SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 16
Download to read offline
Managing over-pressure in deep
saline aquifer storage of CO2
Mike Carpenter, Todd Flach, Semere Solomon (DNV)
Terje Aurdal (Aker Kværner Geo)
EAGE, September 2008
We gratefully acknowledge support for this work from:
- NFR CLIMIT
- DNV Corporate
- Aker Kværner Geo
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 201 December 2008
Fracturing of caprock
Capillary entry pressure of caprock exceeded
Migration along/across faults
Abandoned wells compromised
Wide pressure pulse and area of impact
Motivation
Many potential storage formations will have their capacity
constrained by the increase in reservoir pressure caused by
injection
In addition a number of risk factors will become more likely
with higher formation pressures:
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 301 December 2008
Motivation
EU Commission, January 2008:
“storage complex means the storage site and surrounding
geological domains which can have an effect on overall
storage integrity and security (i.e., secondary containment
formations)”
Environment Protection Agency, July 2008:
“The confining system should be of sufficient regional
thickness and lateral extent to contain the entire CO2 plume
and associated pressure front under the confining system
following the plume’s maximum lateral expansion”
Simulate reduction in peak reservoir pressure by
utilising secondary containment formations
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 401 December 2008
Injection well flow rate = 500,000 Sm3/day
(for 40yrs = 14.5 Mt total)
Choice of model
Reservoir
Caprock
Reservoir
Injection point
R = 3500 m, h = 10 m
Top of model = 750 m depth
Kv = 100 mD, Kh = 200 mD
Porosity = 0.15
Cell size = 175 x 175 x 10 m
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 501 December 2008
Model permeability
Depth
750 m
850 m
900 m
1000 m
Reservoir
(100 mD)
Caprock
(0.0005 mD)
Reservoir
(100 mD)
Migration pathway
(0.05 mD)
Injection point
Colour scheme indicates permeability
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 601 December 2008
100yrs
250yrs
500yrs
1000yrs
Top of structure @ 750 m depth
CO2 molality - injection only
Mol/kg
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 701 December 2008
CO2 molality - with brine production
100yrs
250yrs
500yrs
1000yrs
Top of structure @ 750 m depth
Mol/kg
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 801 December 2008
Top of structure @ 750 m depth
CO2 molality - with brine re-injection
250yrs
500yrs
1000yrs
100yrs Mol/kg
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 901 December 2008
Pressure(kPa)
Initial pressure
Pressure vs. time
- single cell at top of deep aquifer
Deep + shallow aquifers
- and re-injection
- with brine production
Time (yr)
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1001 December 2008
Global CO2 dissolution rates
Deep + shallow aquifers
- with brine production
- and re-injection
Pressure effects from brine production and re-injection re-align the CO2 plume,
but little net change in dissolution
Supercritical CO2
Dissolved CO2
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1101 December 2008
What happens to produced brine?
Will depend on salinity and chemical composition
Offshore
- released into the sea
Onshore
- re-circulation to shallower formations may be an option
- source of potable water if de-salination possible
- potential source of coolant to powerstations in water stressed areas
- low salinity brackish waters suitable for some agriculture purposes
(Dwarf glasswort grows well at 70 g/l of dissolved solids, and may be
useful as a crop. Plants such as barley and the date palm can tolerate
about 5 g/l)
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1201 December 2008
Conclusions
CO2 storage performance is a geosphere issue and can
benefit from using more than just one aquifer and caprock
Proposed EU legislation permits definition of a “storage
complex” with more than one storage formation
Dispersion of the pressure pulse in more than one storage
formation will limit the lateral extent of the pressure front and
decrease risk exposure
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1301 December 2008
Questions?
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1401 December 2008
Grid cell permeability in the caprock is reduced in order to simulate a
generalised CO2 migration pathway (leaky well, fault zone)
General migration pathway
1 m wide pathway @ 10mD
175m
10m
Caprock
(0.0005 mD)
1m
Caprock
(0.0005 mD)
Cell size = 175 x 175 x 10 m
Fracture size = 1x 175 x 10 m
Simple averaging gives:
((0.0005*174)+(10*1))/175 = 0.06 mD
Rounded down to 0.05 mD in model
CO2
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1501 December 2008
Sensitivity tests for grid cell size
CO2 molality
after 500 yrs
300x300x60 m
200x200x20 m 100x100x5m
300x300x15 m
Plot global rate
of disolution
to see effects
of numerical
dispersion…
© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1601 December 2008
Medium (i,j = 200m)
Fine (i,j = 100m)
Coarse (i,j = 300m)
h/v ratio = 20:1
h/v ratio = 10:1
h/v ratio = 5:1
Sensitivity tests for grid cell size
1200 x 1200 x 300m (0.432km3)
Top of model depth = 900 m
Kv = 100mD, Kh = 200 mD, Porosity = 0.15
Injection rate = 12,500 m3/day for 40yrs (0.36Mt total)
Inventory plot for global SC CO2 vs. time (yrs)
200 x 200 x 10 m
Reduced to
175 x 175 x 10 m
In model

More Related Content

Similar to Presentation_Budapest_EAGE_Sep_2008

IOR drilling technologies
IOR drilling technologiesIOR drilling technologies
IOR drilling technologiesStatoil
 
DNV GL - Bart in 't Groen
DNV GL - Bart in 't GroenDNV GL - Bart in 't Groen
DNV GL - Bart in 't GroenDutch Power
 
Environmental solutions in hydropower machines
Environmental solutions in hydropower machinesEnvironmental solutions in hydropower machines
Environmental solutions in hydropower machinesCPWF Mekong
 
Carbon capture and stoage (ccs)
Carbon capture and stoage (ccs)Carbon capture and stoage (ccs)
Carbon capture and stoage (ccs)Binshad Akhil
 
CO2 Between Disposal and Utilization
CO2 Between Disposal and UtilizationCO2 Between Disposal and Utilization
CO2 Between Disposal and UtilizationMohamed Gamal
 
Detlef Stolten at BASF Science Symposium 2015
Detlef Stolten at BASF Science Symposium 2015Detlef Stolten at BASF Science Symposium 2015
Detlef Stolten at BASF Science Symposium 2015BASF
 
Hywind - riding the next wave of renewables
Hywind - riding the next wave of renewablesHywind - riding the next wave of renewables
Hywind - riding the next wave of renewablesXynteo
 
2017 11-15 why hywind oslo exchange
2017 11-15 why hywind oslo exchange2017 11-15 why hywind oslo exchange
2017 11-15 why hywind oslo exchangeXynteo
 
Building With Nature.pptx
Building With Nature.pptxBuilding With Nature.pptx
Building With Nature.pptxMohammadFarid34
 
Water Desalination Idea
Water Desalination IdeaWater Desalination Idea
Water Desalination IdeaSead Spuzic
 
coatings-event-presentation-7-alec-gunner-twi.pdf
coatings-event-presentation-7-alec-gunner-twi.pdfcoatings-event-presentation-7-alec-gunner-twi.pdf
coatings-event-presentation-7-alec-gunner-twi.pdfkokotampan
 
The Potential for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in Indiana
The Potential for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in IndianaThe Potential for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in Indiana
The Potential for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in IndianaCristian Medina
 
Osmotic power generation(02)
Osmotic power generation(02)Osmotic power generation(02)
Osmotic power generation(02)Vatsal Patel
 
Cellular light weight concrete block CLC technology
Cellular light weight concrete block CLC technologyCellular light weight concrete block CLC technology
Cellular light weight concrete block CLC technologyNILESH AJMERA
 
Protective coating for concrete
Protective coating for concreteProtective coating for concrete
Protective coating for concreteMouayed Zeadan
 
CEMENT 071500baalbaki.ppt
CEMENT 071500baalbaki.pptCEMENT 071500baalbaki.ppt
CEMENT 071500baalbaki.pptJa Ti
 
Webinar: How to manage technical risk in CO2 capture technology development
Webinar: How to manage technical risk in CO2 capture technology developmentWebinar: How to manage technical risk in CO2 capture technology development
Webinar: How to manage technical risk in CO2 capture technology developmentGlobal CCS Institute
 
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems Pilarczyk Pres Final
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems  Pilarczyk Pres Final1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems  Pilarczyk Pres Final
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems Pilarczyk Pres FinalKrystian Pilarczyk
 

Similar to Presentation_Budapest_EAGE_Sep_2008 (20)

IOR drilling technologies
IOR drilling technologiesIOR drilling technologies
IOR drilling technologies
 
DNV GL - Bart in 't Groen
DNV GL - Bart in 't GroenDNV GL - Bart in 't Groen
DNV GL - Bart in 't Groen
 
Environmental solutions in hydropower machines
Environmental solutions in hydropower machinesEnvironmental solutions in hydropower machines
Environmental solutions in hydropower machines
 
Carbon capture and stoage (ccs)
Carbon capture and stoage (ccs)Carbon capture and stoage (ccs)
Carbon capture and stoage (ccs)
 
CO2 Between Disposal and Utilization
CO2 Between Disposal and UtilizationCO2 Between Disposal and Utilization
CO2 Between Disposal and Utilization
 
Detlef Stolten at BASF Science Symposium 2015
Detlef Stolten at BASF Science Symposium 2015Detlef Stolten at BASF Science Symposium 2015
Detlef Stolten at BASF Science Symposium 2015
 
Hywind - riding the next wave of renewables
Hywind - riding the next wave of renewablesHywind - riding the next wave of renewables
Hywind - riding the next wave of renewables
 
2017 11-15 why hywind oslo exchange
2017 11-15 why hywind oslo exchange2017 11-15 why hywind oslo exchange
2017 11-15 why hywind oslo exchange
 
Arthur lee ccs_needs_challenges
Arthur lee ccs_needs_challengesArthur lee ccs_needs_challenges
Arthur lee ccs_needs_challenges
 
Carbon Dioxide Storage: a UK perspective - Andy Chadwick, BGS, at the UKCCSRC...
Carbon Dioxide Storage: a UK perspective - Andy Chadwick, BGS, at the UKCCSRC...Carbon Dioxide Storage: a UK perspective - Andy Chadwick, BGS, at the UKCCSRC...
Carbon Dioxide Storage: a UK perspective - Andy Chadwick, BGS, at the UKCCSRC...
 
Building With Nature.pptx
Building With Nature.pptxBuilding With Nature.pptx
Building With Nature.pptx
 
Water Desalination Idea
Water Desalination IdeaWater Desalination Idea
Water Desalination Idea
 
coatings-event-presentation-7-alec-gunner-twi.pdf
coatings-event-presentation-7-alec-gunner-twi.pdfcoatings-event-presentation-7-alec-gunner-twi.pdf
coatings-event-presentation-7-alec-gunner-twi.pdf
 
The Potential for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in Indiana
The Potential for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in IndianaThe Potential for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in Indiana
The Potential for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in Indiana
 
Osmotic power generation(02)
Osmotic power generation(02)Osmotic power generation(02)
Osmotic power generation(02)
 
Cellular light weight concrete block CLC technology
Cellular light weight concrete block CLC technologyCellular light weight concrete block CLC technology
Cellular light weight concrete block CLC technology
 
Protective coating for concrete
Protective coating for concreteProtective coating for concrete
Protective coating for concrete
 
CEMENT 071500baalbaki.ppt
CEMENT 071500baalbaki.pptCEMENT 071500baalbaki.ppt
CEMENT 071500baalbaki.ppt
 
Webinar: How to manage technical risk in CO2 capture technology development
Webinar: How to manage technical risk in CO2 capture technology developmentWebinar: How to manage technical risk in CO2 capture technology development
Webinar: How to manage technical risk in CO2 capture technology development
 
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems Pilarczyk Pres Final
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems  Pilarczyk Pres Final1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems  Pilarczyk Pres Final
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems Pilarczyk Pres Final
 

Presentation_Budapest_EAGE_Sep_2008

  • 1. Managing over-pressure in deep saline aquifer storage of CO2 Mike Carpenter, Todd Flach, Semere Solomon (DNV) Terje Aurdal (Aker Kværner Geo) EAGE, September 2008 We gratefully acknowledge support for this work from: - NFR CLIMIT - DNV Corporate - Aker Kværner Geo
  • 2. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 201 December 2008 Fracturing of caprock Capillary entry pressure of caprock exceeded Migration along/across faults Abandoned wells compromised Wide pressure pulse and area of impact Motivation Many potential storage formations will have their capacity constrained by the increase in reservoir pressure caused by injection In addition a number of risk factors will become more likely with higher formation pressures:
  • 3. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 301 December 2008 Motivation EU Commission, January 2008: “storage complex means the storage site and surrounding geological domains which can have an effect on overall storage integrity and security (i.e., secondary containment formations)” Environment Protection Agency, July 2008: “The confining system should be of sufficient regional thickness and lateral extent to contain the entire CO2 plume and associated pressure front under the confining system following the plume’s maximum lateral expansion” Simulate reduction in peak reservoir pressure by utilising secondary containment formations
  • 4. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 401 December 2008 Injection well flow rate = 500,000 Sm3/day (for 40yrs = 14.5 Mt total) Choice of model Reservoir Caprock Reservoir Injection point R = 3500 m, h = 10 m Top of model = 750 m depth Kv = 100 mD, Kh = 200 mD Porosity = 0.15 Cell size = 175 x 175 x 10 m
  • 5. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 501 December 2008 Model permeability Depth 750 m 850 m 900 m 1000 m Reservoir (100 mD) Caprock (0.0005 mD) Reservoir (100 mD) Migration pathway (0.05 mD) Injection point Colour scheme indicates permeability
  • 6. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 601 December 2008 100yrs 250yrs 500yrs 1000yrs Top of structure @ 750 m depth CO2 molality - injection only Mol/kg
  • 7. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 701 December 2008 CO2 molality - with brine production 100yrs 250yrs 500yrs 1000yrs Top of structure @ 750 m depth Mol/kg
  • 8. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 801 December 2008 Top of structure @ 750 m depth CO2 molality - with brine re-injection 250yrs 500yrs 1000yrs 100yrs Mol/kg
  • 9. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 901 December 2008 Pressure(kPa) Initial pressure Pressure vs. time - single cell at top of deep aquifer Deep + shallow aquifers - and re-injection - with brine production Time (yr)
  • 10. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1001 December 2008 Global CO2 dissolution rates Deep + shallow aquifers - with brine production - and re-injection Pressure effects from brine production and re-injection re-align the CO2 plume, but little net change in dissolution Supercritical CO2 Dissolved CO2
  • 11. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1101 December 2008 What happens to produced brine? Will depend on salinity and chemical composition Offshore - released into the sea Onshore - re-circulation to shallower formations may be an option - source of potable water if de-salination possible - potential source of coolant to powerstations in water stressed areas - low salinity brackish waters suitable for some agriculture purposes (Dwarf glasswort grows well at 70 g/l of dissolved solids, and may be useful as a crop. Plants such as barley and the date palm can tolerate about 5 g/l)
  • 12. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1201 December 2008 Conclusions CO2 storage performance is a geosphere issue and can benefit from using more than just one aquifer and caprock Proposed EU legislation permits definition of a “storage complex” with more than one storage formation Dispersion of the pressure pulse in more than one storage formation will limit the lateral extent of the pressure front and decrease risk exposure
  • 13. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1301 December 2008 Questions?
  • 14. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1401 December 2008 Grid cell permeability in the caprock is reduced in order to simulate a generalised CO2 migration pathway (leaky well, fault zone) General migration pathway 1 m wide pathway @ 10mD 175m 10m Caprock (0.0005 mD) 1m Caprock (0.0005 mD) Cell size = 175 x 175 x 10 m Fracture size = 1x 175 x 10 m Simple averaging gives: ((0.0005*174)+(10*1))/175 = 0.06 mD Rounded down to 0.05 mD in model CO2
  • 15. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1501 December 2008 Sensitivity tests for grid cell size CO2 molality after 500 yrs 300x300x60 m 200x200x20 m 100x100x5m 300x300x15 m Plot global rate of disolution to see effects of numerical dispersion…
  • 16. © Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved Slide 1601 December 2008 Medium (i,j = 200m) Fine (i,j = 100m) Coarse (i,j = 300m) h/v ratio = 20:1 h/v ratio = 10:1 h/v ratio = 5:1 Sensitivity tests for grid cell size 1200 x 1200 x 300m (0.432km3) Top of model depth = 900 m Kv = 100mD, Kh = 200 mD, Porosity = 0.15 Injection rate = 12,500 m3/day for 40yrs (0.36Mt total) Inventory plot for global SC CO2 vs. time (yrs) 200 x 200 x 10 m Reduced to 175 x 175 x 10 m In model