SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 67
C A S E
The Case for Open
Heart Surgery
at Cabarrus
Memorial Hospital
Situation
It was a clear, crisp October morning in Concord, North
Carolina.
The board of trustees of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital gathered
in
the windowless, walnut paneled boardroom for its monthly
meet-
ing (see Exhibit 19/1 for board members). Board chairman
George
Batte opened the meeting saying, “Because we do not have an
open heart surgery program, patients needing open heart surgery
or coronary angioplasty have to be transferred to another hospi-
tal, causing inconvenience to the patient’s families and risks
from
delayed treatment. There are several questions we have to
answer in
addressing this issue. Should we add open heart surgery to the
mix
of cardiac services we offer? Does the hospital’s existing
service area
provide adequate patient volumes to support the program? What
This case was written by Fred H. Campbell, The University of
North Carolina at
Charlotte, and Darise D. Caldwell, Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating
Officer, Northeast Medical Center. It is intended as a basis for
classroom discussion
rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling
of an administrative
situation. Used with permission from Fred Campbell.
19
both19.indd 803both19.indd 803 11/11/08 12:32:09
PM11/11/08 12:32:09 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 4
role should the Duke University Medical Center play in the
proposed program? Will
we be able to obtain the required certificate of need [CON] from
the State of North
Carolina’s Department of Health and Human Services? Will
there be opposition
to the CON from surrounding hospitals? What costs are likely to
be incurred in
the required renovation, construction, medical equipment, and
staffing?”
He continued, “As you all know, one of the factors pressing a
quick decision
is the desire of Dr. R. S. “Chris” Christy to return to the staff of
the hospital after
completing his fellowship in cardiovascular surgery. He is being
heavily recruited
by other medical centers.”
Mr. Batte then asked Bob Wall, president of Cabarrus Memorial
Hospital
(CMH), to address the board on the issue. Mr. Wall said, “As
we all know, our
cardiac catheterization service is run by a Duke Medical Center
physician. Our
intent has been for the surgical portion of the heart program to
be provided
by Duke. Dr. Christy is completing a heart surgery residency
through the Sanger
Clinic and wants to return to Concord to practice. Needless to
say, we face a
dilemma and there are very different points of view in our
medical staff as to the
structure and relationship involved in developing a full-fledged
heart program
at CMH. I bring this to your attention now because Dr. Christy
has to make a
career choice before January 1st.”
Trustee Batte reminded everyone, “Dr. Christy grew up in our
community and
worked part-time in the hospital while in high school and
college. After medi-
cal school and a residency in general surgery, he practiced here
at CMH prior
to leaving to complete his fellowship in cardiovascular surgery.
Dr. Christy was
very popular among the staff and patients and I, for one, very
much want to see
him return.” (See Exhibit 19/2 for Dr. Christy’s biography.)
The board had to make its decision about the future of the
cardiac program at
CMH before offering Dr. Christy a position; however, it was
clear that Dr. Christy
could not wait too much longer to be offered a position by
CMH. He had received
multiple offers but, if he delayed, the offers might be
withdrawn.
History of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital
The General Assembly of North Carolina passed legislation in
1935 that enabled
Cabarrus County to establish a public hospital. Through the
guidance of
Mr. Charles A. Cannon, owner of Cannon Mills, the area’s
largest employer, and
Exhibit 19/1: CMH Board of Trustees
Mr. George A. Batte, Jr., Chairman (Retired Manufacturing
Executive)
Mr. L. D. Coltrane, III, Vice Chairman (Telephone Company
President)
Mr. Robert L. Wall (President, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital)
Mr. Dan Gray, Secretary (Executive Director, Charitable
Foundation)
Mr. Durwood Bost, CPA (Retired Manufacturing Executive)
Mr. S. W. Colerider, Jr. (Retired Manufacturing Executive)
Mr. Gene Verble (Merchant and Retired Major League Baseball
Player)
Mrs. Margaret C. West (Civic Leader)
both19.indd 804both19.indd 804 11/11/08 12:32:10
PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM
8 0 5
other community leaders, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital was
established and opened
for patients on July 26, 1937. The original facility had 50
inpatient beds and a staff
of 19 employees. The first addition of 100 beds was completed
in 1940. A second
addition opened in 1951 and brought the total bed capacity to
339. A construction
and renovation program, started in 1969, expanded the total
licensed capacity to
350 acute care beds and 30 bassinets. The adult bed capacity
was increased to
457 beds through a 1982 construction project that modernized
and consolidated
many of the hospital’s services.
Duke Medical Center – CMH Affiliation
CMH had several educational affiliation programs and extensive
in-service and
continuing education programs, including a unique teaching
arrangement with
Duke University Medical Center. The formal affiliation with
Duke included regular
sessions on general and specialty medical topics and patient-
directed teaching
conferences used as an additional education tool (see Exhibit
19/3). This Duke
affiliation had begun to seed many specialists at CMH,
including a cardiologist,
whose practice was rapidly growing.
CMH was a modern, well-equipped facility. Mr. Cannon, as
owner of the large
Cannon Mills, had wanted the thousands of Cannon Mills’
employees to have the
very best health care. His generosity and interest in the hospital
had made the Duke
affiliation possible. It has been said that he carried the hospital
on the mill’s books
as “plant 13.” Certainly his philanthropy had in fact made it a
much more advanced
medical center than those in other communities the size of
Cabarrus County.
The Cardiac Program at CMH
For several years, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital had increased
the availability
of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular services to the
community. CMH
had as members of the active medical staff one invasive
cardiologist and three
Exhibit 19/2: Dr. R. S. “Chris” Christy
Ralph S. “Chris” Christy was born July 26, 1957 at Cabarrus
Memorial Hospital. He was one of two
children born to Steve and Rachel Christy, hardworking owners
of Christy’s Nursery in Concord. Chris
was educated in the Cabarrus County School system and played
football for NorthWest Cabarrus
High School. He married Kay Moore, also from Concord, in
1977 and together they embarked on the
adventure of Chris becoming a physician. Chris graduated from
Davidson College with a BS and
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a medical
degree. He then attended a surgical
residency program at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah.
After his residency, Chris returned
to Concord and joined the surgical practice of Flowe, Crooke
and Chalfant. Two years later, Chris
entered the Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Fellowship program
at Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte,
North Carolina. Under the tutelage of Dr. Frances Robicsek, a
well-known and respected pioneer in
open-heart surgery, Dr. Christy developed the expert cardiac
surgery skills that he wanted to bring
to Cabarrus Memorial Hospital.
T H E C A R D I A C P R O G R A M AT C M H
both19.indd 805both19.indd 805 11/11/08 12:32:10
PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 6
Exhibit 19/3: Cabarrus Memorial Hospital – Duke University
Medical Center Education
Affiliation
As early as 1966, the United States government launched a
series of planning grants for regional
medical programs for heart, cancer, and stroke patients. Under
this federal proposal Cabarrus Memorial
Hospital was to be affiliated with Duke University Medical
Center. The Duke – CMH program began in
1968 with Duke faculty members leading training sessions for
CMH’s doctors and nurses at Salisbury’s
Rowan Technical Institute.
Dr. George Engstrom recalled, “CMH medical staff wanted a
more direct educational affiliation
with Duke. Dr. Ladd Hamrick, CMH internist, talked with Dr.
Eugene Stead at Duke and a stronger
affiliation was proposed. After the discussions with Duke, CMH
president Wall, Dr. Bob Hammonds,
and Dr. Hamrick took the proposal for the expanded educational
affiliation proposals to George
Batte, chairman of CMH board’s executive committee.” Dr.
Engstrom continued, “They presented the
program in 15 minutes and Mr. Batte’s response was, ‘Do you
think it will work?’ The answer was
‘yes’ and his response was, ‘I think we can get the money . . .’
The critical funding for the program
came from The Cannon Foundation through the leadership of
Mr. Batte.”
As Dr. Hamrick said, “The affiliation forged in 1972 became ‘a
powerhouse.’” The successful
Duke –Cabarrus liaison was to become a model program for
other health centers, for it brought not
only Duke medical specialists to CMH, but also spurred
seminars, classes, and studies with other
nationally recognized physicians and researchers.
The basic agreement was that fellows “from five of Duke’s
divisions of internal medicine began to
travel for two 48-hour periods per month to function as
educational consultants to the general internists.”
Actually, Duke faculty members from other departments began
to travel to Cabarrus. The affiliation
required that patient contact with Duke physicians be
educational for Cabarrus doctors. The Cabarrus
activities were to include consultations on educational matters,
presenting conferences, reviewing clinical
studies, assisting in surgery, and teaching new or different
procedures and techniques, among others.
In 1973, Dr. Galen Wagner of Duke’s Cardiology faculty, was
appointed Department of Medicine
coordinator. In 1974, Dr. Tom Long of Duke’s gastroenterology
faculty was named Cabarrus-based
coordinator for the Department of Medicine. He ultimately
moved to Cabarrus County where he con-
tinued his medical practice and affiliation work.
Under the affiliation, visiting medical professors from such
highly regarded universities as Harvard,
Stanford, Vanderbilt, University of Pittsburgh, and even
medical leaders from foreign countries, came
to teach and consult at Cabarrus Memorial Hospital.
According to Dr. Long, “By 1992 there had been 14,703 Duke
visits to Cabarrus; 55,826 clinical
consultations; 7,636 physicians conferences; and 77,792
continuing medical education hours credited
to CMH physicians.” He further noted the many benefits to
CMH: “Cabarrus doctors received con-
tinuing education through Duke conferences; quality physicians
were attracted to the community;
conferences between Duke and Cabarrus doctors about patients
were free; medical expertise and
new skills were provided; doctor interest in sophisticated
patient care was maintained; and new
‘cutting edge’ technology was developed.”
internists that specialized in treatment of heart diseases. A
second invasive
cardiologist and another noninvasive cardiologist were expected
to join the staff
in the next year. Dr. Christy would potentially become the first
cardiovascular
surgeon on the staff if the board elected to proceed and was
successful in receiv-
ing the CON.
The scope of the CMH cardiology services included an
emergency room staffed
and equipped for treatment of cardiac emergencies, an eight-bed
coronary care
unit, cardiac catheterization, and cardiac rehabilitation. (See
Exhibit 19/4 for a
both19.indd 806both19.indd 806 11/11/08 12:32:10
PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM
8 0 7
glossary of related medical terms.) In addition, the hospital had
capabilities
for numerous cardiovascular diagnostic and therapeutic
services. Electro-
diagnostic services included electrocardiograms, cardiac
Doppler studies, echo
EKGs, exercise EKG studies, and Holter monitoring. The
magnetic resonance imag-
ing (MRI) unit had cardiac imaging capabilities. The nuclear
medicine department
had equipment for nuclear cardiac and thallium scanning.
Temporary and perma-
nent pacemaker insertions, thrombolytic therapy through
streptokinase and TPA
infusions, and Swan Ganz catheter insertions were examples of
the hospital’s
treatment capabilities.
The new program being considered would include one open
heart surgical suite
for adult procedures, with the capacity for 400 procedures per
year. Angioplasty
would be offered in the existing cardiac catheterization
laboratory. It was
projected that by the end of the third year, three dedicated
cardiac surgical ICU
beds and seven telemetry beds would be required to support the
open heart
Exhibit 19/4: Glossary
Angioplasty – The insertion of a catheter into the coronary
arteries including inflation of a balloon
to squeeze coronary artery plaque formation to decrease
blockages
Cardiac Doppler Studies – An imaging study of the heart using
ultrasound that involved measure-
ment of pressures in different chambers of the heart, also used
to evaluate the valves of the
heart
Cardiologist – A physician who attained fellowship training in
diseases of the heart and cardio-
vascular system
Certificate of Need (CON) – Authorization by the State of North
Carolina, Department of Health
and Human Services, Division of Facility Services to proceed
with expenditures for new health
facility/equipment
Echocardiography – Diagnostic heart study using ultrasound
technology to demonstrate the physical
functioning of the heart
Electrocardiogram (EKG) – A trace of the electrical currents
that initiated the heartbeat; used to
diagnose possible heart disorders
Epidemiology – The study of the health and diseases of
populations
Exercise EKG – An electrocardiogram performed when the
patient was exercising, usually on a
treadmill
Holter Monitor – A diagnostic tool that utilized an extended
wearing of an electrocardiogram mon-
itor with which the patient transmitted events telephonically
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) – A specialized patient care unit
within a hospital utilized by patients who
required constant, high level of care
Invasive Cardiologist – A cardiologist who performed invasive
procedures such as angioplasty
Noninvasive Cardiologist – A cardiologist who specialized in
medical treatment of heart disease rather
than performing invasive procedures
Nuclear Medicine – A field of diagnostic imaging that utilized
nucleotide particles injected into the
patient, then evaluated with a nuclear camera to produce an
image
Swan Ganz Catheter – A pressure catheter that was inserted into
the right side of the heart to
measure the performance of the heart
Telemetry – The monitoring of the conduction patterns of the
heart through radio wave transmission
from a remote area to a central location
Thrombolytic Therapy – The use of “clot dissolving” drugs to
open blocked arteries
T H E C A R D I A C P R O G R A M AT C M H
both19.indd 807both19.indd 807 11/11/08 12:32:11
PM11/11/08 12:32:11 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 8
surgery program. Existing space would need to be renovated to
accommodate
the various service components.
The additional cardiac service being considered would provide
patients of
CMH with a full-service cardiology program consistent with
programs available
at other community hospitals and with service areas comparable
in size to the
CMH service area. The programs and large expenditures would
assure continuity
of care for patients who received initial cardiac care at CMH. If
the board decided
not to commit to expanding the cardiac program, CMH patients
needing open
heart surgery or coronary angioplasty would continue to be
transferred to another
hospital in the region, such as Duke.
Decision Factors
A major part of the board of trustees’ consideration was
whether or not there
existed a large enough service area to sufficiently support open
heart surgery
and the expansion of the existing cardiac services. They wanted
to know what
population threshold would be required. Did they have enough
population in the
hospital’s existing service area? The trustees, in making their
expansion decision,
looked at a number of factors. They included: (1) the primary
and secondary service
areas based on historical data; (2) population growth; (3)
population epidemiology;
(4) availability of existing open heart surgery medical centers;
(5) accessibility
to cardiac surgery programs; (6) continuity of cardiology care;
and (7) rate of
demand for open heart surgery. The hospital’s planning staff,
directed by vice
president Glenn Reed, provided data on each of the areas.
1. Primary and Secondary Service Areas
To determine the service area for the proposed heart program
expansion, the
existing service area for the hospital was identified by
examining the hospital’s
patient database and noting the patients’ residential addresses,
particularly zip
codes. Second, they mapped this service area and evaluated the
road and trans-
portation network, travel times, and other hospitals in the
region. (See Exhibits
19/5 and 19/6.)
In board discussions, president Wall advised the trustees that
hospital plan-
ners had looked at patient origins for an existing tertiary
program – radiation
oncology. This study showed that its major source of patients
had been Concord
and Kannapolis, with the remainder widely spread over 23 other
communities.
Mr. Wall asked, “Does this give us reason to believe we can
expect referrals to
CMH for open heart surgery to come from a wider service area
than the hos-
pital average?” (See Exhibits 19/7 and 19/8.)
To further look at the question of patient origins, CMH studied
zip code
origins for its cardiac catheterization patients. Again, a large
number of patients
had Concord and Kannapolis zip codes and generally reflected
patient origins
both19.indd 808both19.indd 808 11/11/08 12:32:11
PM11/11/08 12:32:11 PM
Exhibit 19/5 Cabarrus Memorial Hospital Patient Origin
County % Patient Origin
Cabarrus 80.1
Rowan 9.4
Stanly 7.2
Other 3.3
TOTAL 100.0
Note: “Other” includes Union, Mecklenburg, Davie, Davidson,
Iredell, and Lincoln counties.
Source: Hospital Patient Origin Report (North Carolina Medical
Database Commission).
R O W A N
C A B A R R U S
S T A N L Y
M E C K L E N B U R G
U N I O N
Charlotte
Salisbury
Concord
Monroe
Albemarle
Kannapolis
Mooresville
3
9
6
1
7
8
*
*
*
**
*
*4
*
29
*
5
49
2 29
601
601
77
601
85
85
I R E D E L L
Exhibit 19/6: Map of CMH Service Area
Key: 1. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital
2. Rowan Memorial Hospital
3. Stanly Memorial Hospital
4. Union Memorial Hospital
5. University Memorial Hospital
6. Mercy Hospital
7. Presbyterian Hospital
8. Carolinas Medical Center
9. Lowrance Hospital
both19.indd 809both19.indd 809 11/11/08 12:32:12
PM11/11/08 12:32:12 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 0
similar to those of the radiation oncology program. Again the
board wondered if
this indicated the open heart program would draw patients from
a service area
that would include parts or all of six counties: Cabarrus,
Rowan, Stanly, Union,
Iredell, and Mecklenburg. The outside boundaries of these
counties are within
60 miles of Concord, the site of CMH.
Mr. Wall questioned, “What would further analysis of the
historical data lead
planners to conclude about the program’s primary service area?
Could it serve as
much as 70 percent of Cabarrus and a third of Rowan County?
Would the second-
ary service area include parts of Stanly, Union, Mecklenburg,
and Iredell Counties?
What percentage of the population in those counties lived
within 40 miles of CMH?
Would this comprise a secondary service area large enough?”
A major demographic factor driving the perceived demand for
open heart
surgery at CMH was population growth. According to the
Government and
Business Services Branch of the State Library of North
Carolina, total population
for these six counties was expected to increase 18.3 percent
over the next ten years.
Therefore, even if open heart surgery usage rates remained
constant each year,
counties in this service area could have expected at least 18
percent more open
heart surgery cases over the ten year period. (See Exhibit 19/9.)
2. Growth of At-Risk Population
A second major demographic factor driving the demand for open
heart sur-
gery was growth of the at-risk population. According to
projections from the
recent census, the number of people aged 45 to 64, the
population most likely to
Exhibit 19/8: Proposed CMH Open Heart Service Population
County Population Market
Cabarrus 69,255 70.0
Rowan 40,813 36.9
Stanly 7,661 14.8
Union 1,516 1.8
Mecklenburg 1,534 0.3
Iredell 651 0.7
Exhibit 19/7: CMH Patient Origin (%) Previous Year
County Radiation Oncology Heart Catheterization
Cabarrus 57.4 59.3
Rowan 16.0 30.4
Stanly 19.7 7.3
Other 6.9 3.0
TOTAL 100.0 100.0
both19.indd 810both19.indd 810 11/11/08 12:32:13
PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM
8 1 1
suffer occlusive coronary artery disease, was predicted to grow
by 38.3 percent
in the next ten years, a rate more than twice that of the general
population. (See
Exhibit 19/10.)
3. Population Epidemiology
Based on the latest available data, all the proposed service area
counties, with the
exception of Union and Mecklenburg, had evidence of a heart
disease mortality
rate higher than that of the state as a whole (see Exhibit 19/11).
According to
the data that had been recently reported by the North Carolina
Database
Commission, open heart surgery usage rates in Cabarrus County
were higher
than that of the entire state. The previous year North Carolina
had experienced a
procedure rate of 1.39 per 1,000 population.
4. Availability of Existing Services for Patients in CMH
Service Area
North Carolina had 16 open heart surgery programs located in
11 counties.
None of these programs was in the proposed CMH primary
service area. Those
closest to the CMH service area were located in Charlotte. They
were Mercy
Exhibit 19/9: Ten-Year Projection: Service Area Population
Growth
County Year 1 Year 2 Change (%)
Cabarrus 98,935 112,802 14.0
Rowan 110,605 122,268 10.5
Stanly 51,765 55,185 6.6
Union 84,211 99,644 18.3
Mecklenburg 511,433 630,005 23.2
Iredell 92,931 103,820 11.7
TOTAL 949,880 1,123,724 18.3
Exhibit 19/10: Growth of At-Risk Population: Aged 45 to 64
Previous Year 10 years Change (%)
Cabarrus 20,419 26,797 31.2
Rowan 22,729 28,348 24.7
Stanly 10,691 12,761 19.4
Union 16,458 23,290 41.5
Mecklenburg 91,747 135,154 47.3
Iredell 19,950 25,504 27.8
TOTAL 181,994 251,854 38.4
D E C I S I O N F A C T O R S
both19.indd 811both19.indd 811 11/11/08 12:32:13
PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 2
Hospital, Presbyterian Hospital, and Carolinas Medical Center,
all located about
25 miles from CMH.
Only one of the state’s 16 programs had claimed Cabarrus
County in its primary
service area. That claim had been made eight years earlier by
Carolinas Medical
Center when it opened its service. Since that time, Carolinas
Medical Center had
drawn only 5.6 percent of its patients from Cabarrus County,
suggesting to the
CMH board that Cabarrus patient volumes at Carolinas Medical
Center did not
warrant being included in Carolinas Medical Center’s primary
service area.
The three Charlotte programs had reported previous year
operating room uti-
lization for cardiac surgery as follows: Mercy Hospital, 36.3
percent; Presbyterian
Hospital, 78.5 percent; and Carolinas Medical Center, 84.5
percent. Procedure
volume had increased yearly at both Presbyterian and Carolinas
Medical Center.
Presbyterian, with its two open heart surgery suites operating at
78.5 percent of
nominal capacity, apparently needed its operating rooms.
Carolinas Medical Center, with its six rooms classified as
combined “open heart
surgery/thoracic suites,” had submitted a CON application for
an additional open
heart surgery room. However, earlier in the year, it had
subsequently withdrawn
its application for a CON. For the Department of Facilities
Services to award a
CON, the existing utilization rate for the cardiac surgery suite
was required to
be at 80 percent or higher.
Procedure volume at Mercy Hospital had not followed a year-to-
year growth
pattern. Room utilization had been well under 50 percent each
year for the pre-
vious ten years. Moreover, Mercy did not appear to reach the
proposed CMH
open heart service area. In the previous year only 9 percent of
the 174 people
from Cabarrus County, and none from Rowan County, had
received open heart
surgery at Mercy. The pattern indicated a perceived or real
barrier to access at
Mercy by people in the CMH area counties. Generally, Mercy
appeared to serve
a population that was more south and east of Charlotte.
5. Accessibility to Cardiac Surgery Programs
The existing open heart surgery programs in Charlotte,
Winston-Salem, and
Greensboro were 25 to 60 miles from the service population.
Although this seemed
Exhibit 19/11: Heart Disease Mortality Rates: Two Years
Previous
County Death Rate/1,000 Population
Rowan 375.8
Cabarrus 320.7
Stanly 326.0
Union 246.5
Mecklenburg 225.0
Iredell 325.2
North Carolina 288.6
both19.indd 812both19.indd 812 11/11/08 12:32:13
PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM
8 1 3
relatively close for a one-time procedure, it was inconvenient
for persons traveling
repeatedly for diagnosis, family support, and follow-up care.
“Driving to Charlotte is becoming more and more of a
problem,” commented
a board member. “I am often asked why we can’t provide more
care in Cabarrus
County.”
Heart patients from the CMH area had to travel to existing
services along com-
binations of country roads and heavily congested traffic
arteries. Travel time was
from one to two hours. Congestion and delay were expected to
further increase
the time as the Charlotte metropolitan area continued to grow 3
percent per year,
a rate triple that of the state.
Moreover, to many residents of the CMH service area, Charlotte
was a big
city and confusing for drivers from out of town. Its perceived
distance was
farther than its actual distance because of the delays in city
travel. This had
been noted with the opening of radiation oncology at CMH.
Patient volumes
were much higher than expected. Surveys of patients and
families cited dis-
tance, lack of transportation, and fear of the city as reasons for
not having
obtained radiation treatments at distant sites that had been
recommended by
their physicians.
As part of the affiliation between Duke University Medical
Center and
Cabarrus Memorial hospital, two Duke open heart surgeons, Jim
Lowe, MD,
and Peter Smith, MD, participated in monthly conferences at
CMH and con-
sulted on patient candidates for open heart surgery. Those
patient consulta-
tions became referrals to Duke when surgery was indicated. The
medical staff
suggested that the patient trip of 120 miles to Duke would be
eliminated if
open heart surgery of equal quality could be performed at CMH,
as was being
proposed. However, it was expected that a few cases needing
specialized care
would still be referred to Duke (or other medical centers) after
the CMH pro-
gram was opened. Approximately 40 percent of CMH cardiac
catheterization
referrals were going to Duke.
6. Continuity of Cardiology Care
Continuity of care for the cardiology patient was critical.
Quality was enhanced
when patient transfers were minimized, medical and nursing
staff were con-
stant, and staff and technology for diagnostic and therapeutic
interventions were
maintained. To obtain the desired level of care, CMH patients
were being trans-
ferred to other facilities when cardiac surgery was indicated.
This transfer dis-
rupted continuity.
According to the North Carolina Database Commission, for the
previous
year, 174 Cabarrus County and 118 Rowan County residents
received open
heart surgery in one of the following hospitals: Duke University
Medical Center,
Presbyterian Hospital, Carolinas Medical Center, NC Baptist
Hospitals, and a
few others. For many of those 292 patients, a CMH-based open
heart surgery
service would have avoided transfers and ensured continuity of
cardiology care.
(See Exhibit 19/12.)
D E C I S I O N F A C T O R S
both19.indd 813both19.indd 813 11/11/08 12:32:14
PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 4
The scope and comprehensiveness of cardiology services at
CMH had expanded
yearly. Two years previously, CMH had initiated its cardiac
catheterization pro-
gram. In the past year, the CMH program referred 117 patients
to open heart
surgery and 82 to angioplasty. In addition, Rowan Memorial
Hospital, located in
Salisbury (a half-hour’s drive to the north), had opened a
cardiac catheterization
service and could have been considered another referral source
for the proposed
CMH program. The next logical step in the continuity of cardiac
care was argued
to be the open heart surgery program. Availability of open heart
surgery and
angioplasty would have provided invasive options for treatment
of coronary artery
disease and reduced outside referrals to a small percentage of
patients. A physi-
cian board member commented, “It is time this becomes a full-
service hospital.
Cabarrus County deserves it and cardiac surgery will be just the
beginning.”
7. Growth in Demand
Over the previous ten years, North Carolina open heart surgery
volume
had increased an average of 26 percent a year. Moreover,
statistical forecasts had
predicted continued increases in use rate per 1,000 population
for the next five
years. The rate of 0.43 open heart surgeries per 1,000
population ten years ago
had increased to 1.39 per 1,000. Cardiac catheterization was the
major diagnostic
procedure that resulted in a recommendation for open heart
surgery. Changes in
cardiac catheterization volumes were, therefore, important to
predict open heart
demand at a particular location. North Carolina cardiac
catheterization volume
had grown at an average annual rate of 16.2 percent over the
prior nine years.
Although the rate of growth was slowing, anecdotal projections
and trended fore-
casts predicted continued growth for the next five years.
The state’s cardiac catheterization to open heart procedure ratio
had also
increased annually. Over the past year, the ratio had increased
to 4.54 adult
catheterizations for each open heart procedure. Similar to the
annual growth rate
for open heart surgery procedures, this ratio was also growing.
Exhibit 19/12: Where Cabarrus-Rowan Residents Received
Open Heart Surgery: Previous
Year
Destination Hospital Cabarrus Residents Rowan Residents Total
Duke University Medical Center 28 16 44
Presbyterian Hospital 68 25 93
Mercy Hospital 9 0 9
Carolinas Medical Center 66 44 110
NC Baptist Hospitals 0 28 28
Unknown 3 5 8
TOTAL 174 118 292
both19.indd 814both19.indd 814 11/11/08 12:32:14
PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM
8 1 5
Financial Considerations
In addition to market demand and trend analysis, the board was
faced with the
financial aspect of the decision. President Wall asked the CFO
to present the financial
data. An open heart surgery program would incur a number of
expenses. In addi-
tion to Dr. Christy and his surgical team, there would be a need
for 23 additional
employees in year 1, growing to 39 in year 3 (see Exhibit
19/13).
It was projected there would be a need for ten beds licensed as
acute care beds,
not then being utilized, to become operational as coronary care
beds. Addition-
ally there would be a need for three intensive care unit (ICU)
beds, and the one
new open heart operating suite.
A total of 5,811 sq. ft. of hospital space would require
renovation. Projected
capital costs, including construction and equipment, were
$3,273,180. The hos-
pital had sufficient reserve funds to underwrite the renovation
project and the
additional equipment without borrowing money.
Exhibit 19/13: CMH Open Heart Staffing Plan
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
53 Procedures 106 Procedures 211 Procedures
Operating Room
Nurse Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00
RN 2.50 3.50 6.00
OR Tech 2.00 2.00 3.00
OR Aide/Transport 0.50 0.50 1.00
CRNA 1.00 1.50 3.00
Anesthesia Tech 0.50 0.50 1.00
Respiratory Therapist 1.00 1.50 3.00
Subtotal 8.50 10.50 18.00
Surgery/Recovery
Nurse Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50
RN 4.00 4.00 7.00
Ward Secretary 0.50 0.50 0.50
Subtotal 5.00 5.00 8.00
Telemetry Unit
Nurse Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50
RN 3.00 4.00 7.00
Monitor Tech 3.00 3.00 3.00
Ward Secretary 0.50 0.50 0.50
Subtotal 7.00 8.00 11.00
Nurse Educator 0.50 0.50 0.50
Angioplasty RN 1.00 1.00 1.00
Angioplasty Tech 1.00 1.00 1.00
Subtotal 2.50 2.50 2.50
TOTAL 23.00 26.00 39.50
F I N A N C I A L C O N S I D E R AT I O N S
both19.indd 815both19.indd 815 11/11/08 12:32:14
PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 6
Direct costs for the open heart program were projected to be
$2,364,214 in year
1, $3,217,739 in year 2, and $5,438,392 in year 3 (see Exhibit
19/14). Average length
of stay per open heart patient was projected to be nine days.
Projected average open heart surgery fees per case were $13,000
without
catheterization and $15,000 with catheterization. These
estimates represented
full, nonprofessional fees and the surgeon’s fee, as well as other
professional
components such as anesthesia, pathology, and radiology.
Average room and board charges were estimated at $826 per
day. All ancillaries
were projected at $3,725 per day. Total average projected
charge for each open
heart surgery procedure was $40,957.
The Meeting Draws to a Close
President Wall and various members of the hospital staff had
presented the
findings to the trustees. The data and information had been
collected, tabulated,
and analyzed. It was time to make a decision. Should CMH go
ahead with an
application for a certificate of need for an open heart surgery
program? As they
sat there waiting for someone to speak, Mrs. West asked, “Mr.
Batte, what do
you think we should do? Do we go for the CON?”
Exhibit 19/14: Open Heart Program Costs
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Direct Costs
Clinical Personnel $711,793 $910,878 $1,695,457
Administrative Personnel 136,565 147,490 159,289
Support Personnel 52,764 56,985 61,544
Personnel Taxes/Benefits 180,224 223,071 383,258
Medical Supplies 315,947 746,439 1,749,771
Other Supplies 15,950 68,980 75,445
Depreciation, Equipment 243,376 243,376 243,376
Plant Operations and Maintenance 48,087 52,415 57,132
Other Associated Expenses
(Angioplasty) 449,965 534,033 615,723
Other Associated Expenses 99,543 99,212 99,212
Contracted Services 110,000 134,860 298,185
Total Direct Costs 2,364,214 3,217,739 5,438,392
Indirect Costs
General and Administrative 255,966 302,376 416,862
Other Overhead 73,200 88,630 175,473
Depreciation, Building 43,525 43,525 43,525
Other Property, Ownership
and Use Expense 2,036 2,402 2,835
Consultant Services 122,740 153,399 154,699
Rowan Community Outreach 6,183 6,739 7,346
Total Indirect Costs 503,650 597,071 800,740
Total Costs $2,867,864 $3,814,810 $6,239,132
both19.indd 816both19.indd 816 11/11/08 12:32:15
PM11/11/08 12:32:15 PM
C A S E
The Case for Open
Heart Surgery
at Cabarrus
Memorial Hospital
Situation
It was a clear, crisp October morning in Concord, North
Carolina.
The board of trustees of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital gathered
in
the windowless, walnut paneled boardroom for its monthly
meet-
ing (see Exhibit 19/1 for board members). Board chairman
George
Batte opened the meeting saying, “Because we do not have an
open heart surgery program, patients needing open heart surgery
or coronary angioplasty have to be transferred to another hospi-
tal, causing inconvenience to the patient’s families and risks
from
delayed treatment. There are several questions we have to
answer in
addressing this issue. Should we add open heart surgery to the
mix
of cardiac services we offer? Does the hospital’s existing
service area
provide adequate patient volumes to support the program? What
This case was written by Fred H. Campbell, The University of
North Carolina at
Charlotte, and Darise D. Caldwell, Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating
Officer, Northeast Medical Center. It is intended as a basis for
classroom discussion
rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling
of an administrative
situation. Used with permission from Fred Campbell.
19
both19.indd 803both19.indd 803 11/11/08 12:32:09
PM11/11/08 12:32:09 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 4
role should the Duke University Medical Center play in the
proposed program? Will
we be able to obtain the required certificate of need [CON] from
the State of North
Carolina’s Department of Health and Human Services? Will
there be opposition
to the CON from surrounding hospitals? What costs are likely to
be incurred in
the required renovation, construction, medical equipment, and
staffing?”
He continued, “As you all know, one of the factors pressing a
quick decision
is the desire of Dr. R. S. “Chris” Christy to return to the staff of
the hospital after
completing his fellowship in cardiovascular surgery. He is being
heavily recruited
by other medical centers.”
Mr. Batte then asked Bob Wall, president of Cabarrus Memorial
Hospital
(CMH), to address the board on the issue. Mr. Wall said, “As
we all know, our
cardiac catheterization service is run by a Duke Medical Center
physician. Our
intent has been for the surgical portion of the heart program to
be provided
by Duke. Dr. Christy is completing a heart surgery residency
through the Sanger
Clinic and wants to return to Concord to practice. Needless to
say, we face a
dilemma and there are very different points of view in our
medical staff as to the
structure and relationship involved in developing a full-fledged
heart program
at CMH. I bring this to your attention now because Dr. Christy
has to make a
career choice before January 1st.”
Trustee Batte reminded everyone, “Dr. Christy grew up in our
community and
worked part-time in the hospital while in high school and
college. After medi-
cal school and a residency in general surgery, he practiced here
at CMH prior
to leaving to complete his fellowship in cardiovascular surgery.
Dr. Christy was
very popular among the staff and patients and I, for one, very
much want to see
him return.” (See Exhibit 19/2 for Dr. Christy’s biography.)
The board had to make its decision about the future of the
cardiac program at
CMH before offering Dr. Christy a position; however, it was
clear that Dr. Christy
could not wait too much longer to be offered a position by
CMH. He had received
multiple offers but, if he delayed, the offers might be
withdrawn.
History of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital
The General Assembly of North Carolina passed legislation in
1935 that enabled
Cabarrus County to establish a public hospital. Through the
guidance of
Mr. Charles A. Cannon, owner of Cannon Mills, the area’s
largest employer, and
Exhibit 19/1: CMH Board of Trustees
Mr. George A. Batte, Jr., Chairman (Retired Manufacturing
Executive)
Mr. L. D. Coltrane, III, Vice Chairman (Telephone Company
President)
Mr. Robert L. Wall (President, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital)
Mr. Dan Gray, Secretary (Executive Director, Charitable
Foundation)
Mr. Durwood Bost, CPA (Retired Manufacturing Executive)
Mr. S. W. Colerider, Jr. (Retired Manufacturing Executive)
Mr. Gene Verble (Merchant and Retired Major League Baseball
Player)
Mrs. Margaret C. West (Civic Leader)
both19.indd 804both19.indd 804 11/11/08 12:32:10
PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM
8 0 5
other community leaders, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital was
established and opened
for patients on July 26, 1937. The original facility had 50
inpatient beds and a staff
of 19 employees. The first addition of 100 beds was completed
in 1940. A second
addition opened in 1951 and brought the total bed capacity to
339. A construction
and renovation program, started in 1969, expanded the total
licensed capacity to
350 acute care beds and 30 bassinets. The adult bed capacity
was increased to
457 beds through a 1982 construction project that modernized
and consolidated
many of the hospital’s services.
Duke Medical Center – CMH Affiliation
CMH had several educational affiliation programs and extensive
in-service and
continuing education programs, including a unique teaching
arrangement with
Duke University Medical Center. The formal affiliation with
Duke included regular
sessions on general and specialty medical topics and patient-
directed teaching
conferences used as an additional education tool (see Exhibit
19/3). This Duke
affiliation had begun to seed many specialists at CMH,
including a cardiologist,
whose practice was rapidly growing.
CMH was a modern, well-equipped facility. Mr. Cannon, as
owner of the large
Cannon Mills, had wanted the thousands of Cannon Mills’
employees to have the
very best health care. His generosity and interest in the hospital
had made the Duke
affiliation possible. It has been said that he carried the hospital
on the mill’s books
as “plant 13.” Certainly his philanthropy had in fact made it a
much more advanced
medical center than those in other communities the size of
Cabarrus County.
The Cardiac Program at CMH
For several years, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital had increased
the availability
of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular services to the
community. CMH
had as members of the active medical staff one invasive
cardiologist and three
Exhibit 19/2: Dr. R. S. “Chris” Christy
Ralph S. “Chris” Christy was born July 26, 1957 at Cabarrus
Memorial Hospital. He was one of two
children born to Steve and Rachel Christy, hardworking owners
of Christy’s Nursery in Concord. Chris
was educated in the Cabarrus County School system and played
football for NorthWest Cabarrus
High School. He married Kay Moore, also from Concord, in
1977 and together they embarked on the
adventure of Chris becoming a physician. Chris graduated from
Davidson College with a BS and
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a medical
degree. He then attended a surgical
residency program at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah.
After his residency, Chris returned
to Concord and joined the surgical practice of Flowe, Crooke
and Chalfant. Two years later, Chris
entered the Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Fellowship program
at Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte,
North Carolina. Under the tutelage of Dr. Frances Robicsek, a
well-known and respected pioneer in
open-heart surgery, Dr. Christy developed the expert cardiac
surgery skills that he wanted to bring
to Cabarrus Memorial Hospital.
T H E C A R D I A C P R O G R A M AT C M H
both19.indd 805both19.indd 805 11/11/08 12:32:10
PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 6
Exhibit 19/3: Cabarrus Memorial Hospital – Duke University
Medical Center Education
Affiliation
As early as 1966, the United States government launched a
series of planning grants for regional
medical programs for heart, cancer, and stroke patients. Under
this federal proposal Cabarrus Memorial
Hospital was to be affiliated with Duke University Medical
Center. The Duke – CMH program began in
1968 with Duke faculty members leading training sessions for
CMH’s doctors and nurses at Salisbury’s
Rowan Technical Institute.
Dr. George Engstrom recalled, “CMH medical staff wanted a
more direct educational affiliation
with Duke. Dr. Ladd Hamrick, CMH internist, talked with Dr.
Eugene Stead at Duke and a stronger
affiliation was proposed. After the discussions with Duke, CMH
president Wall, Dr. Bob Hammonds,
and Dr. Hamrick took the proposal for the expanded educational
affiliation proposals to George
Batte, chairman of CMH board’s executive committee.” Dr.
Engstrom continued, “They presented the
program in 15 minutes and Mr. Batte’s response was, ‘Do you
think it will work?’ The answer was
‘yes’ and his response was, ‘I think we can get the money . . .’
The critical funding for the program
came from The Cannon Foundation through the leadership of
Mr. Batte.”
As Dr. Hamrick said, “The affiliation forged in 1972 became ‘a
powerhouse.’” The successful
Duke –Cabarrus liaison was to become a model program for
other health centers, for it brought not
only Duke medical specialists to CMH, but also spurred
seminars, classes, and studies with other
nationally recognized physicians and researchers.
The basic agreement was that fellows “from five of Duke’s
divisions of internal medicine began to
travel for two 48-hour periods per month to function as
educational consultants to the general internists.”
Actually, Duke faculty members from other departments began
to travel to Cabarrus. The affiliation
required that patient contact with Duke physicians be
educational for Cabarrus doctors. The Cabarrus
activities were to include consultations on educational matters,
presenting conferences, reviewing clinical
studies, assisting in surgery, and teaching new or different
procedures and techniques, among others.
In 1973, Dr. Galen Wagner of Duke’s Cardiology faculty, was
appointed Department of Medicine
coordinator. In 1974, Dr. Tom Long of Duke’s gastroenterology
faculty was named Cabarrus-based
coordinator for the Department of Medicine. He ultimately
moved to Cabarrus County where he con-
tinued his medical practice and affiliation work.
Under the affiliation, visiting medical professors from such
highly regarded universities as Harvard,
Stanford, Vanderbilt, University of Pittsburgh, and even
medical leaders from foreign countries, came
to teach and consult at Cabarrus Memorial Hospital.
According to Dr. Long, “By 1992 there had been 14,703 Duke
visits to Cabarrus; 55,826 clinical
consultations; 7,636 physicians conferences; and 77,792
continuing medical education hours credited
to CMH physicians.” He further noted the many benefits to
CMH: “Cabarrus doctors received con-
tinuing education through Duke conferences; quality physicians
were attracted to the community;
conferences between Duke and Cabarrus doctors about patients
were free; medical expertise and
new skills were provided; doctor interest in sophisticated
patient care was maintained; and new
‘cutting edge’ technology was developed.”
internists that specialized in treatment of heart diseases. A
second invasive
cardiologist and another noninvasive cardiologist were expected
to join the staff
in the next year. Dr. Christy would potentially become the first
cardiovascular
surgeon on the staff if the board elected to proceed and was
successful in receiv-
ing the CON.
The scope of the CMH cardiology services included an
emergency room staffed
and equipped for treatment of cardiac emergencies, an eight-bed
coronary care
unit, cardiac catheterization, and cardiac rehabilitation. (See
Exhibit 19/4 for a
both19.indd 806both19.indd 806 11/11/08 12:32:10
PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM
8 0 7
glossary of related medical terms.) In addition, the hospital had
capabilities
for numerous cardiovascular diagnostic and therapeutic
services. Electro-
diagnostic services included electrocardiograms, cardiac
Doppler studies, echo
EKGs, exercise EKG studies, and Holter monitoring. The
magnetic resonance imag-
ing (MRI) unit had cardiac imaging capabilities. The nuclear
medicine department
had equipment for nuclear cardiac and thallium scanning.
Temporary and perma-
nent pacemaker insertions, thrombolytic therapy through
streptokinase and TPA
infusions, and Swan Ganz catheter insertions were examples of
the hospital’s
treatment capabilities.
The new program being considered would include one open
heart surgical suite
for adult procedures, with the capacity for 400 procedures per
year. Angioplasty
would be offered in the existing cardiac catheterization
laboratory. It was
projected that by the end of the third year, three dedicated
cardiac surgical ICU
beds and seven telemetry beds would be required to support the
open heart
Exhibit 19/4: Glossary
Angioplasty – The insertion of a catheter into the coronary
arteries including inflation of a balloon
to squeeze coronary artery plaque formation to decrease
blockages
Cardiac Doppler Studies – An imaging study of the heart using
ultrasound that involved measure-
ment of pressures in different chambers of the heart, also used
to evaluate the valves of the
heart
Cardiologist – A physician who attained fellowship training in
diseases of the heart and cardio-
vascular system
Certificate of Need (CON) – Authorization by the State of North
Carolina, Department of Health
and Human Services, Division of Facility Services to proceed
with expenditures for new health
facility/equipment
Echocardiography – Diagnostic heart study using ultrasound
technology to demonstrate the physical
functioning of the heart
Electrocardiogram (EKG) – A trace of the electrical currents
that initiated the heartbeat; used to
diagnose possible heart disorders
Epidemiology – The study of the health and diseases of
populations
Exercise EKG – An electrocardiogram performed when the
patient was exercising, usually on a
treadmill
Holter Monitor – A diagnostic tool that utilized an extended
wearing of an electrocardiogram mon-
itor with which the patient transmitted events telephonically
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) – A specialized patient care unit
within a hospital utilized by patients who
required constant, high level of care
Invasive Cardiologist – A cardiologist who performed invasive
procedures such as angioplasty
Noninvasive Cardiologist – A cardiologist who specialized in
medical treatment of heart disease rather
than performing invasive procedures
Nuclear Medicine – A field of diagnostic imaging that utilized
nucleotide particles injected into the
patient, then evaluated with a nuclear camera to produce an
image
Swan Ganz Catheter – A pressure catheter that was inserted into
the right side of the heart to
measure the performance of the heart
Telemetry – The monitoring of the conduction patterns of the
heart through radio wave transmission
from a remote area to a central location
Thrombolytic Therapy – The use of “clot dissolving” drugs to
open blocked arteries
T H E C A R D I A C P R O G R A M AT C M H
both19.indd 807both19.indd 807 11/11/08 12:32:11
PM11/11/08 12:32:11 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 8
surgery program. Existing space would need to be renovated to
accommodate
the various service components.
The additional cardiac service being considered would provide
patients of
CMH with a full-service cardiology program consistent with
programs available
at other community hospitals and with service areas comparable
in size to the
CMH service area. The programs and large expenditures would
assure continuity
of care for patients who received initial cardiac care at CMH. If
the board decided
not to commit to expanding the cardiac program, CMH patients
needing open
heart surgery or coronary angioplasty would continue to be
transferred to another
hospital in the region, such as Duke.
Decision Factors
A major part of the board of trustees’ consideration was
whether or not there
existed a large enough service area to sufficiently support open
heart surgery
and the expansion of the existing cardiac services. They wanted
to know what
population threshold would be required. Did they have enough
population in the
hospital’s existing service area? The trustees, in making their
expansion decision,
looked at a number of factors. They included: (1) the primary
and secondary service
areas based on historical data; (2) population growth; (3)
population epidemiology;
(4) availability of existing open heart surgery medical centers;
(5) accessibility
to cardiac surgery programs; (6) continuity of cardiology care;
and (7) rate of
demand for open heart surgery. The hospital’s planning staff,
directed by vice
president Glenn Reed, provided data on each of the areas.
1. Primary and Secondary Service Areas
To determine the service area for the proposed heart program
expansion, the
existing service area for the hospital was identified by
examining the hospital’s
patient database and noting the patients’ residential addresses,
particularly zip
codes. Second, they mapped this service area and evaluated the
road and trans-
portation network, travel times, and other hospitals in the
region. (See Exhibits
19/5 and 19/6.)
In board discussions, president Wall advised the trustees that
hospital plan-
ners had looked at patient origins for an existing tertiary
program – radiation
oncology. This study showed that its major source of patients
had been Concord
and Kannapolis, with the remainder widely spread over 23 other
communities.
Mr. Wall asked, “Does this give us reason to believe we can
expect referrals to
CMH for open heart surgery to come from a wider service area
than the hos-
pital average?” (See Exhibits 19/7 and 19/8.)
To further look at the question of patient origins, CMH studied
zip code
origins for its cardiac catheterization patients. Again, a large
number of patients
had Concord and Kannapolis zip codes and generally reflected
patient origins
both19.indd 808both19.indd 808 11/11/08 12:32:11
PM11/11/08 12:32:11 PM
Exhibit 19/5 Cabarrus Memorial Hospital Patient Origin
County % Patient Origin
Cabarrus 80.1
Rowan 9.4
Stanly 7.2
Other 3.3
TOTAL 100.0
Note: “Other” includes Union, Mecklenburg, Davie, Davidson,
Iredell, and Lincoln counties.
Source: Hospital Patient Origin Report (North Carolina Medical
Database Commission).
R O W A N
C A B A R R U S
S T A N L Y
M E C K L E N B U R G
U N I O N
Charlotte
Salisbury
Concord
Monroe
Albemarle
Kannapolis
Mooresville
3
9
6
1
7
8
*
*
*
**
*
*4
*
29
*
5
49
2 29
601
601
77
601
85
85
I R E D E L L
Exhibit 19/6: Map of CMH Service Area
Key: 1. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital
2. Rowan Memorial Hospital
3. Stanly Memorial Hospital
4. Union Memorial Hospital
5. University Memorial Hospital
6. Mercy Hospital
7. Presbyterian Hospital
8. Carolinas Medical Center
9. Lowrance Hospital
both19.indd 809both19.indd 809 11/11/08 12:32:12
PM11/11/08 12:32:12 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 0
similar to those of the radiation oncology program. Again the
board wondered if
this indicated the open heart program would draw patients from
a service area
that would include parts or all of six counties: Cabarrus,
Rowan, Stanly, Union,
Iredell, and Mecklenburg. The outside boundaries of these
counties are within
60 miles of Concord, the site of CMH.
Mr. Wall questioned, “What would further analysis of the
historical data lead
planners to conclude about the program’s primary service area?
Could it serve as
much as 70 percent of Cabarrus and a third of Rowan County?
Would the second-
ary service area include parts of Stanly, Union, Mecklenburg,
and Iredell Counties?
What percentage of the population in those counties lived
within 40 miles of CMH?
Would this comprise a secondary service area large enough?”
A major demographic factor driving the perceived demand for
open heart
surgery at CMH was population growth. According to the
Government and
Business Services Branch of the State Library of North
Carolina, total population
for these six counties was expected to increase 18.3 percent
over the next ten years.
Therefore, even if open heart surgery usage rates remained
constant each year,
counties in this service area could have expected at least 18
percent more open
heart surgery cases over the ten year period. (See Exhibit 19/9.)
2. Growth of At-Risk Population
A second major demographic factor driving the demand for open
heart sur-
gery was growth of the at-risk population. According to
projections from the
recent census, the number of people aged 45 to 64, the
population most likely to
Exhibit 19/8: Proposed CMH Open Heart Service Population
County Population Market
Cabarrus 69,255 70.0
Rowan 40,813 36.9
Stanly 7,661 14.8
Union 1,516 1.8
Mecklenburg 1,534 0.3
Iredell 651 0.7
Exhibit 19/7: CMH Patient Origin (%) Previous Year
County Radiation Oncology Heart Catheterization
Cabarrus 57.4 59.3
Rowan 16.0 30.4
Stanly 19.7 7.3
Other 6.9 3.0
TOTAL 100.0 100.0
both19.indd 810both19.indd 810 11/11/08 12:32:13
PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM
8 1 1
suffer occlusive coronary artery disease, was predicted to grow
by 38.3 percent
in the next ten years, a rate more than twice that of the general
population. (See
Exhibit 19/10.)
3. Population Epidemiology
Based on the latest available data, all the proposed service area
counties, with the
exception of Union and Mecklenburg, had evidence of a heart
disease mortality
rate higher than that of the state as a whole (see Exhibit 19/11).
According to
the data that had been recently reported by the North Carolina
Database
Commission, open heart surgery usage rates in Cabarrus County
were higher
than that of the entire state. The previous year North Carolina
had experienced a
procedure rate of 1.39 per 1,000 population.
4. Availability of Existing Services for Patients in CMH
Service Area
North Carolina had 16 open heart surgery programs located in
11 counties.
None of these programs was in the proposed CMH primary
service area. Those
closest to the CMH service area were located in Charlotte. They
were Mercy
Exhibit 19/9: Ten-Year Projection: Service Area Population
Growth
County Year 1 Year 2 Change (%)
Cabarrus 98,935 112,802 14.0
Rowan 110,605 122,268 10.5
Stanly 51,765 55,185 6.6
Union 84,211 99,644 18.3
Mecklenburg 511,433 630,005 23.2
Iredell 92,931 103,820 11.7
TOTAL 949,880 1,123,724 18.3
Exhibit 19/10: Growth of At-Risk Population: Aged 45 to 64
Previous Year 10 years Change (%)
Cabarrus 20,419 26,797 31.2
Rowan 22,729 28,348 24.7
Stanly 10,691 12,761 19.4
Union 16,458 23,290 41.5
Mecklenburg 91,747 135,154 47.3
Iredell 19,950 25,504 27.8
TOTAL 181,994 251,854 38.4
D E C I S I O N F A C T O R S
both19.indd 811both19.indd 811 11/11/08 12:32:13
PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 2
Hospital, Presbyterian Hospital, and Carolinas Medical Center,
all located about
25 miles from CMH.
Only one of the state’s 16 programs had claimed Cabarrus
County in its primary
service area. That claim had been made eight years earlier by
Carolinas Medical
Center when it opened its service. Since that time, Carolinas
Medical Center had
drawn only 5.6 percent of its patients from Cabarrus County,
suggesting to the
CMH board that Cabarrus patient volumes at Carolinas Medical
Center did not
warrant being included in Carolinas Medical Center’s primary
service area.
The three Charlotte programs had reported previous year
operating room uti-
lization for cardiac surgery as follows: Mercy Hospital, 36.3
percent; Presbyterian
Hospital, 78.5 percent; and Carolinas Medical Center, 84.5
percent. Procedure
volume had increased yearly at both Presbyterian and Carolinas
Medical Center.
Presbyterian, with its two open heart surgery suites operating at
78.5 percent of
nominal capacity, apparently needed its operating rooms.
Carolinas Medical Center, with its six rooms classified as
combined “open heart
surgery/thoracic suites,” had submitted a CON application for
an additional open
heart surgery room. However, earlier in the year, it had
subsequently withdrawn
its application for a CON. For the Department of Facilities
Services to award a
CON, the existing utilization rate for the cardiac surgery suite
was required to
be at 80 percent or higher.
Procedure volume at Mercy Hospital had not followed a year-to-
year growth
pattern. Room utilization had been well under 50 percent each
year for the pre-
vious ten years. Moreover, Mercy did not appear to reach the
proposed CMH
open heart service area. In the previous year only 9 percent of
the 174 people
from Cabarrus County, and none from Rowan County, had
received open heart
surgery at Mercy. The pattern indicated a perceived or real
barrier to access at
Mercy by people in the CMH area counties. Generally, Mercy
appeared to serve
a population that was more south and east of Charlotte.
5. Accessibility to Cardiac Surgery Programs
The existing open heart surgery programs in Charlotte,
Winston-Salem, and
Greensboro were 25 to 60 miles from the service population.
Although this seemed
Exhibit 19/11: Heart Disease Mortality Rates: Two Years
Previous
County Death Rate/1,000 Population
Rowan 375.8
Cabarrus 320.7
Stanly 326.0
Union 246.5
Mecklenburg 225.0
Iredell 325.2
North Carolina 288.6
both19.indd 812both19.indd 812 11/11/08 12:32:13
PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM
8 1 3
relatively close for a one-time procedure, it was inconvenient
for persons traveling
repeatedly for diagnosis, family support, and follow-up care.
“Driving to Charlotte is becoming more and more of a
problem,” commented
a board member. “I am often asked why we can’t provide more
care in Cabarrus
County.”
Heart patients from the CMH area had to travel to existing
services along com-
binations of country roads and heavily congested traffic
arteries. Travel time was
from one to two hours. Congestion and delay were expected to
further increase
the time as the Charlotte metropolitan area continued to grow 3
percent per year,
a rate triple that of the state.
Moreover, to many residents of the CMH service area, Charlotte
was a big
city and confusing for drivers from out of town. Its perceived
distance was
farther than its actual distance because of the delays in city
travel. This had
been noted with the opening of radiation oncology at CMH.
Patient volumes
were much higher than expected. Surveys of patients and
families cited dis-
tance, lack of transportation, and fear of the city as reasons for
not having
obtained radiation treatments at distant sites that had been
recommended by
their physicians.
As part of the affiliation between Duke University Medical
Center and
Cabarrus Memorial hospital, two Duke open heart surgeons, Jim
Lowe, MD,
and Peter Smith, MD, participated in monthly conferences at
CMH and con-
sulted on patient candidates for open heart surgery. Those
patient consulta-
tions became referrals to Duke when surgery was indicated. The
medical staff
suggested that the patient trip of 120 miles to Duke would be
eliminated if
open heart surgery of equal quality could be performed at CMH,
as was being
proposed. However, it was expected that a few cases needing
specialized care
would still be referred to Duke (or other medical centers) after
the CMH pro-
gram was opened. Approximately 40 percent of CMH cardiac
catheterization
referrals were going to Duke.
6. Continuity of Cardiology Care
Continuity of care for the cardiology patient was critical.
Quality was enhanced
when patient transfers were minimized, medical and nursing
staff were con-
stant, and staff and technology for diagnostic and therapeutic
interventions were
maintained. To obtain the desired level of care, CMH patients
were being trans-
ferred to other facilities when cardiac surgery was indicated.
This transfer dis-
rupted continuity.
According to the North Carolina Database Commission, for the
previous
year, 174 Cabarrus County and 118 Rowan County residents
received open
heart surgery in one of the following hospitals: Duke University
Medical Center,
Presbyterian Hospital, Carolinas Medical Center, NC Baptist
Hospitals, and a
few others. For many of those 292 patients, a CMH-based open
heart surgery
service would have avoided transfers and ensured continuity of
cardiology care.
(See Exhibit 19/12.)
D E C I S I O N F A C T O R S
both19.indd 813both19.indd 813 11/11/08 12:32:14
PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 4
The scope and comprehensiveness of cardiology services at
CMH had expanded
yearly. Two years previously, CMH had initiated its cardiac
catheterization pro-
gram. In the past year, the CMH program referred 117 patients
to open heart
surgery and 82 to angioplasty. In addition, Rowan Memorial
Hospital, located in
Salisbury (a half-hour’s drive to the north), had opened a
cardiac catheterization
service and could have been considered another referral source
for the proposed
CMH program. The next logical step in the continuity of cardiac
care was argued
to be the open heart surgery program. Availability of open heart
surgery and
angioplasty would have provided invasive options for treatment
of coronary artery
disease and reduced outside referrals to a small percentage of
patients. A physi-
cian board member commented, “It is time this becomes a full-
service hospital.
Cabarrus County deserves it and cardiac surgery will be just the
beginning.”
7. Growth in Demand
Over the previous ten years, North Carolina open heart surgery
volume
had increased an average of 26 percent a year. Moreover,
statistical forecasts had
predicted continued increases in use rate per 1,000 population
for the next five
years. The rate of 0.43 open heart surgeries per 1,000
population ten years ago
had increased to 1.39 per 1,000. Cardiac catheterization was the
major diagnostic
procedure that resulted in a recommendation for open heart
surgery. Changes in
cardiac catheterization volumes were, therefore, important to
predict open heart
demand at a particular location. North Carolina cardiac
catheterization volume
had grown at an average annual rate of 16.2 percent over the
prior nine years.
Although the rate of growth was slowing, anecdotal projections
and trended fore-
casts predicted continued growth for the next five years.
The state’s cardiac catheterization to open heart procedure ratio
had also
increased annually. Over the past year, the ratio had increased
to 4.54 adult
catheterizations for each open heart procedure. Similar to the
annual growth rate
for open heart surgery procedures, this ratio was also growing.
Exhibit 19/12: Where Cabarrus-Rowan Residents Received
Open Heart Surgery: Previous
Year
Destination Hospital Cabarrus Residents Rowan Residents Total
Duke University Medical Center 28 16 44
Presbyterian Hospital 68 25 93
Mercy Hospital 9 0 9
Carolinas Medical Center 66 44 110
NC Baptist Hospitals 0 28 28
Unknown 3 5 8
TOTAL 174 118 292
both19.indd 814both19.indd 814 11/11/08 12:32:14
PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM
8 1 5
Financial Considerations
In addition to market demand and trend analysis, the board was
faced with the
financial aspect of the decision. President Wall asked the CFO
to present the financial
data. An open heart surgery program would incur a number of
expenses. In addi-
tion to Dr. Christy and his surgical team, there would be a need
for 23 additional
employees in year 1, growing to 39 in year 3 (see Exhibit
19/13).
It was projected there would be a need for ten beds licensed as
acute care beds,
not then being utilized, to become operational as coronary care
beds. Addition-
ally there would be a need for three intensive care unit (ICU)
beds, and the one
new open heart operating suite.
A total of 5,811 sq. ft. of hospital space would require
renovation. Projected
capital costs, including construction and equipment, were
$3,273,180. The hos-
pital had sufficient reserve funds to underwrite the renovation
project and the
additional equipment without borrowing money.
Exhibit 19/13: CMH Open Heart Staffing Plan
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
53 Procedures 106 Procedures 211 Procedures
Operating Room
Nurse Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00
RN 2.50 3.50 6.00
OR Tech 2.00 2.00 3.00
OR Aide/Transport 0.50 0.50 1.00
CRNA 1.00 1.50 3.00
Anesthesia Tech 0.50 0.50 1.00
Respiratory Therapist 1.00 1.50 3.00
Subtotal 8.50 10.50 18.00
Surgery/Recovery
Nurse Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50
RN 4.00 4.00 7.00
Ward Secretary 0.50 0.50 0.50
Subtotal 5.00 5.00 8.00
Telemetry Unit
Nurse Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50
RN 3.00 4.00 7.00
Monitor Tech 3.00 3.00 3.00
Ward Secretary 0.50 0.50 0.50
Subtotal 7.00 8.00 11.00
Nurse Educator 0.50 0.50 0.50
Angioplasty RN 1.00 1.00 1.00
Angioplasty Tech 1.00 1.00 1.00
Subtotal 2.50 2.50 2.50
TOTAL 23.00 26.00 39.50
F I N A N C I A L C O N S I D E R AT I O N S
both19.indd 815both19.indd 815 11/11/08 12:32:14
PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM
C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 6
Direct costs for the open heart program were projected to be
$2,364,214 in year
1, $3,217,739 in year 2, and $5,438,392 in year 3 (see Exhibit
19/14). Average length
of stay per open heart patient was projected to be nine days.
Projected average open heart surgery fees per case were $13,000
without
catheterization and $15,000 with catheterization. These
estimates represented
full, nonprofessional fees and the surgeon’s fee, as well as other
professional
components such as anesthesia, pathology, and radiology.
Average room and board charges were estimated at $826 per
day. All ancillaries
were projected at $3,725 per day. Total average projected
charge for each open
heart surgery procedure was $40,957.
The Meeting Draws to a Close
President Wall and various members of the hospital staff had
presented the
findings to the trustees. The data and information had been
collected, tabulated,
and analyzed. It was time to make a decision. Should CMH go
ahead with an
application for a certificate of need for an open heart surgery
program? As they
sat there waiting for someone to speak, Mrs. West asked, “Mr.
Batte, what do
you think we should do? Do we go for the CON?”
Exhibit 19/14: Open Heart Program Costs
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Direct Costs
Clinical Personnel $711,793 $910,878 $1,695,457
Administrative Personnel 136,565 147,490 159,289
Support Personnel 52,764 56,985 61,544
Personnel Taxes/Benefits 180,224 223,071 383,258
Medical Supplies 315,947 746,439 1,749,771
Other Supplies 15,950 68,980 75,445
Depreciation, Equipment 243,376 243,376 243,376
Plant Operations and Maintenance 48,087 52,415 57,132
Other Associated Expenses
(Angioplasty) 449,965 534,033 615,723
Other Associated Expenses 99,543 99,212 99,212
Contracted Services 110,000 134,860 298,185
Total Direct Costs 2,364,214 3,217,739 5,438,392
Indirect Costs
General and Administrative 255,966 302,376 416,862
Other Overhead 73,200 88,630 175,473
Depreciation, Building 43,525 43,525 43,525
Other Property, Ownership
and Use Expense 2,036 2,402 2,835
Consultant Services 122,740 153,399 154,699
Rowan Community Outreach 6,183 6,739 7,346
Total Indirect Costs 503,650 597,071 800,740
Total Costs $2,867,864 $3,814,810 $6,239,132
both19.indd 816both19.indd 816 11/11/08 12:32:15
PM11/11/08 12:32:15 PM

More Related Content

Similar to C A S EThe Case for Open Heart Surgery at Cabarrus.docx

Hospital SystemFor this Dropbox assignment, please read pages .docx
Hospital SystemFor this Dropbox assignment, please read pages .docxHospital SystemFor this Dropbox assignment, please read pages .docx
Hospital SystemFor this Dropbox assignment, please read pages .docxadampcarr67227
 
Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Sc.pdf
 Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Sc.pdf Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Sc.pdf
Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Sc.pdftuffail786
 
2012UPMCCCAnualReport
2012UPMCCCAnualReport2012UPMCCCAnualReport
2012UPMCCCAnualReportSarah Skirpan
 
15KHN0008-0072 Physician Quarterly 2015_Q3 low
15KHN0008-0072 Physician Quarterly 2015_Q3 low15KHN0008-0072 Physician Quarterly 2015_Q3 low
15KHN0008-0072 Physician Quarterly 2015_Q3 lowEmily Dahl
 
Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Scheck.pdf
 Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Scheck.pdf Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Scheck.pdf
Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Scheck.pdftuffail786
 
CASE 14 Cooper Green Hospital and the Community Care PlanAn Ov.docx
CASE 14 Cooper Green Hospital and the Community Care PlanAn Ov.docxCASE 14 Cooper Green Hospital and the Community Care PlanAn Ov.docx
CASE 14 Cooper Green Hospital and the Community Care PlanAn Ov.docxwendolynhalbert
 
An Overworked CEOThere are certain days when life seems unbearab.docx
An Overworked CEOThere are certain days when life seems unbearab.docxAn Overworked CEOThere are certain days when life seems unbearab.docx
An Overworked CEOThere are certain days when life seems unbearab.docxgalerussel59292
 
HHS_WLMH_SOHS_Booklet (1)
HHS_WLMH_SOHS_Booklet (1)HHS_WLMH_SOHS_Booklet (1)
HHS_WLMH_SOHS_Booklet (1)Lauren Lewitzky
 
A small us town scarred by a trusted doctor
A small us town scarred by a trusted doctorA small us town scarred by a trusted doctor
A small us town scarred by a trusted doctorOther Mother
 
NOV_DEC 2010 Connect (2)
NOV_DEC 2010 Connect (2)NOV_DEC 2010 Connect (2)
NOV_DEC 2010 Connect (2)Anne Mancour
 
small part in case study.docx
small part in case study.docxsmall part in case study.docx
small part in case study.docxwrite5
 
Cancer Program Medical Director Honored by Town of Hempstead
Cancer Program Medical Director Honored by Town of HempsteadCancer Program Medical Director Honored by Town of Hempstead
Cancer Program Medical Director Honored by Town of HempsteadSouth Nassau Communities Hospital
 
7th Annual Call-on Congress Summary Report
7th Annual Call-on Congress Summary Report7th Annual Call-on Congress Summary Report
7th Annual Call-on Congress Summary ReportFight Colorectal Cancer
 
FINAL 15-RUMC-3020-Annual-Report-Final_web
FINAL 15-RUMC-3020-Annual-Report-Final_webFINAL 15-RUMC-3020-Annual-Report-Final_web
FINAL 15-RUMC-3020-Annual-Report-Final_webWilliam J Smith, MBA
 
Contracting for success scoping large organizational change
Contracting for success scoping large organizational changeContracting for success scoping large organizational change
Contracting for success scoping large organizational changeAISHA232980
 
Healthy Directions: Winter 2017
Healthy Directions: Winter 2017Healthy Directions: Winter 2017
Healthy Directions: Winter 2017centrastate
 

Similar to C A S EThe Case for Open Heart Surgery at Cabarrus.docx (20)

Hospital SystemFor this Dropbox assignment, please read pages .docx
Hospital SystemFor this Dropbox assignment, please read pages .docxHospital SystemFor this Dropbox assignment, please read pages .docx
Hospital SystemFor this Dropbox assignment, please read pages .docx
 
Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Sc.pdf
 Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Sc.pdf Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Sc.pdf
Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Sc.pdf
 
Living Well - Spring 2018
Living Well - Spring 2018Living Well - Spring 2018
Living Well - Spring 2018
 
2012UPMCCCAnualReport
2012UPMCCCAnualReport2012UPMCCCAnualReport
2012UPMCCCAnualReport
 
CL42-29
CL42-29CL42-29
CL42-29
 
15KHN0008-0072 Physician Quarterly 2015_Q3 low
15KHN0008-0072 Physician Quarterly 2015_Q3 low15KHN0008-0072 Physician Quarterly 2015_Q3 low
15KHN0008-0072 Physician Quarterly 2015_Q3 low
 
UT News Feature
UT News FeatureUT News Feature
UT News Feature
 
Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Scheck.pdf
 Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Scheck.pdf Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Scheck.pdf
Case H The American Heart Institute Sofia V. Agoritsas and Ann Scheck.pdf
 
CASE 14 Cooper Green Hospital and the Community Care PlanAn Ov.docx
CASE 14 Cooper Green Hospital and the Community Care PlanAn Ov.docxCASE 14 Cooper Green Hospital and the Community Care PlanAn Ov.docx
CASE 14 Cooper Green Hospital and the Community Care PlanAn Ov.docx
 
An Overworked CEOThere are certain days when life seems unbearab.docx
An Overworked CEOThere are certain days when life seems unbearab.docxAn Overworked CEOThere are certain days when life seems unbearab.docx
An Overworked CEOThere are certain days when life seems unbearab.docx
 
HHS_WLMH_SOHS_Booklet (1)
HHS_WLMH_SOHS_Booklet (1)HHS_WLMH_SOHS_Booklet (1)
HHS_WLMH_SOHS_Booklet (1)
 
A small us town scarred by a trusted doctor
A small us town scarred by a trusted doctorA small us town scarred by a trusted doctor
A small us town scarred by a trusted doctor
 
NOV_DEC 2010 Connect (2)
NOV_DEC 2010 Connect (2)NOV_DEC 2010 Connect (2)
NOV_DEC 2010 Connect (2)
 
AUG_SEPT Connect
AUG_SEPT ConnectAUG_SEPT Connect
AUG_SEPT Connect
 
small part in case study.docx
small part in case study.docxsmall part in case study.docx
small part in case study.docx
 
Cancer Program Medical Director Honored by Town of Hempstead
Cancer Program Medical Director Honored by Town of HempsteadCancer Program Medical Director Honored by Town of Hempstead
Cancer Program Medical Director Honored by Town of Hempstead
 
7th Annual Call-on Congress Summary Report
7th Annual Call-on Congress Summary Report7th Annual Call-on Congress Summary Report
7th Annual Call-on Congress Summary Report
 
FINAL 15-RUMC-3020-Annual-Report-Final_web
FINAL 15-RUMC-3020-Annual-Report-Final_webFINAL 15-RUMC-3020-Annual-Report-Final_web
FINAL 15-RUMC-3020-Annual-Report-Final_web
 
Contracting for success scoping large organizational change
Contracting for success scoping large organizational changeContracting for success scoping large organizational change
Contracting for success scoping large organizational change
 
Healthy Directions: Winter 2017
Healthy Directions: Winter 2017Healthy Directions: Winter 2017
Healthy Directions: Winter 2017
 

More from RAHUL126667

Applying the Four Principles Case StudyPart 1 Chart (60 points)B.docx
Applying the Four Principles Case StudyPart 1 Chart (60 points)B.docxApplying the Four Principles Case StudyPart 1 Chart (60 points)B.docx
Applying the Four Principles Case StudyPart 1 Chart (60 points)B.docxRAHUL126667
 
APPLYING ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES TO BUSINESS1APPLYING ANALYTIC T.docx
APPLYING ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES TO BUSINESS1APPLYING ANALYTIC T.docxAPPLYING ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES TO BUSINESS1APPLYING ANALYTIC T.docx
APPLYING ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES TO BUSINESS1APPLYING ANALYTIC T.docxRAHUL126667
 
Apply the general overview of court structure in the United States (.docx
Apply the general overview of court structure in the United States (.docxApply the general overview of court structure in the United States (.docx
Apply the general overview of court structure in the United States (.docxRAHUL126667
 
Apply the Paramedic Method to the following five selections.docx
Apply the Paramedic Method to the following five selections.docxApply the Paramedic Method to the following five selections.docx
Apply the Paramedic Method to the following five selections.docxRAHUL126667
 
Application of Standards of CareDiscuss the standard(s) of c.docx
Application of Standards of CareDiscuss the standard(s) of c.docxApplication of Standards of CareDiscuss the standard(s) of c.docx
Application of Standards of CareDiscuss the standard(s) of c.docxRAHUL126667
 
Application of the Nursing Process to Deliver Culturally Compe.docx
Application of the Nursing Process to Deliver Culturally Compe.docxApplication of the Nursing Process to Deliver Culturally Compe.docx
Application of the Nursing Process to Deliver Culturally Compe.docxRAHUL126667
 
Application Ware House-Application DesignAppointyAppoi.docx
Application Ware House-Application DesignAppointyAppoi.docxApplication Ware House-Application DesignAppointyAppoi.docx
Application Ware House-Application DesignAppointyAppoi.docxRAHUL126667
 
Applied Psycholinguistics 31 (2010), 413–438doi10.1017S014.docx
Applied Psycholinguistics 31 (2010), 413–438doi10.1017S014.docxApplied Psycholinguistics 31 (2010), 413–438doi10.1017S014.docx
Applied Psycholinguistics 31 (2010), 413–438doi10.1017S014.docxRAHUL126667
 
Application of the Belmont PrinciplesFirst, identify your .docx
Application of the Belmont PrinciplesFirst, identify your .docxApplication of the Belmont PrinciplesFirst, identify your .docx
Application of the Belmont PrinciplesFirst, identify your .docxRAHUL126667
 
APPLE is only one of the multiple companies that have approved and d.docx
APPLE is only one of the multiple companies that have approved and d.docxAPPLE is only one of the multiple companies that have approved and d.docx
APPLE is only one of the multiple companies that have approved and d.docxRAHUL126667
 
Appliance Warehouse Service Plan.The discussion focuses on the.docx
Appliance Warehouse Service Plan.The discussion focuses on the.docxAppliance Warehouse Service Plan.The discussion focuses on the.docx
Appliance Warehouse Service Plan.The discussion focuses on the.docxRAHUL126667
 
Applicants must submit a 500 essay describing how current or future .docx
Applicants must submit a 500 essay describing how current or future .docxApplicants must submit a 500 essay describing how current or future .docx
Applicants must submit a 500 essay describing how current or future .docxRAHUL126667
 
Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Berkshire Hathaway, and Facebook ha.docx
Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Berkshire Hathaway, and Facebook ha.docxApple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Berkshire Hathaway, and Facebook ha.docx
Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Berkshire Hathaway, and Facebook ha.docxRAHUL126667
 
Appcelerator Titanium was released in December 2008, and has been st.docx
Appcelerator Titanium was released in December 2008, and has been st.docxAppcelerator Titanium was released in December 2008, and has been st.docx
Appcelerator Titanium was released in December 2008, and has been st.docxRAHUL126667
 
APA Style300 words per topic2 peer reviewed resources per to.docx
APA Style300 words per topic2 peer reviewed resources per to.docxAPA Style300 words per topic2 peer reviewed resources per to.docx
APA Style300 words per topic2 peer reviewed resources per to.docxRAHUL126667
 
Ape and Human Cognition What’s theDifferenceMichael To.docx
Ape and Human Cognition What’s theDifferenceMichael To.docxApe and Human Cognition What’s theDifferenceMichael To.docx
Ape and Human Cognition What’s theDifferenceMichael To.docxRAHUL126667
 
Apply what you have learned about Health Promotion and Disease P.docx
Apply what you have learned about Health Promotion and Disease P.docxApply what you have learned about Health Promotion and Disease P.docx
Apply what you have learned about Health Promotion and Disease P.docxRAHUL126667
 
APA formatCite there peer-reviewed, scholarly references300 .docx
APA formatCite there peer-reviewed, scholarly references300 .docxAPA formatCite there peer-reviewed, scholarly references300 .docx
APA formatCite there peer-reviewed, scholarly references300 .docxRAHUL126667
 
APA formatCite 2 peer-reviewed reference175-265 word count.docx
APA formatCite 2 peer-reviewed reference175-265 word count.docxAPA formatCite 2 peer-reviewed reference175-265 word count.docx
APA formatCite 2 peer-reviewed reference175-265 word count.docxRAHUL126667
 
APA formatCite at least 1 referenceWrite a 175- to 265-w.docx
APA formatCite at least 1 referenceWrite a 175- to 265-w.docxAPA formatCite at least 1 referenceWrite a 175- to 265-w.docx
APA formatCite at least 1 referenceWrite a 175- to 265-w.docxRAHUL126667
 

More from RAHUL126667 (20)

Applying the Four Principles Case StudyPart 1 Chart (60 points)B.docx
Applying the Four Principles Case StudyPart 1 Chart (60 points)B.docxApplying the Four Principles Case StudyPart 1 Chart (60 points)B.docx
Applying the Four Principles Case StudyPart 1 Chart (60 points)B.docx
 
APPLYING ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES TO BUSINESS1APPLYING ANALYTIC T.docx
APPLYING ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES TO BUSINESS1APPLYING ANALYTIC T.docxAPPLYING ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES TO BUSINESS1APPLYING ANALYTIC T.docx
APPLYING ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES TO BUSINESS1APPLYING ANALYTIC T.docx
 
Apply the general overview of court structure in the United States (.docx
Apply the general overview of court structure in the United States (.docxApply the general overview of court structure in the United States (.docx
Apply the general overview of court structure in the United States (.docx
 
Apply the Paramedic Method to the following five selections.docx
Apply the Paramedic Method to the following five selections.docxApply the Paramedic Method to the following five selections.docx
Apply the Paramedic Method to the following five selections.docx
 
Application of Standards of CareDiscuss the standard(s) of c.docx
Application of Standards of CareDiscuss the standard(s) of c.docxApplication of Standards of CareDiscuss the standard(s) of c.docx
Application of Standards of CareDiscuss the standard(s) of c.docx
 
Application of the Nursing Process to Deliver Culturally Compe.docx
Application of the Nursing Process to Deliver Culturally Compe.docxApplication of the Nursing Process to Deliver Culturally Compe.docx
Application of the Nursing Process to Deliver Culturally Compe.docx
 
Application Ware House-Application DesignAppointyAppoi.docx
Application Ware House-Application DesignAppointyAppoi.docxApplication Ware House-Application DesignAppointyAppoi.docx
Application Ware House-Application DesignAppointyAppoi.docx
 
Applied Psycholinguistics 31 (2010), 413–438doi10.1017S014.docx
Applied Psycholinguistics 31 (2010), 413–438doi10.1017S014.docxApplied Psycholinguistics 31 (2010), 413–438doi10.1017S014.docx
Applied Psycholinguistics 31 (2010), 413–438doi10.1017S014.docx
 
Application of the Belmont PrinciplesFirst, identify your .docx
Application of the Belmont PrinciplesFirst, identify your .docxApplication of the Belmont PrinciplesFirst, identify your .docx
Application of the Belmont PrinciplesFirst, identify your .docx
 
APPLE is only one of the multiple companies that have approved and d.docx
APPLE is only one of the multiple companies that have approved and d.docxAPPLE is only one of the multiple companies that have approved and d.docx
APPLE is only one of the multiple companies that have approved and d.docx
 
Appliance Warehouse Service Plan.The discussion focuses on the.docx
Appliance Warehouse Service Plan.The discussion focuses on the.docxAppliance Warehouse Service Plan.The discussion focuses on the.docx
Appliance Warehouse Service Plan.The discussion focuses on the.docx
 
Applicants must submit a 500 essay describing how current or future .docx
Applicants must submit a 500 essay describing how current or future .docxApplicants must submit a 500 essay describing how current or future .docx
Applicants must submit a 500 essay describing how current or future .docx
 
Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Berkshire Hathaway, and Facebook ha.docx
Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Berkshire Hathaway, and Facebook ha.docxApple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Berkshire Hathaway, and Facebook ha.docx
Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Berkshire Hathaway, and Facebook ha.docx
 
Appcelerator Titanium was released in December 2008, and has been st.docx
Appcelerator Titanium was released in December 2008, and has been st.docxAppcelerator Titanium was released in December 2008, and has been st.docx
Appcelerator Titanium was released in December 2008, and has been st.docx
 
APA Style300 words per topic2 peer reviewed resources per to.docx
APA Style300 words per topic2 peer reviewed resources per to.docxAPA Style300 words per topic2 peer reviewed resources per to.docx
APA Style300 words per topic2 peer reviewed resources per to.docx
 
Ape and Human Cognition What’s theDifferenceMichael To.docx
Ape and Human Cognition What’s theDifferenceMichael To.docxApe and Human Cognition What’s theDifferenceMichael To.docx
Ape and Human Cognition What’s theDifferenceMichael To.docx
 
Apply what you have learned about Health Promotion and Disease P.docx
Apply what you have learned about Health Promotion and Disease P.docxApply what you have learned about Health Promotion and Disease P.docx
Apply what you have learned about Health Promotion and Disease P.docx
 
APA formatCite there peer-reviewed, scholarly references300 .docx
APA formatCite there peer-reviewed, scholarly references300 .docxAPA formatCite there peer-reviewed, scholarly references300 .docx
APA formatCite there peer-reviewed, scholarly references300 .docx
 
APA formatCite 2 peer-reviewed reference175-265 word count.docx
APA formatCite 2 peer-reviewed reference175-265 word count.docxAPA formatCite 2 peer-reviewed reference175-265 word count.docx
APA formatCite 2 peer-reviewed reference175-265 word count.docx
 
APA formatCite at least 1 referenceWrite a 175- to 265-w.docx
APA formatCite at least 1 referenceWrite a 175- to 265-w.docxAPA formatCite at least 1 referenceWrite a 175- to 265-w.docx
APA formatCite at least 1 referenceWrite a 175- to 265-w.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
Privatization and Disinvestment - Meaning, Objectives, Advantages and Disadva...
Privatization and Disinvestment - Meaning, Objectives, Advantages and Disadva...Privatization and Disinvestment - Meaning, Objectives, Advantages and Disadva...
Privatization and Disinvestment - Meaning, Objectives, Advantages and Disadva...RKavithamani
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxRoyAbrique
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppCeline George
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application ) Sakshi Ghasle
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
Privatization and Disinvestment - Meaning, Objectives, Advantages and Disadva...
Privatization and Disinvestment - Meaning, Objectives, Advantages and Disadva...Privatization and Disinvestment - Meaning, Objectives, Advantages and Disadva...
Privatization and Disinvestment - Meaning, Objectives, Advantages and Disadva...
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 

C A S EThe Case for Open Heart Surgery at Cabarrus.docx

  • 1. C A S E The Case for Open Heart Surgery at Cabarrus Memorial Hospital Situation It was a clear, crisp October morning in Concord, North Carolina. The board of trustees of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital gathered in the windowless, walnut paneled boardroom for its monthly meet- ing (see Exhibit 19/1 for board members). Board chairman George Batte opened the meeting saying, “Because we do not have an open heart surgery program, patients needing open heart surgery or coronary angioplasty have to be transferred to another hospi- tal, causing inconvenience to the patient’s families and risks from delayed treatment. There are several questions we have to answer in addressing this issue. Should we add open heart surgery to the mix of cardiac services we offer? Does the hospital’s existing service area provide adequate patient volumes to support the program? What
  • 2. This case was written by Fred H. Campbell, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, and Darise D. Caldwell, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Northeast Medical Center. It is intended as a basis for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. Used with permission from Fred Campbell. 19 both19.indd 803both19.indd 803 11/11/08 12:32:09 PM11/11/08 12:32:09 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 4 role should the Duke University Medical Center play in the proposed program? Will we be able to obtain the required certificate of need [CON] from the State of North Carolina’s Department of Health and Human Services? Will there be opposition to the CON from surrounding hospitals? What costs are likely to be incurred in the required renovation, construction, medical equipment, and staffing?” He continued, “As you all know, one of the factors pressing a quick decision is the desire of Dr. R. S. “Chris” Christy to return to the staff of the hospital after
  • 3. completing his fellowship in cardiovascular surgery. He is being heavily recruited by other medical centers.” Mr. Batte then asked Bob Wall, president of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital (CMH), to address the board on the issue. Mr. Wall said, “As we all know, our cardiac catheterization service is run by a Duke Medical Center physician. Our intent has been for the surgical portion of the heart program to be provided by Duke. Dr. Christy is completing a heart surgery residency through the Sanger Clinic and wants to return to Concord to practice. Needless to say, we face a dilemma and there are very different points of view in our medical staff as to the structure and relationship involved in developing a full-fledged heart program at CMH. I bring this to your attention now because Dr. Christy has to make a career choice before January 1st.” Trustee Batte reminded everyone, “Dr. Christy grew up in our community and worked part-time in the hospital while in high school and college. After medi- cal school and a residency in general surgery, he practiced here at CMH prior to leaving to complete his fellowship in cardiovascular surgery. Dr. Christy was very popular among the staff and patients and I, for one, very much want to see him return.” (See Exhibit 19/2 for Dr. Christy’s biography.)
  • 4. The board had to make its decision about the future of the cardiac program at CMH before offering Dr. Christy a position; however, it was clear that Dr. Christy could not wait too much longer to be offered a position by CMH. He had received multiple offers but, if he delayed, the offers might be withdrawn. History of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital The General Assembly of North Carolina passed legislation in 1935 that enabled Cabarrus County to establish a public hospital. Through the guidance of Mr. Charles A. Cannon, owner of Cannon Mills, the area’s largest employer, and Exhibit 19/1: CMH Board of Trustees Mr. George A. Batte, Jr., Chairman (Retired Manufacturing Executive) Mr. L. D. Coltrane, III, Vice Chairman (Telephone Company President) Mr. Robert L. Wall (President, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital) Mr. Dan Gray, Secretary (Executive Director, Charitable Foundation) Mr. Durwood Bost, CPA (Retired Manufacturing Executive) Mr. S. W. Colerider, Jr. (Retired Manufacturing Executive) Mr. Gene Verble (Merchant and Retired Major League Baseball Player) Mrs. Margaret C. West (Civic Leader) both19.indd 804both19.indd 804 11/11/08 12:32:10 PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM
  • 5. 8 0 5 other community leaders, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital was established and opened for patients on July 26, 1937. The original facility had 50 inpatient beds and a staff of 19 employees. The first addition of 100 beds was completed in 1940. A second addition opened in 1951 and brought the total bed capacity to 339. A construction and renovation program, started in 1969, expanded the total licensed capacity to 350 acute care beds and 30 bassinets. The adult bed capacity was increased to 457 beds through a 1982 construction project that modernized and consolidated many of the hospital’s services. Duke Medical Center – CMH Affiliation CMH had several educational affiliation programs and extensive in-service and continuing education programs, including a unique teaching arrangement with Duke University Medical Center. The formal affiliation with Duke included regular sessions on general and specialty medical topics and patient- directed teaching conferences used as an additional education tool (see Exhibit 19/3). This Duke affiliation had begun to seed many specialists at CMH, including a cardiologist, whose practice was rapidly growing.
  • 6. CMH was a modern, well-equipped facility. Mr. Cannon, as owner of the large Cannon Mills, had wanted the thousands of Cannon Mills’ employees to have the very best health care. His generosity and interest in the hospital had made the Duke affiliation possible. It has been said that he carried the hospital on the mill’s books as “plant 13.” Certainly his philanthropy had in fact made it a much more advanced medical center than those in other communities the size of Cabarrus County. The Cardiac Program at CMH For several years, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital had increased the availability of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular services to the community. CMH had as members of the active medical staff one invasive cardiologist and three Exhibit 19/2: Dr. R. S. “Chris” Christy Ralph S. “Chris” Christy was born July 26, 1957 at Cabarrus Memorial Hospital. He was one of two children born to Steve and Rachel Christy, hardworking owners of Christy’s Nursery in Concord. Chris was educated in the Cabarrus County School system and played football for NorthWest Cabarrus High School. He married Kay Moore, also from Concord, in 1977 and together they embarked on the adventure of Chris becoming a physician. Chris graduated from Davidson College with a BS and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a medical
  • 7. degree. He then attended a surgical residency program at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah. After his residency, Chris returned to Concord and joined the surgical practice of Flowe, Crooke and Chalfant. Two years later, Chris entered the Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Fellowship program at Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, North Carolina. Under the tutelage of Dr. Frances Robicsek, a well-known and respected pioneer in open-heart surgery, Dr. Christy developed the expert cardiac surgery skills that he wanted to bring to Cabarrus Memorial Hospital. T H E C A R D I A C P R O G R A M AT C M H both19.indd 805both19.indd 805 11/11/08 12:32:10 PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 6 Exhibit 19/3: Cabarrus Memorial Hospital – Duke University Medical Center Education Affiliation As early as 1966, the United States government launched a series of planning grants for regional medical programs for heart, cancer, and stroke patients. Under this federal proposal Cabarrus Memorial Hospital was to be affiliated with Duke University Medical Center. The Duke – CMH program began in 1968 with Duke faculty members leading training sessions for CMH’s doctors and nurses at Salisbury’s
  • 8. Rowan Technical Institute. Dr. George Engstrom recalled, “CMH medical staff wanted a more direct educational affiliation with Duke. Dr. Ladd Hamrick, CMH internist, talked with Dr. Eugene Stead at Duke and a stronger affiliation was proposed. After the discussions with Duke, CMH president Wall, Dr. Bob Hammonds, and Dr. Hamrick took the proposal for the expanded educational affiliation proposals to George Batte, chairman of CMH board’s executive committee.” Dr. Engstrom continued, “They presented the program in 15 minutes and Mr. Batte’s response was, ‘Do you think it will work?’ The answer was ‘yes’ and his response was, ‘I think we can get the money . . .’ The critical funding for the program came from The Cannon Foundation through the leadership of Mr. Batte.” As Dr. Hamrick said, “The affiliation forged in 1972 became ‘a powerhouse.’” The successful Duke –Cabarrus liaison was to become a model program for other health centers, for it brought not only Duke medical specialists to CMH, but also spurred seminars, classes, and studies with other nationally recognized physicians and researchers. The basic agreement was that fellows “from five of Duke’s divisions of internal medicine began to travel for two 48-hour periods per month to function as educational consultants to the general internists.” Actually, Duke faculty members from other departments began to travel to Cabarrus. The affiliation required that patient contact with Duke physicians be educational for Cabarrus doctors. The Cabarrus activities were to include consultations on educational matters,
  • 9. presenting conferences, reviewing clinical studies, assisting in surgery, and teaching new or different procedures and techniques, among others. In 1973, Dr. Galen Wagner of Duke’s Cardiology faculty, was appointed Department of Medicine coordinator. In 1974, Dr. Tom Long of Duke’s gastroenterology faculty was named Cabarrus-based coordinator for the Department of Medicine. He ultimately moved to Cabarrus County where he con- tinued his medical practice and affiliation work. Under the affiliation, visiting medical professors from such highly regarded universities as Harvard, Stanford, Vanderbilt, University of Pittsburgh, and even medical leaders from foreign countries, came to teach and consult at Cabarrus Memorial Hospital. According to Dr. Long, “By 1992 there had been 14,703 Duke visits to Cabarrus; 55,826 clinical consultations; 7,636 physicians conferences; and 77,792 continuing medical education hours credited to CMH physicians.” He further noted the many benefits to CMH: “Cabarrus doctors received con- tinuing education through Duke conferences; quality physicians were attracted to the community; conferences between Duke and Cabarrus doctors about patients were free; medical expertise and new skills were provided; doctor interest in sophisticated patient care was maintained; and new ‘cutting edge’ technology was developed.” internists that specialized in treatment of heart diseases. A second invasive cardiologist and another noninvasive cardiologist were expected
  • 10. to join the staff in the next year. Dr. Christy would potentially become the first cardiovascular surgeon on the staff if the board elected to proceed and was successful in receiv- ing the CON. The scope of the CMH cardiology services included an emergency room staffed and equipped for treatment of cardiac emergencies, an eight-bed coronary care unit, cardiac catheterization, and cardiac rehabilitation. (See Exhibit 19/4 for a both19.indd 806both19.indd 806 11/11/08 12:32:10 PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM 8 0 7 glossary of related medical terms.) In addition, the hospital had capabilities for numerous cardiovascular diagnostic and therapeutic services. Electro- diagnostic services included electrocardiograms, cardiac Doppler studies, echo EKGs, exercise EKG studies, and Holter monitoring. The magnetic resonance imag- ing (MRI) unit had cardiac imaging capabilities. The nuclear medicine department had equipment for nuclear cardiac and thallium scanning. Temporary and perma- nent pacemaker insertions, thrombolytic therapy through streptokinase and TPA infusions, and Swan Ganz catheter insertions were examples of
  • 11. the hospital’s treatment capabilities. The new program being considered would include one open heart surgical suite for adult procedures, with the capacity for 400 procedures per year. Angioplasty would be offered in the existing cardiac catheterization laboratory. It was projected that by the end of the third year, three dedicated cardiac surgical ICU beds and seven telemetry beds would be required to support the open heart Exhibit 19/4: Glossary Angioplasty – The insertion of a catheter into the coronary arteries including inflation of a balloon to squeeze coronary artery plaque formation to decrease blockages Cardiac Doppler Studies – An imaging study of the heart using ultrasound that involved measure- ment of pressures in different chambers of the heart, also used to evaluate the valves of the heart Cardiologist – A physician who attained fellowship training in diseases of the heart and cardio- vascular system Certificate of Need (CON) – Authorization by the State of North Carolina, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Facility Services to proceed with expenditures for new health facility/equipment
  • 12. Echocardiography – Diagnostic heart study using ultrasound technology to demonstrate the physical functioning of the heart Electrocardiogram (EKG) – A trace of the electrical currents that initiated the heartbeat; used to diagnose possible heart disorders Epidemiology – The study of the health and diseases of populations Exercise EKG – An electrocardiogram performed when the patient was exercising, usually on a treadmill Holter Monitor – A diagnostic tool that utilized an extended wearing of an electrocardiogram mon- itor with which the patient transmitted events telephonically Intensive Care Unit (ICU) – A specialized patient care unit within a hospital utilized by patients who required constant, high level of care Invasive Cardiologist – A cardiologist who performed invasive procedures such as angioplasty Noninvasive Cardiologist – A cardiologist who specialized in medical treatment of heart disease rather than performing invasive procedures Nuclear Medicine – A field of diagnostic imaging that utilized nucleotide particles injected into the patient, then evaluated with a nuclear camera to produce an image Swan Ganz Catheter – A pressure catheter that was inserted into the right side of the heart to
  • 13. measure the performance of the heart Telemetry – The monitoring of the conduction patterns of the heart through radio wave transmission from a remote area to a central location Thrombolytic Therapy – The use of “clot dissolving” drugs to open blocked arteries T H E C A R D I A C P R O G R A M AT C M H both19.indd 807both19.indd 807 11/11/08 12:32:11 PM11/11/08 12:32:11 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 8 surgery program. Existing space would need to be renovated to accommodate the various service components. The additional cardiac service being considered would provide patients of CMH with a full-service cardiology program consistent with programs available at other community hospitals and with service areas comparable in size to the CMH service area. The programs and large expenditures would assure continuity of care for patients who received initial cardiac care at CMH. If the board decided not to commit to expanding the cardiac program, CMH patients needing open
  • 14. heart surgery or coronary angioplasty would continue to be transferred to another hospital in the region, such as Duke. Decision Factors A major part of the board of trustees’ consideration was whether or not there existed a large enough service area to sufficiently support open heart surgery and the expansion of the existing cardiac services. They wanted to know what population threshold would be required. Did they have enough population in the hospital’s existing service area? The trustees, in making their expansion decision, looked at a number of factors. They included: (1) the primary and secondary service areas based on historical data; (2) population growth; (3) population epidemiology; (4) availability of existing open heart surgery medical centers; (5) accessibility to cardiac surgery programs; (6) continuity of cardiology care; and (7) rate of demand for open heart surgery. The hospital’s planning staff, directed by vice president Glenn Reed, provided data on each of the areas. 1. Primary and Secondary Service Areas To determine the service area for the proposed heart program expansion, the existing service area for the hospital was identified by examining the hospital’s patient database and noting the patients’ residential addresses, particularly zip
  • 15. codes. Second, they mapped this service area and evaluated the road and trans- portation network, travel times, and other hospitals in the region. (See Exhibits 19/5 and 19/6.) In board discussions, president Wall advised the trustees that hospital plan- ners had looked at patient origins for an existing tertiary program – radiation oncology. This study showed that its major source of patients had been Concord and Kannapolis, with the remainder widely spread over 23 other communities. Mr. Wall asked, “Does this give us reason to believe we can expect referrals to CMH for open heart surgery to come from a wider service area than the hos- pital average?” (See Exhibits 19/7 and 19/8.) To further look at the question of patient origins, CMH studied zip code origins for its cardiac catheterization patients. Again, a large number of patients had Concord and Kannapolis zip codes and generally reflected patient origins both19.indd 808both19.indd 808 11/11/08 12:32:11 PM11/11/08 12:32:11 PM Exhibit 19/5 Cabarrus Memorial Hospital Patient Origin County % Patient Origin
  • 16. Cabarrus 80.1 Rowan 9.4 Stanly 7.2 Other 3.3 TOTAL 100.0 Note: “Other” includes Union, Mecklenburg, Davie, Davidson, Iredell, and Lincoln counties. Source: Hospital Patient Origin Report (North Carolina Medical Database Commission). R O W A N C A B A R R U S S T A N L Y M E C K L E N B U R G U N I O N Charlotte Salisbury Concord Monroe Albemarle Kannapolis Mooresville
  • 18. 601 77 601 85 85 I R E D E L L Exhibit 19/6: Map of CMH Service Area Key: 1. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital 2. Rowan Memorial Hospital 3. Stanly Memorial Hospital 4. Union Memorial Hospital 5. University Memorial Hospital 6. Mercy Hospital 7. Presbyterian Hospital 8. Carolinas Medical Center 9. Lowrance Hospital both19.indd 809both19.indd 809 11/11/08 12:32:12 PM11/11/08 12:32:12 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 0 similar to those of the radiation oncology program. Again the board wondered if this indicated the open heart program would draw patients from
  • 19. a service area that would include parts or all of six counties: Cabarrus, Rowan, Stanly, Union, Iredell, and Mecklenburg. The outside boundaries of these counties are within 60 miles of Concord, the site of CMH. Mr. Wall questioned, “What would further analysis of the historical data lead planners to conclude about the program’s primary service area? Could it serve as much as 70 percent of Cabarrus and a third of Rowan County? Would the second- ary service area include parts of Stanly, Union, Mecklenburg, and Iredell Counties? What percentage of the population in those counties lived within 40 miles of CMH? Would this comprise a secondary service area large enough?” A major demographic factor driving the perceived demand for open heart surgery at CMH was population growth. According to the Government and Business Services Branch of the State Library of North Carolina, total population for these six counties was expected to increase 18.3 percent over the next ten years. Therefore, even if open heart surgery usage rates remained constant each year, counties in this service area could have expected at least 18 percent more open heart surgery cases over the ten year period. (See Exhibit 19/9.) 2. Growth of At-Risk Population A second major demographic factor driving the demand for open
  • 20. heart sur- gery was growth of the at-risk population. According to projections from the recent census, the number of people aged 45 to 64, the population most likely to Exhibit 19/8: Proposed CMH Open Heart Service Population County Population Market Cabarrus 69,255 70.0 Rowan 40,813 36.9 Stanly 7,661 14.8 Union 1,516 1.8 Mecklenburg 1,534 0.3 Iredell 651 0.7 Exhibit 19/7: CMH Patient Origin (%) Previous Year County Radiation Oncology Heart Catheterization Cabarrus 57.4 59.3 Rowan 16.0 30.4 Stanly 19.7 7.3 Other 6.9 3.0 TOTAL 100.0 100.0 both19.indd 810both19.indd 810 11/11/08 12:32:13 PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM
  • 21. 8 1 1 suffer occlusive coronary artery disease, was predicted to grow by 38.3 percent in the next ten years, a rate more than twice that of the general population. (See Exhibit 19/10.) 3. Population Epidemiology Based on the latest available data, all the proposed service area counties, with the exception of Union and Mecklenburg, had evidence of a heart disease mortality rate higher than that of the state as a whole (see Exhibit 19/11). According to the data that had been recently reported by the North Carolina Database Commission, open heart surgery usage rates in Cabarrus County were higher than that of the entire state. The previous year North Carolina had experienced a procedure rate of 1.39 per 1,000 population. 4. Availability of Existing Services for Patients in CMH Service Area North Carolina had 16 open heart surgery programs located in 11 counties. None of these programs was in the proposed CMH primary service area. Those closest to the CMH service area were located in Charlotte. They were Mercy Exhibit 19/9: Ten-Year Projection: Service Area Population Growth
  • 22. County Year 1 Year 2 Change (%) Cabarrus 98,935 112,802 14.0 Rowan 110,605 122,268 10.5 Stanly 51,765 55,185 6.6 Union 84,211 99,644 18.3 Mecklenburg 511,433 630,005 23.2 Iredell 92,931 103,820 11.7 TOTAL 949,880 1,123,724 18.3 Exhibit 19/10: Growth of At-Risk Population: Aged 45 to 64 Previous Year 10 years Change (%) Cabarrus 20,419 26,797 31.2 Rowan 22,729 28,348 24.7 Stanly 10,691 12,761 19.4 Union 16,458 23,290 41.5 Mecklenburg 91,747 135,154 47.3 Iredell 19,950 25,504 27.8 TOTAL 181,994 251,854 38.4 D E C I S I O N F A C T O R S both19.indd 811both19.indd 811 11/11/08 12:32:13 PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 2
  • 23. Hospital, Presbyterian Hospital, and Carolinas Medical Center, all located about 25 miles from CMH. Only one of the state’s 16 programs had claimed Cabarrus County in its primary service area. That claim had been made eight years earlier by Carolinas Medical Center when it opened its service. Since that time, Carolinas Medical Center had drawn only 5.6 percent of its patients from Cabarrus County, suggesting to the CMH board that Cabarrus patient volumes at Carolinas Medical Center did not warrant being included in Carolinas Medical Center’s primary service area. The three Charlotte programs had reported previous year operating room uti- lization for cardiac surgery as follows: Mercy Hospital, 36.3 percent; Presbyterian Hospital, 78.5 percent; and Carolinas Medical Center, 84.5 percent. Procedure volume had increased yearly at both Presbyterian and Carolinas Medical Center. Presbyterian, with its two open heart surgery suites operating at 78.5 percent of nominal capacity, apparently needed its operating rooms. Carolinas Medical Center, with its six rooms classified as combined “open heart surgery/thoracic suites,” had submitted a CON application for an additional open heart surgery room. However, earlier in the year, it had subsequently withdrawn
  • 24. its application for a CON. For the Department of Facilities Services to award a CON, the existing utilization rate for the cardiac surgery suite was required to be at 80 percent or higher. Procedure volume at Mercy Hospital had not followed a year-to- year growth pattern. Room utilization had been well under 50 percent each year for the pre- vious ten years. Moreover, Mercy did not appear to reach the proposed CMH open heart service area. In the previous year only 9 percent of the 174 people from Cabarrus County, and none from Rowan County, had received open heart surgery at Mercy. The pattern indicated a perceived or real barrier to access at Mercy by people in the CMH area counties. Generally, Mercy appeared to serve a population that was more south and east of Charlotte. 5. Accessibility to Cardiac Surgery Programs The existing open heart surgery programs in Charlotte, Winston-Salem, and Greensboro were 25 to 60 miles from the service population. Although this seemed Exhibit 19/11: Heart Disease Mortality Rates: Two Years Previous County Death Rate/1,000 Population Rowan 375.8 Cabarrus 320.7
  • 25. Stanly 326.0 Union 246.5 Mecklenburg 225.0 Iredell 325.2 North Carolina 288.6 both19.indd 812both19.indd 812 11/11/08 12:32:13 PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM 8 1 3 relatively close for a one-time procedure, it was inconvenient for persons traveling repeatedly for diagnosis, family support, and follow-up care. “Driving to Charlotte is becoming more and more of a problem,” commented a board member. “I am often asked why we can’t provide more care in Cabarrus County.” Heart patients from the CMH area had to travel to existing services along com- binations of country roads and heavily congested traffic arteries. Travel time was from one to two hours. Congestion and delay were expected to further increase the time as the Charlotte metropolitan area continued to grow 3 percent per year, a rate triple that of the state. Moreover, to many residents of the CMH service area, Charlotte
  • 26. was a big city and confusing for drivers from out of town. Its perceived distance was farther than its actual distance because of the delays in city travel. This had been noted with the opening of radiation oncology at CMH. Patient volumes were much higher than expected. Surveys of patients and families cited dis- tance, lack of transportation, and fear of the city as reasons for not having obtained radiation treatments at distant sites that had been recommended by their physicians. As part of the affiliation between Duke University Medical Center and Cabarrus Memorial hospital, two Duke open heart surgeons, Jim Lowe, MD, and Peter Smith, MD, participated in monthly conferences at CMH and con- sulted on patient candidates for open heart surgery. Those patient consulta- tions became referrals to Duke when surgery was indicated. The medical staff suggested that the patient trip of 120 miles to Duke would be eliminated if open heart surgery of equal quality could be performed at CMH, as was being proposed. However, it was expected that a few cases needing specialized care would still be referred to Duke (or other medical centers) after the CMH pro- gram was opened. Approximately 40 percent of CMH cardiac catheterization referrals were going to Duke.
  • 27. 6. Continuity of Cardiology Care Continuity of care for the cardiology patient was critical. Quality was enhanced when patient transfers were minimized, medical and nursing staff were con- stant, and staff and technology for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were maintained. To obtain the desired level of care, CMH patients were being trans- ferred to other facilities when cardiac surgery was indicated. This transfer dis- rupted continuity. According to the North Carolina Database Commission, for the previous year, 174 Cabarrus County and 118 Rowan County residents received open heart surgery in one of the following hospitals: Duke University Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, Carolinas Medical Center, NC Baptist Hospitals, and a few others. For many of those 292 patients, a CMH-based open heart surgery service would have avoided transfers and ensured continuity of cardiology care. (See Exhibit 19/12.) D E C I S I O N F A C T O R S both19.indd 813both19.indd 813 11/11/08 12:32:14 PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM
  • 28. C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 4 The scope and comprehensiveness of cardiology services at CMH had expanded yearly. Two years previously, CMH had initiated its cardiac catheterization pro- gram. In the past year, the CMH program referred 117 patients to open heart surgery and 82 to angioplasty. In addition, Rowan Memorial Hospital, located in Salisbury (a half-hour’s drive to the north), had opened a cardiac catheterization service and could have been considered another referral source for the proposed CMH program. The next logical step in the continuity of cardiac care was argued to be the open heart surgery program. Availability of open heart surgery and angioplasty would have provided invasive options for treatment of coronary artery disease and reduced outside referrals to a small percentage of patients. A physi- cian board member commented, “It is time this becomes a full- service hospital. Cabarrus County deserves it and cardiac surgery will be just the beginning.” 7. Growth in Demand Over the previous ten years, North Carolina open heart surgery volume had increased an average of 26 percent a year. Moreover, statistical forecasts had predicted continued increases in use rate per 1,000 population for the next five
  • 29. years. The rate of 0.43 open heart surgeries per 1,000 population ten years ago had increased to 1.39 per 1,000. Cardiac catheterization was the major diagnostic procedure that resulted in a recommendation for open heart surgery. Changes in cardiac catheterization volumes were, therefore, important to predict open heart demand at a particular location. North Carolina cardiac catheterization volume had grown at an average annual rate of 16.2 percent over the prior nine years. Although the rate of growth was slowing, anecdotal projections and trended fore- casts predicted continued growth for the next five years. The state’s cardiac catheterization to open heart procedure ratio had also increased annually. Over the past year, the ratio had increased to 4.54 adult catheterizations for each open heart procedure. Similar to the annual growth rate for open heart surgery procedures, this ratio was also growing. Exhibit 19/12: Where Cabarrus-Rowan Residents Received Open Heart Surgery: Previous Year Destination Hospital Cabarrus Residents Rowan Residents Total Duke University Medical Center 28 16 44 Presbyterian Hospital 68 25 93 Mercy Hospital 9 0 9 Carolinas Medical Center 66 44 110 NC Baptist Hospitals 0 28 28 Unknown 3 5 8
  • 30. TOTAL 174 118 292 both19.indd 814both19.indd 814 11/11/08 12:32:14 PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM 8 1 5 Financial Considerations In addition to market demand and trend analysis, the board was faced with the financial aspect of the decision. President Wall asked the CFO to present the financial data. An open heart surgery program would incur a number of expenses. In addi- tion to Dr. Christy and his surgical team, there would be a need for 23 additional employees in year 1, growing to 39 in year 3 (see Exhibit 19/13). It was projected there would be a need for ten beds licensed as acute care beds, not then being utilized, to become operational as coronary care beds. Addition- ally there would be a need for three intensive care unit (ICU) beds, and the one new open heart operating suite. A total of 5,811 sq. ft. of hospital space would require renovation. Projected capital costs, including construction and equipment, were $3,273,180. The hos-
  • 31. pital had sufficient reserve funds to underwrite the renovation project and the additional equipment without borrowing money. Exhibit 19/13: CMH Open Heart Staffing Plan Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 53 Procedures 106 Procedures 211 Procedures Operating Room Nurse Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 RN 2.50 3.50 6.00 OR Tech 2.00 2.00 3.00 OR Aide/Transport 0.50 0.50 1.00 CRNA 1.00 1.50 3.00 Anesthesia Tech 0.50 0.50 1.00 Respiratory Therapist 1.00 1.50 3.00 Subtotal 8.50 10.50 18.00 Surgery/Recovery Nurse Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50 RN 4.00 4.00 7.00 Ward Secretary 0.50 0.50 0.50 Subtotal 5.00 5.00 8.00 Telemetry Unit Nurse Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50 RN 3.00 4.00 7.00 Monitor Tech 3.00 3.00 3.00 Ward Secretary 0.50 0.50 0.50 Subtotal 7.00 8.00 11.00
  • 32. Nurse Educator 0.50 0.50 0.50 Angioplasty RN 1.00 1.00 1.00 Angioplasty Tech 1.00 1.00 1.00 Subtotal 2.50 2.50 2.50 TOTAL 23.00 26.00 39.50 F I N A N C I A L C O N S I D E R AT I O N S both19.indd 815both19.indd 815 11/11/08 12:32:14 PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 6 Direct costs for the open heart program were projected to be $2,364,214 in year 1, $3,217,739 in year 2, and $5,438,392 in year 3 (see Exhibit 19/14). Average length of stay per open heart patient was projected to be nine days. Projected average open heart surgery fees per case were $13,000 without catheterization and $15,000 with catheterization. These estimates represented full, nonprofessional fees and the surgeon’s fee, as well as other professional components such as anesthesia, pathology, and radiology. Average room and board charges were estimated at $826 per day. All ancillaries were projected at $3,725 per day. Total average projected charge for each open
  • 33. heart surgery procedure was $40,957. The Meeting Draws to a Close President Wall and various members of the hospital staff had presented the findings to the trustees. The data and information had been collected, tabulated, and analyzed. It was time to make a decision. Should CMH go ahead with an application for a certificate of need for an open heart surgery program? As they sat there waiting for someone to speak, Mrs. West asked, “Mr. Batte, what do you think we should do? Do we go for the CON?” Exhibit 19/14: Open Heart Program Costs Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Direct Costs Clinical Personnel $711,793 $910,878 $1,695,457 Administrative Personnel 136,565 147,490 159,289 Support Personnel 52,764 56,985 61,544 Personnel Taxes/Benefits 180,224 223,071 383,258 Medical Supplies 315,947 746,439 1,749,771 Other Supplies 15,950 68,980 75,445 Depreciation, Equipment 243,376 243,376 243,376 Plant Operations and Maintenance 48,087 52,415 57,132 Other Associated Expenses (Angioplasty) 449,965 534,033 615,723 Other Associated Expenses 99,543 99,212 99,212 Contracted Services 110,000 134,860 298,185 Total Direct Costs 2,364,214 3,217,739 5,438,392 Indirect Costs
  • 34. General and Administrative 255,966 302,376 416,862 Other Overhead 73,200 88,630 175,473 Depreciation, Building 43,525 43,525 43,525 Other Property, Ownership and Use Expense 2,036 2,402 2,835 Consultant Services 122,740 153,399 154,699 Rowan Community Outreach 6,183 6,739 7,346 Total Indirect Costs 503,650 597,071 800,740 Total Costs $2,867,864 $3,814,810 $6,239,132 both19.indd 816both19.indd 816 11/11/08 12:32:15 PM11/11/08 12:32:15 PM C A S E The Case for Open Heart Surgery at Cabarrus Memorial Hospital Situation It was a clear, crisp October morning in Concord, North Carolina. The board of trustees of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital gathered in the windowless, walnut paneled boardroom for its monthly meet-
  • 35. ing (see Exhibit 19/1 for board members). Board chairman George Batte opened the meeting saying, “Because we do not have an open heart surgery program, patients needing open heart surgery or coronary angioplasty have to be transferred to another hospi- tal, causing inconvenience to the patient’s families and risks from delayed treatment. There are several questions we have to answer in addressing this issue. Should we add open heart surgery to the mix of cardiac services we offer? Does the hospital’s existing service area provide adequate patient volumes to support the program? What This case was written by Fred H. Campbell, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, and Darise D. Caldwell, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Northeast Medical Center. It is intended as a basis for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. Used with permission from Fred Campbell. 19 both19.indd 803both19.indd 803 11/11/08 12:32:09 PM11/11/08 12:32:09 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 4 role should the Duke University Medical Center play in the
  • 36. proposed program? Will we be able to obtain the required certificate of need [CON] from the State of North Carolina’s Department of Health and Human Services? Will there be opposition to the CON from surrounding hospitals? What costs are likely to be incurred in the required renovation, construction, medical equipment, and staffing?” He continued, “As you all know, one of the factors pressing a quick decision is the desire of Dr. R. S. “Chris” Christy to return to the staff of the hospital after completing his fellowship in cardiovascular surgery. He is being heavily recruited by other medical centers.” Mr. Batte then asked Bob Wall, president of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital (CMH), to address the board on the issue. Mr. Wall said, “As we all know, our cardiac catheterization service is run by a Duke Medical Center physician. Our intent has been for the surgical portion of the heart program to be provided by Duke. Dr. Christy is completing a heart surgery residency through the Sanger Clinic and wants to return to Concord to practice. Needless to say, we face a dilemma and there are very different points of view in our medical staff as to the structure and relationship involved in developing a full-fledged heart program at CMH. I bring this to your attention now because Dr. Christy has to make a
  • 37. career choice before January 1st.” Trustee Batte reminded everyone, “Dr. Christy grew up in our community and worked part-time in the hospital while in high school and college. After medi- cal school and a residency in general surgery, he practiced here at CMH prior to leaving to complete his fellowship in cardiovascular surgery. Dr. Christy was very popular among the staff and patients and I, for one, very much want to see him return.” (See Exhibit 19/2 for Dr. Christy’s biography.) The board had to make its decision about the future of the cardiac program at CMH before offering Dr. Christy a position; however, it was clear that Dr. Christy could not wait too much longer to be offered a position by CMH. He had received multiple offers but, if he delayed, the offers might be withdrawn. History of Cabarrus Memorial Hospital The General Assembly of North Carolina passed legislation in 1935 that enabled Cabarrus County to establish a public hospital. Through the guidance of Mr. Charles A. Cannon, owner of Cannon Mills, the area’s largest employer, and Exhibit 19/1: CMH Board of Trustees Mr. George A. Batte, Jr., Chairman (Retired Manufacturing Executive)
  • 38. Mr. L. D. Coltrane, III, Vice Chairman (Telephone Company President) Mr. Robert L. Wall (President, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital) Mr. Dan Gray, Secretary (Executive Director, Charitable Foundation) Mr. Durwood Bost, CPA (Retired Manufacturing Executive) Mr. S. W. Colerider, Jr. (Retired Manufacturing Executive) Mr. Gene Verble (Merchant and Retired Major League Baseball Player) Mrs. Margaret C. West (Civic Leader) both19.indd 804both19.indd 804 11/11/08 12:32:10 PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM 8 0 5 other community leaders, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital was established and opened for patients on July 26, 1937. The original facility had 50 inpatient beds and a staff of 19 employees. The first addition of 100 beds was completed in 1940. A second addition opened in 1951 and brought the total bed capacity to 339. A construction and renovation program, started in 1969, expanded the total licensed capacity to 350 acute care beds and 30 bassinets. The adult bed capacity was increased to 457 beds through a 1982 construction project that modernized and consolidated many of the hospital’s services. Duke Medical Center – CMH Affiliation
  • 39. CMH had several educational affiliation programs and extensive in-service and continuing education programs, including a unique teaching arrangement with Duke University Medical Center. The formal affiliation with Duke included regular sessions on general and specialty medical topics and patient- directed teaching conferences used as an additional education tool (see Exhibit 19/3). This Duke affiliation had begun to seed many specialists at CMH, including a cardiologist, whose practice was rapidly growing. CMH was a modern, well-equipped facility. Mr. Cannon, as owner of the large Cannon Mills, had wanted the thousands of Cannon Mills’ employees to have the very best health care. His generosity and interest in the hospital had made the Duke affiliation possible. It has been said that he carried the hospital on the mill’s books as “plant 13.” Certainly his philanthropy had in fact made it a much more advanced medical center than those in other communities the size of Cabarrus County. The Cardiac Program at CMH For several years, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital had increased the availability of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular services to the community. CMH had as members of the active medical staff one invasive cardiologist and three
  • 40. Exhibit 19/2: Dr. R. S. “Chris” Christy Ralph S. “Chris” Christy was born July 26, 1957 at Cabarrus Memorial Hospital. He was one of two children born to Steve and Rachel Christy, hardworking owners of Christy’s Nursery in Concord. Chris was educated in the Cabarrus County School system and played football for NorthWest Cabarrus High School. He married Kay Moore, also from Concord, in 1977 and together they embarked on the adventure of Chris becoming a physician. Chris graduated from Davidson College with a BS and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a medical degree. He then attended a surgical residency program at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah. After his residency, Chris returned to Concord and joined the surgical practice of Flowe, Crooke and Chalfant. Two years later, Chris entered the Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Fellowship program at Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, North Carolina. Under the tutelage of Dr. Frances Robicsek, a well-known and respected pioneer in open-heart surgery, Dr. Christy developed the expert cardiac surgery skills that he wanted to bring to Cabarrus Memorial Hospital. T H E C A R D I A C P R O G R A M AT C M H both19.indd 805both19.indd 805 11/11/08 12:32:10 PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S
  • 41. U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 6 Exhibit 19/3: Cabarrus Memorial Hospital – Duke University Medical Center Education Affiliation As early as 1966, the United States government launched a series of planning grants for regional medical programs for heart, cancer, and stroke patients. Under this federal proposal Cabarrus Memorial Hospital was to be affiliated with Duke University Medical Center. The Duke – CMH program began in 1968 with Duke faculty members leading training sessions for CMH’s doctors and nurses at Salisbury’s Rowan Technical Institute. Dr. George Engstrom recalled, “CMH medical staff wanted a more direct educational affiliation with Duke. Dr. Ladd Hamrick, CMH internist, talked with Dr. Eugene Stead at Duke and a stronger affiliation was proposed. After the discussions with Duke, CMH president Wall, Dr. Bob Hammonds, and Dr. Hamrick took the proposal for the expanded educational affiliation proposals to George Batte, chairman of CMH board’s executive committee.” Dr. Engstrom continued, “They presented the program in 15 minutes and Mr. Batte’s response was, ‘Do you think it will work?’ The answer was ‘yes’ and his response was, ‘I think we can get the money . . .’ The critical funding for the program came from The Cannon Foundation through the leadership of Mr. Batte.” As Dr. Hamrick said, “The affiliation forged in 1972 became ‘a powerhouse.’” The successful Duke –Cabarrus liaison was to become a model program for
  • 42. other health centers, for it brought not only Duke medical specialists to CMH, but also spurred seminars, classes, and studies with other nationally recognized physicians and researchers. The basic agreement was that fellows “from five of Duke’s divisions of internal medicine began to travel for two 48-hour periods per month to function as educational consultants to the general internists.” Actually, Duke faculty members from other departments began to travel to Cabarrus. The affiliation required that patient contact with Duke physicians be educational for Cabarrus doctors. The Cabarrus activities were to include consultations on educational matters, presenting conferences, reviewing clinical studies, assisting in surgery, and teaching new or different procedures and techniques, among others. In 1973, Dr. Galen Wagner of Duke’s Cardiology faculty, was appointed Department of Medicine coordinator. In 1974, Dr. Tom Long of Duke’s gastroenterology faculty was named Cabarrus-based coordinator for the Department of Medicine. He ultimately moved to Cabarrus County where he con- tinued his medical practice and affiliation work. Under the affiliation, visiting medical professors from such highly regarded universities as Harvard, Stanford, Vanderbilt, University of Pittsburgh, and even medical leaders from foreign countries, came to teach and consult at Cabarrus Memorial Hospital. According to Dr. Long, “By 1992 there had been 14,703 Duke visits to Cabarrus; 55,826 clinical consultations; 7,636 physicians conferences; and 77,792 continuing medical education hours credited
  • 43. to CMH physicians.” He further noted the many benefits to CMH: “Cabarrus doctors received con- tinuing education through Duke conferences; quality physicians were attracted to the community; conferences between Duke and Cabarrus doctors about patients were free; medical expertise and new skills were provided; doctor interest in sophisticated patient care was maintained; and new ‘cutting edge’ technology was developed.” internists that specialized in treatment of heart diseases. A second invasive cardiologist and another noninvasive cardiologist were expected to join the staff in the next year. Dr. Christy would potentially become the first cardiovascular surgeon on the staff if the board elected to proceed and was successful in receiv- ing the CON. The scope of the CMH cardiology services included an emergency room staffed and equipped for treatment of cardiac emergencies, an eight-bed coronary care unit, cardiac catheterization, and cardiac rehabilitation. (See Exhibit 19/4 for a both19.indd 806both19.indd 806 11/11/08 12:32:10 PM11/11/08 12:32:10 PM 8 0 7 glossary of related medical terms.) In addition, the hospital had
  • 44. capabilities for numerous cardiovascular diagnostic and therapeutic services. Electro- diagnostic services included electrocardiograms, cardiac Doppler studies, echo EKGs, exercise EKG studies, and Holter monitoring. The magnetic resonance imag- ing (MRI) unit had cardiac imaging capabilities. The nuclear medicine department had equipment for nuclear cardiac and thallium scanning. Temporary and perma- nent pacemaker insertions, thrombolytic therapy through streptokinase and TPA infusions, and Swan Ganz catheter insertions were examples of the hospital’s treatment capabilities. The new program being considered would include one open heart surgical suite for adult procedures, with the capacity for 400 procedures per year. Angioplasty would be offered in the existing cardiac catheterization laboratory. It was projected that by the end of the third year, three dedicated cardiac surgical ICU beds and seven telemetry beds would be required to support the open heart Exhibit 19/4: Glossary Angioplasty – The insertion of a catheter into the coronary arteries including inflation of a balloon to squeeze coronary artery plaque formation to decrease blockages Cardiac Doppler Studies – An imaging study of the heart using
  • 45. ultrasound that involved measure- ment of pressures in different chambers of the heart, also used to evaluate the valves of the heart Cardiologist – A physician who attained fellowship training in diseases of the heart and cardio- vascular system Certificate of Need (CON) – Authorization by the State of North Carolina, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Facility Services to proceed with expenditures for new health facility/equipment Echocardiography – Diagnostic heart study using ultrasound technology to demonstrate the physical functioning of the heart Electrocardiogram (EKG) – A trace of the electrical currents that initiated the heartbeat; used to diagnose possible heart disorders Epidemiology – The study of the health and diseases of populations Exercise EKG – An electrocardiogram performed when the patient was exercising, usually on a treadmill Holter Monitor – A diagnostic tool that utilized an extended wearing of an electrocardiogram mon- itor with which the patient transmitted events telephonically Intensive Care Unit (ICU) – A specialized patient care unit within a hospital utilized by patients who
  • 46. required constant, high level of care Invasive Cardiologist – A cardiologist who performed invasive procedures such as angioplasty Noninvasive Cardiologist – A cardiologist who specialized in medical treatment of heart disease rather than performing invasive procedures Nuclear Medicine – A field of diagnostic imaging that utilized nucleotide particles injected into the patient, then evaluated with a nuclear camera to produce an image Swan Ganz Catheter – A pressure catheter that was inserted into the right side of the heart to measure the performance of the heart Telemetry – The monitoring of the conduction patterns of the heart through radio wave transmission from a remote area to a central location Thrombolytic Therapy – The use of “clot dissolving” drugs to open blocked arteries T H E C A R D I A C P R O G R A M AT C M H both19.indd 807both19.indd 807 11/11/08 12:32:11 PM11/11/08 12:32:11 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 0 8 surgery program. Existing space would need to be renovated to accommodate
  • 47. the various service components. The additional cardiac service being considered would provide patients of CMH with a full-service cardiology program consistent with programs available at other community hospitals and with service areas comparable in size to the CMH service area. The programs and large expenditures would assure continuity of care for patients who received initial cardiac care at CMH. If the board decided not to commit to expanding the cardiac program, CMH patients needing open heart surgery or coronary angioplasty would continue to be transferred to another hospital in the region, such as Duke. Decision Factors A major part of the board of trustees’ consideration was whether or not there existed a large enough service area to sufficiently support open heart surgery and the expansion of the existing cardiac services. They wanted to know what population threshold would be required. Did they have enough population in the hospital’s existing service area? The trustees, in making their expansion decision, looked at a number of factors. They included: (1) the primary and secondary service areas based on historical data; (2) population growth; (3) population epidemiology; (4) availability of existing open heart surgery medical centers; (5) accessibility
  • 48. to cardiac surgery programs; (6) continuity of cardiology care; and (7) rate of demand for open heart surgery. The hospital’s planning staff, directed by vice president Glenn Reed, provided data on each of the areas. 1. Primary and Secondary Service Areas To determine the service area for the proposed heart program expansion, the existing service area for the hospital was identified by examining the hospital’s patient database and noting the patients’ residential addresses, particularly zip codes. Second, they mapped this service area and evaluated the road and trans- portation network, travel times, and other hospitals in the region. (See Exhibits 19/5 and 19/6.) In board discussions, president Wall advised the trustees that hospital plan- ners had looked at patient origins for an existing tertiary program – radiation oncology. This study showed that its major source of patients had been Concord and Kannapolis, with the remainder widely spread over 23 other communities. Mr. Wall asked, “Does this give us reason to believe we can expect referrals to CMH for open heart surgery to come from a wider service area than the hos- pital average?” (See Exhibits 19/7 and 19/8.) To further look at the question of patient origins, CMH studied zip code
  • 49. origins for its cardiac catheterization patients. Again, a large number of patients had Concord and Kannapolis zip codes and generally reflected patient origins both19.indd 808both19.indd 808 11/11/08 12:32:11 PM11/11/08 12:32:11 PM Exhibit 19/5 Cabarrus Memorial Hospital Patient Origin County % Patient Origin Cabarrus 80.1 Rowan 9.4 Stanly 7.2 Other 3.3 TOTAL 100.0 Note: “Other” includes Union, Mecklenburg, Davie, Davidson, Iredell, and Lincoln counties. Source: Hospital Patient Origin Report (North Carolina Medical Database Commission). R O W A N C A B A R R U S S T A N L Y M E C K L E N B U R G U N I O N
  • 51. *4 * 29 * 5 49 2 29 601 601 77 601 85 85 I R E D E L L Exhibit 19/6: Map of CMH Service Area Key: 1. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital 2. Rowan Memorial Hospital 3. Stanly Memorial Hospital 4. Union Memorial Hospital 5. University Memorial Hospital 6. Mercy Hospital 7. Presbyterian Hospital
  • 52. 8. Carolinas Medical Center 9. Lowrance Hospital both19.indd 809both19.indd 809 11/11/08 12:32:12 PM11/11/08 12:32:12 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 0 similar to those of the radiation oncology program. Again the board wondered if this indicated the open heart program would draw patients from a service area that would include parts or all of six counties: Cabarrus, Rowan, Stanly, Union, Iredell, and Mecklenburg. The outside boundaries of these counties are within 60 miles of Concord, the site of CMH. Mr. Wall questioned, “What would further analysis of the historical data lead planners to conclude about the program’s primary service area? Could it serve as much as 70 percent of Cabarrus and a third of Rowan County? Would the second- ary service area include parts of Stanly, Union, Mecklenburg, and Iredell Counties? What percentage of the population in those counties lived within 40 miles of CMH? Would this comprise a secondary service area large enough?” A major demographic factor driving the perceived demand for open heart surgery at CMH was population growth. According to the
  • 53. Government and Business Services Branch of the State Library of North Carolina, total population for these six counties was expected to increase 18.3 percent over the next ten years. Therefore, even if open heart surgery usage rates remained constant each year, counties in this service area could have expected at least 18 percent more open heart surgery cases over the ten year period. (See Exhibit 19/9.) 2. Growth of At-Risk Population A second major demographic factor driving the demand for open heart sur- gery was growth of the at-risk population. According to projections from the recent census, the number of people aged 45 to 64, the population most likely to Exhibit 19/8: Proposed CMH Open Heart Service Population County Population Market Cabarrus 69,255 70.0 Rowan 40,813 36.9 Stanly 7,661 14.8 Union 1,516 1.8 Mecklenburg 1,534 0.3 Iredell 651 0.7 Exhibit 19/7: CMH Patient Origin (%) Previous Year County Radiation Oncology Heart Catheterization
  • 54. Cabarrus 57.4 59.3 Rowan 16.0 30.4 Stanly 19.7 7.3 Other 6.9 3.0 TOTAL 100.0 100.0 both19.indd 810both19.indd 810 11/11/08 12:32:13 PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM 8 1 1 suffer occlusive coronary artery disease, was predicted to grow by 38.3 percent in the next ten years, a rate more than twice that of the general population. (See Exhibit 19/10.) 3. Population Epidemiology Based on the latest available data, all the proposed service area counties, with the exception of Union and Mecklenburg, had evidence of a heart disease mortality rate higher than that of the state as a whole (see Exhibit 19/11). According to the data that had been recently reported by the North Carolina Database Commission, open heart surgery usage rates in Cabarrus County were higher than that of the entire state. The previous year North Carolina had experienced a
  • 55. procedure rate of 1.39 per 1,000 population. 4. Availability of Existing Services for Patients in CMH Service Area North Carolina had 16 open heart surgery programs located in 11 counties. None of these programs was in the proposed CMH primary service area. Those closest to the CMH service area were located in Charlotte. They were Mercy Exhibit 19/9: Ten-Year Projection: Service Area Population Growth County Year 1 Year 2 Change (%) Cabarrus 98,935 112,802 14.0 Rowan 110,605 122,268 10.5 Stanly 51,765 55,185 6.6 Union 84,211 99,644 18.3 Mecklenburg 511,433 630,005 23.2 Iredell 92,931 103,820 11.7 TOTAL 949,880 1,123,724 18.3 Exhibit 19/10: Growth of At-Risk Population: Aged 45 to 64 Previous Year 10 years Change (%) Cabarrus 20,419 26,797 31.2 Rowan 22,729 28,348 24.7 Stanly 10,691 12,761 19.4 Union 16,458 23,290 41.5 Mecklenburg 91,747 135,154 47.3
  • 56. Iredell 19,950 25,504 27.8 TOTAL 181,994 251,854 38.4 D E C I S I O N F A C T O R S both19.indd 811both19.indd 811 11/11/08 12:32:13 PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 2 Hospital, Presbyterian Hospital, and Carolinas Medical Center, all located about 25 miles from CMH. Only one of the state’s 16 programs had claimed Cabarrus County in its primary service area. That claim had been made eight years earlier by Carolinas Medical Center when it opened its service. Since that time, Carolinas Medical Center had drawn only 5.6 percent of its patients from Cabarrus County, suggesting to the CMH board that Cabarrus patient volumes at Carolinas Medical Center did not warrant being included in Carolinas Medical Center’s primary service area. The three Charlotte programs had reported previous year operating room uti- lization for cardiac surgery as follows: Mercy Hospital, 36.3 percent; Presbyterian
  • 57. Hospital, 78.5 percent; and Carolinas Medical Center, 84.5 percent. Procedure volume had increased yearly at both Presbyterian and Carolinas Medical Center. Presbyterian, with its two open heart surgery suites operating at 78.5 percent of nominal capacity, apparently needed its operating rooms. Carolinas Medical Center, with its six rooms classified as combined “open heart surgery/thoracic suites,” had submitted a CON application for an additional open heart surgery room. However, earlier in the year, it had subsequently withdrawn its application for a CON. For the Department of Facilities Services to award a CON, the existing utilization rate for the cardiac surgery suite was required to be at 80 percent or higher. Procedure volume at Mercy Hospital had not followed a year-to- year growth pattern. Room utilization had been well under 50 percent each year for the pre- vious ten years. Moreover, Mercy did not appear to reach the proposed CMH open heart service area. In the previous year only 9 percent of the 174 people from Cabarrus County, and none from Rowan County, had received open heart surgery at Mercy. The pattern indicated a perceived or real barrier to access at Mercy by people in the CMH area counties. Generally, Mercy appeared to serve a population that was more south and east of Charlotte.
  • 58. 5. Accessibility to Cardiac Surgery Programs The existing open heart surgery programs in Charlotte, Winston-Salem, and Greensboro were 25 to 60 miles from the service population. Although this seemed Exhibit 19/11: Heart Disease Mortality Rates: Two Years Previous County Death Rate/1,000 Population Rowan 375.8 Cabarrus 320.7 Stanly 326.0 Union 246.5 Mecklenburg 225.0 Iredell 325.2 North Carolina 288.6 both19.indd 812both19.indd 812 11/11/08 12:32:13 PM11/11/08 12:32:13 PM 8 1 3 relatively close for a one-time procedure, it was inconvenient for persons traveling repeatedly for diagnosis, family support, and follow-up care. “Driving to Charlotte is becoming more and more of a problem,” commented a board member. “I am often asked why we can’t provide more
  • 59. care in Cabarrus County.” Heart patients from the CMH area had to travel to existing services along com- binations of country roads and heavily congested traffic arteries. Travel time was from one to two hours. Congestion and delay were expected to further increase the time as the Charlotte metropolitan area continued to grow 3 percent per year, a rate triple that of the state. Moreover, to many residents of the CMH service area, Charlotte was a big city and confusing for drivers from out of town. Its perceived distance was farther than its actual distance because of the delays in city travel. This had been noted with the opening of radiation oncology at CMH. Patient volumes were much higher than expected. Surveys of patients and families cited dis- tance, lack of transportation, and fear of the city as reasons for not having obtained radiation treatments at distant sites that had been recommended by their physicians. As part of the affiliation between Duke University Medical Center and Cabarrus Memorial hospital, two Duke open heart surgeons, Jim Lowe, MD, and Peter Smith, MD, participated in monthly conferences at CMH and con- sulted on patient candidates for open heart surgery. Those
  • 60. patient consulta- tions became referrals to Duke when surgery was indicated. The medical staff suggested that the patient trip of 120 miles to Duke would be eliminated if open heart surgery of equal quality could be performed at CMH, as was being proposed. However, it was expected that a few cases needing specialized care would still be referred to Duke (or other medical centers) after the CMH pro- gram was opened. Approximately 40 percent of CMH cardiac catheterization referrals were going to Duke. 6. Continuity of Cardiology Care Continuity of care for the cardiology patient was critical. Quality was enhanced when patient transfers were minimized, medical and nursing staff were con- stant, and staff and technology for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were maintained. To obtain the desired level of care, CMH patients were being trans- ferred to other facilities when cardiac surgery was indicated. This transfer dis- rupted continuity. According to the North Carolina Database Commission, for the previous year, 174 Cabarrus County and 118 Rowan County residents received open heart surgery in one of the following hospitals: Duke University Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, Carolinas Medical Center, NC Baptist
  • 61. Hospitals, and a few others. For many of those 292 patients, a CMH-based open heart surgery service would have avoided transfers and ensured continuity of cardiology care. (See Exhibit 19/12.) D E C I S I O N F A C T O R S both19.indd 813both19.indd 813 11/11/08 12:32:14 PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 4 The scope and comprehensiveness of cardiology services at CMH had expanded yearly. Two years previously, CMH had initiated its cardiac catheterization pro- gram. In the past year, the CMH program referred 117 patients to open heart surgery and 82 to angioplasty. In addition, Rowan Memorial Hospital, located in Salisbury (a half-hour’s drive to the north), had opened a cardiac catheterization service and could have been considered another referral source for the proposed CMH program. The next logical step in the continuity of cardiac care was argued to be the open heart surgery program. Availability of open heart surgery and angioplasty would have provided invasive options for treatment of coronary artery disease and reduced outside referrals to a small percentage of
  • 62. patients. A physi- cian board member commented, “It is time this becomes a full- service hospital. Cabarrus County deserves it and cardiac surgery will be just the beginning.” 7. Growth in Demand Over the previous ten years, North Carolina open heart surgery volume had increased an average of 26 percent a year. Moreover, statistical forecasts had predicted continued increases in use rate per 1,000 population for the next five years. The rate of 0.43 open heart surgeries per 1,000 population ten years ago had increased to 1.39 per 1,000. Cardiac catheterization was the major diagnostic procedure that resulted in a recommendation for open heart surgery. Changes in cardiac catheterization volumes were, therefore, important to predict open heart demand at a particular location. North Carolina cardiac catheterization volume had grown at an average annual rate of 16.2 percent over the prior nine years. Although the rate of growth was slowing, anecdotal projections and trended fore- casts predicted continued growth for the next five years. The state’s cardiac catheterization to open heart procedure ratio had also increased annually. Over the past year, the ratio had increased to 4.54 adult catheterizations for each open heart procedure. Similar to the annual growth rate
  • 63. for open heart surgery procedures, this ratio was also growing. Exhibit 19/12: Where Cabarrus-Rowan Residents Received Open Heart Surgery: Previous Year Destination Hospital Cabarrus Residents Rowan Residents Total Duke University Medical Center 28 16 44 Presbyterian Hospital 68 25 93 Mercy Hospital 9 0 9 Carolinas Medical Center 66 44 110 NC Baptist Hospitals 0 28 28 Unknown 3 5 8 TOTAL 174 118 292 both19.indd 814both19.indd 814 11/11/08 12:32:14 PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM 8 1 5 Financial Considerations In addition to market demand and trend analysis, the board was faced with the financial aspect of the decision. President Wall asked the CFO to present the financial data. An open heart surgery program would incur a number of expenses. In addi- tion to Dr. Christy and his surgical team, there would be a need for 23 additional employees in year 1, growing to 39 in year 3 (see Exhibit
  • 64. 19/13). It was projected there would be a need for ten beds licensed as acute care beds, not then being utilized, to become operational as coronary care beds. Addition- ally there would be a need for three intensive care unit (ICU) beds, and the one new open heart operating suite. A total of 5,811 sq. ft. of hospital space would require renovation. Projected capital costs, including construction and equipment, were $3,273,180. The hos- pital had sufficient reserve funds to underwrite the renovation project and the additional equipment without borrowing money. Exhibit 19/13: CMH Open Heart Staffing Plan Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 53 Procedures 106 Procedures 211 Procedures Operating Room Nurse Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 RN 2.50 3.50 6.00 OR Tech 2.00 2.00 3.00 OR Aide/Transport 0.50 0.50 1.00 CRNA 1.00 1.50 3.00 Anesthesia Tech 0.50 0.50 1.00 Respiratory Therapist 1.00 1.50 3.00 Subtotal 8.50 10.50 18.00 Surgery/Recovery
  • 65. Nurse Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50 RN 4.00 4.00 7.00 Ward Secretary 0.50 0.50 0.50 Subtotal 5.00 5.00 8.00 Telemetry Unit Nurse Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50 RN 3.00 4.00 7.00 Monitor Tech 3.00 3.00 3.00 Ward Secretary 0.50 0.50 0.50 Subtotal 7.00 8.00 11.00 Nurse Educator 0.50 0.50 0.50 Angioplasty RN 1.00 1.00 1.00 Angioplasty Tech 1.00 1.00 1.00 Subtotal 2.50 2.50 2.50 TOTAL 23.00 26.00 39.50 F I N A N C I A L C O N S I D E R AT I O N S both19.indd 815both19.indd 815 11/11/08 12:32:14 PM11/11/08 12:32:14 PM C A S E 1 9 : T H E C A S E F O R O P E N H E A R T S U R G E R Y AT C A B A R R U S8 1 6 Direct costs for the open heart program were projected to be $2,364,214 in year 1, $3,217,739 in year 2, and $5,438,392 in year 3 (see Exhibit 19/14). Average length
  • 66. of stay per open heart patient was projected to be nine days. Projected average open heart surgery fees per case were $13,000 without catheterization and $15,000 with catheterization. These estimates represented full, nonprofessional fees and the surgeon’s fee, as well as other professional components such as anesthesia, pathology, and radiology. Average room and board charges were estimated at $826 per day. All ancillaries were projected at $3,725 per day. Total average projected charge for each open heart surgery procedure was $40,957. The Meeting Draws to a Close President Wall and various members of the hospital staff had presented the findings to the trustees. The data and information had been collected, tabulated, and analyzed. It was time to make a decision. Should CMH go ahead with an application for a certificate of need for an open heart surgery program? As they sat there waiting for someone to speak, Mrs. West asked, “Mr. Batte, what do you think we should do? Do we go for the CON?” Exhibit 19/14: Open Heart Program Costs Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Direct Costs Clinical Personnel $711,793 $910,878 $1,695,457
  • 67. Administrative Personnel 136,565 147,490 159,289 Support Personnel 52,764 56,985 61,544 Personnel Taxes/Benefits 180,224 223,071 383,258 Medical Supplies 315,947 746,439 1,749,771 Other Supplies 15,950 68,980 75,445 Depreciation, Equipment 243,376 243,376 243,376 Plant Operations and Maintenance 48,087 52,415 57,132 Other Associated Expenses (Angioplasty) 449,965 534,033 615,723 Other Associated Expenses 99,543 99,212 99,212 Contracted Services 110,000 134,860 298,185 Total Direct Costs 2,364,214 3,217,739 5,438,392 Indirect Costs General and Administrative 255,966 302,376 416,862 Other Overhead 73,200 88,630 175,473 Depreciation, Building 43,525 43,525 43,525 Other Property, Ownership and Use Expense 2,036 2,402 2,835 Consultant Services 122,740 153,399 154,699 Rowan Community Outreach 6,183 6,739 7,346 Total Indirect Costs 503,650 597,071 800,740 Total Costs $2,867,864 $3,814,810 $6,239,132 both19.indd 816both19.indd 816 11/11/08 12:32:15 PM11/11/08 12:32:15 PM