Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) experience of silicone implant rupture: three cases report
Tony W Chi, MD MBA
Nagashima Breast Imaging Center,
NBIC Clinic,
Taiwan
Summary:
With the increasing prevalence of breast augmentation and frequency of ABVS for breast cancer screening in Taiwan Society, radiologists should be familiar with the probably ABVS signs of implant rupture to prevent misinterpretation.
3. ⦿ 3 cases of silicone implant rupture
› 1st case: pain & breast enlargement
› 2nd case: axillary mass
› 3rd case: no symptom
⦿ Implant Intact:
› homogenous anechoic interior
⦿ Implant rupture:
› multiple parallel echogenic lines in the implant interior
› echodense aggregates in the implant lumen
› mixture of hyperechoic and hypoechoic masses
› hyperechoic posterior shadowing within lymph nodes
› invagination of shell without touch of the two
membranes
4. ⦿ Cosmetic breast augmentation
› increasingly procedure performed in Taiwan
⦿ Prosthesis implantation
› the most common technique
⦿ The exact incidence of rupture is unknown
⦿ The risk of rupture
› directly related to the age of the implant
› inversely related to the thickness of the elastomer shell
⦿ (Brown SL, Middleton MS, Berg WA, Soo MS, Pennello G. Prevalence of rupture of
silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in
Birmingham, Alabama. AJR 2000; 175:1057-1064)
5. ⦿ Most of the women do not have a right concept about
› the routine breast prosthesis examination
› the rupture risk of the breast prosthesis
⦿ Some of them
› afraid of the compression technique of mammogram
› or not affordable the Breast MRI yearly
⦿ Automated breast volume scanner
(ABVS, Siemens) may be better used to replace
breast MRI as a yearly screening tool
› not only early detection of breast cancer
› but also the possibility of implant rupture
6. ⦿ We would like to present three cases of silicone
implant rupture, all of whom underwent ABVS
› two extracapsular type
› one intracapsular type
⦿ ABVS findings (no. of cases)
› multiple parallel echogenic lines in the implant interior
“stepladder sign” (2)
› echodense aggregates in the implant lumen (2)
› mixture of hyperechoic and hypoechoic masses (2)
› hyperechoic posterior shadowing within lymph nodes
“snowstorm sign” (1)
› invagination of shell without touch of the two membranes
“keyhole sign” (1)
7. 50 year-old female
cc: significant enlargement of the breast in past few months
Implants: 19 years/subglandular
Rupture: extracapsular
19. ⦿ Implant rupture as a late complication of breast
implant surgery
› often a silent phenomenon
› difficult to diagnose
⦿ Ultrasound detects silicone implant rupture
› sensitivity of 50-77
› specificity of 55-84%
⦿ (Venta LA, Salomon CG, Flisak ME, Venta ER, Izquierdo R, Angelats J. Sonographic
signs of breast implant rupture. AJR 1996; 166:1413-1419)
20. ⦿ The sign of intracapsular rupture
› the visualization of “stepladder sign”
› low level echoes within the implant
› echogenic focus of silicone between the implant
shell and fibrous capsule
⦿ (Caskey CI, Berg WA, Anderson ND, et al. Breast implant rupture:
diagnosis with US. Radiology 1994;190:819-823)
21. ⦿ The sign of extracapsular rupture
› the present of free echogenic nodule with well-
defined anterior margin and dirty incoherent
posterior shadowing within either the breast
stroma or lymph nodes, so called “snowstorm
sign”
⦿ (Harris KM, Ganott MA, Shestak KC, Losken HW, Tobon H. Silicone
implant rupture: detection with US. Radiology 1993; 187:761-768)
22. ⦿ In addition to the traditional ultrasound sign of
implant rupture, ABVS can also present the
similar MRI sign of minimally collapsed
intracapsular rupture in our case such as
› “keyhole sign
⦿ Soo MS Kornguth PJ, Walsh R, et al. INtracapsular implant rupture: MR
findings of incomplete shell collapse. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:724-730
23. ⦿ With the increasing prevalence of breast
augmentation and frequency of ABVS for
breast cancer screening in Taiwan Society,
radiologists should be familiar with the
probably ABVS signs of implant rupture to
prevent misinterpretation.
This study included 28 implants in 16 patients, all of whom underwent ABVS in between 2010-2014. The diagnosis of implant rupture was confirmed by surgery. Implant rupture was diagnosed in 5 out of 28 implants (17.9%). In those patients with ruptured implants, 2 were belonging to deflation of saline implants and 3 were silicone implants. 3 had no symptoms, 1 presented with pain, and 1 complained of ipsilateral axillary lymph node swelling. Implants with a homogenous anechoic interior were considered to be intact. ABVS findings indicating implant rupture included multiple parallel echogenic lines in the implant interior in 2 cases and a mix of hyperechoic and hypoechoic masses in 3 cases.
Cosmetic breast augmentation is an increasingly common procedure performed in Taiwan. Breast prosthesis implantation is still the most common technique. The exact incidence of breast implant rupture is unknown, although the risk of rupture is directly related to the age of the implant and is inversely related to the thickness of the elastomer shell.
*(Brown SL, Middleton MS, Berg WA, Soo MS, Pennello G. Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, Alabama. AJR 2000; 175:1057-1064)
Most of the women with breast augmentation do not have a right concept about the routine breast examination and the rupture risk of the breast prosthesis. Some of them are afraid of the compression technique of mammography. Breast MRI, standard technique to detect implant rupture, may be too expensive for them. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS, Siemens) may be better used to replace breast MRI as a yearly screening tool not only early detection of breast cancer but also the possibility of implant rupture.
We would like to present three cases of silicone implant rupture, all of whom underwent ABVS. The diagnosis of implant rupture was confirmed by surgery. Two cases of implant rupture were diagnosed as extracapsular type, whereas the other one was intracapsular type. ABVS findings were including multiple parallel echogenic lines in the implant interior in 2 cases, echodense aggregates in the implant lumen in 2 cases, mixture of hyperechoic and hypoechoic masses in 2 cases, hyperechoic posterior shadowing within lymph nodes in 1 case and invagination of shell without touch of the two membranes in 1 case.
Implant rupture as a late complication of breast implant surgery is often a silent phenomenon that is difficult to diagnose. Ultrasound detects silicone implant rupture with a sensitivity of 50-77% and specificity of 55-84%.
(Venta LA, Salomon CG, Flisak ME, Venta ER, Izquierdo R, Angelats J. Sonographic signs of breast implant rupture. AJR 1996; 166:1413-1419)
The sign of intracapsular rupture is the visualization of “stepladder sign”, low level echoes within the implant or echogenic focus of silicone between the implant shell and fibrous capsule.
(Caskey CI, Berg WA, Anderson ND, et al. Breast implant rupture: diagnosis with US. Radiology 1994;190:819-823)
The sign of extracapsular rupture is the present of free echogenic nodule with well-defined anterior margin and dirty incoherent posterior shadowing within either the breast stroma or lymph nodes, so called “snowstorm sign”.
(Harris KM, Ganott MA, Shestak KC, Losken HW, Tobon H. Silicone implant rupture: detection with US. Radiology 1993; 187:761-768)
In addition to the traditional ultrasound sign of implant rupture, ABVS can also present the similar MRI sign of minimally collapsed intracapsular rupture including the “teardrop sign”, the “keyhole sign”, and the subcapsular line sign” in our cases.
Soo MS Kornguth PJ, Walsh R, et al. INtracapsular implant rupture: MR findings of incomplete shell collapse. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:724-730