SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
BY THABO LESETLHE
14001578
INTRODUCTION
The Italian 58m long, 14 500 metric tonnes Tower Of Pisa was constructed from 1173-1370 (197 years). Its purpose was to
house the bells of the cathedral of the Piazza dei Miracoli. Just after the construction of its first three levels, a slight tilt was
noticed, and from this moment on, the Tower had begun to lean southward at the rate of about 1.2 mm per year (from 1360-
1370). It has been found that about 10,000 years ago, in the location of the Tower was a river estuary (Arno River), hence the
place constitutes deposits of layers of soft sand, clay and silt. Its largest angle of tilt was 5.50 by 1990. Its uneven settling posed
a hazard to the public and surrounding structures and hence closed from public use until May 2001.
GROUND PROFILE UNDER THE TOWER OF PISA
These layers are underbedded by a stiff sand called C1 in horizon C that can be
treated as a natural boundary. More detailed information about the subsoil in
Pisa is given by Calabresi (1996).
CAUSE OF THE LEANING
The Leaning of the Tower of Pisa is due primarily to the location of the tower on the unstable ground underneath
the foundation which led to its differential or uneven settling over time. The weight of the tower compressed the
ground beneath beginning with 7 meters layer of silt and 30 meters of clay under the foundation. The reason the
Tower tilts southward is because the soil under the south side of the tower is more compressible or softer than on
the north side. Due to the creep deformation of clays deposited in the form of unevenly distributed lenses in the
sandy base, the tower settled and tilted to one side. Further depression of the clay below the foundation is a result
of consolidation.
3D CREEPANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENTIAL SETTLING OF THE TOWER
FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION
FROM 1173 TO 1178
Average foundation pressure = 323 kPa,
Maximum excess pore pressure = 74 kPa,
Average settlement = 46 cm, The resulting
inclination = 0.22° .
After the 94 years of construction pause up to
1272. Further deformations took place due to
pure creep under constant effective stresses;
Average settlement = 1.25, Computed
inclination = 0.38°.
SECOND PHASE OF
CONSTRUCTION FROM 1272 TO
1278
Average foundation pressure = 473 kPa,
Average settlement = 1.74 m, The inclination
was computed to be 1.05°. After a long
construction pause of 82 years up to 1360,
there was a; Computed average settlement of
2.55 m and an inclination of 2.62°.
• A.G.I. (1991), The leaning tower of Pisa – Present situation, In A.G.I. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th ECSMFE, Volume 4: 1437-144, Florence, A.A. Balkema
• Berardi, G., Caroti, L., Giunta, G., Jamiolkoeski, M. & Lancellotta, R. (1991), Mechanical properties of Upper Pisa Clay, In A.G.I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th ECSMFE, Volume 1: 7-10, Florence, A.A. Balkema
• Brinkgreve, R.B.J. & Vermeer, P.A. (Eds.) (1998), PLAXIS Finite Element Code for Soil and Rock Analyses, Version 7, A.A. Balkema
• Burland, J.B. & Potts, D.M. (1994), Development and application of a numerical model for the leaning tower of Pisa, In Shibuya, S., Mitachi, T. & Miura, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of 1st Int. Conf. on Pre-failure Deformation of Geomaterials, Volume 2: 715-738, Sapporo, A.A. Balkema
• Calabresi G., Rampello S. and Callisto L. (1993), The Leaning Tower of Pisa: Geotechnical Characterisation of the Tower´s Subsoil within the Framework of Critical State Theory, Università degli studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale e Geotecnica, Studi e Ricerche 1/93-2/93
THIRD CONSTRUCTION PHASE (BELL CHAMBER)
FROM 1360 TO 1370
Average foundation pressure is 496 kPa, the average
settlement is 2.60 m and the inclination of the tower is
computed to be 2.81°.
This 3D creep model shows
excess pore pressures
directly after the end of the
construction of the bell
chamber. The red zone has a
maximum excess pore
pressure of 3 kPa; the
average settlement is 2.60
m; the inclination is 2.81°.
This model shows
excess pore pressure
at the end of the first
construction phase.
The red zone has a
maximum excess pore
pressure of 74 kPa;
the average
settlement is 0.46 m;
the inclination is
0.22°.
This 3D creep model
shows excess pore
pressure at the end
of the second
construction phase.
The red zone has a
maximum excess
pore pressure of 59
kPa; the average
settlement is 1.74 m;
the inclination is
1.05°.
These two 3D creep models below shows an
increase of the vertical stress on the south side
with progression of the uneven settling. The left
picture shows the stress distribution of the
vertical stress just after the construction of the
bell chamber in 1370, whereas the right one
reflects the stress distribution in the year 1838.
Both pictures are plotted in the same scale. With
progressing uneven settling the vertical stresses
increase in the south and decrease in the north.
LOCATION OF THE TOWER
PICTURES OF THE TOWER IN ITS LEANING POSITION
This 3D creep model represents a true
scale geometry of the tower in the year
1993.Inclination is 5.02° and the average
settlement is 3.22 m. The red colour
represents an area where the shear
strength of the subsoil is completely
exhausted. This typically happens in the
relative stiff sand layers. The large
deformations of the silt layer also create
zones in a fully plastic state of stress
The main human effort that become more
successful in trying to rescue the tower was
removing of the soil (38 m3) under the North side
of the foundation during 1998-1999, by drilling
41 inclined holes of maximum penetration of 2m
below the foundation 0.5 m spacing, which
reduced the tilt by 44cm thus 0.50 by 2001 This
did work out because the removed volume of soil
compensated for the clay lenses within the sand
layers on the south side of the foundation which
led to the differential settling.
SOUT
H SIDE
SOUTH

More Related Content

What's hot

Unit 1 sheet pile-converted
Unit 1   sheet pile-convertedUnit 1   sheet pile-converted
Unit 1 sheet pile-convertedNigitha rajan
 
Prediction of Surface Subsidence and Its Monitoring
Prediction of Surface Subsidence and Its MonitoringPrediction of Surface Subsidence and Its Monitoring
Prediction of Surface Subsidence and Its MonitoringVR M
 
Braced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavationBraced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavationYogesh Pandey
 
Seismic ssi effects and liquification
Seismic ssi effects and liquificationSeismic ssi effects and liquification
Seismic ssi effects and liquificationArpan Banerjee
 
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE STRUCTURE
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE STRUCTUREEARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE STRUCTURE
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE STRUCTUREguruvignesh N
 
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)Irfan Malik
 
4.0 bearing capacity shallow foundations
4.0 bearing capacity shallow foundations4.0 bearing capacity shallow foundations
4.0 bearing capacity shallow foundationsRakesh Reddy
 
Soil structure interaction amec presentation-final
Soil structure interaction amec presentation-finalSoil structure interaction amec presentation-final
Soil structure interaction amec presentation-finalAhmad Hallak PEng
 
Lateral Earth Pressure
Lateral Earth PressureLateral Earth Pressure
Lateral Earth PressureFast-NU Lahore
 
Soil arching in granular soil
Soil arching in granular soilSoil arching in granular soil
Soil arching in granular soilJithu G Francis
 
Construction of Buildings in seismic areas
Construction of Buildings in seismic areasConstruction of Buildings in seismic areas
Construction of Buildings in seismic areasTarun kumar
 
Is codes related to earthquake
Is codes related to earthquakeIs codes related to earthquake
Is codes related to earthquakeNeeraj Chourasia
 
Lateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharma
Lateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharmaLateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharma
Lateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharmaABHISHEK SHARMA
 
The Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded Frame
The Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded FrameThe Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded Frame
The Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded FrameIJERD Editor
 
1 4-landslide-120325013259-phpapp02
1 4-landslide-120325013259-phpapp021 4-landslide-120325013259-phpapp02
1 4-landslide-120325013259-phpapp02Sudalai Muthu
 

What's hot (19)

Unit 1 sheet pile-converted
Unit 1   sheet pile-convertedUnit 1   sheet pile-converted
Unit 1 sheet pile-converted
 
Prediction of Surface Subsidence and Its Monitoring
Prediction of Surface Subsidence and Its MonitoringPrediction of Surface Subsidence and Its Monitoring
Prediction of Surface Subsidence and Its Monitoring
 
Braced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavationBraced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavation
 
Msb4pp a4design07
Msb4pp a4design07Msb4pp a4design07
Msb4pp a4design07
 
Seismic ssi effects and liquification
Seismic ssi effects and liquificationSeismic ssi effects and liquification
Seismic ssi effects and liquification
 
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE STRUCTURE
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE STRUCTUREEARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE STRUCTURE
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE STRUCTURE
 
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)
 
4.0 bearing capacity shallow foundations
4.0 bearing capacity shallow foundations4.0 bearing capacity shallow foundations
4.0 bearing capacity shallow foundations
 
Soil structure interaction amec presentation-final
Soil structure interaction amec presentation-finalSoil structure interaction amec presentation-final
Soil structure interaction amec presentation-final
 
Lateral Earth Pressure
Lateral Earth PressureLateral Earth Pressure
Lateral Earth Pressure
 
SHALLOW FOUNDATION
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONSHALLOW FOUNDATION
SHALLOW FOUNDATION
 
Soil arching in granular soil
Soil arching in granular soilSoil arching in granular soil
Soil arching in granular soil
 
Construction of Buildings in seismic areas
Construction of Buildings in seismic areasConstruction of Buildings in seismic areas
Construction of Buildings in seismic areas
 
Is codes related to earthquake
Is codes related to earthquakeIs codes related to earthquake
Is codes related to earthquake
 
Lateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharma
Lateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharmaLateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharma
Lateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharma
 
The Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded Frame
The Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded FrameThe Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded Frame
The Effect of Structure -Soil Interaction on Eccentrically Loaded Frame
 
Subsidence
SubsidenceSubsidence
Subsidence
 
Seismic Design Basics - Superstructure
Seismic Design Basics - SuperstructureSeismic Design Basics - Superstructure
Seismic Design Basics - Superstructure
 
1 4-landslide-120325013259-phpapp02
1 4-landslide-120325013259-phpapp021 4-landslide-120325013259-phpapp02
1 4-landslide-120325013259-phpapp02
 

Similar to LESETLHE 14001578

Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]
Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]
Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]farrukh choksi
 
Research paper of leaning tower of pisa
Research paper of leaning tower of pisaResearch paper of leaning tower of pisa
Research paper of leaning tower of pisaRushabh shah
 
Geo trans2004 pecker
Geo trans2004 peckerGeo trans2004 pecker
Geo trans2004 peckergefyra-rion
 
Leaning Tower of Pisa
Leaning Tower of PisaLeaning Tower of Pisa
Leaning Tower of PisaDheeraj Kumar
 
Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...
Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...
Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...IRJET Journal
 
INFLUENCE OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON RESPONSE OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDI...
INFLUENCE OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON RESPONSE OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDI...INFLUENCE OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON RESPONSE OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDI...
INFLUENCE OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON RESPONSE OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDI...SJ BASHA
 
Lecture 2 3 Compression, Condition Assess
Lecture 2 3 Compression, Condition AssessLecture 2 3 Compression, Condition Assess
Lecture 2 3 Compression, Condition AssessTeja Ande
 
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...IRJET Journal
 
scribfree.com_on-earthquake-resistant-structures.pptx
scribfree.com_on-earthquake-resistant-structures.pptxscribfree.com_on-earthquake-resistant-structures.pptx
scribfree.com_on-earthquake-resistant-structures.pptxaps ratnuchak
 
Leaning Tower of Pisa.pptx
Leaning Tower of Pisa.pptxLeaning Tower of Pisa.pptx
Leaning Tower of Pisa.pptxVISHVACHAUDHARY2
 
Analysis and Design Aspects of Support Measures of Main Caverns of Karuma Hyd...
Analysis and Design Aspects of Support Measures of Main Caverns of Karuma Hyd...Analysis and Design Aspects of Support Measures of Main Caverns of Karuma Hyd...
Analysis and Design Aspects of Support Measures of Main Caverns of Karuma Hyd...IOSRJMCE
 
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frameElastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frameNayan Kumar Dutta
 

Similar to LESETLHE 14001578 (20)

Pisaaaa
PisaaaaPisaaaa
Pisaaaa
 
Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]
Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]
Case Study Of Stone Structure [Pyramid Of Giza]
 
Research paper of leaning tower of pisa
Research paper of leaning tower of pisaResearch paper of leaning tower of pisa
Research paper of leaning tower of pisa
 
Pisa
PisaPisa
Pisa
 
Pisa
PisaPisa
Pisa
 
Pisa
PisaPisa
Pisa
 
Pisa Tower
Pisa TowerPisa Tower
Pisa Tower
 
Geo trans2004 pecker
Geo trans2004 peckerGeo trans2004 pecker
Geo trans2004 pecker
 
Leaning Tower of Pisa
Leaning Tower of PisaLeaning Tower of Pisa
Leaning Tower of Pisa
 
Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...
Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...
Comparative and Parametric Study of Hillside Gateway Project of Irregular Str...
 
INFLUENCE OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON RESPONSE OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDI...
INFLUENCE OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON RESPONSE OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDI...INFLUENCE OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON RESPONSE OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDI...
INFLUENCE OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON RESPONSE OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDI...
 
pile wall
pile wallpile wall
pile wall
 
Lecture 2 3 Compression, Condition Assess
Lecture 2 3 Compression, Condition AssessLecture 2 3 Compression, Condition Assess
Lecture 2 3 Compression, Condition Assess
 
Liquefaction of Soil
Liquefaction of SoilLiquefaction of Soil
Liquefaction of Soil
 
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
Soil Structure Interaction Effect for A Building Resting on Sloping Ground In...
 
scribfree.com_on-earthquake-resistant-structures.pptx
scribfree.com_on-earthquake-resistant-structures.pptxscribfree.com_on-earthquake-resistant-structures.pptx
scribfree.com_on-earthquake-resistant-structures.pptx
 
Leaning Tower of Pisa.pptx
Leaning Tower of Pisa.pptxLeaning Tower of Pisa.pptx
Leaning Tower of Pisa.pptx
 
Analysis and Design Aspects of Support Measures of Main Caverns of Karuma Hyd...
Analysis and Design Aspects of Support Measures of Main Caverns of Karuma Hyd...Analysis and Design Aspects of Support Measures of Main Caverns of Karuma Hyd...
Analysis and Design Aspects of Support Measures of Main Caverns of Karuma Hyd...
 
J1303016066
J1303016066J1303016066
J1303016066
 
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frameElastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
 

LESETLHE 14001578

  • 1. BY THABO LESETLHE 14001578 INTRODUCTION The Italian 58m long, 14 500 metric tonnes Tower Of Pisa was constructed from 1173-1370 (197 years). Its purpose was to house the bells of the cathedral of the Piazza dei Miracoli. Just after the construction of its first three levels, a slight tilt was noticed, and from this moment on, the Tower had begun to lean southward at the rate of about 1.2 mm per year (from 1360- 1370). It has been found that about 10,000 years ago, in the location of the Tower was a river estuary (Arno River), hence the place constitutes deposits of layers of soft sand, clay and silt. Its largest angle of tilt was 5.50 by 1990. Its uneven settling posed a hazard to the public and surrounding structures and hence closed from public use until May 2001. GROUND PROFILE UNDER THE TOWER OF PISA These layers are underbedded by a stiff sand called C1 in horizon C that can be treated as a natural boundary. More detailed information about the subsoil in Pisa is given by Calabresi (1996). CAUSE OF THE LEANING The Leaning of the Tower of Pisa is due primarily to the location of the tower on the unstable ground underneath the foundation which led to its differential or uneven settling over time. The weight of the tower compressed the ground beneath beginning with 7 meters layer of silt and 30 meters of clay under the foundation. The reason the Tower tilts southward is because the soil under the south side of the tower is more compressible or softer than on the north side. Due to the creep deformation of clays deposited in the form of unevenly distributed lenses in the sandy base, the tower settled and tilted to one side. Further depression of the clay below the foundation is a result of consolidation. 3D CREEPANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENTIAL SETTLING OF THE TOWER FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION FROM 1173 TO 1178 Average foundation pressure = 323 kPa, Maximum excess pore pressure = 74 kPa, Average settlement = 46 cm, The resulting inclination = 0.22° . After the 94 years of construction pause up to 1272. Further deformations took place due to pure creep under constant effective stresses; Average settlement = 1.25, Computed inclination = 0.38°. SECOND PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION FROM 1272 TO 1278 Average foundation pressure = 473 kPa, Average settlement = 1.74 m, The inclination was computed to be 1.05°. After a long construction pause of 82 years up to 1360, there was a; Computed average settlement of 2.55 m and an inclination of 2.62°. • A.G.I. (1991), The leaning tower of Pisa – Present situation, In A.G.I. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th ECSMFE, Volume 4: 1437-144, Florence, A.A. Balkema • Berardi, G., Caroti, L., Giunta, G., Jamiolkoeski, M. & Lancellotta, R. (1991), Mechanical properties of Upper Pisa Clay, In A.G.I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th ECSMFE, Volume 1: 7-10, Florence, A.A. Balkema • Brinkgreve, R.B.J. & Vermeer, P.A. (Eds.) (1998), PLAXIS Finite Element Code for Soil and Rock Analyses, Version 7, A.A. Balkema • Burland, J.B. & Potts, D.M. (1994), Development and application of a numerical model for the leaning tower of Pisa, In Shibuya, S., Mitachi, T. & Miura, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of 1st Int. Conf. on Pre-failure Deformation of Geomaterials, Volume 2: 715-738, Sapporo, A.A. Balkema • Calabresi G., Rampello S. and Callisto L. (1993), The Leaning Tower of Pisa: Geotechnical Characterisation of the Tower´s Subsoil within the Framework of Critical State Theory, Università degli studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale e Geotecnica, Studi e Ricerche 1/93-2/93 THIRD CONSTRUCTION PHASE (BELL CHAMBER) FROM 1360 TO 1370 Average foundation pressure is 496 kPa, the average settlement is 2.60 m and the inclination of the tower is computed to be 2.81°. This 3D creep model shows excess pore pressures directly after the end of the construction of the bell chamber. The red zone has a maximum excess pore pressure of 3 kPa; the average settlement is 2.60 m; the inclination is 2.81°. This model shows excess pore pressure at the end of the first construction phase. The red zone has a maximum excess pore pressure of 74 kPa; the average settlement is 0.46 m; the inclination is 0.22°. This 3D creep model shows excess pore pressure at the end of the second construction phase. The red zone has a maximum excess pore pressure of 59 kPa; the average settlement is 1.74 m; the inclination is 1.05°. These two 3D creep models below shows an increase of the vertical stress on the south side with progression of the uneven settling. The left picture shows the stress distribution of the vertical stress just after the construction of the bell chamber in 1370, whereas the right one reflects the stress distribution in the year 1838. Both pictures are plotted in the same scale. With progressing uneven settling the vertical stresses increase in the south and decrease in the north. LOCATION OF THE TOWER PICTURES OF THE TOWER IN ITS LEANING POSITION This 3D creep model represents a true scale geometry of the tower in the year 1993.Inclination is 5.02° and the average settlement is 3.22 m. The red colour represents an area where the shear strength of the subsoil is completely exhausted. This typically happens in the relative stiff sand layers. The large deformations of the silt layer also create zones in a fully plastic state of stress The main human effort that become more successful in trying to rescue the tower was removing of the soil (38 m3) under the North side of the foundation during 1998-1999, by drilling 41 inclined holes of maximum penetration of 2m below the foundation 0.5 m spacing, which reduced the tilt by 44cm thus 0.50 by 2001 This did work out because the removed volume of soil compensated for the clay lenses within the sand layers on the south side of the foundation which led to the differential settling. SOUT H SIDE SOUTH