D scavenger huntFinal 3D scavenger hunt
Final 3D scavenger hunt
 
Узаконивание перепланировки
Узаконивание перепланировкиУзаконивание перепланировки
Узаконивание перепланировки
 
2016 Spring Fed Income Tax (Upper Div) UC Hastings
2016 Spring Fed Income Tax (Upper Div) UC Hastings2016 Spring Fed Income Tax (Upper Div) UC Hastings
2016 Spring Fed Income Tax (Upper Div) UC Hastings
 
Solutions manager performance appraisal
Solutions manager performance appraisalSolutions manager performance appraisal
Solutions manager performance appraisal
 
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Partnership Tax
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Partnership Tax2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Partnership Tax
2012 Roberts Fall South Carolina Roberts Partnership Tax
 
2012 Roberts Spring BFIT Student Evaluations
2012 Roberts Spring BFIT Student Evaluations2012 Roberts Spring BFIT Student Evaluations
2012 Roberts Spring BFIT Student Evaluations
 
Solution specialist performance appraisal
Solution specialist performance appraisalSolution specialist performance appraisal
Solution specialist performance appraisal
 
2013 Fall Income Tax (TMR Section)
2013 Fall Income Tax (TMR Section)2013 Fall Income Tax (TMR Section)
2013 Fall Income Tax (TMR Section)
 
Settlement officer performance appraisal
Settlement officer performance appraisalSettlement officer performance appraisal
Settlement officer performance appraisal
 
Перевод жилого помещения в нежилое
Перевод жилого помещения в нежилоеПеревод жилого помещения в нежилое
Перевод жилого помещения в нежилое
 
2014 Spring Partnership and Corporate Tax (Seattle)
2014 Spring Partnership and Corporate Tax (Seattle)2014 Spring Partnership and Corporate Tax (Seattle)
2014 Spring Partnership and Corporate Tax (Seattle)
 
HAP 752 Semester Long Project Write-Up Koyin Aladesuru Linkedin
HAP 752 Semester Long Project Write-Up Koyin Aladesuru LinkedinHAP 752 Semester Long Project Write-Up Koyin Aladesuru Linkedin
HAP 752 Semester Long Project Write-Up Koyin Aladesuru Linkedin
 

Similar to 2012 Roberts Spring Partnership Tax Student Evals

UWYOIntrotoIntlBusINBU-1040-01INST-1040-01_DouglasPeterson
UWYOIntrotoIntlBusINBU-1040-01INST-1040-01_DouglasPetersonUWYOIntrotoIntlBusINBU-1040-01INST-1040-01_DouglasPeterson
UWYOIntrotoIntlBusINBU-1040-01INST-1040-01_DouglasPetersondrdoug3
 
TOS-WITH-OVERVIEW-OF-TEST-CONSTRUCTION.pptx
TOS-WITH-OVERVIEW-OF-TEST-CONSTRUCTION.pptxTOS-WITH-OVERVIEW-OF-TEST-CONSTRUCTION.pptx
TOS-WITH-OVERVIEW-OF-TEST-CONSTRUCTION.pptxJhayTangco
 
Intro to e as t-tle
Intro to e as t-tleIntro to e as t-tle
Intro to e as t-tlejudeweavers
 
Total Possible Score 4.00ContentTotal 3.00Distinguished - .docx
Total Possible Score 4.00ContentTotal 3.00Distinguished - .docxTotal Possible Score 4.00ContentTotal 3.00Distinguished - .docx
Total Possible Score 4.00ContentTotal 3.00Distinguished - .docxturveycharlyn
 
Patuxent High School Collaborative Action Research Plan
Patuxent High School Collaborative Action Research PlanPatuxent High School Collaborative Action Research Plan
Patuxent High School Collaborative Action Research PlanMatt Stone
 
Ideal Teacher
Ideal TeacherIdeal Teacher
Ideal Teacherkiskimash
 
Teacher Evaluation Report for BT2101 (Tutorial)
Teacher Evaluation Report for BT2101 (Tutorial)Teacher Evaluation Report for BT2101 (Tutorial)
Teacher Evaluation Report for BT2101 (Tutorial)Yunkun Zhao, PhD
 
Test construction Villa
Test construction VillaTest construction Villa
Test construction VillaArnel Rivera
 
Spring 2015 Student Evaluation of Teaching _MATH-1131Q-034D-STORR- Calculus I
Spring 2015 Student Evaluation of Teaching _MATH-1131Q-034D-STORR- Calculus ISpring 2015 Student Evaluation of Teaching _MATH-1131Q-034D-STORR- Calculus I
Spring 2015 Student Evaluation of Teaching _MATH-1131Q-034D-STORR- Calculus IDaniel Bloch
 
December 1 sst training
December 1 sst trainingDecember 1 sst training
December 1 sst trainingReedheiress
 
Carp presentation
Carp   presentationCarp   presentation
Carp presentationMsMatthew
 
Classroom System Essential Features
Classroom System Essential FeaturesClassroom System Essential Features
Classroom System Essential FeaturesNanci Johnson
 
Table of Specifications (TOS) and Test Construction Review
Table of Specifications (TOS) and Test Construction ReviewTable of Specifications (TOS) and Test Construction Review
Table of Specifications (TOS) and Test Construction ReviewRivera Arnel
 
Working in alberta schools
Working in alberta schoolsWorking in alberta schools
Working in alberta schoolsandymaniac
 
Assessment for learning Lars Helle - Sviland Skole
Assessment for learning   Lars Helle - Sviland SkoleAssessment for learning   Lars Helle - Sviland Skole
Assessment for learning Lars Helle - Sviland Skolevittovolte
 
Assesment for learning lars helle - sviland skole
Assesment for learning   lars helle - sviland skoleAssesment for learning   lars helle - sviland skole
Assesment for learning lars helle - sviland skoleRenate Furenes
 

Similar to 2012 Roberts Spring Partnership Tax Student Evals (20)

UWYOIntrotoIntlBusINBU-1040-01INST-1040-01_DouglasPeterson
UWYOIntrotoIntlBusINBU-1040-01INST-1040-01_DouglasPetersonUWYOIntrotoIntlBusINBU-1040-01INST-1040-01_DouglasPeterson
UWYOIntrotoIntlBusINBU-1040-01INST-1040-01_DouglasPeterson
 
Mark Parkinson
Mark Parkinson Mark Parkinson
Mark Parkinson
 
TOS-WITH-OVERVIEW-OF-TEST-CONSTRUCTION.pptx
TOS-WITH-OVERVIEW-OF-TEST-CONSTRUCTION.pptxTOS-WITH-OVERVIEW-OF-TEST-CONSTRUCTION.pptx
TOS-WITH-OVERVIEW-OF-TEST-CONSTRUCTION.pptx
 
Intro to e as t-tle
Intro to e as t-tleIntro to e as t-tle
Intro to e as t-tle
 
Total Possible Score 4.00ContentTotal 3.00Distinguished - .docx
Total Possible Score 4.00ContentTotal 3.00Distinguished - .docxTotal Possible Score 4.00ContentTotal 3.00Distinguished - .docx
Total Possible Score 4.00ContentTotal 3.00Distinguished - .docx
 
Patuxent High School Collaborative Action Research Plan
Patuxent High School Collaborative Action Research PlanPatuxent High School Collaborative Action Research Plan
Patuxent High School Collaborative Action Research Plan
 
Ideal Teacher
Ideal TeacherIdeal Teacher
Ideal Teacher
 
Teacher Evaluation Report for BT2101 (Tutorial)
Teacher Evaluation Report for BT2101 (Tutorial)Teacher Evaluation Report for BT2101 (Tutorial)
Teacher Evaluation Report for BT2101 (Tutorial)
 
Test construction Villa
Test construction VillaTest construction Villa
Test construction Villa
 
Episode2
Episode2Episode2
Episode2
 
CARP
CARPCARP
CARP
 
Spring 2015 Student Evaluation of Teaching _MATH-1131Q-034D-STORR- Calculus I
Spring 2015 Student Evaluation of Teaching _MATH-1131Q-034D-STORR- Calculus ISpring 2015 Student Evaluation of Teaching _MATH-1131Q-034D-STORR- Calculus I
Spring 2015 Student Evaluation of Teaching _MATH-1131Q-034D-STORR- Calculus I
 
December 1 sst training
December 1 sst trainingDecember 1 sst training
December 1 sst training
 
Carp presentation
Carp   presentationCarp   presentation
Carp presentation
 
Classroom System Essential Features
Classroom System Essential FeaturesClassroom System Essential Features
Classroom System Essential Features
 
Tosandtcdo 160606120705
Tosandtcdo 160606120705Tosandtcdo 160606120705
Tosandtcdo 160606120705
 
Table of Specifications (TOS) and Test Construction Review
Table of Specifications (TOS) and Test Construction ReviewTable of Specifications (TOS) and Test Construction Review
Table of Specifications (TOS) and Test Construction Review
 
Working in alberta schools
Working in alberta schoolsWorking in alberta schools
Working in alberta schools
 
Assessment for learning Lars Helle - Sviland Skole
Assessment for learning   Lars Helle - Sviland SkoleAssessment for learning   Lars Helle - Sviland Skole
Assessment for learning Lars Helle - Sviland Skole
 
Assesment for learning lars helle - sviland skole
Assesment for learning   lars helle - sviland skoleAssesment for learning   lars helle - sviland skole
Assesment for learning lars helle - sviland skole
 

2012 Roberts Spring Partnership Tax Student Evals

  • 1. Student Evaluations of Teaching for Tracey Roberts (4122LAW87205 - PARTNERSHIP TAXATION) School of Law Student Evaluations of Teaching Project Audience 4 Responses Received 3 Creation Date Tue, May 15, 2012
  • 2. Do you have any comments about the text or course materials? Please explain. Students 1. I really liked the material. It was great to have variations of examples after the material was discussed. 2. Love the text. The accompanying problems. Also the professors explanations of the problems that were posted are invaluable to make sure I was doing the work correctly. 3. Good text, but seems to have a disconnect with the problem set. It would have been helpful if the text alerted to how other more complex problems might arise -- even a brief listing of cross-referenced chapters that could be involved in answering given problems. 2/14
  • 3. If written assignments for which individual grades or comments were given were required, did they contribute to your understanding of the subject? For such writing assignments, was there any feedback and was the feedback helpful to your understanding? Please explain. Students 1. N/A 2. Yes, the weekly chapter problem sets were necessary to keep from getting behind and confused throughtout the semester. 3. Although no written assignments were required, it would have been helpful to have feedback from a written assignment to know expected level of information and preferred formats in order to prepare for exam. 3/14
  • 4. If you desired to consult with Professor(Tracey Roberts), was he/she reasonably available? Please explain. Students 1. Yes, she was. 2. Yes. She always let us now her availibility 3. She was available, and I talked with her on several occasions. 4/14
  • 5. Did Professor (Tracey Roberts) generally reschedule classes he or she canceled? Please explain. Students 1. Yes, only cancelled once and rescheduled the class accordingly. 2. N/A 3. n/a 5/14
  • 6. Does Professor (Tracey Roberts) create a positive learning atmosphere by avoiding negative stereotypes or other expressions of gender, racial, ethnic, age, religion, national origin or sexual orientation bias? Please explain. Students 1. Yes, she did. 2. Yes, we only had a four person class so it was a very relaxed setting. 6/14
  • 7. With regard to the law, does Professor (Tracey Roberts) encourage students to think independently and critically? Please explain. Students 1. Somewhat. The materials were more so focused on understanding the law and the code. However, there were a few breaks were the law was unclear and she posed questions on how the law should develop from this point forward. 2. Yes, posing questions throughtout her presentations to keep the class involved. 7/14
  • 8. Was there any teaching method or activity used by Professor (Tracey Roberts) that was particularly beneficial to the learning process? Please explain. Students 1. I appreciated her working through the problems step by step flushing out our ambiguities with the material. 2. Problem sets 3. The focus on working through problems was extremely helpful, as were her notes made available so that we could double check our own work at a slower pace. 8/14
  • 9. What was your overall opinion of the teaching performance by Professor (Tracey Roberts) in this course? Students 1. It was outstanding. I think she does a good job. I also like the subject of tax and appreciate her experience and expertise in the subject. 2. Great 3. I really enjoyed Prof. Roberts as a person. My hesitancy of teaching performance is that she doesn't seem to have found her own unique teaching style, which made class (especially when trying to give non-scripted answers to questions asked in class). She seems to try to hard to "channel" the Cunninghams rather than just trying to teach the material in her own way. No doubt the Cunninghams are great professors, but teaching style is a very individualized trait. 9/14
  • 10. Please indicate the appropriate response category. (Tracey Roberts) Competency Statistics Value Mean 4.60 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.53 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.07 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.53 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.07 1. The assigned reading in the text contributed significantly to your understanding of this course. If no text was used, do not answer. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.67 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 2. You would recommend that the professor use the primary text again. If no primary text was used, do not answer. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.67 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 3. Course materials other than the assigned reading in the text contributed significantly to your understanding of this course. If no other course materials were used, do not answer. Statistics Value Response Count 2 Mean 4.50 Median 4.50 Mode 4, 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.71 4. You would recommend to the professor the use of these course materials again. If no other course materials were used, do not answer. Statistics Value Response Count 2 Mean 5.00 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00 10/14
  • 11. Population Standard Deviation +/-0.50 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.50 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.35 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00 5. Early in the semester the professor made available a syllabus which effectively explained the scope and outline of the course (topics or pages to be covered) and the expectations for the students (assignments, basis of course grade, attendance). Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 5.00 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00 6. The professor s classroom presentations were clear. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 3.67 Median 4.00 Mode 4 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 7. The professor was well prepared for every class. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.00 Median 4.00 Mode 4 Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00 8. The professor included current developments in the course area. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.00 Median 4.00 Mode 4 Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00 11/14
  • 12. Please indicate the appropriate response category. (Tracey Roberts) (continued) 9. The professor distributed the workload equitably throughout the semester. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.67 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 10. Classroom attendance added significantly to the learning experience. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 5.00 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00 11. The professor emphasized key points in class discussion. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.33 Median 4.00 Mode 4 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 12. The professor regularly used the entire class time. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.67 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 13. The class met for the full semester or for the time specifically stated on the syllabus. Statistics Value 14. The professor treated students with respect appropriate to the circumstances. Statistics Value 12/14
  • 13. Response Count 3 Mean 4.67 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 Response Count 3 Mean 5.00 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00 15. The professor created an environment in which students were encouraged to express varying points of view and engage in meaningful dialogue. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 5.00 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.00 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.00 16. The professor displayed enthusiasm for the subject. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.67 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 13/14
  • 14. Please indicate the appropriate response category. (Tracey Roberts) (continued) 17. The professor stimulated student interest in the subject. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.67 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 18. You would recommend this professor to your colleagues. Statistics Value Response Count 3 Mean 4.67 Median 5.00 Mode 5 Standard Deviation +/-0.58 Population Standard Deviation +/-0.47 Standard Error (base on SD) +/-0.33 Standard Error (base on PSD) +/-0.27 14/14