Rough Draft Due: April 19th, 2017 Final Draft Due: May 3rd, 2017 FORMAT AND REQUIREMENTS Rough draft: 3-4 pages double-spaced, Times New Roman 12pt font, 1-inch margins, no cover page. Final Draft: 5-6 pages double spaced, Times New Roman 12pt font, 1-inch margins, no cover page In “Being WEIRD,” Ethan Watters looks at the work of social scientist Joseph Henrich, whose research challenged long-held beliefs that humans share inherent psychological traits. Henrich’s study of the “Ultimatum game” outside the industrial West showed that thinking and decision-making processes are heavily shaped by culture; culture shapes how people perceive the world around them, as well as their relationship to it, maybe even more than originally assumed. Heinrich's research paper, co-authored with Steven Heine and Ara Norenzayan, finds that Americans are significantly overrepresented in all kinds of scientific studies while also being the most “weird” (by which Henrich et al. mean Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic). The research by Henrich and his colleagues put culture at the front of all kinds of experimental human research: as Watters puts it, “if human cognition is shaped by cultural ideas and behavior, it can’t be studied without taking into account what those ideas and behaviors are and how they are different from place to place” (499). Watter’s “Being WEIRD” Contributes to the field of science, most specifically anthropology and psychology, in many ways. His essay could be used as a starting point for analyzing how specific aspects of American culture affect its citizens’ psyches and decisionmaking. Assignment Objectives: For this paper, you will choose ONE aspect of American culture and use Watters' "Being WEIRD," to form an argumentative analysis of how this cultural aspect affects individuals in the United States. You should include at least one reference to another text we have read as a class thus far. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION: Argument: Argument directly and fully answers the prompt; is clearly stated early in the paper; is original, compelling and logical, avoiding absolute claims. Evidence: Appropriate amount of relevant, accurate, and justifiably interpreted quotation. Quotations are thoroughly introduced, explained, analyzed, and connected to argument/other texts. Possible counter-arguments are considered. Organization: Paragraphs maintain argumentative focus, exclude extraneous information, appear in a logical order, and transition smoothly. Introduction sets forth argument and goals of essa. Conclusion opens up avenues for future research. Audience: Consistent, academic tone. Appropriate amount of contextual information, anticipating audience questions. Addresses significant issues and makes them important to audience. No first or second person pronouns. Grammar and Format: Errors in grammar, spelling, and usage limited or non-existent. Correct MLA format, ...