Top line: The first time we use ASC we should also spell it out: Adult Social Care (ASC). Second par, third sentence: Too many ‘ands’. Change to read: We can deliver this alongside substantial cash savings for health and social care partners and enabling the redirection of valuable resources.
Top line, third bullet: service user, change to read: service users The challenges, 6 th bullet: FACS? Should this be spelt out?
Delete the arrow from the top line (not consistent with other pages) Not keen on the underline on the words underneath the Integrated Services column
Again, remove arrow from topline. Top line, first paragraph: high cost, should be hyphenated? high-cost The traditional solution, first paragraph: high-cost? The traditional solution, second paragraph: dependant – change to read dependent (has a different meaning)
A new way of working, second paragraph: Reablment, change to read Reablement A new way of working, third paragraph: change to read: ...enables the engagement of service users, including those with complex needs, and frontline staff in the process of change. A new way of working, fourth paragraph: dependant – dependent The benefits for councils, first bullet: CSED?
Care community: business or businesses? Reach: hard to reach is hyphenated elsewhere in the document, decide which way we want to go and make it consistent Values Modes: Reablement is capitalised elsewhere in the document, again decide which style we want to use and stick with it
Remove arrow from top line Fourth bullet: too many ‘ands’. Change to read: Organisational culture, staff engagement and training... Final bullet: remove full-stop from end, not consistent
Outcomes column: again not keen on the underline
Topline, first paragraph: targeting or and a target?
TCC or The Campaign Company? Inconsistency with this slide and the rest of the document where it mentions us. We just need to decide which one we are, and stick to it! Same re: Reablement or Reablement