attained to sandro suzart cpf 051 812 955 17 attained to sandro suzart cpf 051 812 955 17, toward federal reserve return, government tax return sandro suzart; cpf federal;federal reserve

1. , I am interconnectingasystemof dynamitization of thirdpersonpublicinvestmentof
sistematizationof roundedpublicreform.Asastartinginitiative,actingworldwidelysince 2013 in
Salvador,andinSãoPaulofosteringanurbanplaningconectionof autoinitiative,apublicformof
multi-lateral proposingbasisthatsince mayof that yearpromotedanopen-systemof social urban
re-structurizationthatendedupre-urbanizingasystem,cuturaly,of
USD 264,770,000,000; officialy: http://cidadeaberta.org.br/proposta-de-substitutivo-do-plano-
diretor-estrategico/.(the proposal)
http://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/desenvolvimento_urbano/legislacao/plano_d
iretor/index.php .
http://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/upload/chamadas/lei_13430_1407187409_1
426011333.pdf (the act.)
Thisis the firstbusinessthatImade;I'mnow workinginGermany,Poland,Bangladesh,Romany.
I needUSD 4 billionininvestmentsinmysystemof dinamitizationof publicinfraestructure
of distributionof political endeavorforlabsof sectorial investmentinandwithpublicsectorfor
social investmentaspublicconstructionpolice.
Governmentleadersknow thatbusinessoftenmakesasocial investment.acompanymay
wantto provide financial assistance forcommunitydevelopmentwhile makingaprofit,rate
incentivescouldincrease,programsare supportedbystate tax lawsthat encourage
private-sectorparticipationinthe re-developmentof low-income neighborhoodsthe programs
vary indifferentstates,butmostof the projectseligible forneighborhoodassistancetax credits
workingon,forexample,slumrenewalandplannedcommunitiesthattake accountof human

2. needs.
Overviewof mymarketplace:
*In 2012, the Departmentof Development,Economic,Science andTechnologyhascreated
initiatives,redirectedotherexisting,proposednew lawsandadoptedpro-active stance.These
actionsencompassall areasrelatedtodevelopmentsuchastrainingof qualifiedhumanresources,
technological support,coordinationwithcompaniesandothergovernmentagencies,among
others.Throughstrategicactionscoordinates,the Secretariatlaidthe foundationsforabetterand
more comprehensive sustainable development of the State of São Paulo.
* The PolishMinistryof AdministrationandDigitisationhasinitiateddiscussiononthe law
providingfree accesstopublicresources.TheMinistryhasmade available onitswebpage a
documententitled“DraftGuidelinesforthe Proposal of the Acton OpenPublicResources”and
has invitedinterestedpartiestocomment.Thusa processof “openaccessby law”has begun.It
has beenlongthoughtthatpublicresourcesof variouskindsshouldbe,whenpossible,made
available on the internetforfree alongthe motto:whathasbeenpaidforby publicmoneyis
publicproperty.Usuallysuchinitiativeshave beenvoluntaryandhave thusreliedoneithergood
will orpolitical pressure.Now,however,the Ministryproposeslegislation thatwouldmake
openingpublicresourcesmandatoryandwouldalsoregulate alotof detailedissuesrelatedto
makingcontentopenandavailable forall.
The Draft Guidelinesare buta start, neverthelessone mustsaythatit is quite difficulttopredict
howthiswill all turnout.To beginwith,asthe title revealswhathasbeennow senttothe publicis
not a draft law,butjusta premise (groundwork)forsuchan act. The 22 pageslongdocument(but
the actual proposal takes16 pages) is,at leastinits presentstate,more of a declarationof
intentionsthanaconcrete proposal.Thisisof course on one handunderstandable,butonthe

3. otherexemplifies seriousdifficultiesingivingshape togenerallyapplaudedideas.Asthe Polish
attemptseemstobe one of the firstof itskind,certainlyinthe EU,insightfromothercountries
couldperhapshelptomake it betterandconsequentlytohave a model law forthe rest,which
couldbe at leastworthconsidering.
Beingaware of the complexityof the problemcannotunfortunatelyfullyjustifythe factthatthis
firststep(i.e.the “DraftGuidelines”) isadisappointment.Tounderstandwhyitwouldbe perhaps
bestto summarise the ideasthe Polishgovernmentiscurrentlycontemplating,especiallybecause
I have not beenable tofindthe Englishversionof the proposal.The documentbeginswith
highlightingthe importance of publicresourcesasthe source of informationandknowledgeand
praisingthe benefitsof openaccess.Some examplesare alsoprovided,butitisnothingnew and
not worthrepeating.Whatseemstobe muchmore relevantiswhatspecificlegal solutionsthe
Ministryputsforwardto helprealise the openaccessdream.The proposal stressesthatpublic
resourcesare not identical with“publicsectorinformation”,astheyare rarelycloselyconnected
to the exercise of power.Accesstopublicsectorinformationisjustifiedbythe needtomake
publicbodiesandtheiroperationstransparentforcitizensandenable the controllingfunctionof
democracy.Publicresourcesontheirpartcomprise cultural,scientificandeducational content.It
iscertainlycorrectto notice that the currentlegal instrumentsrelatedtothe accessto public
informationdonotsuffice toguarantee suchaccessto all publicresources,forexample because
publicresourcesare veryoftenprotectedbyintellectual propertyrights(especiallycopyright).The
Ministryexplicitlystatesasitsintentiontoprovide aregulationforpublicresourcesmodelledon
the legislationconcerningthe accesstoand reuse of publicinformation(Law onaccessto public
informationof 2001, Directive onthe re-use of publicsectorinformation), whichwouldmeanthe
general obligationtomake publicresourcesavailable onrequest.The proposedlegislationshould
create a frameworkforacquiringrightssothatpublicresourcescouldbe made available tothe
publicandfor makingthemavailable (e.g.licensecontracts),while atthe same time preserving
adequate flexibilityforpublicbodiestochoose specifictools(e.g.the wayIPrightsare to be
acquired).We are nowon page 6 of the documentandthe level of generalityhardlyallowsforany
reasonable comments.
In p.II the Ministrynamesthe goalsof the proposedlegislation:These are:

4. (a) realisingthe potential fordevelopmentinpubliclyfinancedresources;
(b) differentiatingpublicresourcesfrompublicsectorinformationandthuseliminatinglegal
uncertainty(quite difficulttounderstandassince there isnolegal conceptof openpublic
resourcesat presentnolegal uncertaintyindifferentiatingthesetwoconceptscanexist.Itcan
come to beingwhensuchdifferentiationstartstohave legal consequences,i.e.afterthe law has
come intoforce);
(c) maximisingthe availabilityof publicresources(hardtoargue with);
(d) makingthe conditionsof makingavailable publicdomainworksmore precise (unclear) and
introducingrulesonmakingavailable the protectedsubject-matteredcreatedwithpublicfunds;
(e) makingpossibleforpublicbodiestodraftclearconditionsof usingthe resourcestheycontrol
(whya lawis necessaryforthathas not beenexplained);and
(f) introducingregulationsmakingitimpossible torestrictaccessto currentlyfree resources(i.e.
‘reclaiming’the publicdomain).
It isthoughtreachingthese goalsisindispensibletoachieve the othersetof objectives,namely
the onesdescribedinthe governmentstrategy“Poland2030” and the “DevelopmentChallenges:
Poland2020”). The newlawshouldinteraliaincrease the efficiencyandinnovativenessof
scientificresearch,create newinnovativeproductsbasedonpublicresources,equalise
educational chancesdue toeasieraccesstoknowledge,serve asacatalystfor social activities
usingpubliclyavailableresourcesandcreatingnon-commercial solutions.

5. The law (and,itseems,the obligationtoopenresources) shouldapplytoall entities possessing
publicresources,howeverthe more precise legal definitionshouldrefertothe public
procurementlaw.Thismeansthe scope of applicationof the new ruleswouldbe quiteextensive.
As to the subject-matteritisperhapsbesttotranslate faithfully:“The proposedlaw will regulate
the principlesof acquiring,makingavailable andre-usingpublicresources,understoodasend
content,createdbythe obligatedentity[the ‘obligatedentity’isthe termusedtodesignate public
bodiescoveredbythe proposedlegislation] orfundedwithpublicmeans,regardlessof the wayof
itscreationor fixation,possessingcultural,scientificoreducational value,inparticularmapsand
plans,photographs,filmsandmicrofilms,audioandvideorecordings,opinions,analysis,reports
and otherworksand subject-matterof relatedrightsinthe meaningof the law of 1994 on
copyrightandrelatedrights,aswell asdatabasesinthe meaningof the law of 2001 on the legal
protectionof databases.”Thiswill not,however,includeconfidential orsecretinformationand
such protectedsubject-matterinwhichthe publicbodieshave norightsallowingtomake it
available inopenresources.
The law shouldprovide forstandardrulesconcerningthe acquiringof rightsandmakingthe
resourcesavailable,butitshouldalsogive topublicbodiesthe righttodepartfromthose rules,
whenthe publicinterestsorequires.Asregardsthe problemof acquiringrightsthe law will
introduce twooptions:acquiringall the rightsoracquiringashare inthe relevantright.The latter
optionisof limitedavlue becauseasthe co-ownerthe publicbodywouldnotbe authorisedto
make the work available withoutotherco-owners’consent.The problemwithacquiringthe
totalityof rights isthat it ishardlypossible accordingtothe Polishlaw currentlyinforce.For
example the Polishlawprohibitscopyrightassignmentwithregardtofuture fieldsof exploitation.
Here,itseems,the lawwouldlike tomake anexception:itwillbe obligatoryforthe rightholders
to transfercopyrightwithrespecttothe new fieldsof exploitationtothe publicbodywithout
additional remuneration.
Probablybecause the transferof copyrightwouldnegativelyaffectthe author(he/shewould
cease to be the righholder),the Ministryproposesthatthe authorshouldhave more rightsthan

6. the average user.If the work ismade available withoutanyrestrictions,suchspecialrulesare not
needed,if howeverthere are restrictions,the authoristo be granteda license of awiderscope (a
sort of grant-back,it seems,nofurtherdetailshave beenmentioned).The author,eventhough
nowjusta holderof a non-exclusive license,wouldbe alsoallowedtosue infringers(onlyan
exclusivelicensee candoso underthe currentlaw).What wouldbe the scope of thisexceptional
remedythe draftdoesnotexplain.The acquisitionof sharesincopyrighthasbeenprobably
envisagedforcaseswhere the publicbodyhasmade onlya part of the financial contribution.
Nevertheless,asalreadymentioned,ashare incopyrightdoesnotallow makingthe workavailable
withoutthe otherco-owners’consent.Inpassingthe draftmentionsthe proposedlaw willalso
deal withthe problemof licensingcontracts,namelythatthe assignmentof copyrightrendersthe
license ineffective (since the licensorisnolongerthe ownerof copyright).Interestingly,the draft
doesnotapparentlyintendtoamendthe law,butseekstohave the provisiononthe contract of
lease appliedbyanalogy(!).Itisnotthe onlyplace inthe documentwhenone asksoneself
whetheranytrainedlawyerhadactuallyreaditbefore itwaspostedonline.
As faras the makingavailable partisconcernedthe law will make itmandatoryforpublicbodies
creatingpublicresourcesorfinancingtheircreationtoacquire rightsallowingthemtomake the
resourcesavailable,copyandmodify(thiswill probablyinclude derivative works).There will be 4
degreesof openness.Inotherwords,the publicbodyunderobligationtomake itsresources
available shouldbe able tochoose one of 4 models(options):
(a) The basicoption – makingthe resourcesavailable withoutgrantinganyfurtherexploitation
rights.I am afraidit isnot entirelyclear –perhapsitmeansthere will be nolicensesforusers,so
that userswouldhave torelyon copyrightexceptions.
(b) The intermediateoption –a license withrestrictions,e.g.prohibitingcommercialuse,
excludingderivative works,territorial limitations,etc.
(c) The full option –license withoutrestrictions,allowingall use,sublicensing,modifying,etc.

7. (d) “Embargo” – makingresourcesopenafteracertainperiodof time,forexample allowingfor
commercial exploitation(suchaspublishinginajournal).The embargoperiodshouldnotexceed
12 monthsafterpublicationor20 monthsfromsubmittingthe workforpublication.“Embargo”
wouldbe onlyallowedinjustifiedcases,i.e.shouldbe treatedasanexception,howeveritisalso
notedthat insome casesit maybe necessary,asotherwise private partiescouldbe reluctantto
cooperate withpublicbodies.
Publicresourcesshouldnotonlybe made available –theyshouldbe alsokeptupto date.
PublicresourcesprotectedbyIPrights(esp.copyright)willbe made available underlicense
contracts, otherresourcesunder‘normal’civillaw contracts.The publicbodywill be consideredan
‘offerer”andthe termsof conditionswouldhave toconformtoregulationsonunfaircontract
terms.However,itisalsoproposedthatthe detailedtemplatesof licensingcontractsshouldbe
introducedbya regulationissuedbythe Council of Ministers.
The proposal dealsnotonlywith the legal side of the makingavailableprocess,butalsowithits
technical andfunctional aspects.Itisrecommendedthatall publicresourcesshouldbe made
available inacentral repositoryandinotherrepositoriesbutinthe lattercase theyshouldemploy
technical standardsallowingfortheir‘federation’withthe central repositoryandwithEuropean
systems(suchasEUROPEANA or DRIVER).Metadata mustbe used,indicatingauthors,type of
license,originof the work.Nofurtherdetailshave beenprovided.

8. The publicbodieswill be obligatedtodesignate resourcesprotectedbycopyright.If there isno
such mark,the resource will be consideredanofficial documentormaterial inthe meaningof art.
4 of the PolishCopyrightAct,orsubject-matternotprotectedbycopyright.InPolandofficial
documentsandmaterialsare excludedfromcopyrightprotection.ItisI thinkimpossibleforthis
ideato become law,because itwouldmeanthatcopyrightworkscouldbe excludedfrom
copyrightprotectiondue todeliberate ornegligentomissionbya publicbody(failure tomark
correctlythe copyrightstatusof a work).The publicbodywill have toclearlydefine the termsand
conditionsof makingitsresourcesavailable.
As to the problemof fees,the draft statesthatpublicbodieswill have a‘certain’leewayin
determiningthe conditions(includingremuneration) of re-use forcommercial purposes.Theywill
be also allowedtointroduce some restrictionssuchasthe obligationtoindicate source,tomake
the recoursesfurtheravailabletootherusersinan unchangedform, toindicate the scope of
modifications,toprohibitmodifications,toregulate the scope of liabilityof the publicbody.The
proposal doesnotofferanydetailsasto how and to whatextentsuchrestrictionsshouldbe
allowed.
Finally,inp.III.6the draft liststhe general principles/guidelinesof makingpublicresources
available:the principlesof openness,availability,quality,usefulness,non-discrimination,
transparencyandnon-exclusivity,while acknowledgingthattheycannotbe alwaysfully
implemented.
What seemsinterestingisthatwhennaminglaws/statutesthatshouldbe amendedbythe new
proposedlegislationthe draftfailstomentionthe CopyrightAct,orany otherlawsconcerning
intellectual propertyforthatmatter.The periodforpublicbodiestoadjustto the requirementsof
the newlawshouldbe 12 months.

9. Althoughthe above describedproposalsare onlythe beginningof discussion(of course thisisa
short summary,butI believe,includingall the mostimportantelements) theirfuzzinessshouldnot
be overlooked.If youwouldlike togeta clearerpicture of whatisintendedhere youwould
probablyendupwithsomethinglikethis:the law will generallyobligatetomake publicresources
publiclyavailable,butdoesnotreallydefine whatthesepublicresourcesare.Publicbodiesshould
alwaysacquire IPrightsnecessarytomake protectedsubject-matteravailableonline,buthow this
will looklike inpractise isdifficulttotell andmaycause quite substantial costsforthe state (public
bodies).Whatispublicshouldbe made publiclyavailable,butthere are tobe degreesof openness
and bindingcontracttemplates.There maybe fees,butonlyincertaincases.Inbetweenone may
findrathercontroversial solutionsconcerningintellectual property,butnoIPlegal acts are to be
amended.
The consultationperiodendsonthe 5thof February2013. Since the documentwasmade
available onDecember21, 2012 thisisa veryshorttime,especiallyconsideringthe vaguenessand
“openness”of the draftproposal (here notnecessarilyawelcome trait).Now thereare probably
manymore questionsthananswers.
I needinthis investment:

10. * repositoryof case-relateddataleggalyoriented.
* Legal Inteligence
* Geographicdata of local media.
* ResearchTeam
* Real Time Research
* Email Extractor
* Communitysharinginformationsystem
* International lawfirm
The Operation:
A sophisticatedandunifiedtreatmentof the economic,political,legal,andadministrative
elementsof publicfinance isneeded.Unificationwouldrepresentatradition,but formoderns
sophisticationcanbe attainedonlybyrethinkingoldproblemsandusingnew techniques.Muchof

11. contemporarypublicfinance canbe describedasbeing incharacter,Inthe former,fiscal
phenomenaarise throughcomplex processesof exchange;inthe latter,theyarise throughactsof
choice by some maximizingagent.atrend towardscontractingbeingusedtofurtheran
organization’smission.Contractingisastrategicmanagementtool,notjustatechnique toachieve
betterproductsor servicesinthe shortterm.Strategiccontractingsetscontractingrightat the
centre of any government’spublicmanagementstrategy.Thismeansthattopexecutivesinthe
publicsectormustbe aware of contractingas a phenomenon,
contractingmay be usedto boostactivityinthe private sector.Forindustrial policyreasons,
governmentsmaywishtoencourage growthina certainkindof sectoror among certaingroupsof
companies.Usingcontractingtoallow private companiestowinmore
contracts isa well-knowntechnique forgovernments.Some companiesorindustriesbecome
almostdependenton the willingnessof governmentstocontract forservicesandproducts.The
Americandefence industryisawell-knownexampleof this.Manyof the
bigweaponsandaircraft companiesreceive muchof theirincome fromthe USDefence
Department.Likewisewith NASA whichdependedonmanyorganizationsthatworkchieflyfor
them.InEurope and the Asia-Pacificareathere islessdependence between
governmentsandwhole industriesalthoughthere are examplesof long-termcontractsinboth
areas.
Contractingmaybe usedstrategicallytofurthercertainsectorsinacountry.For manyyears
the Danishpublicsectorhas toyedwiththe ideaof exportingwelfaresystems.The ideaisthatif
Denmarkisa leadingnationinwelfare statessystems,thenothercountriescouldbenefit.
Contractingoutis goingto helpDanishfirmsinestablishingreputationsandgainingknowledge as
world-classproviders,andthisassetmaybe marketedinothercountries.The Falckcompany
whichrunsmost of the country’sambulancesand extinquishesfiresisacase inpoint.Falcklaid
the foundationsfortheirlaterinternationalstrategybybeingakeyprovidertoDanishlocal
government.Ineedrepositoryof case-relateddataleggalyorientedtoanalyze businessby
businessthismarkek causal happenings,
for example:

12. Case and analyses:
-Contractingoutfor railwayservices.
Duringthe last daysof December2001, the DanishMinisterforTransportmade a
decisiontoawarda contract forrailwayservicestothe Danishsubsidiary of the Britishowned
companyArriva.The railwayrouteswere inpartsof Jutland,the peninsularof
Denmark.The Danishrailwaysystemhadbeenmostlyrunbythe publicenterprise
DanishState Railways(Danske StatsBaner) (DSB).The exceptionswere small local
railwaysthatwere runby private providersoncontractwithlocal governments.The most
usedrailwaytrackshad beenstate-runforovera century.
The governmenthadchangedinNovember2001. A Liberal-Conservative government
had takenoverfroma Social Democratgovernment.The previousSocial Democrat

13. MinisterforTransport hadbeensceptical of privatizationandcontractingout.The
incomingMinisterforTransportfromthe Conservative Partywasgenerallyinfavourof
privatizationandcontractingout.The stakeswere thatif private providerswere not
allowedtorunrailwayservicesthistime around,fewdoubtedthatprivate providers
wouldevergainentryintothe market,andthat DSB wouldbe the sole playeronthe
marketfor years to come.The decisionwastherefore anticipatedwithexcitement.
The decisiontoaward the contract to Arrivacame as a surprise tomany,not leastthe
publicenterpriseDSB.DSBhad undergone along-termefficiencystrategysince the
early1990s where ithadmade huge efficiencygainsandcut downcosts.DSB had
preparedcarefullyformakinganefficientbidtowinthe contract. DSB submittedthe
cheapestbid,andhad the track record forrunningrailways.DSBwastherefore very
surprisedwhenitturnedoutthatthe contract wasawardedto Arriva.Arrivawas
pleasantlysurprisedof course.The companyhasalreadybeenresponsible forthe

14. operationof busesinthe GreaterCopenhagenareasince the 1990s.
DSB submittedanenquirytothe Ministerfor transport.DSB firstrefusedtoaccept
that the publicenterprisehadlostthe contract.The ManagingDirectorof DSB saidthat
DSB knewthe route inside outandknew how muchit wouldcostto run the service
efficientlyandwell.The chairmanof the Boardand the Directorarrangeda meetingwith
the Minister,butlittle wasresolvedatthe meeting.The MinisterforTransportremained
steadfastinhisdecision.The reasonforturningdownDSB’sofferwasthatit wasjudged
to be unrealisticallycheap. Inshort,the MinisterdidnotbelievethatDSB’scalculationof
costs waspossible toimplement.Arriva,onthe otherhand,waspleasedtobe the
providerof trainservicesinadditiontothe busservicesitwasalreadyresponsiblefor.
Mediareports announcingthroughoutJanuary2001 that Arriva’spoorrunningof
selectedservicesinBritainhadledtofinesdidnotseemtoaffectArriva’sstandingin
Denmark.Arrivawasnowgoingto be a biggercompanywitha much largerportfolio
in Denmark,andwoulduse thatto make furtherexpansionplans.

15. To the efficiencyof the labof sectorial investmentinforexamplePoland,Ineedalegal intelligence
systemtodynamize the publicconstructionpolice,dothe evaluationof legislationinvolves
comparingthe real worldeffectsof a preferencestructure imposedbylegislationagainstan
external preference structure,imposedbysocallednormsof analysis.Thisiswhatallowschoice
betweenalternative codificationsof political goals.Also that–judgedagainstthe normsof analysis
– twoverydifferentlegislativesolutions,forinstance taxingandprohibiting,canachieve the same
policygoalsbecause of complex interactionsbetweenlegal normsandpresumednon-legal
preferencesof the addressee of legislation.Inbothcases,the solutiontothisproblemrequires
usinglegal andnon-legal preference structuresinasingle decisionproblem,asasystemitmust
presentamethodsof constructionof information-retrieval thesauri (informationretrieval context,
analysisof terminology,terminology-basedconcepts,asmall setof relationtypes) performance
figuresestimate notonlythe qualityof the automaticcategorizationbutalsothe qualityof the
manual categorization,itsinconsistencyand low recall.The concept-basedapproachto
representationof categoriesallows todemonstrate these problemstothe companywhobeganto
seekwaysto improve the situation.
The inteligence of the companyandit'slegal andparalegal aparatusmust also computesa system
of multilateral demandfrombasical groupsandunstructuredonestoreachone of it'smeansand
goalsthat isdistribute political endeavors,forita accurate andreal time systemof learningof
local mediaalsoa systemof communication thatmightdistributeunstructurallyandstructurally
structural mediainthe space thatis beenworkedtieingandnetingcampusesof infomative
circulationthatact as free circulatoryentityof the demandsthathas beenandmightbe
stucturalized.
The value of gross inPolandforexample isestimatedtoUSD 105,2 billionayear;inRomany USD
28,44 billion;inSãoPauloUSD264,77 billion.

16. Real time researchmustbe placedto determine the meaningof conventionswhenquestionsof
applicationare raisedinthe reportsthatratifyinggovernmentsmustsubmitperiodicallyon
national lawandpracticesexaminingingreaterdepthaparticularconventionorgroupof
conventions,whichhasbeendeterminedbyobservationsdealingwithgovernmentsandcountry-
level compliance,engaginginsurveillance consideringinformationreceivedfromsourcesother
than governmentsexaminingdiscriminationinthe absence of statisticsonthe size of the labor
force,itscomposition(bysex,age,andrace),andwagesbygender,thisrequiresknowledgeof
theircontentandthe institutional frameworksinwhichtheyoperate.