2. Epidemiological research
Need
Definition of what is to be measured
Clear and precise
Valid
Acceptable and applicable for large population
Establishment of criteria and standards by
which it can be measured
3. Measurements in epidemiology
Mortality
Morbidity
Disability
Presence or absence or distribution of
characteristics
Demographic variables
5. Tools of measurement
Disease magnitude is often expressed in
terms of
Rates
Ratios
Proportions
6. Rate
A rate measures the occurrence of some
particular event in a population during a given
time period
It is a statement of the risk of developing a
condition
It indicates the change in some event in a
given population over a period of time
7. Rate
Expressed as
Rate = number of event /population in that time
period× 1000
Eg – death rate, birth rate
Elements in a “rate”
Numerator
Denominator
Time specification
Multiplier
8. Rate
Types
Crude rates (Unstandardized rates) – birth rate
, death rate
Specific rates – (Due to specific cause or
occurring in specific groups or in specific time
periods) – MMR, IMR
Standardized rates (obtained by direct or
indirect method of standardization)- age and
sex standardized rated
9. Ratios
Expresses a relation in size between two
random quantities
The numerator is not a component of the
denominator
X: Y = X/Y
Eg- doctor-population ratio, male – female
ratio
10. Proportion
A proportion is a ratio which indicates the
relation in magnitude of a part of the whole
The numerator is always included in the
denominator
Always expressed in terms of percentage
Eg- IQ
11. Incidence
The number of new cases occurring in a
defined population in a specified period of
time
Incidence = Number of new cases/ population
at risk (during the defined period) × 1000
12. Prevalence
The term disease prevalence refers to all
current cases (old and new) existing at a
given point of time or over a period of time in
a given population
Although referred as rate, it is a ratio
Two types
Point prevalence
Period prevalence
13. Relation between incidence and
prevalence
Prevalence = Incidence X Duration
Longer is the duration of the disease, greater
is the prevalence
Disease of acute onset or with rapid recovery
or death and short duration is associated with
low prevalence
14. Evaluation of screening test
Screening test result by diagnosis
Sensitivity = proportion of positives that are correctly
identified by a test = probability of a positive test, given
the patient is ill.
Specificity = proportion of negatives that are
correctly identified by a test = probability of a negative
test, given that patient is well.
Positive predictive value is the proportion of patients
with positive test results who are correctly diagnosed.
Negative predictive value is the proportion of
patients with negative test results who are correctly
diagnosed.
16. Screening
test results
Diagnosis Total
Diseased Not diseased
Positive True positive
(a)
False positive
(b)
a+b
Negative False negative
(c)
True negative
(d)
c+d
Total a+ c b+d a+b+c+d
Sensitivity = a/(a+c)× 100
Specificity = d/(b+d)× 100
Positive predictive value = a/(a+b)× 100
Negative predictive value = d/(c+d)× 100
17. Sensitivity
The term was introduced by – Yerushalmy in
1940s as a statistical index of diagnostic
accuracy
Definition – the ability of a test to identify
correctly all those who have a disease (true
positive)
18. Specificity
Definition – the ability of the test to identify
correctly those who do not have the disease
(true negative)
19. An ideal screening test should be 100 percent
sensitive and 100 percent specific, this
seldom occurs
20. Predictive value
Performance of a screening test is measured
by its “predictive value”
It reflects the diagnostic power of the test
Predictive accuracy depends upon –
Sensitivity
Specificity
Disease prevalence
21. Predictive value
Predictive value of a positive test – indicates
the probability that a patient with a positive
test result has, in fact disease in question
More prevalent a disease – more accurate will
be the predictive value of a positive screening
test
Predictive value of a positive result falls as
prevalence declines