BASF PDF PLACEMENT

1. Fill' Homr tn~trt o.....qn Tran~ IC-11~ Arum.1bcm <;Jidc, caio.
- - ---- -iAc;J" P-P-c Wv•d
--
CIIPIHIUG -snon
a
a
r
Cick re add ncrreo..
A A P. .-· L1· 1 ~
~ E , ',000 i;l:i ca~ '.,.. P hnd
;"~lr•"· Ll.1 7..00C,-:" o l?s.~c..,. C.
L
: Replace- •
-
£. .a:. ~ ;"1blw Ulf ~ , ' l 1*7 ~ c,,,,' 0 , •rt ~ ........
- - - flllllll
l:l•BASF
'-'b• ,,.,1,• ( •,,., ,1,,
Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) Filling olmuloUon
Or. Mahesh Olvekar
BASF India Lid.
Performance Materials - South Asia
Contact: +91-9930574643
CAD-.gn
-
Performance,evaluation by local failura
m-....,
~ Sh.u r 1,. l ornm,rm1~
~
m
FEA wfth Ultnlslm'il
, ~• !~ ~ [J • Leave

2. B e I..,., r,sss: v mr .fi·H:H:IM
a•BASF
We create chemistry
Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) FIiiing slmulatlon
Dr. Mahesh Divekar
BASF India Ltd.
Performance Materials - South Asia
Contact: +91-9930574643
CAD design
a
Performance evaluation by local failure
criterion
mmcm
El; iF
',',-. , , .
Glass fiber orientation
FEA with Ultrasim®
, ~ 4 !'. • a • Leave

3. Contents
• What is CAE and How its Work...!
• Application Development support through
CAE
• Injection Process Simulations
• Structural Simulations
• Design Optimizations
• CAE Support for All Industries
00:12:0IS ii V1tw
2
Cl•BASF

4. Tool Development Cycle
- - - - -
Idea
------
~ ~ - --;--
,11
[ CAD Modelling 1
---~--~.
r ,.__. t
t
I..!:",-:-J
[ Final Design 1
•
LMan8
;:::r1ng J
--.
Actual Experimental
Testing D•BASF
• - " , . I

5. Tool Development Cycle
Idea
CADMoclelNng
~
[ Prototype
J
e
[ Lab Test
~
• "'
[ ,.....,..... )
~
•
L Sample J
Manufacturing
lf
~ • • E11perlmental
Testing
6
PDC Approach
without Simulation
I
C•BASF
- ~ , ,- . . I

6. ool Development Cycle
Idea
CAD Modelling
r Prototype ]
,e.
[ LabTest 111
• •
rFinal Design7 -A
•
Sample
Manufacturing
Dr. Mahesh Divekar's screen
PDC Approach
without Simulation
• • • • • • • • • D•BASF

7. ool Development Cycle
Idea -
•
CAD Modelling
~
[ Prototype
7
C
C Lab Test
J.-
.. J'
[ Final DNlgn
..
L Sample
Manufacturing
..· - ■
Dr. Mahesh Divekar's screen
PDC Approach
without Simulation
• • • • •
- - - - - -
Idea
( CAD Modelling
~
lCAE Simulation
~
[ Final Design
..
Sample
Manufacturing
•
Actual Experimental
• •
Testing D•BASF

8. AE Simulation Example
Actual Experimental
Testing
Dr. Mahesh Divekar's screen
• • • • • • • • •
CAE Simulation

9. Advantages- Accurate and well in advance simu1
lation CCAE)
•
• Eliminate/Minimize physical prototype testing efforts
• Saves time and Money
• Design decisions can be made in earlier
• Can provide performance insights earlier in the development process.
• Made design evaluation easier.
• Reduce the costs associated with the product lifecycle.
C•BASF
- ~ " • ~ I
10

10. mm AiiiHH,IM 1111
How It Works...!
Autodesk Moldflow
•
• Processing
- F:lling/ Warpage
- Runner balance
- Weld line prediction
- Gate optimization
- Flber orientation
- PU Foam Simulation
- CFD
Leave

11. M ,-- M'M·l·I··l:iA 1111...
How nWorks...!
Autodesk Moldflow Abaqus Implicit Abaqus explicit/ LS Dyna
Altair Optistruct
•
~
Ultraslme
Processing
~ • Basic structure • Shape
• Processing - Liner static strength - Pedestrian protection - Bead
- F1ll1
ng/ Warpage - Burst analysis - Drop test - Frequency
- Runner balance - Modal frequency - High speed burst
- Weld line prediction - V1
brat1on study
- Gate optimization - Seaflng and Creep
- Fiber orientation . Thannal analysis
- PU Foam Simulation
- CFO
Leave

12. I •• s 11sss ez s ,,.,.. ME·ii,H:IM
CAE Support For Application Development
Simulation Capabilities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ULTRASIM®
The Solution
CAE Competence for
Your Innovative
Components
InJection Process
CAE
I I
Structural Simulation Design Optimization

13. I••· t -w sr · ,.-. Ntis+H,IM mm
Plastic Processing Methods
Rotational Mold:ng

14. OCHl55
Injection Process Simulations
• Key Requirements
• Process results validation
• Gate and process optimization for new tool development
• Process Troubleshoot
• Warpage control and mold shrinkage for tool
• Type of Injection Process Simulations
• Injection process simulation for process validation
• Gate and Process parameter opt1mizat1on
• Runner balance analysis for family and multicavity molds
• Core shift analysis
• Sequential gating analysis
• Cooling system analysis
• Process trouble shooting by rnoldflow analysis
• Warpage prediction, Control guidelines
• Mold shrinkage prediction for tool cutting*
Leave
Unmuh: '.:1,ir! '/ :1~·~

15. Injection Process Simulations
Process Analysis Steps
30 CAD Data
Customer
Pre-processing
BASF
+
Moldflow Input
BASF/Customer
Moldflow Process Parameters :
• Gate Location
• Filling time
• Temperature etc
• Results
'
Ill
• Filling Pattern
• Weld lines, Air Voids
• Warpages
• Shrinkage, etc.

16. I •• s II n az , ,,... MM·i#:H:IA
Injection Process Simulations
Process Analysis Steps
30 CAD Data
Customer
Actual part manufacturing
Customer
Pre-processing
BASF
IOpti~ization
I
+
:--~-~
®I
v ~ =----
Moldflow Input
BASF/Customer
Moldflow Process Parameters :
• Gate Location
• Filling time
• Temperature etc
• Results
'
II
• Filling Pattern
• Weld lines, Air Voids
• Warpages
• Shrinkage, etc.
Cl•BASF
00:~9;45
Leave

17. I M■ s 11, r ,.- MM·H:H,iM Ell
Injection Process Simulations
Moldflow
-
~,i·1,
I • -
e""t~
~ ~-.!Si~
Gate Optimization Sequential Gates Runner Balance
Cooling System Advanced Simulations Shrinkage Recommendation

18. e
Gate Optimization
Adjusting Lever
Adjusting Lever
IFIii Pattern I
Original
IFiber Orientation Tensor I
....
Modified
IWeld-Lines I
• Proposed design shows significant warpage improvement.
• Maintained circularity and reduced injection pressure.
21
Internal
am
Proposal
IPart Warpage J
D•BASF
,'I'_. "'dlM ~ 1<, T, q

19. e 1111
Sequential!Gates
Roof Rail
Adjusting Lever Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
?'If
Ultramld 8267GHS
IResults: FIii Pattern IResults : Warpage In All Direction I
t 7
~
Warpage in All direction is 0.262mm to 7.945mm
• Proposed option 1 sequential gating design shows significant warpage improvement.
• Option 1 is better considering warpages, pressure, clamp force and cost point of view. D•BASF
....,. .,a•,. 'l"TI'!
23
Internal

20. II e
Runner Balance
Multicavity runner balance
Ultramid 83WG7
Optimized runner dimensions : Balanced flow
,.,_ ..,.......,.,... MM+i:ii,IM
Uniform runner dimensions : Unbalanced flow
• Uniform runner and gate dimensions results
into unbalanced flow causing into high
pressure and clamp force in the cavity.
• Optimized runner and gate dimensions gives
balanced flow in the cavity.
C•BASF
Leave

21. e
Cooling System
SuccessfuJ case ot Office Chair Lifter Module
Original
I
-
• Form latches directly during mo
lding process.
Positive mold trial feedback from customer
Warpage: improve obviously.
Cycle time: 155s ➔ 47s.
28
Internal
0.-:- alltoffec:tt: t . ~
,..,__,.tJ11.l::1J •OOOO
~ •m
J
..~ ,/4
..~ ldi+
• - T
·-
■ Improve Assembly Efficiency
■ Reduce Cycle Time & Warpage
-
f
:=-;Ji]
t
•
• Proposed design shows significant warpage improvement.
• The cycle time is predicted to have 57% reduction.
D•BASF
lli!!C ,,,:i,e ~•,..n, 0 1

22. 8
Structural Simulation
Structural Analysis Steps
3D CAD Data
Customer
Pre-processing
BASF
◄-------1
37
Actual part manufacturing
Customer
I
IOpti~ization
I
I
I
X
V
Internal
•
Structural Input
BASF/Customer
Loading and Fixed locations
•
-
-
Load
e Fix
• Results
• Displacement
• Stress
• Pressure
• Life, etc.
D•BASF
A.-' l>dl<o~')-,T <!,

23. 8
Stati·c simulation
I· What is static simulations? I
• Analysis to evaluate the progressive failure of the component under the static
loads
• Burst pressure analysis
• Weld bead strength analysis
• Point load analysis
• Torque load analysis
I· Inputs from customer I
• Temperature condition of test
• Load : Pressure, Force, Torque
• Fixation Locations
I· BASF Output I
40
• Failure criteria
• Results:
• Displacement, Stress, Failure if any.
• Design suggestions
• Recommendations in design if failure occurs.
Internal
01:38:1~
D•BASF
We c"Bate cnem,st,y

24. 8
Advanced Simulations
I• Insert shift/ Core shift analysis I I• Mucell I
I• Conformal Cooling I • Transient Ultrasim• Warpage simulations
.i
D•BASF
~ "'d!<o~'-,T,<,
30
Internal

25. 8
Non-Linear static simulation
PAIM: Bursi Pressure Analysis
PAIM: Model
' '
•
-
7 re r
.6. Fix Points
Recommendations
Flange shell
-·
--·
---
Ultramlcte 8233GW PA8 + GF33%
I:
. ,......c.....
~:,..,..b...,...,..._
.,
...~
.,_.._r.-t....,....,_....
1111
_
...
-- Displacement Stresses
'-'~"'
s.-Glo....1!•11 l__.._~tu, lril••I
---~--~
l::::~ :_..,....._.....,...._
~ IIU.<D ,_., _
Ao..,.ua,-,i1MI
.....--...
,..,...,
l
"
"'""
I
:=::
IMII.G
,_..
•-<D
,~..
-1XQO
X
: '
~
, ...,o
•~.ct
,._,,<I
~ PU.Ct
, 1,:11.c,
Ul
'!atoCl
1t:Q.-CI
- 1 1..U.O)
The maximum stress observed at nange shell on s~ffener/ribs. it is 121.32 MPa. This stress
is higher than allowable limit of the material (115 MPa)
Add round cross section as highlighted
In crease lhewith of lhe stiffener.; above atsharp section beads
D•BASF
1'-K-~ +-.31"' c -i..c,-,q ,
41
Internal