4. Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Project Overview 1
1.2 Legislative Requirements 1
1.3 Purpose of this Report 1
2 Project Description 2
3 Methodology 3
4 Air Quality 5
4.1 Baseline Information 5
4.2 Potential Impacts 5
5 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 6
5.1 Baseline Information 6
5.2 Potential Impacts 6
6 Contaminated Land 7
6.1 Baseline Information 7
6.2 Potential Impacts 7
7 Ecology 8
7.1 Baseline Information 8
7.2 Potential Impacts 9
8 Landscape and Visual Amenity 11
8.1 Baseline Information 11
8.2 Potential Impacts 11
9 Materials and Waste 12
9.1 Baseline Information 12
9.2 Potential Impacts 12
10 Noise and Vibration 13
10.1 Baseline Information 13
10.2 Potential Impacts 13
11 Water 14
11.1 Baseline Information 14
11.2 Potential Impacts 14
12 Conclusion 16
Figure 1 Site Location Plan
Figure 2 Proposed Development
Figure 3 Environmental Features Map
5. Appendix A Tinsley Chord EIA Screening Report
Appendix B Sheffield Tram Train Preliminary Ecological Appraisal
Appendix C Sheffield Tram Train Indicative Flood Risk Assessment
6. 1
1 Introduction
1.1 Project Overview
1.1.1 The Tinsley Chord project would involve the construction of
400 metres (m) of chord and other ancillary works between
existing railway and the Sheffield Supertram lines in the
Tinsley area to the east of Sheffield. The purpose of the chord
is to enable the operation of a Tram Train service between
Sheffield and Rotherham. Figure 1 shows the location of the
proposed project.
1.2 Legislative Requirements
1.2.1 In December 2014, Network Rail submitted a request to the
Secretary of State for Transport for a Screening Decision on
the need to carry out an Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) of the project. The report that accompanied the request
(see Appendix A of this report) set out an appraisal of the
potential environmental effects of the proposals and
concluded that EIA is not required. The Secretary of State for
Transport issued his screening decision on 21st
January 2015,
which confirmed that an EIA of the project is not required. The
screening decision letter is included at Tab 15 of the
application file for the Transport and Works Act Order.
1.3 Purpose of this Report
1.3.1 This report has been prepared to provide supporting
environmental information for Network Rail and SYPTE’s’s
application for a Transport and Works Act Order for those
components of the Tinsley Chord project that would involve
works on land owned by third parties. The other project
components will be delivered using permitted development
rights. This report brings together the environmental
information gathered through the development of the project
proposals, and presents that information in one document for
ease of reference.
7. 2
2 Project Description
2.1.1 The proposal is to create a 400m long chord line between an
existing railway line and the South Yorkshire Supertram
network which would enable the operation of a Tram Train
service between Sheffield and Rotherham. The chord would
leave the Supertram line between the Tinsley/ Meadowhall
South and Meadowhall Interchange tram stops, and would
join the railway line between Tinsley South and Tinsley East
stations. The chord would pass beneath the M1 motorway to
the east of the Meadowhall shopping centre. The location is
shown on Figure 1.
2.1.2 is the proposed works not on Network Rail land are the
subject of an application for a Transport and Works Act
Order.
2.1.3 Approximately 200m of minor track works would be required
on the existing Supertram line to accommodate the chord.
These works would be limited to track lifts of approximately
25mm and horizontal movements of the track by up to
50mm.
2.1.4 A small building would be erected adjacent to the new track,
and would be raised off the ground to protect it from flooding.
The building would house electrical isolation equipment
associated with the overhead traction system.
2.1.5 A user-worked crossing (UWC) is proposed across the
chord, to enable the Highways Agency to cross over when
required.
2.1.6 A track drainage system would be installed to carry away
surface water run-off. This would be a gravity system,
following the gradient of the land, which falls away slightly
from east to west. The drainage system would discharge
either to the existing Supertram drainage system or directly
to the River Don, subject to agreement with the Environment
Agency.
2.1.7 The new chord would be securely fenced.
2.1.8 A temporary compound would be required during
construction.
2.1.9 Vehicular access to the chord and to the temporary
compound would be gained from an existing spur off the Bus
Rapid Transport (BRT) North road. The access road would
be retained after construction to enable access by the
Highways Agency, Network Rail and South Yorkshire
Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE).
8. 3
3 Methodology
3.1.1 This report has been prepared through desk-based study,
and draws upon the findings of the following reports
prepared by others:
Tinsley Chord Ecological Appraisal Report, prepared
by Bakers Ecology on behalf of Network Rail, October
2014
Tinsley Chord Flood Risk Assessment, prepared by
JBA on behalf of Network Rail, October 2014
Tinsley Chord Screening Report, prepared by TATA on
behalf of Network Rail, December 2014
3.1.2 The reports listed above were prepared by qualified
professionals using appropriate methods. The reports are
included as appendices to this document.
3.1.3 The following should be noted when reading the reports in
the appendices:
Whilst the ecological appraisal report is focussed on
the chord area, the phase 1 habitat survey reported in
it did extend beyond the area of works covered by the
application for the Transport and Works Act Order.
The ecological appraisal report notes that single track
OLE would be installed. However, in places there
would be twin tracks.
The ecological appraisal report refers to the Supertram
line running across Alsing Road, to the north of the
chord location. This should not have been referred to
as a ‘level crossing’.
The flood risk assessment and its recommendations
relating to wider tram-train project, beyond the Tinsley
Chord, may be subject to change as the design
progresses.
The environmental features map attached to this
environmental report supersedes that included in the
screening report.
3.1.4 In addition, the following websites have been used:
Defra’s MAGIC website (magic.defra.gov.uk)
Sheffield City Council website
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council website
Sheffield Wildlife Trust website
3.1.5 This environmental report has been structured around key
environmental topic areas. Baseline environmental
conditions have been described for each topic, and clear
explanations have been provided for any potential impacts
9. 4
that are to be avoided through the use of environmental
management measures.
10. 5
4 Air Quality
4.1 Baseline Information
4.1.1 The Screening Report identified that there is an Air Quality
Management Area (AQMA) in Sheffield, relating to the
pollutants nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulates (PM10).
This is the Sheffield Citywide AQMA, and is described on the
Defra website (http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/aqma/local-
authorities) as follows:
An area covering entire eastern part of the City containing
the major built up areas now declared for annual and 1-hour
nitrogen dioxide objectives, and the 24-hour PM10 objective.
4.1.2 The Sheffield AQMA extends as far as the eastern boundary
of the local authority area, and therefore includes the area of
the proposed chord.
4.1.3 A check of the Defra website has found a number of AQMAs
declared by Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, but
none of those extend to the area of the proposed chord. The
nearest is Rotherham AQMA1 – Part 2, declared for NO2
from transport and industrial sources. This AQMA is
approximately 800m from the proposed chord at its closest
point.
4.1.4 The nearest residential properties to the proposed site are in
Tinsley, over 200m from the proposed chord. They are
separated from the site by the existing railway line, the River
Don, the River Don Navigation (Sheffield and Tinsley Canal),
a sewage works, commercial buildings and the A6178.
4.2 Potential Impacts
(a) Construction
4.2.2 Good construction site practice would be achieved through
the use of a construction environmental management plan
(CEMP), which would include measures to minimise exhaust
emissions from plant and to control nuisance dust.
(b) Operation
4.2.3 The project aims to promote a modal shift towards the use of
trams, and is therefore expected to lead to a beneficial
impact on local air quality as a result of reduced transport-
related emissions.
11. 6
5 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
5.1 Baseline Information
5.1.1 The screening report identified no cultural heritage or
archaeological features within the area of the proposed
works. The site is entirely made ground, reported to be
comprised of demolition material and fill material, and so
there is very limited potential for previously undisturbed
archaeological remains to be present.
5.2 Potential Impacts
5.2.1 No impacts on archaeology and cultural heritage are
predicted.
12. 7
6 Contaminated Land
6.1 Baseline Information
6.1.1 The screening report notes that ground investigation and
waste classification testing have been carried out for the
project. Hydrocarbon contamination was identified within the
made ground, and one sample out of 18 was positive for
asbestos.
6.2 Potential Impacts
6.2.1 Excavated material may be unsuitable for re-use on site and
may need to be treated or disposed of as hazardous waste.
There is the potential for pollutant pathways to be opened up
as a result of construction activities. Potential receptors
include construction site workers, the nearby River Don and
the underlying Secondary A aquifers in the bedrock and in
the superficial deposits close to the River Don.
6.2.2 The foundations have been designed to minimise the
excavation and disturbance of potentially contaminated land,
through the use of piled foundations for the majority of the
OLE masts, and minimal excavation for track foundations.
6.2.3 All foundations and piling in potentially contaminated land
would be subject to risk assessments to meet Environment
Agency requirements.
6.2.4 Excavated material would be tested before re-use or
disposal.
6.2.5 With these management measures in place, no residual
impacts relating to contaminated land are predicted.
13. 8
7 Ecology
7.1 Baseline Information
7.1.1 Desk Study
7.1.2 There are no national, European or internationally
designated ecological sites within the site or a 2km study
area around the site.
7.1.3 Sheffield City Council is currently preparing a new Local
Plan. Until that plan is adopted, development decisions will
use the 2013 pre-submission proposals map. That map
identifies a local nature site (although not designated as a
nature reserve) to the south east of the site; this extends
between the existing railway line and the River Don. Further
east, after the railway crosses the River Don, the local nature
site continues on the northern side of the railway, leading
eventually to a local nature reserve at Blackburn Meadows,
approximately 1.3km from the proposed chord location.
7.1.4 There is one other local nature reserve within 2km of the
site. This is Woolley Wood, an ancient bluebell wood,
approximately 1.3km to the north west.
7.1.5 Areas of woodland are found adjacent to the site but not
within the footprint of the proposed development.
7.1.6 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey
(a) Habitats
7.1.7 The ecological appraisal report prepared by Baker Ecology
includes the findings of a Phase 1 Habitat Survey carried out
in September 2014. At the western limit of the proposed
scheme, the survey found newly-regenerated scrub and
broadleaved woodland of low ecological value. Slightly
further east, and heading under the Tinsley Viaduct, is an
area of bare hardstanding interspersed with occasional
young silver birch and tall ruderal vegetation. To the east of
that largely bare section, the survey found an area of
immature broadleaved woodland, dominated by bindweed
and bramble. The most easterly part of the survey area,
adjacent to the northern side of the existing railway line, is
also an area of immature broadleaved woodland and has
thick undergrowth.
(b) Species
7.1.8 In relation to protected species, the survey could not rule out
the presence of badger, but found no signs of them on site,
and the potential for them to be present is low, based on the
limited availability of suitable habitat. For bats, the only
14. 9
potential roost locations would be within the Tinsley Viaduct
structure; the trees on site are too immature to support
roosts. No suitable habitat for otter or water vole was found
during the survey. No signs of amphibian species were
found, although some of the densely vegetated areas may
offer suitable habitat. Similarly, no signs were found of
reptiles, although there is some potentially suitable habitat
for them.
7.1.9 Breeding birds may be present within the site during the
breeding season.
7.1.10 No damaging invasive species were found within the
proposed site. However, Japanese knotweed was recorded
approximately 50m to the south of the site, on the south
bank of the River Don, and Himalayan balsam was recorded
approximately 10m to the south of the site, on the northern
bank of the river.
7.2 Potential Impacts
7.2.1 The ecological appraisal report found that there would be no
impacts on designated ecological sites as a result of the
project.
7.2.2 The project would disturb small areas of habitat, mostly
comprising immature broadleaved woodland of low
ecological value.
7.2.3 The ecological appraisal report concluded that there would
be no impact on badgers as a result of the scheme.
7.2.4 In relation to bats, the same report found that there would be
no impact on bats. The report advises that further surveys
would be required if works were proposed to the Tinsley
Viaduct; however, the design does not propose such works.
7.2.5 There is the potential to impact on other mammals through
site clearance activities. Therefore, care and attention would
be taken during site clearance to enable any mammals, such
as foxes or hedgehogs, to escape before clearance works
continued.
7.2.6 The ecological appraisal report predicted no impact on
amphibians or reptiles.
7.2.7 Site clearance works have the potential to affect breeding
birds, if carried out during the breeding season. However,
vegetation clearance would take place outside of the bird
breeding season, wherever reasonably practicable (the
season runs from the beginning of March to the end of
September). If this is not possible, an ecologist would
supervise the clearance works so that no nests would be
affected.
15. 10
7.2.8 Japanese knotweed is present approximately 10m from the
site, and there is the potential for the construction works to
cause this to spread. Therefore, a Japanese knotweed
management plan would be produced so that the stands of
knotweed beyond the site boundary would not be
accidentally disturbed as a result of the project. With the
implementation of this plan, no impact on invasive species is
predicted.
16. 11
8 Landscape and Visual Amenity
8.1 Baseline Information
8.1.1 The location of the proposed chord is an inaccessible area.
The site is an area of previously industrial land that has been
cleared and securely fenced, and has no current use. There
are no public rights of way or public access into the
proposed development area.
8.1.2 The M1 motorway passes over the site on a viaduct. Views
into the site from surrounding land are blocked by vegetation
between the site and the River Don to the west, south and
east. To the north, a further line of trees follows the line of a
dismantled railway line. There are no sensitive receptors
with views into the site.
8.1.3 There are no sensitive landscape areas within 2km of the
site.
8.2 Potential Impacts
8.2.1 The project would not have any impact on landscape
character. The development of the chord between an
existing railway line and tram line, on a site with a history of
industrial use, is considered to be in keeping with the
existing environment.
8.2.2 Although glimpsed views the construction works may be
gained from vehicles travelling on the M1 above the site,
such views would be fleeting, and the works would not be
detrimental to any existing views. No sensitive receptors
would experience any impact in relation to visual amenity.
8.2.3 There would be no permanent lighting along the chord.
Limited security lighting would be provided for the trackside
building, and would be directional to avoid light spillage.
This lighting would have no impact on any sensitive
receptors.
17. 12
9 Materials and Waste
9.1 Baseline Information
9.1.1 Contaminated material has been identified on site through
the ground investigations. These found asbestos in one
sample, and also the presence of hydrocarbons.
9.2 Potential Impacts
9.2.1 Measures would be employed to avoid the potential for the
project to create pathways that could enable contamination
to migrate into the surrounding land and water, and to affect
people working on site.
9.2.2 The depletion of raw and manufactured materials for the
construction of the project would be on a minor scale, but
would be minimised through good site practice.
9.2.3 A site waste management plan and materials management
plan would be implemented for this project. These would
detail the disposal arrangements for hazardous waste to
prevent adverse impacts on land, water, biodiversity or site
workers.
9.2.4 The use of piled foundations rather than pad foundations
would minimise the generation of excavated material.
9.2.5 The materials management plan would include measures to
avoid damage to stockpiled materials, and would identify
opportunities to re-use site-won material, including track
materials, on site.
9.2.6 With these measures in place, there would be no significant
adverse impacts relating to materials or waste.
18. 13
10 Noise and Vibration
10.1 Baseline Information
10.1.1 The M1 motorway passes over the site on a viaduct. The
viaduct is a two-tier structure, which also carries the A631 at
a lower level. Traffic on the motorway and A631 is the
dominant source of noise in the locality.
10.1.2 The nearest residential properties to the proposed site are in
Tinsley, over 200m from the proposed chord. They are
separated from the site by the existing railway line, the River
Don, the River Don Navigation (Sheffield and Tinsley Canal),
a sewage treatment works, commercial buildings and the
A6178.
10.1.3 Another potentially sensitive receptor is the Hanfia Mosque
on Sheffield Road (the A6178) in Tinsley, over 350m from
the proposed site for the chord.
10.1.4 A public right of way follows the northern bank of the
Sheffield and Tinsley Canal, to the south of the site.
10.2 Potential Impacts
10.2.1 There would be no significant noise impacts as a result of
the construction or operation of the proposed chord. This is
due to the combination of the existing elevated noise levels
in the area and the distance between the site and any
potentially sensitive receptors.
19. 14
11 Water
11.1 Baseline Information
11.1.1 The River Don passes under the western part of the site.
The River Don in this area is classified by the Environment
Agency under the Water Framework Directive as a heavily
modified waterbody with moderate ecological potential. The
waterbody is failing in terms of its chemical quality. Just to
the south of the River Don is the Sheffield and South
Yorkshire Navigation (Sheffield and Tinsley Canal), which is
classified as an artificial waterbody with good ecological
potential. The canal’s chemical quality is not classified.
11.1.2 The site is within Flood Zone 2, as shown on Environment
Agency flood maps. Zone 2 land is assessed as having
between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual probability of river
flooding (1% – 0.1%) in any year.
11.1.3 The site overlies a Secondary A aquifer in the bedrock,
which extends across much of South Yorkshire. There is
also a Secondary A aquifer in the superficial deposits, linked
to the course of the River Don.
11.1.4 There is an existing drainage network within the Supertram
network, into which it is expected that the chord drainage
would discharge. There are no existing drains within the rest
of the proposed chord site.
11.2 Potential Impacts
11.2.1 Construction works at the western extent of the site would
take place within eight metres of the River Don. Good site
practice would be employed to avoid the potential for an
accidental spillage that could impact on water quality in the
river.
11.2.2 A construction environmental management plan (CEMP)
would be prepared and implemented, including measures to
protect the water environment. Spill kits and drip trays would
be used on site, and procedures would be in place to
manage the risks associated with accidental spillages. The
CEMP would also include measures to deal with the risk of
flooding at the site during construction. No significant
residual impacts on the water environment are predicted as
a result of the construction works.
11.2.3 The project is not expected to have any impacts on
groundwater in the area, as noted in the screening report.
11.2.4 During operation, surface water runoff from the chord would
be considered to be clean, and would have no impact on the
quality of the receiving water environment. However, the
20. 15
details of the drainage design would be agreed with the
Environment Agency. There is scope to include oil
interceptors and geo-textile membranes as necessary.
11.2.5 In order to protect the development from flood risk, the track
would be on a minor embankment and the electrical building
would be on stilts, to raise them out of the floodplain.
Appropriate attenuation measures would be incorporated
into the drainage design, through discussion with the
Environment Agency, in order not to cause any significant
impact on flood risk through increased runoff. With these
measures in place, no significant impacts relating to flood
risk are predicted.
11.2.6 The Environment Agency was consulted by the Secretary of
State as part of the EIA screening exercise. The
Environment Agency responded by letter on 21st January
2015, advising that risks relating to flood risk and controlled
waters could be assessed outside of an EIA, and that the
Environment Agency wished to be included in further
consultation on the proposals. This matches the approach
being taken by the project team.
21. 16
12 Conclusion
12.1.1 The Tinsley Chord would enable a Tram Train service to
operate between Sheffield and Rotherham. The project
offers benefits in terms of sustainable transport.
12.1.2 The design includes piled foundations which would minimise
the excavation and disturbance of potentially contaminated
land. Any excavated material would be tested for
contamination prior to re-use or disposal.
12.1.3 The track would be on a minor embankment and the
electrical building would be on stilts, to raise them out of the
floodplain. Appropriate attenuation measures would be
incorporated into the drainage design, and the necessary
approval would be sought from the Environment Agency.
12.1.4 Site clearance would take place with due care and attention
and at appropriate times of year, in order to avoid impacts on
flora and fauna, including breeding birds.
12.1.5 A construction environmental management plan (CEMP)
would be prepared and implemented on site, to manage the
environmental aspects of the project. This would include
measures to manage the risk of pollution from accidental
spillages. Linked to the CEMP, a site waste management
plan, materials management plan and Japanese knotweed
management plan would be prepared and implemented.
12.1.6 This report has considered the environmental aspects of the
project, drawing upon the more detailed reports included in
the appendices, and concurs with the findings of the TATA
EIA Screening Report that there would be no significant
adverse environmental impacts as a result of the project.
26. Network Rail
Network Rail Project Number - 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006
P07
Final Issue
December 2014
27.
28. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 2 December 2014
Document History
Version
No.
Approved by
Date
Description Prepared
By
Reviewed
By
Approved
By
P01 20/10/2014 Draft Issue ES MGW MGW
P02 07/11/2014 Updated issue to address Anne
Dugdale, Paul Panini and Brian
Chadwick comments
ES JH MGW
P03 17/11/2014 Updated from further comments
from Anne Dugdale and Paul
Panini
ES JH MGW
P04 21/11/2014 Final draft ES JH MGW
P05 10/12/2014 Updated issue following
comments
ES JH MGW
P06 11/12/2014 Updated issue following design
change
ES JH MGW
P07 16/12/2014 Final issue following design
change
ES JH MGW
Distribution List
Name Role Contact Email
David Brown Tata Steel Projects
Project Engineer
David.i.brown@tatasteel.com
Marcus Grundy-Wakelin Tata Steel Projects
Principal Environmental
Consultant
Marcus.grundy-wakelin@tatasteel.com
Anne Dugdale Head of Consents –
Network Rail
Anne.Dugdale@networkrail.co.uk
Paul Panini Environmental
Specialist LNE Region
paul@esp-uk.com
Brian Chadwick Scheme Project
Manager – Network Rail
BrianChadwick@ontrackdesign.co.uk
John Lipscomb Delegated Project
Engineer – Network Rail
John.Lipscomb@networkrail.co.uk
29. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 3 December 2014
Table of Contents
1.1 Introduction 4
1.2 Background 6
1.3 Site Description and Location 8
1.4 Description of the Proposed Project 11
1.5 Environmental Management & Governance of Railway Infrastructure Projects 17
1.6 Policy Background 18
2.0 EIA Screening Analysis 20
3.0 EIA Analysis and Screening Summary Matrix 23
4.0 Conclusions 34
Figures
Figure 1 - Setting of the project within local area .............................................................................. 7
Figure 2 - Extents of the Tinsley Chord. .......................................................................................... 8
Figure 3 – Historic Land Use for Tinsley Chord - Ordnance Survey 1965-1970.............................. 10
Figure 4 – Existing Sheffield Supertram OLE mast on section of double track................................ 12
Figure 5 – Existing heavy rail OLE structure, Single Track Cantilever, similar those to be specified
for the Tinsley Chord project .......................................................................................................... 13
Figure 6 – Existing heavy rail OLE structure, Twin Track Cantilever, similar those to be specified for
the Tinsley Chord project................................................................................................................ 13
Figure 7 – Typical tram signal and signal post, similar those to be specified for the Tinsley Chord
project ............................................................................................................................................ 14
Figure 8 – Image showing an example of a User Worked Crossing with rubber modular units and
gates (TSP Project Image Library) ................................................................................................. 15
Figure 9 – Example of a Trackside Building, similar to the one to be constructed on Tinsley Chord.
....................................................................................................................................................... 17
Figure 10 – Tinsley Chord Environmental Features Map Appendix A
Figure 11 – High Level Environmental Features Map Appendix A
Appendices
Appendix A: Environmental Features Maps
Appendix B: Environmental Risk Assessment
Appendix C: References
30. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 4 December 2014
1.1 Introduction
1.1.1 This report supports Network Rail’s request for a Screening Decision from the
Secretary of State for Transport on the need to carry out an Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) for the proposed Tinsley Chord Project.
1.1.2 The Tinsley Chord project is the construction of a new 400m rail link between an
existing Network Rail line and the existing Sheffield Supertram line, which will enable
the operation of a through Tram Train service between Sheffield and Rotherham.
The location and footprint of the proposed chord is illustrated in Appendix A
(Environmental Features Map).
1.1.3 As part of the project, 250m of railway track will be constructed on Network Rail land
at the eastern end of the chord while the remaining 150m will be constructed on third
party land at the western end. Approximately 200m of minor track works will be
required on the existing Supertram line to allow the integration of the chord. The
works on Network Rail land will be on an area where tracks have previously been
laid and where ballast remains. Works on the existing Supertram tracks will be
limited to track lifts of approximately 25mm and small horizontal movements of the
track of no more than 50mm.
1.1.4 A small building (approximately 5m long by 2.5m wide by 2.5m high) will be erected
adjacent to the track on the chord, and will be raised off the ground to protect it from
flood events. It will house the electrical isolation equipment associated with the
overhead traction system.
1.1.5 Vehicle access to the chord and to the temporary compound area, that will be
required during its construction phase, will be gained from an existing spur that has
been constructed as part of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) North road. The spur and
access road to the chord will be retained post-construction; however the construction
compound will be removed. This is to enable access by the Highways Agency,
Network Rail and South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE), for
routine maintenance activities. Additionally a User Worked Crossing (UWC) is
31. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 5 December 2014
proposed to enable the Highways Agency to cross the chord as and when required;
its location is illustrated on the Environmental Features Map in Appendix A.
1.1.6 This report provides an appraisal of the environmental baseline and an assessment
of the potential environmental effects of the proposed works to construct and operate
the Tinsley Chord. The appraisal is based on desk based studies, supplemented by
walk-over surveys. It sets out the proposals to manage environmental risks through
design, construction, and operation.
1.1.7 It is considered that a Transport & Works Act Order (TWA Order, 1992) is the
appropriate consent route to secure authority to construct, maintain and operate the
proposed Tinsley Chord. In due course Network Rail will apply for a TWA order to
the Secretary of State for Transport, via the Department for Transport (DfT) TWA
Orders Unit. Therefore this request for an EIA Screening Decision is made in
accordance with the procedures set out in The Transport and Works (Applications
and Objection Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006, known as “the
Application Rules”.
1.1.8 The proposal comprises a project of a type mentioned in Annex II to the EIA Directive
(2011/92/EU) (as amended); 10. Infrastructure Projects:
(c) Construction of railways and intermodal transhipment facilities, and of
intermodal terminals (projects not included in Annex I)
1.1.9 The proposed development site comprises approximately 1.6 hectares during
construction and operation (see Appendix A for the extents), which includes the area
of the new chord, a small building, and the temporary construction compound.
1.1.10 No part of the proposed development falls within a sensitive area, as defined in the
Annex and Rules, i.e., no part of the project footprint is within or adjacent to a. Site of
Special Scientific Interest, Special Protection Area, Special Areas of Conservation,
and / or Ramsar Site, Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, National Park, World
Heritage Site or Scheduled Monument.
32. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 6 December 2014
1.1.11 Annex II development only requires EIA if a project is likely to give rise to significant
environmental impacts. An assessment of potential environmental impacts has been
undertaken in line with Annex III of the EIA Directive (2011/92/EU) and the
Application Rules. This included consideration of the characteristics of the proposed
project; the environmental sensitivity of the area likely to be affected by the project,
and the potential significant effects of the project, with regard the impact, magnitude
and complexity of the impact, probability, duration, frequency and reversibility and to
transfrontier impacts. This report concludes that the proposed development will not
give rise to significant environmental impacts.
1.2 Background
1.2.1 The Tram Train Pilot is a jointly managed scheme with the Department for Transport
(DfT); Northern Rail Limited; South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive
(SYPTE), and South Yorkshire Supertram Limited (SYSL).
1.2.2 SYPTE are responsible for procuring the Tram Train vehicles to be used on the new
service. SYPTE owns the Supertram infrastructure. SYSL operates the tramway
under the terms of a concession with SYPTE.
1.2.3 A key objective of the Tram Train pilot scheme is to demonstrate the costs and
benefits of operating a standard continental design of Tram Train on the national rail
network with a minimum level of adaptation. The benefits to be investigated include:
the potential for lower infrastructure capital and maintenance costs compared to
heavy rail service; and the level of passenger demand and satisfaction to be derived
from using the new technology.
1.2.4 The purpose of the proposed Tinsley Chord is to create a fixed link between the
existing Network Rail and South Yorkshire SuperTram networks, which will enable
the operation of a through Tram Train service between Sheffield and Rotherham.
This will allow the extension of the Sheffield Supertram service to the east, linking the
conurbations of Sheffield and Rotherham; terminating at Parkgate Shopping Centre,
Rotherham.
33. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 7 December 2014
1.2.5 The location of the chord within the wider geographical area is illustrated in Figure 1:
Figure 1 - Setting of the project within local area
Imagery taken from Google Earth pro
1.2.6 Figure 2 illustrates the proposed chord alignment in the context of the existing
infrastructure. Please see Appendix A, Environmental Features Map, for a detailed
drawing of the project extents and surrounding environs.
1.2.7 The proposed construction programme currently schedules works between
December 2015 and August 2016.
M1 motorway
34. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 8 December 2014
Figure 2 - Extents of the Tinsley Chord.
Imagery taken from Google Earth pro
Red line Existing Supertram line between Tinsley and Meadowhall
Yellow Line Existing Network Rail line between Sheffield and Rotherham
Blue Line 150m of the Tinsley Chord on third party land
Green Line 50m of the Tinsley Chord on Network Rail land
Brown area Proposed area of development
1.3 Site Location and Description
1.3.1 The site of the proposed chord is located in the valley of the River Don between
Sheffield and Rotherham and is in the vicinity of the Sheffield suburbs of Tinsley;
Wincobank, and Meadowhall, at approximate Grid Reference SK 39713 91287. The
main railway line between Sheffield and Rotherham runs 500m north of site. Tinsley
Viaduct, carrying the M1 and A631 between the north and southbound exits (junction
34) of the M1, passes over the western portion of the chord.
1.3.2 The site was previously rail locked land, with rail lines to the north, south and west.
Currently there is no public access and no public rights of way across the site. The
rail line to the north was removed after the closure of the steel works during the
35. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 9 December 2014
1970s. The land was used as a stockyard containing railway sidings for local steel
works until circa 1970. The land has remained unused since that time. The historic
land use of the proposed project area (1965 – 1970) is shown in Figure 3, taken from
a GroundSure Environmental Insight report.
1.3.3 The land immediately to the north of the proposed chord was the site of Blackburn
Meadows (Tinsley) Power Station from 1921 until its decommissioning in 1980. Part
of this site is currently being redeveloped as part of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
North road project, which will connect Meadowhall Way to Sheffield Road.
1.3.4 There is limited vegetation within the project footprint as the majority of the chord will
be constructed on existing hard standing and made ground. Habitat surveys confirm
that the limited vegetation present at the site is of low ecological value.
36. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 10 December 2014
Figure 3 – Historic Land Use for Tinsley Chord - Ordnance Survey 1965-1970
37. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 11 December 2014
1.4 Description of the proposed project
1.4.1 The western extent of the chord will be linked to the existing Supertram network via a
double junction; this is a configuration of rails that will allow twin-track to twin-track
connectivity. This junction will be constructed approximately 20m north-east of the
River Don. From here the chord will turn through approximately 90 degrees and run
in a west to east direction under Tinsley Viaduct. This area of land is owned by the
Highways Agency and is unused and fenced off to prevent unauthorised access.
Once the chord has passed under the Tinsley Viaduct the two tracks will join into a
single bi-directional line (this will allow train movements in both directions) via a
single set of points.
1.4.2 A short section of the route (approximately 25m) passes through an area of
vegetation characterised as immature broadleaved semi-natural woodland. However,
surveys have confirmed that it is of low ecological value. The chord then turns to run
in a north-easterly direction within the existing Network Rail boundary and alongside
the existing Network Rail freight line towards Rotherham, for approximately 250m,
before connecting into the existing rail system via a transitional length of rail along
the existing ballasted track bed (foundations consisting or stone material supporting
the rails and sleepers). The eventual connection will be via a new single junction (this
is a configuration of rails that will allow single-track to single-track connectivity). The
rail level at the easterly extent of the chord is approximately 500mm above that of the
westerly rail level at the Supertram double junction.
1.4.3 The chord will run on short lengths of embankment, in the order of between 150mm
and 600mm in height.
1.4.4 A 3m wide path will be provided along both sides of the tracks for the length of the
chord. This will be used by maintenance staff for access along the chord once
operational.
1.4.5 Approximately 200m of minor track works will be required on the existing Supertram
line to enable the integration of the chord. These works will be within the existing
Supertram line and will be limited to track lifts of approximately 50mm and small
38. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 12 December 2014
horizontal movements of the track of no more than 300mm. A short section of these
works will take place over the River Don. This section of the works will be on the
existing steel and concrete bridge deck which is impermeable to liquids. Over this
section the works are limited to horizontal track movements of less than 50mm and
track lifts that will be less than 25mm. These small adjustments will allow seamless
integration of the chord into the existing infrastructure.
1.4.6 Localised track re-alignment (generally less than 50mm) will be required to
accommodate the new junctions to the west and east of the chord.
1.4.7 New Overhead Line Equipment (OLE) masts will be installed along the length of the
Tinsley Chord on Network Rail and third party land. These carry the electrified wires
that apply power to the Tram Train vehicles. The chord will utilise overhead
equipment similar to the Supertram existing system at the Supertram end and
Network Rail equipment at the Network Rail end of the chord. Figures 4, 5 and 6
show images of three configurations of OLE masts. A transition between the two
systems will be made across the length of the chord.
Figure 4 – Existing Sheffield Supertram OLE mast on section of double track
(TSP Project Image Library)
39. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 13 December 2014
Figure 5 – Existing heavy rail OLE structure, Single Track Cantilever, similar
those to be specified for the Tinsley Chord project
(TSP Project Image Library)
Figure 6 – Existing heavy rail OLE structure, Twin Track Cantilever, similar
those to be specified for the Tinsley Chord project
(TSP Project Image Library)
40. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 14 December 2014
1.4.8 The OLE structures will be constructed up to 6100mm above track level, and will be
capable of spanning sections of double track. It is expected that approximately 27
No. new OLE masts will be installed on piled foundations.
1.4.9 Four new train signals (similar to road traffic signals and mounted on posts) to control
train movements will be constructed along the Tinsley Chord (see Appendix A for
locations). Cable ducts will be installed along the new line. These will either be
surface troughing or a buried route depending on the perceived risk of cable theft.
Figure 7 – Typical tram signal and signal post, similar those to be specified for
the Tinsley Chord project
(TSP Project Image Library)
1.4.10 A User Worked Crossing (UWC) will be installed to enable the Highways Agency to
cross the chord; its location is shown on the Environmental Features Map in
Appendix A.
1.4.11 A UWC is a type of crossing for vehicles that will be protected by gates on both sides
of the tramway. The gates will be closed across the road and hung so as to open
away from the railway. The crossing will be operated by authorised users only
(Highway Agency or other designated personnel). The UWC will be constructed from
41. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 15 December 2014
modular rubber units, its approach will be graded to allow safe passage across the
tracks for vehicles, and there will gates on either side of the crossing, similar to the
example shown in Figure 8 below.
Figure 8 – Image showing an example of a User Worked Crossing with rubber
modular units and gates
(TSP Project Image Library)
1.4.12 A track drainage system will be installed to carry away surface water run-off from the
chord. The ground levels at the western extent are approximately 500mm lower than
the levels at the eastern extent and so lends itself to a gravity fed system (pumping
will not be required to transfer the collected surface water run-off).
1.4.13 The water will be transferred via a filter carrier drainage system to a discharge point
that will outfall either into the existing SYSL track drainage or alternatively into the
River Don. The footprint of both of these drainage systems is included within the
footprint of the proposed development shown in Appendix A.
1.4.14 If it is necessary to discharge surface water collected from the chord into the River
Don, then the outfall location, its form and the parameters of the discharged water
(eg volume, peak flow, chemical composition etc) will be identified and designed in
42. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 16 December 2014
accordance with the relevant Environment Agency guidance; in consultation with the
Environment Agency, and where appropriate the necessary approval(s) will be
sought.
1.4.15 If the proposed drainage outfalls to the existing SYSL drainage then the existing
consent parameters will not be exceeded.
1.4.16 The drainage system will be designed to avoid contact between surface water and
any potential pollutants. The drainage system will include components such as
volume attenuation tanks, oil/petrol interceptors and impermeable (geo-textile)
membranes, as is deemed necessary to control both the quality and quantity of
surface water leaving the chord. These measures will appropriately manage potential
risks to the receiving environment. As a result no significant impact on the water
environment is anticipated.
1.4.17 A temporary compound and associated access road will be established on an area of
existing hard standing (see Appendix A for location). The hard standing is suitable for
use as the access road and no further preparation works prior to its use are required.
The access road between the BRT North road and the temporary compound, which
is approximately 150m long, will be fenced using 3m high palisade fencing. This
fencing will remain in place on completion of the works.
1.4.18 There are no existing surface or ground water drains in the temporary compound
area. This area will be used for the temporary storage of construction plant, materials
and the provision of welfare facilities for the construction team.
1.4.19 A new small building will be installed on the trackside. The building will house
electrical isolation equipment associated with the overhead traction system. This will
include battery back up for the motorised switching equipment. This building will be
approximately 5m long by 2.5m wide by 2.5m high and will be raised off the ground
to protect it from flood events. The foundations for the building will be piled and it will
be surrounded by 2.4m high palisade fencing. No drainage will be required for this
building though permanent lighting will be installed. Luminaries with 0% upward light
emissions will be installed to minimise potential light impacts to local receptors. Two
potential locations for this small building are being considered; these are shown in
43. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 17 December 2014
the Environmental Features Map in Appendix A. The alternative locations do not
affect the results of the Environmental Risk Assessment or EIA screening analysis.
Figure 9 below shows an example of a similar building at another location:
Figure 9 – Example of a Trackside Building, similar to the one to be constructed on
Tinsley Chord.
(Tata Steel Projects Image Library)
1.5 Environmental Management & Governance of Railway Infrastructure Projects
1.5.1 The construction of railway projects is governed by the GRIP (Governance of Railway
Infrastructure Projects) Process. This is an eight stage design process as described
in the list below:
GRIP 1 – Output Definition
GRIP 2 – Feasibility Stage
GRIP 3 – Option Selection
GRIP 4 – Outline Design
GRIP 5 – Detailed Design
GRIP 6 – Construction Test and Commission
GRIP 7 – Scheme Hand Back
GRIP 8 – Project Close Out
44. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 18 December 2014
1.5.2 At GRIP 4 (outline design) a Design Environmental Management Plan (DEMP) is
required that is based on the principles of ISO 14001: 2004 (The international
standard for Environmental Management Systems), and the NR Contract
Requirements – Environment (NR/SP/ENV/015). The DEMP is a living document that
will be regularly updated throughout the design stage to reflect developments in
design, construction methodology, client aspirations and any other emerging issues.
1.5.3 The DEMP will be used as a baseline for the Construction Environmental
Management Plan that will be used to manage environmental issues during the
construction stage. This will promote the seamless management of environmental
issues that will all necessary actions are implemented.
1.5.4 A DEMP has been developed for the Tram Train Pilot. It will be updated to include
the specific environmental management measures associated with the Tinsley Chord
Project that are identified in this screening report.
1.5.5 An Environmental Risk Assessment has been prepared, which has been used to
qualitatively assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed chord. This
will be used to inform the Construction Environmental Management Plan. The ERA
for Tinsley Chord is contained in Appendix B of this report.
1.6 Policy Background
1.6.1 The Sheffield Tram Train Pilot scheme is supported by government, which has
provided funding to develop and construct the scheme.
1.6.2 The Sheffield City Region Transport Strategy (2011 – 2026) aims to improve
connectivity between major settlements. As part of this, the Strategy states the
implementation of the Tram Train scheme between Sheffield and Rotherham will be
“strongly pursued”, as the project “will expand the existing tram network by enabling
tram access to the existing rail network, and will thus facilitate tram services currently
terminating at Meadowhall to continue towards Rotherham.”
45. Network Rail Network Rail Project Number: 112449
EIA Screening Report – Tinsley Chord
B90506-REP-ENV4006 P07 19 December 2014
1.6.3 The “Enhancement of the Supertram system”, is specifically supported by Policy G of
the Strategy, which seeks “To deliver interventions required for development and
regeneration”. The Tinsley Chord will enhance Supertram by creating a larger
network that can be used by the public to travel between Sheffield and Rotherham.
1.6.4 The project will help to reduce emissions by encouraging people to use the tram as
an alternative to using their cars. This will lead to improved air quality in an AQMA
area (Policy V).
