The document discusses the challenges of predicting drug success based on preclinical data and high attrition rates in drug development. It argues that improving predictability, which is determined by the predictivity of efficacy, safety and compound properties, could significantly lower attrition. However, understanding of these predictivities is currently limited. Coordinated efforts across the industry are needed to better quantify predictivities, standardize methods and data collection, and apply systems modeling approaches to improve prediction and lower attrition in drug development.
Evidence Based Practice and Finding the Information You Need
Pharmaceutical Predictivity and Drug Development Attrition
1. Does Pharmaceutical Predictivity Translate To Productivity in Drug Development? If So, How? Thorir D. Bjornsson, MD, PhD Saint Davids, Pennsylvania May-2010
2. The Art of Making Predictions “ It’s hard to make predictions, especially about the future.” Lawrence Peter Berra ("Yogi" Berra) American Baseball Legend (born 1925)
3.
4. From Preclinical to Clinical Development Discovery & Preclinical Efficacy Safety Compound Properties Efficacy Safety Compound Properties Clinical Development DATA DATA PLANNING
5.
6.
7.
8. Clinical Development Plans Discovery & Preclinical Efficacy Safety Compound Properties Efficacy Safety Compound Properties Clinical Development PREDICTIVITY DATA DATA
9.
10.
11. Attrition is a Key Challenge Attrition Rates Vary Depending on Different Attributes Vary by therapeutic areas Vary by phase of development Vary depending on targets Small Molecules > Biopharmaceuticals > Vaccines
12. 90 - 95% Average attrition rate across the industry Rate of Attrition: Unacceptably High
13. Compound Terminations Clinical safety Lack of efficacy Formulation PK/bioavailability Commercial Toxicology Cost of goods Unknown/other Kola & Landis, Nature Review Drug Discovery, 3:711-715, 2004 Commonly Cited Causes
14. Attrition Categories* Scientific Reasons Technical Reasons Commercial Reasons Regulatory Reasons Preclinical and Clinical Efficacy Preclinical and Clinical Safety Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacokinetics Bioavailability Formulation Issues Patent Issues Cost of Goods Budget/Resource Constraints Portfolio Rationalization Potential Value Regulatory Hurdles Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Decisions * CMR Categories
15. Fundamental Causes of Termination (Scientific) Bjornsson et al., Pharmaceutical Predictivity (msc), 2010 * Compound properties are defined as determinants and descriptors of acceptable exposure, including variability and time course Efficacy Safety Compound Properties*
16.
17. Need For New Designs “ When things aren’t working the way they should be, you have the makings of a great design project.” Bruce Mau, design thinker
18. Pharmaceutical Predictivity P T = (1 – A T ) p i = [1 – (a i x A T )] P T = p e x p s x p c Just a Few Equations ….. Total predictivity, P T , is derived from total attrition, A T Total predictivity equals the product of the individual three key predictivities, ie, of efficacy, safety and compound properties, p e , p s and p c , respectively, and assumes these are independent of each other Each individual predictivity, p i , is related to the proportion of that attrition, a i, relative to total attrition Bjornsson et al., Pharmaceutical Predictivity (msc), 2010
19. Pharmaceutical Predictivity P T = p e x p s x p c Scientific Determinants of Success Rates What Do We Know About These Individual Predictivities?
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26. Examples of different likelihoods of success depending on different mix of predictivities of efficacy, safety and compound properties in man Pharmaceutical Predictivity Is this what we are talking about on average ? Maybe, but need data 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.050 (5.0%) 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.108 (10.8%) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.125 (12.5%) 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.30 (30.0%) p c p s p e P T
32. A Quote on Predictivity “ No branch of science can be called truly mature until it has developed some form of predictive capability.” Sir Peter Medawar (1915 - 1987) Nobel Laureate in Physiology and Medicine, 1960
Editor's Notes
Candidate Attrition Rates Very High Attrition rates typically measured from candidate declaration to commercial launch Attrition rates average 90% (1:10) - 95% (1:20) across the industry Attrition Rates Vary Across Different Therapeutic Areas* Highest attrition rates for CNS, Oncology, Urology, Women’s Health Medium attrition rates for Metabolic Diseases, Ophthalmology Lowest attrition rates for Arthritis/Pain, Cardiovascular, Infectious Disease Attrition Rates Vary by Phase of Drug Development Highest attrition rates during Phase 2, similar for Phase 1 and Phase 3 Causes of Termination Vary Depending of Phase of Development Safety/Compound Properties dominate in Phase 0 and Phase 1 Efficacy dominates in Phase 2 and Phase 3 Attrition Rates Vary Depending on Targets Highest attrition rates for new and untested target
where scientific reasons include preclinical and clinical efficacy, preclinical and clinical safety, preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics and bioavailability, and benefit to risk ratio; technical reasons include formulation and patent issues; commercial reasons include cost of goods, budget/resource constraints, portfolio rationalization and potential value; and regulatory reasons include regulatory hurdles and decisions.
where scientific reasons include preclinical and clinical efficacy, preclinical and clinical safety, preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics and bioavailability, and benefit to risk ratio; technical reasons include formulation and patent issues; commercial reasons include cost of goods, budget/resource constraints, portfolio rationalization and potential value; and regulatory reasons include regulatory hurdles and decisions.